Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
2007 (8) February (8) The Body , the Meat and the Spirit: Becoming Animal... Capitalism: A V ery Special Delirium Postscript on the Societies of Control Theory of Multiplicities in Bergson On Kant On Leibniz On Spinoza Capitalism, flows, the decoding of flows, capitali...
http://deleuzelectures.blogspot.com.au/2007/02/theory-of-multiplicities-in-bergson.html
1/3
3/5/2014
that grasps it, and on the contrary is multiple in itself by v irtue of its subdiv isions upon which the colligation bears. It's in this sense that ev ery number is a distinct multiplicity . And two essential consequences arise from this: at once that the one and the multiple belong to numerical multiplicities, and also the discontinuous and the continuous. The one or discontinuous qualifies the indiv isible act by which one conceiv es one number, then another, the multiple or continuous qualify ing on the contrary the (infinitely div isible) matter colligated by this act. There we are, how numerical multiplicities are defined, and in a certain way these are the ones that engender space: Time and Free Will, page 91 -92. But there is something quite odd. Time and Free Will appears in 1 889. In 1 891 Husserl's Philosophie der Arithmetik appears. There Husserl also proposes a theory of number: he there ex plicitly affirms the ex clusiv ely cardinal character of number, the colligation as sy nthesis of number and the div isible character of the unit. If he differs from Bergson, it's only on the relation of the colligation to space, Husserl thinking that the colligation is independent of spatial intuition; but ev en this difference is seriously mitigated if one considers the notion of ideal space in Bergson, space being in no way a property of things but a scheme of action, that is to say an original and irreducible intellectual sy nthesis (cf. Matter & Memory 21 0-1 1 ). So there is an astonishing parallelism. Furthermore, Husserl in turn considers number as a ty pe of multiplicity . Furthermore, Husserl opposes this ty pe of multiplicity that is number to another ty pe: when I enter a room and see that there are lots of people, when I look at the sky and see lots of stars, or lots of trees in the forest, or a line of columns in a temple. There, actually , there is no numerical multiplicity : it's in its v ery looming up [surgissement] that a sensorial aggregate presents a mark that makes it recognizable as a multiplicity , and as a multiplicity of a totally different ty pe than the numerical multiplicity , without any ex plicit colligation: this is an implied multiplicity , a qualitativ e multiplicity . Husserl speaks of quasi-qualitativ e characteristics, or of an organized multiplicity , or of figural factors. It's a property of the Whole, which, as it's too easy to say , is in no way independent of its elements, but which has complex relations with its elements that are completely different than those a numerical collection has with its elements. And Husserl doesn't fail to cite the ex ample of melody . It's quite ev ident that Husserl here agrees with the work of his contemporary Ehrenfels who, in 1 890, spoke of Gestalt qualities, distinct from the qualities proper to the elements, of another order than those qualities, and abov e all and ex plicitly the work of Stumpf who, in 1 885, inv oked the notion of V erschmelzung to designate a sort of passiv e (non-intellectual) sy nthesis, the apprehension of qualities of an order superior to that of the elements. Thus there we hav e what the non-numerical multiplicity is. Now this seems quite far from Bergson. And y et it's not so: the strokes of the clock, in chapter two of Time and Free Will, can enter into a numerical multiplicity , but when I am distracted, what happens? They are based in a non-numerical qualitativ e multiplicity . Multiplicity of fusion, of interpenetration. It's true that in Bergson it inv olv es a fusion, but there's nothing of the kind in Husserl or Stumpf, who observ e that the more clearly the elements, the notes of a melody are perceiv ed, the more forcefully the quality of the set [ensemble] affirms itself.
2 C OM M EN T S: Prof. Ing. Ramon Oscar fernandez said... UN EJEMPLO DE MULTIPLICIDAD CON SIGNIFICADO ES EL CASO DEL COLOR.. ACASO ES POSIBLE SIGNIFICAR EL COLOR SIN LA PRESENCIA DE LAS FORMAS QUE ELLAS SIGNIFICAN.. EL "ROJO" ES UNA MULTIPLICIDAD EN SI MISMO.. CON PRESENCIAS DE LOCALIZACION MULTIPLES.. Y A QUE EL COLOR NO ESTA SITUADO EN UN LUGAR EN PARTICULAR Y NO ES POSIBLE REDUCIR AL "ROJO" A UNAEXPERIENCIA NICA... SOLO AS UNA PINTURA TIENE EL MISMO SIGNIFICADO QUE UNA MELODIA A P RI L 2 2 , 2 0 1 2 A T 9 :3 9 A M Joe Daniels said... Good to see relational opposites - in this case qualitativ e and quantitativ e multiplicities, if I read y ou right - that are posited without recourse to the dialecticism that was infesting philosophy at the time. NO V EM BER 1 3 , 2 0 1 3 A T 5 :3 5 PM
http://deleuzelectures.blogspot.com.au/2007/02/theory-of-multiplicities-in-bergson.html
2/3
3/5/2014
Post a Comment
http://deleuzelectures.blogspot.com.au/2007/02/theory-of-multiplicities-in-bergson.html
3/3