CHAPTER IV RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

This chapter presents the research findings and the analysis of the data gathered.

A. Data and Findings Table 1.1 IV-Falcon Pre-test Results on Electrical Circuit before Peer Teaching Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Score 13 13 13 13 12 11 11 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 4 246/1,200

Table 1.1 shows the pre-test results of the students of IV-Falcon before peer teaching on the topic Electric Circuit. The over-all result of the students pre-test gathered was 246 out of 1,200, since the researchers have 30 respondents and a forty-item test was given to them. So 1,200 is the result.

Table 1.2 IV-Falcon Post-test Results on Electrical Circuit after Peer Teaching Student 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 Total Score 15 16 15 15 16 14 15 14 15 21 15 15 20 12 14 14 15 13 17 19 14 15 15 12 21 16 15 13 12 14 457/1,200

Table 1.2 shows the post-test results of the students of IV-Falcon after they underwent peer teaching. Results show that the scores of the students increased two times compared to the scores during the pre-test. The over-all data gathered on the results of the students scores on the post-test was 457 out of 1,200. Table 2 Test results of the IV-Falcon students in Electric circuit before peer teaching. MEAN STUDENT 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 GRAND MEAN Pre-test Score 13 13 13 13 12 11 11 10 10 10 9 9 9 8 8 8 8 7 7 7 6 6 6 6 5 5 4 4 4 4 8.2 Post-test Score 15 16 15 15 16 14 15 14 15 21 15 15 20 12 14 14 15 13 17 19 14 15 15 12 21 16 15 13 12 14 15.23

Table 2 shows the difference between the test results of the IV-Falcon students in electric circuit before and after peer teaching. The researchers have given the pre-test to the thirty students of IV-Falcon before peer teaching and the post test was given after peer teaching. The gathered mean for the pre-test results is 8.2 while the gathered mean for the post-test results is 15.23. B. Analysis of Data Table 3 T-test analysis of the result on the difference between the test results of the IVFalcon students in Electric circuit before and after peer teaching.
Variable No. of Treatment Mean Value Standard Deviation Degree of Freedom Critical Value Computed T-Value Statistical Decision

Pre-test

8.2

2.93 58 10.27 Reject Ho

Post-test

15.23

2.34

Table 3 shows the T-Test results of the difference between the test results of the IV-Falcon students in Electric circuit before and after peer teaching. The variable, pre-test has 1 treatment, a mean value of 8.2 and a standard deviation of 2.93. The other variable, post-test, has 1 treatment, a mean value of 15.23 and a standard deviation of 2.34 with both variables having a degree of freedom of 58. As shown in the table, the critical value of 1.6715 is less than the computed value of 10.27, so the decision is to reject Ho. The decision implies that there is a significant difference between the test results of the IV-Falcon students in Electric circuit before and after peer teaching on a 0.05 level of significance.

CHAPTER V SUMMARY, CONCLUTION AND RECOMMENDATION

A. Summary and Conclusion B. Recommendation

ACKNOWLEDGEMENT
The researchers would like to extend their heartfelt gratitude to the people who had collaborated with this study and that in one way around helped them go through from those unyielding times spent. To our school principal, Mr. Roberto D. Bibanco who never stop in supporting the researchers to pursue in doing the study. Thanks for your support, the researchers have realize that no matter what happens, continue to do the things even if it takes time. To the adviser, Mr. Lourman C. Galiza and who equipped them with knowledge, guidance and courage to make a plan. Through their constructive criticisms, the researchers built up their confidence and came up with a great study. To the researchers parents for their financial support, understanding and love for every endeavor the researchers went through. Above all things to the Almighty Father, for the skills and wisdom and for letting the researchers feel that they are completely nothing without Him. For whatever the researchers have done, they owe it all to Him. Thank You and God Bless!