Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Replace faulty packaging supplies Add human interface technology Real time equipment monitoring 16-Mar-14 Use TQM packaging methods Improving operator training Utilize collabrative company resources BY JONEY KARAWA Add new monitoring equipment Follow Gov. Safety Regulations
Increase automation
Our product
0 0
Customer Requirements S.No. Describe the Requirement Develop packaging processes that 1 are safe 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Ability to improve process reliability Ability to improve process effiency Ease of use for new equipment Ability to record process data Meet or exceed current packaging demands Improve current safety ratings Improve serviceability of the system Perform within strict deadlines
1 5 4 4 3 5 3 4 4 3 3 5 5 4 3 5 4 5 3 1 9 9 3 3 3
2 9
3 3 1 9
7 3
8 3 9
10 9
11 3 9
12
13
14 3
15
16
17
18
19
20 5 5 5 3 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 4 5 5 4 5 5 4 4 4 3 4 5 3 4 4 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 3 5 3 4 5 3 3 2 5 4 4 4 3 2 4 4 5 3 5 2 3 4 4 4 3 5 5 2 4 3 5
3 9 1
1 9 1
3 3 3
3 9
9 9
3 9
5 5 4
9 3 9 3 3 3 3 9 9 1 3 1
9 9
9 9 9 3 9 1
9 9 9 1 1 3 3 9 1 3
9 3
3 3 1
5 4 4 5 1 4 4
1 1 1
1 3
3 3 3 9
Lowest possible maintaince costs 10 and complexity 11 Use reliable packaging supplies 12 Data backup and storage 13 Use of automated feedback 14 Process simplicity 15 Efficent packaging factory layouts 16 Use of proven methods 17 Continuing process improvement 18 19 20 Target Values (List here the parameters that specify engineering solutions accurately. If you don't know the range of the acceptable values, use our Taguchi Calculator Program for Designing an Experiment)
6
1 3 1 1 1 1 1 3 3 3 9 3
9 3 1 9 1 3 1 3 3 1 3 1 3 3 9 1 9 3 9 9
5 5 5 4 5 4 5
21
Within 5 minutes
Within 3 weeks
Data refreshed every 24msec Within system upgrade Within system upgrade Within hour of problem
Every process
Every process
Every Month
Our product
4
3 2
1
0
Absolute Importance Rating Relative Importance Rating Enter Our Product ratings (1=Low, 5=High) Enter Competitor A's ratings (1-5); Graph Enter Competitor B's ratings (1-5); Graph Enter Competitor C's ratings (1-5); Graph
118 5.5 4 3 4 3
96 4.5 4 4 3 2
67 3.1 5 4 4 3
0 0
0 0
0 0
0 0