CCNA2 Chapter 7 Practice Test Answers

Which is a difference between RIP version 1 and RIP version 2? The routing metric The routing algorithm Support for authentication Support for hierarchical networks

Which of these is a characteristic of RIP v2 that makes it more suitable for modern networks than RIP v1? It is a classless routing protocol. It is a classful routing protocol Its metric can accommodate a larger network It has a lower administrative distance

Wh! is the use of a multicast address for RIP v2 routing updates an improvement over the use of a broadcast address? Routers give priorit! to multicast addressed packets when the! are received whereas broadcast receives low priorit! It eases the pressure on the limited number of usable IP addresses Hosts that are not running RIP will discard the packets at layer 2 instead of processing them as far as layer 4. It enables the routers to learn about all other routers in the s!stem that are running RIP v2

What information is found in a RIP v2 update but not in a RIP v1 update? "#hoose 2$ %etwork address Subnet mask %umber of hops Ne t hop address &efault route

'ow do RIP v1 and RIP v2 compare in their features to avoid routing loops? RIP v1 uses the split hori(on rule but RIP v2 does not need to use it RIP v1 takes longer to count to infinit! than RIP v2 RIP v2 has a higher default value for its holddown counter RIP v2) being classless) is less prone to develop routing loops !oth "ersions use the same methods of a"oiding routing loops.

SW

2*+1,+2,,-

+var+www+apps+conversion+tmp+scratch.2+21-*,,-*/ doc

192 18: 1 *2+2-

192 18: 1 222+*, 192 18: 1 8/+2192 18: 1 ,+2Wh! should RIP v2 be run on this network rather than RIP v1? The ma0or network address has been subnetted The subnets are discontiguous #$S% has been used. #I&R has been used

192 18: 1 98+2-

Wh! should RIP v2 not be run with default settings on a network with discontiguous subnets? It summarises to class boundaries so that remote discontiguous networks are not recognised. It does not send subnet mask information in its routing updates) so it cannot recognise subnets unless the! are directl! connected It has a ma1imum hop count of 12 and this is not enough to reach discontiguous subnets It does not support 34S5 or #I&R so that it cannot carr! out the summarising needed for discontiguous networks 1-2 18 * ,+2/ 6 1-2 18 2 ,+2/ 1-2 18 1 ,+2/ Routers 6 and 7 are running RIP v2 with default settings What networks should 6 advertise to 7? 1-2 18 1 ,+2/) 1-2 18 2 ,+2/ and 1-2 18 * ,+2/ 1-2 18 1 ,+22 &'2.&(.).)*&( 1-2 18 , ,+2* and 1-2 18 2 ,+2* 7

SW

2*+1,+2,,-

+var+www+apps+conversion+tmp+scratch.2+21-*,,-*/ doc

The 192 18: 1 , network has been subnetted using 34S5 and all the subnets are contiguous Router & is the border router leading to another group of networks) and it advertises 192 18: 1 ,+2/ to Router ; 6ll routers in the s!stem are running RIP v2 6 packet addressed to 192 18: 1 2 arrives at Router ; What will happen? Router ; will drop the packet because it does not have a route to the re<uired subnet Router + will send the packet on the summary route to Router , and Router , will then forward the packet on to the right subnet. Router ; will send the packet on its default route to Router & and Router & will then forward the packet on to the right subnet Router ; will send the packet to Router & but router & will drop the packet

Router 6 has been configured to run RIP with default settings It=s immediate neighbour) Router 7) has been configured to run RIP v2 What is true of the updates? The routers are running different versions of RIP and so neither router can read routing updates from the other router Router 6 will send version 1 updates which can be read b! Router 7) but Router 7 will send version 2 updates which cannot be read b! Router 6 Router 7 will autodetect that Router 6 is running RIP v1 and will therefore send v1 updates to Router 6 Router ! will send "2 updates to Router - and Router - will read the updates. but ignore information that is specific to "2.

Which are e1amples of supernetting? "#hoose 2$ 1, 1, , ,+12 1, 1, , ,+18 1, 1, , ,+21 &'2.&/.).)*&2 1-2 19 , ,+18 1-2 19 , ,+21 1-2 19 , ,+2/ &/2.&(0.).)*2& 192 18: , ,+2/

Which command would propagate a default route across a network where routers are running RIP v2? &efault>route propagate ,efault1information originate Redistribute rip

SW

2*+1,+2,,-

+var+www+apps+conversion+tmp+scratch.2+21-*,,-*/ doc

 Redistribute default>information 6 router configuration includes the following? Router"config$@int fa,+, Router"config>if$@ip address 1-2 18 1 , 222 222 222 , Router"config$@int fa,+1 Router"config>if$@ip address 1-2 18 2 , 222 222 222 , Router"config$@int s,+, Router"config>if$@ip address 1-2 18 * , 222 222 222 , The router is running RIP v1 Would it be sensible to configure serial ,+1 with the IP address 1-2 18 2, , 222 222 222 222? %o) because this is not a valid subnet mask for a serial interface %o) because this would create an overlap of IP addresses %o) because the 1-2 18 / , address should be used ne1t for consistenc! No. because this would in"ol"e #$S% which is not supported by RIP "&. Aes) this would be acceptable because it is on a different classful network

Router 6 has a summarised route to 1-2 18 , ,+1/ It sends a RIP v2 update including this route to Router 7) which is also running RIP v2 What happens? Router ! installs the summarised route to &'2.&(.).)*&4 in its routing table 2assuming that it has no better route.3 Router 7 performs automatic summarisation to the class boundar! and installs a route to 1-2 18 , ,+18 Router 7 performs automatic summarisation to the class boundar! and installs routes to 1-2 18 , ,+18) 1-2 18 1 ,+18) 1-2 18 2 ,+18 and 1-2 18 * ,+18 Router 7 does not install an! route to 1-2 18 , , in its routing table

Router 6 has a summarised route to 1-2 18 , ,+1/ It sends a RIP v2 update including this route to Router 7) which is running RIP v1 What happens? Router 7 installs the summarised route to 1-2 18 , ,+1/ in its routing table "assuming that it has no better route $ Router 7 performs automatic summarisation to the class boundar! and installs a route to 1-2 18 , ,+18 Router 7 performs automatic summarisation to the class boundar! and installs routes to 1-2 18 , ,+18) 1-2 18 1 ,+18) 1-2 18 2 ,+18 and 1-2 18 * ,+18 Router ! does not install any route to &'2.&(.).) in its routing table.

SW

2*+1,+2,,-

+var+www+apps+conversion+tmp+scratch.2+21-*,,-*/ doc

192 18: 1 1::+*, 192 18: 1 ,+22

192 18: 1 12:+2-

192 18: 1 22,+*,

192 18: 1 192+2-

Wh! is there a problem with the addressing scheme above? 4here is an o"erlap between &/2.&(0.&.22)*5) and &/2.&(0.&.&/2*2' There is an overlap between 192 18: 1 1::+*, and 192 18: 1 192+2There is an overlap between 192 18: 1 12:+2- and 192 18: 1 1::+*, 192 18: 1 1:: is not a valid network address 192 18: 1 22, is not a valid network address

Ba,+, 192 18: - 1 Aou want the 192 18: - , network to be advertised in routing updates) but !ou do not want routing updates to be sent out of interface 192 18: - 1 Which commands should !ou give? "#hoose 2$ Router2config36router rip Router2config1router36network &/2.&(0.'.) Router"config$@router rip Router"config>router$@no network 192 18: - , Router"config$@router rip Router"config>router$@192 18: - 1 inactive Router"config$@int fa,+, Router"config>router$@shutdown Router2config36router rip Router2config1router36passi"e1interface &/2.&(0.'.&

SW

2*+1,+2,,-

+var+www+apps+conversion+tmp+scratch.2+21-*,,-*/ doc