Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 26

Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Modelling of geothermal reservoirs


Alessandro Speranza1 Iacopo Borsi2 Maurizio Ceseri2 Angiolo Farina2 Antonio Fasano2 Luca Meacci2 Mario Primicerio2 Fabio Rosso2
1 Industrial 2 Dept.

Innovation Throught Technological Trasnfer, I2T3 of Mathematics, University of Florence

Modelling week 2009, Madrid

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Dip. Di Matematica U. Dini

MAC-GEO Project

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal systems

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal systems The physical problem

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Geothermal energy
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

The geothermal energy is due to the heat deep under the ground Need contemporary presence of water and a heat source. Only a fractured soil can make productive the reservoir

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

The geothermal system


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal reservoirs consist of A deep heat source (magma intrusion) A fractured rock layer A water reservoir

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Geothermal areas in Europe


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermic potential is widely spread However, not all can be exploited High geothermal gradient in Toscany

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

High geothermal potential in Toscany


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

High geothermal gradient (> 10 C) in Toscany Larderello is the oldest exploited reservoir (1905)

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Main types of geothermal reservoirs


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Geothermal reservoirs are typically Water dominated: water is mostlty found in liquid phase, e.g., Amiata. Characterized by very high pressure (> 100 bar) and temperature (> 300 C). Vapour dominated: water is mostly found in gas phase, e.g., Larderello. Characterized by fairly low pressure ( 70 bar) and high temperature (> 300 C). In some vapour dominated reservoirs, the uid could be found in a mixture of liquid and gas phases (e.g., Monteverdi Marittima).

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

The physical model


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Need to express in mathematical terms, the complex physics of a geothermal reservoir. The aspects to consider involve
Thermodynamics of mixtures of water, gases (NCGs) and salts Fluid motion in porous (fractured) medium Heat conduction/convection

Numerical data, such as, petrophysical properties, uid properties, pressure, temperature, boundaries etc., on the reservoir are often unknown or very uncertain. ENEL provided the most of the data we will use.

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Thermodynamics of the reservoir, water only


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Water vapour pressure P (T ) 961 exp 17.27 (T 273) T

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Mixture, in the real world


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Polydispersity Phase envelope changes with concentrations Gas-liquid equilibrium, within a region of phase diagram
A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling

The physical model


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Assume general 3D geometry Assume Darcys law is valid in fractured medium (equivalent porosity/permeability) General mixture of n components Assume gas-liquid phase coexistence; phase equlibrium (!) Conservation laws (mass and energy) Set suitable boundary conditions

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Mass/energy conservation law


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Mass conservation ( xi S ) + ( xi S vi ) = t Mi 1 ext + ( xi S ) Mtot Vext

= where

xi is mass fraction of i -th component in phase S is saturation of phase is porosity vi velocity of the i -th component in phase ext is total mass of extracted/injected uid per time unit Vext is total volume of the extraction/injection well mass exchanged per unit time, due to phase change
A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling

Momentum conservation
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Assume Darcys law for uid velocity q = S v = K kr (P + g) ,

Where kr is relative permeability and is dynamic viscosity of phase Assume, e.g., isotropic absolute permeability K = K Id,

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Energy conservation
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Total energy conservation (1 )r cr T + t S u

(h q ) =

+ [mix T ] , where
u is the internal energy density (per mass unit) of phase h is the henthalpy density of phase and mix = (1 )r + S

/r is the heat conductivity of phase /rock

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Coupling with thermodynamics


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Phase equilibrium conditions couple with the set of PDEs At a given T , given a set of parent densities, i
(0)

=
=l ,g

xi S ,

Two phases are in equilibrium when


G L i = i ,

where

F (i , T ), i are the chemical potentials Also impose lever rule and volume conservation i =
L L S G G i + S i = i
A. Speranza et al.

(0)

SG +SL = 1

Geothermal modelling

Final considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Sum mass conservation equations over phases, to get rid of mass transfer due to phase change Get a set of n (mass equations) + 1 (energy equation) + n (chemical potentials equality) + n (lever rule) + 1 (volume conservation) = 3n + 2 Equations.
G L In i , i = xi , S , S , T , i.e., 3n + 3 unknowns. Pressures are given by EOS, P = P ( i ,T) Add extra constitutive equation over P (0)

PG = PL in equilibrium P G = P L + Pc in case of capillary pressure


A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling

Other considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Need to impose boundary conditions for i (0) and xi ) Need to set appropriate initial values All the data above are usually unknown

(0)

and T (or P

Petrophysical properties can be only guessed Coupling of PDEs and thermodynamics is not an easy task

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Possible simplifying assumptions


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Model only well region Cylindrical symmetry could be reduced to 1D Assume water only, thus
Liquid density is constant Gas density is given by Ideal Gas EOS Phase coexistence only on vapour pressure curve

Assume temperature, varying linearly with depth and constant in t (no energy conservation) Assume no extraction/injection; just set a lower value of P at the top boundary Can assume (we will) natural recharge

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Free boundary problem


Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

In case of gas/liquid phase separation Becomes a 1D free boundary problem


Impermeable rocks at the top (x=0) Assume constant (in time) temperature T = T (x ), linear in x Gas reservoir starting at x = Ls = 1300 Impose xed pressure value P = Ps at x = Ls to simulate extraction well. Sharp (moving) interface s (t ) between gas and liqud. Assume saturated vapour pressure on s Liquid between x = s (t ) and x = Li = 3000 Assume xed pressure value at bottom P (x = Li ) = Pi Assume no bottom ux (isolated reservoir)
A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling

Final considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Full model is very complex No analysis can be made, only full 3D simulations. Several commercial codes simulate such systems of equations, with some simplications on thermodynamics (e.g., TOUGH2) However, simple 1D can help to understand how things go, e.g., how a vapor/liquid reservoir could evolve into a vapor dominated one, such as in the case of Monteverdi Marittima Possible further step, go cylindrical symmetry and add a vaporization front.

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations

Good work

A. Speranza et al.

Geothermal modelling

Вам также может понравиться