Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
MAC-GEO Project
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Geothermal systems
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Outline
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermal energy
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
The geothermal energy is due to the heat deep under the ground Need contemporary presence of water and a heat source. Only a fractured soil can make productive the reservoir
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermal reservoirs consist of A deep heat source (magma intrusion) A fractured rock layer A water reservoir
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermic potential is widely spread However, not all can be exploited High geothermal gradient in Toscany
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
High geothermal gradient (> 10 C) in Toscany Larderello is the oldest exploited reservoir (1905)
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermal reservoirs are typically Water dominated: water is mostlty found in liquid phase, e.g., Amiata. Characterized by very high pressure (> 100 bar) and temperature (> 300 C). Vapour dominated: water is mostly found in gas phase, e.g., Larderello. Characterized by fairly low pressure ( 70 bar) and high temperature (> 300 C). In some vapour dominated reservoirs, the uid could be found in a mixture of liquid and gas phases (e.g., Monteverdi Marittima).
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Need to express in mathematical terms, the complex physics of a geothermal reservoir. The aspects to consider involve
Thermodynamics of mixtures of water, gases (NCGs) and salts Fluid motion in porous (fractured) medium Heat conduction/convection
Numerical data, such as, petrophysical properties, uid properties, pressure, temperature, boundaries etc., on the reservoir are often unknown or very uncertain. ENEL provided the most of the data we will use.
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Polydispersity Phase envelope changes with concentrations Gas-liquid equilibrium, within a region of phase diagram
A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling
Assume general 3D geometry Assume Darcys law is valid in fractured medium (equivalent porosity/permeability) General mixture of n components Assume gas-liquid phase coexistence; phase equlibrium (!) Conservation laws (mass and energy) Set suitable boundary conditions
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
= where
xi is mass fraction of i -th component in phase S is saturation of phase is porosity vi velocity of the i -th component in phase ext is total mass of extracted/injected uid per time unit Vext is total volume of the extraction/injection well mass exchanged per unit time, due to phase change
A. Speranza et al. Geothermal modelling
Momentum conservation
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Where kr is relative permeability and is dynamic viscosity of phase Assume, e.g., isotropic absolute permeability K = K Id,
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Energy conservation
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
(h q ) =
+ [mix T ] , where
u is the internal energy density (per mass unit) of phase h is the henthalpy density of phase and mix = (1 )r + S
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Phase equilibrium conditions couple with the set of PDEs At a given T , given a set of parent densities, i
(0)
=
=l ,g
xi S ,
where
F (i , T ), i are the chemical potentials Also impose lever rule and volume conservation i =
L L S G G i + S i = i
A. Speranza et al.
(0)
SG +SL = 1
Geothermal modelling
Final considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Sum mass conservation equations over phases, to get rid of mass transfer due to phase change Get a set of n (mass equations) + 1 (energy equation) + n (chemical potentials equality) + n (lever rule) + 1 (volume conservation) = 3n + 2 Equations.
G L In i , i = xi , S , S , T , i.e., 3n + 3 unknowns. Pressures are given by EOS, P = P ( i ,T) Add extra constitutive equation over P (0)
Other considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Need to impose boundary conditions for i (0) and xi ) Need to set appropriate initial values All the data above are usually unknown
(0)
and T (or P
Petrophysical properties can be only guessed Coupling of PDEs and thermodynamics is not an easy task
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Model only well region Cylindrical symmetry could be reduced to 1D Assume water only, thus
Liquid density is constant Gas density is given by Ideal Gas EOS Phase coexistence only on vapour pressure curve
Assume temperature, varying linearly with depth and constant in t (no energy conservation) Assume no extraction/injection; just set a lower value of P at the top boundary Can assume (we will) natural recharge
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Final considerations
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Full model is very complex No analysis can be made, only full 3D simulations. Several commercial codes simulate such systems of equations, with some simplications on thermodynamics (e.g., TOUGH2) However, simple 1D can help to understand how things go, e.g., how a vapor/liquid reservoir could evolve into a vapor dominated one, such as in the case of Monteverdi Marittima Possible further step, go cylindrical symmetry and add a vaporization front.
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling
Geothermal modelling A. Speranza et al. Geothermal systems The physical problem Mathematical model The modelling week problem Final considerations
Good work
A. Speranza et al.
Geothermal modelling