Genesis of Cosmic Equation

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION
Part 1
GENESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION
E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C
Autor of the book : Goran enanovi Rocky 328mic001@gmail.com +38598803843 tel Viber WhatsApp Rocky_Rokel skype
Page 1
Part 1
CONTENT
About the author _____________________________________________________________________ 3
Introduction ___________________________________________________________________ 4 The sensational discovery : Cosmic formula___________________________________________ 6 Explanation and origin of cosmic formula ___________________________________________ 7 Pythagorean theorem - the way to a solution _________________________________________ 9 The definition of the EM wave _____________________________________________________ 10 Reverse engineering space/time without mass _______________________________________ 11 Photoelectric effect and the photoelectric results ______________________________________ 11 Electron elementary charge and locating faults ________________________________________ 15 Definition of photons in the formula wave ___________________________________________ 16 The modified constants ___________________________________________________________ 19 The mass of the electron __________________________________________________________ 21 The sensational discovery : the Planck formula that lacks ________________________________ 23 The fine structure constant _______________________________________________________ 24 The sensational discovery : New formula and the amount of unified mass of atoms ___________ 26 Check of the formula ____________________________________________________________ 28 Calling the documentation ________________________________________________________ 31 All copyrights reserved ____________________________________________________________ 33
Page 2

About the author
Part 1
Goran enanovi born 28.04.1972 . in Zagreb , Republic of Croatia is a self-taught scientist and researcher .Their preferences and interests toward science shows still in its infancy when it is starting to preoccupy questions about the evolution of the World and the size of the Universe . Also trying to find answers to the question of who were the ancient civilizations on Earth , why they disappeared , what was the purpose and the need to build the great pyramids , and whether there are alien worlds ... ? Maturation begins to look for answers in the literature and television shows that have been available to him . That was the first time that they had with Nikola Tesla and his majestic appearance and work, he becomes an idol and inspiration for his further progress in school and in life today. After completing primary school has enrolled in secondary vocational school in Zagreb and completed his schooling as a professional Electro for household appliances . In this period of schooling Goran started to engage in electronics as a hobby and concluded its first radio transmitters , radio receivers and various electronic circuits and became a radio amateur . Inspired by the work and progressive ideas of Nikola Tesla , Goran depth study the nature of the EM radio waves in all frequency bands . Timeline: Nineties: Deals with the installation and servicing of satellite antenna and gained vast experience and achieved excellent results in the business. At the beginning of this century and deals with GSM communication devices that have just started to emerge in Croatia since. Employed as the main service in a private company and that achieved huge successes ( without previous professional seminars and training ) in the third and fourth degree servicing of mobile phones . Late 2005. year until today Goran intensely devoted to scientific re - proving the wireless transmission of energy through the natural media . 2013th Goran calculated and constructed devices for the wireless transfer of energy by Tesla principle and successfully carried out the experiment with the actual goal- wireless transfer of energy through the Earth . 04/29/2013 comes to sensational discovery of cosmic formula .
Page 3

INTRODUCTION
Part 1
E= m*c
c=299792458m/s Joule unit of energy J Where kg is the kilogram , m is the meter , s is the second , N Newton , Pa Pascal , W is watts , C is the coulomb , and V is the volt . In A.Einstein formula E is energy , m is mass , c is the speed of light . This has so far set up a paradigm based on the speed of light as a fixed constant in the universe , and it seems that everything is as it should be, but still something wrong. When the 1905th The A. Einstein introduced the world his formula end expounded the theory , science is headed in the right study of atoms and atomic energy and followed and many great discoveries . Yet we just keep this on the theory and formula and find key answer to the question of what results she disagrees and theoretically should be stacked in the above equations . Let's start from the beginning and let's look at two basic principles of relativity : 1.postulate relativity The laws of physics are the same in all inertial reference systems . 2. Constancy speed of light in vacuum The speed of light in vacuum has the same value 'll all inertial reference systems . The speed of light in vacuum c (299792458 m / s ) is so huge that we would not notice a delay between transmission and reception of electromagnetic waves under normal circumstances . Speed of light in vacuum is actually only the absolute velocity and the same for all observers as specified in the second postulate . I studied these postulates and came to the conclusion that they did not really have a problem as they strive so hard to find and do .This will complete the definition of photons : A photon is an elementary particle , the quantum of electromagnetic radiation , which moves in the vacuum speed of light c . There is no rest mass , and contains energy and information . According to the first and second postulate STR - and here we come to the first problem : Photon not ( classically beyond comprehension ) particles and only has wave properties . If we understand it as can be seen that the photons travel constantly vacuum and says no definition of rest mass . Which is understandable and supports both postulates . From another point of view let's look Einstein's formula, and we can conclude
Page 4
Part 1
that the product of the masses can not be the product of two masses that would result in energy . What exactly is c squared in the formula ? We define the mass in kilograms , c is defined as the movement of m / s . From this we can conclude that the mass in the formula E = m * c has the energy and have the energy of movement , rest mass energy arises then multiplying the mass of electrons and photons have no mass and also idle . When we say energy mass movement that we mean another vector external or internal force acting on the mass. This begs the question of how to actually move these photons to the second postulate of STR 's? For decades , the question arises whether a photon is a particle or a wave and finally we solve this dilemma as it should . The particles have a dual nature as , for example, an electron which is proven 1929 years of Louis de Broglie French physicist for which he received the Nobel Prize . Modern research at CERN have shown that dual nature have all bosons to the latest discovered Higgs boson that decays into two photons for which Peter Higgs and Francois Englert 2013 years also received the Nobel Prize for the discovery and of course the boson . At the end, the photon does not behave like particles - no dual nature . Let us continue with this assumption and get back to the question what is it c squared in Einstein's formula. Since there is no particle properties is understandable that the answer was in the domain of electromagnetic . But before I full explain EM characteristic of light c , be noted that it is necessary I will c squared considered as a space / time ( m / s ) where there is a particle of mass m . According to the theorem of Pythagoras square of the length expressed in meters is equal to c m , also the square of the time is equal to c . From this I conclude that the time is perpendicular to the space that it is inseparable from one another and that it is in fact on the photon field that is always in motion . Albert Einstein used this logic in its formula and thus practically defined by any particle three-dimensional ( mass ) relative to the photon and threedimensional the photons in the coordinate system c ( 2D ) and predicted to be a particle of mass m can range from standstill to any speed less than that it 'll all inertial systems . James Clerk Maxwell 1864. The developed theory of electromagnetism which connected the electrical and magnetic phenomena , and predicted the existence of electromagnetic waves that move at light speed . Maxwell's equations are fundamental laws which are subjected to all electric and magnetic phenomena . Year , 1888. R. Heinrich Hertz experimentally proved the correctness of his theory of electromagnetic waves. All formulas are proven , and therefore valid today but EM waves theoretically and mathematically not described until the end , and I see why, in either of these formulas do not exist pi = 3.14159 to describe spherical wave propagation from the source of radiation . The vacuum is filled with photons that are constantly moving or vacuum is filled with EM wave / field . The energy of mass m that is not moving in a vacuum results in its internal energy of the motion of electrons , without external influence on the mass m performs the EM field ethereal / wave photons . It also applies when the mass of his movement through the vacuum . Photons are the constituent factors of vacuum . According to Gauss's law : The source of the electric field has an electrical charge . All this is so conclusively proven facts and the only remaining bring the final formula and definition of why this is so
Page 5
Part 1
in reality. What kind of mechanical motion that has not been formulated.? Of whether it is something illegal or extra-space action which we can not fathom any measure or still is something natural but not visible to this day.?
The solution was found in a single
COSMIC EQUATION
which all scientists on our planet Earth looking for.
E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C
Page 6
Part 1
The sensational discovery: Cosmic formula

Is well known that the electromagnetic ( EM ) wave extends free space ( vacuum ) in the maximum of the measured unit of ( constant ) speed of 299792458 m / s , we mean as the speed of light . Light is a wave and its true face is dark . So all EM waves at all frequencies and wavelengths in common is : c = speed 299972458m / s Photon as quantum carrier EM wave . Also known is that the transmitted EM wave expanding free space / time spherical source of oscillations as the electric field is perpendicular ( 90 ) to the magnetic field in the unit of time that determines its wavelength . All these facts proven and practical use of EM waves today, suggesting a lack of James C. Maxwell equations description of the EM wave and " mechanical " ( photon particles is not - why is mechanical in quotation marks. Hereinafter, only mechanical ) momentum of the photons as quantum carrier . For this reason, the lack of knowledge of the mechanical motion of photons ( but not only photons ) produced one of the greatest ( in my opinion ) the misconception that science is turned the wrong track is called " Hermann Minkowski definition of space / time so-called " or " Minkowski spacetime " published in 1906 the year in which attempts to explain the picturesque Albert Einstein's special theory of relativity ( STR ) . This error committed by Herman Minkowski I called "tensor separation volume in the classical area , " which was then popularly called " Minkowski tensor . " For these reasons mentioned above claim that mathematical or geometrical and quantum time looking perpendicular to the space and is inseparably one the other due to rotation or in other words, a photon is indivisible and no you can not stop its axis ( 0 ) - radial ( 90 ) rotation . It is evident therefore that in addition to these complex rotation of photons we have and its motion through space and all three speeds are identical c = 299792458m / s . Photon no idle and no attributes of particles (for now ). EM wave can therefore emit particles or when the particle is not the primary emitter EM wave than is the ( photon ) field of the EM wave . Let us look at " Herman Minkowski space" graphic display and you will notice three important things : In this view, the time is displayed as an independent dimension perpendicular to the square area ( 2D ) and in two directorates - the future and the past. This of course is not true of all the reasons described above and is completely incomprehensible . From this display is not visible wavelength or EM feature space / time ( photons ) and therefore no motion ( mean photon no idle) and not be seen therefore no electrostatic potential of the electric field acting on the point marked by an observer ( mass ) . The observer is placed in a square only space but not time to Albert Einstein's formula shows . Hence, as is evident during arises as the fourth independent dimension - which of course is not true . There is an obvious fallacy in the setting theory and mathematical approach to solving the problem and that is that the time is defined relative to the observer who is in space ( 3D ) and the same observer (matter ) can be passive ( idle) in relation to the space bounded or to move within it
Page 7
Part 1
( +1 D time dimension). In other words, it turns out that (vector) time dimension has only observer or matter.
Figure 1 : Minkowski space - ( " tensor separation volume in the classical area " ) Practically this model is inapplicable both theoretically and mathematically as described in the twodimensional space where the viewer will be given a third dimension ( eg height ) and awarded the independent fourth dimension of time with different signs ( past and future ) , depending on its motion (see at vectors of time that the opposite ) = . It was an absolute mistake . Now we can act as a second outside observer relative to the observer in the picture . Rotate this image so that "future light cone " is ahead us , a square space in the middle and "past light cone " is behind . Irresistibly it reminds us of the TV screen , the first observer is therefore in a square space and distance to us as a second observer measures the dimensions of time and distance in a given time , or simply just the speed of light . Entirely the wrong approach . It looks like the speed of light uniform velocity in
Page 8

I ask myself;
Part 1
physics that does the same root with other measurable speed particles or bodies and taken as a separate unit of measure. Which of course is not true.
Do Pythagorean theorem is not true in quantum physics for the combined units such as meter per second squared? As is known to describe a square area in square meters square but time is undefined theory. Why? Albert Einstein and Hermann Minkowski these years (approximately 1905-1906g). tortured by the curvature of space (diffraction of light - a mirage caused by subatomic particles and atoms of helium and hydrogen - Interference And the dual nature of the
wave.) This is one of the main reasons that made the 99 year old confusion in quantum physics and science took the blind track. The solution is sought in the crowd and explaining vector space and force still counting time as a separate dimension. (For now hopelessly how I manage media coverage) I realize then that the Pythagorean theorem and normally applicable in this case and the only one who can accurately and precisely mathematically (as Albert Einstein showed in the formula) to explain what space / time in the formula E = m * c . Square (arbitrarily defined) space will therefore always be an ideal flat surface and sides of the square will always be at right angles equal length. (of course if squared area does not meet the rules (+ holes, bumps, etc.) then you are no longer talking about a square of.)) Accordingly the time dimension still exists as for "unperceptible point" as well as for direction or certain superficial and also for the sphere as any bounded (or immaterial wave-particle- material) space.
Page 9
Part 1
It is mathematically ( Minkowski tensor ) incorrectly explainable as three dimensions plus one because " unperceptible point " photon - defined spatial and temporal dimension , and as such does not idle . So as I previously wrote space is perpendicular to the time quantum , mathematical , electromagnetic and geometric coordinate system - view. Evidence of this is found in the formula of EM wave propagation by way of its space in the formula = { ( c * 2 ) * } I 'll call it alternately rotatable magnetic field / wave - ARMF / W or ethereal field of photons . I'll try to explain this simple formula. As is well known by now the light is a wave and a photon is a quantum carrier of light and electromagnetic wave propagation in general . Speed of EM waves that we know today and generates a 299792458m / s . It is also known that every EM wave has a source to the quantum particle and macro scale , including here and our transmitters and antennas and through planets and stars etc. cognition EM waves and the knowledge of photon quantum carrier waves come to the following conclusion : EM wave spreads the speed of light from the source of circular oscillations in all directions in space . What really is nothing theoretically unknown but for a century and more to EM wave motion did not receive a formula and it is a key issue in my opinion . How would more clearly explain the formulas I will illustrate this more words . All EM waves therefore have the same speed of propagation due to photon . Thus a common speed is actually evidence of the existence of waves at all wavelengths and geometric representation in general use for the EM wave is sinusoidal . I implemented this model and the theory of the coordinate system and drew a sinusoid , the center ( origin ) marked as a source of radiation and drew a circle that defines a wave maximum and specific length wherever it was measured in the area at that radius . Mathematically it therefore seems very simple c / half- wave ( graphic = sinusoid ) or the two ( mathematical ) , multiplied with 3.141592 ( = graphical envelope ) ... and the cubic ( space ) ( mathematical ) thus yielding a three-dimensional spherical space / time from first ( graphic = line ) dimensions constant velocity c motion of photons . What is even more evident from this and irrefutably proven and practically confirmed that in this three-dimensional spherical display EM wave we see what the first dimension, the speed of movement in space we do not see and that is perpendicular to the magnetic field of the electric field of the wave. That same perpendicular just notice in Einstein's formula, where the time is perpendicular to the space ( c ) per Pythagorean interpretation of the speed of light . It is a complete analogy and proof one another formula in 2D and 3D dimensions. In other words, the space / time defines the photon and by analogy, the space / time of the EM wave / ( aether) photons in quantum field definition . Reverse engineering of energy massless photon and proves elementary subatomic particles in Joule's energy equation J = V * C = > E = { ( c * 2 ) * } * ( 4 * r ) . In accordance with this basic formula ( independent ) of subatomic particles continue to observe and accounts solely as energy ( eV ) spherical geometric shapes . ( their hypothetical mass can be calculated , but an important difference compared to atoms that are not affected by gravity . ) { ( c * 2 ) * } is a unit of cosmic dimensions ( m / s ) and voltage ( V ) of the EM wave propagation mode and the photon mass which is equal to zero . Accordingly A. Einstein's formula in this case with the
Page 10
Part 1
photon does not give the results by energy ( which is understandable and justified excludes ) , while in my formula found in entirely its role of quantum carrier EM wave propagation method and form, the potential in volts, confirm the Coulomb law of elementary charge, the evidence in the surface photoelectric effect, superconductivity ... Let us continue on this knowledge and the definition and recall the photoelectric effect or effects. Which says this: "The photoelectric effect or photo effects is a physical phenomenon in which the influence of electromagnetic radiation sufficiently short wavelengths (eg, in the visible or ultraviolet region of the spectrum) is coming to an outbreak of electrons from the illuminated material (usually metal). Radiation with a wavelength greater than the limit does not break out (photo) electrons, because the electrons can not get enough power for severing connection with the atom. "
This effect can be interpreted as the effect of surface waves , or even as the energy of the surface wave . If we consider experimentally proven effect which is noticed by Heinrich Herz 1887g . and he discovered if the electrodes are illuminated with ultraviolet radiation , easier to create a spark . For photo effects are needed photons potential of a few electron volts to over 1 MeV and chemical elements of high atomic number . As is evident from these findings is required potential of over 1MeV we can easily deduce from the formula and J = V * C ( J Joule unit of energy , the Coulomb C , and V is the volt . ) . As is widely known today, the experiment was carried out by external action of EM radiation on the chemical elements of high atomic number and observed the photoelectric effect or effect . Energy is the result of the action potential in the element . ( Albert Einstein in 1921g . Define the potential energy . E = h * f (where h is Planck's constant , f is the frequency )
Page 11
Part 1
By studying these phenomena I have concluded that the same effect or the effect can be achieved if I chemical elements high atomic number arouse ( inside) high AC voltage at its resonant frequency . Specifically talking about spherical metallic surfaces . To understand Joule's unit of energy from the above formula and the link with the effect of surface wave or surface wave energy coming to a conclusion and a simple formula . The energy of the surface wave { ( c * 2 ) * } em wave energy photons acting on a spherical surface of the particles ( 4 * r ) and vice versa - a particle radiates energy across its surface J=V*C. I conclude the following : The photon is " unperceptible point " in my definition of the wave { ( c * 2 ) * } , also electron elementary particle charge in the ( 4 * r ) . This is not just a simple explanation of the symbol in order to justify the only words I embellished the formula. As an illustration , when we had a copper ball painted bronze color that is conductive , under these " electric pressure" all bronze coat of paint would be gone, and not just a bronze coating and higher copper layers , the extreme " electrical pressure " ( the order of lightning ) photoelectrons can be thrown thousands of feet , and finally the whole copper ball can permanently disappear ( even in a split second). The first noticeable analogy of atoms and subatomic particles from cosmic bodies in this case, the planets and the stars in their spherical shape . It is at this analogy are the last hundred years, have worked all known physicists and scientists and one of the , in my opinion the most deserving of the Max Planck . I'll explain below why. According to this law, every body in the resonant frequency and the proportional voltage emitted photons or photoelectrons . It is this principle of law is applied Nikola Tesla 1899g in Colorado Springs on the patenting of wireless transmission of energy through the natural media, which I will write later . Let us return, therefore, on formula and the energy of the surface wave or how Nikola Tesla has called energy of scalar wave. . Elementary charge under the influence of voltage gives energy Joule's by law and therefore any ( n times ) elementary charge on the surface of a spherical body must simultaneously receive voltage ( over 1 MeV ) as the only possible wave resonance of the body . Then all elementary charges on the surface of the body emitted photoelectrons and the EM wave / field wavelengths corresponding to the length of the circumference of the body . So, this is all proven to date and this principle will be applied in defining the exact mass of the electron as a particle quantum carrier elementary charge . An electron in quantum physics and in general the most important particles found in two different states: integrated in an atom , an independent elementary particle And he actually limit " mathematical value " shall cease to apply where the laws of the material and begin to apply laws waveform. Hence it is actually created duality of electrons which I further described in the photoelectric effect. From this knowledge of the electron and its duality draw the line and do the border-electron core "size" of subatomic elementary "world" particles. According to him are all still mathematically determined (eV)
Page 12
Part 1
Picture: Displays the measurement of energy photoelectric effect in the range of audio "red laser " directed to a condenser microphone. Red laser (635 nm) 5mW, condenser microphone.
Page 13

Electron : Today official data and mathematical prediction of electrons looks like this : Electron radius " e " re = 2.817940289 E - 15 m Diameter = 5.635880579 E - 15 m Volume = 1.770564102 E - 14 m Area = 9.978684838 E - 29 m Weight = 9.10938215 E - 31 kg E = m * c = 8.187104382 E - 14 J 1e = 1.602176487 e - 19 C constant Coulomb 's constant = 8.987551787368176 s +9 N * m * c c = 299792458m / s - > c = 8.987551787368176 s +16 / c
Part 1
Compare and verify this information through the account . If the electron elementary charge of 1e = 1.602176487 e - 19C coulomb then there is something wrong with the calculations and here's why : c = 8.987551787e * 1e +16 * 1.602176487 E - 19 = 0.014399644 J ( 1 volt in a vacuum 1J / 1e elementary electron charge coulomb ) ! ? This is too much . Another check of the formula E = { ( c * 2 ) * } * ( 4 * r ) = > J = V * C E = 1.044291492 e +26 V e * 9.978687838 0.010420659 - 29C = J ! I find that this is too little but about precise . According to this conclusion is the following : " 1e " constant is unrealistic and completely inaccurate , and the second - " surface " of electrons is approximately highly accurate and meets the calculation to the fourth decimal. A more realistic constant elementary charge electrons would therefore 1e = 1.161930885 E - 19 C And from these constants can be calculated precisely radius of electrons : re = 2.820947793 e - 15 m area = 9.999999116 e - 29m ( I assumed that no electron is not perfect geometric shapes ) D = 5.641895587 e - 15 m diameter O = 1.772453773 E - 14 m scope Volume e = 9.403158478 e - 44 m
Page 14

1e=
C
Part 1
where my formula (c / 2 * ) is used for determination of the potential in joules J and the divisor-square speed of light c to determine that the same potential for one elementary charge (Coulomb). Which means that the Coulomb constant look like this: re / e-25 = 8.979355709 e +9 ke = 8.979355709 e +9 N * m * c Coulomb's constant, (Official = 8.987551787368176 s +9 N * m * c - obvious numerical approximation to the square of the speed of light)
Now calculate the capacity of elementary charge by the above formula : re = 2.820947793 e - 15 m q = 8.979355709 e +9 N * m * c e - 22pF or 22pF is 3.14159 - elemental capacity for one elementary charge , = 3.14159 ... ( I mentioned in the description of the formula, do you remember ? ) We can say : EM wave ( ( c * 2 ) * ) in a square space / time ( c ) determines the elementary charge ( C ) We defined electron and now leaves us to define a photon ( in formula ) with Planck constant and Dirack reduced Planck constant. How would all make sense and confirm formula calculations and further incorporates capacity ( C - Farad ) unperceptible hypothetical point of a photon in the formula : ( C / c ) * 2 = h = J * s ( I apply the same principle as in the calculation of the electron because duality of electrons as particles and waves - I will confirm that this is correct) Where: C equals 3.14159 - 26 nF c is equal 299792458 m/s 2 is equal to 6.283185307 dimensionless number h is equal Planck's constant
Page 15

J is equal to Joule unit of energy s equal to the second ( C*1e-1/c)*2=h=J*s ( e-26/299792458m/s)* 6.283185307=6.584291324e-34 J*s Planck's constant h= 6.584291324e-34 J*s =h/2 -> reduced Planck constant is: =1.047922511e-34 J*s
Part 1
As I stated above photon photon is indivisible and neither can stop its axis ( 0 ) - Radial ( 90 ) rotation . It is evident therefore that in addition to these complex rotation of photons we have and its motion through space and all three speeds are identical = 299792458m / s . Photon no idle and no known attributes of particles . EM wave can therefore emit particles or when the particle is not the primary emitter EM wave than is the ( photon ) field of the EM wave . As is known from the theory of the photoelectric effect and the kinetic energy of the electron discharge from the surface of the metal at a certain frequency ( UV ) . If this condition is not fulfilled electrons will be knocked out from the surface of the metal , although I still have the metal have its resonant frequency . So according to Albert Einstein's theory of photon E = h * f ( h is Planck's constant , f is the frequency ) is a packet of energy, and if energy photons ( A. Einstein called . Binding Work function or energy ) is not big enough of electrons will not happen than the electron will simply absorb the photon energy and keep a spin around the nucleus . The maximum kinetic energy of electrons : Ke = h * f - where is the energy required to knocked out electrons. What is finally back again proven in 1927 by Davisson and Germer 's experiment leakage of electrons through the crystal and certificate duality of electrons as waves . Consider once again this wavelength and energy formula to make things as clear as possible . The waves of the same wavelength in the phase amplitude is then amplified ( added together ) while the wavelength remains the same . But I figure this is not totally comprehensive because of the Doppler effect , which proves to be one wavelength of the wave decreases with distance but can be increased . This effect I've personally noticed in EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) communication EM wave reflection from the surface of the moon. As the moon moves relative to the Earth, there is a small Doppler shift in EME (Earth-Moon-Earth) signals. The amount of Doppler shift is proportional to the frequency. It is about 350 Hz maximum at 144 MHz, is different at higher frequencies. When the moon exiting , Doppler shift moves upward in frequency, reaching zero when the moon passes overhead, and then go negative when the moon goes towards sunset. Of course these are small distance relative to a distant star that send us the entire spectrum of EM radiation (signal) at far lower frequencies and extremely low frequencies but
Page 16
Part 1
what we receive from them is in the eye of the visible frequency range and above the x-ray, alpha and gamma . All this even more clearly confirms the photon as a quantum carrier of EM waves and amplitude gain (summation) of EM waves at all wavelengths. In other words we can say that the stars emit extreme low frequency with its total area where each packet energy photon maximum potential (eV). These data are very important and we note that in fact are very similar and minute differences Between electrons and photons . The difference is actually in the speed of movement of free electrons compared to photons due to its weight and its role in the gravity of the atom . ( I will describe later how and why ) E = { ( c * 2 ) * } * ( 4 * r ) = > J = V * C Recall once again the formula I interpret it from another point of view : We have a definition wave with - photon from one side I also have a surface particles , specifically talking about the electron, also defined with . This confirms once again the EM wave - as photon quantum carrier . And particles - electrons in the photoelectric effect and the duality of electrons in the minute their mutual geometric similarity . General : Energy ( J ) spatial field EM wave ( V ) acts on the surface of elementary particles ( C ) (I freely expanded in alternating rotary magnetic field -vacuum ( 4 ) ) . In other words photons are spread in alternating rotating magnetic field with speed of light . Photons ( e - 26 ) in free space which elementary particle ( e - 25 ) give the charge and resulting energy
.
Picture: Radiometer
Page 17

0 = 4107 Vs/(Am) 1.2566370614...106 Hm1 or NA2 or Tm/A or Wb/(Am) Vacuum or magnetic permeability of free space.
Part 1
Vacuum or magnetic permeability of free space is alternately a rotational magnetic field generated by the EM wave or photon {(c / 2) * } = 1.044291492e + 26 Volts assigned in 1.044291492e + 26 m / s vacuum (the universe). Let us continue with the calculation and physical constants as I have defined a new value of the electron, photon and Planck's constant. This will help to define the mass of the electron, which will be changed because of these new budget values. Physical constants of Planck units normalize the properties of free space.
MODIFIED CONSTANTS ARISING FROM TWO FORMULA E= m*c= kg*m*c & E={(c*2)*} *(4*r)=V*C =1.047922511e-34 J*s - The reduced Planck constant h=6.584291324e-34 J*s - Planck constant e=1.161930885e-19C eV =1.161930885e-19 J J=8.60636388e+18 eV (1/eV) ke=8.979355709 e+9 N*m*c c * 1e=0.01044291492J (These amounts are seen so far in the process described above, and move on with using the same Planck's formula ...) mass eV*c =1.292822464e-36 kg*m*s momentum eV*c =3.875784243e-28 kg*m*s
where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11m*kg*s
Planck mass mp = 2.169565295e-8 kg => 1.678161817e+19 GeV*c

Page 18

( mp *c = 2.169565295e-8 kg * 8.987551787e+16m/s=1949908044J -> =1.678161817e+19 or =
Part 1
Planck energy Ep= =mpc = 1949908045J or 1.949908045e+9J reduced Planckova mass = 3.347448511e+18 GeV*c- =>4.327656632 e-9 kg
Lp Planck length =
tp Planck time = 9.018802448 e-16 eV s tp Planck time =
= 5.374215024e-44 s
Distance = 2.703768954 *10-7 eV m E t = = Energy time c = Energy time velocity = Energy distance=270.376 MeV fm eV*Planck mass kg= 1.867206839 e+11 eV kg eV*Planck reduced mass kg=3.724538772 e+10 eV kg Ee reduc.=3.837117258e-13 kg*m/c
Page 19
Part 1
Here I've changed a couple of results under existing formulas and expressions arising from the new value. All these new values will be used in order to calculate the mass of the electron. The method of calculating the mass of the electron: I'll use the newly derived Planck mass mp=1.867206839 e+11 eVkg ili C*kg in formula of energy:
E= E=
->
electron ( eV ili e ) particles which has mass! ->
from this follows:
=J
(here do not do the abbreviation potential error) Let us recall : eVkg=8.60636388e+18J * 2.169565295e-8 kg = eVkg =C*kg
Simple separation energy of electron from joules energy per kilogram of elementary charge (eV=8.60636388e+18J ) I Planck mass ( mp=2.169565295e-8 kg) in unit energy of the electron: E= E=5.592799781e-14 J*eV*kg = kg*m*s
In accordance with this final mass of the electron is: Ee=5.592799782e-14 kg*m/c energy of electron according to E=m*c -> me= me=
=6.222828991e-31kg
me=6.222828991e-31kg mass of electron e
J.J.Thompson formula reads like this Incorporate new data into the formula:
=6.222828991e-31kg -mass of electron.
Page 20

The mystery of electron and its mass is finally resolved.
Part 1
I see that the results are starting to get along perfectly and to my formula proves Albert Einstein and Planck's formula. Let us remember this one more time: "The physical constants of Planck units normalize the properties of free space." As is well known Planck units defined time, length, mass, etc. I put all of the formulas in front of him and decided that something was missing. Gravity is there, electron and its energy is there, and a photon of light is there in the formulas and even entire space / time - but still something is missing!
Let's look at another Planck formula and conclude that it lacks.
where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11m*kg*s Planck lenght
tp=
Planck time
The inevitable conclusion is that I brought another one:
The sensational discovery: Planck's formula that lacks

Page 21
Part 1
Max Planck succeeded formulas normalize all the features of free space, but now it remains to formulate how the space affects all particles. We have seen so far and how I formulated and influences the electron. Taking everything into consideration and confirmation of previous formulas the results that I got, I conclude that lack magnetism in all so far known Planck formula. Of course, the permeability of the vacuum it comes as a cosmic constant and it is actually the one that is missing in the formula. Through constant magnetic vacuum'll find the answer to the question of the mass of the nucleus is thus electromagnetism in the interaction in an atom. 0 = 4107 Vs/(Am) 1.2566370614...106 Hm1 or NA2 or Tm/A or Wb/(Am) Vacuum or magnetic permeability of free space. A missing formula - (Planck) MASS of the nucleus
Pm nucleus pmn=
Of course you wonder from where this formula now?. Until now I have all the time explaining and applying external influences EM wave / field on the electron and the particle which is actually the outer shell of each atom. Is imposed question of how the same EM wave / field acting on the nucleus of the atom, or more precisely how the EM wave / field acts on the independent particles outside the nucleus of atoms - neutrons and protons. I think this is the only correct way so. reverse engineering or reverse engineering for each sub-atomic particle in particular. I will offer the following example, it makes sense when it comes to atomic (fine) structure.
Amending the definition: The fine structure constant (denoted by the Greek letter ) is one of fundamental physical constants. It belongs to the binding constants, because it describes the interaction, in this case gravity with electromagnetism in atoms. I have included the mass of the nucleus pmn and pm in formula: = to see the relationship between these two elemental mass:
Page 22

=0.007287814 => 1/ =137.215357 The fine structure constant is dimensionless number, dimensionless number, and it is, therefore, an amount equal to all measuring systems. This result is more than excellent and confirms both the elementary mass, one from gravity G , and another derived from magnetism 0.
Part 1
Pm nucleus pmn
Planck mass mp = 2.169565295e-8 kg "There are three equal definitions fine structure constant based on the other fundamental physical constants":
where: e is the elementary charge; H = h/2 the reduced Planck constant; c is the speed of light in a vacuum; 0 is the permittivity of vacuum, ie, the dielectric constant of vacuum; 8854 187 817e-12 F / m 0 is the permeability of vacuum; ke is the Coulomb constant.
In these definitions (three) we see attempts to describe interactions (elementary charge) electrons gravitate or spin around the nucleus at nearly the speed of light and influence of alternating rotating magnetic field in the core of electron. And it is significant that according to the 2006 CODATA (Committee on Data for Science and Technology, Committee on Data for Science and Technology), the recommended amount constant measured on the basis of an equal amount of : = 0.0072973525376 ili 1/0.0072973525376 =137.035999679
Page 23
Part 1
This official figure recommended by CODATA encouraged me to think it upwards published formulas (three formulas) I get different results when I use the new calculations that I have come. The calculations that occur inclusion of new values are in order: 0.003862354 first, - confirmation of this amount also get the formula qp= where : e-elementary charge = 1.161930885e-19C qp-Planck charge = 1.869623824e-18C 0.003858832 for the second and 0.0024267889 And for third formula. It is evident that all three formulas compromise made on the basis of official data of elementary charge and Coulomb's constant. I believe that my wording is correct and the closest amount adopted by CODATA.
Let us remember, then, I calculated the amount: =0.007287814 => 1/ =137.215357

qp= = =1.361073742e-18C
(one more)
The sensational discovery: The new formula and the amount of the unified atomic mass
How do I calculate the constant interaction of gravity GI magnetism 0 I will use the formula:
Page 24

=G * 0 where (new symbol) is the momentum of the fine structure constant. =G * 0 => (6.67428e-11) *(1.256637061e-6)= (7.034424497e-33) = 8.387147606e-17 kg*m*s
Part 1
pma=
pma I'll call Planck mass atom that lack.
Include therefore the new amount in the formula Planck mass of atoms:
pma=
pma=1.935386883e-5 kg*m*s (1m*kg*s or N*s) pma*J=1.935386883e-5 kg*m*s * 8.60636388e+18J=1.665664376e+14kg*m*s *eV
E=
=6.269518728e17 kg*m*s
= 2.091286342e-25
Page 25

unified atomic mass = momentum pma * the fine structure constant
Part 1
= 2.091286342e-25 =1.526085257e-27kg
* 0.007287814
(This mathematical procedure will cause the biggest storm in scientific circles)
Some (not) related calculations related for the momentum of the fine structure constant : = 8.387147606e-17 kg*m*s
= 1.192300466e+16 *c=0.132661318 =7.537992346 (Hz ? ) (0.994271565 shortening factor in relation to the planet
Earth frequency with ideal radius r=6366.1927724km?)
=109192511.9 qp= = =1.361073742e-18C
Checks new results through the formula: Planck momentum mpc= = =
= 6.504193127 kg*m*s
Page 26

=
Part 1
=6.504193127 kg*m*s
qp- Planck charge=
=1.869623824e-18C ->
=> =0.003862354
This constant will be valid for non-atomic structure - neutron formation - because it does not contain the gravitational constant.
Planck energy Ep=
=1.949908045e+9J = 1.678161817e+28eV
=mp*c = 1.949908045e+9J
Planck energy Ep= Planck voltage Vp=
= 1.432624835e+27V
=1.047922511e-34 J*s - Reduced Planck constant Lp Planck lenght = tp Planck time = 5.374215024e-44 s =299792458
Let's look at another formula and spatial definition of the EM wave / photon fields {(c * 2 ) * } and try to calculate from that space/time "space age" if we accept the theory of "big bang" seriously. 1.04291492e +26 m = 1.102382969e+10 light years According to this the cubic space sphere diameter 1.04291492e +26 meters converted from meters to light years (meter multiplied with 1.057020998e-16) is 11.02382969 billion light years.
Page 27
Part 1
The present alignment of practical measurement and mathematics show that "age of the universe" something bigger 13.8 billion. light years and suggest that the universe is expanding. The important thing in all this is that the speed of light does not change - so let's spread. Anyway, we're just with ours imagination and math tried to surround something that is unrestricted.
For the next series of test results obtained so far and the formula will calculate the energy of the planet Earth and its mass (virtual) comparing it with the ideal sphere of radius 6366197.724m. This looks like a mission impossible and some unsolvable task is not it? But I will show that it is no longer a problem because we have all the tools and levers of cosmic forces. The most basic thing we need is a cosmic formula:
E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C
And even the occasional bauble. Let us see what are the little things. I'll include them on top of that we had them on hand and an eye when computing. So I will use all the skills, laws and calculations for this difficult task.
Page 28
Part 1
Calculation: I put on top of everything we need to calculate this task. c=299792458 m*s r= 6366197.724m J=
eVkg =C*kg
Planck mass mp =2.169565295e-8 kg Planck mass = 1.292822464e-36 eV*c Planck energy Ep=1.949908045e+9J = 1.678161817e+28eV
procedure: (r*4) = 6366197.724m * 12.56637061=5.092958179e+14 m = C (c*2*) = 1.044291492e+26 m*s = V E=V*C=5.318532897e+40 J I calculated energy by Joules law, and therefore we can now calculate the mass from energy: Keep in mind that we get energy from the surface of elementary charge and all the electrons that make up the surface. To obtain the mass from the energy needed to convert the energy of the resulting mass of elementary particles in the following manner: = E=
=E
Basic energy of elementary particle = 2.84838979e+29 kg*m*s
Page 29

Now we have Joules energy total weight mass of elementary particles or electrons. We use Albert Einstein's formula:
Part 1
=m =>
= 3.16926106e+12 kg this is entirely mass of electrons.
And finally there are arranging a mass of electrons per kilogram C * kg particles or in our case the planet Earth. So pretend the total mass of electrons in the total mass of the body to satisfy Joule law and Einstein's formula: (as we know the mass of the electron are defined outside of the atom and now we must return to the atom and calculate the total mass (fine structure) particles or bodies.) It looks like this:
Mass of the planet Earth =3.16926106e+12 kg * E= 5.917665926e+23kg *
= 5.917665926e+23kg = 5.318532897e+40 J
These formulas, procedures and calculations as we know space and time has long been quantified (1918g - Max Planck) the Planck length and Planck time (m / s = 299 792 458),also Joule energy equation has been confirmed time and space (J = V * C ) and A.Einstein (1905g) formula (E = m * c ) proven all three dimensions only with photon and electron. However, to the knowledge of space and time and accurate results we need: COSMIC EQUATION
E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C
Page 30
Part 1
At the end of the first part of this book I will put special attention to: US patent 787412 - Art of transmitting electrical energy through the natural mediums. Nikola Tesla. For this patent quote: "The third most essential requirement is, however, that regardless of the frequency, wave or a "wave train" (scalar wave, gravity wave or standing wave) should continue to run a certain interval of time which should be not less than one twelfth or 0.08484 seconds and was passing to and return from the region diametrically opposite pole over surface, with an average speed of about 471240 km per second "NIKOLA TESLA US Patent 787.412. Here Nikola Tesla explains the third condition in the series, which is need to satisfy with the wireless transfer of energy through the natural media. It is really easy to explain this statement in the patent as it is well known today that the space is perpendicular on time, and vice-versa. Cognitionn of these endless natural rotation and spatial propagation of photons and electrons in space and time (wave and particle) or the rotation of electric and magnetic fields. Tesla uses this principle and formulate surface EM wave (c * 2) * in a different way not known to date . Which means that regardless of the frequency of the wave halved in two equal amplitute - positive and negative , ie. when viewed in a spherical shape that looks like a " wave train " that changes the polarization amplitude . In other words Tesla works disturbance in the gruound magnitude equal to the amplitude of the electric pressure in the air under the perpendicular geometry . This EM wave nullify itself in the knot. Yet from that point wider fluctuations in concentric circles (wavelength determined circles ) with speed c to the surface of the earth diametrically opposite pole where fully turned to ninety degrees and receiving device continues to amplify ( broadcast ) the same surface wave back to the transmitter. Can this be interpreted as diametrical spatial temporal inversion . Accordingly receiving devices can operate at higher odd harmonics frequency transmitter with a reduced effect , and of course the frequency of conditional nodes ( above mentioned circles) where the electric field alternates with magnetic 90 degrees in the ground and air . This is Tesla's key to success in the wireless transmission of energy through the natural media, and in fact the key to gravitational waves as we today call them . The complete formula based on the space-time wave propagation law is not only for the surface of the particles , but also for vacuum. I brought this 29.04.2013g . as follows : E ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =V*C=J E= m*c=kg*m*s=J
Page 31
Part 1
It seems that the (electro) magnetic pulse (cause) adequately challenged in the Earth is faster than the EM wave "c", which extends in (vacuum) or air ( like the consequences). Which is not weird and personally Tesla says "I do not do with Hertzian waves" but with "gravity waves". Gravitational waves SPECTACULAR discovered NIKOLA TESLA still in the his lab in Colorado Springs 1899y. and the practical application of gravitational waves he is demonstrated in 1902-1917 Wardencliff tower on Long Island. Support of this can also be invoked to the patent: US 6300614 B1Communication system using gravitational waves Who speaks the same as the previous, and I quote: "Communication system uses two pieces of superconducting material, the same size, weight and shape, means change the density of the first part of superconducting materials with variable frequency and detection means to determine the effect of gravitational wave pulses to said second piece of superconducting material."
End of the first part.

Page 32
Part 1
It is forbidden to unauthorized copying and reproduction, distribution, rental, loan, making them available to the public performance of the material or any portion thereof in for commercial purposes without prior consent of an authorized person Goran enanovi. All rights owner of the work reproduced reserved. Goran enanovi in Zagreb 16.03.2014.
Page 33

Genesis of Cosmic Equation - Part 1 First Edition. English Language

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Genesis of Cosmic Equation - Part 1 First Edition. English Language

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

The solution was found in a single

E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

The sensational discovery: Cosmic formula

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11m*kg*s

Planck mass mp = 2.169565295e-8 kg => 1.678161817e+19 GeV*c

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

tp Planck time = 9.018802448 e-16 eV s tp Planck time =

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

electron ( eV ili e ) particles which has mass! ->

from this follows:

me=6.222828991e-31kg mass of electron e

=6.222828991e-31kg -mass of electron.

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

Let's look at another Planck formula and conclude that it lacks.

where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11m*kg*s Planck lenght

The inevitable conclusion is that I brought another one:

The sensational discovery: Planck's formula that lacks

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

Let us remember, then, I calculated the amount: =0.007287814 => 1/ =137.215357

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

pma=1.935386883e-5 kg*m*s (1m*kg*s or N*s) pma*J=1.935386883e-5 kg*m*s * 8.60636388e+18J=1.665664376e+14kg*m*s *eV

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

=109192511.9 qp= = =1.361073742e-18C

Checks new results through the formula: Planck momentum mpc= = =

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

qp- Planck charge=

Planck energy Ep=

Planck energy Ep= Planck voltage Vp=

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

Basic energy of elementary particle = 2.84838979e+29 kg*m*s

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

= 3.16926106e+12 kg this is entirely mass of electrons.

Mass of the planet Earth =3.16926106e+12 kg * E= 5.917665926e+23kg *

E= m*c ={(c*2)*} *(4*r) =kg*m*s=V*C

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

End of the first part.

GNESIS OF COSMIC EQUATION

Вам также может понравиться

E= mc ={(c2)} (4r) =kgms=VC

E= mc ={(c2)} (4r) =kgms=VC

where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11mkgs

where G is the gravitational constant 6.67428e-11mkgs Planck lenght

pma=1.935386883e-5 kgms (1mkgs or Ns) pmaJ=1.935386883e-5 kgms * 8.60636388e+18J=1.665664376e+14kgms *eV

E= mc ={(c2)} (4r) =kgms=VC

Basic energy of elementary particle = 2.84838979e+29 kgms

E= mc ={(c2)} (4r) =kgms=VC