The problem Everyone needs energy from fossil fuels in one form or another.

They are what keeps us mobile through combustion engines and through electricity generation, they power the gadgets and appliances that have improved our quality of life greatly from something as simple as a light bulb to a supercomputer. By far the greatest primary source of energy used in the world is fossil fuel (coal, oil and natural gas). Oil remains the world leading energy source accounting for 33% of global energy consumption in 2012 followed by coal at 30% and natural gas at 24%. The rest is split up between hydro, nuclear and other renewables (e.g. biofuel) as shown in Figure 1. The bulk of the primary sources of energy are predominantly used in electricity generation. This means in the pursuit to solve any issues with primary energy use and sustainability it is essential to scrutinize electricity generation. As shown in Figure 2, 67.4% of electricity generation was done using fossil fuels in 2010. Irrespective of the economic benefits of fossil fuels, the environmental impact, especially that coming from carbon dioxide emissions, is impossible to overlook. Fossil fuels are carbon based fuel sources which release mainly carbon dioxide when they go through combustion. Carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas which means it absorbs and emits radiation within the thermal infrared range in the atmosphere. This process is what keeps earth at a relatively cool temperature. Carbon dioxide makes up almost 80% of anthropogenic (manmade) greenhouse gas emissions. Over the last century the amount of CO2 in the atmosphere has risen, largely driven by fossil fuel use but also because of land use change and deforestation. Atmospheric concentrations of CO2 have increased by 35% since the industrial revolution. It has been confirmed by various well respected research groups and institutions as shown in FIGURE () that global warming is occurring due to human an activity. Evidence of global warming can also be seen in the extreme weather events which have been occurring all over the world in the past decade. The other issue with fossil fuels is their non-renewable nature. From current estimates oil, coal and gas will run out in approximately 52.9, 109 and 55.7 years respectively if energy consumption follows the current trend. Even with these issues, a sustainable energy future will require using all the resources available to us over the short, medium and long term. At the same time, it means producing and utilising all these energy sources in a way that minimises adverse impacts on the environment and maximises economic and social benefit. To make this possible new oil, coal and gas extraction techniques are being developed alongside a rapidly developing renewable energy industry. Various technologies are also being developed to tackle the release of the other by-products of fossil fuel combustion which are also pollutants. By-products such as oxides of sulphur (SOx) and nitrogen (NOx) and particulate and trace elements, such as mercury. Coal has long dominated as the main fuel for electricity. It has been the fastest growing energy source in the last decade and this is largely driven by the growth of developing economies, mainly China. In 2012 China alone accounted for 50.2% of global coal consumption. It is so popular because Coal is the most prevalent and widely distributed fossil fuel, accounting for 64% of globally economically recoverable fossil resources compared to 19% oil and 17% natural gas. Coal is recoverable across every continent and every region which provides energy security across broad political arenas. Coals abundance and distribution, coupled with its relatively low and stable price pattern makes it a reliable supply of energy. It is a very attractive base load fuel. This means electricity generated from electricity is one of the first sources to be dispatched throughout the electric grid. Super critical coal fire power plants are one of the most affordable methods of power generation in China, costing USD 33/MWh compared to USD 50 for hydro, USD 53 for nuclear and USD 71 for wind.

Even though the market price of coal is low, the true cost is reflected in its impact on the environment and humans. To assess the true cost of coal you have to look at the supply chain, ie the mining of coal, the burning and the disposal of by-products. The mining causes widespread deforestation due to the excavation, soil erosion and pollution. Miners also suffer from Coal Workers Pneumoconiosis, colloquially known as black lung disease. Working in a coal mine overtime will lead to the accumulation of dust in the lungs which will cause many health problems. The combustion of coal releases more of the anthropogenic CO2 released into the atmosphere than any other fossil fuel along with other fossil fuels. These include sulphur and nitrogen oxides and particulate trace elements such as mercury. These pollutants when released lead to the formation of photochemical smog and acid rain. The key to tackling this issue would be to develop highly effective technologies to minimise these impacts. The waste from coal combustion known collectively as Coal Combustion Wastes (CCW). These are mostly ash which is toxic and often laced with lead, arsenic and cadmium. When placed in a landfill, these can seep into the ground and contaminate ground water. The answer to solving these issues will come through the development of efficient technologies which reduce the waste produced at each stage and neutralise the adverse environmental impact. By making electricity generation more efficient the amount of coal per megawatt will be reduced which in turn would reduce the effect of coal on the environment. Current Pulverised coal fired plants (PCF) are mostly sub-critical power plants. Significant efficiency improvements and reduction in CO2 can be achieved if these are replaced by higher efficiency supercritical (SC) and ultrasupercritical plants (USC) which operate at higher pressure and temperatures. Another alternative would be Integrated Gasification Combined cycle plants (IGCC) which also offer improved efficiency. IGCC plants use a gasifier to convert coal to syngas, which drives a combined cycle turbine. The average PCF plant efficiency is currently 33% compared to 45% for the more efficient SC, USC and IGCC plants. Highly efficient modern power plants also emit up to 40% less CO2 than the previous coal plants. As a result improving the efficiency of the oldest and most inefficient plants would reduce CO2 emissions from call use by 27% representing nearly a 7% reduction in global CO2 emissions. With greater efficiency, comes greater running cost but the benefits to the environment outweigh this. These plants are also easier to fit with carbon capture and storage technology (CCS) which can reduce CO2 emissions to the atmosphere by 80-90%. This involves capturing CO2 that would otherwise be released to the atmosphere and injecting it to be stored in deep geographical formations as shown in Figure (). There are several ways to carry out carbon capture. Post combustion directly separating CO2 from regular flue gas after the combustion process at the emission source. The flue gas is cooled and treated to remove particulate matter. Once cooled, the gas enters an absorber which consists of a liquid solvent (usually chilled ammonia) which absorbs the CO2. The CO2- rich solution is then sent to a stripper where it is separated into two gases: the pure amine gas, which is recycled into the stripper and a CO2 stream which is then dehydrated, compressed and sent to storage. Pre- combustion carbon and hydrogen are separated prior to combustion. In this process, air is purified to extract pure oxygen (O2). The O2 is then sent to the gasifier where it reacts with the fuel source (coal) to create a synthesis gas, or syngas. The syngas is purified which leaves a mixture of hydrogen (H2) and carbon monoxide (CO). Steam is then added to a shift reactor which converts the CO to CO2 and H2. The H2 gas stream can be burned cleanly to produce steam to run the turbines for electricity generation. The pure CO2 stream is then dehydrated, compressed and sent to storage. Oxyfuel Combustion also involves purifying the air to extract pure O2. The coal is then combusted with pure O2 which is used to create steam to run the turbines for electricity

generation. The flue gas produced will have a very high concentration of CO2 due to the absence of nitrogen (N2). This can then be captured as in post combustion capturer then stored. Post combustion and oxyfuel capture can be retrofitted to existing power stations and new power plants constructed over the next 10-20 years. Pre combustion on the other hand requires utilising IGCC which makes coal potentially more flexible because the hydrogen used can also be used in hydrogen fuel cell transportation. After the capture of the CO2 the storage becomes the next issue to deal with. The geographical features being considered for CO2 storage fall into three categories; deep saline formations, depleted oil and gas fields and unmineable coal seams. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) special report on carbon capture and storage found that the risk of leakage was very likely to be less than 1 % over 100 years. Deep saline formations Very large, porous rock formations typically atleast 800m below the surface and containing water that is unusable because of its high mineral content and/or salt. This saltwater is around 10 times saltier than ocean water and its trapped by impermeable rock called cap rock for millions of years. CO2 injected into the formation is contained beneath the cap rock and over time it will dissolve into the saline water. Saline formations have the largest storage potential but are the least well explored. Depleted Oil and Gasfields well explored and have proven ability to store hydrocarbons over a long period of time. CO2 is already widely used in Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) from mature oil fields. Injecting CO2 into an existing oil field reduces the oils viscosity making it flow easier, and also acts as a pressurising agent pushing more oil out of the rock. In EOR, the CO2 can therefore have a positive commercial value. Unmineable coal seams when the CO2 is injected into the seam it is adsorbed by the coal in preference to other gases e.g. methane which are displaced. This is feasible when used in conjunction with Enhanced Coal Bed Methane (ECBM) because the methane released can be captured and used as a very clean fuel source. CCS has great potential in creating a sustainable energy future but it is still a relatively new field which still requires a lot of research and development. The first commercial example was setup as recent as 2000 in Weyburn oil field in Midale, Canada. Table () shows the different stages each aspect of CCS is on in developmental terms. Carbon capture can also be used in any fossil fuel power plant such as natural gas plant. Natural gas has been widely discussed as a less carbon- intensive alternative to coal. It is the second most used fuel source having a 22.2% share in electricity generation. Coal production in 2012 increased by only 2.5% (lower than the usual trend) which is mostly due to a large increase of natural gas consumption of 4.1% in the US. Combustion of natural gas to release around 50% less CO2 than coal per unit of electricity output and significantly less SO2 which means before the wider implementation of CCS, natural gas is a better option for electricity generation. In 2008, in the US only 21% of natural gas fired electricity was generated by steam turbine plants and simple cycle turbine plants which are relatively inefficient. 79% was produced by combined turbine plants, which use waste heat to run steam turbines boasting efficiencies on average 49% which is much higher than coal plants. It is widely considered as a potential bridge fuel for addressing climate change and transitioning into a future powered by low-carbon renewables. An issue could be the possibility

of natural gas running out but new gas extraction techniques are being developed to allow access to this cleaner source of fuel. The main method which has been in news headlines recently is hydraulic fracturing also known as fracking. Fracking gives us access to previously uneconomical shale gas which is just natural gas that is trapped within shale formations. Shales are fine-grained sedimentary rocks that can be rich sources of natural gas. Shown in figure ()Fracking is a technique in which water, chemicals and sand are pumped into a these shales to unlock the hydrocarbons trapped in shale formations by opening cracks (fractures) in the rock and allowing natural gas to flow from the shale into a well. It is necessary to use fracking in conjunction with horizontal drilling because shale gas does not usually flow to the well rapidly and commercial quantities cannot be produced, fracking makes the rapid flow possible. However, there are some environmental issues which are associated with fracking. Firstly, fracturing wells require large amounts of water and this significant use of water may lead to water shortages and it may affect aquatic life. Second, if not managed properly, hydraulic fracturing fluid, which contains hazardous chemicals such as lead or radium, can be released leaks or spills. Fracking also produces large amounts of waste water, which may contain dissolved chemicals and other contaminants that would require treatment before disposal. Lastly, fracking causes small earthquakes, but these are almost always too small to cause concern. Along with natural gas, fracking fluids and formation water are returned to the surface. These waters have to be injected back into the deep wells which can cause earthquakes large enough to be felt and may cause damage. If extraction methods are made safer, natural gas electricity generation could be a method of slowing down climate change. Another option would be to eliminate carbon dioxide completely and use renewable energy such as biofuels, solar, hydro or wind generated electricity. Although the adoption is on the rise in the developed world. Many developing countries will opt for fossil fuels because theyre cheaper to produce. Others like solar and wind farms also require land which could be used for farming purposes. Solar and wind energy is also not consistent so storage methods will need to be developed. One of the storage methods being developed acquires inspiration from plants. This is called the artificial leaf concept. Instead of using photocells to generate electricity directly from sunlight, you deploy a chemical reaction that stores solar energy in the form of hydrogen, which you can then use in a hydrogen fuel cell to generate electricity. This is still in the developmental stage and the main issue is in trying to find a combination of materials that give you a cost effective reaction. These carbon neutral electricity generation methods are in no doubt the key to tackling climate change but a lot of research is necessary to make them a sustainable energy source. It is perhaps the reason to consider separate primary energy which doesnt produce greenhouse gases, nuclear energy. Global nuclear output fell by 6.9% in 2012, the largest decline on record, mostly due to and 89% decline in nuclear output in Japan. This happened due to a tsunami which devastated japan and cause a meltdown at the Fukushima plant. One year after the disaster all 52 nuclear reactors were shut down leaving only 2. Authority to restart these power plants was given to the local governments but in all case they decided against it. This was heavily due to public opinion. Problems with nuclear power include the possibility of these accidents, radioactive waste disposal and the possibility of terrorist attack, which would occur due to terrorists stealing the enriched nuclear materials. This has led to Germany deciding to close all its reactors by 2022 and Italy banning nuclear power completely. Nuclear power is also relatively expensive and the decommissioning of a plant can take years.

All these issues stem from the materials used as a fuel source. Todays light water reactors use thermal energy produced from the fission uranium (U-235). The Enrichment of U-235 releases U-238 as a by-product and this is currently set aside as waste. A company called TerraPower are currently in the development stages of a travelling wave reactor (TWR) which uses this U-238 as its fuel source. For conventional nuclear energy plants, U-235 is used because U-238 is considered too weak of an energy source. TerraPowers engineers discovered a method to extract the latent energy from U-238, making it a perfect source of energy for the TWR. The poorly splitting isotope of uranium (U238) can be converted to easily splitting plutonium given the investment of a single neutron. When a second neutron comes around, the newly transformed plutonium will readily split and produce energy. While this concept is used by breeder reactors via recycling, TWRs do not require the plutonium to be removed from the reactor and refabricated into new fuel. The power effectively moves from the part of the core thats active to the part of the core that has just produced enough fuel to sustain a chain reaction. A travelling wave reactor can run for 40+ years without refuelling, produces 7 times less waste and rely on natural physics for safe shut down without human involvement. This will also reduce the waste from the nuclear legacy of the word. The travelling wave reactor is not the only nuclear technology being considered for providing energy in the future. There are other types of fast breeder reactors being considered such as the thorium fuel reactors and high temperature reactors such as molten salt reactors (MSRs) and others. Each of the alternatives offers a different set of advantages, including improved safety, reduced waste, less risk of weapons proliferation, and improved operating efficiencies. Nuclear fusion could even be on the cards in the future. The National Ignition Facility (NIF) in California USA in 2013was the first facility to achieve an important milestone in the commercialisation of fusion by producing more energy than the energy applied. With more research and development into nuclear technology it could be a sustainable energy source for the future.