Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1.2.1 What systems are in place to ensure colorectal patients are identified for the L.E.A.R.N.S program? 1.2.2 What steps are taken to ensure attendance by family/caregiver member at the pre-clinic appointment? 1.2.3 What actions are taken by the clinician and volunteer to develop a partnership with the patient and family?
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
1.5.1 How does the staffing model support the program? 1.5.2 To what extent does the combination of clinic staff and volunteers support the delivery of the program on a daily basis? 1.5.3 To what extent to the patient information materials support the delivery of the program?
1.9 Communication/marketing
1.9.1 What communication plan has been developed to market the program? 1.9.2 What involvement have the stakeholders had in preparing the communication plan? 1.9.3 What is the appropriateness and satisfaction level among stakeholders?
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
2.0 Implementation
2.1 Assessment First 5 risk factors 2.1.1 What relevant assessment tools are available to the staff? 2.1.2 Who is responsible for completing the assessment? 2.1.3 How are the results of an assessment conveyed to other team members? 2.1.4 How comprehensive is the assessment in identifying the patients needs? Utilization of assessment tools. Evidence that assessment tools are being completed correctly and by the appropriate person. Assessment information is documented. Expectations of assessment communication are outlined in policies and procedure manual. Number of assessments completed. Evidence of care plans and referrals that address needs. Assessment tools Patient chart Care plans Policy and procedure manuals Computer administrative system Staff Patients
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
2.3.1 What is the process for making a referral? 2.3.2 What factors help or hinder the process to make appropriate referrals?
Chart audits Staff Patients and family 30-day post-surgical phone call Primary care provider Chart audits Various College standards of documentation Hospital policy regarding documentation Care plans Observation of team meetings/rounds
2.4 Documentation
2.4.1 What types of information is documented? 2.4.2 Who is expected to document information? 2.4.3 How is the documentation used to inform other teams or clinics?
Documentation reflects use of assessment tools. Documentation follows professional standards and best practices. Documentation identifies individual patient needs. Number of times other teams review documentation. Reinforcement process Issue identification
2.5.1 How was education reinforced? 2.5.2 What factors facilitated or created barriers in their reinforcement?
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
3.0 Activities/Outputs
3.1 Knowledge transfer and facilitated patient centred learning 3.1.1 How was knowledge transferred? Was it effective? 3.1.2 How was learning facilitated? Did intended learning take place? 3.2.1 What other health care services were used by patients? Were they appropriate? Did they relate to the action plan developed? 3.2.2 To what extent were other health care services used by patients? Why were those particular health care services used by patients? 3.2.3 What was criterion for referrals to health care services and recommendations to supportive services? 3.3.1 What other health care services were used by patients? Were they appropriate? 3.3.2 To what extent were other health care services used by patients? Why were those particular health care services used by patients? 3.4.1 Did communication take place between the patient and PCP? What helped to facilitate this and what were the barriers? 3.4.2 How did communication with PCP take place? How often? # of contacts between patient and PCP Barriers/facilitators to communication Letter to patient PCP Clinic call/appointment log Evidence of staff/volunteer teaching Evidence of patient/family ability to teach back # of other health care services used and types Views on appropriateness Reason(s) for choice(s) Care plans/Chart audits Patient and Family focus group Medical record Patient and family survey Family
3.2 Patient use of health care services (referred) and recommended supportive services
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
3.7.1 Were the calls made? How many phone calls made to patients were answered or not answered? Number of attempts to each patient?
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
4.2.1 How well did patients understand their individual First 5 information? 4.2.2 To what extent were patients able to make decisions about next steps for their health and act on that decision? 4.2.3 What factors facilitated or hindered effective health communication?
Organizational Patient satisfaction survey Patient & family focus group Staff and volunteer survey Staff and volunteer focus group 30 day post-op phone call PFE consult database
4.3.1 To what extent did patients believe that they could independently prepare themselves for surgery? 4.3.2 What facilitated/ motivated patient belief that they could optimize their own health? What were the barriers to improved self-efficacy?
30 day post-op phone call Patient Self-efficacy survey Patient & family focus group
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
4.5.1 What has participation in the program done for the patients access to supportive services? 4.5.2 How was access to system supports given? 4.5.3 What was the time period to access these services before surgery? 4.5.4 Which supports were used? 4.5.5 What facilitated/ barred patient access to supportive systems and services?
First 5 documentation Clinic appointment logs 30 day post-op phone call Patient and family Library patron data
4.6.1 How were patient and family expectations and preparation skills affected by the program? 4.6.2 To what extent did patients perceive that they knew what to expect during their surgical experience? 4.7.1 What was the extent of impact of pre-operative health status on surgical scheduling?
30 day post-op phone call discharge survey Patient & family focus group Operating Room Database
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
Average patient length of stay (LOS) Frequency of phone calls to navigator from baseline Frequency of phone calls to surgeons from baseline # of extra surgeon appointments required prior to standard 6 week post-surgical follow up visit
Discharge survey NSQIP database Electronic patient records Nurse navigator phone consult logs Surgeon administrative assistant phone logs 30 day post op phone call Patient & Family focus group
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
6.4.1 To what extent has the program impacted health education in other surgical services received by the patient?
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
10
SEEKers L.E.AR.N.S. First 5 Surgical Patient Education Program Data Collection Matrix, March 24, 2014
11