Lars L. Andersen, Jesper L. Andersen, S. Peter Magnusson, Charlotte Suetta, Jrgen L. Madsen, Lasse R.

Christensen and Per Aagaard

You might find this additional information useful... This article cites 54 articles, 17 of which you can access free at: http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/99/1/87#BIBL

J Appl Physiol 99:87-94, 2005. First published Feb 24, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2005

This article has been cited by 7 other HighWire hosted articles, the first 5 are: Local NSAID infusion inhibits satellite cell proliferation in human skeletal muscle after eccentric exercise U. R. Mikkelsen, H. Langberg, I. C. Helmark, D. Skovgaard, L. L. Andersen, M. Kjaer and A. L. Mackey J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2009; 107 (5): 1600-1611. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Effect of contrasting physical exercise interventions on rapid force capacity of chronically painful muscles L. L. Andersen, J. L. Andersen, C. Suetta, M. Kjaer, K. Sogaard and G. Sjogaard J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2009; 107 (5): 1413-1419. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Effect of physical training on function of chronically painful muscles: a randomized controlled trial L. L. Andersen, C. H. Andersen, M. K. Zebis, P. K. Nielsen, K. Sogaard and G. Sjogaard J Appl Physiol, December 1, 2008; 105 (6): 1796-1801. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Changes in muscle size and MHC composition in response to resistance exercise with heavy and light loading intensity L. Holm, S. Reitelseder, T. G. Pedersen, S. Doessing, S. G. Petersen, A. Flyvbjerg, J. L. Andersen, P. Aagaard and M. Kjaer J Appl Physiol, November 1, 2008; 105 (5): 1454-1461. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Increased central facilitation of antagonist reciprocal inhibition at the onset of dorsiflexion following explosive strength training S. S. Geertsen, J. Lundbye-Jensen and J. B. Nielsen J Appl Physiol, September 1, 2008; 105 (3): 915-922. [Abstract] [Full Text] [PDF] Updated information and services including high-resolution figures, can be found at: http://jap.physiology.org/cgi/content/full/99/1/87 Additional material and information about Journal of Applied Physiology can be found at: http://www.the-aps.org/publications/jappl

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

This information is current as of August 27, 2010 .

Journal of Applied Physiology publishes original papers that deal with diverse areas of research in applied physiology, especially those papers emphasizing adaptive and integrative mechanisms. It is published 12 times a year (monthly) by the American Physiological Society, 9650 Rockville Pike, Bethesda MD 20814-3991. Copyright 2005 by the American Physiological Society. ISSN: 8750-7587, ESSN: 1522-1601. Visit our website at http://www.the-aps.org/.

J Appl Physiol 99: 8794, 2005. First published February 24, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2005.

Changes in the human muscle force-velocity relationship in response to resistance training and subsequent detraining
Lars L. Andersen,1,2 Jesper L. Andersen,2 S. Peter Magnusson,1 Charlotte Suetta,1 Jrgen L. Madsen,2 Lasse R. Christensen,2 and Per Aagaard1
Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen/Team Danmark Testcenter, Bispebjerg Hospital, and 2Copenhagen Muscle Research Center, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen, Denmark
Submitted 26 January 2005; accepted in nal form 22 February 2005
1

Andersen, Lars L., Jesper L. Andersen, S. Peter Magnusson, Charlotte Suetta, Jrgen L. Madsen, Lasse R. Christensen, and Per Aagaard. Changes in the human muscle force-velocity relationship in response to resistance training and subsequent detraining. J Appl Physiol 99: 8794, 2005. First published February 24, 2005; doi:10.1152/japplphysiol.00091.2005.Previous studies show that cessation of resistance training, commonly known as detraining, is associated with strength loss, decreased neural drive, and muscular atrophy. Detraining may also increase the expression of fast muscle myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms. The present study examined the effect of detraining subsequent to resistance training on contractile performance during slow-to-medium velocity isokinetic muscle contraction vs. performance of maximal velocity unloaded limb movement (i.e., no external loading of the limb). Maximal knee extensor strength was measured in an isokinetic dynamometer at 30 and 240/s, and performance of maximal velocity limb movement was measured with a goniometer during maximal unloaded knee extension. Muscle cross-sectional area was determined with MRI. Electromyographic signals were measured in the quadriceps and hamstring muscles. Twitch contractions were evoked in the passive vastus lateralis muscle. MHC isoform composition was determined with SDS-PAGE. Isokinetic muscle strength increased 18% (P 0.01) and 10% (P 0.05) at slow and medium velocities, respectively, along with gains in muscle cross-sectional area and increased electromyogram in response to 3 mo of resistance training. After 3 mo of detraining these gains were lost, whereas in contrast maximal unloaded knee extension velocity and power increased 14% (P 0.05) and 44% (P 0.05), respectively. Additionally, faster muscle twitch contractile properties along with an increased and decreased amount of MHC type II and MHC type I isoforms, respectively, were observed. In conclusion, detraining subsequent to resistance training increases maximal unloaded movement speed and power in previously untrained subjects. A phenotypic shift toward faster muscle MHC isoforms (I 3 IIA 3 IIX) and faster electrically evoked muscle contractile properties in response to detraining may explain the present results. myosin heavy chain; twitch
PREVIOUS STUDIES HAVE INVESTIGATED

heterogeneity in terms of contractile properties between different muscle ber types is well known. Thus a tight coupling exists between myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoforms and unloaded velocity of muscle ber shortening in vitro (16, 17, 33, 43). On the molecular level, cessation of resistance training produces a shift toward the fast type IIX phenotype (54) that may even reach levels exceeding those present before training (8). Consequently, a faster muscle contractile behavior may be expected with detraining subsequent to resistance training. However, during maximal unloaded movements, the functional benet of this ber-type transformation may be overruled by muscular atrophy, decreased muscle strength, and decreased neural drive. The effect of detraining on maximal unloaded limb movement speed and power has not been examined previously. It can be hypothesized that motor tasks involving maximal movement speed and negligible external resistance (e.g., kicking, punching, smashing) would be enhanced with detraining in consequence of a faster muscle ber-type composition. The aim of the present study was to examine the effect of detraining subsequent to resistance training on slow-tomedium-velocity isokinetic muscle strength vs. performance of maximal-velocity unloaded limb movement. Muscle crosssectional area (CSA), agonist and antagonist electromyographic (EMG) activity, evoked muscle twitch characteristics, and MHC isoform composition were obtained to elucidate the mechanism of the underlying adaptation.
METHODS

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

Subjects Fourteen healthy sedentary male subjects (age 23.6 3.1 yr, stature 179 8 cm, body mass 75.8 8.5 kg, means SD) participated in the training study. Furthermore, 10 subjects (age 23.9 3.1 yr, stature 181 8 cm, body mass 76.0 5.0 kg) served as control group. None of the subjects had previously participated in regular resistance training, and none of the subjects had participated in regular exercise within the last year before entering the study. Most subjects used a bicycle for daily transportation (10 20 min per day). All subjects gave written, informed consent to participate in the study, which was approved by the local Ethics Committee (KF-01-010/01). Resistance Training Resistance training was performed for 3 mo with 38 sessions evenly dispersed, followed by 3 mo of detraining ( no training). The training program consisted of four to ve sets of incline leg press,

various physiological effects of detraining subsequent to resistance training. Reductions in maximal muscle strength (20, 31, 35, 49), muscular peak power production (41, 47), muscle size (8, 34, 49), and neural drive to the muscle (29, 31, 49) have been reported. Thus detraining from the trained state is generally associated with a decline in physiological muscle function. Alterations in muscle ber-type composition also occur when resistance training is followed by detraining (8, 54). The

Address for reprint requests and other correspondence: L. L. Andersen, Institute of Sports Medicine Copenhagen/Team Danmark Testcenter, Bispebjerg Hospital, Build. 8, 2nd oor, DK-2400 Copenhagen (E-mail: ll_andersen@yahoo.dk). http://www. jap.org

The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. The article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact. 87

8750-7587/05 $8.00 Copyright 2005 the American Physiological Society

88

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

hack squat, isolated knee extension, and hamstring curl. All exercises were performed in a traditional manner using cyclic concentric and eccentric muscle contractions, i.e., raising and lowering the weight stack in a controlled manner without pause or breaks. In the early training phase (sessions 115) exercises consisted of 10 12 repetition maximum (RM) loads (4 sets), followed by 8 10 RM loads (4 sets) in the midphase (sessions 16 25), and heavier loads of 6 8 RM (5 sets) in the later phase (sessions 26 38) (8). Absolute training loads were progressively increased to maintain relative loadings at the intended level. To ensure adequate training load and intensity, all training sessions were surveyed and supervised by the authors of the study. Detraining from Resistance Training The period of resistance training was followed by 3 mo of detraining. The subjects were instructed to return to their usual lifestyle and level of physical activity during this period. Muscle Strength Testing Isokinetic dynamometry was used to evaluate concentric moment of force at angular velocities of 30 and 240/s for the knee extensors of the right leg (Kinetics Communicator, Chattecx, Chattanooga, TN) (5). Range of motion was 10 to 90 anatomical knee joint angle (0 full extension). Successive maximal trials were performed, separated by rest periods of at least 45 s until peak moment could not be improved any further, which was usually achieved within 6 8 maximal attempts. Dynamometer strain gauge and lever arm position signals were sampled synchronously at 1,000 Hz using an external analog-to-digital-converter (DT9804, Data Translation, Marlboro, MA). During ofine analysis, the dynamometer force and lever arm position signal were digitally low-pass ltered with a 15- and 8-Hz cutoff frequency, respectively. Subsequently, the moment of force signal was corrected for the effect of gravity (7). The average moment exerted in the 60 80 interval was calculated. The rationale for choosing this knee joint angle interval was that the highest moment of force occurred in this particular range of motion. Maximal Unloaded Knee Extension Angular velocity, acceleration, moment of force, and power development during maximal unloaded knee extension were determined on the basis of goniometry and classical biomechanical principles. A exible goniometer (Penny & Giles, Christchurch, Dorset, UK) was positioned laterally at the right knee joint. Subjects were seated in a rigid chair with the backrest 10 reclined. The leg was strapped at the distal part of the thigh and hip to exclude movements of the hip joint. The lower leg was allowed to move freely. Subjects were instructed to extend their right knee as fast as possible into a rm foam pillow. The movement range was from 90, which was the relaxed starting position, to 510 from full extension. Ten maximal unloaded knee extensions were performed separated by rest periods of 30 s. Trials with a visible countermovement were discarded. Goniometer position signals were sampled at 1,000 Hz (DT9804, Data Translation). During ofine analysis, the goniometer position signal was digitally low-pass ltered at a cutoff frequency of 10 Hz using a fourth-order zero phase lag Butterworth lter (62). The goniometer position signal was differentiated to obtain knee extension angular velocity ( dposition/ dt, where t is time). Instantaneous power (P MT ) was calculated as the product of total moment of force (MT) and angular velocity. MT was determined as the sum of the moment due to rotational acceleration of the lower leg (MI) and the moment to overcome gravity (Mgrav) (6). MI was calculated as the moment of inertia (I) times rotational acceleration ( d/dt). I was calculated as the mass of the shank times the square of the gyration radius, with the mass of the shank corresponding to 6.1% of the body mass and the gyration radius estimated as 0.735 times segment length (distance from lateral femoral epicondyle to the malleolus) (62). All parameters were
J Appl Physiol VOL

expressed as average values during the 60 80 range of motion to permit comparison with the isokinetic test results. Furthermore, peak velocity was determined as the greatest slope over successive 2 ms of the goniometer position curve. Electromyography EMG signals were obtained during the isokinetic test and during the maximal unloaded knee extension. After careful preparation of the skin, bipolar surface EMG electrodes (Medicotest M-00-S) were placed on the medial portion of the vastus lateralis (VL), vastus medialis (VM), and rectus femoris (RF) muscles. The exact electrode position was registered and used during all test bouts. The EMG electrodes were connected directly to small preampliers located 10 cm from the recording site. The signals were lead through shielded wires to custom-built differential instrumentation ampliers, with a bandwidth of 10 10,000 Hz and a common mode rejection ratio 100 dB, and sampled at 1,000 Hz (5). During the process of ofine analysis, all raw EMG signals were digitally high-pass ltered at a cutoff frequency of 5 Hz using a fourth-order zero phase lag Butterworth lter (62). The EMG signal was then passed through a symmetric moving root mean square lter with a time constant of 20 ms. The ltered EMG signal was mathematically integrated (iEMG, unit V s) in the 60 80 knee joint angle. To compare between contraction speeds, the iEMG was divided by integration time to yield average EMG in the 60 80 interval. Identical changes in VL, VM, and RF EMG were observed with training, and therefore EMG data were collapsed, i.e., quadriceps EMG (VL VM RF EMG)/3. Normalized EMG. To compare EMG signal amplitudes between contractions at slow, medium, and maximal velocity, EMG were normalized relative to the EMG amplitude measured during maximal concentric contraction at 240/s (5, 53). Antagonist EMG. To quantify the degree of antagonist muscle involvement, EMG signals were synchronously obtained in the biceps femoris caput longus and semitendinosus (5). Muscle CSA Quadriceps anatomical CSA was determined at midfemur (3, 48) from two-dimensional T1-weighted fast eld echo (repetition time/ echo time, 500/14 ms; eld of view 180; matrix 512 512; slice thickness 6 mm) magnetic resonance images (MRI) (Philips, Gyroscan ACS-NT 1.5 T, Best, Holland) at pre- and posttraining and post-detraining. During analysis, CSAs of individual muscles of the thigh were determined by using the computer software of the MRI scanner. CSA of the quadriceps muscle was dened as the sum of CSA of the VL, RF, VM, and vastus intermedius muscles. Financial circumstances precluded obtaining MRI data for the control group. Biopsy Sampling and MHC Analysis Muscle biopsies were obtained from the middle portion of the right VL muscle (15) and immediately mounted with Tissue-Tek, frozen in isopentane cooled with liquid nitrogen, and stored at 80C until processed. Pre- and posttraining and post-detraining biopsies were taken from the same region and depth of the VL muscle. MHC analysis was performed on the biopsies using SDS-PAGE. From each biopsy, 10 20 serial cross sections (20 m) were cut in a cryostat and placed in 100 200 l of lysing buffer and heated for 3 min at 90C (27). Five to 20 l of the myosin-containing samples were loaded on a SDS-PAGE gel containing 6% polyacrylamide and 30% glycerol. Gels were run at 70 V for 42 h at 4C. MHC isoform content was determined with a densiometric system (Cream 1D, KemEnTec Aps, Copenhagen, Denmark) (8). These measurements were not performed for the nontrained control group. Evoked Muscle Twitch Measurements Electrically evoked twitch contractile properties of the VL muscle were determined. The subjects were seated in an upright position with
www.jap.org

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

99 JULY 2005

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

89

the knee exed 90. A steel cuff was strapped around the lower leg, 3 cm above the malleoli, and connected via a rigid steel bar to a strain gauge load cell (Bofors KRG-4, Bofors), which was connected to a preamplier (BK15, Nobel Elektronik) and an amplier (Gould 5900, Gould, Valley View, OH). Surface stimulation electrodes (Bioex, model PE3590) were placed over the distal and proximal muscle belly of the VL. Electrode position was registered as the distance from the proximal border of the patella and used during all test bouts. Twitch contractions were evoked on the passive muscle using electrical stimulation consisting of single square-wave pulses of 0.1-ms duration delivered by a direct current stimulator (Digitimer Electronics, model DS7). Stepwise increments in current were delivered, separated by rest periods of 30 s, until no further increase in twitch amplitude was seen (33), and then three maximal twitches were obtained. The twitch force signal was sampled at 1,000 Hz. During the process of ofine analysis, the signals were digitally low-pass ltered at 25 Hz, by use of a fourth-order zero phase lag Butterworth lter (62). Peak twitch rate of force development was determined as the peak slope in the rising part of the twitch curve derived in successive 2-ms intervals. Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010 Level of Habitual Activity Subjects were interviewed orally about their level of recreational activity at the time of recruitment, after the resistance training period, and again after the period of detraining. Statistical Analysis Repeated-measures ANOVA and subsequent Bonferroni post hoc analysis were used to answer the question whether selected parameters changed over time. Values are reported as means SE unless otherwise stated. The Ciba-Geigy coefcient of variation between testing sessions was calculated for main parameters in the control group (24).

Fig. 2. Resistance training induced muscle hypertrophy in the quadriceps muscle of 10%. After detraining, the muscle atrophied to pretraining levels. CSA, cross-sectional area. *Increase from pre- to posttraining (P 0.001). RESULTS

Training In response to 3 mo of resistance training, isokinetic muscle strength at 30 and 240/s increased 18% (P 0.01) and 10% (P 0.05), respectively (Fig. 1). Anatomical quadriceps CSA increased 10% (P 0.001) (Fig. 2). Agonist EMG at 30/s increased 10%, whereas antagonist EMG remained unchanged (Table 1). The proportion of MHC IIX decreased from 5.6 0.8 to 0.8 0.3% (P 0.001), whereas that of MHC IIA increased from 34.0 2.5 to 39.4 2.0% (P 0.001) (Fig. 3). All other parameters remained unchanged (velocity, acceleration, power Table 1. EMG activity in the training group
Pre Post Post-Detr

Fig. 1. In vivo force-velocity relationship (average moment of force and angular velocity in the 60 80 range of motion for the isokinetic test as well as for the unloaded knee extension). Moment of force was increased at slow-to-medium velocities after resistance training (Post) and decreased to pretraining (Pre) levels after detraining (Post-Detr). However, velocity as well as moment of force during unloaded knee extension was increased after the period of detraining. Values are group means SE. *Posttraining pretraining and postdetraining, P 0.05. #Postdetraining pre-and posttraining, P 0.05. J Appl Physiol VOL

Quad EMG, V 30/s 240/s Unloaded Normalized Quad EMG, % 30/s 240/s Unloaded Antagonist Hams EMG, V 30/s 240/s Unloaded

26720 38340 40958 714 1000 1079 509 598 6514

29319* 36826 35520 814* 1000 965 4612 498 628

25520 37733 35427 714 1000 946 5412 425 6310

Values are means SE; n 14 subjects. Pre, pretraining; Post, posttraining; Post-Detr, post-detraining; Quad, quadriceps; Hams, hamstring. Electromyograph (EMG) activity increased only at the slow contraction after resistance training and decreased to training levels after detraining. Antagonist hamstring EMG activity remained unchanged. *Increase from pre-to posttraining (P 0.05). www.jap.org

99 JULY 2005

90

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

Fig. 4. In vivo power-velocity relationship (average power and velocity in the 60 80 range of motion). Power was increased at slow-to-medium velocities after resistance training. After 3 mo of detraining, power decreased during slow-to-medium velocities but was markedly increased during very high velocity, i.e., maximal unloaded contraction. Values are group means SE. *Posttraining pretraining and postdetraining, P 0.05. #Postdetraining pre- and posttraining, P 0.05. Fig. 3. Myosin heavy chain (MHC) isoform composition. After 3 mo of resistance training, the overall proportion of MHC II (IIA IIX) remained unchanged; however, a subtype transition from MHC IIX to IIA occurred. # P 0.001. **After 3 mo of detraining, MHC IIX increased to levels that were higher compared with pre- (P 0.05) and posttraining (P 0.001). *Furthermore, the overall proportion of MHC II (i.e., IIA IIX) was increased at postdetraining (P 0.05).

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

Control Group In the nontrained control group, all parameters remained unchanged throughout the study period (see Fig. 6 for peak velocity during unloaded knee extension, Fig. 7 for twitch characteristics, and Table 2 for EMG). In the 60 80 range of motion, moment of force at 30/s was 236 13, 232 13, and

and EMG during maximal unloaded knee extension, evoked muscle twitch properties, weight of the lower leg). Detraining After 3 mo of detraining muscle CSA (Fig. 2), isokinetic muscle strength and power at 30 and 240/s (Fig. 1, Fig. 4) and agonist EMG at 30/s (Table 1) decreased to pretraining levels. Angular velocity, acceleration, total moment of force, and power in the 60 80 knee joint interval during maximal unloaded knee extension increased 10% (P 0.05, Fig. 1), 34% (P 0.05, Fig. 5), 31% (P 0.01, Fig. 1), and 44% (P 0.05, Fig. 4), respectively. Peak velocity of maximal unloaded knee extension increased 14% (P 0.05, Fig. 6), and occurred at a more extended knee joint angle after detraining (55 2 vs. 51 1, P 0.05). The time from onset of movement to peak velocity was unchanged from pretraining to posttraining to post-detraining (88 2, 86 3, and 86 2 ms, respectively). Electrically evoked peak twitch rate of force development increased 23% (P 0.001, Fig. 7). MHC IIX increased from 0.8 0.3 to 7.7 1.1%, which was signicantly higher compared with both pre- (P 0.05) and posttraining levels (P 0.001) (Fig. 3). The overall proportion of MHC II (IIA IIX) increased from 40.2 2.1% to 44.7 2.2% (P 0.05) (Fig. 3). Habitual physical activity during the period of detraining remained unchanged compared with that before the training intervention and did not vary from the end of the training period until the end of the follow-up detraining period.
J Appl Physiol VOL

Fig. 5. Angular acceleration during maximal unloaded knee extension (average values in the 60 80 range of motion). After 3 mo of detraining, angular acceleration was markedly increased during unloaded knee extension in the training group (TG) and unchanged in the control group (CG). Values are group means SE. *Postdetraining pre- and posttraining, P 0.05. www.jap.org

99 JULY 2005

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

91

Table 2. EMG activity in the control group

Pre Post Post-Detr

Quad EMG, V 30/s 240/s Unloaded Normalized Quad EMG, % 30/s 240/s Unloaded Antagonist Hams EMG, V 30/s 240/s Unloaded

22325 39042 41461 625 1000 1066 495 627 5013

23540 39157 41269 614 1000 1056 454 7014 4712

25444 40852 44596 645 1000 1098 464 608 5817

Values are means SE; n 10 subjects. No change occurred in the control group. DISCUSSION

Fig. 6. Peak velocity of voluntary maximal unloaded knee extension. Resistance training failed to enhance maximal unloaded movement speed. However, after 3 mo of detraining, peak velocity was increased 14% in the training group, whereas no change occurred in the control group. *P 0.05.

The main and novel ndings of the present study were that, after 3 mo of detraining, maximal unloaded knee extension velocity and power increased. This was seen along with faster muscle twitch contractile properties and increased proportion of fast muscle MHC. Effects of Resistance Training It is well known that resistance training induces muscle hypertrophy (3, 29, 49), gains in isokinetic muscle strength (5, 7, 19, 49), and increased agonist EMG activity (5, 13, 46). The results of the present study are in accordance with these ndings. The most pronounced strength gains occurred at the slow contraction velocity (30/s), whereas the increase was less pronounced at medium velocity (240/s) and performance was unchanged during maximal unloaded contraction (velocity 700 900/s). Furthermore, EMG increased only at the slow velocity. The velocity of the resistance training exercises ranged between 30 and 90/s, i.e., lifting the weight stack in 13 s through a 90 range of motion. Thus the present results support the concept of velocity-specic neural training adaptations (22, 38, 45, 50), although this concept has not been supported by all previous studies (6, 12, 44). The present results could also reect a training-induced neural disinhibition of inhibitory mechanisms that normally may limit maximal muscle force exertion in untrained subjects (5). Thus, whereas muscle hypertrophy probably enhanced muscle strength at slow and medium contraction velocities, the present results indicate that neural adaptations further enhanced slow muscle strength. The potential nature of the neural adaptation mechaTable 3. Coefcient of variation of major parameters from pre- to posttraining and from posttraining to post-detraining in the nontrained control group
Unloaded Knee Extension, % CV MT Power Isokinetic, % 30/s 240/s Twitch tRFD, %

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

224 13 N m at pretraining, posttraining, and post-detraining, respectively. Moment of force at 240/s was 145 6, 148 3, and 141 7 N m. Coefcient of variation of selected parameters ranged from 3.3 to 11.6% between testing sessions (Table 3).

12 23 Fig. 7. Electrically evoked twitch characteristics. After 3 mo of detraining, the peak twitch rate of force development was increased 23% in the training group, whereas no change occurred in the control group. RFD, rate of force development. *P 0.001. J Appl Physiol VOL

3.6 4.1

7.4 10.6

6.7 9.1

9.8 11.6

5.4 5.5

3.3 3.6

8.9 10.9

CV, coefcient of variation; 12, pre- to posttraining; 23, posttraining to post-detraining; (n 10 subjects). , Knee extension angular velocity; , rotational acceleration; MT, total moment of force; tRFD, twitch rate of force development. www.jap.org

99 JULY 2005

92

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

nisms has been discussed in detail elsewhere (1, 13, 25, 40). Finally, it should be noted that measurements of surface EMG should be interpreted with caution (26). Increased EMG amplitude in response to training is commonly believed to reect increased recruitment and ring rate of motor units (56), which in turn would increase force output of the muscle. However, increased EMG could also reect increased synchronization of motor units (23, 63), which may not, per se, increase muscle force. In addition, a training-induced change in muscle architecture via an increased muscle ber pennation angle could have contributed to the present strength gains (3, 39). Performance of maximal unloaded knee extension remained unchanged in response to the present resistance training protocol that involved 6 12 RM loads and a total of 1215 sets for the quadriceps muscle per training session, which was designed to induce muscle hypertrophy (57). Although the training-induced increase in muscle strength and size per se may have augmented contractile impulse and thus velocity during unloaded knee extension, this benet may have been counteracted by the almost complete removal of MHC IIX (Fig. 3). Perhaps other types of training, e.g., power training (30, 32, 40), intended ballistic contractions (12), and resistance training involving very heavy loads (1 8 RM) (6, 51, 52) may be effective to improve muscle force generation at very high contraction velocities through increased neural drive and/or selective hypertrophy of type II muscle bers. Effects of Detraining After 3 mo of detraining, the training-induced strength gains at 30 and 240/s returned to pretraining levels along with muscular atrophy (Fig. 2) and decreased EMG at the slow velocity (Table 1). These results are in line with previous studies (8, 29, 35, 49). However, most importantly, maximal

healthy subjects exposed to bed rest (9). However, in the present study, the subjects resumed their previous activity level during the period of detraining. Together this indicates that a marked decrease in the level of activity induces a shift toward a faster MHC isoform expression (I 3 IIA 3 IIX). It has been proposed that human skeletal muscle MHC IIX represents a default gene setting that is expressed in the absence of muscle contractile activity (9, 11, 28). The present results extend this hypothesis and suggest that the relative decrease in activity triggers this response. In support of this and in line with previous ndings (8), withdrawal of resistance training stimulus for 3 mo triggered a shift toward faster MHC phenotypes (I 3 IIA 3 IIX) (Fig. 3). Physical training as well as decreased activity per se do not appear to affect contractile characteristics of individual MHC isoforms (61), although individual muscle bers can change the MHC isoform expressed (8, 10, 28). Thus, regardless of the level of conditioning, type IIX muscle bers contract approximately twice as fast as type IIA and 9- to 10-fold faster than type I muscle bers, whereas hybrid bers display intermediate contractile properties (16, 17, 43). Likewise, intermediate contractile properties of whole muscle in vivo with a mixed muscle ber-type composition are observed compared with either a type I or type II dominated muscle (33). At rsthand, the change in MHC isoform composition from the trained state to the detrained state appears small (Fig. 3) compared with the change in unloaded limb movement speed (Figs. 1 and 6). However, a rough estimate based on a 1-4-9 relationship in maximal contraction velocity between MHC type I-IIA-IIX (16, 17, 43) indicates that the present change in MHC composition from posttraining to post-detraining could theoretically induce a relative increase of 21% in maximal unloaded contraction velocity, which corresponds well to the observed 14%:

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

%MHC I 1detrained %MHC IIA 4detrained %MHC IIX 9detrained 55.3% 1 37.1% 4 7.7% 9 1.21 %MHC I 1trained %MHC IIA 4trained %MHC IIX 9trained 59.8% 1 39.4% 4 0.8% 9 unloaded movement speed and power increased after the period of detraining (Fig. 1, Fig. 4) concurrently with an increase in the proportion of fast MHC (Fig. 3). Agonist and antagonist EMG activity during the maximal unloaded limb movement remained unchanged throughout the study, indicating that peripheral adaptations alone were responsible for the observed increase in maximal unloaded limb movement speed. A higher electrically evoked twitch rate of force development was seen with detraining (Fig. 7), which suggests that muscle excitation-contraction coupling and/or cross-bridge cycling rate was enhanced. A similar nding has been reported for human calf muscle after 8 wk of detraining (37). Causative factors could be related to altered sarcoplasmic reticulum Ca2 kinetics (18, 42) and MHC isoform composition (33). In line with previous ndings (8), detraining increased the levels of MHC IIX compared with those seen before resistance training. Furthermore, the present study suggests that the overall proportion of fast MHC II (IIA IIX) may increase at the expense of decreased MHC I content with detraining. Such a MHC transition has also been observed in
J Appl Physiol VOL

It should be noted that this calculation is based on maximal contraction velocities of single bers (16, 17, 43) and should therefore be taken with caution, because function of whole muscles in vivo is more complex than that of single bers in vitro. Nevertheless, a phenotypic transition toward faster MHC isoforms in response to detraining could theoretically explain the present nding of faster unloaded limb movement speed. In line with the present ndings, it has previously been found that muscle ber-type composition becomes increasingly more related to contractile performance as the velocity of movement increases (2, 21, 58), although not clearly supported by all studies (36). Tihanyi et al. (60) demonstrated that, when velocity of shortening exceeds half of maximal, ber-typerelated differences may become discernible for contractile quadriceps strength in vivo. Likewise, Thorstensson et al. (58) found a signicant correlation between the percentage of type II muscle bers and maximal knee extension velocity. The present results support that adaptations of the muscle at the molecular level play a prominent role during high-velocity movements with negligible external resistance. Thus it is likely
www.jap.org

99 JULY 2005

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE

93

that increased velocity and power of maximal unloaded limb movement occurred mainly as a result of the observed MHC transition toward faster isoforms. It cannot be ruled out, however, that other factors could also have contributed to the present ndings, e.g., enhanced SR Ca2 kinetics or excitationcontraction coupling. Muscle power output is an important functional parameter as it is the product of muscle force and contraction velocity (i.e., P MT ) . Power during unloaded knee extension was markedly increased after detraining (Fig. 4). Increased rotational acceleration of the lower leg (Fig. 5) affects both velocity (i.e., d dt) and moment of force (i.e., MI I), which together affect power. During unloaded knee extension, peak velocity is achieved in less than 90 ms. In contrast, longer time is needed to reach maximum muscular force (300 ms, e.g., Ref. 59). Thus during unloaded limb movement, a high contractile rate of force development (4) is of vital importance to achieve a high acceleration and thus power and velocity. The greater cross-bridge cycling rate of type IIA and type IIX muscle bers compared with type I muscle bers (17) allows for a faster rate of force development and thus enhanced acceleration of the lower limb. In support of this, Houston and coworkers (36) found that angular acceleration of maximal unloaded knee extension was signicantly correlated to muscle ber-type composition. Thus the marked increase in power likely reects an increased rate of force development, which in turn allows for a greater acceleration of the lower limb. Other studies have reported decreased level of power in response to detraining (41, 47). The discrepancy between the present and previous results may be related to the method of measuring power. In the present study, power development was measured during conditions of no external resistance. However, in the previous studies, movement of the leg was performed against external resistance. Power development against external resistance has been shown to be moderately to strongly correlated to maximal muscle strength (14, 55). Thus these previous reports of decreased power in response to detraining (41, 47) may be associated with decreased maximal muscle strength. Furthermore, it is unknown whether an overshoot of fast muscle MHC occurred in response to detraining in these previous studies. In agreement with these previous ndings, power was observed to decrease in the present study at medium and slow isokinetic muscle contraction where a high moment of force was present (Fig. 4). Thus, when muscle contraction is performed against substantial external load, power production is highly inuenced by muscle mass and maximal contraction strength (55). In contrast, when maximal velocity unloaded movements are performed intrinsic muscle contractile properties appear to dominate. Implications for Performance Some care should be taken when interpreting the functional relevance of the present results for athletic performance. Highly trained athletes have shown preferential atrophy of type II muscle bers with 2 wk of detraining (34), which would reduce the relative proportion of type II MHC. Thus the present ndings may not extend to highly trained athletes because of differences in initial muscle ber size and level of conditioning. It should also be mentioned that muscles do not always function at maximal angular velocities and in unloaded fashJ Appl Physiol VOL

ion. Thus it can be speculated that the present results may only relate to high-velocity unloaded movements, e.g., punching, kicking, or smashing, but not to loaded movements like sprint running (load of body weight), jumping, and shot putting. Consequently, further investigations should be conducted in trained athletes involved in sports with high-velocity unloaded movements. In conclusion, the present study demonstrated that detraining from resistance training increases velocity and power of maximal unloaded limb movement in previously untrained subjects. This was seen along with increased expression of faster muscle MHC isoforms (I 3 IIA 3 IIX) paralleled by faster intrinsic contractile properties.
ACKNOWLEDGMENTS Thanks go to Hanne Overgaard for technical assistance. GRANTS This study was supported by the Danish Elite Sport Association (Team Danmark). REFERENCES 1. Aagaard P. Training-induced changes in neural function. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 31: 61 67, 2003. 2. Aagaard P and Andersen JL. Correlation between contractile strength and myosin heavy chain isoform composition in human skeletal muscle. Med Sci Sports Exerc 30: 12171222, 1998. 3. Aagaard P, Andersen JL, Dyhre-Poulsen P, Leffers AM, Wagner A, Magnusson SP, Halkjaer-Kristensen J, and Simonsen EB. A mechanism for increased contractile strength of human pennate muscle in response to strength training: changes in muscle architecture. J Physiol 534: 613 623, 2001. 4. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson P, and DyhrePoulsen P. Increased rate of force development and neural drive of human skeletal muscle following resistance training. J Appl Physiol 93: 1318 1326, 2002. 5. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Andersen JL, Magnusson SP, HalkjaerKristensen J, and Dyhre-Poulsen P. Neural inhibition during maximal eccentric and concentric quadriceps contraction: effects of resistance training. J Appl Physiol 89: 2249 2257, 2000. 6. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Trolle M, Bangsbo J, and Klausen K. Effects of different strength training regimes on moment and power generation during dynamic knee extensions. Eur J Appl Physiol 69: 382386, 1994. 7. Aagaard P, Simonsen EB, Trolle M, Bangsbo J, and Klausen K. Specicity of training velocity and training load on gains in isokinetic knee joint strength. Acta Physiol Scand 156: 123129, 1996. 8. Andersen JL and Aagaard P. Myosin heavy chain IIX overshoot in human skeletal muscle. Muscle Nerve 23: 10951104, 2000. 9. Andersen JL, Gruschy-Knudsen T, Sandri C, Larsson L, and Schiafno S. Bed rest increases the amount of mismatched bers in human skeletal muscle. J Appl Physiol 86: 455 460, 1999. 10. Andersen JL, Klitgaard H, and Saltin B. Myosin heavy chain isoforms in single bres from m. vastus lateralis of sprinters: inuence of training. Acta Physiol Scand 151: 135142, 1994. 11. Andersen JL, Mohr T, Biering-Sorensen F, Galbo H, and Kjaer M. Myosin heavy chain isoform transformation in single bres from m. vastus lateralis in spinal cord injured individuals: effects of long-term functional electrical stimulation (FES). Pu gers Arch 431: 513518, 1996. 12. Behm DG and Sale DG. Intended rather than actual movement velocity determines velocity-specic training response. J Appl Physiol 74: 359 368, 1993. 13. Behm D. Neuromuscular implications and applications of resistance training. J Strength Cond Res 9: 264 274, 1995. 14. Bell GJ, Petersen SR, Quinney HA, and Wenger HA. The effect of velocity-specic strength training on peak torque and anaerobic rowing power. J Sports Sci 7: 205214, 1989. 15. Bergstro m J. Muscle electrolytes in man. Scand J Clin Lab Invest 68, Suppl: 1110, 1962. www.jap.org

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

99 JULY 2005

94

DETRAINING INDUCES FASTER MUSCLE PHENOTYPE 40. Kraemer WJ, Fleck SJ, and Evans WJ. Strength and power training: physiological mechanisms of adaptation. Exerc Sport Sci Rev 24: 363 397, 1996. 41. Kraemer WJ, Koziris LP, Ratamess NA, Hakkinen K, TripletMcBride NT, Fry AC, Gordon SE, Volek JS, French DN, Rubin MR, Gomez AL, Sharman MJ, Michael LJ, Izquierdo M, Newton RU, and Fleck SJ. Detraining produces minimal changes in physical performance and hormonal variables in recreationally strength-trained men. J Strength Cond Res 16: 373382, 2002. 42. Kugelberg E and Thornell LE. Contraction time, histochemical type, and terminal cisternae volume of rat motor units. Muscle Nerve 6: 149 153, 1983. 43. Larsson L and Moss RL. Maximum velocity of shortening in relation to myosin isoform composition in single bres from human skeletal muscles. J Physiol 472: 595 614, 1993. 44. Lesmes GR, Costill DL, Coyle EF, and Fink WJ. Muscle strength and power changes during maximal isokinetic training. Med Sci Sports 10: 266 269, 1978. 45. Moffroid MT and Whipple RH. Specicity of speed of exercise. Phys Ther 50: 16921700, 1970. 46. Moritani T. Neuromuscular adaptations during the acquisition of muscle strength, power and motor tasks. J Biomech 26, Suppl 1: 95107, 1993. 47. Mujika I and Padilla S. Muscular characteristics of detraining in humans. Med Sci Sports Exerc 33: 12971303, 2001. 48. Narici MV, Hoppeler H, Kayser B, Landoni L, Claassen H, Gavardi C, Conti M, and Cerretelli P. Human quadriceps cross-sectional area, torque and neural activation during 6 mo strength training. Acta Physiol Scand 157: 175186, 1996. 49. Narici MV, Roi GS, Landoni L, Minetti AE, and Cerretelli P. Changes in force, cross-sectional area and neural activation during strength training and detraining of the human quadriceps. Eur J Appl Physiol 59: 310 319, 1989. 50. Paddon-Jones D, Leveritt M, Lonergan A, and Abernethy P. Adaptation to chronic eccentric exercise in humans: the inuence of contraction velocity. Eur J Appl Physiol 85: 466 471, 2001. 51. Schmidtbleicher D and Buehrle M. Neuronal adaptations and increase of cross-sectional area studying different strength training methods. Biomech X B: 615 620, 1987. 52. Schmidtbleicher D and Haralambie G. Changes in contractile properties of muscle after strength training in man. Eur J Appl Physiol 46: 221228, 1981. 53. Seger JY and Thorstensson A. Muscle strength and myoelectric activity in prepubertal and adult males and females. Eur J Appl Physiol 69: 81 87, 1994. 54. Staron RS, Leonardi MJ, Karapondo DL, Malicky ES, Falkel JE, Hagerman FC, and Hikida RS. Strength and skeletal muscle adaptations in heavy-resistance-trained women after detraining and retraining. J Appl Physiol 70: 631 640, 1991. 55. Stone MH, Sanborn K, OBryant HS, Hartman M, Stone ME, Proulx C, Ward B, and Hruby J. Maximum strength-power-performance relationships in collegiate throwers. J Strength Cond Res 17: 739 745, 2003. 56. Suzuki H, Conwit RA, Stashuk D, Santarsiero L, and Metter EJ. Relationships between surface-detected EMG signals and motor unit activation. Med Sci Sports Exerc 34: 1509 1517, 2002. 57. Tesch PA. Training for bodybuilding. In: Strength and Power in Sport, edited by Komi PV. London: Blackwell Science, 1992, p. 370 380. 58. Thorstensson A, Grimby G, and Karlsson J. Force-velocity relations and ber composition in human knee extensor muscles. J Appl Physiol 40: 1216, 1976. 59. Thorstensson A, Karlsson J, Viitasalo JH, Luhtanen P, and Komi PV. Effect of strength training on EMG of human skeletal muscle. Acta Physiol Scand 98: 232236, 1976. 60. Tihanyi J, Apor P, and Fekete G. Force-velocity-power characteristics and ber composition in human knee extensor muscles. Eur J Appl Physiol 48: 331343, 1982. 61. Widrick JJ, Stelzer JE, Shoepe TC, and Garner DP. Functional properties of human muscle bers after short-term resistance exercise training. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol 283: R408 R416, 2002. 62. Winter DA. Biomechanics and Motor Control of Human Movement. New York: Wiley, 1990, p. 1150. 63. Yao W, Fuglevand RJ, and Enoka RM. Motor-unit synchronization increases EMG amplitude and decreases force steadiness of simulated contractions. J Neurophysiol 83: 441 452, 2000. www.jap.org

16. Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, and Reggiani C. Forcevelocity properties of human skeletal muscle bres: myosin heavy chain isoform and temperature dependence. J Physiol 495: 573586, 1996. 17. Bottinelli R, Pellegrino MA, Canepari M, Rossi R, and Reggiani C. Specic contributions of various muscle bre types to human muscle performance: an in vitro study. J Electromyogr Kinesiol 9: 8795, 1999. 18. Brody IA. Regulation of isometric contraction in skeletal muscle. Exp Neurol 50: 673 683, 1976. 19. Caiozzo VJ, Perrine JJ, and Edgerton VR. Training-induced alterations of the in vivo force-velocity relationship of human muscle. J Appl Physiol 51: 750 754, 1981. 20. Colliander EB and Tesch PA. Effects of detraining following short term resistance training on eccentric and concentric muscle strength. Acta Physiol Scand 144: 2329, 1992. 21. Coyle EF, Costill DL, and Lesmes GR. Leg extension power and muscle ber composition. Med Sci Sports 11: 1215, 1979. 22. Coyle EF, Feiring DC, Rotkis TC, Cote RW III, Roby FB, Lee W, and Wilmore JH. Specicity of power improvements through slow and fast isokinetic training. J Appl Physiol 51: 14371442, 1981. 23. Day SJ and Hulliger M. Experimental simulation of cat electromyogram: evidence for algebraic summation of motor-unit action-potential trains. J Neurophysiol 86: 2144 2158, 2001. 24. Diem K and Seldrup J. Geigy Scientic Tables. Introduction to Statistics. Statistical Tables. Mathematical Formulae. Basel, Switzerland: CibaGeigy, 1982, vol. 2, p. 195. 25. Duchateau J and Enoka RM. Neural adaptations with chronic activity patterns in able-bodied humans. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 81: S17S27, 2002. 26. Farina D, Merletti R, and Enoka RM. The extraction of neural strategies from the surface EMG. J Appl Physiol 96: 1486 1495, 2004. 27. Fry AC, Allemeier CA, and Staron RS. Correlation between percentage ber type area and myosin heavy chain content in human skeletal muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 68: 246 251, 1994. 28. Goldspink G, Scutt A, Martindale J, Jaenicke T, Turay L, and Gerlach GF. Stretch and force generation induce rapid hypertrophy and myosin isoform gene switching in adult skeletal muscle. Biochem Soc Trans 19: 368 373, 1991. 29. Hakkinen K, Alen M, and Komi PV. Changes in isometric force- and relaxation-time, electromyographic and muscle bre characteristics of human skeletal muscle during strength training and detraining. Acta Physiol Scand 125: 573585, 1985. 30. Hakkinen K, Kallinen M, Izquierdo M, Jokelainen K, Lassila H, Malkia E, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, and Alen M. Changes in agonistantagonist EMG, muscle CSA, and force during strength training in middle-aged and older people. J Appl Physiol 84: 13411349, 1998. 31. Hakkinen K and Komi PV. Electromyographic changes during strength training and detraining. Med Sci Sports Exerc 15: 455 460, 1983. 32. Hakkinen K, Kraemer WJ, Newton RU, and Alen M. Changes in electromyographic activity, muscle bre and force production characteristics during heavy resistance/power strength training in middle-aged and older men and women. Acta Physiol Scand 171: 51 62, 2001. 33. Harridge SD, Bottinelli R, Canepari M, Pellegrino MA, Reggiani C, Esbjornsson M, and Saltin B. Whole-muscle and single-bre contractile properties and myosin heavy chain isoforms in humans. Pu gers Arch 432: 913920, 1996. 34. Hortobagyi T, Houmard JA, Stevenson JR, Fraser DD, Johns RA, and Israel RG. The effects of detraining on power athletes. Med Sci Sports Exerc 25: 929 935, 1993. 35. Houston ME, Froese EA, Valeriote SP, Green HJ, and Ranney DA. Muscle performance, morphology and metabolic capacity during strength training and detraining: a one leg model. Eur J Appl Physiol 51: 2535, 1983. 36. Houston ME, Norman RW, and Froese EA. Mechanical measures during maximal velocity knee extension exercise and their relation to bre composition of the human vastus lateralis muscle. Eur J Appl Physiol 58: 17, 1988. 37. Ishida K, Moritani T, and Itoh K. Changes in voluntary and electrically induced contractions during strength training and detraining. Eur J Appl Physiol 60: 244 248, 1990. 38. Kanehisa H and Miyashita M. Specicity of velocity in strength training. Eur J Appl Physiol 52: 104 106, 1983. 39. Kawakami Y, Abe T, and Fukunaga T. Muscle-ber pennation angles are greater in hypertrophied than in normal muscles. J Appl Physiol 74: 2740 2744, 1993. J Appl Physiol VOL

Downloaded from jap.physiology.org on August 27, 2010

99 JULY 2005