Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 1

March 28th, 2014 Mr.

Nolan, We realize that because we are being represented, you cannot comment on the matter direct rom me but eel we need to again try to clari y our position. 2! "his section does not re#uire an internet drop$o store complying with subsection %&!, or a person

engaged in the sale, purchase, consignment, or trade of personal property or other valuable thing for himself or herself, to obtain a license under this act.
%"his sections within the act clearly and speci ically de ines our businesses whereby all the merchandise within our stores is indi'idually owned by persons selling their items directly rom their hands to the customer. "here ore ma(ing our in'entory e)empt.! *espite the complete disregard to the consignment portion o the statute, and instead ocus on the portion o the law you are trying to it,

(f) "Second hand dealer" or "junk dealer" means any person, corporation, or member or members of a copartnership or firm whose principal business is that of purchasing, selling, exchanging, storing, or receiving
second hand articles o any (ind... you will notice that second hand is written as two words, not one. + the word was meant to describe the articles within our store it would be written as an ad,ecti'e $ one word %secondhand!. -ince it is purposely written as two words %a noun! you should then be able to reread the statute with the new mindset that it is pertaining to a transaction $ our .hand. recei'ing goods $ as i the in'entory in our store is being purchased within the place o business and now belongs to us $ there ore needing to be logged/reported. "he trans er o ownership o the merchandise is what this statute is pertaining to not the type o merchandise being sold. No where in this statute is it describing the type o merchandise + am selling in an attempt to gain compliance or merely ,ust storing. .0sed. merchandise is ne'er spo(en o . "here ore, this statute doesn1t it any business who simply has used merchandise unless they ha'e obtained merchandise through purchasing direct rom an indi'idual at their place o business. +t is my understanding that compliance within this statute that would determine whether + was operating illegally or not is based on the logging and reporting o transactions. 2'erything else under the statute are merely bylines and ha'e no bearing on whether we are doing something against the law. + we ne'er purchase and there ore ha'e nothing to log or report, then what is the reasoning behind ha'ing to obtain the license3 4ll licenses gi'e permission to do something. "his license gi'es permission to .buy.. We do not buy and are not as(ing to buy. + we choose to change our business model, then yes $ obtain the license. 5ou can1t orce a license on someone who doesn1t want to utilize it. +t is our hope and sincerest intentions to recti y this be ore close o business day today. 4lthough you can1t respond, *ale and *onna most certainly can. -incerely, 6achel 7enson

Вам также может понравиться