Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Economics Group
Special Commentary
Jay Bryson, Global Economist
jay.bryson@wachovia.com ● 704-383-3518
Anika R. Khan, Economist
anika.khan@wachovia.com ● 704-715-0575
Yasmine Kamaruddin, Economic Analyst
yasmine.kamaruddin@wachovia.com ● 704-374-2992
1 The TIPS spread is the difference between the yield on a Treasury security and the yield on the Treasury Inflation-
Protected Security of comparable maturity. Therefore, the spread measures the difference between a nominal yield and a
real yield, and can thus be interpreted as a measure on inflation expectations.
has at present. Over the past 12 months the price of gold has risen about 50 percent, a sizeable
increase but well short of the near trebling in price that occurred between January 1979 and
January 1980. In real terms, the price of gold is about 50 percent below the peak that it reached
in January 1980 (Figure 2). Therefore, the inflationary signal that today’s increase in gold prices
may be sending does not appear to be as strident as the warning sent three decades ago.
Figure 1 Figure 2
CPI vs. Lagged Gold Prices Real vs. Nominal Price of Gold
Year-over-Year Percent Change, Dollar per Ounce Index, January 1980 = 100
25% $1,200 120 $1,200
CPI, Year-over-Year Percent Change: Sep @ -1.3% Real Gold Prices: Sep @ 56 (Left Axis)
Gold Spot Price, 1-Year Lag: Oct @ $1,066.02 per Ounce 110 Gold Spot Price: Oct @ $1,066.02 per Ounce (Right Axis) $1,100
90 $900
70 $700
50 $500
5% $400 40 $400
30 $300
0% $200 20 $200
10 $100
-5% $0 0 $0
1971 1975 1979 1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003 2007 1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006
Source: U.S. Department of Labor, Bloomberg LP and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
If inflation is a Moreover, we are not convinced that the current run-up in the price of gold is indeed associated
concern, then why with concerns about rising inflation, because other early-warning signals of inflation are
are Treasury yields quiescent at present. Consider Treasury bond yields. The high inflation rates of the early 1980s
so low? and expectations that inflation would remain elevated led to double-digit yields on 10-year U.S.
Treasury securities (Figure 3). Today, however, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury security is
comfortably below 4 percent. Would investors really be concerned about runaway inflation if they
are willing to lend money to the U.S. Treasury for 10 years at less than 4 percent per annum?
Moreover, the yield spread between the nominal 10-year bond and the inflation-protected 10 year
bond, the so-called TIPS spread, is less than 2 percent at present.
The Fed announced in March 2009 that it would buy $300 billion worth of Treasury securities to
help hold down long-term interest rates. Couldn’t the Fed’s extraordinary purchase program
artificially reduce Treasury yields and render them useless as an inflation signal? In the absence
of the Fed’s purchases, wouldn’t Treasury yields be higher and investor concerns about inflation
be more visible?
Maybe, but the Fed is near the end of its purchase program. It seems that Treasury yields would
have already reacted to the well-publicized news that the Fed plans to wrap up its program by the
end of October 2009. Moreover, the Fed’s total purchases represent only 4 percent of the
$7 trillion worth of marketable Treasury securities outstanding. It does not seem likely that the
Fed’s actions would be able to hold down yields if investors really feared an inflationary outbreak.
Consumers’ Moreover, other inflation indicators are not flashing red at present. There is a question in the
inflation University of Michigan’s survey of consumer attitudes that measures inflation expectations over
expectations the next five years. This measure of inflation expectation rose to nearly 10 percent in the early
remain well 1980s, but it has remained remarkably steady over the past decade or so suggesting that
contained. consumers do not seem to be too worried about inflation at present (Figure 4). Therefore, the
hypothesis that the sharp increase in gold prices recently foretells an episode of rapidly rising
inflation does not appear to be supported by other measures of inflation expectations.
Another plausible idea is that the rise in gold prices is due to an increase in risk aversion. In the
past, investors have flocked to the safety of gold when they have become spooked. If risk aversion
were rising, however, then why have the prices of equities, whose uncertain cash flow
2
What Is Gold Telling Us? WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC
October 20, 2009 ECONOMICS GROUP
characteristics make them among the riskiest of financial assets, increased so much recently? 2
The fall in the VIX index, which measures stock market volatility, and the narrowing of credit
spreads also indicate that risk aversion is declining, not increasing.
Figure 3 Figure 4
10-Year Treasury Yield vs. TIPS Spread Inflation Expectations in Five Years
Percent University of Michigan
20% 20% 10% 10%
US 10-Year Government Bond: Sep @ 3.31%
18% TIPS Spread: Sep @ 1.77% 18% 9% 9%
12% 12% 6% 6%
10% 10% 5% 5%
8% 8% 4% 4%
6% 6% 3% 3%
4% 4% 2% 2%
2% 2% 1% 1%
Inflation Expectations in 5 Years: Oct @ 2.9%
0% 0% 0% 0%
1970 1974 1978 1982 1986 1990 1994 1998 2002 2006 1980 1983 1986 1989 1992 1995 1998 2001 2004 2007
Source: Federal Reserve Board, University of Michigan and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Some Central Banks Are Switching into Gold
If expectations of rising inflation and increasing risk aversion do not appear to be good Central banks
explanations for the recent run-up in the price of gold, then what explains its increase? We purchased a record
believe that central banks may be part of the story. The price of gold fell to roughly $900/ounce amount of gold in
in early July, but it has risen essentially non-stop in subsequent weeks. Interestingly, gold July.
purchases by central banks increased by a record amount in July (Figure 5). Although “hard” data
for central bank holdings of gold in August, September and the first few weeks of October are not
yet readily available, anecdotal evidence suggests that central banks have continued to purchase
gold. For example, a recent Wall Street Journal article noted that the Taiwanese central bank will
likely increase the amount of gold in its foreign-exchange reserves. 3
Why would central banks have an interest in buying gold? Central banks have increased their Foreign central
foreign exchange holding from about $2 trillion at the beginning of the decade to roughly banks appear to be
$7 trillion at present, and the U.S. dollar comprises about two-thirds of that total. How many diversifying away
more dollar assets do foreign central banks need? Although foreign central banks continue to buy from the dollar on
U.S. Treasury securities—they purchased $53 billion in the 12 months through August 2009—the a flow basis.
pace of purchases has slowed over the past year or so. Foreign central banks are not dumping
U.S. assets, but they appear to be diversifying their purchases on a flow basis. Although central
bank holdings of gold have trended lower for the past two decades, foreign central banks may be
buying gold again as a way to diversify their portfolios and their purchases appear to be
contributing to the increase in the price of the precious metal.
Speculators May Be Piling On
It also appears that speculators have thrown their hat in the ring and are helping to push gold
prices up even higher. One measure of speculative activity is the number of futures contracts
outstanding, so-called “open interest”, on the COMEX exchange. Future contracts allow investors
to realize financial gains through price changes without taking physical possession of a
commodity. The price of gold and the amount of open interest have been trending higher over the
past few years (Figure 6). Since early September open interest has increased by 165,000
contracts, the largest six-week rise in about 10 years. Although commercial accounts (i.e., end
users of gold) may be increasing the number of future contracts they buy to hedge against further
2The S&P 500 index is up more than 60 percent relative to its bottom in March 2009.
3Perris Lee Choon Siong, “Taiwan Ctrl Bank Gov: Can Study Increasing Gold in FX Reserves”, the Wall Street Journal,
Oct. 13, 2009
3
What Is Gold Telling Us? WELLS FARGO SECURITIES, LLC
October 20, 2009 ECONOMICS GROUP
large price increases, we suspect that non-commercial accounts (i.e., speculators) are also behind
the recent increases in open interest and the price of gold.
Figure 5 Figure 6
Official Holdings of Gold Gold: Total Open Interest Contracts vs. Spot Price
In Millions of Troy Ounces In Thousand, Dollars per Ounce
1,200 1,200 700 $1,100
$1,000
600
1,150 1,150 $900
500 $800
1,100 1,100
$700
400
$600
1,050 1,050
$500
300
$400
1,000 1,000
200 $300
Source: Bloomberg LP, International Monetary Fund and Wells Fargo Securities, LLC
Conclusions
Some observers have interpreted the record rise in the price of gold recently as a warning that the
United States is on the cusp of another inflationary period à la the late 1970s/early 1980s.
Unprecedented amounts of liquidity that the Federal Reserve has pumped into the banking
system and record budget deficits of the federal government also seem to support the notion that
years of crippling inflation may be just around the corner. However, other early warning
indicators of inflation, such as yields on U.S. Treasury securities and measures of consumer
inflation expectations, do not support the hypothesis that investors are universally concerned
about a period of runaway inflation.
Rather, the recent rise in the price of gold appears to be related, at least in part, to attempts by
foreign central banks to diversify their reserve holdings on a flow basis. After years of reducing
their holdings of gold, foreign central banks bought a record amount of the precious metal in July
and anecdotal evidence suggests that their net purchases have continued over the past few
months. Speculators appear to be jumping on the pile as well, which also may be helping to push
up gold prices. Although it is impossible to determine how much central banks wish to increase
their holdings of gold, the big decline in their gold portfolios that has occurred over the past two
decades suggests that they have scope to continue buying gold for some time.
Foreign central Interest by foreign central banks to increase their gold holdings begs a more fundamental
banks have not question. Have they lost confidence in the dollar? Probably not, at least not yet. As noted above,
“lost confidence” in foreign central banks have purchased $53 billion worth of Treasury securities over the past 12
the dollar, at least months. Although the pace of purchases has slowed from its rate of a year or so ago, we think
not yet. foreign central banks would have become outright net sellers of Treasury securities if they had
“lost confidence” in the greenback. Foreign central banks are not dumping dollars, but they
appear to be diversifying away from the greenback on a flow basis.
As we argue in a recent report, however, indications that the United States is not serious about
addressing its long-run fiscal challenges could eventually lead foreign investors and central banks
to reassess their willingness to continue financing U.S. government obligations. 4 Although there
is little evidence to date to suggest that that point has been reached, the price of gold could
skyrocket if foreign governments do indeed lose confidence in the dollar.
4 See “What’s Wrong With the Dollar?” (September 24, 2009), which is posted at www.wachovia.com/economics.
4
Wells Fargo Securities, LLC Economics Group
Wells Fargo Securities Economics Group publications are produced by Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, a U.S broker-dealer
registered with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, and the
Securities Investor Protection Corp. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, distributes these publications directly and through
subsidiaries including, but not limited to, Wells Fargo & Company, Wachovia Bank N.A., Wells Fargo Bank N.A,
Wells Fargo Advisors, LLC, and Wells Fargo Securities International Limited. The information and opinions herein are
for general information use only. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC does not guarantee their accuracy or completeness, nor
does Wells Fargo Securities, LLC assume any liability for any loss that may result from the reliance by any person upon
any such information or opinions. Such information and opinions are subject to change without notice, are for general
information only and are not intended as an offer or solicitation with respect to the purchase or sales of any security or
as personalized investment advice. Wells Fargo Securities, LLC is a separate legal entity and distinct from affiliated
banks and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Wells Fargo & Company © 2009 Wells Fargo Securities, LLC.