Camacho- Reyes v. Ramon Reyes, G.R. No. 185286, August 18, 2010 FACTS: A and B got married.

Their marriage was rocky because B did not support his wife, nor did he take good care of his children. B entered into a lot of business entures but all were unsuccessful adding to the problems in their marriage. A sought to ha e the marriage annulled on the ground of psychological incapacity !Article "#$. %TC &ruled that there is 'sychological (ncapacity )arriage annulled (SS*+: ,-. a finding that 'sychological (ncapacity is curable will not warrant a petition for annulment of marriage under Art. "#/ *pon recommendation of one of the psychiatrists that the psychological incapacity is curable because B is referred for 0psychological e aluation to determine benchmarks of current psychological functioning1 & ,%-.2 %AT(-: A recommendation for therapy does not automatically imply curability. (n general, recommendations for therapy are gi en by clinical psychologists, or e en psychiatrists, to manage beha ior. 3r. 3ayan4s recommendation that respondent should undergo therapy does not necessarily negate the finding that respondent4s psychological incapacity is incurable. )oreo er, 3r. 3ayan, during her testimony, categorically declared that respondent is psychologically incapacitated to perform the essential marital obligations.