Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
0
ks Sk
20%
0
k
s
S
k
40%
0
k
s
S
k
60%
0
k
s
S
k
25 1496 50 1596 6.6 1562 34 1629 -40
35 1516 70 1602 9.8 1573 40 1909 -32
45 1536 100 1608 18 1593 57.5 1520 67.5
Results and Discussion
The precision of obtained values of ultrasonic
velocity (U), measurements is good. The U
0
Corresponding to pure water increases with
temperature. The observed value 1465.84 ms
-1
is in
good agreement with literature value i.e. 1465.13 ms
-1
.
For water, adiabatic compressibility B
0
ad and
partial
Landge et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol. 3 Issue 3 July 2013(106-112)
109
molar compressibility
0
K
s,
decrease with
temperature. The carbohydrates are structure makers
due to the hydrogen bonding between the water
dipoles and OH groups of the carbohydrates. The
increase in ultrasonic velocity on the addition of
glucose is the case of increase in compressibility
which is due to the utilization of greater number of
water molecules with increase in glucose
concentration. The variation of ultrasonic velocity in a
solution depends on the intermolecular free length on
mixing. On the basis of a model for sound propagation
proposed by Erying and Kincaid
[12,13]
. Ultrasonic
velocity increases on decrease of free length and vice
versa. L
f
is a predominant factor in determining the
variation of ultrasonic velocity in fluids and their
solutions. In the present study, L
f
increases with
temperatures in all the system i.e. 0.0%, to 60%
ethanol-water mixture. The (Z) values increases with
temperatures in aqueous medium only but exactly
reverse observations are found in 20%, 40%and 60%
ethanol-water mixtures, where the (Z) value decreases
with temperatures and also with percentage of ethanol-
water mixtures i.e. from 20%to 60%. The increase of
R
a
with concentration suggests that salvation of solute
predominates over the breaking up of the solvent
aggregates (ethanol-water or others)
[14,15].
As the
temratures of solution rises, the aggregates of solvent
molecules breaks down, resulting in increased
salvation of solute by free solvent molecule and there
by increase in R
a
with increase in temperatures. The
value of R
a
increases with concentration and
temperatures. It decreases in 0%, 20%, 40% and 60%
ethanol-water. The L
f
increases with temperatures in
all the systems i.e. an aqueous, 20%, 40% and 60%
ethanol-water mixtures at various temperatures are set
out in table 3 and their plots are as shown in figure 4 to
6.
Figure 1: Concentration Vs Ultrasonic velocity
Figure 2: Concentration Vs Adiabatic Compressibility
Landge et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol. 3 Issue 3 July 2013(106-112)
110
Figure 3: Concentration Vs apparent molar compressibility
Figure 4: Concentration Vs Inter molecular free length
Figure 5: Concentration Vs specific acoustic impedance
Landge et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol. 3 Issue 3 July 2013(106-112)
111
Figure 6: Concentration Vs relative association
Table 3
intermolecular free length, specific acoustic impedance and relative association of Glucose in aqueous and
20%, ethanol-water medium at different temperatures
C
m/l
0.0% at 25
o
c 20% at 25
o
c
L
f
A
0
Z 10
4
kg/sec/m
R
a
Lf
A
o
Z 10
4
kg/sec/m
R
a
0.1 414.89 15.09 1.00 3.961 15.60 1.01
0.4 404.66 15.64 1.02 3.910 15.98 1.02
0.7 394.68 16.19 1.04 3.864 16.34 1.05
1.0 385.23 16.74 1.05 3.817 16.71 1.07
1.3 379.61 17.15 1.07 3.775 17.08 1.09
1.5 376.28 17.41 1.08 3.745 17.32 1.11
2.0 368.67 18.03 1.11 3.678 17.93 1.14
20%at 35
o
c 20%at 45
o
c
L
f
A
0
Z 10
4
kg/sec/m
R
a
Lf A
o
Z 10
4
kg/sec/m
R
a
4.031 15.52 1.01 4.099 15.48 1.00
3.985 15.88 1.03 4.053 15.83 1.03
3.941 16.22 1.05 4.033 16.19 1.05
3.891 16.61 1.07 3.958 16.55 1.07
3.853 16.93 1.09 3.912 16.88 1.09
3.826 17.93 1.10 3.885 17.14 1.10
3.762 17.73 1.14 3.816 17.73 1.14
The salvation number (S
n
) is calculated using equation
suggested by Passynski, Wada and Nomura et al. The
values of S
n
derived from equation were (0.07) in 20%
and (0.25) in 40% of glucose , it is well established
that glucose molecule forms hydrogen bonds with
water through the OH groups which are five in
number. The fractional number less than 1, observed is
rather difficult to explain. It is certainly not due to any
experimental error or an error in calculations. Possibly,
it indicates the limitation of Wadas equation for its
application for non-electrolyte.
Conclusion
The allied parameters were used to discuss in
the light of solute-solvent interactions in solution
chemistry. In present study the change in apparent
molar compressibility with glucose concentration is
observed linear.
Acknowledgement
The authors are thankful to Dr. R.K. Ippar
Principal, Vaidyanath Arts, Science and Commerce
College, Parli-vaijnath, Dist-Beed for encouragement
Landge et al. Int. J. Res. Chem. Environ. Vol. 3 Issue 3 July 2013(106-112)
112
and U.G.C. New Delhi for a research grants through
minor research project.
References
1. Nozdrev V. F., Applications of ultrasonics in molecular
physics, Gorden and Breach, New York, (1963)
2. Synder W. J and Synder J. R., Velocity of sound in
binary mixtures of benzene, hexane and methanol at 0 to 60
o
C., Journal of Chem. and Engg. Data, 19, 270 (1974)
3. Patil K.J., Manwatkar S.M. and Dhondge S.S., Viscosity,
B- coefficient and apparent molar volume studies of
electrolytes in aqueous salt solutions at 25
o
C., Indian J. of
Chem., 33 A ,4-9 (1994)
4. Nikam P. S, and Hasan. M., Temperature and
concentration dependence ultrasonic velocity and allied
parameters of monochloroacetic acid in aqueous medium,
Indian Journal of Pure and App. Physics, 24, 502-505
(1986)
5. Sharma P., Chauhan S., Chauhan M.S. and Syal V.K.,
Utrasonic velocity and viscosity studies of tramacip and
parvodex in binary mixtures of alcohols + water., Indian
Journal of Pure and Applied Physics, 46, 839-843 (2008)
6. Jahagirdar D. V, Arbad B. R , Mirgane S. R., Lande M.
K. and Shankarwar. A. G., Acoustical properties of four
different drugs in methanol, Journal of Molecular Liquids,
75, 33-43, (1998)
7. Jahagirdar D.V. , Arbad B. R., Walvekar A. A., and
Shankarwar A. G., Studies in partial molar volumes, partial
molar compressibilities and viscosity B-coefficients of
caffeine in water at four temperatures., Journal of Molecular
Liquids, 85,361-373, (2000)
8. Ahmed A., Djibrilla A. , Clerge T. and Clement S.,
Physico-chemical properties of Palnyra palm (Borassus
aethiopum mart) fruits from Northern Cameroon, Africian
Journal of Food Science , 4 (3), 115-119, (2010)
9. Ciocirlan O., Croitoru O. and Iulian O., Densities and
viscosities for binary mixtures of 1-butyl-3-
methylmidazolium tetrafluoroborate ionic liquid with
molecular solvents, Journal of Chem. Engg. and Data,
56(4), 1526-1534,( 2011)
10. Fend S., Padmanabhan S., Blanch H. W. and
Prausnitz. J. M., Viscosities of acetate or chloride ionic
liquids and some of their mixtures with water or other
common solvents, Journal of Chem. and Engg. Data, 56
(1), 31-34, (2011)
11. Olagbende S. O., Ogbonnia S. O., Coker H. A. B. and
Ukpo G. E., Blood glucose lowering effect of aqueous
extract of graptophyllum pictum griff on alloxan-induced
diabetic rats and its acute., African Journal of
Biotechnology, 10 (6),1039-1043, (2011)
12. Gupta A., Srivastava R. and Pandey A., Acoustical
studies on molecular interaction of ascorbic acid and
aqueous sacharide solution at different temperatures, Global
Advance Research Journal of Chem. and Mat. Science, 1
(3), 39-54, (2012)
13. Erying H. and Kincaid. J.F., Free volumes and fre angle
ratios of molecules in liquids, Journal of Electro Chemistry,
37, 705, (1931)
14. Chaudhari A., Shankarwar A.G., Arbad B.R. and
Mehrotra S.C., Dielectric relaxation in glycine-water and
glycine-ethanol water solutions using Time Domain
Technique., J. of Solution Chem., 33 (3), 313-322, (2004)
15. Landge M. G., Badade S.S, and Kendre. B. V., Density,
Ultrasonic velocity and viscosity measurements of glucose-
alcohol-water mixtures at various temperatures,
International Journal of Research in Chemistry and
environment, 3 (1), 348-352, (2013)