Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
1. Redefine Charity to include venture and R&D investments, in companies whose proprietors earn, or are from a family that earns, less than the median household income.
Most charities & foundations are nothing more than tax free investment schemes as is, used by the wealthy to avoid costly income and capital gains tax. Typically these foundations and charities pay the founder and every member of their family a substantial income, and constitutionally call for multigenerational wealth preservation as the primary goal. An Investor who takes the risk of investing in start-up and early stage companies that are not well funded by the proprietor, typically buy into a story value and have some level of emotional tie, believing the business will truly change the way the society currently does something. Average returns for venture investors are negative from the period 2000 - 2013 according to the Preqin Quarterly Index (-2.5%), and investors assume tremendous
amount of risk for investing in venture and research and development projects. Those that succeed generate a tremendous financial return; however they also generate tremendous social benefits, such as careers. Yes many people want a job, but a job at an entrepreneurial firm that succeeds typically launches long-term successful careers for all of the early and mid-stage employees of the company. Other benefits include the Wealth that is created both through the jobs, as well as phenomenal incentive packages that typically include ownership in the company. New innovative products and services that raise the standard of living for the majority of society benefit lower and middle class families the most. Further, when companies succeed they always give back to their country and local communities either directly through charitable funds for causes such as education, chronic illnesses, poverty, and many more. When a company succeeds and the investors exit, they are taxed then for their capital gains, this allows the government to invest
in infrastructure. Typically the founders start community foundations, host community events and much more. Finally, the hot issue of the wage gap between the wealthy and the poor would be solved by this simple solution. Encouraging lower and middle class entrepreneurs to organize and prepare to pursue their dreams knowing that there are wealthy individuals looking to make investments in lower and middle class entrepreneurs for the tax break. If Washington was truly concerned with growing the economy they would provide venture and research and development investors with the same tax breaks provided to those who donate to charity, for all industries, not just those that politicians feel are important.
2. Provide companies a tax-efficient way to repatriate their offshore cash, as long as they reinvested into growth projects.
With many US corporations sitting on hundreds of billions of dollars
3. Streamline Liquid Natural Gas (LNG) Export Terminals, Build Keystone XL Pipeline, and lift the ban on exporting US oil.
Our obsession with being pro-trade for some goods and anti-trade for others has to end. If companies or governments from another country are willing to pay a better price for our goods, that money comes back to the US and is reinvested here, creating high-paying jobs, and often entire new industries in port cities across the US. Vice versa is true as well, if we are able to buy goods of equal quality for a lower price from companies (or governments in some countries) abroad, that is money saved here in the US, allowing the consumer more money to spend on other goods. The argument against trade is typically related to lost jobs and outsourcing overseas, the truth is, there are still experts needed at home, and while there may be some lost jobs, those who adjust will likely earn a higher wage before as their position becomes a specialty domestically. Efficiency and a lack of waste is
always good for the economy, and disproportionately benefits the lower and middle class. If Washington was truly concerned with growing the economy, they would pass guidance or laws if needed to streamline the permitting process for LNG and end the ban on exporting US oil. Here in the US, thanks to technological innovation in the fossil fuel extraction methods, and the natural gas combustion methods, we are seeing a minirenaissance in the oil and gas industry, however outdated, misguided laws and regulations are preventing the economy, and further the American people from reaping the benefits. Everything from the exploration of land for oil or gas, to the transportation process, refining the raw commodity into the various derivatives to the sale process is ripe with opportunities for the federal government to put enormous barricades in your way using the various federal, state and local energy bureaucracies. Everybody in the US has publicly witnessed the convoluted process for getting anything done in the energy
Authors Opinion
While all my points may seem like no-brainer, common-sense solutions, the ivory tower intellectual elitists that politicians, often elitist lawyers, surround themselves with know that the more convoluted and confusing their solution the more power they have over the people, allowing them to use their position to grant favors and privileges to their cronies while placing their political opponents at a regulatory disadvantage.