Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
org
The preparation of this report has been financed in part by the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development Highway Safety Department July
Contents
1. Bike Easy Audit Tool (BAT): Rationale ....................................................................................................... 2 2. Measuring Encouragement ....................................................................................................................... 2 3. How BAT Works ........................................................................................................................................ 3 4. BAT Variable Rationale.............................................................................................................................. 4 5. BAT Variable Definitions ........................................................................................................................... 5 6. How is BAT different from BikeScore? ...................................................................................................... 6 7. Limitations and Future Research .............................................................................................................. 6 Works Cited ................................................................................................................................................... 8 Low-Stress Cycling Audit Instrument ............................................................................................................ 9
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
2. Measuring Encouragement
While research on the specific dimensions of low-stress cycling street characteristics is still emerging (Mekuria et al 2012), current research on desired bicycle facilities in both Portland (Dill and McNeil 2013) and Vancouver (Winters and Teschke 2010) shows that low-volume, low-stress streets with dedicated facilities are generally most encouraging to cycling. The Bike Easy Audit Tool (BAT) takes these finding and transforms them into a user-friendly data collection tool for community members that can be readily transformed into actionable information in discussions with transportation professionals and policymakers. Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
At the core of the BAT approach is a straightforward premise based on this current research: lowvolume, low-speed streets that have dedicated bicycle facilities that are continuous and unobstructed are more inviting to a wide demographic than streets lacking these characteristics. The BAT focuses on six key characteristics of low-stress bicycling conditions: Presence of bicycle facilities Presence of a dedicated, separated space for cyclists Continuousness of facilities Presence of obstructions/debris Posted speed of the roadway Intensity of traffic.
While there are many factors associated with bicycling comfort that can be collected in a comprehensive analysis of corridor safety (Nabors et al 2012), these six characteristics capture the key dimensions of bikeability, and simultaneously can be reasonably collected through citizen, crowd-sourced data collection. The approachs focus on data collection by citizens differentiates it from more technical lowstress cycling analysis by Mekuria et al (2012). The use of readily available data provides an opportunity for citizen data collection to audit multiple linear bicycle corridors to track both micro-level conditions (Schlossberg et al 2012) and the presence or absence of innovative treatments across an entire area. BAT is designed to both capture these conditions individually for mapping purposes and simultaneously produce a comprehensive bikeability encouragement score for roadway segments. These segment scores can be put together in GIS to produce a bikeability encouragement map that can be scaled up from a corridor all the way to city scale. In this way, BAT provides for a type of gap analysis between best practice designs advocated for at the national level and what is currently on the ground locally. This provides a key opportunity for citizens to engage in a constructive discussion with transportation planners and policymakers about how to improve bicycling conditions based on solid data.
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
BAT also asks for a self-categorization of the surveyor to help classify the bicyclist type. This helps to distinguish a fit and fearless bicyclist rating from that of a low-stress bicyclist. A diversity of surveyors could help to provide a deeper understanding of user perceptions of differing locations.
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
addressed by Mekuria et al (2012), but more research is needed to create a citizen audit instrument that simply captures key intersection characteristics. Finally, the tool focuses on on-street conditions. It is not designed to quantify adjacent trails that can be an important component of a low-stress cycling system. Cycle tracks are, however, included in the tool. Despite these limitations, the tool provides a broad, accessible system to capture current bikeability encouragement conditions in neighborhoods across the country. In addition, each variable collected can be disaggregated from the scoring component for mapping purposes and to show change in specific conditions over time. This flexibility allows users to create customizable maps for specific purposes. It is hoped that this accessible, flexible system will spur transportation planners, policy makers, and citizens to engage in evaluating the current conditions in their neighborhoods and work towards building more low-stress, bikeable streets.
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
Works Cited
Dill, J., and Gliebe, J. P. 2008. Understanding and measuring bicycling behavior: A focus on travel time and route choice (No. OTREC-RR-08-03). Dill, J., and McNeil, N. 2013. Four Types of Cyclists? Examining A Typology to Better Understand Biycling Behavior and Potential. Transportation, 17, 18. Geller, Roger. 2009. Four Types of Cyclists, City of Portland, Office of Transportation. http://www.portlandoregon.gov/transportation/44597?a=237507 LaPlante, J., and McCann, B. 2008. Complete streets: we can get there from here. ITE JOURNAL, 78(5), 24. Mekuria, M. C., Furth, P. G., and Nixon, H. 2012. Low-Stress Bicycling and Network Connectivity. Mineta Transportation Institute, College of Business, San Jos State University. Nabors, D., Goughnour, E., Thomas, L., DeSantis, W., Sawyer, M., and Moriarty, K. 2012. Bicycle Road Safety Audit Guidelines and Prompt Lists (No. FHWASA12018). National Association of City Transportation Officials (NACTO). 2011. Urban Bikeway Design Guide. http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/design-guide/ Pedestrian Bicycle Resource Initiative. 2013. New Orleans Multi-Tool Pedestrian Safety Study. New Orleans Regional Planning Commission. www.pbrila.org/research Renne, J., Fields, B., and Maret, I. 2009. Auditing Neighborhoods, Streets, and Intersections for Pedestrian Safety: A Toolkit for Communities. http://transportation.uno.edu/phirecontent/assets/files/PBRI-Auditing-Neighborhoods-Streets-and-Intersections-for-Pedestrian-Safety.pdf Schlossberg, M., Evers, C., Kato, K., and Brehm, C. 2012. Active transportation, citizen Engagement and livability: coupling citizens and Smartphones to Make the change. URISA Journal, 25(2). Winters, M. 2013. Bike Score: Does Urban Bikeability Predict Cycling Behavior? Presentation at the Active Living Research Conference. San Diego, CA Feb. 27, 2013. Winters, M., and Teschke, K. 2010. Route preferences among adults in the near market for bicycling: findings of the Cycling in Cities study. American Journal of Health Promotion, 25(1), 40-47.
Regional Planning Commission for Orleans, Jefferson, Plaquemines, St. Bernard, and St. Tammany Parishes
Question 1 2 3 4 5 6
Bike Facility Availability Is there a bike facility? Bike Facility Quality Is there a dedicated, separated space for bicyclists on the roadway? Is there a continuous facility for the entire block (excluding intersection)? Are there obstructions/debris or road surface hazards on the facility? Speed Road Intensity Total Score
Score If yes, add 5. If no, score 0 Score If no, subtract 1 If no, subtract 1 If yes, subtract 1 If posted speed is above 30 mph, subtract 1 If this is a major street, subtract 1. (Note: If ADT data is available, major street is above 20,000. If data is unavailable, this is your own opinion) Add all rows together for final score
Bicycle Facility Type (circle) bike lane buffered bike lane contra flow bike lane green lane cycletrack bicycle boulevard Unsure? Take a picture and visit NACTO for identification: http://nacto.org/cities-for-cycling/design-guide/ A Little Bit About You Please circle the I feel comfortable riding my I feel comfortable riding I feel comfortable riding statement that best bike on any street in any on a designated bicycle only on quiet streets or describes you condition facility on trails/paths sharrow other none