updatedver.

14

Workshop&FocusGroupDiscussion(FGD)

CitizenMedia(Online) EthicsCode Code*Drafting

September16th,2011 09.00s/d21.00WIB

liveStreaming

http://ictwatch.com/live

*)nametentative,othersoption:CodeofConduct,GeneralGuidance,etc

CitizenMedia(Online)EthicsCode*
BecomeacommonreferenceforthespecificIndonesian Internetuserthatruntheactivitiesofcommunicationand interactionwithothersincyberspace. Beingguidelineforthecommunitytomaximizethepositive impactoftheInternetandminimizenegativeimpacts resultingfromitsregularuse. Becometheformofselfregulation forInternetusersin generalthatmayimpactbetterthansimplywaitingforor involvingtheroleofotherparties/government. Beingoneofthesupporttogrowanddevelopqualityand quantityoflocalpositivecontentthatcanbringbenefitfor the h personal, l community i orsociety. i
*)nametentative,othersoption:CodeofConduct,GeneralGuidance,etc

Relateddraft(Bahasa): 1. 12Butir Kesepakatan Etika Ngeblog

http://www.perempuanindonesia.org/?p=1061

Other

2. 3 3. 4. 5.

Kode Etik BloggerIndonesia

http://blog.kenz.or.id/2009/08/02/kodeetikbloggerindonesia.html#more1279

Kode Etik Pengguna Internet

http://kompasiana.com/post/internet/2010/10/21/etikadalambidangit

Kode Etik BlogAnggara

http://anggara.org/blogregulation/kodeetikblog/

Kode Etik Konten Multimedia

http://openstorage.gunadarma.ac.id/handouts/S1_Sistem%20Informasi/ETIKA%20dan%20Profesi %20TSI/DRAFT_KODE_ETIK_KONTEN_MULTIMEDIA.pdf

Relateddraft(English):
BandungDeclaration http://nus.academia.edu/CatherineCandano/Papers/326956/Bandung_Declarati on_of_Open_Cultures_Technologies_and_Ecologies _ _ p _ _ g _ _ g http://www.ojr.org/ojr/wiki/ethics/ http://www.cyberjournalist.net/news/000215.php http://www.buzzle.com/articles/netiquetteinternetethics.html http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1087.txt http://www ietf org/rfc/rfc1087 txt http://blogging.wikia.com/wiki/Blog_Wiki:Blogger%27s_Code_of_Conduct

1. Theethicoftransparency Webelievepublicdeservestoknowaboutusandour perspecti etobetterjudge perspective j dgewhat hatwe esay sa 2. Theethicofconversation Wedonotbelieveinonesidedlectures.Webelieve conversationleadstobetterunderstanding 3. Theethicofhumanity Webelievecitizenmedialivesatahumanlevelwhileold medialivesataninstitutionallevel 4. Theethicofthelink Webelieveoneofourkeyjobsistolinkpublictoothervoices /sourcematerialsotheymayjudgethemselves 5 Theethicofcorrection 5. Webelieveitisnotaboutmakenomistakeatall,butthe mostimportantistocorrecterrorsquicklyandopenly
Sources:DanGillmor,JeffJarvis,DonnyBU

Example:10PracticalCitizenMediaEthics

6. Theethicofimmediacy Webelievethefastspreadofinformationwilldeliverbetter q alit ofinformation quality 7. Theethicofpluralism Webelievethespirit p ofp pluralisminthedisseminationof informationwillprovidemanybenefitstosociety 8. Theethicofaccuracy Webelieveaccurateinformationisamust, must resultedfrom checkandrecheckprocesstoobtainfactualdata f 9. Theethicoffairness Webelieveweshouldbeawareofwhatdrivesus,andalways willingtolistentothosewhodisagree 10 Theethicofsharing 10. Webelievetheknowledgebasedsocietyisnothingwithout thespiritandfreedomofideaandinformationsharing
Sources:DanGillmor,JeffJarvis,DonnyBU

Example:10PracticalCitizenMediaEthics

toactivelysupport,encourage,promoteandprovide: openplatformsforcommunication,dialogueandinteraction openandunhinderedformsofartisticandculturalexpression theuseanddevelopmentofopenandfreetechnologies newformsofcollaborative,inclusiveandemancipatory digitalpractice multidisciplinary,crossgenerationalandtransregionaldialogueandexchange openaccesstoinformation,networksandknowledge dedicatedphysicalspacescommittedtolongtermandstablecommunitybuilding torecognise: thatknowledgeandinformationareinherentlymobileandactasbridgesbetweencultures tensionsbetweensystems,usingtheseascatalyststostrengthenopenexpression th autonomy the t of fartistic ti ti and dcultural lt lpractice ti theneedtoactivelyfacilitatefreeexpressionwhereitmaybeunderthreat thatadigitaldivideexistswhichhindersthedevelopmentofcivilsociety risktaking,curiosity,selfinitiativeandspeculativeexploration thattherearesilentzones,isolatedpeoplesandspacesthatmustbegiventheopportunitytobeheardand becomevisiblemembersofanetworkedcommunityundertheirfreewill thatfreecultureandopenartisticexpressionimproveeconomicandenvironmental conditions,actingascatalystsofsustainablehumandevelopment toentrench: efficiency,responsibilityandsustainabilityofpracticevisavis natural&culturalresources pluralismandfreedomofexpressioninartisticandculturalpractice toleranceandengagementof'otherness'whilerepudiatinghate,injusticeanddiscrimination respectfortheinteractionbetweenenvironmentalandculturalsystems responsivepracticesofcivicandsocialempowerment collectiveintelligencethroughanopensharingofknowledgeandskills criticalandreflectivethoughtarticulatedthroughbestpracticeandpolicies

Canbeflexibly adapted p by y anyoneinvarious regionsof differentcustoms &culture.

Canbeadjusted withoutg great efforttofollow thechanging timesandthe latesttechnology

Canbeeasily understoodand implemented whetherby individualsor variousgroups.

Adaptable

Adjustable

Doable

RespectLocalWisdom,DiversityandFreedomofExpression

Howto Communicate withOther(s) People

Howto Produce & Deliver Information

Howto Protect P Personal l Privacy& Security

Suggestionfortheethicscodecontent

Oth ? Others?

Intellectual Property Right?

Information Transparency &Accuracy?

Negative Content Limitation?

Freedomof Speech?

TheEthics Code Draft

Online Privacy& Security?

PointofViews

initiated & run by ICT Watch since 2002

Downloadathttp://internetsehat.org

OtherSource:INTERNETSEHATcontent

300respondents

100respondents

Preliminary1(3questions) 16Juli Pontianak 16Juli Surabaya 23Juli Semarang 23Juli Medan 30Juli Jogja

Preliminary2(15questions) 5Agustus Pekanbaru 9Agustus Makassar 10Agustus Ambon 16Agustus Madura 18Agustus Palembang

OnSiteSurvey&InformalDiscussion

1 11September2011

1 11September2011

WebStudy
16July 18August2011

Online Survey
475respondents
http://ictwatch.com/id/survey

16September2011

OnSite S Survey & Discussion

TheEthics Code Draft

Focus G Group Discussion

Activitytodeveloptheoutput(draft)

PreliminarySurveyResult ofOnlineEthics
b ICTW by: Watch h/2011

Layanan yg Anda gunakan untuk salurkan ekspresi/informasi k i/i f i (boleh b l h lebih l bih dari d i 1)

Slideshare 1%

Forum 7% Google+ 10%

Blog 20%

Youtube 11% Flickr 2% Facebook 31%

Twitter 18%

Preliminary1(300respondents)

Secara umum saat orang lainsampaikan ekspresinya via I t Internet t

TidakBeretika 2%

SudahBeretika 30% BelumBeretika 68%

Preliminary1(300respondents)

Halterpenting untuk masuk dalam kode etik onlineadalah tentang g (p pilih 1saja j )
Tatacara menjagaprivasi &sekuriti pribadi/ personal 23%

Tatacara memproduksi/ menyampaikan informasi 34%

Tatacara berkomunikasi denganpihak /oranglain 43%

Preliminary1(300respondents)

Sumber informasi onlineyangkapan saja &dimana saja A d akses Anda k

Blog 11%

MediaOnline 20% Chatroom 0% Forum 6% Mailinglist 8%

Facebook 53%

Twitter 2%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Alat informasi yangpalingsering Anda gunakan untuk online? li ?

Pc/Laptop disekolah/kamp us 22% Ponsel/BB l/ 27% PC/Laptopdi kantor 6% Warnet 6% PC/Laptopdi rumah 39%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Pernahkah sedikitbanyak nama/reputasi Anda di ik oleh dirugikan l h seseorang di Internet? I t t?

diMailinglist 1% diTwitter 0% diKomentar diForum 4% berita 0% diChatroom 0% diBlog 5%

diFacebook 34%

TidakPernah! 56%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Pernahkah sedikitbanyak Anda merugikan nama/reputasi / t i seseorang di Internet I t t

Ya, ,diForum Ya,diChatroom 5% 6% Ya,diMailinglist 0% Ya,diTwitter 0% Ya,diFacebook 35% TidakPernah! 51% Ya,diKomentar berita 0% Ya,diBlog 3%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan onlineyangpalingrentan terjadinya pencemaran nama baik b ik

Difitur komentar artikel Chatroom Forum media 6% 4% (berita) Mailinglist online 5% 6% Twitter 15% Blog 1%

Facebook 63%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Ketika menyampaikan/menyajikan informasi,mana yangharus h did h l k didahulukan

Kecepatan penyajiannya 16%

AkurasiFaktanya 84%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan y onliney yang gp paling gbaik akurasi faktanya y

Facebook Twitter 8% 3% Mailinglist Blog 18% 7%

Forum 13% Media(berita) online 49% Chatroom 2%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan y onliney yang gp paling gburuk akurasi faktanya y

Media(berita) online 3% Blog 4%

Chatroom 24% Facebook 57%

Forum 4% Mailinglist 5% Twitter 3%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan onlineyangpalingbaik kecepatan penyajian i f informasinya i

Blog 10%

Facebook 16% Twitter 12%

Media(berita) online 42%

Mailinglist 7% Forum Chatroom 7% 6%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan onlineyangpalingburuk kecepatan penyajian i f informasinya i

Blog 20%

Facebook 23%

Media(berita) online li 9% Chatroom 6% Forum 7%

Twitter 14% Mailinglist 21%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Sumber informasi onlineyangpalingbaik akurasi DAN k kecepatannya t

Blog 17%

Facebook 20% Twitter 9% Mailinglist 5%

Media(berita) online 31% Forum 14% Chatroom 4% %

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Pilih 3(tiga) topik sosial palinglayak/positif sebagai di k i prokontra diskusi k t di Internet I t t

Suku/Ras 0% Agama 7% Keuangan 0% Keamanan 4% Politik 20% % Hukum 20% Kesehatan 8%

Pekerjaan 5% Seksualitas 3% Kemiskinan 5%

Pendidikan 22% Kesehatan 6%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Pilih 3(tiga) topik diskusi onlineyg palingrentan terjadi d b t kusir debat k i s/d /dkecaman: k
Keuangan Suku/Ras 5% 5% Agama 10% Keamanan 3% Politik 21% Kesehatan 7% Pendidikan 12%

Hukum 20%

Pekerjaan 7% %

Kesehatan 0% Kemiskinan Seksualitas 5% 5% %

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan onlineyangpalingdapat menjadi tempat di k i prokontra diskusi k t positif itif

Difitur komentarberita 13% Chatroom 0% Facebook F b k 28% Forum 26% Blog 0%

Twitter 8% Mailinglist 25%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Layanan onlineyangpalingmungkin terjadinya debat k i s/d kusir /dkecaman k

Difitur Blog komentarberita 0% 9% Chatroom 11% Forum F 14% Mailinglist 11%

Facebook 40%

Twitter 15%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Seberapa penting pengguna Internetmemiliki & mematuhi t hi kode k d etik tik online li
TidakPenting 1% Biasasaja 15%

Penting 22%

SangatPenting 62%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Seberapa tahu Anda tentang istilah Creative C Commons

SangatTahu 0% Tahu 19% TidakTahu 39% PernahDengar 42%

Preliminary2(100respondents)

Landasan terpenting dalam acuan/panduan etika online li

perlindungan hakatas kekayaan intelektual 12% peningkatan transparansi danakurasi i f informasi i 15% p g pengamanan privasidan sekuritidi ranahmaya 12%

p pembatasan kontennegatif (SARA Pornografidll) 34%

penegakan kebebasan berekspresi/ber pendapat 27% 2 %

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

MediayangpalingAnda andalkan untuk menyampaikan ik pendapat/ekspresi d t/ k i Anda A d

Wiki 1% Blog 14% Chatroom 1%

SocialNetwork 59%

Forum 19%

Mailinglist 1% MicroBlog 5%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Perlukah dan sudah adakah acuan/panduan etika online li khas kh Indonesia I d i

TidakPerludan BelumAda 1% TidakPerlutapi SudahAda 3%

PerludanSudah Ada 27% PerlutapiBelum Ada 69%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Porsi terbesar untuk masuk di dalam acuan/panduan etika tik online li

Etikamenjagae privasi&e sekuritipersonal 17% Etika berkomunikasi denganpihak/ oranglain 49%

Etika memproduksi/ menyampaikan informasi 34%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Secara umum pengguna InternetIndonesiasaat online atau t ketika k tik menyampaikan ik pendapatnya d t via i I Internet: t t
TidakBeretika 3%

SudahBeretika 25% KurangBeretika 72%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Sumber informasi onlinedariolehuntuk warga yang PALINGsering i Anda A d baca b

Wiki 5%

Blog 19%

Social Networking 45%

Forum 22%

Microblog 6%

MailingList 3%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Sumber informasi onlinedariolehuntuk warga yang pelakunya l k BELUM/KURANGberetika b tik

Wiki 1% Blog 4%

Chatroom 21% Social Networking 52%

Forum 16%

Microblog 4% %

Mailinglist 2%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Sumber informasi onlinedariolehuntuk warga yang pelakunya l k SUDAHberetika b tik

Wiki 28%

Blog 16%

Chatroom 1%

Social Networking 5% MicroBlogging 5% MailingList 10% 0%

Forum 35%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Mediakomunikasi INTERNETSEHATberikut ini yang sudah rutin Anda akses/baca/lihat / / (jawaban boleh lebih (j dari 1):
YOUTUBE 10% BelumAda 8%

TWITTER 25%

FACEBOOK 29%

SITUS 26%

FLICKR 2%

SurveyOnline(475respondents)

Workshop&FGDPlan forCommunity
b September by: S b 16th,2011

Participants
September16th,2011 09.00 21.00WIB
LiveStreaming

(tobeinvited)

CivilSociety/OtherCommunityReps.
1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. 9. 10. 0. 11. 12. 13. 14 14. 15. 16. 17. JalinMerapi (Community) Karya TunaNetra (Community) KasKus (Community) ( ) Relawan TIK(Community) SalingSilang (Community) Blog/ForumDetik (Community) Kompasiana (Community) BlogVaganza (Community) TVKomunitas Online(Community) AirPutih ut ( (Foundation) ou dat o ) Satu Dunia (Foundation) WikiIndonesia(Foundation) idIGFCommittee(Initiative) Akademi Berbagi (Initiative) ArusPelangi (Initiative) InternetSehat (Initiative) idblogNetwork (Initiative)

CommunityRepresentative
O id J Outside Java I id Java Inside J

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6. 7. 8. 9 9.

Palembang Pekanbaru Medan d Pontianak Ambon E d Ende Makassar Denpasar M d Madura

1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6 6. 7. 8.

Surabaya Jogja Solo l Semarang Malang B d Bandung Bogor JaBoDe TB k TaBek

OfficialMediaPartner:

AgendaDay1(September16th,2011):
09.00 09.15:Opening 09.15 10.30:Sharing1(Ministry,APJII,PANDI) 10.30 11.45:Sharing2(ICJR,AJI) (host:Rapin M.) 11.45 13.15: break,Fridaypraying,lunch 13.15 13.30:InternetSehat BookletRelease 13.30 15.00:Sharing3(Google,Nukman L.) (host:Onno WPurbo) 15.00 15.15: break&FGDpreparation 15.15 16.00:FGDSession1 (host:Idaman A.) 16.00 19.00: break,dinner 19.00 19 00 20.45 20 45:FGDSession2 (host:Idaman A.) 20.45 21.00:WrapUpSession+Closing
Gatot Dewabroto*(ICTMinistry/Kominfo.go.id) Topic:SelfRegulationonInternetCommunity SammyPangerapan (ISPAssociation/APJII.or.id) Topic:InternetServicesforCommunity Andi Budimansyah (ccTLD.id/PANDI.or.id) Topic:Domain.idasaCommunityIdentity Nukman Luthfie (NewMediaExpert/Virtual.co.id) Topic:BestPracticesonIndonesianOnlineEthics Anggara (PublicInterestLawyer/ICJR.or.id) Topic:FreedomofSpeechontheNet Nezar Patria(PressAlliance/AJIindonesia.org) Topic:NewMediaonTodayPerspective
*) tobeconfirmed

AgendaDay2(September17th,2011)
07.00 08.30: breakfast&checkout** 08.30:Participants p g gotoAMPROKAN Bekasi (byshuttlebusprovided) host:Ajeng

RossLaJeunesse,Head,PublicPolicyand G Aff Gov Affairs, i G Google l Asia A i P Pacific ifi AnnLavin,Head,PublicPolicyandGov Affairs,Google SoutheastAsia MikeOrgill g ,Country yLead, ,PublicPolicy y & GovAffairs,Google SoutheastAsia

**)RoomsharingaccommodationatHarrishotelisavailableforparticipantsfromoutsidethegreater Jakarta(Jabodetabek +Bandung)only.TheOtherswillbefullreimbursedthecostofregulartaxi/transportation.

TheAllStars

You!Yes,You! RossLaJeunesse Onno Purbo Gatot Dewa Broto

MikeOrgill Anggara S. AnnLavin Nukman L. Rapin M

Andi Budimansyah Idaman A.

SammyPangerapan

Nezar Patria

updatedver.14

ContentEnrichmentby:ICTWatch,APJII,PANDI, XL,ACER,AJI,ICJR,VIRTUAL,GOOGLE,HIVOS

Person Email Twitter Phone

:arief /siti /acep :info[at]ictwatch.com :@internetsehat :021 98495770