Pumping Main Design

ECONOMICAL PUMPING MAIN CALCULATIONS
From Sump at Hill to OHSR
2014
Demand in lpm
Growth Rate( Percentage):
0.5
Base Year
Prospective
Ultimate
2014
2024
2034
MWL(OHSR)=
100.7
109
115
FVL(Sump)=
45.97
104.1667 104.16667
Design of Economic size of Pumping Main
1st 10 years
GL(Sump)=
46.97
2nd 10 Years
Year of Comm (Initial)
0.125 MLD
Discharge at Installation
0.125
0.131 MLD
Prospective
0.131 MLD
At end of 10 Years
0.131
0.138 MLD
Ultimate
0.138 MLD
Avg Discharge
0.128
0.135 MLD
Length of pipeline
115 LPM
569.00 M
Static Head for Pump
56.73 m
Combined Efficiency
Hours of Pumping at end of 10yrs
65 %
Cost of pumpset
16000 Rs./kw
15.63
15.65 Hrs
KW required @
0.050 H1
0.052 H2
65 %Efficiency
14 %
Avg days
Life of pumpsets
Energy charges
Hours of pumping
Stand By
10 years
Annual cost of electrical energy

Pump cost Captalised
Energy charges captalised
16 Hours
16
Average hours of Pumping for avg discharge
Interest rate
7.5 Rs./kw
16
365
365
42796.95 KW1
0.27
5.216
42847.83 KW2
0.27
5.216
50 %
INTERNAL DIA.
Design Period
Static Head for Pipes
Appx. Dia
67
mm
20
PIPE
CLASS
DIA (mm)
THICKNESS
55.73
HDPE
HDPE
HDPE
HDPE
HDPE
HDPE
8 Kg/sqcm
100
200
225
250
280
315
12.10
13.40
15.10
16.70
18.70
21.00
8 Kg/sqcm
8 Kg/sqcm
8 Kg/sqcm
8 Kg/sqcm
8 Kg/sqcm
Finished Item
cost (Rs. /RM)
C
75.80
173.20
194.80
216.60
242.60
273.00
140
140
140
140
140
140
947.00
1157.00
1448.00
1779.00
2214.00
2849.00
CR
E (Kg/m2)
1
1
1
1
1
1
90000000
90000000
90000000
90000000
90000000
90000000
Sl.No
1
2
3
4
4
5
Dia in mm
Type
Class
100
HDPE
8kg/sqcm
200
HDPE
8kg/sqcm
225
HDPE
10kg/sqcm
250
HDPE
10kg/sqcm
280
HDPE
10kg/sqcm
315
HDPE
10kg/sqcm
Static
head
55.73
55.73
55.73
55.73
55.73
55.73
water
hammer
Head
Total
Head
19.65
Head Limits
Pressure Check
Static
Pumping
75.38
80.00
80
OK
2.59
58.32
80.00
80
OK
2.18
57.91
100.00
80
OK
1.75
57.48
100.00
80
OK
1.10
56.83
100.00
80
OK
1.10
56.83
100.00
80
OK
Velocity
(m/s)
0.53
0.10
0.08
0.07
0.04
0.04
Pipe Desc
Pipe rate
Tot Cap cost

(Rs. in
lakhs)
100 HDPE-8kg/sqcm 947.00

225 HDPE-10kg/sqcm1448.00
The Most Economical Pipe is

100 HDPE-8kg/sqcm
Total head excluding W.H =
58.52 m <80 m, Hence O.K.
Total head including W.H =
78.17 m < 1.1x80m. Hence O.K., without providing water hammer controlling devices on pipe line.
Table 1 showing velocity and loss of Head for different pipe size
Dia in mm
Frictional Head loss per

1000 m
S.No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
1st stage
4.05
0.08
0.04
0.03
0.02
0.01
100
200
225
250
280
315
2nd stage
4.45
0.08
0.05
0.03
0.02
0.01
Velocity in m/s
I stage
flow
0.504
0.099
0.073
0.067
0.058
0.042
Total Head in 'm' for 569m pipe lengths including 56.73 m of static Head
II stage
flow
0.531
0.099
0.083
0.067
0.058
0.042
Frictional
Losses
2.30
0.05
0.02
0.02
0.01
0.01
I stage flow
Total in M
Other
Losses
0.23
59.26
0.00
56.78
0.00
56.76
0.00
56.75
0.00
56.74
0.00
56.74
Table II showing Kilowatts required and cost of Pump sets for differenct pipe sizes
S.No.
1st stage flow
Int dia of pipe
KW
required
H1
Total Head loss
1
2
100
200
59.26
56.78
4.40
4.22
II nd stage flow
Cost of
KW
H2
Pump set
required
Rs.in lakhs Total Head loss
0.70
59.52
4.66
0.68
56.78
4.45
Cost of
Pump set
Rs.in lakhs
0.75
0.71
II stage flow
Frictional Losses
Other
Losses
2.53
0.25
0.05
0.00
0.03
0.00
0.02
0.00
0.01
0.00
0.01
0.00
Total in M
59.52
56.78
56.76
56.75
56.74
56.74
18.94
19.55
21.20
23.08
25.56
29.17
3
4
5
6
225
250
280
315
56.76
56.75
56.74
56.74
4.22
4.22
4.22
4.22
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
56.76
56.75
56.74
56.74
4.44
4.44
4.44
4.44
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.71
Table III Showing comparative statement of overall cost structure of pumping main
Total Head in mts

S.No.
Int dia of pipe
1
2
3
4
5
6
100
200
225
250
280
315
1st Stage
59.26
56.78
56.76
56.75
56.74
56.74
Class of
2nd stage
Pipe reqd
59.52
56.78
56.76
56.75
56.74
56.74
8kg/sqcm
8kg/sqcm
10kg/sqcm
10kg/sqcm
10kg/sqcm
10kg/sqcm
Rate per
m length
(Rs.)
947.00
1157.00
1448.00
1779.00
2214.00
2849.00
1st stage of flow

Cost of
Annual cost
pipe line
Cost of
Energy charges
of energy
(Rs. in
pumpsets
capitalised
charges
lakhs)
5.39
6.58
8.24
10.12
12.60
16.21
0.70
0.68
0.67
0.67
0.67
0.67
1.89
1.81
1.81
1.81
1.80
1.80
9.83
9.42
9.42
9.42
9.41
9.41
Total
Capitalise
d cost
Cost of
pumpsets
15.93
16.68
18.33
20.21
22.69
26.30
0.75
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.71
0.71
2nd stage of flow

Annual cost
Energy
of energy
charges
charges
capitalised
2.00
1.90
1.90
1.90
1.90
1.90
10.41
9.94
9.93
9.93
9.93
9.93
Pipe
CR
PVC
PVC
HDPE
HDPE
AC
AC
CI
0.85
CI
DI
DI
PSC
PSC
BWSP
BWSP
GRP
GRP
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
160
155
Cap Cost
155
150
Series1
145
Pipe
Cap Cost
140
135
180 HDPE-8kg/sqcm
200 HDPE-8kg/sqcm
19.55
200 HDPE-8kg/sqcm
225 HDPE-8kg/sqcm
Pipe
e.
17
18
19
20
of flow
Grand
Intl cap
total
investmt for
Capitalise
p/s and
d (Rs. in
annual elec
3.01
2.87
2.87
2.87
2.87
2.87
18.94
19.55
21.20
23.08
25.56
29.17
PVC
HDPE
AC
CI
DI
PSC
BWSP
GRP
PVC
HDPE
AC
CI
DI
PSC
BWSP
63
63
80
80
100
350
250
350
4kg/sqcm 4kg/sqcm Class-10
LA
K7
6kg/sqcm
12kg/sqcm
75
75
100
100
125
400
300
400
K8
8kg/sqcm
14kg/sqcm
90
90
125
125
150
450
350
450
K9
10kg/sqcm
16kg/sqcm
110
110
150
150
200
500
400
500
10kg/sqcm Class-25
K10
12kg/sqcm
18kg/sqcm
125
125
200
200
250
600
450
600
14kg/sqcm
20kg/sqcm
140
140
250
250
300
700
500
700
16kg/sqcm
22kg/sqcm
160
160
300
300
350
800
600
800
24kg/sqcm
180
180
350
350
400
900
700
900
26kg/sqcm
200
200
400
400
450
1000
800
1000
28kg/sqcm
225
225
450
450
500
1100
900
250
250
500
500
600
1200
1000
280
280
600
600
700
1300
1100
315
315
355
400
700
750
800
850
700
750
800
900
750
800
900
1000
1200
1300
1400
1500
900
1000
1100
1600
1000
1050
1200
30kg/sqcm
IF(C36=$AO$2,$AO$3:$AO$5,IF(C36=$AP$2,$AP$3:$AP$6,IF(C36=$AQ$2,$AQ$3:$AQ$6,IF(C36=$
1000
PVC
GRP
HDPE
AC
CI
DI
PSC
BWSP
GRP
3Bar
315
400
1000
1050
1200
1300
1600
1000
6Bar
280
355
900
1000
1100
1200
1500
900
9Bar
250
315
850
900
1000
1100
1400
800
12Bar
225
280
800
800
900
1000
1300
700
15Bar
200
250
750
750
800
900
1200
600
22kg/sqcm
180
225
700
700
750
800
1100
500
24kg/sqcm
160
200
600
600
700
700
1000
450
26kg/sqcm
140
180
500
500
600
600
900
400
28kg/sqcm
125
160
450
450
500
500
800
350
30kg/sqcm
10
110
140
400
400
450
450
700
11
90
125
350
350
400
400
600
12
75
110
300
300
350
350
500
13
14
15
16
63
90
75
63
250
200
150
125
250
200
150
125
300
250
200
150
450
400
350
300
17
100
100
125
250
18
80
80
100
PVC
HDPE
Q$2,$AQ$3:$AQ$6,IF(C36=$AR$2,$AR$3:$AR$5,IF(C36=$AS$2,$AS$3:$AS$6,IF(C36=$AT$2,$AT$3:$AT$8,IF(C36=$AU$2,$AU$3:$AU$12,IF(C36=$AV$2,$AV$3:$AV$7,"NOT AVLBLE"))))))))
PUMPING MAIN TO HILL 2 ELSR

1 Natural Ground Level of the proposed 150 kl Sump at Hill No.2 in IT Park:
46.97 m
2 Proposed Ht of Centifugal pump
50.97 m
2 Low Ground Level of the proposed 150 kl Sump at Hill No.2 in IT Park:
3 Length of Pumping Main from the Proposed sump at Hill 2 to the ELSR on Hill 2
45.97 m
428.00 m
4 Natural Ground Level of the ELSR on Hill 2:
85.2 m
LVL
5 LWL of Existing ELSR on Hill No.2
95.7 m
LVL
6 MWL of Existing ELSR on Hill No.2:
100.7 m
LVL
7 Static Head : (MWL of ELSR LWL of Sump)
56.73 m
0.46
7.6 Q
8 Approximate dia
8 Loss of Head due to Friction
hf
9 Driving Head
10 Total Head:
=(1.1{[607980*Q1.81 ]/(d4.81) )} )
Total Hf
consider
60.00 m
215.43 mm
3.0 m/Km
1.27 m
2.00 m
200mm dia
Hence, the Head is considered as 100 m.60.00 m

11 Capacity of ELSR in Hill No.2: 225 KL
Total Demand of water per day
1380 KL
12 Hours for filling Proposed: 16 Hours( Considering as uninterrupted Power Supply)

13 Discharge per Hour
86250 LPH
14 Discharge per Minute
1437.5 LPM
Design the Pump for 720 LPM @ 62m head and one standby
15 Design of Pump
H.p=
QXrXh/4500Xn
for Centifugal pump consider efficienty is 65 %
16 Design of Pumping Main pipe line
Total Head = Pumping Head + Water Hammer Head

WHH
Total Head
say 7.5 HP
6.33 HP
and One standby
Water Hammer Cociffient X Q

94.282707
154.28 m
200mm dia of K-9 DI pipe
Distribution system
of Hill No 2
Data
MWL of OHSR
1 GL at OHSR
2 Highest GL in distrubution syst
3 Min assumed residual head
4 Frictinal losses in pipe line
hence staging of OHSR is
LWL
100.7
+ 85.2
87.2
3
2
mts
mts
mts
assume @2mt/KM
7.00
95.7
Max allowed frictional losses in distribution system is 3mts per km

Staging of OHSR
IS 3370 of 2009
Code for water retainng structures
Water retaining structures should be designed to uncracked sections and min M30
Water retaining structures should be designed sesmic zones and wind loads
Hf
=1.1{[607980*Q
1.81
]/(d
4.81)
)}
velocity
Height
MWL
5.00
=LWL+ht
100.70
=Q/A
QinLPM
A in Sqmt
=MWL-GL
Demand
Daily
along pipe Balance
demand
Slno
Pipe demand line
From To (in KL)
(in KL)
1
2
3
4
4A
5
1
R
1
690
690
0
2
1
2
690
460
230
3
1
3
230
120
110
4
1
4
120
120
0
Assume
d
losses(
%)
10%
6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
Hours of
supply of
deailey
demand
8 Hrs
7
14
14
14
16
Provide dia in
Approx
mm HDPE 80
Length dia in
demand in KM mm
CL 4kg/cm2
LPM
Nominal ID
8
9
10
11
12
821
0.15
172
160
160
548
0.60
140
110
110
143 1.165
72
90
90
125
0.45
67
75
75
TTL
Frictional losses
Per km
Total
13
14
3.15
0.47
9.18
5.51
2.12
2.47
4.00
1.80
Hydraulic gradient
level
Start
End
15
16
100.7 100.23
100.23
94.72
100.23
97.76
100.23
98.43
GL
Residual head
Start
End
Min
Max
17
18
21
22
85.2
86.5
13.73
18.73
86.5
87.2
7.52
12.52
86.5
84.7
13.06
18.06
84.0
76.0
22.43
27.43
Static
head
23
14.20
13.50
16.00
24.70
Type /
class of
pipe
24
HDPE 160
HDPE 110
HDPE 90
HDPE 90
Velocity
25
0.68
0.96
0.37
0.47
A in Sqmt
Remarks
26
Distribution system
of Hill No 2
Data
MWL of OHSR
1 GL at OHSR
2 Highest GL in distrubution syst
3 Min assumed residual head
4 Frictinal losses in pipe line
hence staging of OHSR is
LWL
Height
MWL
Demand
Daily
along pipe Balance
demand
Slno
Pipe demand line
From To (in KL)
(in KL)
1
2
3
4
4A
5
1
R
1
690
690
0
2
1
2
690
460
230
3
1
3
230
120
110
4
1
4
120
120
0
100.7
+ 85.2
87.2
3
2
5.00
=LWL+ht
Assume
d
losses(
%)
10%
6
0.1
0.1
0.1
0.1
mts
mts
mts
assume @2mt/KM
7.00
95.7
Max allowed frictional losses

Staging of OHSR
IS 3370 of 2009
Water retaining structures sh
Water retaining structures sh
100.70
Hours of
supply of
deailey
demand
8 Hrs
7
14
14
14
16
TTL
Length
demand in KM
LPM
8
9
821
0.15
548
0.60
143 1.165
125
0.45
Max allowed frictional losses in distribution system is 3mts per km

Staging of OHSR
IS 3370 of 2009
Code for water retainng structures
Water retaining structures should be designed to uncracked sections and min M30
Water retaining structures should be designed sesmic zones and wind loads
Hf
Provide dia in
mm HDPE 80
2
CL 4kg/cm
Nominal ID
10
11
12
172
160
160
140
110
110
72
90
90
67
75
75
Approx
dia in
mm
=1.1{[607980*Q1.81 ]/(d4.81) )}
Frictional losses
Per km
Total
13
14
3.15
0.47
9.18
5.51
2.12
2.47
4.00
1.80
Hydraulic gradient
level
Start
End
15
16
100.7 100.23
100.23
94.72
100.23
97.76
100.23
98.43
GL
Start
17
85.2
86.5
86.5
84.0
End
18
86.5
87.2
84.7
76.0
Residual head
Min
21
13.73
7.52
13.06
22.43
velocity
=Q/A
QinLPM
A in Sqmt
=MWL-GL
Static
head
Residual head
Max
22
18.73
12.52
18.06
27.43
23
14.20
13.50
16.00
24.70
Type /
class of
pipe
24
HDPE 160
HDPE 110
HDPE 90
HDPE 90
Velocity Remarks
25
0.68
0.96
0.37
0.47
26

Pumping Main Design

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Исходное описание:

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Pumping Main Design

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

ECONOMICAL PUMPING MAIN CALCULATIONS

From Sump at Hill to OHSR

Growth Rate( Percentage):

Design of Economic size of Pumping Main

Year of Comm (Initial)

Static Head for Pump

Hours of Pumping at end of 10yrs

Annual cost of electrical energy

Average hours of Pumping for avg discharge

Tot Cap cost

100 HDPE-8kg/sqcm 947.00

The Most Economical Pipe is

Frictional Head loss per

1st stage flow

Int dia of pipe

Total Head in mts

Int dia of pipe

1st stage of flow

2nd stage of flow

4kg/sqcm 4kg/sqcm Class-10

6kg/sqcm 6kg/sqcm Class-15

10kg/sqcm 8kg/sqcm Class-20

PUMPING MAIN TO HILL 2 ELSR

2 Proposed Ht of Centifugal pump

4 Natural Ground Level of the ELSR on Hill 2:

5 LWL of Existing ELSR on Hill No.2

6 MWL of Existing ELSR on Hill No.2:

7 Static Head : (MWL of ELSR LWL of Sump)

Hence, the Head is considered as 100 m.60.00 m

12 Hours for filling Proposed: 16 Hours( Considering as uninterrupted Power Supply)

14 Discharge per Minute

16 Design of Pumping Main pipe line

Total Head = Pumping Head + Water Hammer Head

Water Hammer Cociffient X Q

200mm dia of K-9 DI pipe

Max allowed frictional losses in distribution system is 3mts per km

Max allowed frictional losses

Max allowed frictional losses in distribution system is 3mts per km

Вам также может понравиться