Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Guiding Stars
of the
New Parenting
Movement
Volume 2
Edited & Published by Bob Collier
The Parental Intelligence Newsletter
www.parental-intelligence.com
3
Guiding Stars of the New Parenting Movement
Copyright 2006 Bob Collier, except where indicated otherwise. All rights reserved.
No part of this publication may be reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or
transmitted by any other means, electronic, mechanical, photocopying, recording or
otherwise, without prior written permission from the Editor and Publisher where
applicable, or from the individual contributor or contributors to this publication where
applicable.
Please contact the Editor and Publisher at bobcollier@parental-intelligence.com in the
first instance.
You are welcome to forward this book in its entirety to anyone you think may be
interested in reading it or ask them to visit www.parental-intelligence.com to download a
copy.
This book is free and has been compiled for information purposes only. The Editor and
Publisher is not responsible for any actions taken as a result of reading this book,
although he hopes and trusts that they will be exceedingly beneficial.
4
This book is dedicated to
My wife Mary, the mother of our two children, who has always been the rock solid
foundation of our happy family.
And to those wonderful children themselves, Bronnie and Pat, who, between them,
turned my life into a Fabulous Adventure and who have demonstrated to me before my
very eyes that magic happens when were allowed to be who we are.
5
Contents
PLEASE NOTE: You can go directly to any section of this e-book you choose to by using the Bookmarks
index. Please click on the Bookmarks tab to the left of the page to activate this option.
Introduction 7
The Guiding Stars
Aletha Solter 10
Raising Drug-Free Kids 11
The Disadvantages of Time-Out 13
Understanding Tears and Tantrums 18
Kim Wildner 23
Did you know? 24
Mother's Intention: How Belief Shapes Birth 27
Excerpt from Chapter 9: Agony or Ecstasy 28
HypnoBirthing 40
Fearless Birthing 41
Naomi Aldort 42
Raising Our Children, Raising Ourselves Reviews 43
Raising Our Children, Raising Ourselves Excerpts 45
John W. Travis 58
Meryn Callander 59
Why Men Leave: The Epidemic of Disappearing Dads 61
Becoming Mother: A Personal Journey 69
The Alliance for Transforming the Lives of Children 79
A Proclamation for Transforming the Lives of Children 80
aTLC Family Support Network WarmLine 86
John Breeding 87
True Nature and Great Misunderstandings 88
Remembering Essence: Parenting as Emotional Healing 89
Does ADHD Even Exist? The Ritalin Sham 97
Scott Noelle 103
The Art of Unconditionality 104
The Daily Groove 108
6
Beverley Paine 110
The Big Picture: Looking For The Perfect School 111
Overcoming Anxieties About Homeschooling 117
Everyone can Homeschool: Intelligence and Educational Knowledge isn't
a Prerequisite for Starting to Teach Your Children at Home 120
Looking back - what would I change? 121
What is Unschooling? 124
Alan Wilson 128
Parenting Potential 129
See the magnificence in kids
Working with energy
Value and respect
Acknowledge your fabulous progress
See through your child's eyes
Self care is critical
The relationship is the key
Kids sense your mood
The power of thought
Do something different
Tips for parents of young people
About the Editor 136
7
Introduction
Welcome to Volume 2 of Guiding Stars of the New Parenting Movement, the second in
an intended series of e-books showcasing the work of parenting, child development and
education specialists who I believe will add far more than most to every parents
understanding of both the special challenges and the potential joys of parenthood.
Have you read Guiding Stars of the New Parenting Movement Volume 1?
If not, please download a copy from here with my compliments.
Youll find in the Introduction to that inaugural volume of my e-book series the story of
why I was motivated to create my Guiding Stars project; so I wont repeat the story here.
By way of a very brief introduction to Volume 2, I do have a few thoughts Id like to share
with you; and then Ill introduce you, with pleasure, to the Guiding Stars who have
generously contributed their expertise to this book.
As youll probably be aware, my Guiding Stars project is a fairly recent development
from the Parental Intelligence newsletter Ive been publishing for a little over four years.
My newsletter, to tell you the truth, was originally intended to be a vehicle for other
interests of a far more commercial nature; however, those other interests seem to have
long since fallen by the wayside as Ive become increasingly aware of and more and more
fascinated by what I perceive to be higher ideals and opportunities.
Parental Intelligence in itself, meanwhile - represented now by both the newsletter and
its website has grown into a significant and very important feature of my personal life.
In many ways, its become my official presence on the internet.
In terms of the impact of my online adventures on my experiences in the real world -
the world of my relationships with my wife and my own children, of looking after our
cats and greeting the neighbours as I walk down my street, to name but a few of its
aspects - the regular activity of compiling a newsletter on the subject of parenting for
publication on the world wide web has brought me into contact with a far wider range of
parenting ideas, models and stories than I would ever be likely to encounter as I go about
my normal business.
So, I would have to say that, more than anything else, my life as the publisher of a
parenting newsletter, if I can put it in those words, has turned out to be a tremendous
learning experience.
A major and very pleasing part of that learning experience has been the realisation that
there are substantial numbers of people in the world at large whose perception of the
nature and role of parenting is far closer to my own than the 'conventional wisdom' of
which I'm so entirely skeptical.
8
It truly has been a pleasure and a privilege to meet (in the internet sense of that word)
so many bright minds.
Thus, I would simply like to acknowledge, as a prelude to Guiding Stars of the New
Parenting Movement Volume 2, that Im very proud to be a part of the process of
communicating the expertise and work of the people featured in this and other e-books
in my Guiding Stars series to ever more parents. I look forward to continuing to be of
whatever help I can be in that respect in the years ahead.
And, now, please read on and meet the Guiding Stars of Volume 2.
Thank you for reading this book. I hope youll find something in its pages that will add to
your life and, through you, to the lives of your children.
In fact, I know you will.
Bob Collier
Canberra, Australia
December, 2006
9
The Guiding Stars
10
Aletha Solter
Aletha Solter is a Swiss/American developmental psychologist, who is recognized
internationally as an expert on attachment, trauma, and non-punitive discipline. She
studied with the Swiss psychologist, Jean Piaget, at the University of Geneva,
Switzerland, where she obtained a Master's degree in human biology in 1969. She then
earned a Ph.D. in psychology from the University of California at Santa Barbara in 1975,
after which she taught psychology at the University of California and conducted research
for a few years.
When her first child was born in 1977 (following a traumatic birth) she did not find any
parenting books that advocated attachment-style parenting and non-punitive discipline
while taking into account the impact of stress and trauma on children's development.
The first book she wrote, The Aware Baby (first published in 1984, revised in 2001), is
the one that she wished she had had as a new mother. The Aware Baby has sold over
100,000 copies worldwide. Its sequel, Helping Young Children Flourish, describes this
same approach, covering the age range from two to eight years. Her third book is Tears
and Tantrums. Her fourth book, Raising Drug-Free Kids, was published in September
2006.
Her books have been translated into several languages, and she has also written
workbooks to accompany her first two, as well as numerous articles for parents and
professionals.
Dr. Solter has been working with parents, children, and professionals since 1978 as a
workshop leader and consultant. In 1990 she founded The Aware Parenting Institute to
help promote the philosophy of empathy and respect described in her books. The
Institute now has certified instructors in many countries. She has given talks and led
workshops for parents and professionals in ten different countries, and has appeared on
TV in the United States, Europe, and Asia. Her goal is to help create a non-violent world
in which all children are allowed to attain their full potential. She knows that parenting is
a difficult job, and that parents deserve recognition, information, and support.
Dr. Solter lives in Goleta, California, and is available for talks, workshops, and
consultations (by phone or in person). She can be contacted by e-mail
(solter@awareparenting.com) or by phone at (805) 968-1868.
Please note that she does not have the time to answer the numerous personal e-mail
queries that she receives from parents around the world. Please click here for
information about her consultations and fees, or go to her Parent Support Page.
Copyright 2006 by Aletha Solter
11
Raising Drug-Free Kids
by Aletha Solter, Ph.D.
Adding to the successful series of Raising titles from Da Capo Press, Raising Drug-Free
Kids gives parents 100 tips for keeping children of all ages away from drugs and alcohol.
With adolescent use of illegal substances on the rise, parents are wise to be concerned
about setting their children on a drug-free course. While much advice handed out these
days focuses on teen behavior and on what to do once drugs have become a problem in
the home, Raising Drug-Free Kids takes an innovative approach and focuses instead on
preventive measures that can be followed at all stages and ages of a child's life.
In this essential, practical, and comprehensive parenting guide, developmental
psychologist and parent educator, Aletha Solter, provides parents with simple, easy-to-
use tools to build a solid foundation for children to say "no" to drugs. Organized by age
group, from preschool through young adulthood, the handy 100 tips will show parents
how to help their children to:
Feel good about themselves without an artificial high.
Cope with stress so they won't turn to drugs to relax.
Respect their bodies so they will reject harmful substances.
Have close family connections so they won't feel desperate to belong to a group.
Take healthy risks (like outdoor adventures) so they won't need to take dangerous
ones.
Endorsements
Raising Drug-Free Kids provides worried parents with a wide range of practical and
helpful strategies to create a healthy environment for kids of all ages that will serve to
immunize them against the temptations of illegal drug use for the rest of their lives. This
holistic approach to drug prevention is a welcome relief from the simplistic 'just say no to
drugs, but ask your doctor if Ritalin is right for you' message that abounds in our culture.
I recommend this book highly.
Thomas Armstrong, Ph.D. (author of The Myth of the A.D.D. Child: 50 Ways to Improve
Your Child's Behavior and Attention Span without Drugs, Labels, or Coercion)
Dr. Solter knows the answer to our drug problem, and she provides it in clear, doable
fashion. Teaching our kids to 'just say no' isn't enough, and punitive discipline only
worsens the problem. The answer is to nurture our children, to give them the skills they
need to succeed, and to raise them to be strong, healthy people who have no interest in
making drugs a part of their lives. To find out how, read this very important, accessible,
inspiring book. Every parent, teacher, and friend of a child of any age will find something
of practical interest within its pages.
Karen Miles (author of The Power of Loving Discipline)
Copyright 2006 by Aletha Solter
12
Excerpt from the Introduction to Raising Drug-Free Kids
The approach described in this book may be quite different from other parenting advice
you have heard. Many books suggest that children need more "discipline," meaning that
parents should punish their children for breaking rules. However, strict authoritarian
control often backfires by causing children to rebel. Although some children may benefit
from more consistency and structure (but not punishment), the root cause of most
behavioral problems, including substance abuse, is not a lack of discipline but rather a
lack of connection. Children who lack a close relationship with at least one loving parent
are at risk for substance abuse, no matter how much "discipline" you impose on them.
Likewise, children who have a close relationship with a loving parent are more likely to
resist drugs.
The one hundred tips in this book will show you how to establish and maintain a close
connection to your child at each stage of your child's development. It is never too late to
improve your relationship with your child. At the root of this approach is spending time
with your child, using a nonpunitive approach to discipline, and accepting your child's
emotions.
Copyright 2006 by Aletha Solter
For more information about Raising Drug-Free Kids, please visit the Da Capo Press
website.
13
The Disadvantages of Time-Out
by Aletha Solter, Ph.D.
(Originally published in Mothering Magazine, Fall 1992. Revised and updated in 2000.)
As concerned parents and educators have become aware of the dangers of physical
punishment, time-out has emerged as a popular disciplinary tool. Misbehaving children
are told to sit quietly on a chair or go to their rooms to calm down and think about what
they did. After a period of time, they are allowed to come back to the group or join the
family, provided that they act appropriately. The designated period of time is usually
one minute per year of age, and children who leave the chair or room before their time is
up are told to return for the full allotment once again. Some books recommend an added
rule of silence, and suggest that the timing be repeated if the silence is broken. In either
case, parents who use this method are promised quick and easy results.
Time-out stems from the behaviorist movement based on the work of psychologist B.F.
Skinner. His theory of operant conditioning asserts that children will behave in certain
ways if they receive rewards for doing so (positive reinforcement), and that undesirable
behavior can be diminished by withholding the rewards or by invoking pain (both of
which are termed punishment). Skinner himself believed that all forms of punishment
were unsuitable means of controlling childrens behavior.(1) Even so, while spanking is
on the wane in the United States, the withholding of love and attention has persisted as
an acceptable means of control.
Beneath the Surface
Using time-out appears less injurious than hitting, spanking, or yelling, because it does
not involve physical or verbal abuse. It is therefore thought to represent some degree of
progress in our continual striving to make this world a better place for children.
According to many educators and psychologists, however, time-out is not as innocent as
it seems and is, moreover, an emotionally harmful way to discipline children. In fact, the
National Association for the Education of Young Children includes the use of time-out in
a list of harmful disciplinary measures, along with physical punishment, criticizing,
blaming, and shaming.(2)
Beneath the surface, time-out is an authoritarian approach and, as such, can work only
among children trained to comply with the power and authority of adults. Children
trained to conform to such measures know that the consequences of disobeying are
worse than adhering to the injunctions. Children who have not been brought up in an
authoritarian environment will most likely refuse to go to another room or sit in a chair.
How does a child learn about the consequences of disobedience? Proponents of time-out
advise parents to remove all privileges such as TV, toys, music, and so forth until
compliance has been achieved. Always there is the threat of deprivation or further
penalty. In some families there may even be an unspoken threat of violence. Although
the method seems innocent enough, it requires a past history of punitive
authoritarianism to produce children docile enough to obey.
Copyright 1992, 2000 by Aletha Solter
14
Proponents claim that time-out is not a form of punishment. They use terms such as
consequence, renewal time, or down time to make the approach sound benign. The
term time-out itself has pleasant connotations of a sports team taking a well-deserved
break. Regrettably, this non-threatening terminology has deluded parents into thinking
that the approach is harmless.
From a childs point of view, time-out is definitely experienced as punishment. Who
wants to be isolated from the group and totally ignored? It is quite likely that children
view this form of isolation as abandonment and loss of love. And while parents are often
careful to provide reassurances of their love and to distinguish between the child and the
unruly behavior (I love you, but you need to go to your room for five minutes because
what you did is not acceptable), their actions speak much louder than their words.
Children under the age of seven simply do not have the capability to process words in the
same way that adults do.(3) Concrete experience and perceptions of reality impact more
strongly than language. Being isolated and ignored is interpreted as Nobody wants to be
with me right now. Therefore I must be bad and unlovable, and no loving words,
however well intended, can override this feeling of rejection.
Nothing is more frightening for a child than the withdrawal of love. Along with the fear
come insecurity, anxiety, confusion, anger, resentment, and low self-esteem. Time-out
can also cause embarrassment and humiliation, especially when used in the presence of
other children. In the childs realm of experience, time-out is nothing short of punitive.
Painful feelings are one consideration; the information conveyed about human
relationships is another. What message are we giving our children in demonstrating that
love and attention are commodities to be doled out or withheld for purposes of
controlling others? Is this a conflict-resolution skill that will be useful to them? How will
it influence their ability to interact with friends, and some day with a spouse and
coworkers? Wouldnt it be better to teach children useful conflict-resolution skills right
from the start, rather than convey the message that the only way to solve conflicts is to
cut off communication?
Although the trouble with time-out is in large part invisible, one aspect is glaringly
obvious: at some point it stops working. Proponents of the approach admit that it is
effective only up until the age of about nine. Can you imagine telling your teenager, who
may be taller than you, to sit in a chair while you ignore him? Teens who have any sense
of their own self-worth will laugh at such a command. The adolescent version of time-out
is the practice of grounding teenagers by not allowing them to go out on the weekends
or in the evenings. But this method only leads to resentment, resistance, and deceit.
Indeed, any method based on power and authoritarianism must eventually be
abandoned, simply because parents run out of power.(4) Parents of teens face an entirely
new set of difficulties when their tried-and-true methods of control prove utterly
ineffective. Parents who adopt non-authoritarian methods right from the start, on the
other hand, are able to prevent the power struggles, as well as the discipline problems,
that so often come with adolescence.
Copyright 1992, 2000 by Aletha Solter
15
Hidden Consequences
The use of time-out leads to a host of hidden problems. For one, when we enforce a time-
out for children who are crying or raging, they get the message that we do not want to be
around them when they are upset. Certain that we will not listen, they may soon stop
bringing their problems to us.
Furthermore, such children may learn to suppress their feelings, especially if we insist on
time-out in silence. Have we forgotten that crying and raging are healthy tension-release
mechanisms that help relieve sadness and frustration?(5)(6)(7) Have we ignored the
research showing that stress hormones are excreted through tears, thereby possibly
reducing the effects of stress and restoring the bodys chemical balance?.(8) In teaching
our children to suppress their tears, we may actually be increasing their susceptibility to
a variety of emotional and physical imbalances. Swiss psychotherapist Dr. Alice Miller
states that one of the most devastating things we do to children is deny them the freedom
to express their anger and suffering.(9)
An additional problem is that the use of time-out does not address the underlying cause
of the inappropriate behavior. Children act in specific ways for good reasons, even
though the youngsters themselves may not be aware of them. Most undesirable behavior
can be explained by one of three factors: the child is attempting to fulfill a legitimate
need, the child lacks information or is too young to understand, or the child is feeling
upset (frustrated, sad, scared, confused, jealous, or insecure).(10) When we try to change
a behavior without addressing these feelings and needs, we do not help our children very
much at all. Why? Because the underlying problem will still be there. Teaching children
to conform to our wishes does not resolve the deeper issues.
For example, siblings who are repeatedly separated and sent to their rooms when they
fight may eventually learn to stop fighting in front of their parents. Their unresolved
feelings of jealousy and hatred, however, may come to expression in more devious ways,
or they may carry their resentments into adulthood. Curtailing the symptoms of a
problem does not solve the problem.
Parents have been led to believe that children will use time-out to think about what they
did and regain some modicum of self-control. In reality, when children act in
inappropriate, aggressive, or obnoxious ways, they are often harboring such strong pent-
up feelings that they are unable to think clearly about their actions. Far more helpful
than isolation is an attentive listener who can encourage the expression of honest
feelings. The healthy release provided by talking, crying, or raging may even prevent the
recurrence of unwanted behavior.
Holding children who hit or bite is much more effective than isolating them. Firm but
loving holding creates safety and warmth while protecting other children from getting
hurt. It also invites the expression of genuine feelings (through crying and raging) while
reassuring the child of the indestructible parent-child bond.(10) It is paradoxical, yet true:
children are most in need of loving attention when they act least deserving of it. Telling
a violent child to sit quietly rarely accomplishes anything constructive and only further
contributes to the childs pent-up anger and feelings of alienation.
It is not necessary to isolate children and withdraw our love to teach them how to
behave. In fact, it is entirely possible to help children learn to be cooperative and
Copyright 1992, 2000 by Aletha Solter
16
decent members of society without ever issuing punishments, rewards, or artificial
consequences of any kind. No quick and easy method will solve every conflict. Instead,
we need to treat each situation as the unique challenge that it is, and try to be flexible
and creative, all the while giving our children the love and respect they deserve.
NOTES
1. Robert D. Nye, B.F. Skinner and Radical Behaviorism, Three Views of Man
(Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company, Inc., 1975), p. 51
2. Avoiding Me Against You Discipline, Young Children, Vol. 44, No. 1. (Washington
DC: National Association for the Education of Young Children, November 1988), p.
27.
3. Jerome S. Bruner, The Course of Cognitive Growth, American Psychologist 19
(1964), pp. 1-15.
4. Thomas Gordon, Parent Effectiveness Training (Three Rivers Press, 2000), pp. 193-
194.
5. Aletha J. Solter, The Aware Baby (Goleta, CA: Shining Star Press, 2001), pp. 39-41.
6. Aletha J. Solter, Helping Young Children Flourish (Goleta, CA: Shining Star Press,
1989), pp. 5-9.
7. Aletha J. Solter, Tears and Tantrums (Goleta, CA: Shining Star Press, 1998), pp. 13-
32.
8. William H. Frey II, and Muriel Langseth, Crying: the Mystery of Tears, (Minneapolis:
Winston Press, 1985), pp. 45-58.
9. Alice Miller, For Your Own Good: Hidden Cruelty in Child-Rearing and the Roots of
Violence, (New York: Farrar, Straus, Giroux), pp. 106, 259.
10. Martha G. Welch, Holding Time (New York: Simon and Schuster, Inc., 1988), pp. 42-
43.
Copyright 1992, 2000 by Aletha Solter. All rights reserved. No part of this article may
be reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical
(including copying to other web sites, and including translations), without written
permission from Aletha Solter.
Aletha Solter, PhD, is a developmental psychologist, international speaker, consultant,
and founder of the Aware Parenting Institute (www.awareparenting.com). Her three
books, The Aware Baby, Helping Young Children Flourish and Tears and Tantrums
have been translated into many languages, and she is recognized internationally as an
expert on attachment, trauma, and non-punitive discipline. She lives in California, and
17
has two grown children and one grandchild. Her fourth book, Raising Drug-Free Kids,
was published in September 2006.
Aware Parenting is a philosophy of child-rearing that has the potential to change the
world. Based on cutting-edge research and insights in child development, Aware
Parenting questions most traditional assumptions about raising children, and proposes a
new approach that can profoundly shift a parents relationship with his or her child.
Parents who follow this approach raise children who are bright, compassionate,
competent, non-violent, and drug-free.
Warning/Disclaimer: The information in this article is not intended to be used as a
substitute for medical advice or treatment. When children display emotional, behavioral,
or medical problems of any kind, parents are strongly advised to seek competent medical
advice and treatment. Aletha Solter, The Aware Parenting Institute, and Shining Star
Press shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to
any damage caused, or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly by the information
contained in this article.
Copyright 1992, 2000 by Aletha Solter
18
Understanding Tears and Tantrums
by Aletha Solter, Ph.D.
Confusion about crying
Many parents find it hard to understand and accept their childrens tears and tantrums,
and are confused by contradictory advice they have read. On one hand, much of the
advice in parenting books is based on the assumption that crying and temper tantrums
are behaviors that should be discouraged. Some people assume that these are indications
of a spoiled child who is used to getting her own way, while others think of them more
as immature behaviors that children must learn to control. It is generally believed that as
soon as children are old enough to talk, the job of parents is to help them express their
wants and feelings using words rather than tears or outbursts of rage. Even people who
recognize crying as a sign of stress and frustration sometimes consider crying to be an
unnecessary byproduct of stress. They assume that children will feel better once they
stop crying. This belief may lead to efforts to distract children from their crying.
On the other hand, there is an increasing tendency to regard crying as a beneficial
expression of feelings that has therapeutic value. Many therapists encourage children to
cry, especially in situations involving loss. Therapists assume that crying is an important
and necessary part of the grieving and recovery process. John Bowlby, the father of
attachment theory, pointed out that failure to accept a childs painful emotions can have
negative consequences. He claimed that children should be allowed to express their grief
openly by crying during situations of separation or loss. He also felt that children should
be allowed to express anger at their parents. The result of all this contradictory advice is
that parents often wonder what to do when children cry or rage. Should they comfort,
ignore, distract, punish, give in or listen empathically?
In my three books: The Aware Baby, Helping Young Children Flourish, and Tears and
Tantrums, I propose a stress-release theory of crying, and I recommend an accepting
and nurturing attitude towards all crying in infants and young children (assuming all
immediate needs have been met). Considerable evidence, accumulated from several
different sources, indicates that crying is an important and beneficial physiological
process that helps children cope with stress.
What does research tell us about crying?
Dr. William Frey, a biochemist in Minnesota, has researched the chemical content of
human tears. One of the substances found in tears was the stress hormone ACTH. Thus it
is possible that shedding tears helps to reduce excessive amounts of ACTH and/or other
substances that accumulate following a stressful event. Dr. Frey has suggested that the
purpose of emotional crying may be to remove waste products from the body, similar to
other excretory processes such as urinating, defecating, exhaling, and sweating. Freys
conclusion is that we may increase our susceptibility to a variety of physical and
psychological problems when we suppress our tears. Crying not only removes toxins
from the body but also reduces tension. Studies on adults in psychotherapy have found
lower blood pressure, pulse rate, and body temperature in patients immediately
Copyright 2000 by Aletha Solter
19
following therapy sessions during which they cried and raged. Similar changes were not
observed in a control group of people who merely exercised for an equivalent period of
time.
Researchers have looked at the relationship between crying and physical health. Studies
have found that healthy people cry more and have a more positive attitude about crying
than do people who suffer from ulcers or colitis. Other studies have shown that therapy
involving high levels of crying leads to significant psychological improvement. Those
patients who did not express their feelings in this manner during therapy tended not to
improve, while those patients who did frequently cry in therapy experienced changes for
the better.
There is typically increased crying and tantrums in children for many weeks following
catastrophes such as a hurricane, indicating that the children are attempting to release
their terror and other strong emotions. Psychologists have studied crying in children
during the highly stressful experience of a long hospitalization. Children who protested
openly by crying and screaming at the beginning of their hospital stay showed better
adjustment than the ones who were good patients right from the start. The latter
appeared to be calm and cooperative, but were more likely to show signs of stress later
on, such as regression to infantile modes of behavior, eating or sleeping difficulties, and
learning disorders.
These different areas of research all indicate that crying is a healing mechanism that
allows people to cope with stress and trauma. Crying can be considered a natural repair
kit with which every child is born. People of all ages cry because they need to, not
because they are spoiled or immature.
Why do young children need to cry?
Children cry spontaneously after having experienced any kind of stress or trauma. The
more stress there is in a childs life, the greater will be the need to cry. There are many
sources of stress in young childrens lives. Illnesses, injuries, and hospitalization are
cause for pain, confusion, and anxiety. Quarreling, separation, or divorce of a childs
parents can be confusing and terrifying, as can the presence of a parents new partner or
a stepparent. Childrens growing awareness of violence, death, and war can be sources of
fear and confusion. Stress can result from a move to a new home, starting a new school,
or the birth of a sibling.
Added to these major life stresses are all the daily separations, accidents, frustrations,
disappointments, and anxieties. In a single morning at nursery school, a child can have a
toy grabbed from him by another child, fall from a swing, be served a snack that he
dislikes, spill paint on his new shoes, and have to wait for a late parent after all the other
children have left. Even happy occasions can be stressful if they are overstimulating. It is
not uncommon for young children to burst into tears during their own birthday party, for
example. As if this werent enough stress to worry about, many children also carry the
burden of very early experiences of stress or trauma, such as that caused prenatally or
during the birth process. Research has shown that babies who had medical
complications during birth cry more than those who were less stressed.
While much of childrens stress is an inevitable part of life, parents can reduce their
childrens stress level (and therefore the need to cry) by providing a sensitive, accepting,
Copyright 2000 by Aletha Solter
20
child-friendly environment that recognizes childrens needs. Non-authoritarian
approaches to discipline are much less stressful for children, and also more effective,
than the use of punishment. Finally, the entire family will benefit when parents look for
ways to reduce stress in their own lives.
The Broken Cookie phenomenon.
The need to cry gradually builds up until the child feels an urge for release. At that point,
almost anything will trigger the tears. Because of this, there are times when the reason
for the childs crying is not immediately evident, and the outburst appears to be
unjustified by the current situation. For example, a little girls cookie breaks and she
throws herself into a crying fit. Moments like these can be extremely exasperating for
parents, but is the child really spoiled and manipulative as some people would claim?
There is another way of looking at the situation. When a child acts in this manner, she
may be using the pretext of the broken cookie to release pent-up feelings of grief or anger
resulting from an accumulation of stress and anxiety. Children do not cry indefinitely.
They stop of their own accord when they are finished. After crying, there is a usually a
feeling of relief and wellbeing. The incident that triggered the crying is no longer an
issue, and the child usually becomes happy and cooperative.
Children do need to learn that loud crying is unacceptable at certain times and places,
just as they must learn to use the toilet. However, all children, no matter what age, need
at least one adult in their lives who can provide a safe time and place to listen to their
emotions of grief or anger. If this kind of acceptance is provided in the home, it will be
easier for children to refrain from crying in school or in public situations, and they will
save up their crying for their safe home base.
Why is it so hard to accept childrens tears?
It is difficult to allow children the freedom of tears because most of us were stopped from
crying when we were young. Our well-meaning, but misinformed, parents may have
distracted, scolded, punished, or ignored us when we attempted to heal our childhood
hurts by crying. Some of us were stopped kindly: There, there, dont cry, while others
were stopped less kindly: If you dont stop crying, Ill give you something to cry about!
Many people were praised for not crying. However it may have been communicated,
most people received the message that crying was unacceptable. Because of this early
conditioning, many adults have learned to suppress their own tears. This makes it hard
for them to empathize with a crying child, and results in a strong urge to stop the child
from crying, just as their parents did with them.
In our culture, crying is even less acceptable for boys than for girls. Parents tend to be
less tolerant of crying in boys, perhaps because of a fear that their sons will be un-
masculine. Big boys dont cry is a commonly heard expression. The consequence of this
is that some men have not shed a tear in years. This suppression of crying in men may be
partly responsible for the fact that men are more prone than women to stress-related
illnesses and die at an earlier age. It could also help explain why more men than women
commit violent acts. When painful emotions are repeatedly repressed, they can become
distorted and show up later as violence towards others.
Copyright 2000 by Aletha Solter
21
Parents naturally want their children to be happy, and feel it is their job to make their
children happy, often failing to realize that happiness will return spontaneously after the
crying outburst has run its course. Many parents quickly lose confidence and feel they
are incompetent when their children cry. It helps to remember that when children cry,
the hurt has usually already happened. Crying is not the hurt, but the process of
becoming unhurt. A childs tears or tantrums are not an indication of an incompetent
parent. On the contrary, crying indicates that the child feels safe enough to bring up
painful feelings, and is not afraid of being rejected.
How can parents respond helpfully to childrens tears and tantrums?
First of all, parents can take preventive measures by attempting to reduce frustrations,
disappointments, and overstimulation. It is a well-known fact that a tired or hungry child
has a lower tolerance level for frustration. Some children are more sensitive than others
and are easily upset by overstimulation or changes in routine. A calm and predictable
environment with gentle transitions can be reassuring to children who become easily
overwhelmed.
While it is important to keep stress at a minimum in childrens lives, it is just as
important to resist the urge to make things better, if this implies distracting children
from their feelings. If a child cries when her favorite toy breaks, it is tempting to say,
Dont cry. Well buy another one. A more helpful response is to show loving sympathy
and reflect her feelings, for example, Youre really sad about that. Although this may
temporarily make the crying louder, it will help the child feel understood and will give
her the necessary permission to express her feeling of loss. When a child is physically
hurt it is important to acknowledge the pain (I see that your scraped knee really hurts)
rather than deny it or distract the childs attention away from it. Parents can also
recognize the emotions such as fear or anger that often accompany an accident: Was it
scary falling off the swing?
Even when the crying or raging seems to be out of proportion to the incident that
triggered it, the child benefits when he is allowed to express himself. Perhaps the spilled
milk at dinnertime is a pretext for him to release an entire day of accumulated
frustrations or disappointments. The most helpful response is simply to allow the crying
or tantrum to occur, even though this may require a tremendous amount of patience. If
the crying is disruptive, the child can be taken to another room, provided an adult stays
with him to offer loving support. No person of any age should be forced to cry alone. It is
especially important that children never feel they are being punished for crying.
If the child acts violently towards others while raging, it is important to stop the hurtful
behavior. The child can be told that he must not hit another person, but he may hit a
pillow. If verbal instructions to stop hitting are not effective, an adult may need to step in
and provide gentle restraint, saying, I need to keep everyone safe. I see you are very
angry. I cannot let you hurt anyone, but its okay to scream and cry. The goal is to stop
the violence while encouraging a healing release of emotions. Children who hit or bite
are often close to tears but do not feel safe enough to cry. Close and loving holding that
interrupts the hurtful behavior can allow the child to begin crying, which is precisely
what he needed to do in the first place. A child who has been allowed to cry loudly and
freely within the safe boundaries of his parents arms will then be less prone to violent or
destructive behavior.
Copyright 2000 by Aletha Solter
22
To conclude, tears and tantrums are built-in healing mechanisms that help children
overcome the effects of stress and trauma. Acceptance of strong emotions is an essential
ingredient in unconditional love and healthy attachment. Children need an environment
that permits them to cry without being distracted, ridiculed, or punished. This will allow
them to maintain emotional health by regularly freeing themselves from the effects of
frustrating, frightening, or confusing experiences. An additional advantage of this
approach is that, when parents strive to accept and listen to their childrens strong
emotions, the children will grow up knowing that they can always come to their parents
with their problems, and that they will be loved no matter how sad, frightened, or angry
they feel.
Copyright 2000 by Aletha Solter. All rights reserved. No part of this article may be
reproduced or transmitted in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical
(including copying to other web sites, and including translations), without written
permission from Aletha Solter.
Aletha Solter, PhD, is a developmental psychologist, international speaker, consultant,
and founder of the Aware Parenting Institute (www.awareparenting.com). Her three
books, The Aware Baby, Helping Young Children Flourish and Tears and Tantrums
have been translated into many languages, and she is recognized internationally as an
expert on attachment, trauma, and non-punitive discipline. She lives in California, and
has two grown children and one grandchild. Her fourth book, Raising Drug-Free Kids,
was published in September 2006.
Aware Parenting is a philosophy of child-rearing that has the potential to change the
world. Based on cutting-edge research and insights in child development, Aware
Parenting questions most traditional assumptions about raising children, and proposes a
new approach that can profoundly shift a parents relationship with his or her child.
Parents who follow this approach raise children who are bright, compassionate,
competent, non-violent, and drug-free.
Warning/Disclaimer: The information in this article is not intended to be used as a
substitute for medical advice or treatment. When children display emotional, behavioral,
or medical problems of any kind, parents are strongly advised to seek competent medical
advice and treatment. Aletha Solter, The Aware Parenting Institute, and Shining Star
Press shall have neither liability nor responsibility to any person or entity with respect to
any damage caused, or alleged to be caused, directly or indirectly by the information
contained in this article.
The Aware Parenting Institute
www.awareparenting.com
23
Kim Wildner
My name is Kim Wildner. I have been a childbirth professional for 15 years. I am
certified through the Association of Labor Assistants and Childbirth Educators and the
HypnoBirthing Institute. My hypnosis training was through the Institute for
Transformational Hypnotherapy, which is licensed by the Michigan State Board of
Education. I was certified in 2001.
I began my journey to helping mothers find empowerment through birthing joyously
after my own ecstatic birth in 1991. Toward that end, I passed the exam for entry level
midwifery through the North American Registry of Midwives in 1994. This was only the
beginning of the journey thats led me to where I am today.
I am the author of Mothers Intention: How Belief Shapes Birth and have been published
in numerous professional journals.
See my full resume and press kit.
I have been married to the same man for 21 years and we have one beautiful, gently,
naturally born daughter.
Copyright Kim Wildner
Visit Kim Wildners website at www.kimwildner.com
24
Did you know?
by Kim Wildner
From the website Womans Wisdom
[Sources for the information shared here can be found in Mother's Intention: How Belief Shapes
Birth Ample links and a suggested reading list are also provided for those seeking verification for
the delcarations made on this page. I encourage further exploration into this matter. You'll be
surprised at what you find. Never blindly believe anyone, including me.]
There are 19 industrialized nations with lower cesarean rates than the US. There are 22
countries with lower infant mortality rates (death rates for babies) than the US. In 100%
of those countries with lower infant mortality rates, midwives are the principal birth
attendants. In fact, in most births around the world, a doctor is not even in the room at
the time of birth.
As if that isn't sobering enough, in Reclaiming Our Health, by John Robbins there are
several examples of the mounting evidence supporting the safety of home birth and
midwives for healthy women. For instance, in an experiment in California, midwives
undertook the management of the majority of births. The reduction of the neonatal death
rate to half of what it had been when the obstetricians were managing births caused the
California Medical Association to oppose the program, resulting in it's termination. Once
obstetricians resumed control of the births, the neonatal death rate tripled within two
and a half years. This example is confined to California, but the results are consistent
with similar data from around the world. For more documented examples, click here for
suggested reading.
Obstetrics could never be replaced by midwifery, just as midwifery should have never
been nearly eradicated by obstetrics. Not all women should give birth at home.
Midwifery specializes in normal birth, and obstetrics is a surgical specialty for abnormal
situations. Technology in and of itself is not bad. It can be likened to fire. Both are tools.
Used appropriately, fire can keep us warm and cook our food. Inappropriate use can
cause property damage and deadly burns.
As a Certified Childbirth Educator it is my job to help parents distinguish for themselves
if they have chosen a caregiver who respects technology and uses it appropriately. In
other words, they learn how to become smart consumers. I try to help both home and
hospital couples examine all they've been told...rejecting what insults their soul. To that
end, my curriculum meets the needs of a wide variety of parents. All parents want the
best for their baby, regardless of where they have chosen to birth or with whom. I
support the right to choose. It is my job to see to it that the parents who seek my services
have the tools that they need to make informed choices relevant to their particular
situation. A choice made in ignorance is no choice at all.
The ideal partnership that produces the healthiest babies and lowest death rates is
complementary care. Elsewhere in the world, all healthy women see midwives for their
prenatal care. When and if complications occur, a highly skilled obstetrician is consulted.
This system also utilizes Universal Health Care to reduce the possibility of inappropriate
Copyright Kim Wildner
25
use of technology. Medically indicated use of tests and procedures is paid for, as are
midwifery services, but use of physicians or intervention in the absence of medical
indication must be paid for by the parents out of pocket. The result is less abuse of
technology as well as lower death and injury rates for moms and babies. Where midwives
and doctors work together, everyone wins.
Consider the Following
There are a couple of myths that perpetuate the fear that our culture has of birth, which
is ultimately what keeps women from making safer decisions regarding maternity care.
Myth #1. Birth moved from home to hospital because hospital was safer.
Not only is this false, but had midwifery and home birth continued to be the norm along
with the factors that actually did improve outcomes (better nutrition, sanitation, birth
control availability and the discovery of antibiotics), maternal and infant mortality
(death) and morbidity (injury) would actually have declined further!
The reality is that birth moved into the hospital by far more sinister intent. For hundreds
of years, midwives were burned at the stake as witches for having knowledge of herbs
and healing. The history of the witch burnings is too vast to do more than touch on it
here, but suffice it to say that the persecution continues to this day. Granted, it has
changed form. Women are no longer burned for practicing midwifery. But make no
mistake...the medical profession is still trying to denigrate the profession of midwifery by
scandalous means. The lives of countless midwives in the service of women have been
ruined by harrassment. For the story of the last one hundred years in the United States,
see the portion of the College of Midwives website titled The Official Plan to Eliminate
the Midwife.
Fortunately, with the advent of the information age, the truth about midwifery is coming
to the fore and can no longer be suppressed. Knowledgeable doctors in support of
midwifery and homebirth are forming groups, such as Physicians for Midwifery.
Consumer advocacy groups like Citizens for Midwifery are growing. Women are asking
questions.
Myth #2 Birth is a dangerous medical condition.
False. Birth is a normal, physiological event. The campaign of lies and misrepresentation
referred to in myth number one has led to generations of women being terrified of birth.
Let's get some perspective.
Are you afraid to ride in a car? If you are a woman between the age of 14 and 34
(childbearing age, more or less)the rate of death by car accident is 20 per 100,000. The
rate of death for vaginal birth is 6 per 100,000. Although the rate of death is more than
three times higher than for giving birth, we don't restrict ourselves to clear fluids before
getting in the car for a trip to the store, nor do we expect to have an IV set up for each car
trip...both standard interventions for birth.
Now that you have a clearer picture of how safe birth is, contrast this with the 24%
chance that if you give birth with a physician in the hospital, you will have a cesarean
section (forget for a moment that the World Health Organization recommends no more
Copyright Kim Wildner
26
than a 12-15% cesarean rate because when the rate rises higher than that, more babies
actually die than are saved by the procedure).
Let's take the comparison in a different direction. Let's compare some numbers with
something that is in our awareness quite often. Breast cancer. 1 in 10 women will get
breast cancer. More than 1 in 4 women will have a cesarean.
We have breast cancer awareness month. We have celebrity fund raisers to find a cure
for breast cancer. We have public awareness messages about checking our breasts,
urging sisters, mothers and buddies to have mammograms and information on how to
reduce our chances of contracting breast cancer. Something about breast cancer is on the
news almost weekly. Quite rightly so. It's a wonderful cause. But who is helping us learn
how to avoid unnecessary cesareans? Why are we under the impression, as a culture, that
a cesarean is just another way to have a baby? How is it that a life saving procedure for
extreme cases only has come to be so common?
Hopefully now it's clear why I would want to help other women. I grew up with the same
misconceptions as any other woman in our society. What changed my mind about birth?
I informed myself. I read a lot. Eventually, I could make no other choice for my birth
other than a home birth with midwives. I hope that this web site is just the starting point
for parents looking for the safest, most dignified birth experience possible.
Copyright Kim Wildner
Visit Kim Wildners website at www.kimwildner.com
27
Mothers Intention: How Belief Shapes Birth
A Commonsense Guide to Safer, More Comfortable, Guilt-free Birth
in 5 Simple Steps
A Must Have for Pregnant Moms
A review of Mothers Intention by Sheri L. Menelli, author of Journey into Motherhood:
Inspirational Stories of Natural Birth
This is my favorite book to give as a shower gift. I love it so much that I've already given
several as gifts to family and friends. I also started selling it because I decided that this
was a book that my students had to read.
This book is like a roadmap for pregnancy and birthing. I thought I knew a lot as a
childbirth educator but I was surprised by how much I learned from this book. I really
wish I would have had this one during my first pregnancy, I would have made some
different choices.
I think it would be the best book to buy when you first find out you are pregnant. It
would save so much heartache and pain during labor.
This book is also helpful for doulas, midwives and childbirth educators. They will
certainly have better births if they have their clients read this book and it will help them
to become better teachers. It has helped me to be a much more effective teacher.
Overall, I give it 5 stars. I can't wait to see any other books that Ms. Wildner writes.
Copyright Sheri L. Menelli
My review from Amazon.com, March 3, 2004
It's a shame I can't give this book six stars - or more!
Mother's Intention is an insight into modern childbirth that gives you the facts not the
fiction, plus tons of encouragement and support for every mother-to-be who's searching
for the positive experience that is rightfully theirs. Rarely has the phrase "a must read"
been used with such good reason. It IS a must read, but not only for mothers-to-be, their
partners and their professional carers - EVERYONE even remotely interested in
understanding the childbirth experience and its meaning in our lives will benefit from
reading this outstanding book.
28
Mothers Intention: How Belief Shapes Birth
Excerpt from Chapter 9
Agony or Ecstasy
Perception is reality. Everything is neutral until we give meaning to an event based on
our perceptions.
I was first introduced to this concept through my husband, a quality manager in the
automotive industry. If the customer perceives a problemeven if no problem can be
found in design or functionthere is a problem. The customers perception is the quality
departments reality. Period.
The filters through which we view birthing and parenting alter our personal perceptions.
This is a simple fact. Perception is reality. A dozen people can witness one event and
every one of them will recount a different version of events.
Two mothers can have experiences seemingly exactly the same from the outside, but
have completely different internal interpretations of the value attributed to their
experience.
In one video I use in my childbirth classes, one woman in labor using self-hypnosis looks
like shes sleeping. Another woman in labor is howling down the hall. The birth
processthe muscles involved, the action of the muscles, the birthing hormones, etcis
the same for all normal births. These two mothers are experiencing the same physical
stimuli, the same sensations and functions, yet they have assigned very different
meanings to their experience, thus creating different realities.
Every event in our lives is neutral, in-and-of-itself. Our interpretations are a choice.
Some people tend by nature to always see the positive, some the negative. Some
circumstances seem quite negative by their very nature, though we see examples all
around us of people who have taken tragedy and turned it into opportunity. Christopher
Reeves comes to mind.
It is vitally important to acknowledge that perception is reality when speaking about
birth because birth is such a powerful, personal, defining moment in a womans life.
Each woman, as a unique individual, has unique perceptions, and will assign unique
meaning to what takes place during her birth. Failure to understand this fully has made
dialog about better birth more laborious than it needs to be. If the reader has visited
birth related message boards on the internet, the truth of this has already been made
apparent.
The plethora of bad birth programming on cable also illustrates this point. I find it very
difficult to watch these programs because they make me so sad and angry. In one show I
watched, three of three births ended up surgeries. All complications were predictable, all
preventablecaused, not encountered.
Copyright Kim Wildner
29
One mother was induced, labeled overdue via ultrasound. The induction failed, the baby
went into distress from the induction agents. Considering ultrasound is known to be an
inaccurate way to assess due dates, and it is also know that inductions agents like cytotec
and pitocin carry substantial risk to healthy mothers, this is not surprising.
One mother was doing great until her Dr. decided she wasnt progressing fast enough as
per Freidmans curve. Dr. Freidman himself has said its disturbing that his assessment
tool is abused in such a way, but it is none-the-less. The mothers doctor broke her
wateragain, known to be useless in substantially speeding up labor but to carry many
risks. The babys cord washed down out of the birth canal with the tide of water rushing
out, the technical term being cord prolapse. Emergency cesarean.
The last mother was also doing quite well, until the nurse suggested that if the mother
didnt get her epidural now, she couldnt have it later. The nurse assured the mother
that labor would get much worse, that she shouldnt be a martyr, and that she might as
well get the epidural now.
The mother, under such duress, decided to go ahead and get it. The baby went into
distress, again, foreseeable. The mother was assured that the epidural had nothing to do
with the series of events as she was whisked off to surgery.
In every case, cause and effect was predictable and obvious. In every case, the parents
were assured the interventions had nothing to do with the complication. In every case
the parents were thrilled that medical technology had saved their baby. And I was
furious at the injustice theyd unnecessarily endured!
This vision of birth is so foreign to what I know birth to be that I cannot fathom why
anyone would willingly put themselves though this unless they were sick or injured.
Our perceptions, thus our realities, were dramatically different.
Another example is somewhat singular to HypnoBirthing.
Many women would say that if they could envision the perfect labor it would be as short
as possible. With HypnoBirthing very short labor is becoming common. Often labors
are between 2 and 4 hours and painless. Sometimes though, mothers labor for hours
painlessly, not even realizing they are in labor. Or, they may realize they are in labor, but
so comfortable, they go about their usual business. Then, when the fetal ejection
response (1) is triggered, the baby seems to move down quite suddenly. For some women
this is uncomfortable (others actually find it enjoyable), maybe even painful, but of very
short duration. The intensity may only last for a couple of surges, but it takes the
mothers quite by surprise. Once the discomfort is felt, there may be fear that it will be so
for hours more. Not realizing that birth is imminent, the mother tenses up, engaging the
fear/tension/pain cycle. It will not hinder her labor the baby is nearly out at this point,
but it will alter the experience of the event for the mother.
She may feel disappointed, even angry. If she had plans to labor in a birthing tub,
surrounded by loved ones, aroma therapy, soft music and candles, her expectations have
been dashed, especially if labor was so fast all she had time to do was kneel to catch a
baby that was nearly falling out of her.
Copyright Kim Wildner
30
She may feel as if shes been hit by a truck with no time to emotionally assimilate what
was happening, finding herself suddenly with a newborn in her arms.
Someone who enjoyed such an experience, or someone who would like to, might respond
with Your birth was only an hour and youre upset?! Id love that! Never the less, for
the mother who was overwhelmed, the perception is a negative one.
Some women have been able to reframe their experience into something more positive
eventually, but the fact remains their initial reactions were partly due to expectations
lost, which changes the lens through which the event is viewed.
Pain is perhaps the most subjective reality of all, especially in labor. So, must pain be
inherent in labor and birth?
Whats Pain Got To Do With It?
There is no doubt that painful birth has been the experience of millions of women. So
prevalent in our society is this concept, that it is taken as a given that birth must be an
excruciating ordeal.
Let them cling to the notion that suffering and birthing are two sides of the same coin. I
want to explore the possibility of painless birthwithout drugs.
Wait! Im not crazy! Years ago when I first read about painless birth my reaction was also
Yeah, right! but Ive changed my beliefs regarding birth and pain. I hope I can help
alleviate the fear for the reader as well.
Even in my midwifery training I learned that pain in labor is essential for both
physiological and psychological reasons. I still believe that in certain instances pain is
beneficial. It can be a great communicator, both guiding and warning.
I accepted without question that birth was painful. Still, I felt that it was manageable
when weighed against the harm drugs posed. When I gave birth to my own daughter in
1991 labor was definitely not painless. It was bearable. Ive certainly felt worse, before
and since. Birth was a breeze compared to pathological pain such as a kidney infection, a
ruptured ovarian cyst or a broken arm.
My own birthing experience, combined with the first hundred or so births I witnessed,
reinforced my belief. I did see a couple of women give birth painlessly, one even
orgasmicly. However, I felt that they were lucky or somehow different from the rest of us.
Maybe they had a high tolerance for pain, I reasoned.
I viewed natural birth as an accomplishment to be proud of. I marveled that there were
women who trained incessantly to be thin or to climb mountains, surely enduring more
pain for longer periods than what labor would require, only to demand to be numbed on
the first labor twinge. I felt it quite ironic that empowerment seminars with fire walking
and river rafting were all the rage, yet womens built opportunity for enlightenment was
numbed with drugs. What I see now is that my belief colored what I saw, so that what I
saw supported my belief.
Copyright Kim Wildner
31
There are known variables that contribute to pain in labor including positioning (of both
mother and baby) tension, environmental factors, obstetrical management and a
multitude of other things under the control of the mother. Could it be that a mothers
choices, in pregnancy and during the labor and birth, had any impact on her experience?
Absolutely.
Once I attained certification as a Mongan Method HypnoBirthing practitioner and
heard firsthand stories of quick and easy births over and over again, I knew for certain
what I had hoped was possible. Birth isnt the problem. The obstetrically managed
births, known for decades for higher morbidity and mortality rates as well as
epidemically high, unnecessary surgical births, are.
It was finally the second birth of my best friend that left no doubt in my mind that my
past ideas about pain in birth had been wrong.
I hoped that HypnoBirthing would work for her. Her first birth was textbook, 12 hours
of labor with 2 hours of pushing. It was hard work, and it was painful. It was emotionally
difficult for me because I love her and hated to see her in pain.
When I attended her HypnoBirthing two years later she was radiant. She was calm,
relaxed and retained her keen sense of humor throughout. From the time her water
broke and labor kicked in, to the time her 10 lb. 4 oz. son was in her arms, was an hour
and a half with a 13-minute second stage.
As beautiful as that was, the amazing part was that she had broken her tailbone 4 days
prior to birth. She never once felt pain from her injury. She beamed, Its over already? It
was so easy!
When I believed it, I saw it. Once I saw it, I felt compelled to understand it better.
Is pain inescapable in labor?
In early attempts to let women in on the secret of comfortable birth, I asked parents in
my classes if labor has to hurt. The responses have been consistent, likely thoughts the
reader may have, so I will address them.
Labor must be painful. Its Eves curse.
This belief is often attributed to the Bible, Genesis 3:16. The word translated as pain or
sorrow is the Hebrew etzev.
This same word is used 16 times throughout the Bible. Nowhere else is it translated as
pain. In fact, in the very next verse, Genesis 3:17, it is accurately translated as it is in all
other instances, as toil. (2)
Even if pain and suffering in labor were punishment for Eves sin, isnt the purpose of
baptism to cleanse away sin? Wasnt the purpose of Jesus dying on the cross to atone for
the sins of the world? Many women giving birth quickly and comfortably are non-
Christian. Why would they be able to birth comfortably, but the faithful suffer? How does
this reasoning make a 90% epidural rate ok, but not a relaxation method for more
comfortable birth?
Copyright Kim Wildner
32
Contractions hurteveryone knows that!
Who is everyone? Obviously not HypnoBirthing women! Obviously not blissful
homebirth mothers.
The uterus contracts painlessly in its normal functioning at times other than during
birth. During menstruation, the uterus contracts, the cervix opening to allow the
contents of the uterus to pass. Most women will not experience pain during this process.
The uterus contracts painlessly during the Braxton-Hicks contractions of pregnancy. The
uterus contracts painlessly during orgasm.
Every muscle in the body functions by contraction and release. No other healthy muscle,
going about its normal function, hurts. A malnourished or dehydrated muscle hurts. An
injured muscle hurts. Normal function such as walking, flexing a bicep or the beating of a
healthy heart does not hurt.
Something huge is coming through such a small opening!
The uterus is the size of a pear before pregnancy. At term, it has stretched to
accommodate the baby. Being pregnant isnt painful. There are normal discomforts as
the body adjusts, but most women would not judge it painful.
The cervix has stretch receptors in it that signal the brain to release endorphins. These
are the bodys own strong painkillers. The cervix thins as it opens over the babys head,
as a turtleneck sweater pulled over a head. This means there is extra material to work
with, so to speak as it goes from very thick and soft, to paper thin, disappearing as it is
taken up as part of the uterus, which it is.
Viewing images of crowning in class invariably causes wincing. Again, we look to the
amazing design of women to understand why this part doesnt have to hurt.
By childbearing age, the genital area is comprised of many folds of skin. During birth,
like with the extra thickness of the cervix, these folds are taken up. They smooth out
around the babys head until they are gone completelylike an accordion. This built in
give is why episiotomies are so rarely necessary.
Painless BirthAn Old-New Concept
Earlier, we explored choices in childbirth classes. A little history may shed light on how
long the concept of painless birth has been around.
Between the early 1900s and the 1970s, three doctors tried to help American women give
birth naturally and comfortably.
In 1913 Dr. Grantly Dick-Read asked a woman hed just attended in birth why she had
refused chloroform for the relief of pain. Her reply was It didnt hurt. It wasnt mean to,
was it, Doctor?
Other similar experiences caused Dick-Read to question what hed learned about
birthing. He concluded that what made these painless labors different was the absence of
Copyright Kim Wildner
33
fear. The idea of the fear/tension/pain cycle was born. By the 1950s Dick-Read had
published several books on the subject. (3)
In the 1940s Dr. Robert Bradley became a natural childbirth proponent, coming to many
of the same conclusions that Dr. Grantly Dick-Read had. From Dr. Bradleys work came
his book Husband-Coached Childbirth and Bradley Childbirth classes.
Dr. Bradley was very interested in hypnosis and originally promoted his method as
using hypnosis. However, during the 1950s and 1960s hypnosis was controversial.
Eventually, the emphasis on hypnosis was dropped and put on "deep relaxation" instead.
During the 1950s, Dr. Ferdinand Lamaze witnessed painless birth in Russia. He
documented what he felt were the essential components for a comfortable birth. In the
early years, Lamaze was unabashedly about self-hypnosis, but possibly meeting the
same resistance as Bradley, his method was termed psychoprophylaxisor mind
prevention. The original intent was painless birth.
Lamaze Internationals (5) current objectives, while evidence-based and mother/baby-
friendly, do not seem to include the idea of painless birth.
Many nurses, and doctors, object to teaching painless childbirth on the premise that if
we say its possible, women who perceive birth as painful will feel like failures. In fact,
right or wrong, anything contradicting current obstetrical management (6)much of
which is the origin of painwill be excluded from discussion.
This is like saying that if women have painful periods, they should feel like failures for
not menstruating painlessly because most women do. Pain is a subjective experience.
Perceptions differ. There are too many variables in birth, and in the choices that women
make, to ensure that every woman have the same exact experience.
Apply this logic to any other situation and it becomes ridiculously obvious its flawed.
Say, a friend and I have two garden lots. My lot is sandy, hers rich and fertile. I have
slugs and bugs, she has no pests. We have the same tools and the same seeds, but my
climate is cooler for more of the year. If we plant gardens, can we expect the same
results? What if I procrastinate and plant a month later than I should? What if I am
guided to fertilize and choose not to? What if I let deer come in and trample what is
growing?
A Rose by any other name
One mother of the 50s who had benefited from Dr. Grantley Dick-Reads work decided it
was time for women to take back their births. Her name is Marie Mongan and she is the
originator of a program utilizing the necessary components of a gentle birth
HypnoBirthing.
As the name implies, HypnoBirthing is unabashedly about self-hypnosis. Mongan has
chosen to educate people about what self-hypnosis actually is instead of cloaking the
method in alternative language.
Misconception still surrounds the word hypnosis. It isnt something someone does to
you. All hypnosis is self-hypnosis. Anyone can and does access this state several times a
day. Falling asleep or waking up, driving, reading or even watching TV, our brainwave
Copyright Kim Wildner
34
pattern is the same as in hypnosis. Advertisers know this and use it to their advantage.
Commercials slip information into our subconscious constantly. If we are in a state of
hypnosis when a commercial comes on for a flame-broiled burger, why dont we all rush
to get one?
Because no one will do something against their own values while in hypnosis. Those
whose only exposure to hypnosis has been stage hypnosis have probably seen
participants do outrageous things, however, stage hypnotists purposely choose people
who might act outrageously anyway if asked after a couple of stiff drinks.
Back to the burger
If I am a vegetarian and a commercial comes on for a burger, Im not going to instantly
desire seared cow. I might go to my freezer for a veggie patty. However, if Im already
thinking a burger sounds good, Ill probably get up and goor at least the thought will
stick with me until the next time I drive by the burger place.
The common thread
As briefly mentioned earlier, in the 1970s Dr. Herbert Benson studied a state he termed
the relaxation response. He acknowledged that this relaxed state carried many labels,
one being hypnosis. If the word hypnosis is objectionable, the physiological state and
brainwave pattern characteristic of hypnosis, and the relaxation response, has also been
called biofeedback, prayer and meditation. No matter what name it goes by, whats
important is how the mind affects the body.
Bensons main concern was relieving stress. He recognized that modern day humans
spend far too much time engaged in a fight or flight response which you may have
heard of. His contention was that our modern life kept us in this state continually,
harming our health. We now know this to be true.
In birth methods that actually result in comfortable, shorter, natural birth, the
interruption of the fear/tension/pain cycle was integral to the method. What I found
interesting when I read Dr. Bensons work (7) was that the essential components in what
he termed the relaxation response, the opposite of the fight or flight response, were
what made up the working methods for painless birth.
The four elements
If we look at what is required to elicit the relaxation response, we can see why some
methods may have worked when they were developed, but no longer do.
1. A comfortable (and safe) environment.
Dr. Lamazes concepts did not translate to American hospitals where the limbic system,
the primitive part of the brain that conducts birthing, interpreted strangers and
unfamiliar odors as signals to fight or flee. This also explains why homebirth mothers
usually consider their births more manageable.
Also, husbands were not allowed in the delivery room, as a rule, until Husband-Coached
Childbirth. The painless births that Lamaze saw in Russia included labor support. Just
Copyright Kim Wildner
35
this one component has since been proven to improve outcomes (8) yet it wasnt until
recent years that American women had even heard of the term doula.
2. A mental devicea sound, word, prayer, fixed gaze or focus on breathing.
The counted breath and focal point of Lamaze is one example of this. HypnoBirthing
uses deep abdominal breathing which holds a relaxation trigger in and of itself.
3. A passive attitudenot worrying about performing well and the ability to put
aside distracting thoughts.
Again, harder to achieve in a setting where everything down to whether or not you pee
enough is obtrusively assessed.
4. A comfortable position.
When Lamazes methods were brought over from Europe, this was not even an option in
American hospitalsall women were laid on their backs, the most uncomfortable
position imaginable for birthing.
Before the routine use of non-medically indicated technology, Lamaze might have
helped many women despite less than ideal conditions. A mother may not have been
comfortable in the hospital, but she might be attended by the physician shed had since
childhood. She might not have been allowed a comfortable position, but if she were able
to focus intently, she might be able to block uncomfortable sensations. As birth began to
revolve around the convenience of staff and the use of technology, mothers would have
had a harder time adapting. As these mothers experienced painful labors, the mothers
and those attending her made the sweeping assumption that Lamaze doesnt work,
never considering it was the adaptations at the level of the individual instructor, at odds
with the organizational vision, that rendered it ineffective, not the method itself.
The importance of deep, slow breathing for relaxation is now widely recognized. The
success couples experience is due to their dedication to being informed consumers and
reducing interventions to only those that are medically indicated. Bradley, ALACE and
BirthWorks, indeed most independent classes, help many women in the same way but
may or may not teach techniques that trigger the relaxation response. HypnoBirthing
does teach such techniques along with wise consumerism.
New Choices
If our only choice in labor really was torture or being numb to the most important event
in a womans life, it would be quite understandable that women would disconnect. The
spin that has been put on this normal process is that no drugs=pain, drugs=no pain with
some serious misrepresentations. Its human nature to not look very deeply into those
misrepresentations if we believe that it will take away our salvation.
Now that we know that we dont have to make a choice between suffering in labor or our
babies well-being we truly have options. HypnoBirthing has revived the concept of
comfortable birth, now supported by the science of evidence based care. Those willing to
conquer the fear our culture has falsely instilled in us will change the face of what it
Copyright Kim Wildner
36
means to birth safelygently and with dignity. Well see it when we believe it. Perception
is everything.
Everyday, in every circumstance, including the birthing of your child, you have the power
to choose your perceptions. There is neither good nor bad sensation until you assign
meaning to it. Your response to labor is not a function of physiology, but how you choose
to perceive labor.
I am not suggesting that all labor is painlessonly that normal labor can be. Obviously,
if illness or injury should become part of the experience, pain may be an important
communicator. Also, if your birthing choices include things that cause pain in labor,
realistically you may or may not be able to reframe the sensation until the pain-causing
elements are eliminated, either by actually removing them or by using self-hypnosis to
mitigate their effect.
Do we know what causes pain in labor? Without a doubt. Anything that creates tension,
fear, or disruption of the primitive birthing brain. Strangers, unfamiliar scents, bright
lights, constant interruption of the mothers efforts, unnatural positions and alteration of
the birthing hormones with artificial chemicals. In short, most of what is considered
usual at the typical American birth today. No wonder women have a hard time accepting
the idea that labor doesnt have to be painful!
If you have had a past negative or painful birth, the good news is you can choose to learn
from that event, making different choices this time. Only you can decide how to use your
experience. Will it continue to hurt you everyday, affecting each subsequent birth, or will
you refuse to carry it beyond this day?
Emotional pain is a filter in itself. Though it may seem that it is never ending and deep,
there is another side eventually. There are inspirational stories to draw from
concentration camp survivors, mothers who have lost children to drunk drivers who then
went on to save others children, and John Walsh, who lost his son Adam to murder but
went on to help others. Through unspeakable pain, these individuals have made the
choice to use their experiences in a positive way.
Even if you are healing from an unexpected birth outcome and it doesnt seem possible
right now, there will come a time when that choice is yours. If you are pregnant again
after an unfortunate outcome, as far too many wounded mothers are, it might behoove
you to be courageous and seek help now before the past affects the outcome of the
present.
Ultimately, how you perceive pregnancy and birth is your choice. The birth shows where
strangers attend mothers in strange environments meant for sick people are alien to me.
I choose to see pregnancy and birth as natural, physiological events until there is reason
to believe otherwise. Fortunately for me, science backs up my belief. Its painful for me to
see other peoples distorted perception of birth portrayed as reality when I have seen and
experienced something so radically different, especially when its contrary to every bit of
evidence as to what makes birth safe.
I understand perception is reality so I recognize that the birthing choices made within
such a reality make sense to the parents making them. It just makes me sad that anyone
would choose it.
Copyright Kim Wildner
37
Our personalities, experiences, beliefs and attitudes powerfully influence the
interpretations we assign to birth; those interpretations, in turn, determine what we will
experience and how others will respond to us. This is neither good nor badit simply is.
All of us view the world through our personal filters. Filters may be healthy or distorted;
constructive or destructive. To make our own best decisions, we need to recognize what
our filters may be so they dont distort perceptions critical to our safe birthing decisions.
There is no question that our filters include perceptions passed down to us from mothers
before us who processed their own experiences through their own filters, as well as from
medical personnel who view birth through the filter of pathology. A woman raised to be
afraid of birth as a medical eventvirtually all US womenwill come to birth afraid. Fear
creates pain.
If this view were reality, it would stand to reason that everyone would experience it,
which we have established is not so. If there are mothers who choose a joyful experience,
maybe you can consciously create a joyful reality, too!
We are products of both conscious and unconscious input. What matters is not whether
that input was positive or negative, but how we choose to let it affect our pregnancy and
birth now.
Maybe its not others perceptions that brought us to see birth as scary or dangerous.
Maybe you have actually had an unfair and horrible birth. Allowing your current reality
to be affected by past events allows the past to dictate both your present and your future.
In order to ensure that this baby and this birth, are not disrupted by the other, past
experience, learn about what went wrong. Is it preventable? If not, is it a repeating sort
of problem? Is it reasonable to be concerned this time, or is an unreasonable fear
clouding your perceptions. Know your filters so you can compensate for them. Accepting
accountability for what you can control in your birth makes what you cant more
acceptable.
Some people adapt to stress gracefully, others come unglued when faced with the same
pressures. How do they differ? One sees an opportunity, the other an obstacle. Their
perceptions, their filters, determine the quality of their experience. One parent, faced
with prenatal tests and interventions may decide that even if the chance of something
going wrong is small, they couldnt live with themselves if their child developed a
problem that might have been prevented. This is actually often suggested to them by the
physician who wants to do the testing. Well, if it were my child and I could have
prevented such-and-such, I couldnt live with myself. No matter if the condition of
concern is likely to be minor and the treatment actually more dangerous.
Another parent might weigh the risk and benefits just as carefully and see things
completely opposite. If the condition of concern is equal or lesser than possible
complications resulting from the testing or treatment, this parent may say to themselves,
Of course I would feel horrible if something bad happened, preventable or not, as any
parent would, but Id feel worse it I were the one to cause it by taking the riskier action.
In the five years it took for my husband and myself to get pregnant, we did a lot of
research on healthy pregnancy and safe birth. We decided that if we only got to do this
Copyright Kim Wildner
38
once, we didnt have room for error in our choices.
After our homebirth, one family member said to another, Its a damn good thing
everything turned out okay! If anything had gone wrong, Id never forgive them! If
anything had gone wrong, which I knew to be unlikely, considering statistically I was
certain wed made the safe choice, Im sure we would have felt sufficiently bereaved.
However, knowing what I knew about those statistics, had we opted for a hospital birth
and something had gone wrong, which was much more likely, I would have felt worse
because I would have felt that we knowingly put our child in danger. Ironically, we would
have gotten sympathy for an unexpected outcome for the socially acceptable choice,
though we didnt get support for the wonderful outcome of our socially unacceptable
choice, no matter how well educated we were on the matter.
This family member loved us very much, but often, when someone elses filter is
drastically different from our own, the behaviors resulting from their filters are labeled
strange. Our filters were simply different. From my moderate standpoint, I might form
similar opinions about unassisted birth.
I support parents right to choose it, knowing that the odds are with them, but I wouldnt
do it. No one is wrong, just viewing birth though a different lens.
A common misperception is that if one persons perception is right for them, the other
persons must be wrong. Nothing could be further from the truth. Clearly, the perception
of reality is not the same, but the reasoning behind decisions could, in fact, be very much
alike. They start out with divergent filters, so their eventual reality outcome will be as
well. What matters is whether or not their filters result in the safest, most satisfying birth
for them. That can only be determined by each mother, each parent, alone.
I know faulty assumptions resulting from my own filters have led me down unproductive
paths in my own life. Im sure if you think about it, there are times when your own filters
have led you to faulty assumptionsquite likely regarding pregnancy and birth.
This is only a bad thing if you fail to scrutinize your assumptions before treating them
as fact.
The behavior of most parents, physicians and nurses would make perfect sense if the
initial assumption of birth as a painful, dangerous, medical event were sound. Current
obstetric management can be viewed as a test of the validity of that assumption. If
pregnancy were dangerous, routine medical testing would improve outcomes. It hasnt.
If birth were a medical disaster in waiting, routine medical intervention would not
disrupt the process. It does. If technology were integral to the process of birth, routine
technology would improve outcomes. It hasnt. If birth were inherently painful, all
women would suffer without medicine. They dont. The initial assumption is proven
faulty.
Continuing to behave under faulty birthing assumptions perpetuates the perception of a
reality with no basis in fact. This is illogical for parents who desire comfort and safety for
their birth.
Copyright Kim Wildner
39
Have you made assumptions regarding birth without testing their validity and then acted
on those assumptions as if they were irrefutable truth? Is the consequence of this
behavior that your birthing reality is based not on fact, but on a fear-based, untested
perception?
If you accept the assumption that normal birth is always painful, you might disregard
evidence to the contrary. This assumption will affect your opinion of women who choose
to give birth at home without drugs. Your assumption may cause you to make decisions
that arent in your best interest, or that of your baby. Other women, making the same
assumption, may demand their epidural at the door. Suppose that, she too, has failed to
test the initial assumption. Both of you have made faulty initial assumptions which
neither has tested for truth or reliability. You may be operating logically from your
perspective, but starting with wrong information, even with right thinking, can still
result in huge mistakes. Your fear-based thinking is more likely to result in major
complications, which will reinforce your fear...a self-perpetuating cycle. Sadly, this is
where we, as women, are today. This is the cycle I want to help you break so that you,
too, may experience ecstatic birth.