Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 110

S.O.

S e - Clarion Of Dalit - Weekly Newspaper On Web


Working For The Rights & Survival Of The Oppressed
Editor: NAGARAJA.M.R VOL.8 issue.18 .30/04/2014

Atrocities on Women by JUDGES


https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System


http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-LegalSystem ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-youdeaf-dumb-blind

PAY UP Justice Sathasivam - DAMAGES PAYMENT / FINAL SHOW-CAUSE


NOTICE TO CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA
I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG
officials are forwarding my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not.
They will be held accountable for their lapses if any. This notice is
against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion
with criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served
against them , to the office of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the
individual level I do whole heartedly respect honourable justice
Sathasivam.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679
In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom
RIGHT TO INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by
the government,as the information opens up the crimes of V.V.I.Ps &
leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least
bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat
cats , parasites are a drain on the public exchequer . these
people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH
closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes
of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not
yet replied. It clearly shows that you are least bothered about the

lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent
to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police
to enquire me ,to take my statement, to repeatedly call me to police
station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy legal immunity
privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the
police / investigating officer to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else
why dont all of you are not appearing before the police voluntarily
for enquiry ?at the least why dont all of you are not sending
your statement about the case to the police either through legal counsel
or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by denying me
job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil court
,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my
newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath
of office. this amounts to public cheating & moral turpitude on
your part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens
of india and of neighbouring countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS
CHARTER to which india is a signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as
a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have
caused me damages / losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE
within 30 days , why you cannt be legally prosecuted for the above
mentioned crimes .
If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages ,
transportation , job , etc must be borne by the government. prevoiusly
the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer
of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the

guilty culprits even once to police station for questioning , as the culprits
are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done
by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me
or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run
accidents , loss of lives , etc , the jurisdictional police together with
above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief Justice of India &
Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if
criminal nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or
my dependents to silence me , this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government
of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of
my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then
that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund.
afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from
the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty judges , police officials ,
public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries. Thanking you. Jai Hind ,
Vande Mataram.
Date : 19.03.2014..yours sincerely,
Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System


http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-LegalSystem ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,

Chief Justice of India ( CJI ) a Criminal ?


- PIL Appeal to Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of Mandamus
To,
Honourable Registrar ,
Supreme Court of India ,
New Delhi.
Subject : PIL appeal for WRIT OF MANDAMUS & Disciplinary action , c
riminal proceedings against Chief Justice of India
The chief justice of india is not replying to my repeated show-cause notices ,damage payment notices nor taking
appropriate legal actions , in time . However the public servants take their thousands of rupees salary & perks well in time
without fail on 1st of every month. As a result of continued negligence of constitutional duties since years
we public are suffering injustices , crimes which could have been prevented are taking place. Thereby CJI is aiding the
criminals in committing crimes & cover up of crimes , in the course becoming a criminal himself. We salute our freedom
fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic
India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors among public servants , among judiciary &among
police who are greater threat to India security & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones expression in any forms written , oral , etc becomes
information input to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information & Expression
are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is the reason , Right to Expression is the basic
fundamental right as well as human right of every Indian citizen. When a persons right to expression is
violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are violated. Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of
Expression. In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants are functioning . However till date
publicservants are hiding behind the veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british
to suppress native Indians ). By this cover-up public servants are hiding their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement ,
failures , etc. even RTI Act is not beingfollowed intoto by public servants. However the recent delhi high court ruling affirming
that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to answer RTI request , is note worthy. Our previous RTI request to CJI ,
union home secretary of GOI, President of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The information is sought

were answers to the following questions mentioned in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the
past , present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens , due to wrong / illegal workpractices of
Indian judges , police & public servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors , anti-nationals , criminals in
public service .The information we are seeking are no defense secrets , no national secrets .The truthful information exposes
the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole
issue as karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to prosecute high &
mighty ,constitutional functionaries. They have not even enquired the guilty VVIPs even
once however Under pressure from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the complainant to police station took
statements from me all for closing the files. Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider this as
a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their
duties & to answer the questions. As the trial court Judges cross verify the antecedents , history of the parties in a case to
ascertain partys honesty ,integrity , as the investigating police officers cross check the antecedents , history of a
complainant / accussed /witnesses to ascertain their honesty , integrity of the accussed / complainant ,in the same way the
parties in a case , as complainant / accussed / witnesseshave a right to ascertain the integrity , honesty of the trial court judge
& investigating police officers to ensure they are not biased and provide a fair ,level ground. JAI
HIND. VANDE MATARAM.
Date:06.10.2013
Place : Mysore

Yours sincerely ,
Nagaraja.M.R

Salary of Member of Parliament Rupees 130000 per month + grand allowances 5 star heritage
bungalow , 5 star air / train travel , 5 star health care facility , etc all at tax payers expense

There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court of
conscience It supercedes all other courts.
- Mahatma Gandhi

Salary of Chief Justice of India Rupees 100000 per month & salary of
supreme court judge Rupees 90000 per month plus 5 star heritage
bungalow , 5 star air / train travel , 5 star health care facility , etc all at
tax payers expense

Hunger Deaths Malnutrition Deaths Poverty Earning Less than Rupees 32


per day

Honest Hard Working Child Laborers Earning Less Than Rupees 32 per
day

Corrupt Dishonest Criminal Public Servants Earning More than Rupees


5000 per day Murderers of Justice

Ill-gotten Wealth of Corrupt Public Servants

Murderers of Justice Shame to You

Follow me at
http://www.facebook.com/people/Nagaraj-Mysore-

Raghupathi/513253184 ,
http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw ,
http://twitter.com/naghrw ,

A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System


http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-LegalSystem ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
SHAME TO CORRUPT RAPIST JUDGES OF INDIA

When a Judge Himself Commits Crime , When a POLICE Himself


robs , Murders .
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding
acts , for others to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is
excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a
mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he can
be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime
, many thieves go scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public
servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be
sought by the aggrieved.
just think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself commits
crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public

and obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental


duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in
public service to commit more crimes. that is exactly what is happening in
india. the educated public must raise to the occasion & peacefully ,
democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary , public
service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S
DREAM.
I have shown in the following attachment how justice is bought ,
purchased , manipulated in INDIA with actual cases. Just see the
recent examples of supreme court judges involved in sexual assault
case & ROOST Resort Mysore Sex scandal involving judges , if any
ordinary fellow had committed the same crimes he would have been
hauled over the coal fire. Just take another recent example of Prisoner
Movie actor sanjay dutt , TADA provisions were diluted by the judge to
favour him and now he is getting parole week after week while the
ordinary convicts never get a single parole throught their sentence. What
Brilliant Judges , what brilliant police sirji.

Editorial : PIL Appeal To Honorable Supreme court of India For Writ of


Mandamus - No JAIL for Criminal Judges & Criminal Police ?
We salute our freedom fighters , military personnel & martyrs for all the
sacrifices made by them. Let us build a strong , Secular , Democratic
India by getting rid off few corrupt elements , anti nationals , traitors
among public servants , among judiciary & among police who are
greater threat to Indias unity & integrity than Pakistani terrorists or
chinese military.
Information input forms part of process of ones expression. Ones
expression in any forms written , oral , etc becomes information input
to the opposite person , in turn he expresses his reply. Information &
Expression are inseparable parts & form lifeline of a democracy. That is

the reason , Right to Expression is the basic fundamental right as well as


human right of every Indian citizen. When a persons right to expression
is violated , his other rights to equality , justice , etc also are violated.
Suppression of Information amounts to curbing of Expression.
In a democracy , people have a right to know how the public servants
are functioning. However till date public servants are hiding behind the
veil of Officials Secrets Act (which is of british vintage created by british
to suppress native indians). By this cover-up public servants are hiding
their own corruption , crimes , mismanagement , failures , etc. even RTI
Act is not being followed intoto by public servants. However the recent
delhi high court ruling affirming that CJI is under RTI purview & bound to
answer RTI request , is noteworthy.
Our previous RTI request to CJI , union home secretary of GOI, President
of India , DG & IGP of GOK and others were not honored. The
information I sought were answers to the following questions mentioned
in the below mentioned websites . the questions concerned the past ,
present continuing injustices meted out to millions of Indian citizens ,
due to wrong / illegal work practices of Indian judges , police & public
servants . The information we sought would expose the traitors , antinationals , criminals in public service. The information we are seeking
are no defense secrets , no national secrets. The truthful information
exposes the anti-nationals , traitors in the public service & strengthens
our national security , national unity & integrity.
Hereby , i do request the honourable supreme court of india , for a
Supreme Court monitored CBI Enquiry into this whole issue as
karnataka police are helpless , they don't have legal powers to
prosecute high & mighty , constitutional functionaries. They have not
even enquired the guilty VVIPs even once however Under pressure
from higher-ups they repeatedly called me the complainant to police
station took statements from me all for closing the files.
Hereby , I do request the honorable supreme court of India to consider
this as a PIL for : writ of Mandamus and to issue instructions to the
concerned public servants in the following cases to perform their duties
& to answer the questions.

As the trial court Judges cross verify the antecedents , history of the
parties in a case to ascertain partys honesty , integrity , as the
investigating police officers cross check the antecedents , history of a
complainant / accussed / witnesses to ascertain their honesty , integrity
of the accussed / complainant , in the same way the parties in a case ,
as complainant / accussed / witnesses have a right to ascertain the
integrity , honesty of the trial court judge & investigating police
officers to ensure they are not biased and provide a fair , level
ground. JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.
Yours sincerely ,
Nagaraj.M.R.
READ FULL DETAILED ARTICLE AT :
JUDGES Cover up Land ScAMS
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-landscams ,
https://docs.google.com/viewer?
a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxlY2xhcmlvbm9mZGFsaXR8Z3g6
NmI0MzYwZTIwMjhjYjg2Mw ,
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/no-jail-for-criminal-judgespolice-1
There is a higher court than the court of justice and that is the court
of conscience It super cedes all other courts.
-

Mahatma Gandhi

Editorial : PIL - DEATH PENALTY RIGHT OR WRONG ? ABLOLISH DEATH PENALTY


AN APPEAL TO H.E.Honourable PRESIDENT OF INDIA & HONOURABLE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA

WHY DO WE KILL PEOPLE WHO KILL PEOPLE TO TELL PEOPLE THAT KILLING
PEOPLE IS BAD ???
Just consider the following facts persons convicted in rarest of rare cases that
of Assassinating a former prime minister of india are commuted to life sentence
& within hours released by state government of Tamil Nadu. Where as some
convicts convicted in heinous crimes but not heinous or rarest of rare like PM
Rajiv Gandhi assassination were hanged without alternatives like
commuting their sentances to life term.

Poor , tribal people in chattisgarh , Andhra Pradesh , Jharkhand & other states
infested with terrorism / naxalism (even without any material incriminating
evidences) are charged with charges like giving food , cloth & medical aid to
terrorists / naxalites, thereby waging war against the nation . Those poor
tribals are put behind bars and tried under draconian laws like TADA , POTA ,
MOCA , etc. Where as movie star Sanjay Dutt who knowing fully well the
intentions kept deadly arms in his house . Arms were given to him by master
minds of Mumbai attacks. Initially he was booked under TADA , then TADA
charges were dropped and awarded a lesser prison term than actually deserved.
Further , he is getting paroles week after week which other ordinary prisoners
are unable to get even once.

Consider the case of Bhopal Gas Tragedy , the company & top most officials were
well aware of safety procedural lapses in the Bhopal plant , still continued the
operations. When the accident happened slaughtering thousands & maiming lakhs
of people , the government first charged the head of the company with charges
of man slaughter. Afterwards , he was arrested but stealthily facilitated to
escape to his home country literally flown out by the police , chief minister of
the government. Subsequently chief Justice of India dropped man slaughter
charges against him & filed lenient charges against him making the way for
lenient punishment in future (JUDGEMENT FIXING). CJI benefitted from it ?
Paradoxically after retirement , CJI became head of the trust controlling crores
of rupees monitoring the rehabilitation of Bhopal gas victims.

In this context it is quite pertinent to note that In India with money power , right
political connections any crime can be done & be scot free . In India Legal system is
for Sale , Judicial orders can be manipulated. The convict in a case may be an
innocent without recourse to right connections & legal aid. So , one cannt be 100%
sure whether the death convict has actually committed the crime. Prison sentence

can be reversed , if judgement is found faulty but what if death sentence is carried
out on an innocent person ? JUDGE is not god.

A criminal is not born, but made by social circumstances. For the crime
scenario in India , every citizen of India is indirectly responsible.
Our present inefficient, corrupt legal system , is wholly dependent on
evidences which a rich criminal can create or destroy at his sweet
will. Police forcibly take confessions from the accussed , by applying
3rd degree torture methods. Some of the judges are literally auctioning
" judicial orders" for bribe. Due to all these reasons one cann't be
100% sure about one criminal's conviction. In such cases, capital
punishment will be unfair & inhuman. It must be made mandatory, in all
death penalty cases that polygraph, lie detector tests, etc must be
conducted on " death convicts " , to know whether they are innocent or
guilty inspite of hostile evidences. Fundamentally, the capital
punishment has failed
as a deterrent.
The people who clamour for continuance of death penalty are BIASED,
INHUMAN, BUTCHERS & CANIBALS. Why don't they ask for death penalty to
policemen, who murder people through 3rd degree torture, in lock-ups &
fake encounters ? why don't they ask for death penalty to corrupt
judges who sells judicial orders for bribe ? why don't they ask for
death penalty to builders who cause building collapses, resulting in
mass murders ? why don't they ask for death
penalty to corrupt government doctors who refuses to treat poor patient
without bribe, causing the murder of poor patient ? why don't they ask
for death penalty to industrialist/ traders who sell adulterated food
items, spurious drugs/ medicines, in turn causing mass murders ? why
don't they ask for death penalty to corrupt government officials , who
help criminals, industrialists? Why don't they ask for death penalty to
politicians who create communal & other riots, who have ties with
foreign intelligence agencies, terrorist outfits ? Why don't they ask
for death penalty to mole in the P.M.O & the senior officers of
National Security Council who passed on national secrets ? Why don't
they ask for death penalty to public servants , ministers who gave aid
, support to terrorist outfits like L.T.T.E out of government of india
coffers , killing hundreds of srilankans , tamils ?
These are the guilty persons , criminals who don't personally ,
directly murder human beings but cunningly murder hundreds which go
unnoticed by any. For the person who barbarically murders one human
being you prescribe CAPITAL PUNISHMENT but for those who murder
hundreds you say nothing why ? THEY WON'T ASK FOR IT, BECAUSE MOST OF
THE PERSONS WHO ARE DEMANDING DEATH PENALTY ARE BIASED, SELFISH &

BELONG TO ONE OF THE SECTIONS OF CRIMINALS MENTIONED ABOVE. They lack


objectivity.
Death penalty is the ultimate . cruel , inhuman and degrading
punishment. It violates the right to life Article 1 of universal
declaration of human rights. It is irrevocable , prone to judicial
errors and can be inflicted on innocents. It has never been shown to
deter crime more effectively than other punishments. In most of the
countries including india , judicial system is ineffective ,
inefficient to prosecute impartially both poor & rich criminals. Those
condemned to death penalty mostly come from poor background who are
unable to afford wise & articulate Advocates who can efficiently argue
their case. Against these poor accussed , the criminal nexus of
police-criminal-bureaucrat builds up fake evidences , extracts forced
confessions by 3rd degree torture. Most of death convicts world over
belongs to either poor , TRIBALS , DALITS , etnic minorities ,
political dissidents , children , mentally ill. No rich & mighty
criminal is ever prosecuted let alone hanged.
The judicial system which depends on technical facts like evidences
lacks sense to figure out truth out of fake evidences , also as judges
are human beings they are prone to err. Add to this corruption in
judiciary. Death penalty is irreversible & irrevocable. In a mature
democracy like U.S.A with relatively efficient judicial system itself
hundreds of cases of death convicts were found to be wrong , convicts
were found to be innocents upon review & were let free. Where as in
india , the accussed lacks the wherewithal to argue his case in the
first place then how can he arrange for case review ? no judge is god ,
if a hanged person is found to be innocent the judge doesn't has the
ability to bring back the hanged person to life , do such judges have
right to snatch away lives ?
Hereby HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH'S Urges H.E . PRESIDENT OF INDIA & HONOURABLE
SUPREME COURT OF INDIA ,
1.
to stay all death penalties until equitable criminal justice system
with respect to above mentioned rich & mighty criminals is put into
force .
2.
until death penalty is abolished, to make poly graph, lie detector
tests mandatory for all death convicts in a free & fair manner by a
neutral authority , to ascertain whether the convict is really guilty
or innocent of the alleged crime .

3.
until death penalty is abolished , to give a peaceful choice of
death to the death convicts like sleeping pill, injection, gun shot,
etc instead of medieval & barbaric " death by hanging".
4.

finally, to abolish death penalty from statuette books.

JAI HIND. VANDE MATARAM.


Your's sincerely,
Nagaraja. M. R.
Judge
Watch
Corruption, Immunity, Contempt &
Right to Information
The course of justice is often perverted by corruption within the judiciary and
indeed within the entire system of administration of justice. This is
exacerbated by the total lack of accountability of the higher judiciary including
the lack of any effective disciplinary mechanism, the self acquired protection
from even being investigated for criminal offences, the virtual immunity from
public criticism due to the law of contempt, and finally the immunity from
public scrutiny by another judicially created insulation from the Right to
Information Act.
Anti-poor Bias
The judicial system is increasingly used by the ruling establishment for pushing
through neo liberal policies by which resources such as land, water and public
spaces left with the poor and being increasingly appropriated by the rich and
the powerful. This elitist and anti poor bias makes the judicial system an
instrument for protecting and furthering the interest of the rich and powerful,
both Indian and foreign. This section will watch the judges and expose their
biases and any corrupt and arbitrary practices. They must see that the people
are scrutinizing them and their judgments carefully.
Submitting
Information
Judge Watch will contain information / analysis regarding any misconduct by a judge
as well as anything showing the anti-poor bias of a judge.
The campaign welcomes well researched information concerning judges from any
court. However, we cannot ensure that every dossier sent will be uploaded on this site
or made public. All submissions must be accompanied by the relevant/required
documents that may provide evidence in support of any allegations/observations
made against any judge or judicial officer.

One reference document is the "Restatement of Values of Judicial Life",a code of


conduct, adopted at a full court meeting of the Supreme Court on May 7, 1997 . The
Campaign does not subscribe to this as a complete document, but a starting point.
To send in information for the Judge Watch section please see the following
document. Judge Watch Format [Word, 20 KB]

Judge Watch on Justice V.Ramaswami


Name of Judge: Justice V.Ramaswami
Post Held at Relevant Time: Chief Justice of P&H High Court
Current Status: Rtd. Judge of Supreme Court of India
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
The first-ever impeachment motion against a SC judge, Justice V. Ramaswami,
was signed by 108 MPs in 1991. A year later, an inquiry found Ramaswami
guilty of willful and gross misuses of office While serving as the Chief
Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court. Ramaswami survived the
impeachment process as Parliament got divided along regional lines, southern
MPs strongly supported him. Only 196 members of Parliament, less than the
required two-thirds, voted for his ouster.
Additional documents in support of critique:
Motion of Impeachment - pdf (64 KB)
A Historic non-impeachment -)pdf (29.5 KB)
Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
If the critique is in respect of a judge please provide
a softcopy and/or hardcopy of the judgement
Judge Watch on Justice Madan Mohan Puchhi
Name of Judge: Justice Madan Mohan Punchhi
Rank: Former Chief Justice of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
This charge sheet was prepared by the Committee on Judicial Accountability in
1998, when Justice Punchhi was a judge of the Supreme Court of India. It was
signed by 25 MPs of Rajya Sabha. However, before it could get the signature of
the requisite number of 50 MPs of Rajya Sabha, Justice Punchhi was appointed
Chief Justice of India. After this, it became virtually impossible to get the

Notice of Motion signed by any MPs. Consequently, Notice of Motion could not
be presented to the Speaker. The imp lesson of this exercise was that it is very
difficult to get the MPs sign the impeachment motion unless three conditions
are satisfied. Firstly, the charges must be very serious; secondly they must be
provable by documentary evidence which is annexed to the Notice of Motion
and finally, the charges must have been given substantial publicity in the
media.
In the absence of all the three conditions been satisfied, MPs are afraid and
reluctant to sign a charge sheet against a sitting judge. It is normally
exceedingly difficult to get documentary evidence to prove charge against
sitting judge, particularly in the absence of a statutory investigation by an
agency having powers of investigation. Moreover, the bulk of the main stream
media is afraid to publicise charges against the sitting judge for fear of
contempt. In Ramaswamis case, the above three conditions were satisfied.
Documentary evidence was available against Ramaswami because of the report
of the Accountant General who audited the purchases made by Ramaswami as
Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court. This is why, impeachment of
judges, however corrupt they might be, is not a practical remedy in discipling
them.
Additional documents in support of critique:
Justice M.M.Punchhi - Notice of Motion - pdf (70 KB)
Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
If the critique is in respect of a judge please provide
a softcopy and/or hardcopy of the judgement
Judge Watch on Justice A. S. Anand
Name of Judge: Justice A.S.Anand
Rank: Former Chief Justice of India
Court: Supreme Court of India
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
Serious allegations of corruption and favouritism were raised against Justice
A.S.Anand former Chief Justice of India pertaining to the period when he was
the Judge and the Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.
These unrebutted allegations were supported by valid authentic documents and
were severely raised at the time when Justice Anand was the Chief Justice of
India but nothing was ever done in this regard.
Additional documents in support of critique:

Allegations aganist J. A.S.Anand - pdf (15.5 KB)


Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
If the critique is in respect of a judge please provide
a softcopy and/or hardcopy of the judgement
Judge Watch on Justice Vijendra Jain
Name of Judge: Justice Vijendra Jain
Post held at the relevant time: Judge at Delhi High Court
Currrent Status: Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
Justice Vijender Jain had decided a case of a litigant Hari Ram who was the
father-in-law of Justice Arun Kumar, Former Supreme Court Judge and a close
friend of Justice Vijendra Jain. They personally knew well enough to have Hari
Rams granddaughter married from his official residence. This is in violation of
one of the elements of the Code of Conduct or Restatement of Judicial
Values, adopted by the Full court in 1997 which says that no judge shall hear
and decide a case of his relative or friend. Even then Justice Vijendra Jain has
been recommended as Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court.
A complaint made by Subhash Agarwal against Justice Jain was rejected with no
formal reasons given but he was informally told that Justice Jain did not
personally know Hari Ram but since Hari Ram was the Father-in-law of Justice
Arun Kumar, a close friend of Justice Jain, Justice Jain agreed to lend his
residence for the wedding of Hari Rams granddaughter.
The Committee on Judicial Accountability wrote letters to the President and
Prime Minister of India and requested them to get all correspondences made by
the Complainant Subhash Agrawal to the Supreme Court in this regard.
Additional documents in support of critique:
Letters sent by Committee on Judicial Accountability
Letter to President 12.8.06 - pdf (8.03 KB)
Letter to Prime Minister-)pdf (6.24 KB)
Sunday Guardian web news article 28.11.10-)pdf (132 KB)
[The name of Justice Vijender Jain, even though clearly mentioned in the tape
has been withheld in this news item though the conversation itself makes it
very clear who the concerned judge is.]

Details of individual / organisation writing critique:


Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judge Watch on Justice Ashok Kumar
Name of Judge: Justice Ashok Kumar
Rank: Additional Judge
Court: High Court of Chennai
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
The case of Judge Ashok Kumar of Madras who was formerly a sessions judge
and has been given a permanent position in the Chennai High Court by the
Chief Justice of India in February 2007 is horrifying. When the complaints were
levelled against him of corruption, an inquiry report by the Intelligence Bureau
(IB) gave an even more horrendous report against him. But all the reports were
ignored and he was promoted to the High Court. This happened due to the
political pressure from the Central Government, as the judge was close to DMK
government (now ruling party of the State) and DMK government threatened to
withdraw support from the UPA government. So it is due to that, that the law
minister asked the CJI to give extensions and finally made Ashok Kumar a High
Court judge.
Additional documents in support of critique:
Petition on the appointment of Justice A.Kumar - pdf (51.6 KB)
SC order on Justice A.Kumar's case- pdf (7.9 KB)
Are CJIs following rules in appointment of Judges?-)pdf (6.93 KB)
Justice Ashok Kumar appoinment chalenged- pdf (10.0 KB)
Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
If the critique is in respect of a judge please provide
a softcopy and/or hardcopy of the judgement
Judge Watch on Justice Jagdish Bhalla
This is the case where the documentary evidence was available to show that the
judge has purchased the property worth crores in few lakhs in the name of his wife
from well-known criminal who have illegally grabbed the land. There were inquiry
reports of the Additional District Magistrate and Superintendent of Police which
attested to these facts. However, despite this documentary evidence being brought to
the notice of the then Chief Justice of India, he neither ordered an independent

investigation nor did he allow the Committee on Judicial Accountability to get a


regular FIR registered, so that a normal police investigation could have taken place.
This was despite the fact that under the in-house procedure, supposedly adopted by
the Supreme Court of India in 1999 for investigating charges against the judges, at
least an in-house committee of judges could have formed to investigate the charges
against Justice Bhalla. However instead of doing that, the then Chief Justice Y.K.
Sabbarwal recommended Justice Bhalla to be the Chief Justice of Kerala High Court.
His appointment as Chief Justice was stopped only because of the complaint made by
the Committee on Judicial Accountability to the President of India, who sent the
matter back to reconsideration to the Supreme Court collegium, which thereafter
could not reiterate its recommendation because of the opposition of one of the
judges of the collegium, Justice B.N.Aggarwal. However, thereafter Justice Bhalla has
been transferred as a judge of Chattisgarh High Court where he has been appointed as
acting Chief Justice by the notification of Law Ministry. This was despite of the
objection of the Committee on Judicial Accountability, that a judge, who was not
found suitable as Chief Justice of Kerala, cannot be appointed as Acting Chief Justice
of another High Court.
The case of Justice Bhalla demonstrates the hollowness of the so-called in-house
procedure supposedly adopted by the Supreme Court for investigating charges against
judges. It also demonstrates the pernicious impact of the Veraswami judgement which
prevents any police investigation against a judge without the prior permission of the
Chief Justice of India. The brotherhood among the judges and the fear among judges
that any criminal investigation against the sitting judge would tarnish the image of
Indian Judiciary has let to a situation whereby not a single sitting judge has been
subjected to criminal investigation in the 17 years since the Veeraswamy judgement.
Impeachment Motion and Press Releases
Press Release on the Proposed Elevation of Justice Bhalla - pdf (10.5 KB)
Impeachment Motion sent to Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha with explanatory
note- pdf (64.8 KB)
Press Release on the Motion of Impeachmentagainst Justice Bhalla - pdf
(42.8 KB)
Additional documents in support
Letter to President 12.4.07 JB - pdf (6.94 KB)
Letter to CJI 20.3.07 JB -)pdf (12 KB)
Letter for Consultation to President 3.2.07 JB - pdf (6.94 KB)
Application to register FIR against 1.11.06 JB - pdf (49.2 KB)
Complaint to Y.K.Sabarwal 12.7.06 JB - pdf (28.1 KB)

Details of individual / organisation writing critique:


Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Judge Watch on Justice Y.K.Sabharwal
Former CJI, Justice Y.K.Sabharwal set in motion the process of sealing of properties in
designated residential areas of Delhi which were being used for commercial purposes.
This sealing went on relentlessly under the continuous supervision of Chief Justice
Sabharwals bench, monitored and directed by a Court appointed monitoring
committee. When the government came up with a new master plan of Delhi 2021
which allowed mixed use and commercial activity in many of the areas which were
designated as residential, Justice Sabharwal orders on the sealing continued.
Some of the facts which were not publicly known was that his two sons, Chetan and
Nitin had entered into partnerships with big Mall and Commercial complex developers
and had become big Commercial complex developers themselves during that time. It
was clear that these orders were giving direct benefit to his sons business. His orders
are against the principles of natural justice, which say that no judge can hear a case
in which he is personally interested. There was a serious conflict of interest in this
case which renders his orders a nullity. It is in fact arguable that his dealing with this
case in such circumstances involves an offence under the Prevention of Corruption
Act.
At the same time, it was also found that several plots were allotted to the Companies
or relatives of Justice Sabharwal and which needs to be investigated to see if undue
favour was shown to them and if so whether there was any quid pro quo in terms of
judicial orders.
The facts thrown up in this case have very disturbing implications about the integrity
of our judiciary in the highest places.
Other Interventions
Justice Sabharwal's Defence Becomes Murkier: Stifling Public Exposure By
Using Contempt Powers -Press Release- pdf (41 KB)
Securing Judicial Accountability Freedom Of Speech vs. Contempt Towards
An Independent Judicial Commission by Prashant Bhushan - pdf (40 KB)
Shocking Abuse of Judicial Power; Hindu editorial; Sep 24,2007-pdf
(10.6KB)
Sabharwal on Trial; Times of India - pdf (28 KB)
Contept of Justice; Outlook online-pdf (85 KB)

Tehelka Investigation
Office of Profit: A Stink You Should Smell by Sanjay Dubey- pdf (35 KB)

Instead of helping shopkeepers, he made his sons rich- pdf (48 KB)
Silence Lies: Tehelka view by Shoma Chaudhary- pdf (138 KB)
"Wither Judicial Accountability? The case of Justice Sabharwal: Disquieting facts,
disturbing implications"- Press Conference held on Aug 03, 2007
Press Conference was organised to highlight a grave case of Judicial Misconduct at the
Apex of the Indian Judiciary. It disclosed how the then Chief Justice of India who had
spearheaded the sealing drive was mired in serious conflict of interest in as much as
his sons were deeply involved in the business of shopping malls and commercial
complexes who stood to benefit from this sealing drive. It was addressed by Shri
Shanti Bhushan, former Union Law Minister, Mr. Bhaskar Rao, Chairman, Centre for
Media Studies, and Mr. Prashant Bhushan, advocate, Supreme Court among other. The
Press Conference was attended by 40 news agencies and 80 participants.
Press Release - pdf (40.5 KB)
Supporting Documents - pdf (2.33 MB)
Mid-day Investigation
Mid Day articles - Lift kara de -pdf (74.3 KB)
It all squares up -pdf (80 KB)
Shock anger -pdf (100 KB)
Injustice - pdf (187 KB)
Gol Mall Hai - pdf (162 KB)
Affidavits filed Tayal.Vitusha
Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Committee on Judicial Accountability
Address: 66 Lawyers Chambers, Supreme Court of India, New Delhi
Post held at the relevant time: Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court
Current Status: Retd Chief Justice of India, Supreme Court
Judge Watch on Justice P. D. Dinakaran
FThe Supreme Court collegium headed by Chief Justice K G Balakrishnan and including
Justice S.H. Kapadia, Justice Tarun Chatterjee and Justice R.V. Raveendran had
recommended in August 2009, Justice P.D. Dinakaran, the Chief Justice of Karnataka
High Court, for elevation to the Supreme Court. The recommendations came along
with the names of four other Judges for elevation to the Apex court namely, Justice
AK Patnayak (Chief Justice of Madhya Pradesh High Court), Justice Tirath Singh
Thakur, (Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court), Justice SS Nijjar (Chief
Justice of Calcutta High Court) and Justice KS Radhakrishna ( Chief Justice of Gujarat
High Court). While the decks were cleared for the elevation of the latter four Judges,

iimmediately after the news of Justice Dinakarans proposed appointment became


known, a group of highly respected and responsible lawyers from Chennai called the
Forum for Judicial Accountability sent a series of representations to the Collegium and
the government detailing several very damaging allegations against him. These
included, acquiring more than 350 acres of agricultural land and encroaching on
another more than hundred acres of public land; acquiring properties benami and far
beyond his known sources of income; hearing and deciding cases of his friends etc. All
the allegations were backed by unimpeachable documentary evidence.
Though the Chief Justice of India, continued to back him, he ordered an inquiry into
the allegation regarding his agricultural land by the District Magistrate, who
confirmed the allegations including his encroachment of public land. Thereafter
Justice Dinakaran tried to destroy evidence and threatened the revenue officials who
went to stop this destruction of evidence. All this came to be widely reported in the
media. An embarrassed PMO forced a reluctant Law Minister Moily to return the
recommendation to the collegium for reconsideration. The collegium did not
withdraw the recommendation, but merely put it on hold. No in house inquiry was
ordered either.
Meanwhile people questioned how Dinakaran could continue as Chief Justice of
Karnataka in the light of such serious offences that he had committed. There was also
the demand that FIRs should be registered and the offences that he had committed be
investigated. The Chief Justice of India however did not give permission for
registering any FIR against Justice Dinakaran. This left no option but to initiate
impeachment proceedings against him. The Forum for Judicial Accountability
prepared the impeachment motion which was sent to all the political parties by a
campaign for signatures. Eventually 75 MPs of the Rajya Sabha, belonging to many
political parties except the Congress party signed the impeachment motion and
presented it to the Vice President. The motion was soon admitted by the Vice
President forcing Justice Dinakaran to stop discharging judicial functions.
The procedure laid down by the Judges Inquiry Act for proceeding with an
impeachment motion is that the Vice President appoints an enquiry committee
consisting of a sitting judge of the Supreme Court, a Chief Justice of a High Court and
a jurist to enquire into the charges against him. Only if the enquiry committee finds
him guilty does the matter proceed further for a voting in the two houses of
Parliament. The motion for his removal has to be then passed by a two third majority
in each house. Only then can he be removed. Though there is no requirement under
the Judges Inquiry Act for the Vice President to consult the Chief Justice in the choice
of members of the enquiry committee, he consulted the Chief Justice, who
recommended two judges of the Supreme Court and two Chief Justices of the High
Court. Based on the Chief Justices advice, the Vice President has appointed an
inquiry committee comprising of Justice V.S. Sirupurkar of the Supreme Court, Chief
Justice A.R. Dave of the A.P. High Court and Shri P.P. Rao as the jurist.
The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform as well as the Forum for Judicial
Accountability have however written to the V.P. pointing out that Justice Sirupurkar
has not only been a close friend and colleague of Justice Dinakaran, but he has also
prejudged the issue, telling several responsible lawyers that he knows Justice
Dinakaran well and that he is an independently wealthy and honourable man.

Moreover, Shri P.P. Rao had been formally consulted by Justice Dinakaran on how he
should deal with these charges and that he had advised him on the matter. In these
circumstances, they would not be seen to be impartial and therefore should not sit as
judges on this inquiry committee to avoid damage to the credibility of the inquiry and
further controversy. However till the date of writing they have not yet recused
themselves.
Representations by the Forum for Judicial Accountability to the Collegium
Representation 1 against Mr.Justice P.D.Dinakaran, Chief Justice, Karnataka
High Court - amassing of huge assets, corruption and serious
irregularities.- pdf
Representation 2, Further particulars with supporting materials regarding
Mr. Justice P.D.Dinakaran, Chief Justice of Karnataka- pdf
Representation 3, Details of more acquisitions by Justice P.D.Dinakaran-pdf
Representation 4, Details of more acquisitions and improper judicial
conduct of Justice P.D.Dinakaran.- pdf
Motion for Impeachement of Justice Dinakaran
The notice of motion for presenting an address to the President of India for the
removal of Justice Dinakaran, Chief Justice of the Karanataka High Court, under
Article 217 read with Article 124(4) of Constitution of India for his various acts of
misbehavior, including dishonest judicial orders, irregular and dishonest
administrative actions, etc, along with an explanatory note on the motion for
impeachement. pdf
Press Statement against Survery of India probe into Justice Dinakaran
encroachment
Press Statement issued by the Forum for Judicial Accountability against the Survey
of India spot probe into the allegations of land encroachment by the Karnataka
Chief Justice, P.D. Dinakaran, to be conducted on December 30th 2009 as
reported in a newspaper.
The Forum calls upon the Central Government to recall the three member team
deputed by the Survey of India immediately and to await the outcome of the
enquiry under the impeachment proceedings. ...statement page 1 statement page
2
CJAR letter to the Vice President regarding the enquiry committee in the Justice
Dinakaran impeachment
The Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform has sent a letter to Shri Hamid
Ansari, Vice President of India, regarding the 3 member enquiry committee appointed
to enquire into the motion for removal of Jusitce P.D. Dinakaran. The letter brings to
Shri Ansari's notice that Justice Sirupurkars friendship with Justice Dinakaran,
coupled with his prejudgement of the matter, places him in a position where if he
inquires into this matter, justice will not be seen to be done. The same would be the
case with Shri P.P. Rao who has been formally consulted in the matter by Justice
Dinakaran. The letter further requests that these facts be placed before Justice

Sirupurkar and Shri P.P. Rao and they be asked whether they would like to recuse
themselves from the inquiry committee, to avoid any further controversy in the
matter. psdf
Articles
Extraordinary situations call for extraordinary measures -Justice D Y
Shylendra Kumar pdf
The Dinakaran Imbroglio: Appointments and Complaints against Judges - Mr.
Prashant Bhushan pdf
Details of individual / organisation writing critique:
Name: Campaign for Judicial Accountability and Reform
Address: 6/6 Jungpura B (basement), Mathura Road, New Delhi: 110014
Post held at the relevant time: Chief Justice, Karnataka High Court
Current Status: Chief Justice, Karanataka High Court
Judge Watch on Justice F.I.Rebello
Name of Judge: Justice F. I. Rebello
Post Held at Relevant Time: Chief Justice of Allahabad High Court
Current Status: Chief Justice, Allahabad High Court
Analysis/Comment/Critique:
Justice Rebello, son after joining as the Chief justice of Allahabad High Court
met Ms Mayawati, Chief Minister of Uttar Pradesh. He, then issued
administrative orders to change the classification of the case related to Ms
Mayawati's involvement in Taj Corridor's case. As a result, the case, which was
part heard by a different bench was transfered to a completely new bench.
This was allegedly done to benefit Ms Mayawati.
Additional documents in support of critique:
CJAR's complaint against Justice Rebello- pdf
Judicial
Accountability

It is
important to keep the judiciary in the purview of scrutiny. This section will provide
various subjects to get judiciary accountable to common person.
Appointments
Making reference to the K. Veeraswamys Case Shri Shanti Bhushan observed that all
judges should declare their assets it should be done with pride! Why raise issues of
self-respect? He said only those who have something to hide will be reluctant to
disclose their assets! more

- S.P.Gupta - pdf (1.6 MB)


A seven Judges Bench of Supreme Court extensively considered the issues of
Independence of Judiciary in relation to the appointment and transfer of Judges, the
issue of appointment of the Additional Judges of the High Court, the issue of the
privilege of the Government against disclosure of State documents and the scope of
judicial review of the powers exercised by the President.
While deciding the issue of the locus standi of the petitioning lawyers who had
challenged the Circular of the Law Minister and short-term extensions of Additional
Judges on ground of attack on the independence of the judiciary, Justice P.N.
Bhagwati while upholding their right to do so held that where the effected persons
are really helpless, the Supreme Court will not insist on a regular writ petition to be
filed by the public spirited individual espousing their cause. The Court will readily
respond even to a letter addressed by said individual espousing the public cause.
A bunch of cases were decided together in the present case which were raised in two
batches of writ petitions filed in different High Courts which were transferred under
Article 139-A to the Supreme Court since they raised common issues of great
constitutional importance. One writ was also filed in the Supreme Court. Several more
related issues were raised and discussed during the hearing. Each of the Judges
delivered a separate judgment.
- Supreme Court Advocates-on-Record Association Vs. Union of India
- pdf (475 KB)
This case directed to constitute a Bench of nine Judges to examine the two questions
referred therein, namely, the position of the Chief Justice of India with reference to
primacy, and justiciability of fixation of Judge strength.
Impeachment
Article 124 (4) of Indian Consitution: A Judge of the Supreme Court shall not be
removed from his office except by an order of the President passed after an address
by each House of Parliament supported by a majority of the total membership of that
House and by a majority of not less than two-thirds of the members of that House
present and voting has been presented to the President in the same session for such
removal on the ground of proved misbehaviour or incapacity.
- Justice V. Ramaswamy - pdf (64 KB)
The first-ever impeachment motion against a SC judge, Justice V. Ramaswami, was
signed by 108 MPs in 1991. A year later, an inquiry found Ramaswami guilty of willful
and gross misuses of office While serving as the Chief Justice of the Punjab and
Haryana High Court. Ramaswami survived the impeachment process as Parliament
got divided along regional lines, southern MPs strongly supported him. Only 196
members of Parliament, less than the required two-thirds, voted for his ouster.
A Historic Non-impeachement - pdf (29.5 KB)
- Justice M.M. Punchi - pdf (70 KB)
This charge sheet was prepared by the Committee on Judicial Accountability in 1998,
when Justice Punchhi was a judge of the Supreme Court of India. It was signed by 25

MPs of Rajya Sabha. However, before it could get the signature of the requisite
number of 50 MPs of Rajya Sabha, Justice Punchhi was appointed Chief Justice of
India. After this, it became virtually impossible to get the Notice of Motion signed by
any MPs. Consequently, Notice of Motion could not be presented to the Speaker. The
imp lesson of this exercise was that it is very difficult to get the MPs sign the
impeachment motion unless three conditions are satisfied. Firstly, the charges must
be very serious; secondly they must be provable by documentary evidence which is
annexed to the Notice of Motion and finally, the charges must have been given
substantial publicity in the media.
In the absence of all the three conditions been satisfied, MPs are afraid and reluctant
to sign a charge sheet against a sitting judge. It is normally exceedingly difficult to
get documentary evidence to prove charge against sitting judge, particularly in the
absence of a statutory investigation by an agency having powers of investigation.
Moreover, the bulk of the main stream media is afraid to publicise charges against the
sitting judge for fear of contempt. In Ramaswamis case, the above three conditions
were satisfied. Documentary evidence was available against Ramaswami because of
the report of the Accountant General who audited the purchases made by Ramaswami
as Chief Justice of Punjab and Haryana High Court. This is why, impeachment of
judges, however corrupt they might be, is not a practical remedy in discipling them.
- Justice A.S. Anand - pdf (15.5 KB)
Serious allegations of corruption and favouritism were raised against Justice
A.S.Anand former Chief Justice of India pertaining to the period when he was the
Judge and the Chief Justice of the Jammu and Kashmir High Court.
Read more
articles..
conflict between law and morality - pdf (10 KB)
Contempt

-A

- Conte
mpt of court: judgement by Justice Arijit Pasayat -pdf (26.5 KB) - Contempt of
court: judgement by Justice Raveendran - pdf (24.1 KB) - Judges in their own
cause: Contempt of court by Prashant Bhushan-pdf (19.2 KB) - Contempt of court:
need for a second look by J.Markandey Katju - pdf (12.5 KB) - Standing Committee
report on Contempt - pdf (58.4 KB) - Affidavits of Arundhati Roy pdf (24.2 KB) and
Medha Patkar on contempt pdf (17.0 KB)
Right to Information and
Judiciary
- Right
to Information And The Judiciary By Prashant Bhushan - pdf (72 KB)
Investigations against
Judges
- Justice K. Veeraswamy - pdf (177 KB)
Justice K.Veeraswamy the then Chief Justice of Madras High Court was charged for
possession of assets disproportionate to his known sources of income and a case was

filed against him by the CBI under the Prevention of Corruption Act. The High Court of
Madras dismissed his Petition for quashing of the Case against him and referred the
matter to the Supreme Court for deciding certain questions of law. The Supreme
Court while deciding the case against the delinquent Judge laid down strict guidelines
to protect the independence of Judiciary according to which no F.I.R. can be
registered against a Judge or Chief Justice of the High Court, or a Judge of the
Supreme Court without the sanction of the Chief Justice of India in the matter. It was
held that the Supreme Court is not a court of limited jurisdiction of only dispute
settling, and that the court has been a law maker and it is the courts responsibility
and duty to apply the existing law in a form more conducive to the independence of
the judiciary. It was also said that any complaint against a Judge and its investigation
by the CBI, if given publicity will have a far reaching impact on the judge and the
litigant public therefore there is need of a judicious use of taking action under the
Prevention of Corruption Act.
- Judicial Accountability OR Illusion - The National Judicial Council Bill by Prashant
Bhushan - pdf (8.83 KB)
- Judicial Accountability by Prashant Bhushan - pdf (9.61 KB)
- Mechanisms of Judicial Accountability by Justice J.S.Verma - pdf (11.2 KB)

Judicial
Reforms
The
current judicial system needs to be cleared of procedural complexities and hurdles to
make it accessible for the common citizens. It must be strengthened to deliver justice
quickly, efficiently and honestly. This section contains links and updates on various
laws and policies (existing and proposed) and an analysis of the same.
Access of Poor and Delays in Justice
Who do these delays and backlogs impact the most? How do they impact access to
justice? In case of the criminal cases, the poor people are the most affected. More
than 70% of persons inside jails who are held on suspicion of having committed a
crime are not able to pay the bail amount, which is very high. They are inside the
jails for months and years, as they cannot afford a lawyer. more
Values and Attitude towards the poor
Labour
After independence, the concept of social justice was introduced and the
labour law developed more as a judgment law. There were various laws but
with the intervention of judiciary, the labour law was moving in a progressive
direction. The issues concerning the labour matters such as wage, minimum
wage, fair wage, employment security, social security, etc. were initiated,

right from the Express Newspapers case.more


Urban Poor
One broad category of urban poor is the slum dwellers living in unorganized
housing sector, having occupation of street vendors, rickshaw pullers, etc. This
is the section, which has suffered the maximum onslaught of judicial decision
in the recent past. more
Rural Poor
This debate is quite crucial, which is reminiscent of what happened with
judiciary during the period when India was trying to abolish Zamindari system
and introduce land reforms. While reflecting on the judiciary and its impact on
the rural poor, the most popular analysis is the class analysis but one should not
confine to it alone, one should also consider caste analysis. We must also
remember the indigenous people. more
Public Interest Litigation
It is important to discuss about the reasons for developing a tool like Public
Interest Litigation and how it has transformed recently. While criticizing
judiciary one must not forget about the executive inactions of last ten years
and the recent laws passed by the legislature. It is necessary to substantiate by
two examples, one is aquaculture case which permitted the multinational
corporations to have their aquaculture activities at the cost of the traditional
fishermen. more

Is CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA above LAW ???


https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/chief-justice-above-law ,
Law student sexually harassed by ex-Supreme Court judge: case is not unique,
but speaking out is nearly impossible
http://www.legallyindia.com/201311114099/Interviews/sexual-harassmentsupreme-court-is-common ,
HANG RAPIST CORRUPT JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/hang-rapist-corrupt-judges

Nothing but the truth


By Indira Jaising
A midst the rising din of the demand for death penalty for rapists comes the news that
three judges of the Karnataka High Court have been involved in what has come to be
described as a 'sex scandal' on the outskirts of Mysore at a place called Roost Resorts.
Our attention is now directed to those who dispense justice rather than those who knock
at the doors of justice. In both cases, we are talking about the use and abuse of women
those who are victims of sexual abuse, and those who are used as sexual objects,
willingly or unwillingly.
After the reports in local newspapers that three high court judges were found with
women at a resort, there was the usual crop of denials. Although the Mysore police
were called in to settle a brawl, on being told that the persons in question were judges
they said that they heard no evil and saw no evil.
And everyone thought the matter ended there.
Attempts to get the names of the judges or of the women in question drew a blank. The
bar association also drew a blank as most people said, "Don't quote me but"
On November 30, the Bangalore edition of The Times of India published a front-page
story giving the names and photographs of the three judges and confirming that the
Intelligence Bureau had done an investigation and come to the conclusion that the
incident had indeed occurred. There were still no details of the incident, though it was
stated that the report has been given to the chief justice of India.
There were reports on the same day that the Karnataka High Court chief justice had
sought the transfer of the three judges to Patna, Jammu and Kashmir and Guwahati.
Apparently, the chief justice has agreed to this request and the transfer orders have
been issued.
Then came the news that the chief justice of India has set up a committee of inquiry
under the 'in-house' procedure consisting of the chief justice of the Andhra Pradesh
High Court, the chief justice of the Madras High Court and the chief justice of the Patna
High Court.
There were still no details in the press about the actual incident and the entire episode
continued to be referred to as a 'sex scandal'.
What is interesting about these reports is not what they reveal, but what they conceal. It
is a conspiracy of silence. If the information is now available to the chief justice of India,
why is it not being made public? Do we, the public, not have the right to information?
Ironically, the morning newspapers brought the news that the Freedom of Information
Act has been passed. What are the legitimate limits of the right to freedom of
information and the requirement of keeping information a secret? This episode would
make an interesting case study.
What exactly is at stake here? There is much that should concern the nation about the
incident. This is not a case about the private morality of the judges, be that as it may,
but about the abuse of office that they hold. What has not been made known is that the
three women in question are women lawyers practising in their courts.
What is at stake here is the pollution of the stream of justice at its very source. There
must be countless cases in which these women appeared before these very judges day
in and day out of their routine practice. Can one honestly say that in such a situation

justice is being done "without fear or favour"? Judges swear on oath of allegiance to
"bear true faith" to the Constitution and do justice "without fear or favour". How well
have these judges honoured this oath?
What is at stake here is the cynical use of women as sexual commodities. The usual
justifications have already begun making the rounds. If the women have not
complained, what objection can anyone else have, it is asked. What is lost sight of is the
fact that the judges are in a position of dominance vis--vis the women, in a position to
do favours that pertain to their office.
What is at stake here is the cynical use of public office, the seat of justice, for personal
petty gain. It is irrelevant whether the women consented or not. The usual blame game
will now begin blaming the victim rather than the perpetrator; the usual loose talk
about the character of the woman in question; the usual attempt to cover up by diverting
attention from the actual incident to the motives of those who brought the incident to
light.
What is at stake here is the perception of women as sexual commodities by those who
are responsible for sitting in judgment over cases brought for and on behalf of women.
The issues at stake here concern one half of Indians. With what faith can Indian women
approach the courts demanding the right to equality, the right to be free from sexual
harassment or rape and the right to live with dignity, if the persecution of judges who sit
in judgment over them is non-negotiable?
In the circumstances, the suggested solution is worse than the offence to transfer
them to Patna, Guwahati and Jammu and Kashmir. Why these particular cities? Are
they not an integral part of the country, or are they mere islands within the country that
are considered 'punishment postings' where people are sent a la 'crossing Kala Pani' of
the old days? To the credit of the Guwahati Bar Association, it protested against the
proposed transfer.
The only decent thing to do is for the chief justice of India to disclose full details of the
incident so that rumour-mongering comes to an end. This would be in the best interest
of the judiciary itself.
As things stand, the rumours are making the rounds that there were more than three
judges involved, that the women were professional call girls, many of which are
baseless. We, the people, have the right to know. The conspiracy of silence must be
broken.
The judges in question must neither be assigned any judicial functions pending an
inquiry nor be transferred to sit in judgment over others. Two of the judges are stated to
be additional judges. They must not be confirmed. If there is prima facie evidence
against the one remaining judge, the chief justice must recommend his impeachment.
It is time for all concerned bar associations, bar councils and other male-dominated
bodies of legal professionals to act and ensure that there is no cover-up. There is little
point in showing sympathy to women in judgments and in seminar rooms, or in
recommending the death penalty for rape if we cannot deal with the men who dispense
justice.
There are contempt of court petitions pending in the Karnataka High Court against
some of the publications for disclosing details of the incident. Civil society and women's
organisations must demand that justice is now done when it comes to the judges
themselves.

The law of contempt can offer no solution to the crisis of credibility in the judiciary that
this incident has thrown up. One positive aspect of the incident is that it is only after the
chief justice of the high court issued a public notice inviting information that he received
20 representations, which led to the discovery of the truth.
Let the truth now be made public.

Judge accused of molesting 2 rape survivors in UP


A sitting judicial magistrate sexually assaulted them
UP: Two rape victims claim that a sitting judicial magistrate sexually assaulted them.
The girls
alleged that when they went to the magistrates chamber to give their statement, he
allegedly
made them strip and molested them.
One of the girls is a minor and the police have filed a complaint. The girls also claimed
that the
judge threatened them to not speak of the incident to anyone.
Lawyers and the general public in Gonda launched a protest against the judge.
JUDGE SENDING OBSCENE SMS TO WOMEN
Lucknow Taking cognisance of the allegation against a civil Judge (junior
division) of
Budaun court that he sent obscene SMSes to a woman lecturer, the Registrar
General of
Allahabad High Court today sought a report from the district judge into the
matter.
The civil judge of Gunnor sub-division court of Budaun Pramod Kumar
Gangwar was
accused of sending obscene SMSes from his cellphone to a woman lecturer of
Classic
College of Law, Bareilly. A lecturer of the same college, Vivek Gupta, was named
in the FIR
lodged by the victim while Gangwars name surfaced in the primary investigation.

Registrar General Dinesh Gupta said, The district judge of Budaun has been
asked to
send a detailed report into the allegations. Appropriate action would be taken on
the basis
of the report.
District Judge Suresh Kumar Srivastava said, I have asked the Bareilly district
police to
send a report about the matter. The report on the basis of the police inquiry would
be sent
to the Allahabad High Court Registrar General.
I am not aware about the matter, as the Bareilly police did not intimate me before
initiating
the probe against the civil judge. They should have informed me when they had
received
any such complaint, the judge added.
Meanwhile, Bareilly CO II Raj Kumar, who is investigating the case, today
recorded the
statement of the victim. I have collected the call details of the cellphone used for
sending
the SMSes, but I have yet to get the address of the person who is subscriber of
the SIM
card, he said.
The probe is on to verify if the accused in the case were present on the location
recorded
in the call details when the SMSes were sent. The details of the findings of the
investigation would be sent to the Budaun district court to seek the direction,
the CO
added.
Asked if the investigation was earlier conducted into the matter, Raj Kumar said,
The SP
(Crime) had initiated probe into the matter, but I am not aware if the investigation
had
reached to any conclusion.
The woman lecturer had lodged an FIR at the Mahila police station on Thursday
alleging
she had received obscene SMSes on her cellphone involving her colleague Vivek
Gupta.

The preliminary inquiry into the case by the police yesterday had found that the
mobile
phone used in the crime belongs to the civil judge.

Lokayukta: DC demanded sex from widow

In the midst of a national outrage over former Haryana DGP SPS Rathore molesting a
teenager,
the Karnataka Lokayukta on Saturday made a startling revelation that the state
government was
shielding a top bureaucrat who had demanded sexual favours from a young widow.
Lokayukta Justice Santosh Hegde disclosed that the official concerned, who was the
deputy
commissioner of one of the districts when he demanded sex from the widow in return for
discharging his duties as public servant, has since been promoted to a senior position.
Justice Hegde, in the course of an interaction with journalists at the Deccan Herald
office
Saturday afternoon, said the unnamed widow had dared the deputy commissioner and
approached the Lokayuktas office with a complaint against the officer.
On examination of the complaint, the Lokayukta had found sufficient grounds to
recommend to
the state government the suspension and prosecution of the DC concerned. The
recommendation was subsequently considered by the concerned department head as
well as
the chief secretary and both endorsed it.
But, according to Justice Hegde, no action was initiated against the DC as the same
official who
had endorsed the recommendation subsequently found no basis for initiating
departmental action
against him. Instead, the official cleared the DCs name for promotion in the superscale.
Presently, the official holds a senior position in the government.
The widow, in her late 20s, had approached the DC with a representation to sort out
some
problems. But she was shocked when the DC demanded sex.

Justice Hegde did not identify the official in question or the complainant. Nor did he offer
to name
the district where the official was serving as deputy commissioner. But the incident has
happened sometime in the course of last three years as Justice Hegde took over as the
Lokayukta in mid-2006.
3-year jail term for dirty judge
Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhise attempted to get sexual favours from a
housewife in
1997
Family court judge Ramrao Gangaram Bhises attempts to extract sexual favours, in
addition to a
bribe, from a housewife, Alka Gaikwad who had sought an increase in her monthly
maintenance allowance from her estranged husband, in 1997 proved costly to him.
Pronouncing him guilty on both counts, the special court hearing anti-corruption bureau
(ACB)
matters sentenced him to three years rigorous imprisonment and a collective fine of
Rs55, 000,
on Monday.
According to the FIR in the case registered against Bhise by the ACB, Suryakant
Gaikwad had
filed for divorce from his wife, Alka, before the Bandra family court. Alka, a housewife, in
turn,
filed a petition seeking mutual cohabitation with her husband. The then family court
judge, Meera
Khadakkar, directed the husband to pay her an interim maintenance allowance of
Rs750 per
month.
Subsequently, in January 1997, Alka filed another application before the same family
court (now
presided over by Bhise) seeking to increase the monthly maintenance amount to
Rs3,500. On
October 27, 1997, Bhise issued an interim order, increasing the maintenance allowance
to
Rs2,000 to be paid by Suryakan to his estranged wife till the disposal of the case.
Immediately

after issuing the order, Bhise asked Alka to meet him and gave her his residential
telephone
number, asking her to call him when the court hours ended. He told her that he would
ask her
husband to pay her a lump sum of Rs2 lakh in addition to the monthly maintenance,
provided she
called him up, the FIR states.
When she called up the judge at 7 pm the same day, Bhise told her that she would have
to pay
him a sum of Rs2,000 in addition to granting his sexual favours if she wanted an order
in her
favour. He also directed her to meet him at the Haji Ali bus stop with the bribe amount
the
following evening.
Alka approached the ACB, which sought permission from the Chief Justice of the
Bombay High
Court before laying a trap on the first class judicial magistrate (Bhise). The HC while
granting the
permission designated a court official to bear witness to the events leading to the trap.
Alka,
under video camera surveillance of ACB sleuths, along with the court official and other
women
witnesses met Bhise at 8.30 pm at the Haji Ali bus stop. Bhise took hold of Alkas wrist
and when
she protested, repeated his demands, the FIR states.
Alka was then taken to a nearby hotel, Sharda, where the judge accepted the bribe
amount. But
before he could do anything else, ACB sleuths swooped in and arrested him.

Rajasthan judge is indicted for seeking sexual favours


Chief Justice of India G B Pattanaik retires tonight and he doesnt have much to write
home about
on the unprecedented drive he launched to enforce judicial accountability.
After the PPSC scam fiasco, reported in The Indian Express today, comes the case of
the

Rajasthan judge who has been indicted in a sex scandal and yet has escaped action
pending
another inquiry.
On December 14, a three-judge committee set up by Pattanaik confirmed the
involvement of
Justice Arun Madan of the Rajasthan High Court in a proposition to a woman doctor to
have sex
with him in exchange for a judicial favour.
The committee, headed by the Chief Justice of the Punjab and Haryana High Court
Justice B K
Roy, submitted its report to Pattanaik, indicting Madan on a complaint made from
Jodhpur by the
woman concerned, Sunita Malviya.
But Pattanaik has not announced any action against Madan. When contacted by The
Indian
Express, Pattanaik confirmed that the committee had indicted Madan and his bad
reputation in
seeking sexual favours in return for judicial ones.
However, Pattanaik said that no action was being taken since the committee had also
mentioned
allegations of corruption against Madan. And so he had ordered a further inquiry by the
same
committee into the corruption charges.
When asked what he did with the indictment of Madan in the sex scandal, Pattanaik
said, That
is on hold because I could not have taken piecemeal action against him.I am praying
to God
that the final report will give some tangible material to take action.
Highly placed sources told The Indian Express that when the committee recorded
statements last
week in Jodhpur of about 30 persons over four days, it also came to know of several
allegations
of corruption against Madan and another judge of the same high court. The committee
put these
on record as well.
Pattanaik said that when he summoned Madan to New Delhi last week, he did not raise
the sex

scandal issue and instead limited himself to saying that he was ordering a further inquiry
into
corruption allegations.
In effect, Pattanaik has now passed the Rajasthan buck to his successor Justice V N
Khare.
The gist of Malviyas complaint is that Madan made a sexual proposition to her in
October
through a deputy registrar of the high court, Govind Kalwani, who said that the judge
would help
her, in turn, get out of a criminal case booked against her.
With this, Pattanaiks much-touted in-house judicial accountability seems to have hit a
wall. The
first committees report into the PPSC scam exonerated one judge despite evidence
and let two
others off with a mere slap on the wrist. The third committee is now busy probing the
involvement
of judges in the Mysore sex scam.

Ten reasons why criminals in khaki get away


Siddharth Varadarajan
Behind every man like S.P.S. Rathore who abuses his authority stand the generals and
footsoldiers who help and support him. We need to take them all down.
S.P.S. Rathore, the criminal former top cop of Haryana, may appear alone today but we
must
never forget that he was able to get away with the sexual molestation of a young child
and the
illegal harassment of her family for 19 years because he had hundreds of men who
supported
him in his effort to evade justice.
The fact that these men fellow police officers, bureaucrats, politicians, lawyers,
judges, school
administrators were willing to bend the system to accommodate a man accused of
molesting a
minor speaks volumes for the moral impoverishment of our establishment and country.
Decent

societies shun those involved in sexual offences against children. Even criminals jailed
for
`ordinary' crimes like murder treat those serving time for molesting children as beyond
the pale.
But in India, men like Rathore have their uses for their masters, so the system circles its
wagons
and protects them.
The CBI's appeal may lead to the enhancement of Rathore's sentence and perhaps
even the
slapping of abetment to suicide charges, since his young victim killed herself to put an
end to the
criminal intimidation her family was being subjected to by Rathore and his men. But the
systemic
rot which the case has exposed will not be remedied unless sustained public pressure is
put on
Prime Minister Manmohan Singh and Union Home Minister P. Chidambaram, two men
who have
it in their power to push for simple remedies in the way the Indian law enforcement and
justice
delivery system works.
First, abolish the need for official, i.e. political sanction to prosecute bureaucrats,
policemen and
security forces personnel when they are accused of committing crimes. The original
intent behind
this built-in stay-out-of-jail card was to protect state functionaries from acts done in the
course of
discharging their duties in good faith. Somewhere along the line, this has come to mean
protecting our custodians of law and order when they murder innocent civilians (eg. the
infamous
Panchalthan case in Kashmir where the trial of army men indicted by the CBI for
murdering five
villagers in 2000 still cannot take place because the Central government will not grant
permission), or assault or molest women and children. No civilised, democratic society
grants
such impunity. It is disgusting to see former officials and bureaucrats from Haryana
saying how
they had wanted Rathore prosecuted but were prevented from doing so because of
pressure.

Such officials should either be made formally to testify in a criminal case against the
politicians
who so pressured them or they should themselves be hauled up for perverting the
course of
justice.
Second, stop talking about how making the police and army answerable to the law will
somehow
demoralise their morale. Does anybody care about the morale of ordinary citizens any
more? Or
the morale of upright police and army officers, who do not think it is right for their
colleagues to be
able to get away with criminal acts?
Third, bring an end to the cosy relationship between the police and politicians. Rathore
was
protected by four chief ministers of Haryana. He served them and they served him by
ensuring
his unfettered rise. It is absurd that the Indian Police is still governed by a colonial-era
Act dating
back to 1861. A number of commissions have made recommendations for reforming the
police
over the years; but no government or political party wants to give up its ability to use
and misuse
the police for their own benefit
Fourth, ensure that police officers who abuse their authority and engage in mala fide
prosecutions are dismissed from service and sentenced to jail for a long period of time.
Mr.
Chidambaram should use the considerable resources at his command to find out who
were the
policemen involved in filing 11 bogus cases against the teenaged brother of the young
girl
Rathore molested. He should then make sure criminal proceedings are initiated against
all of
them. The message must go out to every policeman in the country: If you abuse the law
at the
behest of a superior, you will suffer legal consequences.
Fifth, ensure that criminal charges against law enforcement personnel are fast-tracked
as a
matter of routine so that a powerful defendant is not able to use his position to delay
proceedings

the way Rathore did for years on end. The destruction or disappearance of material
evidence in
such cases must be treated as a grave offence with strict criminal liability imposed on
the
individual responsible for breaking the chain of custody.
Sixth, empower the National Human Rights Commission with teeth so that police
departments
and state governments cannot brush aside their orders as happened in the Rathore
case. This
would also require appointing to the NHRC women and men who have a proven record
of
defending human rights in their professional life, something that is done today only in
the breach.
The attitude of the Manmohan Singh government to this commission and others like the
National
Commission for Women (NCW) and National Commission for Minorities is shocking.
Vacancies
are not filled for months on end.
Seventh, ensure the early enactment of pending legislation broadening the ambit of
sexual
crimes, including sexual crimes against children. Between rape, defined as forced
penetrative
sex, and the vague, Victorian-era crime of `outraging the modesty of a woman', the
Indian Penal
Code recognises no other form of sexual violence. As a result, all forms of sexual
molestation
and assault short of rape attract fairly lenient punishment, of the kind Rathore got. In his
case, the
judge did not even hand down the maximum sentence, citing concerns for the criminal's
age.
Sadly, he did not take into account the age of the victim and neither does the IPC, which
fails to
distinguish between `outraging the modesty' of an adult woman and a young child.
A draft law changing these provisions and bringing India into line with the rest of the
modern
world has been pending with the NCW and Law Ministry for years. Perhaps the
government may
now be shamed into pushing it through Parliament at the earliest.

Eighth, take steps to introduce a system of protection of witnesses and complainants.


The fate
that the family of Rathore's young victim had to endure is testament to the fact that
people who
seek justice in India do so at their own peril.
Ninth, ensure that robust interrogation techniques like narco-analysis, which are
routinely used
against other alleged criminals, are also employed against police officers accused of
crimes.
Tenth, the media and the higher judiciary must also turn the light inward and ask
themselves
whether they were also derelict in their duty. The Rathore case did not attract the kind of
constant
media attention it deserved, nor do other cases involving serving police officers accused
of
crimes against women, workers, peasants and minorities. As for the upper courts, their
record is
too patchy to inspire confidence. It was, after all, the high court which chose to
disregard the
CBI's request for including abetment to suicide charges.
Keywords: Siddharth Varadarajan, S.P.S. Rathore, criminals, khaki, former DGP of
Haryana, custodians, sexual violence, NHRC

Porbandar judge accused of dowry harassment


A complaint has been filed against District and Sessions judge of Porbandar for
allegedly
harassing his daughter-in-law for dowry, police said here on Sunday.
Darshana Dave, a native of Amreli, has filed a complaint against her husband Kinnar,
father-inlaw
and district judge Arvind Dave, mother-in-law Pratibha and brother-in-law Prashant, the
police added.
Darshana married Kinnar two years ago. Her complaint says that she was harassed
from the
beginning, and was even beaten up by the husband and in-laws, who were demanding
Rs 10
lakh as dowry.

She has also alleged that she was thrown out of the house a few months back, and her
husband
is now seeking divorce, the police said.
Amreli Superintendent of Police H R Muliyana confirmed to have received the complaint
against
the judge and others. He said that action will be taken after verifying the complaint.
This is the second complaint related to dowry harassment filed against a judge in the
state in the
recent past.
Earlier, a woman had filed a complaint against additional sessions judge of Jetpur after
her
daughter and the judge's wife committed suicide.

Gurgaon judge to also face dowry harassment charge


Gurgaon's Chief Judicial Magistrate Ravneet Garg, booked for the murder of his wife,
will also
face dowry harassment charge, police here said Monday.
Police have issued notices to the CJM's father K.K. Garg and mother Rachna Garg,
who have
also been named in the dowry harassment case.
The CJM's father reached here Monday morning from Haryana's Panchkula town and
contacted
police, who wanted to question him.
"We had called CJM's parents...K.K. Garg was questioned by special investigation team
(SIT),"
Gurgaon Police Commissioner Alok Mittal said.
Mittal said on the basis of written complaint filed by the parents of the CJM's wife
Geetanjali,
penal sections of dowry harassment and extra-marital affair were included in the FIR
lodged
against the CJM Saturday.
Geetanjali, 24, bore three bullet wounds - on her chin, chest and stomach - but no
bullets were
found in her body that was recovered here Thursday. The CJM's licensed firearm was
found near

the body, police said.


Mittal said two bullets were seized from the scene of crime and would be sent for
ballistic
examination Monday, a day after ballistic experts examined the crime spot.
"The SIT Sunday questioned two women relatives of Ravneet Garg for hours at his
government
allotted house here in the Officers Colony," said Mittal.
"We have asked CJM to produce supporting evidences to prove his statement," he said.
The CJM allegedly said that his driver and domestic help may throw some light on his
wife's
death.
Judge Garg's in-laws alleged that two cars were provided to the accused on his and his
family's
demand. Rs.2 lakh were also delivered to him at the time of the admission of his
daughters in
school in May.
Geetanjali's brother Pradeep Aggarwal Saturday lodged a first information report against
Garg
and his parents, accusing them of murder.
"Ravneet and Geetanjali got married in November 2007. Everything was fine for a few
years but
the attitude of Ravneet and his parents towards Geetanjali started changing after she
delivered
two baby girls (now aged around four and a half and three years)," Aggarwal said in his
complaint.
He demanded a probe by the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) into his sister's
murder.
sexual harassment: Intern moves SC for inquiry against Justice Swatanter Kumar

New Delhi: A former law intern, who has made sexual harassment allegations against Justice Swatanter
Kumar, today moved the Supreme Court seeking inquiry against the retired judge.
A bench headed by Chief Justice P Sathasivam, before whom the matter was mentioned for urgent
hearing, agreed to take up the case on January 15.
The intern, in the petition, challenged the apex court's December 5, 2013 full court resolution in which it
was decided that no complaint against its retired judges will be entertained.

The petitioner also submitted that a proper forum be constituted to conduct inquiry in such cases and her
complaint be also looked into by the apex court like it was done in the case of sexual harassment
allegations against Justice (retd) A K Ganguly.
The intern has made Justice Kumar, Secretary General of the Supreme Court and Union of India parties in
the case.
She submitted that Justice Kumar was a sitting judge at the time of the alleged incident and the apex court
must look into the complaint as per Vishaka guidelines.
Justice Kumar, who is currently heading the National Green Tribunal, has described the allegations as
"incredulous and false" and "some kind of conspiracy".

IB confirms Mysore Roost Resort sex scandal


The Intelligence Bureau has provided the Centre with a detailed account of the escapade
involving three Karnataka High Court judges on November 3 in a resort on the outskirts of
Mysore, highly placed sources told The Times of India on Friday.
According to a senior official, Most of the information sought has not only confirmed the veracity
of the incident but the government has crosschecked it with another police agency. Both the
reports match.
The incident was widely reported in the media. What has surprised the Centre is the dogged
refusal of the Karnataka police to confirm the incident. Mysore Police Commissioner C.
Chandrasekhar first denied that the incident ever took place. Only when a public notice was
issued through the high court registrar seeking information on the Mysore scandal, did the facts
come out in the open. Public protest helped a lot, says the source.
What transpired at the resort, says the source, cannot be expected from anyone in civil society,
leave alone persons sworn to upholding the law. According to him, The IB report consists of
unmentionable facts and also makes it amply clear that the Mysore incident is not the first time
such things have happened. Can anyone expect upholders of the law to pick a fight with people
who complained to the police when caught in a compromising position?
In a related development, Karnataka High Court Chief Justice N.K. Jain has written to Chief
Justice of India Justice G.B. Pattanaik asking that three judges be transferred. Jain has proposed
that Justice N.S. Veerabhadraiah be transferred to the Patna High Court, Justice

Chandrasekharaiah to Jammu & Kashmir and Justice V. Gopala Gowda to the Gauhati High
Court.
While Jain is understood not to have given any reasons, highly placed sources say the proposal
for transfers is linked to the Mysore incident.
However, the source says that now the government is worried about the appropriate remedial
measures. In such cases, transferring a judge to a remote high court doesnt always work. He
says, Bar associations and the people of northeastern states were up in arms when some
judges of the Punjab and Haryana high courts were transferred there. We expect similar protests
if the CJI accepts Justice Jains proposal to transfer the three judges of the Karnataka High
Court.
The Bar Council of India on Friday, while expressing its anguish at the Karnataka incident, called
for follow-up action.
Unless prompt and appropriate action is taken, it will erode the faith of public in the only
institution considered to be the bastion of our fighting faith in democracy, it said in a statement.
The BCI has lamented inaction in this case by the higher judiciary and the government.
Read more: IB confirms Mysore sex scandal The Times of India
http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/city/bangalore/IB-confirms-Mysoresexscandal/articleshow/29801662.cms#ixzz1B7PtvFdU ,
Read full details in the attachment
https://docs.google.com/viewer?
a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzb3Nldm9pY2Vmb3JqdXN0aWNlfGd4Ojc3MjUzOGU4ND
U0ZDFlODg ,
https://docs.google.com/viewer?
a=v&pid=sites&srcid=ZGVmYXVsdGRvbWFpbnxzb3Nldm9pY2Vmb3JqdXN0aWNlfGd4Ojc3MjUzOGU4ND
U0ZDFlODg ,

Panel names former India Supreme Court judge Ganguly in sex harassment allegation
Shocked, shattered by allegations: former Supreme Court judge Ganguly
New Delhi: A three-member panel that probed the charge of sexual harassment of a young lawyer by a
Supreme Court judge has submitted its report, identifying the judge as A K Ganguly, court sources said on
Friday.
The report was submitted on Thursday after the committee of three judges met six times. This is the first
time an alleged perpetrator has been named.

The report, submitted to Chief Justice P Sathasivam, also carries the statements of the victim, who interned
in the Supreme Court, and that of the now-retired Justice Ganguly, the sources said.
The graduate of Kolkata-based National University of Judicial Sciences (NUJS) had alleged sexual
harassment by Ganguly while interning for him in December 2012.
The committee, which held six sittings on November 13, 19, 21, 26, and 27, submitted its report to Chief
Justice Sathasivam on November 28.
The victim appeared before the committee on November 19 and was expected to appear again on
November 21 but chose to stay away.
She first mentioned the incident in a blog for Journal of Indian Law and Society on November 6 and later
told the same in an interview with Legally India website.
The victim, who is working with Natural Justice: Lawyers for Communities and Environment, said she heard
that there were three other girls besides her who were sexually harassed by the same judge.
She also claimed to have knowledge of four more girls who were allegedly harassed by other judges in
their chambers.
Denying any sexual harassment, Ganguly on Friday said he was shocked and shattered by the charges
against him.
I am denying everything. I have told the committee that all the allegations levelled by the intern are wrong.
I dont know how such allegations have been levelled against me, he said.
I am a victim of situations, he told television channels.
I am not ashamed of anything, he said in reply to a question regarding the alleged episode which came
out in public after the victim spoke about it in the legal portal earlier this month.
He said the charges against him were totally wrong. The girl had not raised any sexual harassment issue
with him, he said, adding that he had not done any physical harm to her.
The former judge said the intern worked with him though she was not officially allocated to him. She came
in the place of another intern who had gone abroad after marriage. I never put up a poster. She came on
her own.
He said the girl had come to his house on a number of occasions in connection with work.

When a Judge Himself Commits Crime , When a POLICE Himself robs , Murders .
In the rape case of Ms.Nirbhaya committed last year in New Delhi , all the accussed were from
lower middle class background. So , the whole society , media , police raised voiced against them and the
guilty were rightly prosecuted.
But take the recent case of Supreme Court Judges accussed of sexual offences Mr. A . S. GANGULY , Mr.
SWATHANTER KUMAR or DGP SPS Rathore involved in Ruchika case or some some Ministers ,
MLAs , MPs, the media , society , police & Prosecuting judges are biased towards the accussed.
Because the accussed are rich & mighty , belong to ruling elite class.

Are not the laws & its enforcements fair , equitable , just and same for one & all ?
The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others to
emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by the teacher. if
the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same mistake. if a thief steals , he
can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police himself commits crime , many thieves go
scot-free under his patronage. even if a police , public servant commits a crime , he can be legally
prosecuted & justice can be sought by the aggrieved.
just think , if a judge himself that too apex court of the land itself commits crime - violations of RTI
Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and obstructs the public from performing their
constitutional fundamental duties , what happens ?
it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in public service to commit
more crimes. that is exactly what is happening in india. the educated public must raise to the
occasion & peacefully , democratically must oppose this criminalization of judiciary , public
service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
I have shown in the following attachment how justice is bought , purchased , manipulated in INDIA
with actual cases. Just see the recent examples of supreme court judges involved in sexual
assault case & ROOST Resort Mysore Sex scandal involving judges , if any ordinary fellow had
committed the same crimes he would have been hauled over the coal fire. Just take another recent
example of Prisoner Movie actor sanjay dutt , TADA provisions were diluted by the judge to favour him
and now he is getting parole week after week while the ordinary convicts never get a single parole
throught their sentence. What Brilliant Judges , what brilliant police sirji.
Parties question parole for Sanjay
A doctor who examined the actors wife said she has been diagnosed with a tumor in the liver and a
suspected heart ailment.
Opposition parties in Maharashtra have accused the State government of preferential treatment in granting
a one-month parole to Bollywood actor and 1993 Mumbai blasts convict Sanjay Dutt. The actor was
granted parole on Friday on the grounds that his wife Maanyata was unwell and needed to undergo
surgery.
This is the second time in three months that the actor who is the brother of Congress MP Priya Dutt
has been granted leave from the Yerawada jail. Mr. Dutt has been serving the remaining period of his twoyear sentence there since May 2013. In October, he got a months leave on grounds of ill health. However,
the same month, the parole application of another 1993 Mumbai blasts convict Zaibunissa Kazi was turned
down. She had asked for leave to visit her ailing mother. On Saturday morning, a group of activists from the
Republican Party of India staged a protest outside the jail. This is a blatant misuse of power by the
Maharashtra government. It is clear that Sanjay Dutt is getting preferential treatment, said Manoj Gaikwad,
an RPI activist and Sangharsh Samiti volunteer.

In Mumbai, BJP leader Gopinath Munde demanded the order be reversed. How can Sanjay Dutt be given
parole after such a short gap? The parole should be cancelled and there should be action against the
officer who cleared it, he said.
Mr. Munde said the authorities needed to check if Mr. Dutts wife was genuinely unwell. However, Maanyata
Dutts doctor Ajay Chaughule from the Global Hospital told The Hindu that a tumour had been detected in
her liver.
Corruption in Indian Judiciary :
http://www.corruptioninindia.org/IndianJudiciary.php
Two former Judges accuse former CJI Balakrishnan of fixing and corruption
http://barandbench.com/content/two-former-judges-accuse-former-cji-balakrishnan-fixing-andcorruption#.Uq2wq9Rmxe4 ,

Corruption Is Rampant In The Lower Courts


Former chief justice of India on corruption in judiciary
Yet another case of judicial corruption was exposed last month when the Andhra Pradesh High Court
suspended additional special judge for CBI cases T. Pattabhi Rama Rao following allegations of corruption.
Charged on the basis of a complaint filed by the CBI, the special judge had allegedly taken a bribe of Rs 5
crore to grant bail to former Karnataka minister Gali Janardhana Reddy in the illegal mining case. The
vigilance wing of the high court found the allegation to hold merit. Former chief justice of India V.N.
Khare told Chandrani Banerjeethat such incidents are now rampant. Excerpts:
Are bribes for bail endemic now?
There is no doubt about it. It is rampant. Corruption in the lower courts is no secret. Sometimes, in the high
court as well, cases of corruption have surfaced, but in my experience while I was in the Supreme Court, I
have not witnessed anything similar.
In the lower courts, its alleged that everything comes for a price. Rates are fixed for quick divorce,
bail and other favourable verdicts.
Cases in the media glare, constantly scrutinised, are different. Otherwise it is very difficult for the common
man. There are huge time gaps between hearings. Years are spent to get an order from the lower courts.
So, it is difficult.
Judges are
only human, like
us. They come

from the same


society. Our
society is all
about quick
successes.
Short cuts are
taken. Even by
the judges.
Subordinate courts function under the supervision of high courts. Should the higher courts be
accountable?
The respective high courts have so much of work that monitoring district courts is just part of the routine.
High courts have inspecting judges who are responsible for monitoring district courts. They go with a lot of
band baaja and have lunch while on inspection. Inspecting judges are presented with a rosy picture and
then they file a report. Now, the greater problem is that they are overburdened with work. Cases are in
addition to administrative work, besides other mandatory official work. As a result, the inspecting judges of
the high courts have no time to follow up. We need dedicated staff to monitor the district courts.
What kind of monitoring is needed?
A team of three serving judges should be formed. These judges should dedicatedly monitor the district
judges. Their judgements should be analysed and questioned. Their attendance and work should be
scrutinised. Someone should question them about their performance. I feel doing that will put in some
checks.
You mean to say work overload and pendency of cases have themselves become a factor in
corruption?
Yes, to a large extent. The high court judges are overburdened and they have no time. They always inform
the district court authorities before the visits. It causes a situation where the real problem never comes to
the surface. A dedicated committee of judges will help, but we are short of people. To my knowledge, we
have 13.2 judges for 10 lakh people. If required to, we use excess strength in a particular situation, but
there is no permanent arrangement. We work on an ad-hoc basis and so there are problems.
Would a few suspensions control corruption in the lower courts?
They will certainly convey a message. When I was serving, I did take certain measures which sent the
message across the country that any charge of corruption will be probed. Fast actions and decisions on
charges levelled against judges always work as deterrent.
What is the role of the inspecting judges in controlling corruption?
They should conduct sudden checks, always unannounced, and also follow up on any complaint registered
in the district courts. However, to actualise this, we have to have a sufficient number of good judges. The
monitoring will then be effective and result-oriented.
What is the mechanism to keep the lower courts free from corruption?
A dedicated committee of judges that will only monitor lower courts. Punctuality, integrity and court orders
everything should be under the lens. Such accountability will ensure the right kind of order is delivered in
every petition.

Is consumerism responsible for fostering corruption in lower courts?


Judges are only people, like us. They come from the same society. Society is all about taking short cuts.
Society is about quick successes. So, short cuts are taken and the judges are no different.
Supreme Court wants corrupt judges thrown out

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/corruption-in-judiciary--sc-wants-corrupt-judges-thrownout/1/137730.html


In a strong message against corruption in the subordinate judiciary, the Supreme Court on Tuesday
observed incorrigible judges who were bringing the entire judiciary to disrepute should be thrown out.
"A large section of subordinate judges is bringing disrepute to the entire judiciary. We have to hear of
judges taking money and can do nothing but hang our heads in shame," a bench comprising Justices
Markandey Katju and Gyan Sudha Misra said.
"Incorrigible judges should be thrown out," the bench said, while dealing with a contempt petition against an
additional district judge (ADJ).
ADJ Archana Sinha, who repeatedly pleaded for mercy, had stayed the operation of a Supreme Court order
on the eviction of a tenant from a prime property in Connaught Place.
"The ( ADJ's) order is quashed as mala fide and void," the bench said, while directing the Delhi High Court
to seek an explanation from her.
The bench directed the chief justice of the HC to conduct an inquiry into the matter and take such action as
he deemed fit.
With Sinha's counsel Jayant Bhushan claiming her action was not mala fide, Justice Katju, who initially
planned to suspend her with immediate effect, asked: "She sat over the head of the Supreme Court. You
want us not to suspend her?" "She had no business to hear the matter. Instead she superseded and
overruled us," he said.
Bhushan, thereafter, tried to take the court through some documents to show her action was not totally
unjustified, but the court was not inclined to consider such pleas.
"Once she came to know of the Supreme Court order, all this was irrelevant and she should not have
touched the matter," Justice Katju said.
"We have to hear of judges taking money. A message has to go. We will not tolerate this," the bench said.
At one point, the bench mellowed down when Sinha pleaded for mercy with folded hands. "Hamare pas bhi
dil hai (we also hearts too)," Justice Katju said.
With the bench deciding to let her off with a written apology, the counsel for the landlord, Dushyant Dave,
opposed any leniency for the judge. "Let her give an explanation to the high court chief justice. I believe
there is a history behind this. The judiciary gets a bad image because of judges like these," Dave said.
Opposing leniency, he said: "If it was contempt by someone from the executive, he would have been sent
to jail for this." The bench, thereafter, took a tough stand and referred the matter to the HC chief justice
after holding in clear terms that her action was tainted with mala fide intentions.

Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/corruption-in-judiciary--sc-wants-corrupt-judges-thrownout/1/137730.html

India: Contemptible justice


The spate of scams involving some members of the Indian higher judiciary in corruption, bribery, sex,
nepotism and abuse of power has again drawn attention to the long overdue need for reform of the judicial
system. The image of the judiciary and its credibility are perhaps at an all-time low. The problem of
corruption comes on top of the problem of judicial inertia and the prohibitively expensive nature of the
process of securing justice. This has effectively ensured that the judicial system cannot deliver justice to the
ordinary citizen. All this suits the ruling establishment just fine, since those who have the power of force or
money do not need the courts to get justice. It is the poor and the oppressed, the common people who
need a properly working system for the administration of justice. This is also why those who have the power
to reform the system have failed to do so despite knowing the problems and the solutions. It has become
clear that judicial reforms will only come when the general public, who are the consumers of justice, put
together a strong and powerful movement on this issue.
There are enough indications that corruption in the higher judiciary has reached unacceptable levels. For
instance, in March this year, Justice Shamit Mukherjee of the Delhi High Court had to tender his
resignation, following which he was arrested by the Central Bureau of Investigation under sections of the
Anti-corruption Act, 1988 and sections of the Criminal Procedure Code for criminal conspiracy. Rampant
corruption, which has steadily undermined the credibility of and popular faith in the judicial mechanism, was
clearly to be expected in a situation where the higher judiciary enjoys enormous powers without
accountability.
Power sans accountability inevitably breeds corruption and abuse. Consider the situation. Once appointed,
a judge of a high court (the highest judicial mechanism in the states) or the Supreme Court, cannot be
touched except by a complicated procedure of impeachment. As per the constitutional provisions, a judge
of a high court or the Supreme Court can only be removed by impeachment after 100 members of the Lok
Sabha (the lower house) or 50 members of the Rajya Sabha (the upper house) move the speaker, who
may refer the charges to a committee of judges whose verdict is put up before both the houses of
Parliament. The judge can only be removed if a two third-majority of members present and voting approve
the verdict of the committee.
Today impeachment remains the only option since the judicial system has insulated itself from criminal
investigation through a Supreme Court ruling. This happened in 1991 in a case arising from the discovery
of huge quantities of money in the residence of Justice K Veeraswamy, then Chief Justice of the Madras
High Court. When the Central Bureau of Investigation prosecuted for corruption, the Supreme Court ruled
that no First Information Report can be registered against a judge, nor a criminal investigation be initated,
without prior consent of the Chief Justice of the Supreme Court. This effectively excluded the higher

judiciary from the ordinary laws of the land, since there is no possible circumstance under which an
investigating agency can approach the Chief Justice for consent to investigate a judge without any concrete
evidence against him. This is the reason why no judge has ever been subjected to a criminal investigation
after the Veeraswami judgment. In the meanwhile, armed with this legal immunity judicial corruption has
continued to flourish.
This immunity is doubly reinforced by the fact that the procedure for impeachment of judges is not only
cumbersome, it is also eminently susceptible to political interference. The existing system of impeachment
was found to be practically unworkable in the V Ramaswamy case, where the judge survived in office
despite being found guilty on several serious charges of corruption by a statutory committee of three fellow
judges. This was because members of the Congress, then in power during the prime ministership of PV
Narasimha Rao, abstained from voting due to a whip issued by the party leadership when the impeachment
motion was put to vote in Parliament in May 1993. In that particular case, however, it was at least possible
to initiate the process, because the charges against the judge dealt with irregularities in purchases made in
his official capacity. These purchases were audited by the Accountant General and it was in that process
that the evidence of corruption came out. As a result, it was possible to frame charges for his impeachment
and have the relevant procedural motions signed by 100 members of Parliament. In normal cases of
judicial corruption however, it is difficult to produce evidence of the judges corruption in the absence of
official investigation. Thus, it is not possible to even initiate the process of impeachment, let alone carry one
through to the bitter end.
Judges sellout
Apart from enjoying immunity from removal and investigation, the higher judiciary further enjoys virtually
unlimited powers of punishing people for contempt of court. Any person making any allegation of corruption
against a sitting judge can be charged and punished for contempt, even if he is in a position to substantiate
the charge. The contempt proceedings are so biased in favour of the judicial system that the very judge
against whom the allegation of corruption has been made can prosecute the charge for contempt. The
judge can even sit in judgment on his or her own cause, and can actually refuse to permit the alleged
contemnor to lead evidence to prove the charge. This is such a vast and unchecked power that it can easily
be and has been misused by the judiciary.
The excessive power that the judiciary wields in respect of contempt is in reality a way of shielding itself
from legitimate criticism even when such criticism does not otherwise prejudice or obstruct the
administration of justice. The existence of this arbitrary power is undoubtedly one of the main reasons why
public exposure of judicial corruption has been few and far between and even routine criticism of the
judiciary is muted.
Beyond the matter of public scrutiny, the Indian judiciary has been steadily increasing its other powers over
the years, adding vast and arbitrary authority ostensibly for enforcing the fundamental rights of citizens.
However, these powers are usually exercised in the interests of the ruling establishment. More and more
instances are being witnessed where, by judicial fiat, the constitutional mandate is flouted and even the
fundamental rights of liberty, equality and right to work are rendered nugatory when ordinary citizens are
pitted against the state and powerful sections of society. This is how, for instance, in the interest of cleaning
up Delhis air by reducing the levels of pollution, the Supreme Court ordered the closure and relocation of
several small industries in the city, leading to the loss of livelihood for several thousand workers.

As it is, the state has a long record of enacting anti-democratic and draconian laws. Not only have the
courts usually put their seal of approval on these laws, but they have sanctified action taken under them,
such as the dismissal of employees en-masse from industrial jobs. The judiciary has also recently been
playing a leading role in upholding the sellout of public enterprises by disinvestments carried out under the
cover of globalisation. Lately, it has played a retrograde role in curbing the rights of workers to protest and
go on strike, endorsing several antidemocratic measures to restrict their rights. Meanwhile, the proliferation
of public interest litigations has encouraged unrestrained judicial activism. Though judicial activism through
public interest litigations can be a healthy check on an executive which has failed and become corrupt, it
can become a menace in the hands of a corrupt and unaccountable judiciary.
The problems with the higher judiciary, however, begin with the process of appointment itself. Quite apart
from the fact that the method of selection of judges itself is defective, the entire process is kept under a
cloak of secrecy. Thus, before an appointment is actually made, the general public does not have any idea
about who are being considered for the post. Many persons whose integrity was known to be suspect and
those who had been found guilty of professional misconduct during their legal career have come to be
appointed to high office through this secretive system. The selection process has undergone some change
over the years, but it has not reduced the spate of undesirable and positively harmful appointments. While
earlier the selection was made by the government itself (after consultations with the Chief Justice), now, by
a process of judicial interpretation, the power has been transferred to a collegium of three to five judges of
the Supreme Court. This has managed to reduce the governments monopoly over appointments, but the
system has not change significantly. The patronage system has simply become more fraternal, since senior
judges of the Supreme Court now wield the power of appointment of their junior colleagues. The proof is in
the results, and there has not been a noticeable difference in the quality of appointments.
National commission
In an attempt to tackle the problem relating to appointments and accountability of judges, the Committee on
Judicial Accountability (COJA), consisting of members of the legal profession, almost a decade ago
forwarded a detailed proposal for a high-powered, full-time and independent National Judicial Commission
(NJC). This commission would make appointments as also have disciplinary powers over judges of the
higher judiciary. The commission would also be responsible for appointments to various commissions and
quasi-judicial bodies. The NJC would comprise a nominee each of the Supreme Court, the chief justices of
the high courts, the central cabinet, the opposition in Parliament, and the bar. It would also have an
investigative machinery of its own to inquire into complaints against members of the judiciary. Members of
the NJC would have the same status as that of Supreme Court judges and a guaranteed tenure of five
years, after which they would be ineligible for any other similar post.
This proposal would have brought transparency into the system of appointment of judges. But even though
nearly every political party included the proposal in its election manifesto, the National Judicial Commission
is yet to become reality. The reasons are not far to seek. But now, after the spate of highly publicised
judicial scandals, particularly the Shamit Mukherjee case, the government has come up with a proposal to
constitute a somewhat truncated NJC. This commission is to be a part-time body of three senior sitting
judges of the Supreme Court, the law minister and a nominee of the prime minister. This NJC will not have
the power of removal of judges and the present impracticable system of impeachment will continue. The
governments proposal will merely institutionalise the system of sharing the spoils of appointment between
the government and the senior members of the judiciary.

Since under the circumstances the judiciary cannot be expected to reform itself, and since the main political
parties have reneged on their electoral commitment as expressed in their manifestos, only a strong public
campaign can provide the impetus to put in place an independent and responsible body for the
appointment and removal of judges. Popular pressure is the only force that can get the 1991 Veerasamy
judgment overruled, whether legislatively or judicially, to ensure that judges can be investigated like any
other class of citizens. Civic mobilisation is necessary to force change in the contempt law so as to ensure
that citizens cannot be prosecuted for making allegations against judges, unless they have done so
recklessly or in bad faith. The law must be changed so that judges cannot sit in judgement of their own
contempt cases. If the judicial mechanism has to be rescued from its own infirmities, citizens and civil
society in India must put together a strong movement to force accountability in the judiciary.

Editorial : Hang Rapist Judges to Lamp Posts - JUDGES & SEXUAL CRIMES

At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to the honest few public servants
in public service including judiciary & Police. However, the corrupt in public service dont deserve
respect as individuals as they are parasites in our legal system. Still we respect the
chairs they occupy but not the corrupt individuals.
All the following articles / issues , past cases of sexual assaults on women by judges (hushed up ?)
, whole articles published in the weblinks mentioned
below forms part of this appeal. The term JUDGE mentioned throught includes all public
servants discharging judicial functions right from taluk magistrates , quasi-judicial
officers to Chief Justice of India.
Indian Legal / Judicial System is manipulated at various stages & is for sale. It is a SHAME.
The persons who raise their voice seeking justice are silenced in many ways. The
criminal nexus has already attempted to silence me in many ways . If anything untoward
happens to me or to my family members , my dependents , Honourable Chief Justice of
India together with jurisdictional police officer will be responsible for it.
Hereby, we do once again offer our conditional services to the honourable supreme court
of India & other government authorities, in apprehending criminals including corrupt
judges & police. Herewith , we once again appeal to the honourable supreme court of
India , to consider this as a PIL Appeal in public interest.
Consider the cases of sexual assault by JUDGES , POLICE on women . The JUDGES
have legal immunity with respect to their official duties, official actions but not their
individual actions amounting to CRIMES.

The public servants & the government must be role models in law abiding acts , for others
to emulate & follow. if a student makes a mistake it is excusable & can be corrected by
the teacher. if the teacher himself makes a mistake , all his students will do the same
mistake. if a thief steals , he can be caught , legally punished & reformed . if a police
himself commits crime , many thieves go scot- free under his patronage. even if a police ,
public servant commits a crime , he can be legally prosecuted & justice can be sought by
the aggrieved. just think , if a judge himself that too of apex court of the land itself
commits crime - violations of RTI Act , constitutional rights & human rights of public and
obstructs the public from performing their constitutional fundamental duties , what
happens ? it gives a booster dose to the rich & mighty , those in power , criminals in
public service to committ more crimes. that is exactly what is happenning in india. the
educated public must raise to the occassion & peacefully , democratically must oppose
this criminalisation of judiciary , public service. then alone , we can build a RAM RAJYA OF
MAHATMA GANDHI'S DREAM.
Hereby , we request the honourable court to reopen all hushed up old cases of sexual assault
involving judges and to punish the guilty judges.
Read Is CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA above LAW ???
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/chief-justice-above-law ,

Shinde protected businessman close to Dawood, alleges former home secretary RK Singh
-

Legal Manipulation / Match Fixing by Union Home Minister

Former Union home secretary R.K. Singh on Monday alleged that Union Home Minister Sushilkumar
Shinde had shielded a top businessman close to Dawood Ibrahim.
He claimed Delhi Police was stopped by Shinde from questioning a Mumbai-based businessman, who is
said to have "some kind of links" with Dawood Ibrahim, in connection with the betting in Indian Premier
League, a T-20 cricketing tournament.
Singh, now a BJP member, also said that there was no assurance given by the US on Dawood Ibrahim. He
said that a meeting of the US and Home Ministry officials took place but there was no assurance by the US.
Earlier, Shinde had said that joint efforts with the US were being made to nab India's most wanted terrorist
Dawood Ibrahim.

"As per our information, Dawood is in Pakistan. When I went to America last year to discuss inland security,
I met the Attorney General who looks after the FBI. I talked to him and we decided that we will pass
whatever information we have on Dawood amongst each other. We decided we will make joint efforts,"
Shinde said when asked about the whereabouts of Dawood who is wanted in a number of cases by Indian
agencies including the 1993 Mumbai blasts.
Singh also alleged that Shinde had regularly interfered in Delhi Police's functioning.
In his interview to TV channels, Singh used the shoulder of former Delhi Police Commissioner Neeraj
Kumar to fire at Shinde claiming that "slips used to reach Delhi Police chief quite often asking about posting
some people as Station House Officers".
"These were not a few postings but in large number of police stations," he told the channels.
"I don't know whether money used to exchange hands but Delhi Police Commissioner told me that
numerous slips used to come from his residence... you don't make large number of recommendations... the
postings as SHO's has a vigilance angle to it," he said.
Singh had earlier claimed there were quarrels between him and Shinde.
When Shinde was asked to respond to reported remarks by Singh in an interview, he said, "One needs to
run administration very well and if anybody fails to do his duty, I am bound to take action against him in the
capacity as Home Minister."
Singh, during his media interview, had claimed that he had many quarrels with Shinde over various issues
and also alleged that Congress-led UPA government was "clueless" about governance and that its
ministers were steeped in corruption.
In what was seen as a snub to Singh, Anil Goswami was also named as his successor weeks before the
end of the incumbent's superannuation.
Singh was also criticised for not making any attempt to inform the family of Afzal Guru, the death row
convict in Parliament attack case, who was hanged on February nine last year.
Read more at: http://indiatoday.intoday.in/story/shinde-protected-businessman-close-to-dawood-allegesformer-home-secretary-rk-singh/1/336015.html

Rajiv Assasination Unanswered questions

Rajiv Gandhi assasination leaves many unanswered questions Unsolved puzzles.


For whom did Rajiv Gandhi got assisinated ? Sudhangan raised various questions
which didnt get answers till 2009. Here are those questions that are unanswered:
1) On 21 -May-1991 Rajiv gandhi started from Delhi for election campaign and
reached Chennai through the route Orissa and Andra Pradesh. How did he
accepted that midnight meeting at Sriperambuthur which was not in the agenda of
TamilNadu Congress committe. ?
2) Is there any plan made somewhere to bring Rajiv Gandhi to Sriperambathur
some how ?
3) The Security official Mr O.P.Sagar was there with Rajiv Gandhi when he
campaigned at Bhubaneshwar and Vishakapattinam. But he didnt come to chennai
along with Rajiv. Why ?
4) Bulgarian television journalists came along with Rajiv during his visits to record
his campaigns. They were with Rajiv in Orissa and Andha Predesh but didnt come
for the next meeting. They stayed in a luxary hotel at Vishakapatinam along with
their special flight pilot. In that case why did they came ?
5) When Rajiv was about to start, there was a problem in the flight. So he went
back to circuit house from the airport. After the problem in flight got fixed, the
chief minister of Andha Pradesh Mr.VijayaBhaskar Reddy informed Rajiv to get
back to airport and Rajiv went to airport. During this time the two Bulgerian
journalists took the security official Sagar along in their car and arrived at airport
late. So the security official could not go along with Rajiv gandhi. Why did such an
experienced security official was made not to travel with Rajiv ?
6) The security official of Rajiv at chennai P.C.Gupta was waiting at chennai
airport for Rajiv. P.C.Gupts is suppose to get the gun from Sagar who was expected
along with Rajiv. Since Sagar has not come along with Rajiv, P.C.Gupta was made to
go with Rajiv without gun. Is there any intenton behind this ?
7) When Rajiv started from Meenambakkam, two ladies claiming as journalists got
inside his car at Ramavaram. Did their identities verified ? Why did the special
investigation branch didnt enquire on them ?
8) Who are the Bulgarian journalists ? Where did they went ?
9) Who are those two lady journalists ? Where did they went ?
10) Those two lady journalists interviewed Rajiv Gandhi. But TamilNadu political
party people, Tha. Pandiyan and Maragatham Chandrasekar were telling they didnt
know what Rajiv spoke with the journalists. What are the hiding ?
11) Just one hour before his murder, Rajiv told it was CIA that killed the pakistan
president Zia-ul-Haq. Why shoud he tell that ? What made him to tell that ? Did he
know if there is some plan like that against him ?
12) July-1991 The central home minister S.P.Chawan made a statement that
apart from LTTE there are other international organizations and powerful external
forces involved in the background of Rajivs murder. Who are they referred here ?
13) Why didnt the special investination branch enquire on the above home
ministers statement ?

14) During the gulf war India helped fueling US aircrafts. Rajiv gandhi seriously
condemmed this help which was done by primie minister Mr Chandrasekar during
that time. Why didnt the special investigation branch enquire on CIAs hands on
this murder, as US was not happy with Rajiv for the above reason ?
15) Palestinian National Authority president, Mr. Yasser Arafat informed to the
indian prime minister during the time Mr .Chandrasekar that Rajiv Gandhis life is
under threat. From where did Arafat got this information ? Who is threatening
Rajiv ? Why did special investigation branch didnt enquire on this ?
16) Arafat could have got this information if the assasination was planned at
western Europe or middle eastern countries. Why is this not probed ?
17) Maragatham Chandrasekar came to attend that meeting with Rajiv Gandhi. Her
daughter, Latha Priyakumar came with her husband and advocate Mahendran from
Arakonam. But it was unknown from where did her son Lalith Chandrasekar and
his wife Vinothini came from. Though it is known that Vinothini is daughter of
Jayavarthane from Sri Lanka, they didnt enquire on her. Infact they didnt enquire
their family who was there at the meeting. why ?
18) Sivarasans mother and Vinothinis father are sinhalas from Sri Lanka who were
present at the incident. It is possible that they were sent by Sri Lankan president
Premadasa as messangers. Premadasa is not happy with Rajiv on sending the
Indian peace keeping force (IPKF) to Sri Lanka. Why was the investigation not done
in that angle ? ( Also we should note here a Sinhala Sri Lankan army person hit
Rajiv Gandhi with a gun during his visit to Sri Lanka )
19) Both LTTE and Sri Lanka hate Rajiv gandhi as he is the reaon for sending Indian
peace keeping force (IPKF) to Sri Lanka. Advocate Mr Chandrasekar challenged
special investigation branch that, if they could prove Vinothini and her family are
innocent then those who did the crime will accept it on their own. But the special
investination didnt accept his challence and not enquired those who is related on
this. why ?
20) Kamini Disanayaka, Athulath Muthali, Wickramasinghe are prominant
politicians in Sri Lanka. When all those people are murdered president Premadasa
was pointed. Why didt the investigation didnt happen in this angle ?
21) Why dont Sivarasan, Dhanu and Subha did this murder due to pressure from
external forces. Just because they are Tamils from yarlpanam, did the
investigators linked them with LTTE and closed the case ?
22) What is the strong evidence that links LTTE and its head Prabhakaran to Rajivs
assasination case. ?
23) What is the proof that Srivarasan spoke to Prabhakaran thro a radio. Why is
this not an assumption ?
24) It is very much possible that politicians within the congress could have
considered Rajiv Gandhi is blocking their development within the party and could
have hired some group to assasinate Rajiv. This motivation cannot be denied.
25) Various international business people specifically those selling weapons would
have been in contact with Rajiv as a prime minister. They could have hired the
assasinators to do this murder. Did investigators probed this ?
26) What if Sri Lanka did this, thinking India might send the Indian peace keeping
force again to their country and didnt like a strong leader emerging from India ?

27) CIA always had interest in erradicating leaders in all third world countries. Did
the same kind of interest got applied on Rajiv ?
28) Rajiv Gandhi is the only leader who prevents the other prominant political
party in India BJP to get into power. It is possible that the indian parties like BJP
and RSS could have used the Hindu favourable LTTE and Sri Lankan tamils to do
this assasination.
29) When other major Congress party members in Tamilnadu like Vazhapaadi and
Moopanar didnt take interest in getting Rajiv to this meeting, Maragatham
Chandrasekar traveled to Delhi and forced Rajiv to come for this meeting at
Sriperambuthur. Is that without her knowledge she become one reason for Rajivs
murder ?
30 ) Who is Pottu Amaan ? Is there a person like that ? LTTE says there was a
senior person by name Amaan who died war and the only person there is Pottu.
How did the special investigation branch stamped someone who is not alive as
second criminal in this case ?
31) There are many parallels between the murder of Padmanabha and that of
Rajiv Gandhi. Padmanabhas murder was investigaed by TamilNadu queue branch
police and Rajiv Gandhis murder was investigated by special investigation branch.
Both the investigators are telling the murder was planned at Yarlpanam, Sri Lanka.
Sivaraasan was identified as the prime criminal in both the Padmanabhas case as
well as Rajiv case. Prabhakaran was considered criminal in Rajivs assasination
case bur was not in Padmanabhas case. How come ? It shows adding Prabhakarans
name came out of political decision rather than that came out from investigations.
It is clearly an effort taken by special investigation branch to to give life to their
case intentionally.
32) A famous Sri Lankan tamil poet Kasi. Anandan met Rajiv at the airport. What
message did he got from Prabhakaran to Rajiv gandhi ? If Prabhakaran seeked
Rajivs help in the freedom struggle of Tamil Eelam through Kasi Anandan, why
would Prabhakaran murder Rajiv Gandhi ?
33) Prabhakaran knows it is from India and TamilNadu that he can get support and
sympathy. Did Prabhakaran done such a foollish activity by killing Rajiv, to loose all
the support of Indians and also get the organization banned ?
34) Latha Kannan stopped Rajiv and read a poetry for him. That enabled Dhanu, a
suside bomber standing next to her, to burst the bomb. Why is her name is not
included in the criminals list ? Dhanu used only Latha kannan to get inside. When
HariBabu who got killed in the blast got included in the criminals list why not
Latha Kannan ? Why is special investigation branch showing softness towards
congress members ?
35) Before getting to SriPambuthur, Rajiv spoke at two roadside gatherings.
Vazhapaadi Ramamurthy, the TamilNadu congress leader was with him in those two
places. But at Sri Perambuthur meeting he was standing very far from Rajiv. Why
so ?
36) Many innocent people and security personnels died along with Rajiv Gandhi.
But nothing happened to any of the congress party members not even minor
injury. How ?
37) It was believed that Latha Kumar who brought Sivarasan, Dhanu and Subha to

SriPerambuthur. She took them specifically to ladies section and told Latha Kannan
to take care of them. But Latha Kumars name is not in the criminals list. Why ?
38) How can we say Prabhakaran is involved just based on an old photograph of
Sivarasan with Prabhakaran ?
39) Why is it not possible that Sivarasan, Dhanu and Subha are expelled from LTTE
and they have been hired by western, European, Middle East or India as
professional assasinators.
40) Ranganathan confessed that it was based on request by Margret Alva that he
gave his house at Bangalore for rent to Sivarasan. Did they enquired how far this is
true ?
41) Is there any investigation done on involvement of Chandra Swami,
Subramanyam Swamy , Chandrasekar and arms business person Kasoki in this
murder ?
42) What kind of benifit LTTE get by murdering Rajiv Gandhi ? Did super powers
like US helped them by arms through CIA ?
43) Why do we need CBI & Special Investigation branch which find few people they
prefer to get the reports ?
Unless all these confusions are clarified, the real culprit will be hiding behind
some powerful forces.
Continue reading at NowPublic.com: Rajiv Assasination Unanswered questions |
NowPublic News Coverage http://www.nowpublic.com/world/rajiv-assasinationunanswered-questions#ixzz2Ayg9VI74

People at the helm are protecting Rajiv murder accused


Former Central Bureau of Investigations former chief investigating officer K
Ragothaman has claimed in a recently published book Conspiracy to kill Rajiv:
From CBI files that a lot of facts pertaining to the former prime ministers
assassination were either suppressed, or were studiously ignored.
Ragothamam writes that there were attempts made to protect the Liberation
Tigers of Tamil Eelam from being called the conspirators behind Rajivs killing. In
this interview with rediff.coms Vicky Nanjappa, Ragothaman speaks about the
conspiracy and the hurdles that were faced in a probe in which many aspects were
hushed up.
How has your book been received?
That is too early to tell. It is just out, but is under debate. Let us wait and watch.
You write that Dravida Munetra Kazhagam chief M Karunanidhis [ Images ]
scheduled public meeting in Sriperumbudur on May 21, 1991, the day Rajiv was
killed, was abruptly cancelled.
Karunanidhi was to address a meeting at 6O clock that evening, two hours before
Rajivs meeting. The police had made all arrangements. Then there was a telegram
from the Anna Arivalyam postal office jurisdiction that the meeting was cancelled.

I probed the sender of that telegram. I was told to ask Karunanidhi about the
same. However, I could not investigate him directly. Later, I was told by my
superiors that the matter was being looked into, and I should remain quiet.
I was also told that it was a director general of police, Rangaswamy, who had
advised that the meeting be cancelled. However, when I looked at the
Rangaswamy affidavit, it read that he had ordered as much police force as possible
in view of this meeting.
I also attended the Jain commission inquiry in which Karunanidhi was examined.
He had said then that it was the then governor, Bhishma Narayan Singh, who had
told him to cancel the meeting. Look at the contradictions.
Who according to you was the one who advised cancellation of the Karunanidhi
meeting?
Probably it was Marumalarchi Dravida Munetra Kazhagam leader Vaiko who
telephoned and sought cancellation of the meeting. The telephone records needed
to be examined, but it was never done.
Why do you think Vaiko tried to stop Karunanidhi?
After Rajivs assassination, many DMK workers were attacked, their offices burnt.
If Karunanidhi had gone there, he would have been in trouble and there would
have been an onslaught. Hence, they were trying to protect him.
Does this mean even Karunanidhi was part of the plot?
No, that is not what I meant. Karunanidhi is not a killer. He wanted a democratic
solution to the problem and this was never liked by slain LTTE [ Images ] chief
Prabhakaran.
You accuse Vaiko of having a hand in this entire issue.
Vaiko was the one who spoke vehemently against the Indo-Jaffna accord. Vaiko
said at that time he was first an LTTE, then a Tamilian and then an Indian. At the
time of the accord, Prabhakaran was brought down to New Delhi [ Images ] and
was put up at the Hotel Ashoka.
Vaiko sought to meet him, but he was not allowed to do so. He conversed with
Prabhakaran on the intercom, during which the latter told him, Anna, this Rajiv
has betrayed me. I feel like committing suicide as he is sealing my fate. But I
cannot kill myself as I need to fight for my people.
Vaiko wrote a book later in which he mentions that Prabakaran had thought of
committing suicide.
Tell us more, sir
When Vaiko had gone to Sri Lanka [ Images ], we had secured a videotape titled
Inside a Tigers Cave which has him on tape. There he spoke everything that was
anti-Rajiv. It appeared that he was more against Rajiv than Prabakaran himself.
This was also a point noted during our investigation.
Then there is also a meeting in which Vaiko says that Rajiv wont go back alive
from Tamil Nadu. He, however, retracted that statement. During the investigation,
we questioned one Chinna who is on death row.
He said that in one of the hideouts, Sivarasan (the prime accused in the
assassination) held talks with one Srinivas Ayya and said that after the successful
completion of the mission, they should ensure that Vaiko becomes the chief
minister of Tamil Nadu.

Why was the evidence not used then?


This is a question that I have been asking. We had so much evidence, but
surprisingly Vaiko was roped in as prosecution witness number 250 in the Terrorist
and Disruptive Activities court.
During the trial, he denied speaking all of which was on video with Prabhakaran.
The video was played out. He claimed that it was him in the video but the voice
was not his. It was sent for examination and the voice too was confirmed, but till
date there is no perjury case against him.
You have alleged that even the Intelligence Bureau and the Research and Analysis
Wing tried to cover up LTTEs role?
After the assassination, Chandrashekhar, the then prime minister, convened a
meeting in which even Janata Party president Subramanian Swamy (then minister
of commerce and industry) was present. The then IB chief, MK Narayanan, and
RAW boss, GS Bajpai, were also present.
Swamy said that it was obvious that the LTTE was responsible. Bajpai retorted that
it was not the LTTE. The meeting was adjourned. Meanwhile, the CBI director had
gone to Colombo for the investigation.
They were called back and rushed to Delhi for the meeting. During the meeting, it
was again asked why a trip was made to Colombo and did that mean it was
preconceived that it was the LTTE which was behind the assassination.
Bajpai once again opposed this. He even quoted one Kittu to be his source. Kittu,
incidentally, was Prabhakarans right hand man. An LTTE man could never have
been a RAW mole and even Dr Swamy had termed this as absurd.
What are your allegations against Narayanan?
A video taken at the meeting on that ill-fated day in which there were images of
Dhanu was never made available to the CBI. The assassination team was waiting
for nearly two hours in a sterile area. The original video reached Narayanan.
The government had decided to conduct an investigation in this regard and this
case was registered with the Special Investigating Team and the CBI. However, it
was buried. My question is, why no action has been taken for suppressing
evidence.
It was being said that Dhanu had barged into the meeting, but this video clearly
shows that they were waiting for a long time. We probed this case risking our own
lives and it does upset me that people sitting at the helm of affairs are protecting
the accused.
Do you think the loopholes will be rectified now?
Let us see.

JUDGES NOT ANSWERING


FOLLOWING QUESTIONS
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005
( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.


ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE
WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR
OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH
ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH ,
INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING
& ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS.
M/s Karnataka Telecables Ltd , Mysore renamed as M/s RPG Telecom Ltd again renamed as
M/s RPG Cables Ltd once again renamed as M/s KEC International , Mysore used
to manufacture PIJF & OFC telecables and supplied it to department of telecommunications ,
government of india , Indian Railways and GAIL , PGCIL of Ministry of Petroleum . DOT used to
pay hundreds of crores of rupees from public exchequer to buy these cables . There is also one
more company by name M/s Concepta Cables Ltd , Mysore belonging to the same industrial
group supplying PIJF & OFC telecables to DOT. As a public , as a citizen of india and as a tax
payer I want to know whether those crores of rupees from public exchequer are well spent.
1. How many times the above said companies were blacklisted by DOT , Supreme Court
of India and other quasi judicial bodies , casewise ?
2.

What action taken by DOT & judicial bodies against the above companies , casewise ?

3. How many cable kms of cable supplied by above companies , were rejected
by DOT from the field yearwise , since 1986 ?
4. Did the above companies replace all the cables rejected by DOT & make good all the
losses , yearwise ?
5.

If not , why ?

6.

What action taken by DOT , casewise ?

7. How many cable kms of cables supplied by above companies were accepted on
deviation by DOT yearwise ? on what basis ?
8.

Has the DOT authorised usage of recycled materials in the manufacture of cables ?

9.

If yes , on what basis ?

10. Did DOT authorize outsourcing of cable manufacturing


process by above companies to third parties , casewise ?
11. How many cable kms of telecom cables supplied by above companies have
failed during usage within the warranty period , yearwise ?

12. Did the above companies honour warranty contract in all such cases ?
13. If not why , casewise ?
14. What action by DOT , casewise ?

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO


YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1986.
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIED :
CPIO , MINISTRY OF TELECOMMUNICATION & INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY ,
GOVERNMENT OF INDIA , LOKSABHA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282813 for rupees ten only
DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)
APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005
( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
We salute honest few in public service , our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO
HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING
QUESTIONS WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE
WITH I AM SEEKING NOT THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR
OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH
ARE VIOLATING PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST
RESPECTS FOR JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH ,
INFORMATION SO THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING
& ABETTING TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE ,
ACTUAL CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS
WITHIN JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,

https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
Main A :
1. The land encroachments & illegal buildings and its continued existence since
years is not possible without tacit , covert support of jurisdictional revenue officials.
What disciplinary action has been taken against concerned officials with respect to each
case of land encroachment & illegal buildings , case wise ?
2.

If not , why ?

3.

Is not land AKRAMA SAKRAMA SCHEME itself illegal ?

4. Is not the move of government of Karnataka to legalise land encroachments & illegal
buildings , in itself illegal ?
5. Till date in some cases of land encroachers are evicted & some buildings violating
building byelaws demolished , you could have spared them to enjoy the benefit of land
akrama sakrama scheme. Why you didnt spare them ?
6.

Is this scheme applicable for only chosen few ?

7.

Does this scheme also benefit rich people above BPL ?

8.

Does this scheme also benefit big land developers , land developing companies ?

9. To my previous RTI appeals to MUDA , BDA only partial information was given ,
conveniently hiding the truth. Is it not violation of RTI act ?
10. Does not hiding information about land crimes , in itself also a crime ?
11. I have shown in detail some land crimes in Karnataka. What action by government of
Karnataka , casewise ?
12. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
13. https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,
14. Does not hiding a land crime , embolden land grabber to commit more land crimes ?
Main B : RTI QUESTIONS Mysore DC , COMMISSIONER OF MUDA ( MYSORE URBAN
DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY ) & COMMISSIONER OF MCC ( MYSORE CITY CORPORATION ) ARE
AFRAID TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the mysore
city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT since 1987
till date ?
3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the
authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to
commercial , what norms are followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do
you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate difference
between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?

7. in mysore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building
bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what
action by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of MUDA's / MCC's / GOVERNMENT's lands , sites , buildings & houses have been
illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such illegal
occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has legalized ,
regularized such illegal occupation just through MUDA's / MCC's resolution instead of of
reallotting the same through public notification to the next senior most in the waiting list , after
giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so why ?
12. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands , sites ,
houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in mysore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed ,
Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally
authorized by MUDA , MCC , GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal housing
societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms & housing
societies who have violated MUDA norms , layout plans , etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities ,
parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building byelaw
violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those
violations. Safety of public & amenities of public are totally neglected by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT . When public people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a
complex due to lack of fire exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business
complex as the complex doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way
are forced to come down on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment of Lands
, sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists , etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from
these out of turn allotments by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT ? specific figures yearwise since
1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated MUDA /
MCC / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On MUDA /

MCC / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , MUDA / AUTHORITIES with the help of police
razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force. Whereas , when cronies of political
bigwigs illegally occupy MUDA , MCC / GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big
complexes earning thousands of rupees monthly rent , MUDA or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine.
Why this double standard by MUDA / MCC GOVERNMENT ?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal
occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the MUDA ,AUTHORITIES recovered the rents
earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not why ?
25. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders about it's
auction schedules ?
26. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same purpose
mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the MUDA / AUTHORITIES acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers & selling it at a
premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for
the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their
personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers
are stake holders , owners of such lands. When MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT acquires such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare
objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with
mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by MUDA MCC or other land developers ?
31. has the MUDA , MCC taken alternate steps to create new lakes , ponds ? how many are created
till date ?
32. in & around mysore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as per
Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there are
buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities Have
developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out
advertisement spaces & built permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's
money. This fencing obstructs the movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service
HT line. Are all these structures under
& surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise
?

34. in & around mysore city , in how many areas developed by MUDA & private developers , the
sewage water generated in those areas is directly let into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by MUDA , MCC & other
developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate
developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into
unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public
health hazard ? how the MUDA / MCC is monitoring sewage / waste disposal ? status report
yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around mysore city ? what action by
MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date .
38. around mysore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by
private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are
these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries ,
multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has
KIADB given consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is
it within the KIADB's
comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the MUDA / MCC , KIADB given wide publicity , public notice calling for objections before
alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to MUDA's / MCC's CDP & KIADB's industrial
area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the MUDA & KIADB revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT PLAN ,
to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report
on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building
kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S
THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not
why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any prequalification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?

46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for
alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action ,
why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private
firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at
preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of
the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated
public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by MUDA , MCC or government in
such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action
taken by MUDA , MCC & government action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by MUDA , MCC or authorities ,
on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some MUDA / MCC / REVENUE officials &
their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion authorities
?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by MUDA / MCC /
GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or wholly
to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT before the expiry of
lease period , without public auction ?
55. what are the norms followed by MUDA / MCC / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased lands to
the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
Main C : RTI QUESTIONS COMMISSIONER OF BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT
AUTHORITY ( BDA ) , COMMISSIONER , BRIHATH BANGALORE MAHANAGARA PALIKE ( BBMP )
& CHAIRMAN , KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREA DEVELOPMENT BOARD ( KIADB) ARE AFRAID
TO ANSWER
1. how many times since 1987 , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has revised / modified the
Bangalore city's comprehensive city development plan ?
2. how many cases of CDP violations were registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
since 1987 till date ?

3. how many cases of CDP violations were legalized in the CDP revision / modification by the
authorities ?
4. when an application for alienation of land is made to you , say from civic amenity site to
commercial , what norms are followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
5. how do you provide alternate civic amenity site in the locality , if the area is already full ? do
you deprive people of civic amenities ?
6. during such alenation , is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT collecting market rate
difference between civic amenity site & commercial site ? if not why ?
7. in bangalore city , many building complexes , buildings have been built fully violating building
bye-laws no set off , no parking space , no emergency fire exit , no earthquake tolerant . what
action by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
8. how many cases of building bye-laws violations has been registered by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 ? what is the action status report yearwise ?
9. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , buildings & houses have
been illegally occupied by criminal tresspassers since 1987 ?
10. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT registered criminal cases against each such
illegal occupation ? if not why ? provide status report yearwise ?
11. in how many cases of such illegal occupation BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has
legalized , regularized such illegal occupation just through BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
` s resolution instead of of re-allotting the same through public notification to the next senior most
in the waiting list , after giving notice of allotment cancellation to original allottee ? if not done so
why ?
12. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT followed all legal norms in reallotment of lands
, sites , houses , etc to the illegal occupiers ? what is the procedure followed ?
13. in bangalore city , numerous housing societies & real estate Developers have mushroomed ,
Land allotments of how many housing societies , real estate firms among them are legally
authorized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT & how many not ? since 1987 till date ?
14. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT filed criminal complaints against such illegal
housing societies & illegal real estate firms ? if not why ?
15. what action BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT has initiated against real estate firms &
housing societies who have violated BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms , layout plans ,
etc ? if not why ?
16. the government has framed building bye-laws like width of road , space for civic amenities ,
parking space , emergency fire exit , etc keeping high in the mind safety of people first. BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is in the practice of levying a pittance as penalty on the building
byelaw violators , layout Development plan violators & legalizing those violations. Safety of public
& amenities of public are totally neglected by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT. When public
people die , suffer injuries / accidents say during a fire tragedy in a complex due to lack of fire
exit , when people park vehicles on pavement in front of a business complex as the complex
doesn't have a parking space of it's own , the pedestrians going that way are forced to come down

on road resulting in accidents , injuries & deaths . is not the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT responsible for those accidents , injuries & deaths ?
17. what is the criteria adopted by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for out of Turn allotment
of Lands , sites , houses to renowned sports persons , judges , journalists , politicians , artists ,
etc ?
18. how many judges , artists , politicians , journalists , sports persons , etc have benefited from
these out of turn allotments by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT? specific figures yearwise
since 1987 ?
19. what action has been taken against developers , housing societies , who have violated BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT norms ?
20. when poor scheduled caste , scheduled tribe people , minority people illegally live On BDA /
BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT sites building temporary huts , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT with the help of police razes down those huts & evicts the poor by brute force.
Whereas , when cronies of political bigwigs illegally occupy BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT lands worth crores of rupees & build big complexes earning thousands of rupees
monthly rent , BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or authorities not even files police
complaint against them instead regularizes the illegal occupation by levying a pittance as fine.
Why this double standard by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT?
21. HOW MANY CASES OF ILLEGAL OCCUPATIONS are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT since 1987 till date ? yearwise figures ?
22. how much of BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT lands , sites , houses are under illegal
occupation ? status report yearwise since 1987 ?
23. how much of those has been recovered ? has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
arecovered the rents earned by illegal occupation ?
24. have you filed police complaints against those criminals tresspassers ? if not why ?
25. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving wide publicity & sufficient time to bidders
about it's auction schedules ?
26. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT giving market value to land loosers ?
27. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT exactly using the acquired lands , for the same
purpose mentioned in the project plan ?
28. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquiring lands at lower rates from farmers &
selling it at a premium , by way making profits just like a real estate agency ?
29. in villages , there are cattle grazing grounds meant for the usage of whole villagers, forest for
the usage of whole village , lands belonging to village temples. Some villagers have donated their
personal lands to village temples , cattle grazing for the benefit of whole villagers. All the villagers
are stake holders , owners of such lands. When BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT acquires
such lands to whom does it pay compensation ? what about welfare objectives of those lands ?
30. till date , how many lakes , ponds , how many feeder canals have been closed , filled with
mud , developed , sold as sites , etc by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT or other land
developers ?

31. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT taken alternate steps to create new lakes ,
ponds ? how many are created till date ?
32. in & around bangalore city , high tension electric lines are there in busy residential areas . as
per Indian electricity act , no permanent structures should be under the HT lines. However there
are buildings under it. In some places , HT lines runs in the middle of the road. The authorities
Have developed those areas beneath HT lines as parks , rented out advertisement spaces & built
permanent fencing of those areas spending lakhs of taxpayer's money. This fencing obstructs the
movement of service personnel of electricity board , to service HT line. Are all these structures
under & surrounding HT lines legal ?
33. till date how many burial grounds are acquired & sold as sites by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT or other developers ? specific figures yearwise since 1987 castewise , religionwise
?
34. in & around bangalore city , in how many areas developed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT & private developers , the sewage water generated in those areas is directly let
into lake , ponds ?
35. how many tributaries , lakes , ponds are killed in this fashion by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT & other developers , housing societies ?
36. how many business complexes , flats , residential layouts developed by private real estate
developers , housing societies are dumping the sewage , / waste generated in their buildings , into
unauthorized dumping grounds , lakes , etc . thus disturbing the environment & creating public
health hazard ? how the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT is monitoring sewage / waste
disposal ? status report yearwise since 1987 till date .
37. how many unauthorized housing layouts are there in & around bangalore city ? what action by
BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT against them ? action taken report yearwise since 1987 till
date .
38. around bangalore city , vast areas of village farm lands , agricultural lands are acquired by
private real estate developers for non agricultural purposes by a single firm or single owner. Are
these actions legal ? some of these real estate agents have sold those lands to private industries ,
multinational companies for crores of rupees. Has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
given alienation of land ie conversion from agricultural to industrial usage. Has KIADB given
consent to it ?
39. can a single individual / firm can purchase such vast tracts of agricultural lands , is it legal ? is
it within the KIADB's comprehensive industrial area development plan ?
40. has the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT given wide publicity , public notice calling for
objections before alienation of such lands ?
41. are all those alienations , strictly in conformance to BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT's
industrial area development plan ? violations how many ?
42. is the BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT revising / modifying CDP & INDUSTRIAL AREA
DEVELOPMENT PLAN , to suit those real estate developers & Private companies ? on what legal

grounds ?
43.what action has been taken based on mysore district magistrate mr.T.M.Vijaya Bhaskar's report
on land grabbings in mysore ?
44.in mysore city , hebbal-hootagalli industrial area , a lake has been destroyed while building
kaynes hotel , hinkal lake is shrinking , lake in front of BEML Quarters has been alloted to M/S
THRILLER CLOTHING CO, are all these actions legal & in conformance to MUDA's CDP ? if not
why ? what action ?
45. while auctioning off the lands of sick industrial unit M/S IDEAL JAWA LTD , was there any prequalification to bidders that after purchase of lands only it must be used for industrial use or only
industries can participate in the bidding process ?
46.why not it has been clearly mentioned in the tender document that , said land is open for
alienation ?
47. about this issue , our publication has even raised it's objections , in it's newspaper . no action ,
why ? as a result , the government , banks , employees were cheated off their dues & the private
firm made huge profits. is this auction & alienation legal ?
48.numerous NGO's , trusts promoted by religious bodies , mutts are allotted prime lands at
preferrential rates , for the reason that they will use it for public / social welfare. however many of
the trusts are using the whole or part of the land for commercial purposes other than the stated
public / social welfare purpose. what action has been taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT in such cases ?
49.how many trusts have violated government norms in this way since 1987 till date? what action
taken by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT action taken report yearwise since 1987 till date ?
50.how many such illegalities / violations by trusts are regularized by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB /
GOVERNMENT, on what legal grounds ? ATR since 1987 till date ?
51.before regularizing such violations have you sought public objections & given media
publicity ? if not why ?
52.how you are monitoring the net wealth growth of some BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT
officials & their family members , who have land acquisition / denotifying , land usage conversion
authorities ?
53.how many trusts , NGOs are allotted prime residential / commercial lands by BDA / BBMNP /
KIADB / GOVERNMENT on lease basis , in turn the said trusts , NGOs have sulet it either partly or
wholly to others ?
54.how many such lease allotments are sold by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT before the

expiry of lease period , without public auction ?


55. what are the norms followed by BDA / BBMNP / KIADB / GOVERNMENT for the sale of leased
lands to the lessee before the expiry of lease period ?
56. what is the status of house allotted to sri.chandrashekariah vide BDA allotment letter
no: 310/267/BDA/ADM/KMRSL(H)/78-79 dt 11/08/1978.
57. why BDA didn't file police complaint to evict encroachers?
58. why BDA didn't inform the descendents of original allottee about the cancellation of their
allotment ?
59.what happened to the money deposited by original allottee?
60.is the action of BDA allotting the said house to an illegal encroacher just by the resolution of
BDA committee legal ?
61. in case the BDA wished to re-allot the said house , first it must have informed the original
allottee about cancellation of allotment allowing them sufficient time to reply with public notice in
news papers , then they should have allotted the said house to the senior most in the waiting list.
But BDA has just allotted the house to an illegal encroacher by the resolution of BDA committee.
Is it legal ?
62. BDA officials gave half truths to my RTI request & stated that the said file concerning this
issue cann't be found ie lost . is it legal ?
63. has the BDA filed police complaint regarding theft of file from the record room ?
HONOURABLE COMMISSIONER OF BDA PLEASE REFER THE FOLLOWING ARTICLE.
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/judges-cover-up-land-scams ,
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/land-grabbers-in-m-u-d-a ,

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO


YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIED :
CPIO , MINISTRY OF REVENUE , GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA , VIDHANA
SOUDHA , BANGALORE
FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282812 for Rupees ten only
DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005


( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )
FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.
ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJA.M.R.,
EDITOR , SOS E-VOICE JUSTICE & SOS E-CLARION OF DALIT ,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,
HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA PIN 570017.
We salute honest few in public service , Judiciary , police , parliament & state legislative
assemblies. our whole hearted respects to them. HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO
GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS / ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS WHICH IN
ITSELF ( ie answers ) ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME. HERE WITH I AM SEEKING NOT
THE OPINIONS ABOUT SOME HYPOTHETICAL ISSUES , BUT YOUR OFFICIAL STAND , LEGAL
STAND ON ISSUES WHICH ARE OF FREQUENT OCCURRENCE WHICH ARE VIOLATING
PEOPLES FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS & HUMAN RIGHTS. WE DO HAVE HIGHEST RESPECTS FOR
JUDICIARY & ALL PUBLIC INSTITUTIONS , THIS IS AN APPEAL FOR TRUTH , INFORMATION SO
THAT TO APPREHEND CORRUPT FEW IN PUBLIC SERVICE, WHO ARE AIDING & ABETTING
TERRORISM , UNDERWORLD & CRIMINALS. I HAVE SHOWN IN DETAIL WITH LIVE , ACTUAL
CASES , EXAMPLES , HOW INDIAN LEGAL SYSTEM IS MANIPULATED BY CRIMINALS WITHIN
JUDICIARY , POLICE , PROSECUTION , ETC. READ DETAILS AT :
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/wheeling-dealing-judges-police ,
Atrocities on Women by JUDGES
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/atrocities-by-judges
A Z of Manipulation of Indian Legal System
http://www.scribd.com/doc/187575206/A-Z-of-Manipulation-of-India-Legal-System ,
http://www.scribd.com/doc/173854541/Chief-Justice-of-India-A-Criminal ,
Justice Sathasivam - Are you DEAF DUMB & BLIND
https://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/justice-sathasivam---are-you-deaf-dumb-blind ,
Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Cover-up
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/rajiv-gandhi-assassination-cover-up ,
SHAME SHAME MPs & MLAs
https://sites.google.com/site/sosevoiceforjustice/shame-shame-mps-mlas ,
Hereby , we do request PIO O/O Honourable Chief Justice of India , PIO , O/O H.E.Honorable
President of India , PIO O/O Honorable Speaker of Lok Sabha , PIO O/O Dy Chairman of Rajya

Sabha , PIOs of Karnataka Raj Bhawan , Karnataka CMO , Union Home Ministry GOI and DG & IG
of Police of Government of Karnataka to answer the following questions in public interest , for
safeguarding national security , National unity & integrity & to legally apprehend anti-nationals ,
criminals within the judiciary & police.
Main A :
1. What action you have taken against judges involved in atrocities against women ,
casewise ? if not , why ?
2. What action you have taken against judges involved in land scams , casewise ? if not ,
why ?
3. I have shown with actual cases how manipulation / fixing takes place ,
from complaint filing to judicial pronouncement stage. Are the judges & police , above law
?
4. I have numerous PILs , RTI appeals before supreme court of india. But they were not
registered , not honoured , why ?
5. To my legal notice / show cause notice / damage payment notice to supreme court of
india & chief justice of india , till date I have not received the reply , why ?
6. Is it not the duty of supreme court of india to protect the life & liberty of all Indian
citizens ?
7. Is it not the failure of supreme court of india, when it failed to protect the life of a
complainant ?
8. By negligence of their duties , are not supreme court judges aiding &
abetting criminals , anti nationals & terrorists ?
9. While crores of Indians are barely surviving on a single piece meal a day , people
dying due to starvation , supreme court judges are getting salary & perks amounting to
lakhs of rupees from the same suffering public / public exchequer. Are not those duty
shirking judges ashamed ?
10. What action you have taken against judges involved in hushing up late prime minister
rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
11. Why the supreme court of india didnt allow me to appear before it in the said case
of late PM Rajiv Gandhi Assassination Case ?
12. Why the supreme court of india didnt protect my life , my job oppurtunities , my
newspaper from the wrath of criminal nexus ?
13. When even cable TV journalists , web journalists are getting PRESS / MEDIA
accreditation , my web news papers , myself are not getting PRESS accreditation since 9
years , why ?
14. Are the supreme court judges hand in gloves with the criminal nexus ?
Main B :
You have not taken appropriate action to my previous RTI requests , Numerous appeals for justice
& police complaints. You have not replied to show-cause notice also. Your inaction has helped the
criminals in manipulating & destroying evidences.
Your inaction / delay in performing your duties not only amounts to denial of information , but
amounts to violation of our fundamental & human rights , cover-up of crimes , aiding & abetting

criminals . The criminal nexus tried to silence me in many ways. Is not these acts of yours a
crime in itself ?
If your acts of crime cover-ups , information / evidence cover-ups , aiding & abetting criminals ,
silencing a crusader is just & legal. The same type of acts of crimes performed by other citizens
will also be legal ?
Main C :
At the outset , we express our whole hearted respects to all constitutional institutions & to the
honest few in public service. Contempt of constitutional institutions , citizens of India is being
made by the corrupt persons in constitutional positions themselves. This is an appeal to the
honest few in public service , constitutional positions , to bring their corrupt colleagues to book.
1.
does the action of MPs , MLAs taking money / receiving favors from vested interests ,
to formulate policy decisions , to raise questions in parliament / legislative bodies or to abstain
from voting legal ?
2.

why transparent , fair investigation is not done in such cases ?

3.
just remember , the vulgar acts of Mr.Bora Babu Singh in state legislature & how
some MLAs vulgarly behaved with Ms.Jayalalita in state legislature , years ago. Are these type
of vulgar actions by MPs & MLAs legal ? does not these constitute contempt of the house by MPs
& MLAs themselves ?
4.
all the peoples representatives from panchayath member to president of India must
read ABCD Of Democracy provide along with.since independence of India till date , MPs & MLAs
are forcing projects on people against the wishes of people , formulating policies against the
wishes of people. Are not such projects , government policies & Laws , undemocratic & illegal ?
5.
is the election commission of India verifying the authenticity of affidavits submitted
by electoral candidates ?
6.
how many candidates have been caught so far for giving false affidavits ? are all the
violators prosecuted?
7.
are the MPs , MLAs submitting their wealth details on affidavits yearly to vigilance
authorities ? defaulters , violators how many ?
8.

what legal action taken against violators , defaulters , for giving false affidavits ?

9.

who is checking the authenticity of those affidavits submitted by MPs , MLAs ?

10.
the agricultural incomes of some MPs , MLAs , their kih & kin raises even during the
time of severe drought , floods , fall in prices of agricultural products , their companies register
increase in turnover / profits even during recession , the trusts / NGOs set up by them receive
huge donations. Are all these income legal ?
Main D :
1.
we do once again offer our conditional services to the government of india , all state
governments & supreme court of india , in apprehending tax evaders , land grabbers , corrupt
police , corrupt judges , corrupt public servants , labor law violators , etc. whom the the
government officials , vigilance authorities have failed to apprehend. Why the authorities , courts ,
supreme court of India , are not ready to utilize our service ? are they afraid of being caught ?

2.
the public servants , courts theselves are delaying giving information / records to us
in many cases. So in the issues / cases raised by us , the clause of time bar doe not apply. Are
these delaying tactics of public servants , courts legal ?
3.
why no proper , timely action was not taken based on numerous police complaints
made by us ?
4.
why DG & IGP , Government of Karnataka , has not made any efforts to seek legal
sanction for prosecution of VVIPs ( mentioned in our complaint ) , from union & state home
ministries ?
5.
the criminal nexus is trying to silence me in many ways , but the supreme court of
India & national human rights commission has failed to undo the injustices , why ? is it because
it is not a high profile case ? is it because it is not hi-fi , does not get image ratings , TRPs ?
6.
the public servants are aiding underworld , naxalites & terrorists , by their delaying
tactics & denial of information , records. What action has been taken against such anti-national
elements in public service ?
7.
how many complaints are made by Nagaraj .M.R. , Human Rights Activist , Mysore
(editor of SOS e-clarion of dalit & SOS e-voice for justice) to Karnataka police , to national human
rights commission to supreme court of India till date ? what action taken with respect to each
complaint ?
8.
the delay in taking action by public servants with respect to following cases has
resulted in more crimes , destruction / manipulation of evidences , records and more injustices
to commonman. Why the authorities did not take timely action against criminals in following
cases ?
SOS Appeal to SUPREME COURT of INDIA
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2010/08/s-o-s-appeal-to-supreme-
DEALS IN COURTS & POLICE STATIONS READ :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/satyameva-jayate ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/01/satyameva-jayate.html ,
ACCUSED Chief Justice of India
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/accused-chief-justice-of
,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/2011/02/accused-chief-justice-of
CROSS EXAM OF HONOURABLE CHIEF JUSTICE OF INDIA , SUPREME COURT OF
INDIA http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF UNION HOME SECRETARY , GOI , NEW DELHI
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF DG&IG OF POLICE , GOK , BANGALORE
http://crosscji.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesofsupremecourt.wordpress.com/ ,

http://crosscji.wordpress.com/ ,
http://crossexamofchiefjustice.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF GOVERNOR , RESERVE BANK OF INDIA
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ , http://theftinrbi.rediffblogs.com/
, http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/
CROSS EXAM OF MUDA COMMISSIONER , MUDA , MYSORE
http://crimesofmuda.blogspot.com/ , http://manivannanmuda.blogspot.com/
, http://crimesatmudamysore.wordpress.com/ ,
CROSS EXAM OF BDA COMMISSIONER , BDA , BANGALORE
http://crimesofbda.blogspot.com/ , http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
CORPORATE CRIMES RPG CABLES LIMITED
http://crimesatrpg.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimesatrpg.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/218
MEGA FRAUD BY GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
are you ready to catch tax thieves ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
MOBILE PHONES , CURRENCY SCANDALS
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
reliance industry where is accountability ?
http://megafraudbygoi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://megafraudbygoi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/196
crimes at infosys campus
http://crimeatinfy.blogspot.com/ ,
http://crimeatinfy.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/214
crimes by B.D.A against a poor woman
http://crimesofbda.blogpot.com/ ,
http://bdacrimes.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
crimes of land mafia in India
http://landscamsinindia.blogspot.com/ ,
http://landscam.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212
currency thefts in RBI Press
http://theftinrbi.blogspot.com/ ,
http://theftinrbi.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/80
killer colas & killer medicines of India
http://deathcola.blogpot.com/ ,
http://deathcola.wordpress.com/ ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/201
HONOR OF INDIAN PALIAMENT FOR SALE
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/honor-of-indian-parliament-for-sale

Persecuted IROM SHARMILA of Puttaparthi AP pushpa kolasani on hunger strike in anantapur


district jail Andhra Pradesh
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/persecuted-irom-sharmila-of-puttaparthi-ap

9.
how many judges are caught by authorities for doing improper , immoral & illegal acts
, since independence till date ? what action taken in each case ?
10.
what action taken against copy cat judges caught red handed while copying in public
examination in Andhra Pradesh ?
11.
have you reviewed all the previous judicial decisions taken by such judges of doubtful
integrity & honesty ?
12.
is it not the duty of government & supreme court of India , to protect the fundamental
rights & human rights of all Indian citizens ?
13.
why the government & supreme court of India has failed to protect the fundamental
rights & human rights of me & those mentioned in my complaint ?
14.
wealth ?

how many former CJIs , supreme court & high court judges have disproportionate

15.
Your denial of information to my previous RTI requests amounts to suppression of
evidence , hiding crimes , what action against erring public servants ?
16.
why my previous RTI requests or part there of was not transferred to appropriate
authorities and information given to me in a consolidated form ?
Main E :
Q1. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who murder people in in lock-up / fake encounters ?
Q2. Why not death sentence to corrupt police who apply 3rd degree torture on prisoners ?
Q3. Why not death sentence to corrupt police , who connive with criminals & backstabs our
motherland , its national security ?
Q4. Dont the police have suo-motto powers to take action in the interest of public welfare , law &
order ?
Q5. Daily we see numerous reports of misdeeds by police , public servants , industrialists , etc in
the media . Then why not police taking any action with respect to them ?
Q6. nowadays we see numerous reports of scams , scandals by constitutional functionaries ,
public servants in the media. Instead of wasting money , killing time by prolonging formation of
parliamentary committees , judicial commissions , why not subject those accussed public
servants to narco analysis , lie deector test , etc to ascertain truth & provide timely justice ?
Q7. If a commonman files a complaint , police / courts wants evidences , witnesses to take action
against the rich & mighty crooks. Where as if a rich person just gives a complaint against a poor
chap , he is arrested , tortured eventhough there are no evidences , witnesses. Why this double
standard ?
Q8. If a poor chap tries to collect evidences as per his fundamental rights or as per RTI ACT , the
public servants dont give full , truthfull information. Still , police / courts dont take action against
those public servants hiding crimes. Why ?
Q9.why I was not permitted to appear as an amicus curie before jain commission of enquiry or
supreme court of india probing late prime minister rajiv Gandhi assassination case ?
Q10. The criminal nexus tried to silence me , by closing my news paper , by snatching away my

job oppurtunities in government service, by physically assaulting me , by threatening me of false


fix-ups in cases & by attempts to murder me. But no action against culprits , why ?
Q11. Whereas , I was enquired number of times by police & intelligence personnel about this
case , but the culprits were not enquired even once , why ?
Q12.who compensates the losses I have suffered due to these injustices ? are not police
responsible for it ?
Q13. Is it not the duty of police to protect the lives , livelihood of witnesses & all parties involved ,
both during case & afterwards ?
Q14. How do you monitor & check corrupt police personnel & increase in their familys wealth
year after year ?
Q15. While getting appointed into government service from the rank of peon to IAS officer , police
verification is mandatory. While appointing to sensitive defense establishments , research
institutes in addition to police verification , central intelligence agencies cross-check candidates
background. However is there no background checks of constitutional functionaries , MPs ,
MLAs , , who are privy to national secrets ? why ?
Q16. Recently , the opposition parties have made allegations during presidential allegations that
close relative of one of the front running candidates have swindled public money by their bank ,
misused public money through one of their NGO. Is it true ?
Q17.has GOI funded any terrorist outfits in india or abroad ?
Q18.india preaches non-violence , panchasheel principles to the world. In india , more than half
the population are poor , people are starving to death. Inspite these background , GOI funded &
aided terrorist outfits in former east Pakistan ensuring the creation of Bangladesh , GOI has
funded & aided terrorist outfits like LTTE , TULF , ETC in srilanka , MQM in Pakistan. In turn these
terrorist outfits have murdered thousands of innocents in those countries. Are these acts of GOI
just & legal ? Is not GOI responsible for all those murders of innocents ? has GOI paid any
compensation to those victims or their family mebers ? why not ?
Q19.within india , to reduce the influence of certain terrorist groups , GOI has funded & aided
couter terrorist groups , is it right & legal ?
Q20. In Jharkhand , chattisgarh , etc , the government has armed , trained & funded salwa
judum to counter naxalites. Salwa judum cadres are terrorizing innocents just like naxalites. Is
this action of government just & legal ?
Q21.in india, TADA , POTA is being rampantly misused by police. Even where there are no
problems of terrorism , TADA / POTA is being slapped against innocents , even children. In
M.M.Hills of Karnataka state , STF personnel charged tribal people with TADA on frivolous charges
of taking lunch to veerappan , stiching dress for the forest brigand, etc. where as the prominent
political, film , sports personalities who have links with underworld , anti national elements &
attended parties hosted by dawood Ibrahim , other dons in gulf countries , else where. But these
hi-fi people are not charged with TADA / POTA ? why ?
Q22. Film actor sanjay dutt had contacts with underworld & fully knowing well the criminal
objectives of criminals , hid the dangerous arms & ammunition in his home , which were intended
for terrorizing public. However mr.dutt is not charged with TADA / POTA instead he is charged with
illegal possession of arms act ( which is normally applied to farmers who use illegal home made
guns to scare away animals , birds in their farms ). Why this favourable treatment of mr.dutt by
police ? prosecution ? is this because dutt is politically mighty & rich ?
Q23. Law is one & same for all , the public servants, police interpretes , enforces it differentially
between rich & poor ? why this differentiation ?
Q24.recently in Bangalore police nabbed criminals belonging to international criminal syndicate
selling duplicate nokia mobiles. Every nokia mobile comes with 15 digit IMEI number , this number
is also used by police for tracking criminals. In consumer dispute at consumer disputes redressal
forum Mysore CD 49/05 , nokia company stated that all its products come with IMEI number only
& stated that the product in dispute sold by tata indicom dealer M/S INTOTO COMMUNICATIONS ,
Mysore are not theirs as it doesnt have IMEI numbers. Further nokia stated they dont have any
business relationship with either tata indicom or its dealer. However the tata indicom dealer
stated that indeed his products are genuine , first hand products , but doesnt have IMEI

numbers . this proves the dealer in collusion with tata company is selling illegal nokia mobile
hand sets & cheating the public. These mobiles are evading taxes , as well as these are without
IMEI numbers best buy for criminal elements who want to evade police tracking. What police are
doing
Q25. Who , of which rank among police personnel takes the decision to close a case ie to file B
report , when after certain time limit no leads are found in investigation ?
Q26. How do you monitor corrupt police personnel , who purposefully fail to investigate case
properly , so that either the case can be closed with B report or the prosecution fails to prove
the case in court ?
Q27. Who among police takes the decision to appeal against the verdict of a lower court , when
the prosecution fails ?
Q28. Who took the decision , not to appeal against the argentina court order acquitting
mr.quatrochi accussed in bofors scandal ?
Q29. Do you treat all the prison convicts same in the prison or does the notorious big time rich
criminals get spacious barracks with tv, news paper , adequate food , medical care , etc while
small time criminals , poor are crammed into pig sty like rooms with 60-70 inmates without any
basic requirements ?
Q30. What is the status of my complaint made to the DG & IG of police , government of Karnataka
on 10/12/2004 ? the copies of complaint was released at press meet at patrakartara bhavan
Mysore on same day, even copies were given to police & intelligence personnel ?
Q31. Why no action , reply regarding the complaint till date ?
Q32. Our constitutional frame workers gave legal immunity privileges to certain constitutional
functionaries , so that they are not burdened with frivolous court cases & can concentrate on their
constitutional duties. But these privileges doesnt cover the individual actions of those public
servants like rape , murder , dowry harassment , tax evasion , misuse of office , etc. but still law
enforcement / police department is bound to send request to home ministry seeking permission &
home ministry sits over files for months. This gives the accussed ample time to destroy
evidences. Is it right & legal ?
Q33. Does legal immunity privileges cover their official actions alone ? if not what does it cover ?
Q34. What is the time limit for home ministry to give sanction for the prosecution of tainted
constitutional functionaries ?
Q35. How many present MPs , MLAs , MUNICIAPAL CORPORATORS , other peoples
representatives are facing criminal charges ?
Q36. In the past , how many MPs , MLAs , corporators were facing criminal charges , yearwise
since 1987 ? how many of them were eventually convicted ?
Q37. How many MPs , MLAs , prominent film , sports personalities have have contacts with
underworld , foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q38. How many of them have attended frequent parties hosted by underworld dons in gulf
countries , else where ?
Q39. How many MP , MLA , other peoples representatives are wanted by police in various cases .
but shown in the police records as absconding but in reality are attending the proceedings of the
house as usual ?
Q40. When did smt. Sonia Gandhi became a citizen of india ? did she occupy any public office
before naturalization ?
Q41. In india , how many MPs , MLAs , MLCs are of foreign origin or have a spouse of foreign
origin ?
Q42. Does smt. Sonia Gandhi have citizenship of any other country ?
Q43. Did she occupy any public office while enjoying dual citizenship ?
Q44. How do you monitor public servants who have spouses of foreign origin & while they are on
foreign tour , from national security perspective ?
Q45. Is mr. M.S SUBBA member of parliament a citizen of india ?
Q46. What is the status of complaint made by former union minister mr.subramanya swamy
alleging that late P.M rajiv gandhis family received money from foreign intelligence agencies ?
Q47. In many cases like mass riots involving certain political parties , when that culprit party

comes to power all the cases involving its partymen are withdrawn by the government orelse
prosecution fails to prove its case & prefers not to appeal. Just remember Bombay riot case
involving shiv sainiks & others , when shiv sena BJP came to power in Maharashtra , all the
cases against its partymen were withdrawn. Are these type of decisions by government just &
legal ?
Q48.what damages has been done to indias national security due to mole in the PMO, as alleged
by former union minister mr.natwar singh ?
Q49. What action by the government ?
Q50. How many Indians are in the custody of police / military in various foreign countries ?
Q51. How many foreigners are there in Indian prisons ?
Q52. How GOI is protecting the human rights of these prisoners ?
Q53. Is the government paying any compensation to victims of police failures , fix-ups , , who
suffer in jail for years & acquitted by courts upon finding them as not guilty ?
Q54. Do you register murder charges / attempt to murder charges against guilty police officers
who are responsible for lock-up deaths , fake encounters & 3 rd degree torture ?
Q55. How many cases has been filed since 1987 till date ?
Q56. What action has been taken against guilty police officers , STF personnel who were
responsible for gross human rights violations , 3rddegree torture , lock-up deaths of innocents in
forest brigand veerappans territory , based on justice A.J.Sadashiva commission findings ? if not
why ?
Q57. I , as a citizen of india as my fundamental duty hereby do offer my conditional services to
GOI & GOK to apprehend corrupt public servants. Are you ready to utilize my services ?
Q58. Police personnel are always in the forefront of containing crimes , mass fury , riots , etc. they
suffer more & even their family members suffer threats from the criminal elements. Do the
government provide insurance coverage to police & their family members on the lines of defense
forces ?
Q59. What is the amount of coverage to a police constable & his family ?
Q60. Who makes the premium contributions ?
Q61. Do the government provide overtime allowance , food allowance to police who daily work
beyond 8 hours of duty ?
Q62. Is the government giving any training to police personnel in public interaction , human rights
?
Q63. Is it right to post professionally trained police to sentry , orderly duties of ministers ?
Q64. What is the ratio of police personnel to total population in india since 1987 ?
Q65. IS THE GOVERNMENT GIVING ADEQUATE FOOD, MEDICAL CARE , CLOTHING , LIVING
SPACE TO PRISON INMATES , AS REQUIRED BY A NORMAL HUMAN EING ACCORDING TO W.H.O
NORMS ?
Q66. Is the forensic science department which conducts narcfo-analysis , lie-detector test , etc
under the control of police department ?
Q67. Is it not right to put it under impartial control of NHRC or like bodies ?
Q68. Is the action of some police officers arranging compromise meetings & subtly insisting the
poor to tow the line of rich or else face the consequences , is it right & legal ? this happens mostly
in real estate matters.
Q69. Did government make any ransom payments to forest brigand veerappan during his various
kidnappings ?
Q70. What action has been taken based on revealations by karim telgi during narco analysis about
public servants involvement ?
Q71. How many cases of allegations against judges were made in the media about misuse of
office , criminal acts by judges from munsiff court to supreme court of India ? since 1947 till date
Q72. are the enquiry report findings, action taken reports of such cases accessible to public ? if
not why ?
Q73. what action has been taken against guilty judges ?
Q74. are the guilty judges legally prosecuted in all such cases ? or has it just ended with their
resignation from services or his superior judge not allotting him any judicial work ?

Q75. why some high ranking judges are not legally prosecuted for their wrong doings ?
Q76. are judges above law ? are not everybody equal before law ?
Q77. do the judiciary subject , all the cases handled by accussed / tainted , guilty judges to
review , to undo past unjust judgements ?
Q78. how ? if not why ?
Q79. how do the judiciary monitor the net wealth growth of some judges including the wealth in
the name of judges family members ?
Q80. do all the judges file their annual income , wealth statements on sworn affidavits to the
higher judiciary ? defaulters how many ?
Q81. how does the judiciary verifies those statements ?
Q82. is such statements made public , on web ?
Q83. when the judgement of a lower court is turned down by the higher court , what action is
initiated against lower court judge for making unjust judgement & meating out injustice ?
Q84. when allegations of corruption , misuse of office , etc against judges are made , why the
accussed judges are not subjected to tests like poly graph , lie detector , brain mapping , etc ,
in the interest of justice & truth ?
Q85. judges are not employees of government , so they are ineligible to be the members of
Karnataka state government judicial department house building co-operative society. Then how
come , many judges including supreme court judges are admitted as members of this society &
allotted prime residential site worth crores of rupees for a few thousands by the said society at
said societys judicial layout , yelahanka , Bangalore ? while the ordinary members like peons ,
clerks in judicial department are waiting for a site since years , is not the whole thing grossly
illegal ?
Q86. in more than 70% of cases before all courts in India , central government or state
government or government agency is one of the parties. How many judges or their family
members , have received out of turn , favourable allotments of sites , gas agency , petrol pumps ,
etc by the government ? is not such allotments illegal ? what action ?
Q87. when a person under police custody or judicial custody suffer 3 rd degree torture by police , is
not the judge of the respective court which is handling that tortured persons case responsible for
it ?
Q88. has the higher judiciary legally prosecuted respective judges & the police officers for
committing 3rd degree torture , on charges of attempt to murder & murder ? if not why ?
Q89. registrar , Mysore district & sessions court , has called for the candidatures to various
vacancies in that court from the public vide notification no : ADMN/A/10825/2003 dated 19/11/2003.
Please furnish me the merit ranking list of selected candidates along with my merit ranking for the
post of peon.
Q90. registrar , Bangalore city civil court , has called for the candidatures to various vacancies in
that court from the public vide notification no : ADM-I(A)422/03 dated 19/05/2003. Please furnish
me merit ranking list of selected candidates for the post of peon.
Q91. when a person doesnt get adequate food , medical care while under police custody or
judicial custody , is not the respective judge dealing that persons case responsible for it ? what
action ?
Q92. how judiciary is monitoring food & medical care to prisoners ?
Q93. numerous accussed persons are suffering in jail under judicial custody , for periods far
exceeding the legally stipulated sentence periods. For example : a pick-pocketer is in jail for one
year , the judge finds him guilty of offence & gives him 3 months sentence. What about the excess
punishment of 9 months. Is not the judge responsible for the illegal , excess punishment of the
convict ? what action against the judge in such cases ?
Q94. numerous innocents suffer in jail for years & finally the judge finds them as innocents &
acquits them of the charges. What about the prison sentence , the innocent has already served ?
is not the judge responsible for this illegal , unjust punishment to an innocent ? remedy ? what
action against the judge ?
Q95. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions & the actions arising out of
misuse of office ?

Q96. does the privileges of judges cover both their official actions as judges & their personal
actions as individuals ?
Q97. are the fundamental rights of citizens supreme or the privileges of judges , constitutional
functionaries supreme ?
Q98. what is the criteria adopted for promotion of judges ?
Q99. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of advocates from bar , as the judges ?
Q100. what is the criteria adopted for appointment of retired judges , as governors of states ,
members or as chairman of commissions , etc ?
Q101. how many judges belonging to oppressed classes scheduled caste , scheduled tribe ,
other backward classes , minorities & women are their in supreme court , state high courts &
subordinate courts ? kindly provide specific figures .
Q102. what are the legal measures enforced by judiciary , to enforce the accountability of judges
& to check corruption in judiciary ?
Q103. are not these measures a failure , looking at present state of affairs of judiciary ?
Q104. does the judges arrange for distribution of alchoholic drinks at the official meetings ,
parties , at the tax payers expense ?
Q105. does any judges have included their consumption of alchoholic drinks , in their hotel bill &
claimed traveling allowance ?
Q106. what action has been taken against selectors ie Karnataka high court judges & newly
selected women judges involved in roost resort scandal in Mysore , Karnataka ?
Q107. when common people / tax payers & even government employees are not getting proper
health care from government at government hospitals. Is it right & just to provide premium health
care to judges , constitutional functionaries at 5-star private hospitals in India , abroad , all at tax
payers expense ?
Q108. are the judges subjected to periodical health check-ups to ascertain their health , mental
faculties & mental balance in the midst of all work pressures , emotional tensions ?
Q109. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary for accepting applications seeking public interest
litigations ?
Q110. why numerous appeals for PIL by me , were not considered ?
Q111. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for appointing amicus curie in a case ?
Q112. why my appeal to honourable supreme court , to make me as an amicus curie in late P.M
Rajiv Gandhis assassination case , was not considered by the court ?
Q113. what is the criteria adopted by judiciary , for initiating suo-motto action ?
Q114. numerous cases of injustices are reported in the media daily , with supporting evidences .
why not the judiciary take suo-motto action in all such cases ?
Q115. legal aid boards pre-judge the cases in the name of taking legal opinion , before providing
legal aid to the needy ? is it not needy persons rights violation ?
Q116. is not the safety of witnesses , parties in cases responsibility of the court , both during
hearing of the case & afterwards ?
Q117. is the use of 3rd degree torture by police on prisoners , during the police custody / judicial
custody / prison sentence right ? what action ?
Q118. when the corrupt police officer & government prosecution advocate together cover-up
evidences , conducts improper investigation intentionally to fail the case to cover-up rich crooks
, high & mighty people , what action judge takes in such cases ?
Q119. how does the judiciary monitor the wealth growth of police , government advoctes , tax
officials , officials of licensing authorities , to ensure proper & fair prosecution of cases against
rich & mighty ?
Q120. what are the status of appeals made by human rights activist NAGARAJ.M.R. to the
honourable supreme court of India ?
Q121. corruption is rampant for selection of officers to quasi-judicial positions like district / taluk
magistrates , tax officers , revenue officers , land acquisition officers , etc. how the judiciary
monitors over their quasi-judicial actions ?
Q122. subject to conditions , I , NAGARAJ.M.R. , editor , e-voice of human rights watch , do offer
my free services to honourable supreme court of India , to apprehend corrupt judges , are

you the honourable court ready to utilize it ?


Q123. what are the status of my appeals , sent to the honourable supreme court of India , through
government of indias on-line grievance system ( DPG & DARPG ) :
DPG/M/2006/80008 , DARPG/E/2006/00057, DARPG/E/2006/00225 , DPG/M/2006/80021 ,
DARPG/E/2006/00253 , DPG/M/2006/80032 , DARPG/E/2006/01149 , DPG/M/2006/80047 ,
DARPG/E/2006/01164 , DPG/M/2006/80043 , DPG/M/2006/80085 , DARPG/E/2006/06704 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07017 , DARPG/E/2006/07018 , DPG/M/2006/80159 , DPG/M/2006/80162 ,
DARPG/E/2006/07864 , DPG/M/2006/80165 , DARPG/E/2006/07877 , DPG/M/2006/80167 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08028 , DARPG/E/2006/08029 , DARPG/E/2006/08032 , DARPG/E/2006/08043 ,
DARPG/E/2006/08044 , DPG/M/2006/80174 , DPG/M/2006/80193 , DARPG/E/2007/00044 ,
DPG/M/2007/80003 , DPG/M/2007/80010 , DARPG/E/2007/00164 , DARPG/E/2007/00165 ,
DPG/M/2007/80014 , DPG/M/2007/80025 , DPG/M/2007/80049 , DPG/M/2007/80055 ,
DPG/M/2007/80056 , DPG/M/2007/80078 , DPG/M/2007/80082 , DARPG/E/2007/02618
Q124. the appeals made to the honourable supreme court of India , copies of which are available
at following web pages
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/182 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/206 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/208 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/212 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw/message/209 ,
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/naghrw
what are the status of those appeals ?
Q125. in the media , we have seen reports about judges committing crimes rape , attempt to
murder , swindling government money , untouchability practice , the disrespect to national flag ,
sale of judicial orders , bail , receipt of monetary gains by way of royalty for books , prime real
estate purchase at discounted rate , taking round about long foreign tours along with family in the
name of official work , etc. by this way , judges themselves are making contempt of court ,
constitution of India & citizens of India. How you are protecting the honour of the judiciary ,
constitution of India & citizens of India ? please answer.
Q126. Is the government giving any facilities / affirmative actions to policemens family as being
given to defense personnel , ex-servicemen & their families , like preferential site allotment , lpg
agency , ration depot , reservation in college admission , soft bank loans , etc ?
Q126. if not , why ? after all , the contribution of police to national security is on par with defense
forces.
Q127. is not some high police officials addressing their subordinates in singular term , abusing
them with vulgar words wrong ?
Q128. is not some police personnel calling public with singular term, abusing public with vulgar
words wrong ?
Q129. is it not the duty of prison authorities to protect the health, lives of prison in-mates ?
Q130.what action is taken against police personnel who wrongly charged an innocent person of
criminal acts , resulting in his confinement in jail , finally acquitted by court as found to be
innocent ?
Q131. is it not right to with hold salary , gratuity , pension to such guilty police personnel & pay it
as compensation to victims of police failures & atrocities ?
Q132. does our Indian constitution legally permit a citizen of foreign origin naturalized by
marriage to an Indian or naturalized by option , to occupy any constitutional office ?
Q133. during british rule in india & various other british colonies , criminal cases were foisted
against our freedom fighters in India & other british colonies. After indias independence what
happened to those cases ? did our Indian government close all such cases or did it continue with
the prosecution ?
Q134. in how many cases GOI & other state government continued with the prosecution AGAINST
OUR FREEDOM FIGHTERS ? why ?
Q135. what about the status of cases against shri.netaji subash Chandra bose ?
Q136. has GOI deported any freedom fighters to Britain or its colonies , to face prosecution after

India gained independence ? HAS GOI RECEIVED ANY REQUEST FROM BRITAIN TO THAT
EFFECT ? if yes , why , whom ?
Q.137. the honourable supreme court of India failed provide information to me as per my RTI
request appeal no : 91 / 2007 in response to your letter no : F1 / RTI / A.91 / 2007 dt 13.12.07 ,
why ?
Q138 . the honourable union home secretary failed to give me information as per my rti request ,
he transferred my application to others , in turn they transferred the application to some others.
Finally , complete truthful information was not given , why ? as the union home secretary has got
copies of all those replies in response to transferred RTI application , will he send me a
consolidated reply to my present RTI request ?
Q139. in a high profile case before the honourable delhi high court , we have seen how defense
advocate mr. R.S.ANAND & prosecution advocate mr. I.U.KHAN made a secret pact to win the case
in favour of rich criminal , totally manipulating prosecution witnesses , evidences & prosecution
stand , totally making mockery of justice system . how you are ensuring the delivery of justice ,
there being numerous such advocates in practice ?
Q140. Smt. Sonia Gandhi is person of foreign origin , she wields enormous clout more than the
Prime Minister himself over the government of India being the chair person of UPA. Is she legally
permitted to summon confidential official records , minutes of the cabinet , to hold the cabinet
meeting of union ministers ?
Q141. As per law , is she permitted to hold constitutional offices like prime minister of India or
president of India , etc ?
Q.142. What are the fundamental rights of a citizen guaranteed under the constitution (Article
21) ?
Q143. What are the privileges conferred on legislators & parliamentarians by the constitution of
India?
a) Inside the House b) Outside the House
Q144. What are privileges conferred on constitutional functionaries, like
a) President of India b) Prime Minister of India
c) Chief Justice of India d) Chairman of NHRC
e) Central Vigilance Commissioners.
Q145. Are the privileges legal immunity conferred on above mentioned constitutional
functionaries ?
a) Cover all their official actions irrespective of merit.
b) Cover both their official & personal actions.
Q146. Are the privileges defined & codified ?
Q147. Are these privileges above freedom of the press ?
Q148. Are the liberty & fundamental rights of the citizens guaranteed by the constitution, above
the privileges of the constitutional functionaries or equal or below ?
Q149. Can the Indian legislatures & parliament be equated to the House of commons in England
which is considered to be a superior court and court of records ?
Q150. Can the division of powers, namely the legislature, the executive and the Judiciary, be
equated to the functioning of the House of commons and House of Lords in England ?
Q151. Can a citizen be said to have committed breach of privilege of the House or court and
causing contempt of the house or court by raising the issues of accountability of constitutional
functionaries ?

Q152. Can a Legislature or Parliament enact a new law, to circumvent or to nullify the Judicial
orders with respect to wrongdoings by peoples representatives & executive ? does not it amount
to infringement of Judicial powers & contempt of the court by the House.
Q153. Are the FUNDAMENTAL DUTIES of a citizen more important than constitutional duties of a
constitutional functionary or equal in importance to it ?
Q154. Can a constitutional functionary commit crimes, anti-national activities in the name of
constitutional duties, behind the legal veil of officials secret act & go unaccountable for his
actions and go unpunished by his legal immunity privileges
Q155. Are the Legislators members of parliament, High court & Supreme court Judges and other
constitutional functionaries not willing to codify their privileges for the reason that if codified their
privileges would be curtailed and their action would be subjected to legal scrutiny. ?
Q156. By votes of citizens Legislators and parliamentarians get seats in the legislature and
Parliament out of tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-Star luxurious lifestyles.
Hence whether a vote of a citizen is above (More valid) or a seat of legislator or parliamentarian is
above or more valid in a democracy ?
Q157. Judges & Constitutional functionaries are indirectly appointed by voters / tax payers. Out of
tax payers money, they get their pay, perks & lead 5-star luxurious lifestyles. Hence, whether the
vote of a citizen, fundamental duties of a tax payer is above (more valid) or a seat of judge /
constitutional functionary is above (more
valid) in a democracy ?
Q158. If there is a vacuum in the Legislature or parliament, who is to fill up that vacuum till such
time that the legislature or parliament acts provide a solution by performing its role by enacting
proper legislation to cover the field (vacuum) ?
Q159. While it is an unhealthy practice for a Judge to claim to be a Judge in his own cause, is it
not worse for the members of the legislature and parliament to be judges in their own cause ?
Q160. Are the Technicalities of the case more important to a judge or Justice to a citizen,
protection of fundamental rights of citizen.?
Q161. Why not the constitutional functionaries initiate suo moto action with respect to numerous
cases of injustices reported in Media ?
Q162. Why not the Judges admit various cases of Injustices affecting public, as the Public Interest
Litigation ? In some cases, the Public or the person representing them is unable to afford the
high cost of the case. Why not free legal aid is given ?.
Q163. What is the criteria for admitting a P.I.L. & giving free legal aid ?
Q164. Communication free flow of information is the lifeline of a democracy. Why the
constitutional functionaries are not honouring the Right to Information of Citizens ?
Q165. Recently , while assuming office as honourable chief justice of Karnataka , justice.
P.D.DINAKAR , gave a blanket withdrawal of all internal departmental enquiries against
approximately 200 judges , is it just & legal ? give me the names of accused judges & description
of charges against them ?
Q166. does it not show that judges are more equal than others ?
Q167. who are involved in PF scam ? what action against guilty judges ?
Q168. Why you did not give information to me as per RTI Act inspite of appeal ? refer.
F1/RTI/A91/2007.
Q169. Almost a year ago , in the Karnataka state new chief justice of Karnataka high court honble
Mr.Dinakar (now elevated to supreme court of India) just on assuming offices within hours
scrapped disciplinary inquiry proceedings against 200+ erring judges. In such a short time no
human being can study all the cases in detail , then how come he arrived at this vital decision in
such short time? Who are those 200+ judges facing enquiry ?
Q170 .Recently in the Karnataka state , high court found out that a district judge without

conducting hearings properly , entering fictious dates of hearings (which happens to be


government holidays ) facilitated in exonerating a top politician . has the court enquired into the
previous judgements of the accussed judge ? did it find any wrongdoings?
Q171. As per law , while on duty a person should not be drunk , under the influence of alchohol ,
as it limits the functioning of his senses & brain. That is why the acts & sayings of drunkards ,
committed / said when they are drunk are not taken seriously. However most of the police officers
after evening hours are drunk , in that state only they apprehend many suspects & produce those
suspects at the residences of magistrates before magistrate during wee hours / night. Some of of
the judges are also drunk during that time. Does the senses of drunken police & judges work
properly to do their respective duties in identifying criminals , apprehending them & to issue
judicial orders. Are these actions of police & judges in drunken state legal ?
Q 172 . What action has been taken in bhopal gas leak case against the guilty police officials who
changed the charge sheet against union carbide officials ?
Q 173 . What action has been taken against guilty police officials , district magistrate , state
ministers & central ministers who fully aided the criminals Union Carbide official Mr. Anderson
to escape law , to jump bail & flee the country without courts permission ?
Q 174 . What action has been taken against the above said guilty with respect to their contempt of
court & for aiding a criminal to escape ?
Q 175. What action has been taken against the chief justice of India , who changed the legal
clause under which the guilty should be tried ? what action has been taken against the CJI who
became an official of the trust belonging to the criminal ?
Q 176 . What action has been taken against the Indian Public servant who decided to withdraw
cases from US Courts with respect to Bhopal gas tragedy ?
Q 177 . What action has been taken against the state labour department & pollution control board
officials who have failed in their duties , inspite of earlier warnings by journalists ?
Q 178 . What action has been taken against state cabinet ministers who decided the quantum of
compensation money to favour the criminal although they dont have right to do so ?
Q 179 . What action has been taken against Presiding Judge of the trial court , Chief Justice of
India , state police officials , public prosecutors & Central Bureau of Investigation officials who
kept quite all along and didnt press for the extradition of the criminal Mr.Anderson , for
producing the criminal accussed no.1 before the trial court ?
Q 180 . Is it not SHAMEFUL for the judiciary , police , government officials & peoples
representatives who became part of Operation Crime Hush Up & aided criminals responsible for
ghastly murders of thousands & maiming of lakhs of hapless public in Bhopal Gas Leak Tragedy?
Q 181 . Are these Corrupt Police , corrupt judges , corrupt ministers , corrupt labour / pollution
control board officials HUMAN BEINGS ?
Q 182 Why police are not registering my complaint against CJI & other VVIPS ,Even after
years ?
Q 183 dont the police of vijayanagar police station mysore have legal jurisdiction to register
the case against these VVIPs ? or just because the criminals happens to be VVIPs ,they are not
booked by police? If the said police dont have legal jurisdiction to book these VVIPs , they
should have transferred the complaint to those authorities who have jurisdiction & authority to
book & prosecute these VVIPs , but not done so , why ?
Q 184 are not all these actions , of VVIPs & police amounting to cover up of crimes &
criminals ? are not these cover ups itself is a crime ?
Q 185. Even an appeal for justice by post card must be treated as PIL by courts of justice .
however my appeals for justice concerning public welfare , national security sent through
post , e-mail to supreme court of india are not admitted as Public interest litigation , why ? does
not these acts of Supreme court amount to aiding criminals , anti nationals?

Q 186 Are not the honourable chief justice of india together with the jurisdictional police &
Revenue district magistrate responsible to protect the fundamental & human rights of people ?
why the CJI , Mysore DC & Jurisdictional Police have failed to protect the fundamental & human
rights of people including mine ? For all the previous injustices I have suffered at the hands of
the criminal nexus Honourable CJI , Mysore revenue district magistrate & jurisdictional police
are together responsible , if anything untoward happens to me or to my family members or to my
dependents the quartet Honourable Chief Justice of India , Honourable District Magistrate ,
Mysore , Honourable Police Commissioner of Mysore city & Circle Inspector of police ,
vijayanagar police station , mysore will be responsible .
These corrupt parasites will feel , understand the pain only when they also suffer in the same
manner. Let us pray to almighty In whose Court of justice MATCH FIXING is not there & every
body is equal , let us pray to that god to give these corrupt parasites ghastly deaths nothing less
nothing more.

YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO


YEAR 1994-2014 . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
CPIO , SUPREME COURT OF INDIA , NEW DELHI.
FEES PAID : IPO 22F 282814 for rupees ten only
DATE : 29.03.2014 ..NAGARAJA.M.R.
PLACE : MYSORE , INDIA.. .( APPLICANT)

PAY UP Justice Sathasivam - DAMAGES PAYMENT / FINAL SHOW-CAUSE NOTICE TO CHIEF


JUSTICE OF INDIA
I dont know whether secretariat staff of CJI office & DARPG / DPG officials are forwarding
my appeals for justice , e-mails to you or not. They will be held accountable for their lapses if
any. This notice is against the repeated failure of constitutional duties & indirect collusion with
criminals by previous CHIEF JUSTICEs OF INDIA. Notice is served against them , to the office
of CJI , NOT personally against you. At the individual level I do whole heartedly respect
honourable justice Sathasivam.
Please refer my appeal for justice through DARPG ;
DLGLA/E/2013/00292
DEPOJ/E/2013/00679

In india democracy is a farce , freedom a mirage. the most basic freedom RIGHT TO
INFORMATION & EXPRESSION , is not honoured by the government,as the information opens up
the crimes of V.V.I.Ps & leads to their ill-gotten wealth. The public servants are least
bothered about the lives of people or justice to them. these type of fat cats , parasites are a drain
on the public exchequer . these people want ,wish me to see dead , wish to see HUMAN RIGHTS
WATCH closed . so that, a voice against injustices is silenced forever , the crimes
of V.V.I.Ps closed , buried forever.
To my numerous appeals , HRWs appeals to you ,you have not yet replied. It clearly shows that
you are least bothered about the lives of people or justice to them .it proves that you are hell bent
to protect the criminals at any cost. you are just pressurising the police to enquire me ,to take my
statement, to repeatedly call me to police station all with a view to silence me.all of you enjoy
legal immunity privileges ,why dont you have given powers to the police / investigating officer
to summon all of you for enquiry ?or else why dont all of you are not appearing before the police
voluntarily for enquiry ?at the least why dont all of you are not sending your statement about the
case to the police either through legal counsel or through post? you are aiding criminals ,by
denying me job oppurtunities in R.B.I CURRENCY NOTE PRESS mysore , city civil court
,bangalore , distict court , mysore ,etc & by illegally closing my newspaper.
there is a gross, total mismatch between your actions and your oath of office. this amounts to
public cheating & moral turpitude on your part.
1.you are making contempt of the very august office you hold.
2.you are making contempt of the constitution of india.
3.you are making contempt of citizens of india.
4.you are sponsoring & aiding terorrism & organized crime.
5.you are violating the fundamental & human rights of the citizens of india and of neighbouring
countries.
6.you are violating & making contempt of the U.N HUMAN RIGHTS CHARTER to which india is a
signatory.
7.you are obstructing me from performing my fundamental duties as a citizen of india.
8. As a result of your gross negligence of constitutional duties you have caused me damages /
losses to the tune of RUPEES TWO CRORE ONLY.
you are hereby called upon to Pay damages to me and SHOW-CAUSE within 30 days , why
you cannt be legally prosecuted for the above mentioned crimes .
If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of investigations , the losses i
do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc must be borne by the
government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me the complainant (sufferer of
injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called the guilty culprits even once to
police station for questioning , as the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided
questioning must not be done by police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens
to me or to my family members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives ,
etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned accussed public servants , Chief
Justice of India & Jurisdictional District Magistrate will be responsible for it. Even if criminal
nexus levels fake charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me ,
this complaint is & will be effective.
if anything untoward happens to me or my dependents , the government of india is liable to pay
Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my family. if my whole family is eliminated by the
criminal nexus ,then that compensation money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund.

afterwards , the money must be recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension ,
property , etc of guilty judges , police officials , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
Thanking you. Jai Hind , Vande Mataram.
Date : 19.03.2014..yours sincerely,
Place : Mysore , India.Nagaraja M R

RTI QUESTIONS HONOURABLE GOVERNOR OF RESEVE BANK OF INDIA IS


AFRAID TO ANSWER

SOILED NOTE FRAUD CASE @ RBI BANGALORE


-

Trauma of an old man

Complete case details also available


at http://members.lycos.co.uk/ganapathihariram/
As per allegations of RBI management Bangalore in 1977-79 , criminal
nexus of RBI employees stole Rs. 220000 from RBI Bangalore. All the
banks , government treasuries in Karnataka , submit defaced / soiled
currency notes to RBI Bangalore in exchange for good notes. RBI after
collecting such defaced currency notes , sorts out fairly good notes
which can be reissued & burns off the remaining totally defaced
currency notes. All these process is done in a systematic manner.
As per allegations of the management , the crime took place in the
period of 1977-79 at RBI Bangalore. A nexus of employees, took away
the currency bundles meant for destruction & substituted it in the
place of bundles of reissuables.
Charge sheet issued by RBI Bangalore office to mr.G.Hariram
Staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 1 april 1985
Amended charge sheet staff no 3798/156-84/85 dt 8 april 1985

CBI has charge sheeted 17 employees in connection with this case ,


case olde no. cc34/1989
new no. sc 436/1991
. the honourable
21 city additional city civil & sessions court Bangalore in it's order dated
24.01.1992
discharged

03 charge sheeted employees , as the prosecution

failed to prove the charges against them. They came out clean , as
they were innocents saddled with the crime done by others. One of the
charge sheeted employee who turned approver for the prosecution, has
given detailed account of the crime. Nowhere he has mentioned the
involvement of accussed no.15 mr.G.Hariram in the crime.
Even after coming out clean, mr.G.Hariram was not reinstated into
service by RBI. They gave the ruse of domestic enquiry & showed
contempt to the court order. On appeal, the honourable high court of
Karnataka ordered RBI to review it's order with respect to
mr.G.Hariram , still RBI failed to reinstate mr.G.Hariram into service
, once gain showing contempt to the court of law.
In India as per law , the decisions of court of law are binding on all
, orders of court over rides the organisation's internal rules ,
service rules , etc. inspite of lack of evidences, in a whimsical
manner the higher authorities of RBI , fixed some innocents as the
scape goats heaped all charges against them ( against whom they had
personal grudge , dislikes ). RBI repeatedly showed contempt to the
court orders , dismissed the scape goat - ailing old man mr.G.Hariram
from service. RBI snatched away his PF money towards the alleged loss
to the bank , didn't pay his gratuity amount , salary arrears and
finally he was even deprived of the pension. As a result , the old man
has even lost his social prestige, dignity , his family suffered a lot
& he is a mental wreck today.

Why RBI authoroties are hell bent upon to send away the innocents /
scape goats away from service ? why CBI didn't conduct polygraph tests
of all the accussed , specifically higher officers of RBI , managers
of RBI office Bangalore ? probably the scape goats were aware of the
crimes master minded by higher ups & didn't co-operate with the higher
ups in their crimes. So, the criminals were afraid that the scape
goats will blurt out truth to the world , fixed non co-operating
innocents themselves as criminals.
Who will give justice to innocents like old man mr.G.Hariram & who
will bell the corrupt , criminals , fat cats of RBI ?

APPEAL UNDER SEC 19 (3) OF RTI ACT 2005 OF GOVERNMENT OF INDIA &
GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA

APPLICATION FOR INFORMATION AS PER RTI ACT 2005


( SEE RULE 22 OF RTI ACT 2005 )

FULL NAME OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.

ADDRESS OF THE APPLICANT : NAGARAJ.M.R.,


EDITOR , E-VOICE OF HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH,
# LIG-2 / 761, OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE,
HUDCO FIRST STAGE, LAXMIKANTANAGAR,

HEBBAL, MYSORE , KARNATAKA


PIN 570017.

DETAILS OF DOCUMENTS / WRITTEN STATEMENTS / INFORMATION REQUIRED :

HEREBY , I DO HUMBLY REQUEST YOU TO GIVE ME WRITTEN STATEMENTS /


ANSWERS TO THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS - WHICH IN ITSELF ( ie answers )
ARE THE INFORMATION SOUGHT BY ME.
WITH RESPECT TO CASE NO old CC34 / 1989 & NEW NO SC436/1991 AT 21
ST ADDITIONAL CITY CIVIL & SESSIONS COURT BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEETED OFFICER MR.G.HARIRAM RBI BANGALORE
CHARGE SHEET NO staff no.3698/156/84-85 dt 01.01.1985
Amended charge sheet staff no.3798/156-84/85 dt 08.04.1985

1. Why didn't you notice the alleged crimes of 1977 , 78 & 79 till the
mid of 1979 ?
2. This crime came to light only due to anonymous phone calls of good
Samaritans to authorities , but not due to your inspection . is your
inspection division working properly ?
3. why there is no security check up of officers during entry & exit
out of premises ?

4. why there is no individual weighment , individual statement of


value of bags of reissuable notes & bags of note meant for destruction
, after sorting is done, why they are not tallied with total weight ,
value of notes issued for sorting ?
5. Immediately after noticing the crime, why did not you transfer all
the employees of those sections ?
6. why did not you take steps to preserve3 & protect respective
documents relating to such high profile crime ?
7. why didn't you immediately issue charge sheet to all the accussed &
waited till 1983 ?
8. Why RBI has left out , so many officers ( who worked in the same
sections for more period than accused officers ) from domestic enquiry ?
9. why CBI also failed to put those people in the charge sheet before
the court ?
10. is it because they were in favorable terms with the vested interests ?
11. did the CBI dance to the tune of vested interests in RBI while
preparing charge sheet & during investigation , instead of
independent investigation ?
12. those left out probables from the charge sheet might have caused
the destruction of evidences / records. During the course of domestic
enquiry / court proceedings , it has been recorded that some records
have been destroyed. Are not CBI & RBI responsible for destruction of
evidences , aiding true criminals get away ?

13. in normal times , what is the period specified in RBI regulations


for preserving old documents / records ?
14. after noticing such a high profile crime the RBI must have taken
utmost care to preserve such old records for indefinite time , for
producing before courts of law as & when demanded. But it didn't , why ?
15. does not this point to connivance of higher authorities of RBI ,
with the criminals ?
16. RBI authorities have conducted domestic mass enquiries , instead
of individual enquiries , is it not detrimental to the rights of defense ?
17. RBI authorities have stated that court proceedings & domestic
enquiry are independent of each other & are not binding on one
another. However RBI authorities straight away took on record of
domestic enquiry the court statements , evidences , but didn't honour
the order of same court of law ? why this double standard by RBI ?
18. The alleged crime was committed in 1977-79, but charge sheet was
framed in mid 1985 , why this long delay ?
19. didn't this facilitate the masterminds of crime to destroy ,
manipulate evidences ?
20. as stated before court , indeed some records , 22nd currency note
packet were missing , who is responsible for it ?
21. has the CBI conducted enquiry , polygraph test of RBI higher
officers - S.N.RAZDAN , W.S.SARAF , J.P.AWASTHI , J.MITRA & others ,

if not why ?
22. is it not due to inefficiency , negligence of duty by such high
ranking managers , that such a crime occurred in RBI Bangalore ?
23. what disciplinary action RBI has taken against the inefficient ,
negligent higher officials ?
24. whatever internal rules an organization makes must be within the
line of law. If such internal laws of the organization are violative
of law , fundamental rights of employees , such internal rules become
illegal. Are not the way of RBI disciplinary proceedings illegal ?
25. as per RBI pension regulations 1990 , RBI has the right to deduct
any loss caused to the bank , from the pension of RBI employee if the
misconduct of employee is proved in judicial proceedings . even though
mr.G.Hariram came out clean from the court , why RBI has denied his
pension ?
26. judicial courts of law are appellate authorities over & above ,
domestic enquiry committees & judicial orders supersedes the domestic
enquiry proceedings. Still RBI showed contempt of court & didn't
reinstate mr..G.Hariram into service , why ?
27. even if an employee's misconduct causing loss to the bank is
proved , before denying him pension (towards making up loss to the
bank) , previous sanction of the central board of RBI must be taken.
But in mr.G.Hariram's case , pension was denied in full without taking
previous sanction of the central board of RBI , is it not illegal ?
28. RBI alleged that mr..G.Hariram caused loss to the tune of Rs.14000

to the bank & recovered it from his provident fund dues. There was
nothing left over to recover , still RBI completely denied pension to
mr.G.Hariram , why ?
29. ideally, domestic enquiry findings / disciplinary actions should
be completed first , then the employee can appeal to appropriate court
of law. In mr.G.Hariram's case , CBI & RBI failed to prove the charges
in court of law , as a result court discharged him from the charges.
To cover-up it's failures RBI management dragged domestic enquiry much
beyond court orders date & gave findings indicting mr..G.Hariram. does
the enquiry officer of domestic enquiry think that he is over & above
the court of law ? is it not illegal & contempt of court ?
30. ideally , RBI authorities should have appealed to higher court
against lower court order discharging mr.G.Hariram from charges. But
it was not done , why ?
31. did the RBI pay interim relief to mr.G.Hariram , during suspension
period ?
32. the undue delay in filing charge sheet , consequent destruction of
key evidences , dishonour / contempt of court orders , undue haste in
giving findings , dismissal , denial of of pension without central
board's sanction , all point towards criminals within RBI higher
management. What disciplinary action has been taken against
J.P.AWASTHI, S.N.RAZDAN,J.MITRA, W.SARAF & others ? if not why ?
33. why charge sheet was amended? Is it legal ?
34. did the charge sheet was amended to falsely implicate
mr..G.Hariram , by including cancelled note vault in the charge sheet ?

35. does not this itself show that it is not statement of actual
happenings / facts , but a cunning ploy to mislead investigation
towards fixed innocents from actual criminals ?
36. is it true that that only 5% of sample inspection is done out of bundled
verified defective note packets ?
37. is not the conduct of joint / mass enquiries of all charge sheeted officers
illegal ?
38. how come such an important evidence 22 nd note packet went missing ?
39. is it because it may point towards real criminals ?
40. as per the statement of management witness / inspection head / expert
mr.vijendra rao , the notes of earlier dates have been removed from packets
made into new bundles , right ?
41. as per his statement , entire certificates , seals of some asst treasurers
are there , who didn't work at all on that day is not it ?
42. does not it show that some body else was misusing the seals , putting
some innocents seals over the notes ?
43. does it not show that , crime has taken place at verification section ?
44. does it not show involvement of some asst treasurers ?
45. why asst treasurers have not been charge sheeted ?
46. why inspection of RBI Bangalore office was not done between 1975 &
1979 ?

47. is it not true that you failed to produce all records showing internal
inspection / audits , during domestic enquiry & court proceedings ?
48. your expert mr.vijendra rao has stated that some seal marks are
smudged , he has stated some seal marks appears to be so & so. He has
clearly nowhere stated that this seal mark is exactly this , so he himself is
not 100% sure ?
49. your expert nowhere said that 100% sure this seal mark is this , on that
day this seal was issued to mr.G.Hariram , isn't it ?
50. your expert says during 1975 , he didn't notice3 any fraud. However
approver says fraud was there before mid 1977 also. Why no action has been
taken ?
51. why you didn't produce all records of all persons , who have specifically
worked in alleged sections , the registers of those departments with daily
activity report containing seal nos , packet nos , bag nos , etc ?
52. are not their chances of some criminals putting the seal marks of
innocent officers over the notes , bundles , bags , etc ?
53. your expert is not 100% sure of seal mark , your records are not there to
prove the presence of charge sheeted officers in the alleged sections ,
neither your expert nor your records are 100% sure on what date , at what
stage , by whom crime was committed , isn't it ?
54. is not the charge sheet amounting to higher ups picking up officers they
dislike & falsely implicating them ?
55. is it not cunning ploy of higher ups to divert attention from original
criminals ?

56. why no action was taken against currency officer of 1977-79 mr.J.Mitra ?
why his pension , super annuation benefits were not withheld ?
57. what is your justification , supporting evidence , records for picking up
only three officers including mr.G.Hariram for legal prosecution and leaving
the majority of probables ?
58. why you have dropped charges against five asst treasurers ? why you
didn't even conduct domestic enquiry against them , let alone legal
prosecution ?
59. Is it RBI's & CBI's way of fair play & justice ?
60. as inly 5% sampling of verified note bundles are done , there are more
possibilities of rebundled packets getting unnoticed in relaxed 95% lot , isn't
it ?
61. you have left out so many officers who worked in those sections, some
of whom even became management witnesses , instead of being charge
sheeted by the management, is it fair play & legal ?

62. who are the bank employees , from whom you have recovered the
alleged bank loss of Rs.220000 ?
63. were all of them charge sheeted , enquired , legally prosecuted ,
dismissed & their pension , gratuity withheld ?
64. you don't have any internal statuotary records to prove that
mr.G.Hariram worked in those departments , except a currency officer's
office note dated just on the eve of charge sheet years after the alleged
crime ? does it not prove that this note has been concocted just to fix
mr.G.Hariram ?

65. where as you have records of other officials attendance in those


departments , but not charge sheeted them why ?
66. three officers of staff grade A daily work in three sections out of 40
officers , why you have picked up only mr.G.Hariram , out of 1095 working
days , he has worked for only 223 days in those sections , still those officers
who worked for more days in those sections are not charge sheeted why ?
the approver , the management expert witness , shift registers , V2 registers
, Destruction certificates , Form CD 55 , etc , nobody , no records were able
to say on what date , at what stage , by whom crime took place , also they
were unable to say on what date at what stage crime was committed by
mr.G.Hariram ? is it not futile imagination , cunning ploy of RBI higher
authorities to fix innocent Mr.G.Hariram ?
67. the management expert witnesses said , the most probable place of
crime is punching / Cancelled Note Vault , incinerator , where asst
treasurers were joint custodians . they were not enquired & let off why ?
68.
the charge sheet alleges extraction / substitution of defaced note
packets. Where as the management expert witness say substitution of
defaced notes only ? is not there difference between loss of one number of
note & 100 number of notes ?

69. as per the normal course of duty , staff officers does not count notes in
each bundles , but they just count the number of bundles only. Is not there
chances of inserted note bundles or bundles containing less number of notes
going unnoticed ? is it not the failure of statuotary system of work
practices ?
70. does not all these prove higher authorities of RBI & CBI were hell bent to
fix mr.G.Hariram & to shield the original criminals ?
Questions with respect to other cases :
71. how do you monitor the work of bank officials nominated as directors of
companies which have availed bank loans ?

72. how do you monitor the work of companies , in which banks have
invested ?
73. how do you monitor the rapid wealth growth of certain bank officials ,
who work in shares investment / equity funds section , etc ?
74. inspite of project reports by bank officials , over assessment of
collateral securites / value of debtor companies by bank officials , the loans
become NPAs & full value cann't be realized in the market by selling off the
assets of debtor companies also. In such cases , what action is taken against
erring bank officials who collude with criminal industrialists for availing
higher amount of loan than permissible ?
75. give bankwise specific figures of NPAs.
76. give names of industrial groups / promoters whose companies have
become NPAs , so that public can be aware of them , before investing in new
companies promoted by them.
77. is not collection of loan from debtors of bank through rowdies / recovery
agents , illegal ?
78. why not criminal complaints filed against bank mangers for aiding ,
abetting rowdism , murdering people ?
79. if your method of employing rowdies to collect loans of Rs.10000 from
commoners is right , what would you do to a promoter of a debtor company
to recover loans of crores of rupees , supari killing ? but debtors of crores of
rupees is let off coolly by banks , why ?
80. what is the exact amount of loss caused to the exchequer by karim lala
telgi who printed fake stamp papers ?
81. what action has been taken against those involved ?
82. have you taken action against all those mentioned by telgi during narco
analysis test , if not why ? is it because they are powerful & bigwigs ?
83. how you are controlling the illegal finance activities , money lending by
individuals , pawn brokers & chit fund companies ?
84. how you are monitoring the receipt of public donations , foreign
donations by many NGOs ?
85. how many erring NGOs , chit fund companies , pawn brokers , individuals
you have booked for illegal finance activities ?
Questions relating to RBI CURRENCY NOTE PRESS MYSORE
86. who were responsible for selling the good printing machine at security
press nasik to scamster karim lala telgi as scrap ?

87. who recruited the candidates below merit rankings in R.B.I for what
criminal roles ?
88. how many irregularities have taken place in R.B.I till date ?
89. who is responsible for installing, operating & supervising the security
set-up in R.B.I ?
90. how the raw materials ie number of paper sheets, ink, etc are
accounted for in inward stores & while issuing for printing ?
91. how wastages, scrap of ink , papers , etc in the printing process are
accounted for?
92. How the finished goods ie currency notes are accounted for ?
93. Who keeps physical figures & possession of goods, inventory of all the
above?
94. How the scrap paper is disposed off ?
95. From security angle who keeps track from start till dispatch ?
96. Give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of stores
assistant in BRBNMPL in the year 1995-96 ?
97. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process
assistant at BRBNMPL in the year 1996 ?
98. give me the merit ranking list of all candidates for the post of process
assistants & maintenance assistants at BRBNMPL in the year 1996-1998 ?
99. is not RBI & BRBNMPL authorities created by statuotary laws , fully
funded by public money ie from government exchequer ?
100. still why BRBNMPL & RBI refused to answer my previous information
request as per RTI Act ? are you afraid that skeletons will come out of
cubboard ?

101. what action initiated against the SBI branch Bangalore & SBI Overseas
branch for loss of cheque / draft amounting to crores of rupees ? if not
why ?
102. give me specific figures bank wise with respect to loss caused to the
bank by loss of cheques or demand drafts , etc ?
103. how RBI is containing crimes of loss of cheques / DDs causing huge
losses to the banks to the tune of crores of rupees ?
YEAR TO WHICH ABOVE PERTAINS : MAJORITY OF DOCUMENTS PERTAINS TO
YEAR 1988 onwards . SOME OF THE DOCUMENTS ARE DATED BACK TO 1947.
FEES PAID : IPO NO 63E 318935 FOR RUPEES TEN ONLY Favouring CPIO RBI HQ
MUMBAI
PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER FROM WHOM THE INFORMATION IS REQUIRED :
V.S.DAS , CENTRAL PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER , O/O HONOURABLE
GOVERNOR, RBI HQ , CENTRAL OFFICE , AMAR BUILDING , P.M.MARG
,MUMBAI-400001.
Date : 01.11.2008. Yours sincerely,
Place : Mysore.. Nagaraj.M.R.

..DECLARATION

Name : ...........................NAGARAJA.M.R.
Address : ...................LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE , OPP
WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR , HEBBAL , MYSORE - 570017 INDIA
Professional / Trade Title : S.O.S - e Clarion Of Dalit
Periodicity : WEEKLY
Circulation : FOR FREE DISTRIBUTION ON WEB
Donations : NOT ACCEPTED. Self financing . Never accepted any donations , subscriptions
either for ourselves or on behalf of other organizations / individuals .
Monetary Gains : nil , never made any monetary gain by way of advertisements on my
websites or web news paper or otherwise.
Owner/Editor/Printer/Publisher : NAGARAJA.M.R.
Nationality : INDIAN
Body Donation : Physical Body of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.Se-Voice for Justice is donated to JSS Medical College , Mysore ( Donation No. 167 dated 22 /
10 / 2003 ) , In case of either Unnatural death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus
, my body must be handed over to JSS Medical College , Mysore for the study purposes
of medical students.
Eye Donation : Both EYES of Nagaraja M R , Editor , S.O.S- e clarion of Dalit & S.O.S-eVoice for Justice are donated to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore , In case of either Unnatural
death or Natural Death at the hands of criminal nexus , my eyes must be handed over
to Mysore Eye Bank , Mysore WITHIN 6 Hours for immediate eye transplantation to the
needy.Home page :
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com

UID Aadhaar No : 5703 5339 3479


Cell : 0 9341820313

I ,NAGARAJA.M.R. hereby do declare that information given above are true to the best of my
knowledge & belief. If i am repeatedly called to police station or else where for the sake of
investigations , the losses i do incurr as a result like loss of wages , transportation , job , etc
must be borne by the government. prevoiusly the police / IB personnel repeatedly called me
the complainant (sufferer of injustices) to police station for questioning , but never called
the guilty culprits , rich crooks , criminals even once to police station for questioning , as

the culprits are high & mighty . this type of one sided questioning must not be done by
police or investigating agencies . if anything untoward happens to me or to my family
members like loss of job , meeting with hit & run accidents , loss of lives , death due to
improper medical care , etc , the jurisdictional police together with above mentioned
accussed public servants will be responsible for it. Even if criminal nexus levels fake
charges , police file fake cases against me or my dependents to silence me , this complaint
is & will be effective.
If I or my family members or my dependents are denied our fundamental rights , human
rights , denied proper medical care for ourselves , If anything untoward happens to me or to
my dependents or to my family members - In such case Chief Justice of India together
with the jurisdictional revenue & police officials will be responsible for it , in such case the
government of india is liable to pay Rs. TWO crore as compensation to survivors of my
family. if my whole family is eliminated by the criminal nexus ,then that compensation
money must be donated to Indian Army Welfare Fund. Afterwards , the money must be
recovered by GOI as land arrears from the salary , pension , property , etc of guilty police
officials , Judges , public servants & Constitutional fuctionaries.
date : 21.04.2014..Your's sincerely,
place : India...Nagaraja.M.R.

edited , printed , published & owned by NAGARAJA.M.R. @ : LIG-2 / 761 , HUDCO FIRST STAGE ,
OPP WATER WORKS OFFICE , LAKSHMIKANTANAGAR ,HEBBAL ,MYSORE -570017 INDIA
cell : 91 9341820313
home page:
http://sites.google.com/site/eclarionofdalit/Home ,
http://groups.google.co.in/group/e-clarion-of-dalit ,
http://e-clarionofdalit.blogspot.com/ ,
http://in.groups.yahoo.com/group/e-clarionofdalit/ ,

http://paper.li/f-1367938674

Contact : naghrw@yahoo.com , nagarajhrw@hotmail.com ,


http://www.amnesty.org/en/user/naghrw
A Member of Amnesty International