Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
29.0 Objectives
29.1 Introduction
29.2 Meaning and Significance
29.3 Nature of Planning
29.4 Types of Planning
29.4.1 Policy and Programme planning
29.4.2 Activity Planning and Ccntral Planning
29.5 Planning Process
29.6 Planning Techniques
29.7 Location of Planning Activities
29.8 Problems of Planning
29.9, Let Us Sum Up
29.10 Key Words
29.11 Some Useful Books
29.12 Answers to Check Your Progress Exercises
29.0 OBJECTIVES
After studying this unit you should beable:
J 0
* to explain the meaning and signifi6ahce of planning in administration
* to distinguish between policy planning and programme planning and activity planning
and central planning
* to describe the process and techniques of planning; and
* to analyse the pkoblems of planning.
.29.1 INTRODUCTION
I
Administration has generally becn defined as an art and science of getting .things done. In
, the management of public affairs, 'administration' i$ conscious action to ensure that the
, policies of government are implemented faithfully in order to achieve intended results.
1
For
'
instance, if the government policy is to distribute crop loans to small and marginal farmers .
to improve their kcopomic status via better production, administrative planning would
involve a serieslof ?ctions starting from proper identification of the beneficiaries to actual
utilisation of loah funds for the intended purposes. Administrative planning would thus
embrace a number of action plans'such as target group identification, determinatibn of .
demands for quantum of loan funds, timely disbursement of loan, monitoring of utilisation'
'of funds, finding out the quantum of actcral output, and ensuring timely repayment of loan
funds. Thus, administrative planning is crucial for the achievement of results of public
sponsored programmes. In this unit, we shall study the significance, techniques and ,
. process bf administrative planning.
1
,
I
Administration involves planning, organising, leading and' evaluating people and I
programmes, so as to achieve specific goals of the government. Thus, planning is the kist , , l .
Concepts in Organisation -I1 widely quoted definitions arc discussed here;-Simon and his associates define planning as
the activity that concerns itself with proposals for the future, with the evaluation of
alternative proposals, and with the methods by which these proposals may be achieved.
Planning is rational, adaptive thought applied to the future and to matters over which the
planiiers, or the administrative organisation with which they are associated, have some
degree of control. According to Peter Drucker, "Planning is the continuous process of
making present risk taking decisions systematically and with the best possible
knowledge of their futurity, organising systemntiqally the efforts needed to carry out these
decisions, and measuring the results of these decisions against the expectations through
organized systematic feedback." Millet describes planning as the process of
determining objectives of administrative efforts and of devising the means calculated to
achieve them. Planning is a conscious activity of rationalising the decision making
processes in an organisation. It is, according to Dimock and ~ i m o c k'an
, organised attempt-
to anticipate and to make rational arrangements for dealing with future problems by
projecting trends.' Planning is indispensable to administrative process as decisions to
realise the goals limit the range of choices available to the administration owing to limited
resources.
Despite its obvious importance, administrative planning is rarely discussed and followed in
administration. We are more familiar with economic planning or financial planning, but
we know very little about the nature and methods of administrative planning. Yet every
administrator who has easned some reputation in the profession does follow some Sort of a
planned approach to his job. It is understood more as penonal skill than some kind of
transferable knowledge.
, The general tradition has been that the government departments function with very little
formal planning. There are many reasons for this state of affairs. As John Garrett: who was
a member of the consultancy group employed by the Fulton Committee in England (1968),
pointed out: "There has.been a body of opinion in the higher Civil Service, though it.is
now diminishing, that systematic research and planning has little relevance to its work.
Concentration upon the awareness of ministerial responsibility tends to put a low valuatiop
on systematic research-based planning and a high one on rapid reaction to the topic of the
day."
Predominance of politics, job security, absence of price signals or profit motive are some
of the major reasons for lack of sustained planning effort in government, Also planning ,
awareness has been low in government often because of the absence of clear objectives and
standards against which achievement could be measured with a degree of precision.
In spite of this deficiency in government operations, the need for planning has been widely
acknowledged, and various methods and techniques are now being proposed to make
planning a reality in government. The socio-economic and political environment of
government is never static, and governments everywhere are struggling hard to cope with
changes both at home and abroad. Again, resources are always scarce and they have to be
allocated among competing alternatives to maximise production and achieve all-round
social satisfaction. .
All these reasons are compelling enough to accept planning as an essential first step in
governmental operations. Planning, be it economic or financial, is forward-thinking. It I
involves a methodical mental exercise about achievement of results by means of advance
preparation of activities-scheduling. Thus, planning essentially involves 'simulation' of
activities-sequences. The real aim in planning is to achieve intended results which may be
anything like increased agricultural productivity, reducing infant mortality, removing
'
illiteracy, ctc. With more and more cost cons~iou~ness in government now and because of
increasing result-orientation in Public Administration in recent times, administrative ,
planning has assumed critical importance in govem,ment all over the globe. In a developing
country such as ours, rapid socio-economic reconstruction depends almost exclusively on
large-scale and varied public programmes and projects. In this context, administrative , I
planning has a,crucial role to play. It is now universally acknowledged that administrative ,
plahning is the key to planned deve!oprnent and achievement30fintended results. In the
,developing countries, there is urgency .about time-bound fulfilment of targets and
achievements. For instance, in India every five-year plan sets down taaets for each sector
such as agriculture, irrigation, electricity etc. In this context, administrative plannipg
becomes a critical input in target fulfilment.
. ! I
- j
Pianlling follows policy malting. Tliesr ~ w aclivities
o are distinct brad interrelated. Folicics
lay clown rhe fundamental principles of gsven.nmental action. They provide the framework
which planning has to take place. They set the terms of' reference within which
pl;ins are f'o~mulaterl.
Plarlllillg is ;t process, ~vhilea plan is 8 procluct. As a process, planning involves deciding
in advance what is ~ C he I clone and how. Decision-making ;and planning are obviously
closely related. Planning is also decision-n-laEting; yet it is rnolp than decision-making. A
piall is oriet~tedtowards the iitture arid has an action imp1ic;ation. It is projective and
inoolve:<a visio~land a pes.spective. A decision filndarnentally involve:; selection of an
alternative nrizong various choices. Colicern for the future and for n chain of activities need
not necessarily be its h;illnlnrk. /hl all the different stages of planning, decisions, however,
are of paramount importance.
Planning is of many types. Based on time it is calegorisetl as short term and long term
planning. There is ~nicloancl rliacro level ]:)lamling. 'I'he fotmer concentrates attention on a
specific area and tile Iintter refers to the entire i\rci+of the orgailisalio~~.
'There is also
physical planning which deals wiilt spatial aspects. Dirnock and Dimock identify three
types of planning: ( 1 ) nnilie,niil econornic planning (lealing with the whole of economy or a
part of It: (2) top ietel aclmii?istrutive plimning fix the government as a whole or for its
principal departriierlts or agencies: anti (3j oper;ttional planning which is primarily
concerned with carrying out tire ottjectives. As students of Public Administration we will
study different aspects of ~lministrativepl;rnnirlg, pirticulariy policy imd programme
planning and activity and central pla~lning.
4) Qistir.g~~ish
belwcen policy planning and progranlme planning.
.......................................................................................................................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................... .............................................................................
. ....................................................................................................................................................
......................................................................................................................................................
.....................................................
.......................................................................................................................................................
The incvit:tble next step is to forecttst the future and try to see tltrougli the darkness of the
coming years as clearly as possible. The time-horizon of planning may be vary.
Undersr;nnlling of the f ~ ~ t u probuhilities
re starts with an adcqu:lte knowledge of existirlg
Conce~tsin Oraanisnbiora -11 conditions. Detailed lcnowledge of the present position is helpful in making future
projections. It might be necessary to phase out an action plan and watch performance at
each specific phase.
Alternative courses of action in terms of programmes and projects are set forth at the next
stage. The planner outlines the alternative for the benefit of the decision makers who are
finally make choices out of them. This exercise is necessary from the point of view of
~nillimisationof costs and maximisation of benefits.
The next step will involve mobilisatioli of resources to back up the actual course of action.
Finance, manpower and materials have to be quantified and properly assessed at this
stage.
v) Brganisationai Planning
Another step in the planning process illvolves organisational planning including planning
of methods and procedures. The existing organisation may have to be modified marginally
or changed substantially. New procedures may have to be adopted to facilitate the pursuit
of planned action. 'The plan procedure invariably contains a built-in arrangement for
reporting and feedback in order that the results of action can be mettsured and corrective
steps taken in case of malfunctioning. Administrative planning subsumes financial
planning, personnel planning, resource planning and organisationnl planning. The whole
exercise is directed toward the n~anipulationof critical organisational resources to bring
about planned changes.
Various techniques have been evolved to facilitate governmental planning and make it
more and more precise and scientific. Planning, Programming and Budgeting System
(PPBS), Programme Evaluation Review Technique (PERT), and Critical Path Method
(CPM), Mandgement Information System, Cost Benefit Analysis, Organisational Planning
are but a few techniques very much use in government today. We shall now briefly discuss
about each of them.
The Planning-Programming-Budgeting System (PPBS) has been widely used in the U.S;
Government. It has also been put to limited use in the Governrncnt of India. This technique
grew out of Robert McNamara's quest for economic rationality in defence expenditure,
when he was the U.S. Defence Secretary. Very briefly, the steps involved in PPBS are as
I
foll0,ws:
I
1) The department's objectives have to be defined clearly and the programrnes needed to
accomplish the objectives have to be outlined.
2) The output of each programme has to be carefully calculated in relation to the
objectives.
3) Total costs of the programme have to be worked out as clearly as possible.
4) Within a long range and perspective view of the future, programme planning has to be
undertaken on multi-year basis.
5 ) 'The programme objectives have to be rigorously reviewed and their outputs and costs
examined carefully. Ultimately, one has to arrive at the most effective means of
producing a desired outpiit at the lowest cost; and
6) The last step would be to integrate PPB into the budgetary process as it rolls on from
year to years.
One of the most widely used network techniques is Programme Evaluation and Review
Technique and Critical Path Method. In PERTICPM, the activities to be accomplished in
completing a project are identified. It involves steps ranging from the start tb the
1 I
I
completion of a large project. All these steps involved are written in a diagrem. showing
1
the sequence of events in an orderly manner. The time required o! complete each activity,
required, resources, and expenditure on each activity are estimated. The network
diagram undergoes modifications, until a harmonious combination of time, resources and
costs is reached. Responsibility for completion of each activity is allotted to a position
holder in the administration. Thc network is used to monitor and review the progress of
work. Time and cost over runs are identified in advance and appropriate action is
initiated.
Administrative planning has to take care of organisational planning as well. Specific
government departn~entsare involved in he performance of allotted activities. It is
necessary to bring about a close fit between organisation and intended activities.
Administrative planning, since it charts out future courses of action, has to depend on
reliable data and information. Proper systems of data storage and 1;etrieval become relevant
in this context. What is known as Management Information System has now been accepted
as an indispensable aid to planning and decision-making. After all, administrative planning
is meant to bring about desired changes within the governnlental organisation or in some
specific sectors or aspects of society. ~ e n c eplanning
, has to rely on the techniques of
projection and forecasting.
It is difficult to control the behaviour of people to the full extent. Human beings can only
be partially controlled. A person can weaken a systcn~aticallyprepared plan. In such
circumstances, the objectives will be lost. For example, government coines with a plan to
improve the financial wition of a local body so that it is possible to implement some
welfare programmes. ~ b t a, tax consultant can help people in avoiding payment of taxes or
at least avoid paying the correct amount of taxes. A planner has to keep this problem in
mind while preparing plans. He has to see that there is large scale acceptance of the plans
by the citizens. He also has to be careful with the means by which he is going to
implement the plan. Sometimes the ends of a plan may be really genuine. But, if the
means are not up to the acceptance levels of the community, such plails are bound to fail.
Government structure
I
plans may fail if the government structure which is entrusted with the responsibility for
heir impIel.rlentationis deiiciellt. For example if the government structure is not given
nocjgh resources in terms of men and rnateri:ils to ilI'lplenle!lt a pian, it is doubtful whether
he plar! succeeds, A plan to irnprovt. literacy levels in villages will not succeed if it is not
irovided with a str1,lcture which allots resource5 and monitors the lltilisation of such
esources. Another aspect is that a politician who has a part in implementation of a plan is
oncerned about the next electior~,wllereas an adnlinistrator has a long trmz view of such a
,]an and its success. But. both are p:vt of the planning process. When the poiiticinn takes a
>
Ilort telm view and the administrator talies long term view of the same prr!blem, it faces
iificulties.
Values of people
One of the most important firctors influe~lcingimplementation of a plan is the values and
~ t l l i cof~ adminislratol-3.' h e success of a plan depends on them. If an administrator is not
having the right valucs, he may either defeat the very purpose of a plan or use the plan for
his personal ends. FOIexample, the mid-day meal scheme for school children planned by
Andhra government could not be successfiil because of lack of right values on the part of
,)eople administering the plan.
Check Yaer~rProgress 2
t ~ ~Dcr-isiorz /Vuking.
Eiardwick, C.T and Landu~rtB.F, 1970. Arirnlnistlutive S t ~ . ( z t clnd
Taraporevala Sr Sons: Bombay.
Millett, John D, 1954. M~nilgenzerrrin thp Public Seivices. M[cgraw-Hill ]Book Companjr:
New York.
Simon, Herbert A, et al, 1950. Public Administi-crtion.Alfred .4. ICncbpt: New York.