February 25, 2009

Robert M. Jones
A Professional Law Corporation
8655 Morro Road Suite C
Atascadero, CA 93422
FAX: (805) 466-7267
E mail: grigger@robertmjones.com

Dear Robert:

I have attempted for several years to contact you numerous times since receiving your
letter of September 2004. In that letter you advised that Elizabeth Meek did not wish to
communicate with me or my brother and I was to direct any questions I had for her
through you. As my phone records, e/mail history files and USPS documentations will
demonstrate, I have attempted to comply with that request without success or response
from you.

Considering the business relationship you had with my father, the respectful relationship
I had with Elizabeth and the brief talks I had with you, I am puzzled as to the reasons
why you have chosen to ignore my attempts to contact you over the past 4 years. I am
also curious as to the reason why you chose not to return calls or acknowledge
communication requests from others such as my former counselor, David Weilbacher. As
you are aware, since June of 2008, I have been representing myself and so as to present a
timely and factual case before the court, it is my understanding I have an entitlement to
certain information. In the name of time I ask again that you provide clarifications for the
flowing:

• Reasons for the change of venue from California to Hawaii

• Clarifications as to the production, signing of the 1st Amendment in Hawaii and
California

• Income tax audits and tax returns for the Trust from October 2003 to the present,
which were prepared by your accountant /business partner Michael Gould funding
of the Q-DOT, Exemption Trust and the Main Trust

• Sales of various real estate properties belonging to the Trust of which neither my
brother or I were consulted

• Transactions involving the sale of Bank Cal stocks in March of 2004 included in
the 1996 Trust which names me, Nanci Meek, as the trustee. However I was
advised by Bank officials, who provided a copy of the check indicating a
transaction of $636,000 paid to Elizabeth in April of 2004 , that Elizabeth
provided bank officials with a copy of the 1992 trust which named her as the
trustee. This would be construed as a misrepresentation of Elizabeth as the trustee
at the time of the transaction.
Once more referring to your letter of September 2004, you advised that Elizabeth did not
feel comfortable talking with me or my brother at that time but perhaps she may in the
future. I nor my brother never had a problem communicating with Elizabeth or her
daughter Lola, and it is our hope we can re-establish communications now and bring this
matter to an amicable, reasonable and fair conclusion. You can be instrumental in
bringing closure to this matter if you so chose. It is my hope you will

This letter will be provided to the Courts in person, in Hawaii on February 27 to

demonstrate good faith efforts on my part to establish communications and minimize the
Courts valuable time and the time of others involved in this case. So as not to prolong this
matter further, I respectfully ask you to respond to the requests outlined in this letter.

Very truly yours,

Nanci Meek
Beneficiary
(760) 413-5660

cc: file(s)
Bank of Hawaii
/attach.