Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
OPINION
OP S WOR L D
E XP E RT OP I NI ON
5
OPINION
Sustainable Operations:
Key challenges and way forward
T
oday, the complexity of operations for most
companies has increased to levels hitherto
unseen. Massive globalization and the need to
respond to customer expectations in varied geographies
means that companies have to cope with operational
pressures on a 24X7 basis. This complexity has got
further elevated because of turbulence in the global
economy.
More than 50 percent of executives consider
sustainabilityvery or extremely important
in a wide range of areas, including new-product
development, reputation building, and overall
corporate strategy, according to the latest McKinsey
survey. Yet companies are not taking a proactive
approach to managing sustainability: Only around 30
percent of executives say their companies actively seek
opportunities to invest in sustainability or embed it in
their business practices.
Some of the key challenges that I see for sustainability
of operations going forward are as follows.
1. High pressure on companies to manage their
operations in an energy efficient and green way has
become a huge game changer in recent times. Companies
can no longer go for low cost option of generating
wastes and disposing it. There is a need to migrate to a
regime of waste generation prevention , which requires
new capabilities in operations management
2. High Inflationary trends in the global and
domestic economies means that companies need to be
much smarter in their cost management. Volatility of
prices of key commodities like Oil, Coal, Iron Ore , Zinc,
etc coupled with currency fluctuations means that
operations have to be managed in a different way going
forward.
3. As capital expenses are being deferred because
of huge increase in the cost of capital, there is very
high pressure on existing assets to deliver operational
performance. A trade-off has emerged between
performance and health of key assets, which poses a
huge operations risk
4. Working capital management is becoming
difficult as cash to cash cycle time has increased and
availability of credit is getting erratic.
5. Loss of critical skills because of cost pressures
and competitive environment means that some key
areas in operations are being managed through day to
day firefighting, resulting in high operations risk.
6. Government policies in most developed and
developing countries have imposed very stringent
norms for Safety , Health and Environment , threatening
companies with high risk if they do not shape up
Ernst & Young research shows that high performers
are more advanced in addressing these issues related
to operations sustainability . Excellence in one or more
dimension, complemented by competence and recognition
of the connections between the others, lies at the heart
of competitive success. Such companies have been more
successful at identifying and responding to opportunities
for maximizing their potential market ,either through
entering new geographical markets or through product
innovation- creating new ones. They have
o p t i m i z e d their speed and
flexibility to respond to these
opportuni ti es.
They have been building
the right balance between
price and cost to sustain
growth. And they have been
s e c u r i n g support that they
need from their stakeholders to
enable them to execute and achieve
their goals. The pursuit of these goals
is what lies behind the great increase that
we are seeing in cross border activity,
product and process innovation,
and in rethinking m a n a g e m e n t s
approach to both attracting and
developing talent.
This means that, going forward,
companies need to manage their
operations in a significantly different
way and build new capabilities to achieve sustainable
operational performance. These capabilities need to go
beyond the conventional efforts that companies have put
in for achieving performance improvements.
Here are 6 capabilities that are required for organizations
to achieve sustainable operations
1. Ability to deliver technological innovations in process
to improve product/material / component re-usability
2. Managing obsolescence of assets and planning
replacements in time to avoid failure of operations in the
future
a. Build long term maintenance strategy
b. Robust equipment replacement /refurbishment plan
3. Developing full life cycle view of operational carbon
footprint and arrive at abatement levers
a. Evaluate energy efficient platforms , for e.g.
recovering process heat to generate steam to run a
turbine to generate power, evaluating alternate fuels, etc
b. Evaluate alternate fuels
4. Timely and effective management of capacity
a. Achieve Full Technical Specification of installed
capacity through operational effectiveness and
efficiencies
b. For incremental capacity , optimize capital
expenditure(Capex) through smart Capex management
5. Effective procurement and supply management
a. Alternate sourcing
Author
Mr. Suvradipta Banerjee ,
Associate Director , Advisory Services ,
Ernst & Young
OP S WOR L D E XP E RT OP I NI ON
6
b. Supplier development
c. Hedging against commodity and currency fluctuations
d. Smart working capital management
6. Reduce operational risk due to human factors
a. Automation
b. Fail safe design
c. IT enablement
Organisations need to pro-actively build these capabilities
through a structured approach in order to sustain their
operations on a continuous basis.
4 step approach for achieving sustainability in
operations
An integrated approach is required to achieve sustainable
operations. This approach looks at achieving operational
sustainability through 4 key initiatives
1. Set performance aspirations for future. Aim at a
horizon of 8-10 years
Cascade down to key operational capability expectations
Identify operations sustainability themes
Define organization and governance for achieving these
themes
Set sustainability performance standards and
mechanism to review and manage
Leadership to role model expected behavior and
capabilities in areas identified
Plan investments for building operational sustainability
Effective communication by leadership on sustainability
to employees and stakeholders.
2. Develop operations sustainability blueprint based on
the identified themes. The blueprint needs to clear define
the architecture for keys sustainability themes such as .
This needs adaption of new toolkits and technologies to
prepare for operational expectations in the future state.
Energy efficiency and effectiveness of operations
High reliability of operations Innovations in product
/ process /material usage to reduce wastes and increase
material re-use
Effective management of capacities both for existing
assets , brownfield and greenfield expansions
Effective use of Information Technology and
Automation.
Effective procurement and supply management
3. Develop new skills required to manage the transition
from current state to future state
New analytical tools and sustainability methodologies
Continuous training of people (cross section of
employees) as per skill gap identified to meet aspirations.
4. Effective codification and knowledge management
Standardisation of templates , tools, methodologies
Modular training content
Process Reference Guides
Interactive and efficient knowledge retrieval
Conclusion:
Organisations will face severe operations sustainability
pressures as a result of huge complexity introduced into
the global and local operating environment. The learnings
from the past few years has indicated the challenges
confronting organizations in the next 10 years.
Organisations need to focus on the following 4 key areas
in order to achieve sustainable operations .
1. Setting performance aspirations for future. Aim at a
horizon of 8-10 years
2. Developing operations sustainability blueprint based
on the identified themes
3. Developing new skills required to manage the
transition from current state to future state
4. Effective codification and knowledge management
References:
1. How companies manage sustainability: McKinsey
Global Survey results , Mckinsey Quarterly , March 2010
2. Growing beyond cost competiveness, from complexity
to confidence , Ernst & Young , October 2011
______________________________________
GUEST
ARTICLE
OP S WOR L D GUE S T ART I CL E
8
W
hen Flipkart had started out in 2007,
the e-commerce landscape in the
country was not very well-developed.
Towards the earlier half of the decade, several
online companies suffered from the lack of
proper logistics and infrastructure, and several of
those problems still remained.
The premise of Flipkart, from day one, was built
on customer delight. Our aim was to satisfy the
customer at every point of interaction with the
company. We attempted to do this through some
key services - an extensive inventory that offered
them almost every title (since we started with
books) they could think of, and a speedy and
timely delivery system.
However, the biggest
roadblocks we faced
in the early days
were in the areas
of distribution and
supply-chain. Neither
of these was well-
established in India and
in fact are still a major area of concern as far as
e-commerce is concerned.
We rapidly realized that scaling up the back-end
and making it efficient was going to be integral
to our success. Customers were becoming
much more discerning. While earlier they were
satisfied just to get the product that they had paid
for, now they expected a high quality of service
in everything from choice and discounts, to
product quality, flexible payment options, speed
of delivery and even post- delivery servicing.
Though initially we did not have much of a
budget, once we started getting funds, one of the
first things we invested in was our supply-chain
network. Needless to say, that investment paid
off.
One of our biggest investments and successes as
far as the supply-chain is concerned, is the launch
of our own delivery system in order to ease the
bottle-necks in last mile delivery. Initially we
were entirely dependent on third-party courier
services to deliver our products.
However, there were a number of problems we
Our Supply-Chain Process
faced with this system. Timely delivery was becoming an
issue. The cash-on-delivery model did not work well since
these companies were trained to deliver , and not collect
cash or engage in reverse pick-up. The only way to tackle all
these problems was to deliver our own packages.
Flipkart Logistics now operates in 27 cities and is set to
scale up in the next year. With this, our order-to-delivery
time line has reduced drastically , leading to an increase in
the number of satisfied customers.
In order to meet the increasing demand, and ensure that
our customers have access to the widest variety and best
discounts, we have always tried to maintain an extensive
distributor network, which has rapidly grown over the
years. Today we work with over 1500 suppliers across the
country and stock a large inventory of products.
Flipkart initially started off with a consignment model
where we procured books on demand and delivered it to
the customer. However, the high rate of dependency on
suppliers and the additional time taken to procure the
orders were also affecting our efficiency.
Hence we decided to invest
extensively in warehouses
as well. Larger warehouses
meant larger inventory
which in turn led to faster
order -to-delivery turnaround
time and happier customers.
Today we have warehouses in 7
cities and delivery hubs in 50 cities.
This has gone a long way in removing inventory mismatch
(where a supplier tells us that the item is in stock with
them but is unable to supply the same when the orders
come in). Almost 80% of our orders are delivered through
warehouses and our customer complaint rate is also much
lower compared to consignment orders.
We also believe in a very high-level of automation. Starting
from the website interface, to the warehouse and logistics
aspects of the business we think high-end technology is
what helps create a superior user experience.
Some of our other investments and innovations were geared
towards creating a superior user experience in other areas
of the order-to-post-delivery service chain.
Our recent 30 day replacement policy has also been an
important area of investment. Now, we replace a faulty
/ damaged product with a brand new one if we receive
a complaint within 30 days of delivery. We take care of
all reverse pick-ups and replacements with suppliers /
merchants.
One of the biggest concerns consumers have about online
shopping, is the safety of their credit card details online. For
those ready to make online purchases, frequent payment
...One of our biggest
investments and successes as far as the
supply-chain is concerned is the launch of our
own delivery system in order to ease the bottle-
necks in last mile delivery...
Author
Mr. Sachin Bansal
Co-founder and CEO, Flipkart.com
OP S WOR L D GUE S T ART I CL E
9
gateway failures are another barrier.
We decided to address all these problems by
introducing our cash-on-delivery model. We started
with a small pilot in Bangalore and once that took
off, we took the service to a number of other cities. In
certain areas, we have even started a card-on-delivery
service. With this, the consumer does not need to
worry about having adequate cash or change with
them they can swipe their cards then and there, and
pay for their purchases.
We have also launched a wallet system a few days ago.
The Flipkart.com wallet has been launched keeping
in mind the ease and convenience of our heavy users
- those who shop with us multiple times during the
month, and particularly when individual transactions
have small ticket-size (i.e., micro payments).
Wallet offers our customers the convenience of
making payment once and shopping multiple times
with us. This also ensures that customers do not have
to go through the bank verification processes every
time they buy something on Flipkart.com. The wallet
cuts down on payment gateway issues as well.
Our aim is to reduce the time spent on the order
process as much as possible thus making online
shopping a simpler, faster and completely hassle-free
experience for our customers.
As far as future is concerned, we will be looking at
bigger investments in our supply chain and technology.
This should result in a more extensive network
of warehouses and increased automation of our
processes. We believe a higher level of independence
will improve our services further leading to greater
sales and a greater customer conversion.
Today, with our customer base growing by 30%
month on month, the importance of a robust and
extensive supply-chain network, better logistics etc.
have become even more paramount.
What other companies and entrepreneurs looking
to enter this space should remember is that the
challenges posed by the market in India are unique
- from supply-chain and logistics to warehousing and
payments. Any company which is starting operations
in this country will have to invest time and resources
to overcome similar problems.
It is important for large players to build their own
infrastructure if they want to succeed in this space.
_________________________________________
Across Clues
2. This is something customers will buy at a price they are
willing to pay.
3. Should indicate how the operations objectives will be
achieved.
6. This strategy defines what business the company is pur-
suing
8. This is what customer attributes represents of the cus-
tomer
9. This strategy indicates that the product should have a
technical advantage.
10. What competence must have a market and customer?
Down Clues
1. This is one of the common objectives of operations.
3. Concerned with designing the physical new product (2
words).
4. is one of the elements of operations strategy model.
5. Is responsible for supplying the product or service of the
company.
7. Is responsible for ordering and receipt of goods.
(Answers on Page no. 21)
CROSSWORD
SUSTAINABILITY
FACULTY OPINION
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
11
Jack of All Trades, Master of Two
Abstract
Companies attempting the
ultimate state of excellence do
fnd very less scope of further
improvement at the peak of the
pyramid. In fact, improvement
at this stage is very difcult
as the organizations have
tried every possible way to
improve. While most of the
organizations are adopting
developed technology and
advanced managerial skill at
individual department level,
they wittingly or unwittingly
ignore the impact of
interfaces and co-ordination
between these disciplines.
Tis missing link of proper
co-ordination between
various disciplines,eventually
carves the scope of further
improvements.
Tis task is not easy, as
the managers involved in
making the decisions need
to understand the pros,
cons and business tricks of
various departments. For
an individual to acquire
such knowledge and enable
implementation across
disciplines is very demanding
and challenging.
Tis article attempts to
provide a way out. Te
seemingly complex problem
can be simplifed with
involvement of a chain
(group) of managers: each
expert in at least two domains.
Tis suggests managers have
basic knowledge of all the
organizational functions and
possess expertise in at least
two streams. Here we discuss
some of the problems and
their possible solutions as a
result of an interface of other
streams with Operations
management.
W
ith globalization and
increased competition,
companies need to carve
new avenues and opportunities for
business growth. This is not sufficient
as the
c o mp a n i e s
have to ensure
s us t e na nc e
of existing
b u s i n e s s ,
along with its
growth. It has
been observed
that over a
period of time,
the companies
develop a unique feature or culture
which becomes an order winning
strategy for sustenance and growth.
For instance, Toyota production
system is a well known approach
adopted by Toyotas, implementation
of Six Sigma has made GE popular.
In India, TVS group is known for its
initiative in Total Quality Management.
One can cite many such examples of
companies that have exploited the
market opportunities and earned a
leading position.
Many a times, innovative
strategies are essential to maintain the
earned position. Leveraging domain
specific strength will certainly give a
competitive advantage. It will be more
beneficial if the companies develop
inter-functional competencies, and
understand the business tricks across
various disciplines.
The development of inter-functional
competencies posses many challenges
as it require various skill sets,
sometimes contradicting, and at times
complementing each other. However,
the complex challenge can be simplified
by developing a chain (group) of
expertise; each individual, expert in
two areas. In this article we discuss
some common issues that can be
handled in a better way if one possess
expertise in two domain areas; one out
of two being operations management.
In the following sections we explore through
some challenges and/or opportunities across
various disciplines.
Operations and Marketing Interface
Advertising has a very special place among
the many different facets of marketing
management. In fact, many people still believe
that marketing is just a synonym for advertising.
A manager in advertising has to take very
important decisions on a daily basis. Some of
these are which advertisement
should be used now?, what
should be the frequency
of appearance of
the advertisement?,
what is the best mode
for advertising?, what
should be highlighted
in the advertisement?
etc. Though at first
glance, these questions
do not seem to do much
with operations, however,
the decisions will be easy if the manager takes
into account the status of the inventories of the
various products. The decision will be more
appropriate if the manager is also aware of or
understands, the details of the supply chain
network and the basic processes involved in
the manufacturing of the products. This will
certainly give a complete picture regarding what
to emphasize upon, and the appropriate time to
advertise.
Retail is also considered to be one of the most
important aspects of marketing management.
The goods in retail are meant to be sold in
small lots, and are also meant for direct use or
consumption. Retailers purchase goods from
manufacturers, importers or wholesalers in bulk
quantities, and then sell them to the end-users,
which may be individuals or businesses. Retail
distribution governs the last mile connectivity
of the supply chain, and hence is a vital part
of the distribution channel for the marketers.
Retail sector has grown at an astonishing rate
in the recent years; the skill sets essential for
supply chain will be handy in managing the
retail chains. Understanding demand is also
an essential in retail. Forecasting methods
like moving average, regression analysis, Holt-
Winter approach, Box Jenkins technique will
be of use here. Some other techniques that will
enable retail management in a better way are
the queuing theory and layout planning.Another
major aspect of marketing that we can focus
upon (in the context of this article) is sales.
Author
Prof. Omkarprasad S Vaidya
Operations Management and Quantitative Techniques Group,
Indian Institute of Management Raipur
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
12
Though sales can be simply defined as selling of a product
or service, the people working in this department should
understand the supply chain network of the organization,
and the basics of supply chain for having a better
insight into the delivery conditions and the lead time
required for any given order. Supply chain network is the
collection of physical locations, transportation vehicles
and supporting systems through which the products
and services are managed and ultimately delivered. The
physical locations can be manufacturing plants, storage
warehouses, distribution centers, ports, suppliers,
transport carriers, third-party logistics provider and
retail store.
Operations and Finance Interface
Activity based costing (ABC) is one of the most popular
tools to measure and improve upon the cost associated
with a manufacturing, business or administration process,
or any service. It is basically finance and accounting
concepts used predominantly for supporting strategic
decisions such as pricing, outsourcing, identification
and measurement of process improvement initiatives.
ABC determines all the resources and processes that act
as the inputs to create a particular product or service.
Then, it evaluates the costs associated with each of them,
including the time taken. Thus it is able to zero-in on the
cost drivers for each resource and evaluate the overall
coat of the product or service. Briefly ABC helps in make
the following decisions:
Identify, and if
required, eliminate the
unprofitable products,
processes and services,
and reduce the costs
of those which are
overpriced.
Identify, and if required, eliminate the products
and processes which pay little role in the final output, or
have better alternatives for.
Though ABC is a tool mainly associated with finance and
accounting stream of management, to use it effectively,
one must also understand the aspects of operations
management involved in it. ABC segregates the overall
costs into fixed costs, variable costs and overhead
costs. This split helps in identifying the cost drivers. But
then, one needs a good knowledge base in operations
management to do such classifications effectively.
The optimization skills that very commonly used
in making decisions in operations can be of vital
importance in many finance related areas. Most of these
tools are statistical or probabilistic in nature. They
are used extensively in portfolio selection, derivatives
management, risk management, financial products
valuation and pricing policies. The optimization tools
and models have been used in manufacturing since a very
long time and thus were developed, initially, specifically
for them. Another application of forecasting techniques
is predicting the share prices in stock market.
Operations and HRM Interface
Operations management and Human Resources
Management (HRM) have always been considered as very
distinct fields. They have been developed separately with
little or no interaction except administrative issues. A
closer look however suggests something else. Researchers
(Boudreau et.al, 2002) claim that these two disciplines
are intimately related at a fundamental level. Many
effects of human resource activities like pay, training,
communications, and staffing can be better explained or
moderated by using operations tools One can also note
various real-life events to illustrate how the application
of the two concepts together have been quite successful
at resolving issues which could not be tackled using one
of them alone. Briefly, models in operations management
area could provide insight into the search for pivot points
that may be affected by talent. HRM could offer insights
about factors that affect development of the appropriate
talent and the extent to which satisfaction among workers
affects retention and performance. But by truly bringing
the two perspectives together, we can design hybrid
systems that combine the motivational benefits of team-
build with the efficiency of progressive-build. Thus it can
be safely concluded that operations and HR managers, if
work in synchronization, can accomplish a lot and resolve
many serious problems. On the other hand, if a human
resources manager has a sound knowledge of operations
management, he/she alone can make real differences in a
similar fashion.
Operations and IT Interface
Operations management
has been around for a
long time now, at least
much before anyone even
anticipated anything even close
to Information Technology (IT). Today, IT has become very
prominent in not only the industry and economy, but even the
life of almost anybody. Moreover, IT has found applications
in every length and breadth of the industry, be it any of the
management streams or any feld of business. One very
simple example could be the popular sofware used in almost
every organization for manufacturing resource planning and
enterprise resource planning. Tese systems come in handy
especially in case a large number of parts are involved in
material resource planning.
On the other hand, though not as evident as the previous case,
operations management has a lot of potential application(s) in
IT. One of the very obvious ones is the application of process
improvement methodologies like the Teory of Constraints
(TOC). TOC is a very versatile tool and is used in many
distinct felds with the same purpose- to make the process
or system more goal (or proft) oriented by identifying
and eliminating constraints in a systematic manner. For
instance, Coman and Ronen (1995) explain and illustrate
using a case study how the principles of TOC can be applied
in IT. This work states some breakthrough statistics like
around 15% of all projects in IT industry never deliver
anything and overruns of 100-200% are very common.
...though ABC is a tool mainly associated with
finance and accounting stream of management, to use
it effectively, one must also understand the aspects of
operations management involved in it...
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
13
This analysis appears to be based on the gap between
the optimal and existing situations. These figures can
be improved upon, to a large extent by using TOC. The
publication concludes that coupled with some other
tools, TOC can be mobilized to examine potential future
constraints, and not only the present constraints. It
also suggests exploitation of competitors constraints
to establish barriers for entry in the market, and offers
a hierarchy of constraints across various levels of the
organization.
Thus operations management and IT have a lot to do
with each other, and a manager in IT having a sound
background of operations certainly will have an edge
over his/her peers devoid of this knowledge.
Operations and Economics Interface
Economics is somewhat more related to operations.
One of the well-known phenomena that display this
link is the Bullwhip Effect. Briefly stating, it refers to the
amplification in the variations in stocks as one moves up
in the supply chain or away from the consumers. Though
the main reasons behind Bullwhip Effect are behavioral
(eg. panic ordering reactions after unmet demand) or
operational (eg. forecast errors, lead time variability,
etc.) in nature, its effects
are easily observed
as variations and
fluctuations in supply
and demand curves-
a feature largely
attributed to economics.
Besides, several research
publications have concluded that operations and
economics have a lot to do with each other. Powell and
Schmenner (2002) present a detailed analysis of the
complex link between throughput time, price, and profit
maximization. From this analysis, economists can gain
a working example of how to open the black box of
production in terms of theoretical analysis and better
specify labors role in the production process.
Conclusions
In this article, an attempt is made to explain that no field
in management is isolated from the others. Emphasis is
given to explain briefly the interface of operations and
other major disciplines: marketing, finance, HR, IT and
economics. A careful and detailed study will enable the
managers carve scope for further improvements and
attain the desired goal.
It is also essential that leading B Schools take an initiative
and guide the students (tomorrows mangers) towards
developing and understanding the skills across various
disciplines, rather than providing focused guidance in one
specialized area. It is hoped that the student community
will get a brief idea of the cross disciplinary opportunities,
and help in choosing an appropriate career. The executive
officers on the other hand can introspect their strengths
and weakness, and work accordingly. With a chain
(group) of connoisseurs, having basic knowledge of all
disciplines (Jack of all trades) and an expertise in various
interdisciplinary areas (master of two), the companies
will certainly achieve better heights.
Acknowledgement: The author acknowledges the
help and support from Mr. Akshay Agarwal and Mr.
Rohit Bhagat, students at IIM Raipur.
Further reading (Print):
Boudreau, J., Hopp, W., McClain, J. O. & Thomas, L.
J. (2002), On the interface between operations and
human resources management (CAHRS Working
Paper #02-22). Ithaca, NY: Cornell University, School
of Industrial and Labor Relations, Center for Advanced
Human Resource Studies. http://digitalcommons.ilr.
cornell.edu/cahrswp/63
Coman A. and Ronen B., (1995), Information
Technology in Operations Management: a Theory-
of-Constraints Approach, International Journal of
Production Research, 33 (5), 1403- 1415
Philip T. Powell and Roger W. Schmenner, (2002),
Economics and Operations Management: Towards a
Theory of Endogenous Production Speed, Managerial
and Decision Economics, 23(6), 331342
Rajiv D. Banker, Inder S. Khosla (1995), Economics
of operations management: A research perspective,
Journal of Operations Management, 12, 423-435
Tang, Christopher
S., A Review of
Marketing-Operations
Interface Models:
From Co-Existence
to Coordination and
Collaboration (October
26, 2009). Available at SSRN:
http://ssrn.com/abstract=1568947
Vandaele, N. and Perdu, L. (2010), The operations-
finance interface: An example from lot sizing,
Proceeding of 7th International Conference on
Service Systems and Service Management, Japan, 1-6
Further reading (Internet) as accessed on 30 October
2011:
h t t p : / / www. q f i n a n c e . c o m/ c a s h - f l o w-
management-calculations/activity-based-costing
http://www.artelys.com/gb/services/finance.html
http://faculty.haas.berkeley.edu/hoteck/PAPERS/
Special%20Issue.pdf
http://www.boozallen.com/media/file/110165.
pdf
____________________________________
...it is also essential that leading B Schools
take an initiative and guide the students (tomorrows
mangers) towards developing and understanding the
skills across various disciplines rather than providing
focused guidance in one specialized area...
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
14
Cold Chain Management:
A Conceptual Design for
Sustainable Performance Improvement
Abstract
Te supply chain of perishables, of-
ten referred to as a Cold Chain, can
be considered to be a series of equip-
ments and processes used to protect
perishables, starting from source until
consumption. As all perishables fall in
fragile category and have limited lives,
their handling is far more complex and
prone to much higher risks compared
to handling of non-perishable prod-
ucts. And, with perishable food prod-
ucts forming one of the fastest grow-
ing items of Indian grocery sector, cold
chain management is assuming greater
importance and drawing the atten-
tion of practitioners and researchers.
Tis study is an attempt to identify
the driving Performance Attributes
and Decision Factors to evaluate cold
chain performance and then imple-
ment continuous improvement that
could help an organization to sustain
in todays fast changing milieu. Man-
agers can identify better processes and
can benchmark them for improving
the identifed weaknesses. Tey can
further analyze the efectiveness of the
potential improvement opportunities
as per the current operational condi-
tions and strategies of their company.
Prelude
G
iven that most food,
pharmaceutical, and
chemical products get
degraded by inappropriate
exposure to temperature,
humidity, light and certain
contaminants (Smith, 2005);
a consistent management of
controlled environment all
along the supply chain is a key
in maintaining the quality of
perishable products till the final
delivery point. A Cold Chain is a
physical process that dominates
the supply chain of perishable
products. It includes a series of
equipment and processes used to
protect the perishables, by keeping
them chilled and frozen, starting
from the source of origin to the
destination of consumption (Salin
and Nayga, 2003). The perishable
products can be categorized into
two types viz., living products and
non-living products. The living
Products include fruits, vegetables,
live seafood, flowers etc., where
respiration is an on-going process,
which uses up stored energy or
food reserves by emitting heat and
water vapors. Here, temperature
is an imperative constraint,
and the impact of non-optimal
temperatures results in the loss
of quality in form of earlier ageing
and natural senescence. Too high
temperature results in loss of
quality, rapid deterioration and
microbial spoilage whereas, too
low temperature causes remove,
chilling injury, freezing destructions and
death (Ames, 2006). The non-living products
include meat, dairy products, processed food
products, medicines, blood, frozen products,
etc. Similarly, if these products were not kept
in a controlled or an optimum temperature, a
microbial spoilage loss of quality in the form
of flavor and texture degradation would be
perceptible (Sowinski, 1999).
The cold chain starts at farm level (harvest
methods, pre-cooling) and continues during
first handling, processing, distribution
and finally covers up to the consumer level
(cooling practices and behavior) as shown
in Figure 1. It is the continuous degradation
in quality and value of the product from
source to destination, which differentiates
the cold chain from the supply chain of non-
perishable items.
Management of a controlled environment
during the cold chain is a key to keep
perishable products at the required level
of quality and quantity at the final delivery.
Bogataj et al. (2005) have stated the formal
definition of global Cold Chain Management
(CCM) as, the process of planning,
implementing and controlling efficient,
effective flow and storage of perishable
goods, related services and information from
one or more points of origin to the points of
production, distribution and consumptions
in order to meet customer requirements.
A temperature disturbance occurs when
perishables are allowed to warm up or when
the surrounding temperature fluctuates.
Author
Dr. Rohit Joshi
Assistant Professor, IIM Shillong
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
15
To maintain the temperature in the entire route from
producers/manufacturers to consumer end, specialized
facilities and technologies are essential to constitute a
robust cold chain. The major issues involved with the
implementation of a cost-effective and efficient CCM are:
(i) pre-cooling facilities at farm, (ii) awareness among
farmers regarding cold chain practices (iii) cold storages
facilities (iv) refrigerated logistics, (v) packaging, (vi)
product tracking and tracing, (vii) information technology
enabled network (viii) inventory control, (ix) dynamic
pricing (x) quality and safety throughout the chain, (xi)
retailers practices, (xii) consumers knowledge and
awareness, (xiii) government support, (xiv) laws and
regulations, (xv) cold chain performance measurement
etc.
In this study, the concentration is on performance
management of cold chain that includes all the links
from a farmer to a consumer. Here, an attempt has been
made to identify the Performance Attributes and Decision
Factors that assists in evaluating cold chain performance,
and then to implement the continuous improvement and
to develop a novel Consistent Measurement Scale (CMS).
The identification of Performance Attributes and Decision
Factors, and the development of CMS are based on actual
scenarios of the cold chain in Indian market.
Cold Chain Performance Management
In todays competitive milieu, the quality of perishable
products could be one of the main drivers for retailers
to attract additional customers and thus increase
profitability. Thron et al.
(2007) stated that the
quality of perishable
goods assortment
is becoming the core
reason many customers choose one retailer over another.
The global market for perishable goods such as cooled
products and processed foods is growing due to changing
lifestyles and overall declining prices. Any variation in
time/distance or temperature in the cold chain could
hamper the net present value of the activities, and thus
adversely affect the overall performance (Bogataj et al.,
2005).
The cold chain management is not easy even when
operating in a developed economy such as the US and UK.
It gets even more challenging in developing economy like
India. In most developed economies, with affirm support
from robust infrastructure, there are limited uncertainties
in business process related to logistics. However, in
developing economies logistics tends to poses several
types of challenges due to unpredictable environment,
weaker infrastructure and uncertainty in availability of
basic necessities like water, power etc (Joshi et al. 2009).
For example, in India it is estimated that around 35% to
40% of the total production of fresh fruits and vegetables,
is wasted only because of inadequate and inefficient cold
storage, poor logistics and lack of other infrastructure
supports (Viswanadham, 2006). At the current level
of production, which makes India the second largest
producer of fruits and vegetables in the world, the wastage
of farm produce is valued at Rs. 70,000 million ($1400m),
which is almost equivalent to the total production of Great
Britain (Khan, 2005). At a time when cold chain is a key
domain for the food sector, an effective development of
the cold chain is becoming an important issue. The high
margin of product losses offers a significant opportunity
for improvements, and advocates for technology and
research advancement within this domain.
In the business of perishable products, there is a
direct correlation between the cold chain performance
(CCP) and the quality of the end deliverable. For a
considerable period of time, the cold chain data has
been underutilized and used solely for the purposes
of evaluating the integrity of individual shipments, i.e.
facilitating the accept or reject decisions. This data could
be gathered to measure performance of the cold chain,
which in turn could identify flaws and weaknesses in the
processes for eliminating problems before they occur. A
well defined performance measurement system (PMS)
aims at supporting the setting of objectives, evaluating
performance and determining future courses of action on
a strategic, tactical and operational level (Gunasekaran
et al. 2001). PMS allows comparison of planned and
actual parameter values, and taking certain reactive
measures in order to improve performance or re-align
the monitored value to the defined value (Beamon,
1999). However, measuring the performance of a cold
chain is difficult as it has certain characteristics that set
it apart from other types of supply chains, namely:
shelf life constraints,
seasonality in production,
physical product features like appearance, taste, odour,
colour, size and image,
long production
throughput time,
refrigerated transportation and storage requirement,
traceability,
product quality and safety. (Aramyan et al., 2007;
Mangina and Vlachos, 2005)
The framework for consistent measurement scale (CMS)
of cold chain attributes
There are a number of attributes of a cold chain PMS.
In this study, these attributes have been identified based
on an exhaustive literature review and discussions
with academics and industry practitioners. In the
initial phase, a visit to the selected organizations was
undertaken to understand their use of cold chain
operations. Literature related to cold chain performance
was then circulated among the experts. Within a period
of fifteen days, a brainstorming session was organized
to identify the performance attributes. In all, thirty-
six attributes were identified during this session.
Based on a continued analysis, the number was then
systematically reduced to twenty-seven, as some were
overlapped and some were combined. These attributes
were further grouped into seven major categories and a
cause-and-effect diagram was created (Figure 2). Once
the attributes were finalized, a consistent measurement
scale (CMS) was developed to rate different attributes
on a consistent scale for evaluating performance more
consistently. Thus evaluators can judge the performance
of the attributes in a better way, as data collection is
relatively easy and accessible due to this quantification.
...the quality of perishable products could be
one of the main drivers for retailers to attract additional
customers and thus increase profitability....
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
16
Based on the CMS, managers could quantify the
performance of each cold chain attribute, as well as the
overall cold chain performance of the company. Further
they can compare and evaluate these values against the
competitors to examine their companys competitive
gains and losses, and to understand the weaknesses in
their cold chain processes. Managers could then identify
better processes which could be benchmarked for
improving the known weaknesses. After short listing the
potential improvement alternatives, the next step would
be to assess if those are suitable for implementation as
per the operational conditions of the company. After
discussions with experts, the consensus was arrived upon
to conclude with eight decision factors, based on which
the efficiency and effectiveness of potential alternatives
could be judged. These decision factors are discussed
later in detail.
Before something can be measured, it must be defined. The
definitions of the attributes and how an attribute affects
a company are explained in Table 1. This understanding
could be significant for obtaining relevant information
during evaluation, and for evaluating the relationship
between attributes. Different levels of ratings are
established depending on the type of sub-attributes.
In order to evaluate performance more consistently,
consistent measurement scale (CMS) for each sub-attribute
are shown on Table 2 (last column).
Table 1: Defnition of Attributes and Sub attributes for performance evaluation
Attributes &
defnition
Attributes afect on a
company
Sub attributes Defnition of Sub-attributes
Cost: Running
expenditure on
whole cold chain
operations of an
organization.
Microbial spoilage
in the food industry
represents a huge cost
and waste of a valu-
able resource. Lower
product losses, energy
costs, cost of opera-
tion and maintenance
of refrigeration
system and lost time
costs can enhance the
competitiveness.
Operation Cost Includes costs of refrigeration including internal or
external service, maintenance costs, lost time costs,
salary of dedicated employee and energy costs
Inventory Cost Includes storage cost and carrying cost
Distribution cost Cost associated with delivery activities like refriger-
ated transportation and handling
Cost of Expired/
wasted product
Includes cost of product losses, which perish due to
overage or mishandling
Cost of staf training Amount spent on training of staf for attaining
required skills and knowledge
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
17
Attributes & defnition Attributes afect on a company Sub attributes Defnition of Sub-attributes
Quality & Safety: Te degree of customer
satisfaction with a product's characteristics
(safety and hygiene) and features (freshness
and juiciness) are the measure of quality.
Consumers are increasingly con-
cerned with food quality and safety,
and give freshness very high priority
while purchasing chilled and frozen
foods.
Certifcation Includes costs of refrigeration includ-
ing internal or external service, main-
tenance costs, lost time costs, salary of
dedicated employee and energy costs
Customer satisfaction for
Q&S
Includes storage cost and carrying cost
Categorization as per
remaining shelf life
Cost associated with delivery activities
like refrigerated transportation and
handling
Traceability: Te ability to trace product
information regarding transaction (order,
shipment, payment), location (ware-
house, trafc, inventory), condition
(temperature, humidity) and time (self life)
through all stages of production, processing
and distribution.
Product temperature may vary in
each step, especially when loading
and unloading is performed outside
controlled temperature conditions
and so traceability is today a key
concept. Traceability can help in
identifying faws and weaknesses
in the processes and eliminating
problems before they occur.
At farmers place No. of points of monitoring (condi-
tion) at farmers level
During transit No. of points of monitoring (condi-
tion) during transit
At retail store No. of points of monitoring (condi-
tion) at retail store
Te degree of details of
information about items
monitored
No. of information secured about the
product while monitoring
Te degree of automation Te degree of automation (Manual,
semi automatic, automatic) of item
identifcation and data collection
process.
Service level: An ability of organization to
supply their customers wants and needs.
A good service always delights
customer. For a cold chain it can be
viewed as a feature distinguished
from other competitors and can in-
crease sales and image e.g. refriger-
ated home delivery, operating hours
and convenience etc.
No. of Billing stations Number of billing counters /square
meter
Convenience Ease of reach by customers
Operating hour No. of hours for which store is open for
customer
Payment method No. of modes of payments
Delivery coverage Refrigerated home delivery area
covered
Product availability Presence of large assortment and no
stock out
Return on assets (ROA): Ability of organiza-
tion to generate production and make proft
utilizing its existing assets.
Efciency in utilizing refrigeration
assets can enhance productivity at
a low cost without hampering the
quality.
product of operation
margin
Net proft to sales
Total asset utilization Sales/ Total assets
Innovativeness: Any creative idea, getting
implemented or realized successfully as an
individual or a part of the existing operation
with the purpose of improving the current
performance level.
Innovativeness is the only answer
to continuously changing customer
requirement and highly intense
competition.
New launch of technology Percentage of reduction in time or cost
by new technology to earlier ones.
New launch of service Percentage of increase in sale by new
service / total sale
New marketing event Percentage of increase in sale by new
event / total sale
Relationship: A logical association between
customer, employees and partners.
A satisfaction level of customer,
employees and farmers has direct
impact on organisations perfor-
mance.
Customer Average satisfaction of selected
customer
Farmer (training, interac-
tions)
Average satisfaction of selected farmer/
supplier
Employee (training for
req. knowledge)
A measure of job satisfaction of an
employee
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
18
Attributes Sub-attributes Rating Evaluation Standard
Cost Operation Cost VH
[a]
(Corresponding cost/ total cost) x 100 >50%
Inventory Cost H 35%-50%
Distribution cost A 20%-34%
Cost of Expired/ wasted
product
L 10%-19%
Cost of staff training VL <10%
Quality & Safety Certification VH No. of certifications (HACCP, GMP,
GAP, GLP, ISO 2000, ISO14000 etc.) a
company have
>3
H 3
A 2
L 1
VL 0
Customer Satisfaction for
Q&S
VH How likely is that you will recommend
(company X) to a friend or colleague?
(0 to 10 scale). Random customers are
asked and the average score is
calculated.
9-10
H 7-8
A 4-5
L 2-3
VL 0-1
Categorisation as per
remaining shelf life
VH Sorting on information on the
remaining shelf life of entity updated in
the function of temperature condition
experienced in cold chain
Automatic
H Semi-automatic
A Manual
L Occasional
VL Never
Traceability At farmers place VH No. of points a product is traces with
RFID/ barcode/ smart tags and Trucks
with temperature indicators/ GPS etc.
>10
During transit H 7-9
At retail store A 5-6
L 2-4
VL 0-2
The degree of details of
information about items
monitored
VH No. of information (time, temperature,
humidity, expected shelf life, price,
colour, weight, volume, sell by date
etc.) secured about the product while
monitoring.
>10
H 7-9
A 5-6
L 2-4
VL 0-2
Degree of automation VH The degree of automation (Manual,
semi-automatic, automatic) of item
identification and data collection
process.
Automatic
H In between
A Semi-automatic
L In between
VL Manual
Service level No. of billing stations VH No. of counters/ 1000m
2
>4
H 4
A 3
L 2
VL <1
Convenience
VH No. of store in a city >10/ city
H 8-10/ city
A 5-7/ city
L 3-4/ city
VL 1-2/ city
Operating hour VH Operating time for store 16-24hr
H 9-16
A 7-9
L 6-7
VL
<6
Attributes Sub-attributes Rating Evaluation Standard
Payment method VH No. of methods ( Credit card, Debit > 4
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
19
Attributes Sub-attributes Rating Evaluation Standard
Payment method VH No. of methods ( Credit card, Debit
card, Cash, membership card, on-line
payment, phone payment , other
payment gateways)
> 4
H 4
A 3
L 2
VL 1
Delivery coverage VH Refrigerated home delivery area
covered
> area of the city
H area of the city
A area of the city
L area of the city
VL < area of the city
Product availability VH Average no. of items out of stock <3
H 3
A 4
L 5
VL >5
Return on assets
(ROA)
Net profit to sales VH (Net profit/ total sales) x 100 >80%
H 60-80%
A 40-60%
L 20-40%
VL <20%
Total asset utilization VH Total sales/ total asset owned >80%
H 60-80%
A 40-60%
L 20-40%
VL <20%
Innovativeness New launch of technology
New launch of service
New marketing event
VH Reduction in time (or cost)/ total time
(cost) x100
(Sales after new service or event/ total
sales) x 100
>80%
H 60-80%
A 40-60%
L 20-40%
VL <20%
Relation Customer
Farmer
Employee
VH Average satisfaction of selected
customer/ farmer/ employee (0-10
scale)
8-10
H 6-8
A 4-6
L 2-4
VL 0-2
[a]
VH: Very High, H: High, A: Average, L:Low, VL: Very Low
The aim of the second stage of the framework is to provide guidelines for attaining continuous improvement, by
the selection of more efficient processes learned from the competitors. These processes could be considered as
potential alternatives to improve the cold chain performance of the company. There could be various alternatives
for an improvement, which can be compared to a set of decision factors (or companys strategy). As discussed
earlier in this section, eight decision factors are finalized on which the potential alternatives would be judged. The
definitions of decision factors are explained in Table 3. The rating and evaluation standard of decision factors are
given in the last column of Table 3, to enable consistency during the entire selection process.
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
20
Table 3: Consistent measurement scale of companies decision factors for improvements assessment
Decision Factors & Definition Rating Evaluation Standard
Effectiveness: Improvement from an alternative
is a prime concern. Degree of effectiveness
divulges how much the alternative can help and
its suitability to improve the current situation.
VH Forecasted degree of change
in the corresponding sub-
criteria
>90%
H 60-90%
A 30-60%
L 0-30%
VL <0%
Payback period: Payback period is the simplest
method of looking at any proposed
improvement. It refers to the period of time
required for the return on an investment to
"repay" the sum of the original investment on the
improvement alternative.
VH Forecasted time period
between the installation of
alternative and improvement
begin
<2 days
H 2-7 days
A 1-3 weeks
L 2-3 weeks
VL >3 week
Added cost: The extra costs associated with
improvement alternative must be considered for
improving the existing situation and for the
future strategy and development. It includes
expenses during the set-up and operation cost of
the alternative.
VH Forecasted (Added cost in
set up, running and
maintenance/ total cost) x
100
>50%
H 40-50%
A 30-40%
L 10-20%
VL <10%
Added time: Time is an important criterion as
more cost is involved if more time is spent on
alternative improvement. This includes the extra
amount of time spent for investigating the
suitability, setting-up and operating the
corresponding alternative.
VH Forecasted research and set-
up time
>8 weeks
H 5-8 weeks
A 3-5 weeks
L 1-3 weeks
VL < 1 week
Capability: It is defined as the ability of a
company to manage and monitor the alternative
so as to achieve the improvement. It is vital, as it
may be possible that the alternative itself is very
effective, but the company does not have any
knowledge and technique to operate the
alternative.
VH Forecasted percentage of
delay or error caused
0-3%
H 3-5%
A 5-15%
L 15-30%
VL >30%
Adhesion with Existing system: A complete
adhesion of the improvement with the existing
system is must for better overall performance of
the system. This can be measured in terms of
time required to integrate the alternative with the
existing system completel y, without causing any
disturbance of performance.
VH Forecasted time required by
alternative to adhere with
existing system
< 1day
H 1-3 days
A 3-7 days
L 1-2 weeks
VL > 2 weeks
Top management: This refers to the degree of
willingness of management to accept the
alternative with the belief of improvement and
further participation by the highest-level
executives, which results in more efficient and
effective preparation and implementation.
VH Degree of willingness from
top management to accept
the alternative (0-10 scale)
8-10
H 6-7
A 4-5
L 3-4
VL 0-2
Constraints: A constraint is a condition that a
solution or answer must satisfy. The number and
variety of limitation and restriction existed in
selecting any particular alternative is considered
as a constraint. Constraint is treated as unwanted
factor to lower the choice of selecting
alternative.
VH Internal and external
constraints
>8 constraints
H 8-6 constraints
A 5-4 constraints
L 3-2 constraints
VL 0-1 constraint
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
21
Once the CMS has developed, a consistent measuring scale
and benchmarking methodology may be implemented
by a cold chain performance manager (evaluator) for
understanding the present strengths and weaknesses
of their companies vis-a-vis their competitors. They can
identify better processes from their competitors, and
benchmark them for improving the weaknesses. Managers
can further analyze the effectiveness of the potential
improvement opportunities, as per current operational
conditions and strategies of the company. This framework
also facilitates the decision makers to understand the
complex relationships of the relevant attributes in the
decision-making, which may consequently improve the
accuracy of the decision. Different companies can choose
their own attributes
and sub-attributes
with different values of
relative influences, to
best suit their own goals and business strategies.
Conclusion
Maintaining a cold chain is a far complicated process than
it is perceived to be. This study has attempted to present
a performance improvement system that tries to address
the complexities of cold chain evaluation with a focus on
the practicing managers efforts towards improvement.
The cold chain managers (evaluators) can judge the
performance of the cold chain in a more effective way, as
data collection is relatively easy and accessible due to the
consistent measuring system defined for all the qualitative
and quantitative attributes. The consistent measurement
scale has facilitated to evaluate performance more reliably
for each attribute and sub-attribute.
References
Ames, H. (2006), Authentication from a cold chain
perspective, Pharmaceutical Commerce. Internet resource
http://www.pharmaceuticalcommerce.com/frontEnd/
main.php?idSeccion=327
Aramyan, L.H., Oude Lansink, A.G.J.M., Van der Vorst, J.G.A.J.
and Van Kooten, O. (2007), Performance measurement
in agri-food supply chains: a case study, Supply Chain
Management: An International Journal, Vol. 12 No.4, pp.
304315.
Beamon, B.M. (1999), Measuring supply chain
performance, International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, Vol. 19 No. 3, pp. 275-92.
Bogataj, M., Bogataj, L. and Vodopivec R. (2005), Stability
of perishable goods in cold logistic chains, International
Journal Production Economics, Vol. 9394, pp. 345356.
Gunasekaran, A., Patel, C. and Tirtiroglu, E. (2001),
Performance measures and metrics in a supply chain
environment, International Journal of Operations &
Production Management, Vol. 21 No. 1/2, pp. 71-87.
Joshi R., Banwet D.K. and Shankar R. (2009), Indian cold
chain: modeling the inhibitors, British Food Journal, Vol.
111 No. 11, pp. 1263-1280.
Khan, A. U. (2005), The domestic food market: is India
ready for food processing? Conference on SPS Towards
Global Competitiveness in the Food Processing Sector,
5 September Pune, India. Internet resource http://
nationalrenderers.org/assets/essential_rendering_book.
pdf
Mangina, E. and Vlachos I.P. (2005), The changing role
of information technology in food and beverage logistics
management: beverage network optimization using
intelligent agent technology, Journal of Food Engineering,
Vol. 70 No.3, pp. 403420.
Salin, V. and Nayga, R.M. (2003), A cold chain network for
food exports to developing countries, International Journal
of Physical Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 33
No. 10, pp. 918 933.
Smith, G.C.,Tatum, J.D., Belk, K.E., Scanga, J.A., Grandin, T.
and Sofos, J.N. (2005), Traceability from a US perspective,
Meat Science, Vol. 71 No.1, pp. 174-193.
Sowinski, L. (1999), Keep your big deal from melting away:
shipping perishables call for efficiency and expertise,
World Trade, Vol. 12 No.3,
pp.70-72.
Thron, T, Nagy, G. and
Wassan,N. (2007), Evaluating
alternative supply chain structures for perishable products,
The International Journal of Logistics Management, Vol.18
No.3, pp. 364-384.
Viswanadham, N., (2006), Can India be the food basket for
the world? working paper series ISB Hydrabad. Internet
resource www.isb.edu/faculty/Working_Papers_pdfs/Can_
India_be_the_Food_Bask et_for_the_World.pdf
------------------------------------
...Maintaining a cold chain is a more complicated process
than it is perceived to be.....
Crossword Answers
Across Answers
2. VALUE
3. POLICIES
6. CORPORATE
8. VOICE
9. INTERFUNCTIONAL
10. DISTINCTIVE
Down Answers
1. QUALITY
3. PRODUCTDESIGN
4. OBJECTIVES
5. OPERATIONS
7. INVENTORY
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
22
Carbon Footprint in Supply Chains
and Ways to address the same
What is Carbon Footprint?
Carbon footprint which results in global warming is a
subject that is being hotly discussed all over the world.
In fact, the countries of the world have got together un-
der Kyoto Protocol ( an international agreement linked
to the United Nations Framework Convention on Cli-
mate Change) to discuss this major issue and to commit
to corrective action. As of August 2011, 191 countries
have signed and ratified the protocol. Before understand-
ing what carbon footprint is, it is necessary to know the
meaning of Greenhouse gases. (GHG)
Greenhouse gases include the many heat-trapping trace
gases that reside in the earths atmosphere. Two common
greenhouse gases are water vapour and carbon dioxide.
Methane, ozone (03), CFCs, and nitrogen oxides are some
others. These gases absorb infrared radiation and help
regulate the planets climate. This regulation is called the
greenhouse effect.
While we actually need the gr e e nhous e
effect to survive on planet earth, ex-
cessive GHG become h a r m f u l ,
resulting in global warming or
climate change. Cur- rently, the
world has excess of Greenhouse
Gases. Activities such as burn-
ing coal and oil, driving cars
with gasoline, rais- ing livestock
and other human- based activities
create greenhouse gases. Natural calamities
like volcanoes also re- sult in greenhouse gas-
es, but human activity results in the largest
amount of greenhouse gases.
Carbon Footprint re- fers to the amount
of greenhouse gas- es produced in
our day-to-day lives through burning
fossil fuels for electric- ity, heating and
transportation etc. A car- bon footprint is a
measure of the impact our activities have on the
environment, and in particular climate change. Just as we
leave footprints when we walk on sand or mud or with
wet feet, our activities leave carbon footprints. Thus the
carbon footprint is a measurement of all greenhouse gas-
es we individually produce and has units of tonnes (or kg)
of carbon dioxide equivalent. There are different methods
of calculating the emissions for different activities. The
measurement techniques are outside the purview of this
article but a few examples are mentioned as below.
A 2.5 tonne AC emits 3 Kgs of CO2 in an hour. A geyser
generates 3.3Kgs of carbon per hour. A car that gives a
mileage of 10 kilometres per litre of petrol leaves 232
grams of CO2 per km.
Between 1991 and 2005, CO2 emission has gone up by
25% worldwide. It is expected to increase at a faster rate
if actions are not taken to reduce carbon emissions.
Effects of Global Warming
Recent studies have shown that unimaginable catastrophic
changes in the environment will take place if the global tem-
peratures increase by more than 2 C (3.6 F). A warming of
2 C (3.6 F) corresponds to a carbon dioxide (CO2) concen-
tration of about 450 ppm (parts per million) in the atmos-
phere.
As of beginning of 2007, the CO2 concentration is already at
380 ppm and it rises at an average of 2 - 3 ppm each year,
so that the critical value will be reached in
approxi - mately 25 to 30 years from now.
The in- crease in temperature will
lead to significant disruption in
a g r i c u l - ture, like food availability
l e a d i n g to increased food prices.
There will be increase in heat related
di seases, like malaria, heatstroke
etc. Storms and hurricanes like Kat-
rina may be- come more frequent. Wild
life species will either become extinct or will be
close to extinction. If the carbon levels keep
increasing at the present rate, by middle of this
century, a quar- ter of our existing species
will be non- existent. This will have a lot of
damaging ef- fects, because of the reduced
bio activity. For e.g. some pests which are con-
trolled by such species will roam more freely
and will signifi- cantly reduce food available to
human beings.
Another issue is the rise in sea levels. In the 20th century,
the worldwide average temperature climbed 0.6 degrees Cel-
sius. In 2001, the IPCC (Intergovernmental Panel on Climate
Change) reported that the worlds average temperature will
increase by between 1.4 and 5.8 degrees Celsius by end of
this century As these rising temperatures melt ice, especially
in Greenland and Antarctica, and create thermal expansion,
sea levels will rise by 20 inches to three feet higher by the
end of the century than they are today. 70% of human activi-
ties in the world happen by the side of sea and a rise in sea
level will erase a significant portion of our civilized world.
In Australia, over 700,000 buildings have been estimated as
being at risk of the effects of rising sea levels. There will be
mass migration of population from the coastal areas to the
interior and Governments will be hard pressed to handle
such a migration.
How to reduce Carbon Footprint in Supply Chain?
In a supply chain, carbon footprints exist at every stage,
starting from the supplier and downstream up to the cus-
tomer. Even when the customer uses the products, he cre-
ates carbon footprint. There are various ways by which an
organization can reduce carbon footprint in supply chain.
Even a small job like replacing a tube light with CFL will
help. Avoiding photocopies or taking printouts on both sides
of the paper will contribute their own small bits to reduced
carbon footprints.
1. AVOID WASTE
One most important factor is avoidance of waste. A waste
means that the item has to be produced again, which re-
sults in unwanted CO2 emission.
Author
Prof. K.L. Bhaskaran CFPIM, CSCP, CTL,CPM
Adjunct Faculty, IIM Kozhikode
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
23
It is essential that companies control their quality and
inventories closely to ensure that wastage is avoided.
2. MAINTAIN YOUR MACHINES
Another aspect is proper machine maintenance. A ma-
chine that is not maintained properly tends to contrib-
ute more CO2 than a well maintained machine.
3. REDUCE USE OF ENERGY
One method of reducing carbon footprint is to analyse
the use of energy and reduce the same. This should
start at the stage of product design itself. For exist-
ing products, companies should analyse various ways
of reducing use of energy and other resources used in
manufacturing.
4. USE RENEWABLE ENERGY
Companies should try their best to use renewable en-
ergy rather than fossil fuels.
5. RESUE/RECYCLE
The companies should try to reuse/ recycle materials.
Products should be designed so that the components
and packaging materials can be more easily separated
for reuse/ recycle. A well planned end of product life
cycle design should take into account potential for re-
use at its best and recycle at its worst. Recycling con-
sumes far less energy and thus emits less CO2 as com-
pared to fresh manufacture. Countries like Germany
require that the domestic brewers should use refillable
bottles.
6. ACHIEVE COMPONENT COMMONALITY
The product design should also aim to reduce the va-
rieties of components among different product groups,
so that longer production runs can be made to reduce
energy consumption. Also, if a product becomes obso-
lete, the components can be used in other products,
without the need to produce new components.
7. PLANT TREES
Tress should be planted wherever possible, as they ab-
sorb CO2. An I.T. Company in its tech park in Bangalore
has planted plants and preserved the old trees which
absorb atmospheric carbon dioxide, leading to the car-
bon sequestration and reduced emissions. The compa-
ny is positive in carbon foot prints and has become an
environment-friendly company
8. REVIEW LOGISTICS
One area in Supply Chain where Carbon Footprint plays
a major role is in Logistics. Every mode of transporta-
tion emits CO2. In India, with road conditions being
what they are, there is excess fuel consumption than
what it should be and as such, excess CO2 is released
into the atmosphere.
While developed countries follow B-O-O-T or B-O-T
business model, we seem to follow the business mod-
el of B-N-R, namely, Build, Neglect and Rebuild. Poor
roads in India cost the Government Rs.35, 000 crores
every year. Poor roads result in excess wear and tear of
the vehicle, excess fuel consumption, increased travel
time, all leading to increased CO2 emission.
Another aspect is proper Logistics planning by which
the Logistics department should always strive to load
the trucks fully rather than send less-than-truck loads.
This will save fuel and result in less carbon emission.
9. AVOID UNNECESSARY PACKING
Unnecessary additional packing should be avoided as
this will lead to increased weight and additional fuel
consumption. Also, the additional packing will need to
be manufactured which again results in carbon emis-
sion.
Conclusion
The increased carbon footprint in the environment
is a threat to our life and it is not a problem of only
Governments and industries. (Some Governments are
planning to bring in legislations for the same.) At the
end of it all, it is the individual who will be affected. It
is absolutely essential that the efforts to reduce carbon
footprint is ingrained in the minds of every individual
and organization. This is a war and the world has to
win, if humanity has to survive.
__________________________________
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
24
A Note on
Sustainable Supply Chain Management
Introduction
Sustainability or sustainable development is a
much-discussed and significant topic of today in
the light of increasing environmental degradation
(global warming, depletion of the ozone layer
etc.) and violation of human rights (Gladwin et
al., 1995). Sustainable development is defined
as the development that meets the needs of the
present generation without compromising the
ability of future generations to meet their own
needs (World Commission on Environment
and Development, 1987, also known as the
Brundtland Commission). Sustainability has three
dimensions: economic, social and environmental,
also known as the triple bottom line or 3BL, as
shown in Figure 1.
While economic viability is necessary for an
organization to survive, it is not sufficient to
sustain the organization in the long run if it
causes irreversible damages to the ecosystem
by emitting greenhouse gases (GHG) and toxic
wastes and depleting non-renewable resources
or it fails to ensure safety, security, dignity,
healthcare, minimum wage, indiscrimination and
better working conditions for its employees, the
community and the society in general. Therefore,
it has become imperative for any organization
to behave in a socially and environmentally
responsible manner while trying to achieve its
economic goals.
Evolution of Sustainable Supply Chain
Management
Although supply chain management has been
widely studied since the last two decades, the
discussion on sustainability in the supply chain
literature has gained momentum since the early
2000s.
Author
Prof. Subrata Mitra
Operations Management Group
Indian Institute of Management Calcutta
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
25
Figure 2 traces the evolution of supply chain management
(SCM) through the last four decades.
The evolution of SCM can be traced back to distribution
management in the 1970s where there was no coordination
among the various functions of an organization, and each
was committed to attain its own goal. This myopic approach
transformed into integrated logistics management
in the 1980s that called for the integration of various
functions to achieve a system-wide objective. SCM, which
evolved in the 1990s due to increased competition and
globalization, further widens this scope by including the
suppliers and customers into the organizational fold, and
coordinating the flow of materials and information from
the procurement of raw materials to the consumption
of finished goods. The objectives of SCM are to eliminate
redundancies, and reduce cycle time and inventory so as to
provide better customer service at lower cost (Mitra and
Chatterjee, 2000). In the 2000s, it became imperative for a
company to not only incorporate suppliers and customers
into the supply chain, but also take into consideration the
interests of all the stakeholders including the community,
society, government, NGOs and other public interest
groups. The notion that besides fulfilling its economic
objectives, a supply chain has to behave in a socially and
environmentally responsive way gave birth to the concept
of sustainable supply chain management (SSCM).
SSCM in Relation to JIT, TQM and Lean
Manufacturing
SSCM is a natural extension of the earlier philosophies of JIT,
TQM and lean manufacturing, as argued by Corbett and Klassen
(2006). According to the authors, any system that minimizes
inefciencies is also more environmentally sustainable. Te
goal of TQM is zero defects while the goal of SSCM is zero
waste. Te statistical process control (SPC) tools for TQM are
also applicable to SSCM. TQM that integrates internal process
controls of suppliers, manufactures and customers, gives rise
to Total Quality Environmental Management (TQEM) when
other stakeholders and the natural environment are also taken
into consideration (See Figure 3).
Environmental and Social Dimensions in SSCM
In the context of supply chains, sustainability has been
referred to more in terms of conforming to environmental
norms and standards than meeting social expectations.
However, that does, in no way, mean that supply chains
are indifferent to their social responsibilities. The
agenda is gaining momentum in an increasing number
of global supply chains, and as a result, the International
Organization for Standardization (ISO) has initiated the
development of the ISO 26000 international standard
on social responsibility, following the well-known ISO
9000 and ISO 14000 standards on quality management
and environmental management systems, respectively
(Piplani et al., 2008). The role of environment comes more
often in the discussion on sustainable supply chains in
the context of environment-friendly product and process
design, supplier collaboration for green purchasing,
adoption of cleaner technologies, environmentally
safe storage and transportation of goods, and returns
management including disposal of end-of-life products
and product recovery for reuse and reselling on
secondary markets, leading to the evolution of phrases
such as reverse logistics, closed-loop supply chains
and green supply chains. Figure 4 represents a closed-
loop supply chain and the different product recovery
options based on the quality of returns and the degree
of disassembly
Implementation of SSCM Practices
In many developed countries in North America and
Europe, manufacturers are being held responsible
by law for collection, transportation and disposal or
recovery of their products and packaging after use since
areas earmarked for land-filling are gradually shrinking.
Even the awareness among the general public towards
environment-friendly products and processes has
substantially increased. There is a market for green
products, which is estimated to be in excess of USD 200
billion (Carter and Ellram, 1998). Since manufacturers
are now being held accountable for the entire life cycle
of their products, they should strive to design more eco-
friendly and easily recoverable products, and recover the
economic value as far as possible from returns. This would
not only help them achieve economic sustainability,
but also facilitate projecting their environmental
responsibility and building a green corporate image.
Incorporating SSCM practices into their organizations,
companies can realize first-mover, competitive
advantages that would be difficult for their competitors
to easily imitate. Also, they can explore new market
opportunities and lobby with the government to frame
laws and regulations to their advantage. For example,
BMWs initiative towards design-for-disassembly for
product take-back and recycling became a standard
for the German auto industry and gave BMW a definite
cost advantage over its competitors (Porter and van der
Linde, 1995; Shrivastava, 1995; Kleindorfer et al., 2005).
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y FACULT Y OP I NI ON
26
Further reviews and more on the implementation of SSCM
practices are available in Linton et al. (2007), Carter and
Rogers (2008), and Guide and van Wassenhove (2009).
Large MNCs such as Xerox, GE, GM, Volvo, HP, 3M and Dow
Chemical have made SSCM a part of their corporate mission.
3Ms Pollution Prevention Pays (3P) and Dow Chemicals
Waste Reduction Always Pays (WRAP) programmes have
saved the respective companies millions of dollars and
prevented thousands of tonnes of pollution over a number
of years. Du Pont invested in quality monitoring devices
to reduce production stoppages that not only lowered the
generation of scraps but also improved productivity. Tetrapak
innovated packaging technology to use recyclable materials
that conserves energy. Toshiba and Hitachi gained competitive
advantage by developing renewable acid-free batteries. Hitachi
redesigned its consumer products to reduce the disassembly
time (also the assembly time) for easy recovery and fast-
time-to-market. Toyotas hybrid petrol-electric car, Prius,
signifcantly reduced GHG emissions. Mazdas clean engine
using the rotary technology reduced carbon emissions. Tere
are many more examples of successful implementations of
SSCM practices in multinational corporations (Shrivastava,
1995).
Indian companies, especially the exporters, are also pressured
into implementing environmental standards by their
international clients. Automotive components manufacturers,
drugs and pharmaceuticals majors, and large buyers of textiles,
handicrafs, leather goods and food products in the USA and
Europe are now demanding environmentally responsive
behaviour from suppliers globally, including India (Mitra,
2004).
India is one of the top emitters of GHG, emitting about 1.5
billion tonnes of CO2 into the environment. India ranks
fourth in terms of total emissions and ffh in terms of per
capita emissions in the world (Source: http://www.worldbank.
org). In the event that India succumbs to the pressure from the
developed countries to agree to a mandatory cut in emissions
or it voluntarily sets a target for itself (e.g. 20% reduction in
emissions by 2020), there are signifcant implications for
Indian supply chains to reduce their carbon footprints in the
coming years. Although product take-back and recycling have
not caught up in India as much as in Europe due to a lack of
awareness and regulations, there are immense opportunities
for Indian corporations to participate in Clean Development
Mechanism (CDM) projects and earn carbon credits, which
can be traded on international climate exchanges. ITC Ltd., for
example, is currently involved in 8 CDM projects that will
significantly reduce the emission levels of ITCs different
divisions and enable it to earncarbon credits (Source:
Sustainability Report 2010, http://www.itcportal.com).
Therefore, it is imperative for both the policymakers and
the corporations that appropriate regulations are framed,
incentives are offered and awareness among the general
public is created to facilitate the widespread adoption
of SSCM practices that will not only fulfil the economic
objectives, but also address the environmental and social
dimensions of sustainability.
References
1. Carter, C. R. and L. M. Ellram (1998), Reverse
Logistics: A Review of the Literature and Framework for
Future Investigation, Journal of Business Logistics, Vol. 19,
No. 1, pp. 85-102.
2. Carter, C. R. and D. S. Rogers (2008), A Framework
of Sustainable Supply Chain Management: Moving
Toward New Teory, International Journal of Physical
Distribution & Logistics Management, Vol. 38, No. 5, pp.
360-387.
3. Corbett, C. J. and R. D. Klassen (2006),
Extending the Horizons: Environmental Excellence as
Key to Improving Operations, Manufacturing & Service
Operations Management, Vol. 8, No. 1, pp. 5-22.
4. Gladwin, T. N., J. J. Kennelly and T-S. Krause
(1995), Shifing Paradigms for Sustainable Development:
Implications for Management Teory and Research, Te
Academy of Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 874-
907.
5. Guide, Jr., V. D. R. and L. N. van Wassenhove
(2009), Te Evolution of Closed-Loop Supply Chain
Research, Operations Research, Vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 10-18.
6. Kleindorfer, P. R., K. Singhal and L. N.
van Wassenhove (2005), Sustainable Operations
Management, Production and Operations Management,
Vol. 14, No. 4, pp. 482-492.
7. Linton, J. D., R. Klassen and V. Jayaraman (2007),
Sustainable Supply Chains: An Introduction, Journal of
Operations Management, Vol. 25, pp. 1075-1082.
8. Mitra, S. (2004), Managing Environmental Issues
in Supply Chains, In: Sahay, B. S. (Ed.), Emerging Issues in
Supply Chain Management, Macmillan, pp. 60-68.
9. Mitra, S. and A. K. Chatterjee (2000), Managing
Relationships in Supply Chains of the 21st Century, In:
Seth, J. et al. (Eds.), Customer Relationship Management:
Emerging Concepts, Tools and Applications, Tata McGraw
Hill, pp. 336-345.
10. Piplani, R., N. Pujawan and S. Ray (2008),
Sustainable Supply Chain Management, International
Journal of Production Economics, Vol. 111, pp. 193-194.
11. Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde (1995), Green
and Competitive: Ending the Stalemate, Harvard Business
Review, Vol. 73, pp. 120-133.
12. Shrivastava, P. (1995), Te Role of Corporations
in Achieving Ecological Sustainability, Te Academy of
Management Review, Vol. 20, No. 4, pp. 936-960.
13. Tierry, M., M. Salomon, J. van Nunen and L.
N. van Wassenhove (1995), Strategic Issues in product
Recovery Management, California Management Review,
Vol. 37, No. 2, pp. 114-128.
14. World Commission on Environment and
Development (1987), Our Common Future, Oxford
University Press, Oxford, England.
___________________________
SUSTAINABILITY
STUDENT OPINION
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y S T UDE NT OP I NI ON
28
Industrial Ecology
Improving Operations Management
Definitions
Sustainability can be defined as development that meets
the needs of the present without compromising the ability of
future generations to meet their own needs.
i
As operations management is concerned with systems
that handle the delivery of a firms principal product or
service, the concept of sustainable operations management
projects the belief that it is possible to conduct efficient and
successful operations management while also addressing the
organizations impact on the environment.
Within successful adoption of such policy, all elements of an
organizations systems including procurement, operation
and delivery are impacted by
the need to conserve and
protect our environment.
As long ago as 1976, the
authors CJ Constable and
CC New projected that 80%
of an organizations capital
investment will be within the operations area. In a typical
industrial application, the majority of employees are retained
within the operating arena.
Sustainable operations management is not just concerned
with the ubiquitous supply-chain and the process of
introduction of raw material through completion and
delivery, but must also address the wider issue of design and
development, byproduct and waste disposal. An enterprise
should conduct a comprehensive life cycle analysis to ensure
that its sustainability efforts are as inclusive as possible.
As such, because all organizations must now be concerned
with and must proactively reduce their carbon footprint,
sustainable practices must be developed not just throughout
their business, but specifically targeted to operations.
ii
The Triple Bottom-Line
In the past, the traditional models had taken only economic
development as the driving force for a firm. With the advent
of sustainability, the bottom-line has extended itself into
three congruent goals
Economic goals
Social goals
Environment
The concept of TBL demands that a companys responsibility
lies with stakeholders rather than shareholders. In this case,
stakeholders refers to anyone who is influenced, either
directly or indirectly, by the actions of the firm. According to
the stakeholder theory, the business entity should be used as
a vehicle for coordinating stakeholder interests, instead of
maximizing shareholder (owner) profit.
iii
Theoretical discussions of sustainability tend to cover
all three elements of the triple bottom line. Research,
however has focused mainly on the relationship between
social performance and operational performance, or the
relationship between environmental performance and
operational performance.
Sustainability is then well developed theoretically, but
robust and generalizable simultaneous examinations
of all three elements of the triple-bottom-line are
generally absent. This is especially true in the operations
management literature where almost all of the research
examines environmental issues while overlooking the
people / social component of sustainability.
iv
One of the highly talked about approach to create
a balance between operations management and
environmental issues is Industrial Ecology.
Industrial Ecology
Industrial Ecology aims at viewing the need of operation
management not in isolation from its surrounding
systems but in concert with them. One seeks to optimize
the total materials cycle from virgin material to finished
material to component to
product, to obsolete
product, and to ultimate
disposal. Factors to
be optimized include
resources, energy, and
capital.
v
In the words of Graedel and Allenby:
Industrial ecology is the means by which humanity
can deliberately and rationally approach and maintain
sustainability, given continued economic, cultural, and
technological evolution. The concept requires that an
industrial ecosystem be viewed not in isolation from
its surrounding system, but in concert with them. It is
a systems view in which one seeks to optimize the total
materials cycle from virgin material, to finished material,
to component, to product, to obsolete product, and to
ultimate disposal. Factors to be optimized are resources,
energy and capital
vi
Methods and Tools of Industrial Ecology
Industrial ecology offers a realm of methods and tools
to analyze environmental challenges at various levels
process, product, facility, national, and global and then
come up with responses to facilitate better understanding
and provide suitable remedies. We discuss some of the
important components in the industrial ecology toolbox
below:
Life Cycle Assessment
vii
A central tenet of industrial ecology is that of life-
cycle assessment (LCA). The essence of LCA is the
examination, identification, and evaluation of the
relevant environmental implications of a material,
process, product, or system across its life span from
creation to disposal or, preferably, to recreation in the
same or another useful form. The formal structure of
LCA contains three stages: goal and scope definition,
inventory analysis and impact analysis, each stage being
followed by interpretation of results (SETAC, 1993).
...Industrial ecology is the means by which
humanity can deliberately and rationally approach
and maintain sustainability, given continued economic,
economic, cultural, and technological evolution...
Author
Mr. Himanshu Joshi
Executive Post Graduate Program,
Indian Institute of Management Bangalore
OP S WOR L D S US TAI NAB I L I T Y S T UDE NT OP I NI ON
29
The concept is illustrated in Figure as under:
First, the goal and scope of the LCA are defined. An inventory
analysis and an impact analysis are then performed. The
interpretation of results at each stage guides an analysis of
potential improvements (which may feedback to influence
any of the stages, so that the entire process is iterative).
There is perhaps no more critical step in beginning an
LCA evaluation than to define as precisely as possible the
evaluations scope: What materials, processes or products
are to be considered, and how broadly will alternatives
be defined? To optimize
utilization of resources in
an LCA exercise, the depth
of analysis should be keyed
to the degree of freedom
available to make meaningful choices among options, and to
the importance of the environmental or technological issues
leading to the evaluation.
Design for Environment
viii
Product design engineers are always faced with the
challenge of optimizing the multitude of attributes that
determine the success or failure of the product. The
paradigm for such design considerations is termed Design
for X (DfX), where X may be any of a number of attributes
such as assembly, compliance, disassembly, environment,
manufacturability, reliability, safety and serviceability.
Design for Environment (DfE) is the DfX-related focus of
industrial ecologists. The core theme of DfE philosophy is
that it should improve the environmentally related attributes
of a product while not comprising other design attributes
such as performance, reliability, aesthetics, maintainability,
cost, and time to market. DfE approaches systematically
evaluate environmental concerns during the product life
cycle stages of pre-manufacture, manufacture, delivery &
packaging, use, and end of life and accordingly set targets
for continual improvements. The choice of materials during
pre-manufacture and their efficiency of utilization during
product manufacture, energy use during manufacturing
and product use, environmentally friendly disposal or
reincarnation of products at end of life are some of prime
considerations in DfE. DfE is also a win-win proposition
in that it provides a corporation with a competitive
edge in an ever-tightening regulatory environment thus
providing ongoing product innovation.
Industrial Symbiosis
ix
The industrial ecologist views the economy as a
closed system, similar to a natural system, in which
the residues from one system are the nutrients for
another. The concept known as industrial symbiosis is
a current topic of research for industrial ecologists and
environmentalists in identifying strategies to enable
businesses to `close the loop. The objective is to create
or encourage the formation of industrial production
systems that function similarly similar to biological
food chains. In either natural or industrial systems,
symbiosis occurs when two or more organisms form
an intimate association, either for the benefit of one of
them (parasitic symbiosis) or for both or all of them
(mutualistic symbiosis) such that there is high degree
of synergy between input and output flows of resources.
Industrial symbiosis may occur opportunistically or can
be planned. Planned industrial symbiosis appears to
offer the promise of developing industrial ecosystems
that are far superior environmentally to unplanned ones.
Such a system would need to involve a broad sectorial
and spatial distribution of participants, and be flexible
and innovative. The formation of ecologically balanced
industrial systems results in numerous environmental
and economic benefits. Economic benefits, which are
shared by participating businesses, governments,
and communities, are the primary driving force for
setting up such industrial
c o n f i g u r a t i o n s .
Entrepreneurs can
gain appreciable cost
savings from reduced
waste management, reduced infrastructure costs, and
improved process and product efficiency. There are
opportunities for other cooperative ventures such as joint
purchasing, combined waste recovery and treatment,
employee training, environmental monitoring, and
disaster response. The tangible environmental benefits
include the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions and
toxic air emissions, improving efficiency and conservation
in the use of energy, materials and water, improving
land use planning and green space development within
the industrial complexes, and promotion of pollution
prevention and recycling approaches.