Peer marking of decision making question: Goat Aid vs Computer Aid

Name of marker .. Name of person I am marking .

Please use highlighters to show evidence of any of the following in the response: - Answer gives ways in which the chosen scheme improves peoples quality of life (health, education, life expectancy). - Answer gives ways in which the chosen scheme provides an income and a living. - Answer gives ways in which the scheme is beneficial to the environment. - Answer considers the long term benefits of chosen scheme. - Answer gives specific examples, details, facts and figures to support. - Answer uses key geographical vocabulary sustainable, life expectancy, infant mortality rate, NGO, bottom up, aid, - Answer is well written, uses clear paragraphs and spelling and grammar is accurate.
Level 4 (13-16 marks) Well-developed reasons given as to why chosen option is more sustainable than other option with clear understanding of the term sustainable. Specific case study information is detailed and accurate. Well-developed reasons given for disadvantages of rejected option. Written work is legible and spelling, grammar and punctuation are very accurate and meaning very clearly communicated. Good use of geographical terminology.

Level 3 (9-12 marks) Developed reason(s) given as to why chosen option is more sustainable than other option with clear understanding of the term shown. Some reference to specific examples. Developed reason(s) given for disadvantages of rejected option. Written work is legible and spelling, grammar and punctuation are accurate. Meaning is clearly communicated. Use of geographical terminology.

Level 2 (5-8 marks) Mention made why chosen option is more sustainable that the other option but with limited understanding of the term sustainable. Some reference to specific examples. One or two simple reasons given for disadvantages of rejected option. Work is legible and spelling, grammar and punctuation are mostly accurate. Meaning is communicated with limited clarity.

Level 1 (1-4 marks) Limited reference made to why chosen option is more sustainable that other options. Limited or named reference to examples only. Disadvantage of rejected option covered in a limited way. Written work contains mistakes in spelling, grammar and punctuation which prevent meaning being expressed clearly.

Now that you have read level descriptors decide on the level of the response. Level 1-4 indicate or Answer gives ways in which the chosen scheme improves peoples quality of life (health, education, life expectancy). Answer gives ways in which the chosen scheme provides an income and a living. Answer gives ways in which the scheme is beneficial to the environment. Answer considers the long term benefits of chosen scheme. Answer gives specific examples, details, facts and figures to support. Answer uses key geographical vocabulary sustainable, life expectancy, infant mortality rate, NGO, bottom up, aid etc Answer is well written, uses clear paragraphs and spelling and grammar is accurate. Average level

I would award this response a Level I would give it /16

Teacher feedback