Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 155

Zero Accidents Best Practices

Presented by Jimmie Hinze University of Florida hinze@ufl.edu

ZERO
Incidents

Session 1
Introduction: Injury Statistics

Construction Fatalities by Year

Construction Worker Fatalities 2007-2009

How Do We Generally Measure Safety?


Most common: Injury Frequency >
OSHA recordable injuries per 200,000 hours, also called the recordable incidence rate (RIR)

What are OSHA recordable injuries



Injuries that require treatment by a physician Worker becomes unconscious at work All lost time injuries and fatalities are recordable >

If a physician conducts a diagnostic test on an


injured worker but does not perform treatment, it is not a recordable injury

Computing the RIR


Assume a project worked 400,000
hours and incurred 8 recordable injuries.

What is the RIR?


8 400,000 x 200,000 = 4.0

Safety Performance TRIR

4.3

A Disproportionate Number of U.S. Accidents Occur in Construction


6 to 7% of the industrial workforce is in
construction. Nearly 20% of the fatalities occur in construction. Over 12% of the disabling injuries occur in construction. Do these statistics have anything to do with firms serious about safety?

Source: U.S. Department of Labor Statistics

Costs of Injuries and Safety


High

Cost of Injuries

Cost
Low Low

Investment in Safety Level of Effort and Emphasis on Safety


High

Conceptual Representation

EMR Modifies the Workers Compensation Premium Example: Cost of Workers Compensation based on the
manual rate for the example company was $1,000,000.

Assume the EMR is 0.8. Workers Compensation premium actually paid is


$1,000,000 X 0.8 = $800,000.

If the EMR is 1.1, the premium = $1,100,000.

What is the average EMR?

1.0??? Thats a myth

Study of Contractors with Volumes of Work Over $1 Million


Workers Compensation Experience Modification Rate
Percent of Contractors in Study
45 40 35 30 25 20 15 10 5 0 < .30 .30.49 .50.79 .80.99 1.001.19 1.201.39 1.401.59 1.60

Source: Construction Financial Management Association, 1997 Construction Construction Industry Annual Financial Survey

Session 2
Causes of Accidents

Breakdown of Other Causes of Fatalities

How to Achieve Safety


1. Provide a safe work environment. 2. Dont permit unsafe, at-risk behavior. 3. Provide a rewarding work environment. 4. Make everyone responsible for safety.

ZERO
Incidents

Session 3
Good Safety Practices: Demonstrated Management Commitment, Staffing for Safety, and Safety Planning

Zero Accidents Two Studies


Information obtained from large construction firms through Surveys Site interviews on large construction projects

Source: CII Research Summary 160-1, Safety Plus: Making Zero Accidents A Reality

Zero Accidents Study


Varied Industries
Petrochemical Industrial Public works Transportation Hotel-casino Commercial buildings

U.S.-wide geographic area $50$600 million


Source: CII Research Summary 160-1, Safety Plus: Making Zero Accidents A Reality

Demonstrated Management Commitment


Includes headquarters and site
leadership.

Demonstrated Management Commitment


What portion of the recordable accidents are investigated by top management? Recordable Incident Rate

6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Every Injury Half or less

Demonstrated Management Commitment


Does the company president or senior
management review safety performance reports?
7.00
Recordable Incident Rate

6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Yes

No

Demonstrated Management Commitment


How frequently does the home office
perform safety inspections on the project?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Weekly or Bi-weekly

Monthly or Annually

Safety Staffing
Safety is everyones responsibility. Trained safety personnel are key
resources.

Safety Staffing
How many workers per safety person?
2.50
Recordable Incident Rate

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Up to 50

Over 50

Safety Staffing
To whom does the safety representative report?
2.50
Recordable Incident Rate

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Corporate or Staff

Line or Project

Safety Planning
Safety Risk Analysis of the Project Development of the Site-specific
Safety Plan

Job Hazard Analysis of Identified


Safety Risk Areas

Pre-Task Planning

Safety Planning
Does the project have a site-specific safety program?
6.00
Recordable Incident Rate

5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Yes

No

Safety Planning
Are pre-task meetings held?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

ZERO
Incidents

Session 4
Good Safety Practices: Safety Training and Education, Worker Involvement, and Participation, Recognition, and Rewards

Training
Transferring information to the workers

Safety Training and Education


Is safety training a line item within the budget?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Safety Training and Education


Does every worker on site receive a safety orientation?
6.00
Recordable Incident Rate

5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Yes

No

Safety Training and Education


Type of safety orientation provided to workers
4.00 Recordable Incident Rate 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Formal

Informal

Safety Training and Education


How much monthly training do workers
receive after orientation?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Over Four Hours

Up to Four Hours

Safety Training and Education


When are toolbox safety meetings held?
3.50
Recordable Incident Rate

3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Daily

Tuesday Thursday

Monday

Testing after Training Sessions


Are attendees at training sessions given a
test at the conclusion of the training period?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Worker Involvement

Worker Involvement and Participation


Does a formal worker behavior observation
program exist on the project?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Worker Involvement and Participation


Total number of safety observation
reports filed per 100,000 worker hours
Median Recordable Incident Rate

2 1.5 1 0.5 0

More Than 100

Up to 100

Worker Involvement and Participation


Are safety perception surveys
conducted on the project?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Other Means of Worker Involvement


Safety Committees Toolbox Meetings Job Hazard Analysis Incident Investigations Others?

Recognition and Rewards


Does the project have a formal worker
incentive program?
3.50
Recordable Incident Rate

3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Recognition and Rewards


How often are incentives given to workers?
3.50
Recordable Incident Rate

3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Weekly or Bi-weekly

Quarterly

Recognition and Rewards


Do family members attend safety dinners?
2.50
Recordable Incident Rate

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Recognition and Rewards


Are field supervisors evaluated on safety?
9.00 8.00 7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Recordable Incident Rate

Yes

No

ZERO
Incidents

Session 5
Good Safety Practices:

Subcontractor Safety Management, Accident/Incident Investigations, and Drug Testing

Subcontractor Management

General Contractor Influence on Subcontractor Safety Performance on Small Projects

Relative Importance to Safety

Source: CII Publication 13-1, Managing Subcontractor Safety

General Contractor Influence on Subcontractor Safety Performance on


Emphasize Safety in Communications

Large Projects
Provide Efficient Coordination

Subcontractor Management
Are subcontractors required to submit sitespecific safety plans?
4.00 Recordable Incident Rate 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Subcontractor Management
Do all subcontract workers attend a formal
safety orientation?
6.00
Recordable Incident Rate

5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Yes

No

Subcontractor Management
How frequently do subcontractors hold safety meetings?
2.50
Recordable Incident Rate

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Daily

Weekly

Subcontractor Management
Are there sanctions for subcontractor
non-compliance with safety standards?
6.00
Recordable Incident Rate

5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

Yes

No

Accident/Incident Reporting and Investigation

Accident/Incident Reporting and Investigation


Number of near-misses recorded per 100,000 hours

2.5
Recordable Injury Rate

2 1.5 1 0.5 0 5 or more less than 5

Accident/Incident Reporting and Investigation


What portion of the recordable accidents are investigated by top management? Recordable Incident Rate

6 5 4 3 2 1 0 Every Injury Half or less

Drug Testing

Drug Testing
Are random drug tests conducted?
3.00
Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes (22)

No (14)

Drug Testing
What percentage of random tests are positive?
Recordable Incident Rate

2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Less than 10% 10% or More

Drug Testing
What percentage of the workforce was tested in random tests?
1.4
Recordable Incident Rate

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

100% Testing (4 firms)

Typically 10% Testing (23 firms)

Drug Testing:
Is follow-up testing conducted?
1.4
Recordable Incident Rate

1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

Yes (5)

No (22)

Drug Testing
Does the owner require the contractor to do drug testing?
4.00 Recordable Incident Rate 3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes (53)

No (4)

Key Practices in Getting to Zero



Demonstrated management commitment Staffing for safety Safety planning pre -project / pre -task pre-project pre-task Safety training and education Worker involvement and participation Recognition and rewards Subcontractor management Accident/incident reporting and investigation Drug and alcohol testing

Project Safety Performance


Results of implementing key practices
3.84 Recordable Incident Rate

4.00 3.00

38 38 workers workers per per1000 1000 20 20workers workers per per1000 1000

2.00

2.00 1.00 0.00


Jobs That Implement no more than 40%
Sample Mean Implement 46 to 84%
22workers workers per per1000 1000

0.17 Jobs That Implement 85% or more

Source: CII Research Summary 160160-1, Safety Plus: Making Zero Accidents A Reality

ZERO
Incidents

Session 6
People Resourcing, Planning, and Scheduling for Shutdowns, Turnarounds and Outages

Unique Nature of Shutdowns and Turnarounds


Rapid Buildup of the Workforce Tight Schedule (Round-the-Clock Effort)

Key Practice Results


Identified best practices result in significantly lower recordable injury rates. These represented the best of the best.

Rapid Buildup of the Workforce


Where do the shutdown workers come from?
2.50
Recordable Incident Rate

2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00 From the area, but not familiar with project Transfer from other projects, familiar with type of work done

Planning and Scheduling


Is software used to schedule the project?
3.50
Recordable Incident Rate

3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Planning and Scheduling


What units of time are used on the project schedule?
1.6 1.4 1.2 1.0 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0

Recordable Incident Rate

Days

Shifts

Hours

Worker Familiarity and Scheduling by the Hour


2.0
Recordable Incident Rate

1.5 1.0 0.5 0.0

Not Familiar and Not Schedule by Hours

Familiar or Schedule by Hours

Familiar and Schedule by Hours

Worker Fatigue
Duration of Shutdowns
1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Less than 2 Weeks Two Weeks or Longer

Project Safety Performance on Shutdowns Results of implementing key practices


Recordable Incident Rate

2.50 2.00 1.50

2.37

24 24 workers workers per per1000 1000

88workers workers per per1000 1000

0.79

1.00 0.50 0.00

00workers workers per per1000 1000

0.00

Implement Less Than 40%

Implement At Least 80%

Implement All

ZERO
Incidents

Session 7
Owners Role in Safety

Conducting the Research


Personal interviews
Owner Project Management Contractor Project Management

Source: CII Research Summary 190-1, The Owners Role in Construction Safety

Types of Projects New Renovation 19%


50% Public 10.2% Private 89.8% Shutdown 10% Combined 10% Maintenance 5%

Manufacturing 32.2%

Open Shop 32.2%

Commercial 6.8% Civil work 1.7% Utilities 8.5% Petrochemical 50.8% Union 32.2%

Mixed 35.6%

Size and Safety Performance


Avg. hours expended: 2.4 million hours per
project

Average project cost: $380 million Safety record:


1.95 RIR

Total Project Data


Total project hours = 143 million hours Cost = $21 billion

Project Characteristics
What type of owner?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Private

Public

Project Characteristics
What type of contract?
2.50 2.00 1.50

RIR
1.00 0.50 0.00

Design-Build

General Contract

Project Characteristics
Shutdowns versus other types of projects
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Shutdowns

All Others

Project Characteristics
How many shifts?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

One

Two or Three

Project Characteristics
How many days worked per week?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Four or Five

Six or Seven

Selection of Safe Contractors

Selection of Safe Contractors


How important is safety in contractor review? (7 is most important)
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

5 or less

6 or 7

Selection of Safe Contractors


Is RIR used to evaluate contractor safety performance?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Selection of Safe Contractors


What is the highest acceptable RIR for contractor selection?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Less than 2.0

2.0 or Greater

None Set

Selection of Safe Contractors


Are personnel qualifications reviewed when contractors safety is evaluated?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00
Safety Staff Project Mgmt. Team

RIR

Yes

No

Contractual Safety Requirements

Contractual Safety Requirements


Does the contract require at least one full-time safety professional on site?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Yes

No

Contractual Safety Requirements


Does the owner approve contractor safety professionals?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Yes

No

Contractual Safety Requirements


Contractor Must:

Provide specified minimum training for workers. Submit a site-specific safety plan. Submit a safety policy signed by contractor CEO.

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Safety Program Components

Emergency plan (medical and hazardous materials) Daily JSA (Job Safety Analysis) conducted on project site Substance abuse program Specific safety training program Task-specific personal protective equipment (PPE) analysis Safety responsibility defined for all levels Emergency response team maintained on the project

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Safety Program Components (continued)

Prime contractors employees to have 10-hour OSHA cards OSHA specific regulations Prime contractors supervisors to have CPR and first aid cards Training on the hazards related to job tasks Pre-project safety planning Conduct regular safety inspections Incident reporting and investigation Regular safety meetings

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Does the owner maintain injury statistics by contractor?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Are contractor injury statistics included in the owners safety performance?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Does the owner provide extra funds (outside the contract) to promote project safety?
3.00 2.50 2.00

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Does the owner participates in the safety recognition program?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Who participates in worker orientation?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Contractor

Owner

Owner and Contractor

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Do owners representatives participate in safety and/or toolbox meetings?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Does the owners safety representative check project safety inspection records?
3.50 3.00 2.50 2.00 1.50 1.00 0.50 0.00

RIR

Yes

No

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


Are near-misses and job safety inspection reports monitored?
7.00 6.00 5.00 4.00 3.00 2.00 1.00 0.00

RIR

Both

Neither

Owners Involvement in Safety Management During Project Execution


What is the owners established goal for project RIR?
3.00 2.50 2.00
1.38 1.95 2.60

RIR 1.50
1.00 0.50 0.00

Zero

Greater than zero

No objective

ZERO
Incidents

Session 8
IMPLEMENTING FOCUSED SAFETY INITIATIVES Developing a program to address specific hazards

Safety Performance Continued Improvement

4.3

What Contributed to the Improvement in Safety Performance?

1. Worker Orientation 2. Toolbox Safety Meetings 3. Job Safety Analysis 4. Jobsite Safety Inspections 5. Safety Recognition Awards 6. Drug Testing 7. Pre-Task Planning 8. Safety Committees 9. Incident Investigations 10.Others

What is a Focused Safety Initiative?


A Program that is Designed to Address a Specific Hazard

Research Objective
Identify a Pattern in the Development and Implementation of Programs that are Designed to Address Specific Hazards Develop a Model or Template

Examples of Case Studies


Hand Hazards Underground Metal Detection Barricade Tape Program Loading and Unloading Trailers Eye Hazards Fall Protection for Steel Erection Housekeeping Back Strains

Program to Address Hand Hazards


Facility Construction &Services' Injuries by Body Part 25

Focused Program Initiated

20

Number of Injuries

15

Hand Injuries

Hands/Fingers Wrist Face/Teeth/Mouth/Eyes Arm/Shoulder Chest Leg, foot Back Neck

10

Multiple body parts

0 2000 2001

Year

2002

2003

2004

2005 end of June

Program Focused on Eye Hazards


Eye injuries constituted 41% of all worker injuries on a power plant project.

Eye Injuries were Running Out of Control

High Number of Eye Injuries Despite a 100% Eyewear Policy


Conditions were severe (esp.
iron filings)

Non-compliance had crept in

Focus was to Turn Things Around


Workers were reminded about eye safety Letters were sent to the workers stressing
eye safety Meetings stressed eye safety Eye safety posters were posted

DAUGHTERS WEDDING 2005

Implementation Case Study Yielded Dramatic Improvements

Safe Loading and Unloading of Trailers

Safe Zone 4 ft

3 Stanchions (min) 4ft

LaddersTiedOff NoDoubleTierStackingofMaterials TaglinesattachedtoRigging CraneOperatorsTrainedonthenewProcedures

Results:Noinjuriesin1,000Loads and500,000hoursofwork

HighLevelofCompliance

Focused Safety Implementation Model


Initiation Benchmark Champion Development Implementation Monitoring Corrective Action Measure of Success Success Recognition

Focused Safety Implementation Model


Initiation Benchmark Champion Development Implementation Monitoring Corrective Action Measure of Success Success Recognition

Established Policy

ZERO
Incidents

Session 9
The Value of Leading Indicators

Measuring Safety Performance


Number of OSHA Citations Claims History EMR Lost Workday Case Rate OSHA Recordable Injury Rate

Measurement

Manager action often uses the failure based measurement tools (management by exception) But these should be balanced with those that promote best practices (management by objective).

Traditional view of safety is from the pessimistic perspective. ( The focus is on our failures or management by exception) > Can we or should we change the way we look at safety?

Measurement is important to evaluate the efficiency of a process

Input

Process

output

Actions that Occurrence Promote Safe of Injuries Work Performance

Focus of Safety Management


Behavior this can be changed and it
can be controlled Focus on behavior that will lead to success (management by objective)

Two Types of Indicators


Lagging Downstream Trailing Reactive Response
Response Leading Upstream Predictive Proactive

Trailing or Lagging Indicators of Safety Performance


Lagging Indicators Fatality Lost Time Injury Medical Case Injury First aid injury Near Miss incidents Leading Indicators Efforts to Reduce Incident Occurrences 60000

Unsafe Conditions and Unsafe Behavior


Underlying Causes for Unsafe Behavior and Unsafe Conditions

Advantage of Using Lagging Indicators of Safety (the RIR and the EMR)
Advantages: They are accurate (hindsight is 2020) RIR and EMR are available for most firms They are widely accepted measures We think we understand these measures..

Disadvantages:
They are purely historical in nature No information is generally available
on what specific actions might be taken to improve the situation Data can be manipulated

Why has the industry adopted the lagging indicators?

These are used to satisfy regulatory


requirements Insurance companies use them >

But are our safety needs the same as


the regulatory and insurance bodies, if we truly want to aggressively promote safety?

The Construction Process


Contractor Superintendents Policies Subcontractors Owners Project Workers Managers Foremen Designers

Safety Performance ??

Should we change to a greater use of leading indicators?

This is not a suggestion that lagging


indicators will disappear Leading indicators provide a new approach to safety because they have a different purpose..

Leading Indicators of Safety Performance

They are focused on the safety


management process (not just numbers) They provide an indication (prediction) of the safety performance to be realized on a project..

What is the best leading indicator of safety? >


There probably is no best leading
indicator The indicators cover different processes so different indicators will be needed

Advantage of Using Leading Indicators of Safety Performance

If performance indicators are poor or


unacceptable, modifications or changes can be made before injuries actually occur Focus is on the process, not the end result

A Case Study
Large Projects (over 400,000 hours) Very Aggressive in Safety Promotion RIR of 0.56 Monitored 10 Leading Indicators of
Safety

Percent of worker observations that


were safe (A) Number of positive reinforcements provided per 200,000 hours (B) Percent closed audit findings (C) Percent of orientation sessions with Owner participation (D)

A=1 if the percentage is less than 90, 2 if


the percentage is 90-95, 3 if 95 or greater B=1 if the number is less than 250, 2 if between 250-1000, 3 if 1000 or greater C=1 if the percentage is less than 70, 2 if the percentage is 70-95, 3 if 95 or greater D=1 if the percentage is less than 70, 2 if the percentage is 70-90, 3 if 90 or greater

Score = 3A + 3B + C + D

RIR

Worker Observations and Positive Reinforcement: Score = A + B


1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Score=3 Score=4 Score=5or6
avg=1.13

RIR

avg=0.34 avg=0.11

Lets Start Using Leading Indicators of Safety


Lets not measure our injuries,
lets prevent them. Focus on strengthening areas of weakness in the safety process that contribute to injury causation..

Conducting A Self Assessment


What Are the Weaknesses in Your Firm? > Develop a Strategy and Address the Weaknesses

Owner Scorecard
Project Context, Contractor Selection, Contractual Safety Requirements and Owner Involvement in Project Safety
Project context: (1) Does the project work one shift? (2) Does the project work five days a week or less? Selection of contractor (3) Is the TRIR requirement for the contractor selection less than 2.0? (4) Are the qualifications of the project team reviewed? (5) Are the qualifications of the safety staff reviewed? (6) Does the evaluation of each contractors safety performance make a difference in awarding the contract?

Owners Scorecard (continued)


Contractual safety requirements

(7) Does the project use a design-build contract?

(8) Does the contract require the contractor to place at least one full-time safety representative on the project site?

(9) Does the contract require the contractor to submit all safety personnel rsums for the owners approval?

(10) Does the contract require the contractor to prepare a site-specific safety plan?

(11) Does the contract require the contractor to submit a safety policy signed by its CEO

(12) Does the contract require the contractor to provide a minimum specified amount of training to the construction workers?

Owners Scorecard (continued)


Contractor Safety Program Requirements Which of the following are required to be included in the contractors safety program? (13) Contractor must prepare a plan for site emergencies (14) Contractor must conduct pre-task safety planning on the project site (15) Contractor must implement a substance abuse testing program Owners involvement in project safety management (16) Does the owner's safety representative investigate near misses? (17) Are injury statistics on the projects maintained separately on each contractor? (18) Are all project injuries included in the owners overall measure of safety performance? (19) The owner actively participates (gives presentations) during worker safety orientation? (20) Comprehension of safety training is evaluated through testing? Which of the following activities are performed by the owners site safety representative? (21) Enforcing safety rules and regulations (22) Monitoring of the implementation of pre-task planning (23) Participating in safety recognition programs (24) Participating in safety and/or tool box meetings (25) Does the owner set zero injuries as its safety expectation before the commencement of site work?

Scorecard Values and Safety Performance

5 4.5

Recordable Incident Rate

4 3.5 3 2.5 2 1.5 1 0.5 0 Score <= 52% Score >= 88%

ZERO
Incidents

Its All About People


Maintaining the sustainability of our construction workers is our highest goal

Thank You

Вам также может понравиться