Ludermis Suardi ENG 112-72 Rasheedah Alexander 02/06/2014

Justice
What is the point of Justice?
Justice is the concept to maintain the right of all human beings and citizens to have an equal protection based on the law. It maintains the relationship concept between political philosophy and disciplines such as sociology, psychology, political sciences, and history. The point of justice is to govern the society with social practices and institutions to evaluate facts and demonstrate the purpose. The principles of justice is based on be adapted to governs a society to be accurate on the decisions make. The principles of justice have a requirement to meet everyone elses needs when it is possible to do. In addition to that, it is the principle ultimate which depends on the circumstances, the balance, benefits, and the serious needs where It can be met, or not. The basic structure of justice is to govern a society which also depends that human beings have an equal opportunity. The rules regulations mean to not make unreasonable demands on human being. It considered the facts for practical social purposes to secure and promote justice. MASON, ANDREW. What is the Point of Justice? Utilitas 24.4 (2012): 525-547. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Jan. 2014

Why Justice? Which Justice? Impartiality or Objectivity?

The structure of justice determines the political- legal in order of social and personal life. The human rights responsibility and demonstrates an effective benefit to provide norms, the structural norms on which the political order depends on. The effective power means to determine what is good, bad, or just to find another way. The structural level is the basic rules of political justice. The effective power has a point with the capabilities and freedom. The purpose of the principle of justice in a social political context is to determine the rules to protect the possibility of an action. In addition to that, the effective power and mutual benefit are rather different one to another. The structural level it is the authority that have to be under the political-legal order. In addition to that, it does not matter about the effective power, nor the mutual-benefit rules control exclusively because of the responsibility that justices have. To conclude, justice apply moral and it is for all human beings. RASMUSSEN, DOUGLAS B., and DOUGLAS J. DEN UYL. Why Justice? Which Justice? Impartially, or Objectivity?. Independent Review 17.3 (2013): 441-460. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Jan. 2014

5 Things You Need to Know about The Supreme Court

The Supreme Court it is an important role in our democracy. First, justices get their job for life. As the constitution said Federal judges, including Supreme Court Justices, serve during good behavior. a guarantee of life tenure, to protect them from fear of political reprisal for unpopular decisions. The state Rhode Island is the only one which provides life tenure for the court judges. The others states do not have the same benefits which it is probably because justice are providing serve for more time than usual. As Geoffrey R. Stone said, Justice has a conflicting set of obligations. The obligation is to serve and have interest of the nation. Second, how do cases get to the Supreme Court.? The justices only accept to have 1% of the 8,000, or many cases every year. The court is selective because they decide to heard and investigate about the case. The process of the court: the court hears appeals courts, the high court of all 50 states, and also the military justice systems high court. It would accept only four of the nine justices to place a case. The court is very strict deciding who is going to be inside the court. Third, how do the justices decide cases? An argument last an hour which is 30 minutes for each side. Lawyers will experience getting closer and interrupting one to the other. The law clerk which research, prepare the draft, and make the point the justice is going to make then will be sent to the other eight justices and make opinions about it. It would approximately take 6 weeks to more than 6 months. Fourth, why are so many decisions 5 to 4? The Supreme Court is divided in four

conservative justices, four liberal justices, and the swing justice who decides which side wins the case. Fifth, does the court ever change its mind? Smith, Patricia Stolberg, Sheryl Gay. 5 Things You Need to Know about The Supreme Court. New York Time Upfront 146, 7, p.8, Master FILE Complete, EBSCOhost, viewed 28 Jan 2014.

How Public Opinion Constrains in the U.S. Supreme Court

The observation of the public opinion about the Supreme Court influence in the way people interpret the different judgment about the debate in the justice. The articles proceed to develop a strategy to control the social forces which influence in the public opinions and court. The Supreme Court considerate to make a strategic behavior and attitudinal changes perspectives the reason of this is because the public opinions are putting in risk the Supreme Court. The social media is calling the attention such as the news media, public, and government which make an important effect on the decision of the Supreme Court. Depending on the personal and legal consideration the court ignores the public critics even though it influences the Supreme Court justice. The social forces will change the public opinions. For salient cases, it follows public preferences in order to maintain institutional legitimacy. No salient cases in which the court reflect popular opinions. The public opinions and the Supreme Court influence the social forces. Casillas, Christopher J., Peter K. Enns, and Patrick C. Wohlfarth. How Public Opinion Constrains The U.S Supreme Court. American Journal of Political Science 55.1 (2011): 74-88. Business Source Complete. Web. 28 Jan. 2014

Domination and Distributive Justice

As explained the liberalism critics against the political doctrine. The liberalism has different meaning from liberal institution that have to do with social and political. The two choices to work on pluralism are that reduce the plurality of choices for the doctrine. Second, the normative point can see the society that it has to be organized in a way to a system of collaboration. A society where the people decide to do what they want to do. Examples of this, the liberalcontractualist fail in attacking the deliberative democrats in approving the same rights and same opportunity for man and woman and the equal opportunity for the different culture. The socioeconomic expect to have equal benefits for all in social and political institution. A society should be dependent which mean a person should dominate the others. The points of this, the people stop receiving unconditional income which mean low levels income trading it for freedom in order to do the basic needs. Lovett F. Domination and Distributive Justice. Journal of Politics 71.3(2009): 817-830. Academic Search Complete. Web. 28 Jan. 2014

Global Justice and Practice- Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism

The distributive justices decide the rights of each person. The principle of justice, the social status is which give the rights and opportunities. The institutionalisms mean to develop the right understanding of justice which determines the democratic political process of society which is the rules of the global distributive justice. The institutionalism in justices the principles is the purposes and form of improve cultural conventionalism. The functionalism is a belief in empirical evidence to practice equal rights to accomplish their strategy in life. In addition to that, the social and politic institutions have an important role in the constitutional democracy. Based on the function of the principles of distributive justice claim the different idea and also respect others equal rights to accomplish their goals. The distributive also defends the domestic context where people are the one that infers and morality. The international morality which has more authority demands than support. To conclude, the function of justice is to defend and protect people.

VALENTINI, LAURA. Global Justice and Practice-Dependence: Conventionalism, Institutionalism, Functionalism. Journal of Political Philosophy 19.4 (2011): 399.418. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Jan. 2014

The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice

The structure and principles of justice expect to respond to the distributions, guide individualism actions, and institutional design. The principles of justice develop the economic and political institutions. The rational and non- rational on justice is the different argument of the global justice. The relational justice is the institution, and policies that control the social and economic institutions. The non- rational justice goes against that because it has different choice of the principles of justices. In addition to that, the rights and opportunity make justice to be more effective. The political institutions have an important role in the principle of justice in the content and control the strategy interaction. The main reason why justice is institutional is because of the social and economic systems. For examples, welfare and health care which are necessary to do. To close this, the political and economic institutions are necessary to follow the values. The institution is necessary also because it develops authority decisions and conducts.

Miklos, Andras. The Basic Structure and the Principles of Justice. Utilitas 23.2 (2011): 161182. Academic Search Complete. Web. 29 Jan. 2014.

Book source: Justice and Equity

As explained on the book Justice and Equity, to provide a social and economic ethics and justice to find the solution of the problems. It also explains the equal opportunity and equal liberty for people. Liberty has different meanings such as power, right, and actions. In addition to that, the social and economic situation people suffer disease problems because of the good needs. The Fundamental preferences and utilities, means people decide what their preferences are because they have an important purpose to make that decision even the basic need not all are satisfied. People decide what make them feel complete and happy. The concept of the social ethnics is to have direct and indirect preferences about the utilities to represent the different choices. To conclude, people have the fundamental preferences to choose what they want and make the best choices and decision for them because of the Equal opportunity, and equal liberty, because they have the privileges and liberty, or properties and welfare.

Kolm, Serge- Christophe. Justice and Equity. Cambridge, MA: Massachusetts Institute Of Technology Press, 1997. EBook Collection (EBSCOhost). Web. Jan 29. 2014.

Video source: Justice for All

The record arrest is the number of people that go into court. Every year, the record arrest increase, the civil cases continue, legislator cut criminal and civil court budgets. A judge declares that there is not enough money for the justice system. As explained, defenders office does not have the fund to defense people who are guilty. The public office defender and the District attorney explained what they do and why they do it which represent why it is necessary to take this decision. The panel of judges explained the needs of money and the social issues that stop them to help some crimes. The lack of sources it is the main reason that stop the court to stop crimes. In addition to that, the justice center should include not only officers, but mental health and social services to discuss different problems associated with the prisoners in the court. To

close this, the panels propose to have solutions for the poor people that need legal services opportunity to the prisoners that are not guilty which is fair. And Justice for All? Films On Demand. Films Media Group, 1192. Web. 29 Jan. 2014