0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
87 просмотров2 страницы
Anyone who has ever gone to more than one art opening reception has some idea of the basic protocols involved. And yet, absurd, inexplicable violations of the unwritten rules can and do occur, such as a gallery assistant turning away at the door an artist in the current exhibit, or the same artwork being sold to two different patrons. Now, with this document, the excuse of these rules not being written down no longer applies.
Anyone who has ever gone to more than one art opening reception has some idea of the basic protocols involved. And yet, absurd, inexplicable violations of the unwritten rules can and do occur, such as a gallery assistant turning away at the door an artist in the current exhibit, or the same artwork being sold to two different patrons. Now, with this document, the excuse of these rules not being written down no longer applies.
Anyone who has ever gone to more than one art opening reception has some idea of the basic protocols involved. And yet, absurd, inexplicable violations of the unwritten rules can and do occur, such as a gallery assistant turning away at the door an artist in the current exhibit, or the same artwork being sold to two different patrons. Now, with this document, the excuse of these rules not being written down no longer applies.
The following rules have remained unwritten for many decades, because for the most part artists, gallery staffs and patrons obey them naturally. But, with one exception, I have witnessed a violation of every single one of these unwritten rules at one art gallery or another, sometimes just once, sometimes repeatedly. Hence I am writing them down. . The curator does not include his own wor! in the show, except with very good reason in the context of a group show. ". Any living persons depicted in the artwor! are invited to the opening reception. #. $heese and wine %red and white, from an uncor!ed or uncapped bottle, not a box, chilled as needed& are served at the opening reception. '. The donation or tip jar is mar!ed plainly and simply as such, and optionally with a suggested donation amount but nothing further. (. Artwor! that is not for sale is clearly mar!ed as such. ). *atrons wishing to ac+uire artwor! that is available for free will still run it by someone on the gallery staff so that the gallery,s records can promptly be updated accordingly. -. .mall red dots are placed in the vicinity of sold or ac+uired artwor! as soon as practically possible. /. All the gallery staff slated to wor! during the current exhibit have a good basic !nowledge of each artist and each piece in the current exhibit. Commentary on the rules . This one has been almost completely inverted to the point that people automatically expect the curator to include at least one of his own pieces in the show. 0ne possible good reason for the curator to include his wor! in the show is when the theme of the show re+uires collaboration and one of the artists would have to be excluded if the curator did not step in. Another good reason is when the curator,s wor! illuminates or in some direct way adds to the wor! of another artist in the show. ". They may decline, but they must be given a legitimate opportunity to accept the invitation. This applies the same whether the person is someone 1important,2 li!e the *resident of the 3nited .tates, or someone 1ordinary,2 li!e a homeless man. 0f course everyone will understand if the *resident does not show up to your art opening. But if the homeless man in your blac! and white photograph doesn,t show up, would people be justified in thin!ing you,re an opportunistic hypocrite4 #. 5otice that this does not re+uire the same old boring combination of 6erlot and $hardonnay every time, nor does it exclude, when appropriate, the inclusion of pin! wines, or of li+uor or of beer. 6albec and 6oscato, 7ambrusco and *inot 8rigio are but two possible alternatives to 6erlot and $hardonnay. A few patrons will be extremely discriminating, and a few will just want to get drun!, but the majority will appreciate there being something offered other than the same usual suspects. '. This means just 1donations2 or 1tips2 and maybe something li!e 1.uggested donation9 :(.2 5ot some lengthy paragraph explaining that the artists have wor!ed very hard on the show and that drin!s are expensive. The former should be obvious from the wor! on the walls, the latter from the bottles on the refreshments table. (. To my !nowledge, this is the only one of these rules I have never witnessed a violation of. ). ;hen an artist sets a confusing price on his artwor!, it invites a violation of this unwritten rule, and worse, it could unwittingly cause theft. A confusing price is something li!e 1:,<<< or free if you grab it and run out of the gallery li!e a madman.2 The patron could grab the wrong piece and thus unwittingly commit theft. -. Any color other than red is bound to cause confusion. Any si=e larger than the bare minimum to be clearly visible is needlessly gaudy. /. This one is to avoid a horrendously idiotic mista!e from happening, such as for example, a racist gallery assistant turning away one of the artists in the current exhibit during gallery hours. 3nfortunately, this has actually happened. It is of course wrong to racially screen what precious few people come to an art gallery during gallery hours, but it adds insult to injury when that person happens to be one of the artists in the current exhibit. The way some galleries avoid this is by only exhibiting white artists. But a better solution is to educate all the gallery assistants in the fact that non>white artists do in fact exist, and they create art of great merit.