Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 32

1

2
The OzBoy File
The Truth About Iraq

Written
By
Lloyd T Vance and Steve Johnson

3
The Truth About Iraq


The Freedom Collective Is a group of like minded people
dedicated to seeking peace and truth in a world of lies and deceit.



Freedom Collective The OZBOY FILE and associated logos and
certain images listed are copyright Trademarks and are not to be
copied or reproduced without express permission.

The images contained within this publication are shown and used
for illustrative purposes, have been found on public domain and
have used for educational use only and no ownership is implied or
intended unless stated specifically.


4
The Truth About Iraq
Introduction
Chapter 1 Real Reason We Invaded Iraq
Chapter 2 Treatment of USA Upon The Local People
Chapter 3 Next stop IRAN?
Chapter 4 Sept 11
th
2001 Iraq / Afghanistan
Chapter 5 Kevin Rudd Admits Going To Iraq Wrong
Chapter 6 The Downing Street Truth
Chapter 7 - Andrew Wilkie Rising to the Challenge

Conclusion



5
The Truth About Iraq
Introduction
Welcomed to The OzBoy File Truth About Iraq, there is a lot
which can be written about this subject a person would never stop
writing if we had to cover everything.
So we have tried to cover the main issues the AXIS Of Evil
Coalition countries did led by United States of America, England &
Australia.
Prime Ministers, Presidents of these above countries will get away
with committing murder and War Crimes against the people of Iraq
and nobody in their Governments will hold them accountable.

Number Of Iraqis Slaughtered In US War And Occupation Of
Iraq "1,366,350"


6
The Truth About Iraq

Number of U.S. Military Personnel Sacrificed (Officially
acknowledged) In U.S. War And Occupation Of Iraq 4,715

Number Of International Occupation Force Troops Slaughtered
In Afghanistan : 1,752

Cost of War in Iraq & Afghanistan
$991,433,261,980

I have said to Steve a number of times it piss me off, if you or I
friends committed some crime we would have FBI, CIA, MI6, ASIO,
Australian Federal Police breaking out doors down armed to the
teeth with machine guns.


7
The Truth About Iraq
Yet President George Bush, Ex- Prime Minister Tony Blair and Ex-
Prime Minister John Winston Howard will get away with their
crimes of High Treason taking our countries to War on Fake
False evidence which they themselves made up to justify the Illegal
Invasion of Iraq.
New Governments and leaders in each of the above countries have
carried on from where George Bush, Tony Blair and John Howard
left off.
Chapter 1
Real Reason We Invaded Iraq
An oil law giving Bush's crony conquistadors a dominant hold on
Iraq's oil has always been the true "benchmark" of victory for the
White House.
And now it is within reach, the Iraqi parliament will vote on the law
next month with 140,000 American troops parked all around the
country, and American bombs falling on the capital.
Gee, wonder which way the vote will go?


8
For anyone who thinks that "bringing democracy" was the goal of
our invasion of Iraq, think again our kids have been dying and
getting maimed so that major oil companies could get control of
Iraq's oil, period, end of discussion.

US ACTIONS OF WAR AFTER 1945 Invading Other Countries and
Stealing Resources for the American Multi National Corporations
and making a Business for the Industrial Military Complex
Isnt this what the Nazi Fascist did in WW11?
Invade countries Rape the countries dry, steal, murder, kill, and
imprison people?


9
Iran / l953
GUATEMALA / l954
LEBANON / l958
PANAMA / 1958
VIETNAM / l960-75
LAOS / 1961
CUBA / l961
PANAMA / l964
INDONESIA / l965
DOMINICAN REPUBLIC /1965-66
GUATEMALA / l966-67
CAMBODIA / l969-75
OMAN / l970
LAOS / l971-73
CHILE / 1973
CAMBODIA / l975
IRAN / l980
LIBYA / l981
EL SALVADOR / l981
NICARAGUA / l981-90
HONDURAS /l982
LEBANON / l82-84
GRENADA / l983-84
LIBYA / l986
BOLIVIA /1987
IRAN / l987-88
LIBYA / 1989
PANAMA / 1989
LIBERIA / 1990
KUWAIT / 1991
AFGAHNISTAN / 2001
IRAQ / 2003

10
Chapter 2
Treatment of American Military Upon the local
population, this treatment equates to the
same similar what the Nazis use to treat
people


VIDEO - IRAQI CIVILIANS MASSACRED BY AMERICAN SOLDIERS NEAR BAIJI

On May 20, 2008 in the village of Al Mazraa, near Baiji, Salahuddin
Province, Iraq- Eight relatives and a neighbour on their way to a
homecoming party for a detainee released from Camp Bucca were
shot and killed by American soldiers as they waited on the road
outside the neighbourhood.

American soldiers were conducting raids in the area, so neighbours
had warned the family to stay away from the area until the patrol
was over.
As the two-car convoy was waiting nearby, an American helicopter
nearby opened fire on the vehicles.
As the vehicles were hit, the drivers attempted to seek cover, but
both vehicles were repeatedly shot and disabled.
The helicopter landed but instead of assisting those shot and
needing medical help, the American soldiers killed any survivors
and then wrote numbers on the foreheads of some.
Several children including a young girls body are clearly visible, and
the wounds suffered by the men are horrific.
The vehicle is clearly shot with many rounds and the seats and road
is covered with blood.
Iraqi police were called to the scene to remove the bodies, and
some video footage was taken.

11
It is clear that these people were unarmed civilians.
American troops did eventually enter the house where over 50
Iraqis were gathered for the homecoming party, and the soldiers
proceeded to destroy furniture and belongings as they conducted
their search.
No one in the house was harmed, The names of those killed: -
Sabah Rasheed Matrood
Saab Rasheed Matrood
Kamel Badr Daher
Ali Badr Daher
Udei Badr Daher
Fateh Haref Nouar
Abdul Rahman Kamel Badr



12
Chapter 3
Next stop IRAN?
http://informationclearinghouse.info/article3288.htm
Then onto the other 60 countries on American hit list to invade and
take control of the Oil & Gas and put them under American Multi
National Oil Companys Control for the sheer greed!
GREED of American Multi National Companies.
Other countries include; Russia, Canada, Australia, Africa, Asia,
Pacific.
Bush Planned Iraq 'Regime Change' Before Becoming
President
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1221.htm
Memo: Bush made Intel fit Iraq policy
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article8757.htm
UK Ministers Knew WMD Was "Excuse"
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article9111.htm
The president's real goal in Iraq
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article2319.htm
The Project for the New American Century.
http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm
America's War for Global Domination

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5428.htm





13
Chapter 4

Neocon Imperialism, 9/11, and the Attacks on
Afghanistan and Iraq

One way to understand the effect of 9/11, in most general terms, is
to see that it allowed the agenda developed in the 1990s by
neoconservatives-often called simply neocons---to be
implemented.

There is agreement on this point across the political spectrum,
From the right, for example, Stefan Halper and Jonathan Clarke say
that 9/11 allowed the preexisting ideological agenda of the
neoconservatives to be taken off the shelf . . . and relabeled as the
response to terror.

Stephen Sniegoski, writing from the left, says that it was only the
traumatic effects of the 9/11 terrorism that enabled the agenda of
the neocons to become the policy of the United States of America.

What was this agenda?

It was, in essence, that the United States should use its military
supremacy to establish an empire that includes the whole world--a
global Pax Americana.

Three major means to this end were suggested.



14
One of these was to make U.S. military supremacy over other
nations even greater, so that it would be completely beyond
challenge.

This goal was to be achieved by increasing the money devoted to
military purposes, then using this money to complete the
revolution in military affairs made possible by the emergence of
the information age.

The second major way to achieve a global Pax Americana was to
announce and implement a doctrine of preventive-preemptive
war, usually for the sake of bringing about regime change in
countries regarded as hostile to U.S. interests and values.

The third means toward the goal of universal empire was to use
this new doctrine to gain control of the worlds oil, especially in the
Middle East, most immediately Iraq.

In discussing these ideas, I will include recognitions by some
commentators that without 9/11, the various dimensions of this
agenda could not have been implemented.

Chapter 5

Going to war with Iraq was wrong, Australian
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd admits

In an admission that will make uncomfortable reading in London
and Washington, the Labour leader dismissed one-by-one the
reasons used by his predecessor, John Howard, to join the Anglo-
American invasion of Iraq five years ago.

Going to war with Iraq was wrong, Australian
Prime Minister Kevin Rudd admits



15
All the arguments Australia marshalled to justify sending troops to
fight in Iraq proved to be wrong, Prime Minister Kevin Rudd said
today, as the country's 550 combat soldiers headed home

Prime Minister Kevin Rudd has pulled the country's troops out of
Iraq
In an admission that will make uncomfortable reading in London
and Washington, the Labour leader dismissed one-by-one the
reasons used by his predecessor, John Howard, to join the Anglo-
American invasion of Iraq five years ago.
Have further terrorist attacks been prevented?
No, they have not been, as the victims of the Madrid train bombing
will attest," Mr Rudd told parliament.

Has any evidence of a link between weapons of mass destruction
and the former Iraqi regime and terrorists been found?
No.

16
Have the actions of rogue states like Iran been moderated?
No ... Iran's nuclear ambitions remain a fundamental challenge.
After five years, has the humanitarian crisis in Iraq been removed?
No it has not.
Mr Rudd, whose campaign for election last November included a
pledge to withdraw Australian combat forces from Iraq, said pre-
war intelligence had been "abused" by the Howard government.
He said there had been a "failure to disclose to the Australian
people the qualified nature of the intelligence - for example, the
pre-war warning that an attack on Iraq would increase the terrorist
threat, not decrease it".
Mr Rudd, a former diplomat, also dismissed his predecessor's
argument that Australia had been obliged to send troops to Iraq
because of its long-standing alliance with the United States.
He said while he valued the alliance highly, it did not mean that
Canberra should automatically accede to US requests for military
support.
His comments came a day after Australia's 550-strong combat force
began leaving its base at Tallil, 185 miles south of Baghdad.
Mr Howard, who has kept a low profile since being ousted from
office six months ago, said he was still convinced that being part of
the 2003 invasion of Iraq was justified.
"I firmly believe it was the right thing to have done," he said, while
acknowledging that it was the hardest decision he made as prime
minister and that the cost of the war had been "very, very heavy
and much greater than anybody would have liked".
His decision to send troops was deeply influenced by the fact that
he was in the US on an official visit on September 11, 2001, when
terrorists struck New York and Washington.

17
Mr Howard was one of four leaders who supported the US-led
coalition but who are all now out of office: Tony Blair, Jose Maria
Aznar of Spain and Polish president Aleksander Kwasniewski.
One of Mr Howard's former senior officials said the government
had been fully briefed on the fact that invading Iraq would damage
US prestige, foster anti-Western sentiment, require a massive troop
presence and destabilise the wider Middle East.
"All that was predictable and I don't think the benefits of the West
going in were worth the cost," the official, who declined to be
named, told the Sydney Morning Herald.
"That was my judgment at the time and that hasn't changed."
Australia will still have about 800 military personnel in and around
Iraq, including a 110-strong diplomatic security detachment in
Baghdad, sailors on board warships in the Persian Gulf and Royal
Australian Air Force crew.
Matilda is walzing home from Iraq, and the
Australians are lucky but chastened.
Lucky for having lost not one soldier in combat of the 2,000 sent to
join the coalition of the willing attack on Iraq in March 2003.

Chastened because Australian Prime Minister Kevin Rudd is now
pulling no punches in decrying the subservience of his
predecessor, John Howard, to Washington.

Announcing the withdrawal of the 550 Australian troops still in Iraq
on Monday, Rudd echoed recent charges by former White House
spokesman Scott McClellan about the Bush administrations
shading of intelligence to justify an unnecessary war.

Rudd told Parliament he was most concerned by the manner in
which the decision to go to war was made; the abuse of
intelligence information, a failure to disclose to the Australian
people.


18
The qualified nature of that intelligence and the governments
silence on the pre-war warning that an attack on Iraq would
increase the terrorist threat, not decrease it.
Rudd added: This government does not believe that our alliance
with the United States mandates automatic compliance with every
element of the United States foreign policy.
Stung by Rudds candor, White House spokeswoman Dana Perino
fell back on the canard that the entire world agreed on the threat
posed by Saddam Hussein.

As President Lyndon Johnson would have put it, That dog wont
hunt.

If all agreed, why then was President George W. Bush unable to
secure the approval of the U.N. Security Council, without which an
armed attack on another country is illegal under international and
U.S. law?

Among coalition of the willing leaders not named Bush, only the
faith-based former British Prime Minister Tony Blair hangs on
pathetically to the notion that everyone believed Saddam Hussein
had WMD.

This is particularly odd since Blair acknowledges the authenticity of
the (in) famous Downing Street Memos.

Perhaps his conversion to Catholicism will prompt him to confess
that he lied a reality long beyond dispute.

Chapter 6
The Downing Street Truth
As some will recall, Blair sent his intelligence chief off to
Washington in summer 2002 to confer with his opposite number,
and Bush intimate, CIA Director George Tenet.

19
In the spring of 2005, a patriotic truth-teller leaked to British media
the minutes of a summit meeting of UK national security officials
convened on July 23, 2002 at 10 Downing Street.

(The minutes, which became known as the Downing Street Memos,
were composed that same day by one of those officials and sent to
the other participants.)

The minutes revealed that at CIA headquarters on July 20, 2002,
Tenet informed his British counterpart that President Bush had
decided to attack Iraq for regime change that the war would be
justified by the conjunction of weapons of mass destruction and
terrorism; and that the intelligence and facts were being fixed
around the policy.

So we did not really need Scott McClellans recent revelations to
understand that the intelligence was fixed, even though our
countrys fawning corporate media (FCM) made a Herculean effort
to suppress this key evidence in part by ignoring and disparaging
the Downing Street Memos when they surfaced three years ago.

Among the saddest aspects of this whole affair, at least for those
who have been in the intelligence profession, is that no one within
the U.S. intelligence establishment saw fit to go public and disclose
the deception that was being used to justify a war of aggression.

No one.

The only seasoned officials with the courage to speak out were
three Foreign Service Officers Brady Kiesling, Ann Wright and
John H. Brown each of whom resigned before the war since it
was clear to them, even without access to the most sensitive
intelligence, that the war could not be justified.

As for intelligence officials outside the United States, there were
several profiles in courage.




20
Katharine Gun, a translator in the British equivalent of our National
Security Agency, did successfully leak a very damaging Jan. 31, 2003,
memorandum from NSA revealing that the U.S. and U.K. were
pulling out all stops to sell the war, even intercepting messages to
UN delegations in New York and elsewhere.

It was all part of a last-ditch attempt to pressure non-aligned
members of the UN Security Council into acquiescing to the
U.S./U.K. desire to strike Iraq.

Gun thought she might succeed in slowing or even stopping an
attack on Iraq, if the world learned the lengths to which Bush and
Blair were going to have their war.

Guns explosive document, carried by the London Observer on
March 2, 2003 just two and a half weeks before the attack on Iraq
was suppressed or trivialized by the FCM (fawning corporate
media) in the United States.



(Gun, who acknowledged leaking the document, was fired and
charged under the Official Secrets Act. But the case collapsed when
the British government balked at providing evidence that might
have disclosed some government law experts had concluded that
the Iraq invasion was illegal. Gun is now a member of VIPS/West.)

21
And after the war began, Danish Army Intelligence Major Frank
Grevil gave the Danish media documents showing that Danish
intelligence had reported to its government that the U.S. public
rationale for war was not supported by authentic intelligence.
Grevil (another VIPS member) was sentenced to four months in
prison for his efforts to tell the truth.

Chapter 7

Andrew Wilkie Rising to the Challenge

Until he quit nine days before the attack on Iraq, Andrew Wilkie
was a senior analyst in Australias premier intelligence agency, the
Office of National Assessments (ONA).

Of all the Australian, British and American all-source intelligence
analysts with direct knowledge of how intelligence was abused in
the run-up to the war Wilkie was the only one to resign in protest
and speak truth to power.

Those who dismiss such efforts as an exercise in futility should
know that on Oct. 7, 2003, the Australian Senate, in a rare move,
censured then-Prime Minister Howard for misleading the public in
justifying sending Australian troops off to war.

The Senate statement of censure noted that Howard had produced
no evidence to justify his claims in March 2003 that Iraq had
stockpiles of biological and chemical weapons, and castigated him
for suppressing Australian intelligence warnings that war with Iraq
would increase the likelihood of terrorist attacks.

One senator accused Howard of unprecedented deceit.

Ask the American FCM why they ignored that story.





22
Thanks to Wilkies courage and determination , many Australians
were able to come to an early understanding that the reasons
adduced for war on Iraq were cooked in Washington and served up
by Australian leaders all too willing to give unquestioning support
to the Bush administration.

Those Australian leaders are now being held accountable.

VIPS invited Andrew Wilkie to Washington in July 2003 to speak at a
briefing arranged by Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, in the House Rayburn
Building.

There were 14 TV cameras in that room, but not one minute of TV
coverage that afternoon or evening.

After his presentation, we strongly encouraged Wilkie to keep
throwing light on this dark chapter of history; he was pleased to
join VIPS/East.

We expressed our hope that U.S. intelligence analysts who also
watched the deceit close-up would soon join him in speaking out.

With a wan smile, Wilkie shook his head and pointed to the cost
including the character assassination to which he had already been
subjected at the hands of his government.

One VIPS Testifies

On Aug. 22, 2003, Wilkie had an opportunity not yet afforded any
VIPS of the American, British or Danish chapters.

He laid out his case before parliament in Canberra, testifying that
the attack on Iraq had little to do with WMD or terrorism. One
particularly telling part of his testimony:

Please remember the Government was also receiving detailed
assessments on the U.S. in which it was made very clear the U.S. was
intent on invading Iraq for more important reasons than WMD and
terrorism.


23
Hence all this talk about WMD and terrorism
was hollow.

Much more likely is the proposition the Government deliberately
exaggerated the Iraq WMD threat so as to stay in step with the U.S.

In the wake of Wilkies testimony, Australian pundits became more
critical of the Howard government and its persistent refusal to
acknowledge that, as one journalist put it, they were conned by
master manipulators masquerading as purveyors of objective
intelligence.

Sounds a little like Scott McClellan, no?

But, thanks to the FCM, most Americans hear it for the first time
only five years later.

The candor of Wilkies Aug. 22, 2003 testimony to the Australian
parliament helps to dispel the myths and canards still wafting
around about among other things how the entire world
believed Saddam Hussein was a dangerous threat.

Accordingly, we include some of the more telling Wilkie excerpts
below.

Opening Remarks to the Parliamentary Joint Committee on the
Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO), the Australian
Secret Intelligence Service (ASIS), and the Defence Signals
Directorate (DSD) 22 August 2003 Andrew Wilkie - Mr. Chairman,
thank you for inviting me to appear before the Committee.

You would be well aware that I resigned from the Office of National
Assessments, before the Iraq war, because I assessed that invading
Iraq would not be the most sensible and ethical way to resolve the
Iraq issue.

I chose resignation, specifically, because compromise or seeking to
create change from within ONA were not realistic options.

24
At the time I resigned I put on the public record three fundamental
concerns.

Firstly, that Iraq did not pose a serious enough security threat to
justify a war.

Secondly, that too many things could go wrong.

And, thirdly, that war was still totally unnecessary because options
short of war were yet to be exhausted.

My first concern is especially relevant today.

It was based on my assessment that Iraqs conventional armed
forces were weak, that Iraqs Weapons of Mass Destruction
programme was disjointed and contained, and that there was no
hard evidence of any active cooperation between Iraq and al
Qaida.

Now the government has claimed repeatedly I was not close
enough to the Iraq issue to know what Im talking about.

Such statements have misled the public and have been
exceptionally hurtful to me.

I was a Senior Analyst with a top secret positive vet security
clearance.

Id been awarded a Superior rating in my last performance
appraisal, and not long before I resigned Id been informed by the
Deputy Director-General that thought was being given to my being
promoted.

Because of my military background (I had been a regular army
infantry Lieutenant Colonel), I was required to be familiar with war-
related issuesand was on standby to cover Iraq once the war
beganNow, in fairness to Australian and Allied intelligence
agencies, Iraq was a tough target.



25
From time to time there were shortages of human intelligence on
the country.

At other times the preponderance of anti-Saddam sources
desperate for US intervention ensured a flood of disinformation.
Collecting technical intelligence was equally challenging.

A problem for Australian agencies was their reliance on Allies.

We had virtually no influence on foreign intelligence collection
planning, and the raw intelligence seldom arrived with adequate
notes on sources or reliability.

More problematic was the way in which Australias tiny agencies
needed to rely on the sometimes weak and skewed views
contained in the assessments prepared in Washington.
A few problems were inevitable.

For instance, intelligence gaps were sometimes back-filled with the
disinformation.

Worst-case sometimes took primacy over most-likely.

The threat was sometimes overestimated as a result of the fairy
tales coming out of the US.

And sometimes Government pressure, as well as politically correct
intelligence officers themselves, resulted in its own bias.

But, overall, Australian agencies did, I believe, an acceptable job
reporting on the existence of, the capacity and willingness to use,
and immediacy of the threat, posed by Iraq.

Assessments were okay, not least because they were always heavily
qualified to reflect the ambiguous intelligence picture.

How then to explain the big gap between the Governments pre-
war claims about Iraq possessing a massive arsenal of WMD and
cooperating actively with al Qaida and the reality that no arsenal of
weapons or evidence of substantive links have yet been found?

26
Well, most often the Government deliberately skewed the truth by
taking the ambiguity out of the issue.

Key intelligence assessment qualifications like probably, could
and uncorroborated evidence suggests were frequently dropped.

Much more useful words like massive and mammoth were
included, even though such words had not been offered to the
government by the intelligence agencies.

Before we knew it, the Government had created a mythical Iraq,
one where every factory was up to no good and weaponisation
was continuing apace.
Equally misleading was the way in which the Government
misrepresented the truth.

For example, when the Government spoke of Iraq having form
(being up to no good), it cited pre-1991 Gulf War examples, like the
use of chemical weapons against Iran and the Kurds.

Mind you, the Government needed to be creative, because 12 years
of sanctions, inspections and air strikes had virtually disarmed
modern Iraq.

The Government even went so far as to
fabricate the truth.

The claims about Iraq cooperating actively with al Qaida were
obviously nonsense.

As was the Governments reference to Iraq seeking uranium in
Africa, despite the fact that ONA, the Department of Defence, and
the Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade, all knew the Niger
story was fraudulent.

This was critical information.




27
It beggars belief that ONA knew it was discredited but didnt advise
the Prime Minister, Defence knew but didnt tell the Defence
Minister, and Foreign Affairs knew but didnt tell the Foreign
Minister.

In closing, I wish to make it clear that I do not apologise for, or
withdraw from, my accusation that the Howard government
misled the Australian public over Iraq, both through its own public
statements, as well as through its endorsement of Allied
statements.

The government lied every time it said or implied that I was not
senior enough or appropriately placed in ONA to know what I was
talking about.

And the government lied every time it skewed, misrepresented,
used selectively and fabricated the Iraq story.

But these examples are just the tip of the iceberg.

For instance, the government lied when the Prime Ministers Office
told the media I was mentally unstable.

The government lied when it associated Iraq with the Bali
bombing.

And the government lied every time it linked Iraq to the War on
Terror.

The Prime Minister and the Foreign Minister in particular have a lot
to answer for.

After all, they were the chief cheerleaders for the invasion of
another country, without UN endorsement, for reasons that have
now been discredited.





28
Conclusion

So as you can see there was an American planned agenda to invade
Iraq before George Bush Dick Cheney was elected, plans were
being worked on to invade.

It had nothing to do with evil Sadam Hussein, bringing Freedom &
Democracy to Iraq.

It was all about OIL, taking control of Iraqs Oil sector, in which they
did, they then broke up the State Government control system
and sold it off to the Corporations.

With Halliburton, Dick Cheney old company handling all the Oil
contracts in selling them off to corporations.

So in other words, all our military personnel were used as
mercenaries to invade somebody else country and steal their assets
namely OIL.

And who has profited?

The Oil Companies.

Halliburton Dick Cheney old company and they all had shares in
Halliburton.

This is not only a crime against the people of Iraq for the damage,
killing our armies have done, but its a crime against our own
military personnel to be used like that.

Our military are there for defensive purposes not to be used as a
standing army to go around fighting wars based upon invading
other countries for the corporations.





29
The Project for the New American Century.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1665.htm

America's War for Global Domination

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article5428.htm

The Plan is for the United States to rule the world.

http://www.informationclearinghouse.info/article1544.htm

I hope you have enjoyed reading The OzBoy File Truth About
Iraq, as you can see I made the case and proved beyond doubt the
invasion of Iraq was corruption at the highest levels of Government
and with politicians.

Australias dear close friend United States of America has turned
into an Fascist Nazi Police State serving the interest of the
corporations and secret groups with an agenda.

It is no longer a system that serves the people, it purely serve the
corporations interest.

Both political parties have sold out and congressmen and senators
collect bribes off the highest bidders from lobbyist who push an
agenda.

Australian stupid and corrupt politicians have signed onto the
bottom line, using our military for the corporations sole greed of
grabbing what ever resources in the world they demand politicians
claim steal on their behalf.

This is absolutely criminal and corruption.





30


We are asking people if they can donate something to keep
Freedom Collective alive and producing more

Great Books
Videos
Web Sites
Stories & Articles

Here is our Banking details.

Bank Account Details
Name On Account: Freedom Collective
BSB: 013516
Account No: 479225403
Bank Swift Code: ANZBAU3M
Bank: ANZ Banking Corporation
927 Sturt Street
Ballarat Victoria 3350 Australia
Please just give the above details to your Bank Teller It cost $25.00
to transfer wire / deposit money straight into our account from
overseas.
And 0 Amount to Transfer / Pay Anybody from your Bank Account
in Australia & to deposit money into our Account at any ANZ Bank.

And thank you to everybody who donates!







31

Some Great Web Sites To Visit and Read
http://southeastasianews.org

http://how911wasdone.com

http://binladden.blogspot.com/

http://itwasntmuslims.blogspot.com/

http://ozradiationnews.blogspot.com

http://www.alqaedadoesntexist.com/

Support The OzBoy Files
Buy a T-shirt, Cap, Jacket, Camera today

http://www.cafepress.com.au/OzboyFiles



http://www.cafepress.com.au/OzboyFiles




32



http://www.cafepress.com.au/OzboyFiles

Вам также может понравиться