gender, and exercise on cardiovascular health measurements such as pulse rate and blood pressure Angela Battaglia TA: Hongchen Cai Section: 001H 4/9/2014
1
Introduction The heart is an essential organ responsible for pumping blood throughout the body, and it is separated into chambers and valves. The atria are the upper chambers and are responsible for pumping blood that returns from the body into the lower chambers, the ventricles (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). The ventricles then pump blood back out into the rest of the body (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). The right side of the heart uses the pulmonary circuit to pump blood and transfer gases to it in the lungs, while the left side of the heart uses the systematic circuit to pump blood and exchange gases with other bodily tissues (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). When blood travels through the heart it is coming from blood vessels called veins and first enters the right atrium. It then goes through the atrioventricular valve into the right ventricle and then leaves eventually ending up in the lungs where gas exchange occurs (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). Blood then returns to the heart and into the left ventricle, and then is pushed out of the body through the semiaortic valve into the arteries. The two heart sounds we normally hear go along with the closing of heart valves (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). The first sound, the lub, goes along with valve contraction, and the sound, the dub with valve relaxation (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). There are a few different measures of cardiovascular health such as blood pressure and pulse count. As a general rule, lower values for both of these measures are indicatory of good cardiovascular health. Blood pressure, in particular, is contributable to two main factors: cardiac output and peripheral resistance Cardiac output is defined as the amount of blood going into the ventricle per a certain unit of time (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). Both the rate at which the heart beats and how much blood each beat contains 2
factors into the cardiac output, and it increases significantly during exercise (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). Peripheral resistance which is the resistance from the surrounding blood vessels for blood to flow out of the heart that prevents the blood pressure in the heart from bottoming out between beats (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). Blood pressure fluctuates with heart beats with its lowest point named the diastole and its peak the systole, and both the systolic and diastolic blood pressures are needed for a blood pressure measurement (Nelson & Burpee, 2014). As previously stated, blood pressure and pulse count are main measures of cardiovascular health, and there are many factors that can contribute to an individuals cardiovascular health such as exercise, gender, and weight. Exercise has been found repeatedly to increase cardiac health demonstrated by its ability to decrease the risk of dying from heart diseases such as coronary heart disease (Paffenbarger et. al., 1993). In addition to this, lack of exercise is a significant risk factor for obtaining heart disease; it is considered one of the five major risk factors (Myers, 2003) (Luepker et. al., 1996). Weight has also been identified as a factor in cardiac health. Males have been shown to generally have lower heart health as determined by an increased risk of coronary heart disease (Barrett-Connor, 1997). Although females do experience some later life events such as menopause and pregnancy that can be factors in decreasing heart health(Parikh, 2011), they still generally perform better on tests of coronary risk factors than men(Smelser & Bates,2001). Weight also contributes to heart health, again as judged by an increased risk of heart disease. As BMI, which is strongly related to weight, increases, so does a persons relative risk to contract heart disease (Manson et. al., 1995). Healthy body weight along with other healthy lifestyle choices has also been found to decrease 3
heart disease risk factors (Hu, 2005). The goals of this experiment are to obtain data about different individuals cardiac health and their physiology and analyze this data before and during exercise and also to evaluate what factors are important in cardiovascular fitness through connecting the cardiovascular data with personal histories. Many different attributes of personal history were obtained from the individuals, but weight, gender, and amount of exercise were the factors chosen for analysis. The main question here is what role these factors play in cardiovascular health as determined by data such as blood pressure and pulse count. Due to the preexisting data, I hypothesize that cardiovascular health will be increased, meaning that pulse count and blood pressure during exercise will not be as significantly elevated as compared to at rest and will lower when at rest, as weight decreases, amount of exercise increases, as well as in the female gender.
Materials and Methods This experiment requires only relatively basic exercise equipment and cardiovascular measuring tools. A 33 cm or 40 cm tall step was used as the exercise equipment depending on whether the individual was less than 5 6 or equal to or taller than 5 6 respectively. A standard sphygmomanometer and stethoscope were used to take blood measure readings, and pulse counts were recorded by a pulse counter using a stopwatch to keep time. A stopwatch and metronome were also used to keep time and pace respectively during the stepping exercise. (Nelson & Burpee, 2014) First, all recorders of cardiovascular data were trained on how to properly operate the sphygmomanometer and use it in combination with a stethoscope to record blood 4
pressures. The sphygmomanometer consists of a bulb which is used to inflate the inflatable cuff and a pressure gauge where blood pressure can be measured. The stethoscope is placed on the brachial artery and the cuff is wrapped around the individuals bare arm. The valve on the bulb is closed, but not too tightly and then the cuff was inflated to around 175 mm Hg. The cuff is then slowly deflated. Systolic pressure is recorded when the first faint thumping is heard through the stethoscope, and when sound is no longer heard through the stethoscope diastolic pressure is recorded. Pulse counts are recorded on the wrist or on the neck by the trachea. (Nelson & Burpee, 2014) Personal history data was then obtained from all individuals in the background data table. Then the first set of cardiovascular data was collected. Each set of cardiovascular data consisted of a 30-second pulse count as well as a blood pressure recording broken down into systolic and diastolic blood pressures. Both measurements were only recorded once for each set of data and it was all recorded in the background data table as well. The first set of data was the resting data set recorded before any exercise was done. (Nelson & Burpee, 2014) Individuals then completed the first step exercise which was a four count activity starting with an individual standing on the ground in front of the step. The four counts were (1) step onto the step with one leg, (2) step onto the step with the other leg so that both feet are on the step, 3) step down from the step with one leg, and (4) step down from the step with the other leg so that both feet are on the ground again and together all 4 counts constitute a step. The first step exercise consisted was 60 counts per minute or 15 steps per minute. This was done for one minute, and then the individual was instructed to 5
sit for 15 seconds before the next set of cardiovascular data was obtained and recorded in Table 1. The individual was allowed to recover and then a second step exercise was performed, but this time at 120 counts per minute or 30 steps per minute. The last set of cardiovascular data is then obtained and recorded fifteen seconds after the individual completes this step exercise. All of the cardiovascular measurements, step exercises, and personal history recordings were repeated for every participant. (Nelson & Burpee, 2014) Data analysis was then done on the data collected for each of the three categories to be analyzed: gender, exercise, and weight. First each data set was divided into two groups. For weight the groups were <150 pounds and >=150 pounds, for exercise the groups were <4 hours per week and >=4 hours per week, and for gender the groups were male and female. Percent differences were calculated as the change in heart rate after each step exercise normalized by the resting hear rate using the following formula: ([Exercise Value- Resting Value]/Resting Value) Averages were also calculated for each of the six groups (3 different factors with two groups each) for each section of cardiovascular data using the standard average formula (Sum of data/ total number of data entries). Standard errors were also calculated for every all the cardiovascular data from all 6 groups using a standard error formula (standard deviation of the data set/ square root of the number of data entries in that set). A T-Test was then done in order to get a p value to determine if there was any significant difference between the two data groups being analyzed for each of the 3 analyses using a two tailed distribution and two- sample unequal variance. (Nelson & Burpee, 2014)
Results 6
Exercise Analysis
Table 3: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in systolic BP after exercise for the exercise factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Sys.BP <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise p value 15-steps 0.091199776 0.079443508 0.011122008 0.008190465 0.395669 30-steps 0.172931298 0.188717543 0.014267454 0.012958856 0.413616
Table 4: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in diastolic BP after exercise for the exercise factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Dias.BP <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise p value 15-steps 0.049977848 0.059797934 0.016215691 0.015323972 0.66024 30-steps 0.092784191 0.090492469 0.014409618 0.018267968 0.921625
Figure 1: Average Resting Values for Pulse Count, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Diastolic Blood Pressure for both the <4 hours per week of exercise and >= 4 hours per week of exercise groups in the exercise factor analysis with standard errors given by error bars. The difference between the average pulse count data from each group is significant according to the T-test. Figure 2: Average change in 30 second pulse counts normalized by the resting values for both the <4 hours per week exercise and >= 4 hours of exercise per week groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the exercise factor analysis with standard error given by error bars *** Table 1: Average, Standard Error, and T-test values for Pulse count, Systolic BP, and Diastolic Bp at resting level values for the exercise factor analysis Average Standard Error T-test <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise p value Pulse count 38.50339286 36.91600806 0.569378267 0.455371239 0.030536 Sys.BP 119.0178571 119.3064516 1.203610382 0.813614921 0.842743 Dias.BP 74.40178571 74.78225806 0.803032763 0.847201196 0.744761
Table 2: Normalized average change, Standard Error, and T-Test values in pulse count/30sec after exercise for the exercise factor analysis Pulse count av. % diff Standard Error T-test <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise <4 hours exercise >=4 hours exercise p value 15-steps 0.226571979 0.223199598 0.019813173 0.022873362 0.911362 30-steps 0.522199096 0.517118211 0.02496082 0.022215689 0.87928
7
For the exercise factor, the only data that contains a significant difference between the <4 hours of exercise per week group and >=4 hours per week group is the resting 30 second pulse count shown both in Table 1 and in Figure 1. In this data set, the >=4 hours per week of exercise group was shown to have a lower value for pulse count of approximately 37 as compared to the >4 hours group that displayed an average pulse value of approximately 39. The data displayed in Figure 2, Figure 3, and Figure 4, and in Table 2, Table 3, and Table 4 as well as the Systolic and Diastolic BP data from Table 1 and Figure 1 contained no significant differences between the two groups, and no clear trends were visible.
Figure 3: Average change in systolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the <4 hours per week exercise and >= 4 hours of exercise per week groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the exercise factor analysis with standard error given by error bars Figure 4: Average change in diastolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the <4 hours per week exercise and >= 4 hours of exercise per week groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the exercise factor analysis with standard error given by error bars 8
Gender Factor
Table 5: Average, Standard Error, and T-test values for Pulse count, Systolic BP, and Diastolic Bp at resting level values for the gender factor analysis Average Standard Error T-test Females Males Females p value Pulse count 37.74675 37.56765 0.462503 0.585131 0.810462 Sys.BP 117.4627 121.4118 0.929911 1.070088 0.005816 Dias.BP 73.39552 76.18627 0.783271 0.858198 0.017133 Table 6: Normalized average change, Standard Error, and T-Test values in pulse count/30sec after exercise for the gender factor analysis Pulse count av. % diff Standard Error T-test Females Males Females Males p value 15-steps 0.214859 0.23786 0.017555 0.026688 0.472415 30-steps 0.526571 0.510278 0.022401 0.024761 0.626063 Table 7: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in systolic BP after exercise for the gender factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Sys.BP Females Males Females Males p value 15-steps 0.077473 0.094941 0.008931 0.010473 0.205789 30-steps 0.175011 0.18939 0.01257 0.014872 0.461094 Table 8: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in diastolic BP after exercise for the gender factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Dias.BP Females Males Females Males p value 15-steps 0.0536 0.057158 0.016067 0.014794 0.870723 30-steps 0.08876 0.095285 0.014696 0.019256 0.787894 Figure 5: Average Resting Values for Pulse Count, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Diastolic Blood Pressure for both the male and female groups in the gender factor analysis with standard errors given by error bars. The differences between the two groups for both the Systolic and diastolic BP averages are significant according to the T-Test Figure 6: Average change in 30 second pulse counts normalized by the resting values for both the male and female groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the gender factor analysis with standard error given by error bars *** *** 9
For the gender factor, the only data sets that contain a significant difference between the female group and the male group are the resting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressures shown both in Table 5 and in Figure 5. For the Diastolic BP, the female group was shown to have a lower average value of approximately 73 as compared to the male group that displayed an average value of approximately 76. For the Systolic BP, the female group was again shown to have a lower average value of approximately 117 as compared to the male group that displayed an average value of approximately 121. The data displayed in Figure 6, Figure 7, and Figure 8, and in Table 6, Table 7, and Table 8 as well as the average Pulse Count Data from Table 5 and Figure 5 contained no significant differences between the two groups. However a slight trend of males having higher in data in almost every table and figure can be seen, but it is often considered insignificant due to high standard errors. Figure 7: Average change in systolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the male and female groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the gender factor analysis with standard error given by error bars Figure 8: Average change in diastolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the male and female groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the gender factor analysis with standard error given by error bars 10
Weight factor
Table 9: Average, Standard Error, and T-test values for Pulse count, Systolic BP, and Diastolic Bp at resting level values for the weight factor analysis
Average Standard Error T-test <150 pounds >=150 pounds <150 pounds >=150 pounds p value Pulse count 37.94035156 37.34814815 0.505708 0.523212 0.416574 Sys.BP 117.2734375 121.4166667 1.035701 0.914682 0.003007 Dias.BP 73.21875 76.24074074 0.78596 0.852365 0.009752 Table 10: Normalized average change, Standard Error, and T-Test values in pulse count/30sec after exercise for the weight factor analysis Pulse count av. % diff Standard Error T-test <150 pounds >=150 pounds <150 pounds >=150 pounds p value 15-steps 0.199223846 0.255112588 0.017041 0.026241 0.075671 30-steps 0.499716724 0.543011261 0.022391 0.024638 0.194774 Table 11: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in systolic BP after exercise for the weight factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Sys.BP <150 pounds >=150 pounds <150 pounds >=150 pounds p value 15-steps 0.073721064 0.098417349 0.009024 0.010232 0.071592 30-steps 0.164937214 0.200530716 0.013415 0.013502 0.06274 Table 12: Normalized average change , Standard Error, and T-Test values in diastolic BP after exercise for the weight factor analysis av. % diff Standard Error T-test Dias.BP <150 pounds >=150 pounds <150 pounds >=150 pounds p value 15-steps 0.043701226 0.06869172 0.015056 0.01647 0.263934 30-steps 0.078418956 0.107178419 0.01443 0.019151 0.231755 11
Figure 9: Average Resting Values for Pulse Count, Systolic Blood Pressure, and Diastolic Blood Pressure for both the <150 pounds and>=150 pounds groups in the weight factor analysis with standard errors given by error bars. The difference between the two groups for both the Systolic and Diastolic BP averages was considered significant by the T-Test. Figure 10: Average change in 30 second pulse counts normalized by the resting values for both the <150 pounds and >= 150 pounds groups for both the 15- steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the weight factor analysis with standard error given by error bars Figure 11: Average change in systolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the <150 pounds and >= 150 pounds groups for both the 15- steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the weight factor analysis with standard error given by error bars Figure 12: Average change in diastolic blood pressure normalized by the resting values for both the <150 pounds and >= 150 pounds groups for both the 15-steps per minute and 30-steps per minute exercises in the weight factor analysis with standard error given by error bars *** *** 12
For the weight factor, the only data sets that contain a significant difference between the <150 pounds group and the >=150 pounds are the resting Diastolic and Systolic Blood Pressures shown both in Table 9 and in Figure 9. For the Diastolic BP, the <150 pounds group was shown to have a lower average value of approximately 73 as compared to the >=150 pounds group that displayed an average value of approximately 76. For the Systolic BP, the <150 pounds group was again shown to have a lower average value of approximately 117 as compared to the >=150 pounds group that displayed an average value of approximately 121. The data displayed in Figure 10, Figure 11, and Figure 12, and in Table 10, Table 11, and Table 12 as well as the average Pulse Count Data from Table 9 and Figure 9 contained no significant differences between the two groups. However a slight trend of the >=150 pound group having higher in data in almost every table and figure can be seen, but it is often considered insignificant due to high standard errors.
Discussion
All of the initial hypotheses were supported by the data that was found to be significant, but there was not significant data to support some aspects of the hypothesis. In the gender group females had lower resting blood pressures, a sign of positive cardiovascular health, as shown in Figure 5 and Table 5 which supports that facet of the initial hypothesis as well as preexisting literature on the topic. (Barrett-Connor, 1997) (Parikh, 2011) (Smelser & Bates,2001) In the weight group, those in the <150 pounds group also had lower resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures, as shown in Table 9 13
and Figure 9, which again is a sign of goof cardiovascular health, thus also supporting the initial hypothesis and the preexisting literature on the topic. (Manson et. al., 1995) (Hu, 2005) In the exercise group, those who exercised >=4 hours per week were shown to have significantly lower pulse count, as shown in Table 1 and Figure 1 which is also a sign of positive cardiovascular health, and thus this part of the hypothesis was also supported by this experiment and also supports preexisting literature. (Paffenbarger et. al., 1993) (Myers, 2003) (Luepker et. al., 1996) However, with all of these conclusions and trends it must be said that only one or two data sets for each factor proved to be significant and they were all at resting levels. This leads to the conclusion that the goals of this experiment, to obtain data about different individuals cardiac health and their physiology and analyze this data before and during exercise and also to evaluate what factors are important in cardiovascular fitness through connecting the cardiovascular data with personal histories, were only partially fulfilled. Data collection and analysis was done, but none of the exercise data ended up being significant and useful data, so the connections drawn back to the cardiovascular health of the groups cannot be made with much confidence. There were a few other data trends mentioned in the references section but none contained enough significant data to be considered significant. Once source of error in this experiment that couldve caused the lack of significant data is the fact that all individuals were relatively young, between the ages of 18 and 27, and younger people in general tend to have healthier hearts and their bad cardiovascular habits have probably not had time to catch up with them yet to the extent that they would be reflected in measures of their cardiovascular health. Doing this 14
experiment with an older group of individuals may be beneficial in solving this problem. Also, individuals couldve been dishonest about any aspects of their personal history which would cause an error and not allow for significant data. Measuring data wherever possible, such as weighing people and taking their heights, could help to ensure more accurate personal histories. Another possible source of error could also be that the exercise done was not vigorous enough to provoke a significant change in any measures of cardiovascular health. This could potentially be fixed by making the step exercises last for longer. An additional source of error could have also stemmed from inaccurate blood pressure recordings stemming from the fact that it was very loud when the blood pressures were being taken and thus the soft heart sounds were often difficult to make out. This could be fixed by taking the blood pressures in a separate quiet room, or by doing trials on different individuals one at a time instead of at the same time. The relevance of this data is that it, like many other studies of its kind, show what factors contribute to good cardiovascular health and thus it can help to educate the general population on what to do to keep their hearts healthy. Going forward, doing more of these studied and applying the changes suggested in the previous paragraph would provide even more useful data on the subject. The question as to whether or not stress is significant factor in cardiovascular disease would also be interesting to test and could be incorporated into further experiments as well in order to ensure that everyone in the population can know what habits are best in order to have a healthy cardiovascular system. 15
References Cardiovascular Physiology: The Relationship between Gas Exchange and Cardiac Activity. Edited by Nelson, K. and Burpee, D. Department of Biology, The Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA. (2014) Barrett-Connor, E. (1997). Sex Differences in Coronary Heart Disease. Circulation, 95, 252-264. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/95/1/252.full Luepker, R., J ohnson, S. B., Breslow, L., Chobanian, A., & Davis, C. (1996). Physical activity and cardiovascular health. NIH Consensus Development Panel on Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 276(3), 241-246. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://jama.jamanetwork.com/data/J ournals/J AMA/9768/jama_276_3_036.pdf Manson, J ., Willett, W., Stampfer, M., Colditz, G., Hunter, D., Hankinson, S., et al. (1995). Body Weight and Mortality among Women. New England Journal of Medicine, 333(11), 677-685. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.nejm.org/doi/pdf/10.1056/NEJ M199509143331101 Myers, J . (2003). Exercise and Cardiovascular Health. Circulation: Journal of the American Heart Association, 107, e2-e5. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://circ.ahajournals.org/content/107/1/e2.full.pdf Paffenbarger, R. S., Hyde, R. T., Wing, A. L., Lee, I., J ung, D. L., & Kampert, J . B. (1993). The Association of Changes in Physical-Activity Level and Other Lifestyle Characteristics with Mortality among Men. New England Journal of Medicine, 328(8), 538-545. 16
Parikh, N. I. (2011). Sex differences in the risk of cardiovascular disease. BMJ, 343, d5526-d5526. Retrieved April 11, 2014, from http://www.bmj.com/content/343/bmj.d5526.pdf%2Bhtml Smelser, N. J ., & Baltes, P. B. (2001). Gender and Cardiovascular Health. International encyclopedia of the social & behavioral sciences (pp. 5904-5907). Amsterdam: Elsevier.