Grace Thyme V New Zealand Family Court A documented account

Commissioned by Paula Timpany, Barrister Copy Right Holder

RICHARD P. WOLFF, PhD January 2013

Table of Contents
Introduction.. Background; 1999 2003.. Domestic Violence New Zealands response to Domestic Violence.. Background; 2003-2012.. Child abduction by New Zealand entities The removal of the child; 24 November 2012. The Ransom. The Negotiation The Lawyer The final consent order January 2013 The environment; February 2013... The environment; March 2013. The environment; April 2013. Parental Alienation in New Zealand. Parental Alienation of the child. The New Zealand Family Court.. Family Law New Zealand....................... Family Court Lawyers. Counsel for Child... Court report writers. Family Court Judges... Court Staff Mental Health of the Judiciary Psychological evaluation of Judges The Family Court Applications. Fathers Mental Health issues.. Fathers Domestic Violence Fathers Family Violence against children.. Impact on the child Impact on the mother.. Principal Family Court Judge...

Thyme v New Zealand Family Court

Abuse of process and power.. Judges endangering children.. The Law....... Psychological abuse ..... Emotional abuse....... Court Documents and Process.. Common law....... Parental right breaches in New Zealand... Child abuse- government entities of New Zealand........... International Experts reactions to this report.. Conclusion.......

Thyme v New Zealand Family Court

The report refers to the communication filed with the United Nations Human Rights Council.

The document refers to a public documentation of the events of the report.

This document remains the property of the writer until such a time as the report has been accepted by the United Nations Human Rights Council as a formal communication. This document cannot be released to the public, until the state responds to the contents of the communication. In accordance with the view to enhance cooperation with the state concerned under United Nations protocol.

The document and report have been completed with the assistance of some of the most renowned experts in the fields of Child Psychology, Behavioural Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Psychiatrists, Doctors of Law, Professors, Social Work, Child advocates, Frontline workers in Domestic Violence and retired Judges.

The need to report to the United Nations Human Rights Council, was born out of consistent patterns of gross and reliably attested violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms occurring within the New Zealand Family Court. The writer has maintained a formal procedure to be impartial, objective, efficient and responsible.

This document has no political ties, has been written in good faith and is applicable to the field of Human Rights. Factual descriptions of

violations and the rights that have been violated are given with consistent and clear evidence.

Thyme v New Zealand Family Court