Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
A Paper
Submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for
NU304 Evidence Based Practice
University of South Alabama
College of Nursing
Fall 2009
RUNNING HEAD: A RESEARCH CRITIQUE 2
protection of human participants by stating that substitute initials will be used whenever they are
quoted (Mitchell, & Hall, 2009). The saturation of data was not clearly described in the article,
but the article did state that selective coding caused the sorting of saturated data into themes that
described the women’s healing process (Mitchell, & Hall, 2009).
Instrumentation and Data Analysis
The researcher described the strategies used to analyze the data as a systematic analysis,
which resulted in a theoretical process that stated that women are pushed into a psychological
process that is like entering a labyrinth when they are told that they have an abnormal Pap smear
(Mitchell, & Hall, 2009). These strategies are valid and compatible for the purpose of the study
because it is fitting to turn the analysis of a person’s feelings of a negative experience into a
metaphor that people can picture and understand. The researcher’s interpretation of the data is
clear and concise and definitely does not compromise its integrity in any way. It is a good
representation of what these women feel and a good interpretation of the processes that they
must go through in order to feel at peace with themselves again.
The reader clearly understands the procedures used by the researcher to analyze the data.
The researcher does not address the credibility, auditability, and fittingness of the data directly,
but he does state that the labyrinth metaphor became viewed by the participants as an accurate
symbol based on the subjects’ descriptions of their experiences, which included being put onto a
detour from their expected direction of life (Mitchell, & Hall, 2009). As for auditability, the
reader could follow the researcher’s thought process and the researcher did document the
research process. The findings of this study could be applicable outside of the study, and the
results are fitting and meaningful to others outside of the research.
Discussion
The findings of the article clearly spell out what the women in this study were feeling and
the mental processes that they had to go through, and are still going through, to discover how to
accept their test results and have a positive attitude toward themselves. The researcher’s
thoughts and concepts directly reflect the data that the women provided, so much so that they
actually stated that they agreed with them. In the discussion section, the researcher compares the
report to what was known about the phenomenon by discussing the literature review findings
compared with his. The researcher discusses implications for practice in the article clearly and
concisely. He tells the correct way to promote a woman’s ability to get control of her health and
trust the medical professionals’ recommendations for treatment. As a result, the reader
understands the best way to use the findings in practice and what skills are required to correctly
assess a client’s needs. Recommendations for future research are also clearly stated at the end of
the article; he includes quantitative studies that could be used to test interventions to help women
in the different stages of the labyrinth study (Mitchell, & Hall, 2009).
Conclusion
This article was very well-written and well-organized. The reader could find all of the
components of the article easily without having to search through it. The researcher was very
clear with his information collection, data analyzing, and findings. He also made it clear who
would benefit the most from knowing this information, and he also made it clear the best way to
apply the information in clinical practice. The reader would definitely recommend this article to
a person looking for a clear, concise, and well-organized qualitative article.
References
RUNNING HEAD: A RESEARCH CRITIQUE 4
Boswell, C., & Cannon, S. (2007). Introduction to nursing research: incorporating evidence-
Mitchell, S., & Hall, V.P. (2009). Women's initial experience of abnormal papanicolaou smear.