0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
19 просмотров1 страница
Abstract. Global Warming Potential (GWP) equivalents are typically used in life cycle assessment to represent radiative forcing over time. This practice works well when all GHG emissions take place within a short period and do not vary over time. However, results using CO₂ equivalents to represent radiative forcing may be inaccurate if emissions do not fit within a small time horizon or if the magnitude of emissions from a system changes over time. In these cases, emissions that are modeled as a single pulse at t=0 and reported in carbon dioxide equivalents may inaccurately represent the magnitude of radiative forcing from the system over a period of time. This is especially important when comparing systems that do not have a similar pattern of GHG emissions over time.
Abstract. Global Warming Potential (GWP) equivalents are typically used in life cycle assessment to represent radiative forcing over time. This practice works well when all GHG emissions take place within a short period and do not vary over time. However, results using CO₂ equivalents to represent radiative forcing may be inaccurate if emissions do not fit within a small time horizon or if the magnitude of emissions from a system changes over time. In these cases, emissions that are modeled as a single pulse at t=0 and reported in carbon dioxide equivalents may inaccurately represent the magnitude of radiative forcing from the system over a period of time. This is especially important when comparing systems that do not have a similar pattern of GHG emissions over time.
Abstract. Global Warming Potential (GWP) equivalents are typically used in life cycle assessment to represent radiative forcing over time. This practice works well when all GHG emissions take place within a short period and do not vary over time. However, results using CO₂ equivalents to represent radiative forcing may be inaccurate if emissions do not fit within a small time horizon or if the magnitude of emissions from a system changes over time. In these cases, emissions that are modeled as a single pulse at t=0 and reported in carbon dioxide equivalents may inaccurately represent the magnitude of radiative forcing from the system over a period of time. This is especially important when comparing systems that do not have a similar pattern of GHG emissions over time.
If applicable, page number will go here after aggregating all papers
Proceedings of the International Symposium on
Sustainable Systems and Technologies, v2 (2014)
Time series analysis of radiative forcing in a co-fired power system
Greg Schivley Booz Allen Hamilton, Schivley_Greg@bah.com Troy Hawkins EPA, trh@alumni.cmu.edu Tim Skone NETL, Timothy.Skone@netl.doe.gov Joe Marriott Booz Allen Hamilton, Marriott_Joe@bah.com
Abstract. Global Warming Potential (GWP) equivalents are typically used in life cycle assessment to represent radiative forcing over time. This practice works well when all GHG emissions take place within a short period and do not vary over time. However, results using CO equivalents to represent radiative forcing may be inaccurate if emissions do not fit within a small time horizon or if the magnitude of emissions from a system changes over time. In these cases, emissions that are modeled as a single pulse at t=0 and reported in carbon dioxide equivalents may inaccurately represent the magnitude of radiative forcing from the system over a period of time. This is especially important when comparing systems that do not have a similar pattern of GHG emissions over time.
The use of co-fired biomass for energy production has been suggested as a method to reduce GHG emissions. Determining the magnitude of the reduction depends on the metric used. A time series analysis of life cycle emissions is used to determine the cumulative radiative forcing from three systems: coal-only, hybrid poplar co-fired with coal, and long-growth roundwood co- fired with coal. As the length of time between the uptake of carbon dioxide by biomass and its release during combustion increases, the cumulative radiative forcing increasingly departs from the value of zero that would be calculated using standard GWP metrics.
Direct and indirect land use change from the growth of hybrid poplar in the corn belt is used as one example of this time-dependent effect. The total radiative forcing from direct land use change emissions are 34% and 10% lower for 20 and 100 years than would be calculated for a single pulse of emissions at t=0; radiative forcing for indirect land use change is 86% and 33% lower for 20 and 100 years from t=0. Direct land use change is closer to the calculated value because nearly half of the emissions take place in the first year of activity and 84% occur by t=20. In contrast, only 24% of the indirect emissions occur by t=20.
The growth of roundwood provides another example of how standard GWP factors can give inaccurate or misleading results when compared with actual radiative forcing. With harvest cycle times measured in the decades, results calculated from a time series differ if CO uptake is modeled for the growth of harvested wood or the replanted trees. The two choices give very different results, with cumulative radiative forcing 24% higher at t=100 when uptake occurs in replanted trees.