0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
25 просмотров9 страниц
Eric Sheninger advocates a rethought school leadership model for Changing Times. Sheninger believes the 21st century's enhanced ability to connect, communicate, and collaborate is an underutilized tool for modern leadership. The intention of the book is to provide principals, school leaders and teachers the tools and knowledge to put in place what Sheninger calls "the Pillars of digital leadership"
Eric Sheninger advocates a rethought school leadership model for Changing Times. Sheninger believes the 21st century's enhanced ability to connect, communicate, and collaborate is an underutilized tool for modern leadership. The intention of the book is to provide principals, school leaders and teachers the tools and knowledge to put in place what Sheninger calls "the Pillars of digital leadership"
Eric Sheninger advocates a rethought school leadership model for Changing Times. Sheninger believes the 21st century's enhanced ability to connect, communicate, and collaborate is an underutilized tool for modern leadership. The intention of the book is to provide principals, school leaders and teachers the tools and knowledge to put in place what Sheninger calls "the Pillars of digital leadership"
Subject Code and Name: INF530 Concepts and Practices for a Digital Age
Assessment Title: Assessment Item 4 - Scholarly Book Review
Word Count: 1650
Matthew Ives 11540700 1 There is no denying the impact new digital technologies are having on our society. In Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times published by Corwin Press (2014) the author, Eric Sheninger, advocates a rethought school leadership model for these changing times. Sheninger believes the 21st centurys enhanced ability to connect, communicate, and collaborate is an underutilized tool for modern leadership which if successfully harnessed can lead to improved relationships and a stronger school culture.
The intention of the book is to provide principals, school leaders and teachers the tools and knowledge to put into place what Sheninger calls The Pillars of Digital Leadership. These are seven areas (ranging from specific to general) that can be enhanced via the opportunities new digital technologies, in particular social media, enable. The book is not a thorough investigation into leadership - Sheninger states that much of that knowledge, for example the Six Secrets of Change framework (Fullan, 2008, as cited in Sheninger, 2014, p54), currently exists - but rather a reimagining of the principles of effective leadership set amongst the connected, changing world of today (Aungst, 2014).
The why and the how of this leadership model comprises the contents and forms to structure the book. Roughly the first third provides context: the post-industrial world now, explaining why change is complicated but essential. This is proceeded with the bulk of the book, the how - The Seven Pillars of Digital Leadership, each pillar allocated a chapter.
As a self-confessed techno-sceptic turned social media expert (Welborn, 2014), Sheningers journey (along with the school he is currently principal of - New Milford High School in Bergen County, New Jersey) provides much of the evidence for the efficacy of his leadership Matthew Ives 11540700 2 framework. Indeed, this is a strength of the book - it is written by an author in the trenches, a practising principal who has led change successfully, navigating the pitfalls and finding out what works (Johansen, 2014). It also comprises a range of personal vignettes from teachers and principals across the United States, and as such, Digital Leadership rings with an air of (US- centric) authenticity, rather than that of a by-the-numbers, heavily analytical approach.
This review will critically analyse two core issues related to author intention: does the author provide compelling reasons why change leadership is necessary? And, through the lense of social media, are the practical steps the author suggests valid and useful in regards to addressing what therefore needs to occur?
The Why
The premise for Sheningers assertion that we need to rethink leadership in our changing times, is that, in fact, we do actually live in rapidly changing times (Sheninger, 2014, p17). This is a difficult statement to dispute, and one which Sheninger provides evidence for through Pew Internet and American Life Project (2010), Childwise (2013), and mobiThinking (2012) research. As to the veracity of this data, The Pew Internet research Sheninger draws heavily from was compiled from surveys of approximately 800 adolescents and 2 250 adults in late 2009, and is considered an accurate, nonpartisan source of statistical data (Keeter, 2010).
Sheninger posits that of greater importance is that fact these shifts in society have not been mirrored in schools (Sheninger, 2014, p5) - views which a range of reputable educational thinkers confirm. The actual issue then is the fundamental disconnect between students and the Matthew Ives 11540700 3 schools they attend (Kelly, McCain & Jukes, 2009, p9). This disconnect is an often heard lament, with many suggesting that schools are stuck in an industrial age education paradigm (Robinson, 2006). A further exacerbation is the education reform movement focused on mass standardisation and high-stakes testing. Together, these forces act as deep-rooted complicators, generating negative side-effects such as the narrowing of curriculum and reducing of achievement (Berliner, 2011, p288).
The opposition of this industrial age education and standardisation to what we understand as required learning for current times is striking (Moravec, 2013, p44). It is a tension explored by Andy Hargreaves who believes teachers are amidst a crisis of disturbing proportions - being expected to be catalysts of learning in a world filled with opportunity, counterpoints for the perceived threats of this same open world, as well as a casualties in the tug-of-war between increasing educational expectations and mass-standardisation (Hargreaves, 2003, p10).
Sheningers claims as to the state of education, and why change is necessary, are not new - they are well documented and can be seen in schools and heard in staff rooms the world over. In tying all this together, he has been able to hit a nerve with the first section of the book - the why. It provides an effective, widely understood raison d'etre for the existence of his Pillars of Digital Leadership.
The How
The scene is set - so how then do school leaders begin to set in motion the change that needs to occur? Sheninger offers The Seven Pillars of Digital Leadership (communication, public Matthew Ives 11540700 4 relations, branding, professional growth and development, increasing student engagement and enhancing learning, rethinking learning environments and spaces, and discovering opportunity) as the answer, based on his experiences and research.
Sheningers pillars are wide ranging, and to investigate every pillar thoroughly is outside the scope of this review. A possible avenue with which to evaluate the framework is via a theme evident throughout many of the pillars - the effective use of social media. This is also a current issue of professional interest for my own school context therefore investigating the evidence Sheninger uses to back his claims and where it aligns with current theory enables a meaningful porthole into the success (or not) of the authors intentions.
To begin with the successes, it is clear Sheninger values the smart use of social media (Sheninger, 2014, p69). This is a core strength of his pillars for two reasons: social networking is free and readily available, making participation in such networks practical for time and cash strapped leaders, and secondly utilising social networking propagates the kind of polyphonic connections (Niels, 2012) which amplify learning, knowledge and understanding in the 21st century (Siemens, 2004) for both teachers and students. This is evident throughout Sheningers pillars of Communication, Public Relations and Professional Growth and Development.
Sheninger sees social networking as integral to fostering real, multi-directional communication between home, school, and community - a central tenent of his Communication and Public Relations pillars. Strengthening these ties in an ongoing, two-way manner is associated with academic success (Bouffard, 2008) and leveraging social networks in pursuit of this is a logical step. Considering the assertion made previously, that home and school life is growing further and Matthew Ives 11540700 5 further apart, taking steps to bring these two closer together can become a central component of communication efforts. In addition, with the knowledge that 73% of online adults use social networking sites (Pew Internet and American Life Project, 2013) Sheningers assertion that school leaders should become active on these networks is a valid one. In doing so, leaders and teachers can deepen the relationship with their community and increase their ability to connect students with learning agents. By spreading positive stories, social networking can also precipitate a refocus on what a truly quality education for todays students in tomorrows world entails.
A further area that leverages the power of the social network as its evidential basis is the Professional Growth and Development pillar, which focuses on the development of a PLN (Personal Learning Network). PLNs are not new - we have always relied on a network of friends, family, coworkers and acquaintances to enlarge our knowledge of the world (Warlick, 2009, p13). What is new is that digital technologies are giving us the opportunity to extend and organise these connections on a massive scale. As leaders, teachers, and indeed students begin to collaborate and construct knowledge together they enter a community of practice (Alderton, Brunsell & Bariexca, 2011, p354) where people who share a concern or a passion for something they do ... learn how to do it better as they interact regularly (Wenger, 2011, p1). Knowledge, in these environments is fostered and maintained and allows participants to stay up to date in their particular fields (Siemens, 2004). Sheninger asserts that this type of connectedness should be the standard, not just an option.
In the assessment of the pillars above in terms of the related literature, it is clear that they hold some veracity, as when social networks are used to propagate and enhance connections between Matthew Ives 11540700 6 parents, stakeholders, and professionals they can generate powerful learning and powerful change. In contrast to this, Sheningers chapter on Branding seems to differ from this theme. It espouses an almost advertorial, one-way approach to establishing a schools brand presence in order to publicise its culture. It is a concept based upon Sheningers own original ideas, not referenced or backed by any particular educational research. It is a business-based notion (Sheninger, 2014, p106), and one which could be interrogated as to its purpose - to encourage the links and openness that Tim Berners-Lee (2009) suggests is required for the growth of this connected world, or to encourage siloing and protection of the elements that define a schools brand? An interesting concept amidst an otherwise well thought-out framework.
Summary
Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times sets out to provide leaders with a toolkit for effective leadership in the digital world of today. The strength of the book lies in Sheningers ability to cross-reference our relatively new ability to connect and share and collaborate on a massive scale via social networking with tried and true models of leadership. Sheninger offers a model of school leadership that is practical, and for the most part, well researched. When looked at in terms of a particular context - a particular school in a particular part of the world - and when used as a guide, not a rulebook, Digital Leadership offers much to contribute to a leadership strategy for effective school communication, relationship building and professional learning.
Matthew Ives 11540700 7 References
Alderton, E., Brunsell, E., & Bariexca, D. (2011). The end of isolation. Journal of Online Learning and Teaching, 7(3), 1-14.
Aungst, G. (2014) Book Review: Digital Leadership. Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://www.geraldaungst.com/blog/2014/04/book-review-digital-leadership
Berners-Lee, T. (2009). Tim Berners-Lee on the next Web. TED Talks, TED Conferences, LLC. www.ted.com/talks/tim_berners_lee_on_the_next_web.html
Berliner, D. (2011). Rational responses to high stakes testing: The case of curriculum narrowing and the harm that follows. Cambridge Journal of Education, 41(3), 287-302.
Bouffard, S. (2008). Tapping into technology: The role of the internet in familyschool communication. Retrieved April 20, 2014 from http://www.hfrp.org/publications- resources/browse-our-publications/tapping-into-technology-the-role-of-the-internet-in- family-school-communication
Childwise. (2013). Trends in media use. UK Council for Child Internet Safety. Retrieved April 20, 2014 from http://www.saferinternet.org.uk/content/childnet/safterinternetcentre/downloads/Research _Highlights/UKCCIS_RH50_Childwise_Trends_Report.pdf
Couros, A. V. (2006). Examining the open movement: Possibilities and implications for education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Regina.
Hargreaves, A. (2003). Teaching in the knowledge society: Education in the age of insecurity. Teachers College Press.
Johanson, C. (2014). [Praise for Digital Leadership]. In E. Sheninger, Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. Corwin Press.
Kelly, F. S., McCain, T., & Jukes, I. (Eds.). (2009). Teaching the digital generation: No more cookie-cutter high schools. Corwin Press.
Keeter, S. (2010). How accurate are the statistics derived from Pew Research polls when applied to the population of the United States? Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://pewinternet.tumblr.com/post/4370883375/how-accurate-are-the-statistics-derived- from-pew
Matthew Ives 11540700 8 Lenhart, A., Purcell, K., Smith, A., & Zickuhr, K. (2010). Social Media & Mobile Internet Use among Teens and Young Adults. Millennials. Pew Internet & American Life Project.
mobiThinking. (2014). Global mobile statistics 2014 Home: All the latest stats on mobile Web, apps, marketing, advertising, subscribers, and trends. Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://mobithinking.com/mobile-marketing-tools/latest-mobile-stats
Moravec, J. (2013). Knowmad Society. Education Futures LLC.
Niels, J. (2012). A pedagogical framework for digital tools. Retrieved April 20, 2014 from http://www.edudemic.com/a-pedagogical-framework-for-digital-tools
Pew Internet and American Life Project. (2013). Social networking fact sheet. Retrieved April 20, 2014 from http://www.pewinternet.org/fact-sheets/social-networking-fact-sheet
Robinson, K. (2006). Ken Robinson says schools kill creativity. [Video file]. Retrieved April 21, 2014 from http://www.ted.com/talks/ken_robinson_says_schools_kill_creativity
Sheninger, E. (2014). Digital Leadership: Changing Paradigms for Changing Times. Corwin Press.
Siemens, G. (2004) Connectivism: A learning theory for the digital age. Retrieved April 19, 2014, from http://www.elearnspace.org/Articles/connectivism.htm
Warlick, D. (2009). Grow Your Personal Learning Network: New Technologies Can Keep You Connected and Help You Manage Information Overload. Learning & Leading with Technology, 36(6), 12-16.
Welborn, Z. (2014). Episode 011: From Social Media Opponent to Social Media Expert Archives - Defining Success Podcast. Retrieved April 20, 2014, from http://definingsuccesspodcast.com/category/episode-011-from-social-media-opponent-to- social-media-expert
Wenger, E. (2011). Communities of practice: A brief introduction. Retrieved April 21, 2014 from https://scholarsbank.uoregon.edu/xmlui/bitstream/handle/1794/11736/A%20brief%20intr oduction%20to%20CoP.pdf?sequence=1