Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
= + +
`
(1)
where C is the moisture concentration (kg/m
3
), D is the moisture (liquid and vapor) diffusion coefficient (m
2
/s) and t
is the time (s). Also, C
i
is the initial moisture concentration (kg/m
3
), F0 is the constant flux in stage I drying
(kg/(m
2
s)), and L is the thickness of sample (m). Using this solution, moisture concentration at the top surface is
obtained providing constant F0 and D
I
values. Since stage I drying ends when the surface reaches equilibrium
moisture concentration (i. e. zero), moisture diffusivity at stage I drying is calculated as long as the time of transition
from stage I to stage II has not lapsed.
For stage II drying, analytical solution can be integrated over the thickness of sample. The total amount of diffusing
moisture in stage II drying, M
t
(kg), can be obtained from the corresponding quantity after infinite time,
M
(kg).
Therefore, moisture loss during the advanced phase of drying is given by:
2 2 2
2 2
0
8
1 exp{ (2 1) / 4 }
(2 1)
= +
+
t
II
n
M
D n t L
M n
t
t
(2)
Considering only first term of the series, moisture diffusivity, D
II
(m
2
/s), can be derived by
2
2 ln
4
=
II
L
D a
t
when
2 ln
8
ln 1 ln
t
M
a t
M t
| |
=
|
\ .
(3)
Results show a decreasing trend for the diffusivities at stage II by increasing fiber dosage as shown in Fig. 4. The
diffusivities of fiber reinforced cement paste samples with fiber content of 1.5, 3, 4.5 and 6 kg/m
3
are 2%, 20%, 33%
and 38% less than corresponding value for plain control sample, respectively. Since cracks increase evaporative
surface area of the sample, effect of fiber addition in controlling early-age cracks and causing multiple cracking
results in reduction of moisture diffusivity at stage II comparing to the control sample. Fibers do not affect the
moisture diffusivity at stage I drying.
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-5
The evaporation rate under atmospheric pressure is different from the low pressure desiccator environment since the
rate of water vapor diffusion at the solid-gas interface in the desiccator controls the rate of vaporization and drying.
The diffusion rates of water vapor in low pressure are much higher than that under normal room pressure, because
the diffusion coefficient of gasses is roughly inversely proportional to the gas pressure at constant temperature [37].
Therefore, the calculated diffusion coefficients are only representatives for this low pressure drying condition.
However, the analysis is applicable to drying at normal room pressure providing evaporation rates and ambient
moisture concentration of that test condition.
IMAGE ANALYSIS ON EARLY-AGE CRACKED SAMPLES
Time-lapse photography shows that visible early-age cracks were detected in the sample as early as 3 h and fully
developed by the 4 h, a time period well within the stage I drying (Fig. 5) and earlier than the time of initial setting.
Therefore, the cracks are identified as plastic shrinkage cracks. During stage I, drying takes place under external
mass transfer control, hence potential cracking could not significantly affect evaporation rate. The crack patterns of
two tests series with different fiber dosages and a plain cement paste are shown in Fig. 6. Fiber addition reduced
maximum width of plastic cracks in cement paste samples and made the cracks more uniformly distributed. Images
taken at the end of the tests on F0, F3 and F6 samples were studied to evaluate effects of fiber addition in controlling
plastic shrinkage cracks. Each single image was split to 16 discrete images and after a sequence of image processing
to remove the voids and other non-crack features, the maximum crack width and the cracked area were measured.
The total cracked area of the sample was calculated by the summation of cracked areas of split images and
maximum crack width was obtained as the largest crack width among split images. The results include areal fraction
of cracks which is the ratio of the cracked area to the entire area of the image and maximum crack width. Table 4
shows results of images analysis on two replicates of plain, and fiber-reinforced cement pastes samples with 3 and 6
kg/m
3
AR-glass fibers. While maximum crack width of two plain cement paste samples were calculated as 0.99 and
1.57 mm, the maximum measured crack width of two paste samples with 3 kg/m
3
fiber were 0.62 and 0.74mm. The
correspondent values for two cement paste reinforced with 6 kg/m
3
fiber were calculated as 0.33 and 0.41. This
result indicates that the average of maximum crack width of samples associated with 3 and 6kg/m
3
fibers is 47% and
71% less than corresponding value for the control sample, respectively. Also areal fraction of cracks reduced from
the average value of 0.018 m
2
/m
2
for control sample to 0.014m
2
/m
2
for P0.45-IC0-F3-T24 and 0.007 m
2
/m
2
for
P0.45-IC0-F6-T24 samples. The results indicate 22% and 61% reduction in areal fraction of cracks by adding 3 and
6 kg/m
3
fibers to cement paste, respectively.
Higher moisture diffusivities at stage II in plain pastes with wider cracks compared to fiber reinforced pastes with
narrower but more plentiful cracks are in accordance with the studies performed by Baant and Raftshol [38] and
Aldea et al. [39]. While they found the moisture diffusivity and the water permeability are proportional to the crack
width cubed, results of another experimental study [40] indicated that diffusivity of concrete increased 2.25 times by
shrinkage cracks with a width of 0.1 mm and a spacing of 70 mm. Also, the recent experimental data reported by
Vejmelkov et al. [41] show that moisture diffusivity of high performance concrete and cement pastes increased by
one order of magnitude due to the cracking. In addition, Torrijos et al. [42] reported the increase of water
permeability by one order of magnitude due to increase of crack density from 0.25 to 0.45 cm/cm
2
. Considering all
these results, it can be concluded that fibers reduce moisture diffusivities of cracked samples at stage II by reducing
crack width and crack density which results in the durability improvement of cement-based materials.
CONCLUSION
Drying of cement pastes occurs in two distinct stages: constant drying rate period (stage I) and falling drying rate
period (stage II). During stage I drying, evaporation rate is roughly constant and main phase transitions take place at
the surface, while during stage II drying, phase transitions take place within capillary pores and unsaturated capillary
flow is rate-determining. Results of drying test show that fiber addition to the cement paste results in no significant
reduction in cumulative moisture loss at end of the test. AR-glass fibers caused slight reduction of evaporation rates
at first drying stage. Addition of fibers resulted in a gradual transition of the modes of drying which could be
attributed to the effect of fibers in controlling plastic shrinkage cracks. The transition time from stage I to stage II
drying increases by the addition of fiber. Results of diffusivity analysis show that moisture diffusivity is higher in
stage I by more than one order of magnitude than its values in stage II. It can be concluded that presence of fibers
reduces the stage II diffusivity values through the restraint of cracks, while it does not modify the diffusivity during
stage I. Analysis of shrinkage cracks of plain and fiber reinforced cement paste showed significant effect of fiber
addition in controlling plastic shrinkage cracks.
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-6
REFERENCES
1. Kwon, S.J., Na, U.J., Park, S.S., Jung, S.H., Service life prediction of concrete wharves with early-aged crack:
Probabilistic approach for chloride diffusion, Structural Safety, V. 31, No. 1, 2009, pp. 75-83.
2. Huang, X.M., Yang, C.Y., Early-age concrete cover crack and its effects on concrete cover. Key Engineering
Materials, V. 302-303, pp. 630-6.
3. Yoon, I.S., Schlangen E., de Rooij M.R., van Breugel K., The effect of cracks on chloride penetration into
concrete. Key Engineeing Materials, V. 348-349, 2007, pp. 769-72.
4. Lura, P., Pease, B., Mazzotta, G.B., Rajabipour, F., Weiss, J., Influence of shrinkage reducing admixtures on
development of plastic shrinkage cracks, ACI Materials Journal, V. 104, No. 2, 2007, pp. 18794.
5. Banthia, N., Gupta, R., Plastic shrinkage cracking in cementitious repairs and overlays, Materials and
Structures, V. 42, No. 5, 2009, 567-79.
6. Mora-Ruacho, J., Gettu, R., Aguado A., Influence of shrinkage-reducing admixtures on the reduction of plastic
shrinkage cracking in concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, V.39, No. 3, 2009, pp. 141-6.
7. Cohen, M.D., Olek J., Dolch, W.L., Mechanism of plastic cracking in portland cement and portland cement-
silica fume paste and mortar, Cement Concrete Research, V. 20, No. 1, pp. 1990;103-19.
8. Turcry, P., Loukili, A., Evaluation of plastic shrinkage cracking of self-consolidating concrete, ACI Materials
Journal, V. 103, No. 4, 2006, pp. 272-9.
9. Sanjuan, M.A., Moragues, A., A testing method for measuring plastic shrinkage in polypropylene fibre
reinforced mortars, Materials Letters, V. 21, 1994, pp. 239-46.
10. Nanni, A., Ludwig, D.A., Mcgillis, M.T., Plastic shrinkage cracking of restrained fiber-reinforced concrete,
Transportation Research Record, V. 1382, 1993, pp. 69-72.
11. Banthia, N., Gupta, R., Test method for evaluation of plastic shrinkage cracking in fiber-reinforced
cementitious materials, Experimental Techniques, V. 31, No. 6, 2007, pp. 44-8.
12. Naaman, A.E., Wongtanakitcharoen, T., Hauser, G., Influence of different fibers on plastic shrinkage cracking
of concrete, ACI Materials Journal, V. 102, N. 1, 2005, pp. 49-58.
13. Ma, Y., Zhu, B., Tan, M., Wu, K., Effect of Y type polypropylene fiber on plastic shrinkage cracking of cement
mortar, Materials and Structures, V. 37, 2004, pp. 92-5.
14. Jacobsen, S, Aarseth, L.-I., Effect of wind on drying from wet porous building materials surfaces-A simple
model in steady state, Materials and Structures, V. 32, 1999, pp. 38-44.
15. Shimomura, T., Maekawa, K., Analysis of the drying shrinkage behaviour of concrete using a micromechanical
model based on micropore structure of concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 49, No. 181, 1997, 303-322.
16. Hall, C., Hoff, W.D., Water transport in brick, stone, and concrete New York, Taylor & Francis, 2002.
17. Qi, C., and Weiss, J., Characterization of Plastic Shrinkage Cracking in Fiber-Reinforced Concrete Using
Image Analysis and a Modified Weibull Function, Materials and Structures, V. 35, No. 6, 1997, pp. 386-395.
18. Banthia, N., and Gupta, R., Influence of Polypropylene Fiber Geometry on Plastic Shrinkage Cracking in
Concrete, Cement and Concrete Research, V. 36, No. 7, 2006, pp. 1263-1267.
19. Najm, H., and Balaguru, P., Effect of Large-Diameter Polymeric Fibers on Shrinkage Cracking of Cement
Composites, ACI Materials Journal, V. 99, No. 4, July- Aug., 2002, pp. 345-351.
20. Ma, Y., Tan, M., and Wu, K., Effect Of Different Geometric Polypropylene Fibers on Plastic Shrinkage
Cracking of Cement Mortars, Materials and Structures, V. 35, No. 247, 2002, pp. 165-169.
21. Wongtanakitcharoen, T., and Namaan, A. E., 2007, Unrestrained Early Age Shrinkage of Concrete with
Polypropylene, PVA, and Carbon Fibers, Materials and Structures, V. 40, No. 3, pp. 289-300.
22. ACI Committee 544.5R-10., Report on Physical Properties and Durability of Fiber-Reinforced Concrete,
American Concrete Institute, Farmington Hills, Michigan, 2010.
23. American Society for Testing Materials., Standard Test Method for Evaluating Plastic Shrinkage Cracking of
Restrained Fiber Reinforced Concrete (Using a Steel Form Insert), ASTM C1579 - 06. Annual Book of ASTM
Standards 2008. Section 4. Construction 04.02.
24. American Society for Testing Materials., Standard Test Method for Determining Age at Cracking and Induced
Tensile Stress Characteristics of Mortar and Concrete under Restrained Shrinkage, ASTM C1581/C1581M - 09a.
Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2008. Section 4. Construction 04.02.
25. Copeland, L.E., Hayes, J.C., Determination of non-evaporable water in hardened portland-cement paste.
ASTM Bulletin, 1953, pp. 194:70-4.
26. Majumdar, A.J and Laws, V., Glass fibre reinforced cement, Oxford BSP Professional Books, 1991.
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-7
27. Litherland, K.L., Oakley, D.R. and Proctor, B.A., The use of accelerated aging procedures to predict the long
term strength of GRC composites, Cement and Concrete Research, V. 11, 1981, pp. 455-466.
28. Bentur, A. and Diamond, S., Fracture of glass fiber reinforced cement, Cement and Concrete Research, V. 14,
1984, pp. 31-34.
29. Bentur, A., Mechanisms of potential embrittlement and strength loss of glass fiber reinforced cement
composites, Proceedings - Durability of Glass Fiber Reinforced Concrete Symposium organized by PCI, November
12-15, 1985, Chicago , ed. S. Diamond, 1986, pp. 109-123.
30. Soranakom, C., Bakhshi M. , and Mobasher, B. Role of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers in Suppression of
Restrained Shrinkage Cracking of Concrete Materials, 15th International Glass Fibre Reinforced Concrete
Association Congress, GRC 2008, CD-Proceedings, Prague, April 20-23, 2008.
31 American Society for Testing Materials. Standard Test Method for Time of Setting of Hydraulic Cement by
Vicat Needle, ASTM 191-08. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 2008. Section 4. Construction 04.02.
32. Vu, TH., Influence of pore size distribution on drying behaviour of porous media by a continuous model,
Master of Engineering Dissertation, Otto-von-Guericke-Universitt Magdeburg, Germany.
33. Shimomura, T, Maekawa, K., Analysis of the drying shrinkage behaviour of concrete using a micromechanical
model based on micropore structure of concrete, Magazine of Concrete Research, V. 49, No. 181, 1997, pp. 303-
322.
34. Blandin, H.P., David, J.C., Vergnaud, J.M., Illien, J.P., Malizewicz, M., Modelling of drying of coatings: effect
of the thickness, temperature and concentration of solvent, Progress in Organic Coatings, V. 15, 1987, pp. 163-72.
35. Hulden, M, Hansen CM., Water permeation in coatings, Progress in Organic Coatings, V. 13, 1985, pp. 171-
194.
36. Crank, J., The mathematics of diffusion. New York: Oxford Science Publications, 1989.
37. Cussler, EL., Diffusion: mass transfer in fluid systems. 3rd edition, New York: Cambridge University Press,
2009.
38. Baant, Z.P., Raftshol, W.J., Effect of cracking in drying and shrinkage specimens, Cement and Concrete
Research, V. 12, 1982, pp. 209-226.
39. Aldea C.-M., Shah, S.P., Karr, A., Effect of cracking on water and chloride permeability of concrete, Journal
of. Materials in Civil Engineering, V. 11, No. 3, 1999, pp. 181-187.
40. Baant, Z.P., Sener, S., Kim, J.K., Effect of cracking on drying permeability and diffusivity of concrete, ACI
Materials Journal, V. 84, No. 5, 1987, pp. 351358.
41. Vejmelkov, E., Padevet, P., Cerny, R., Effect of cracks on hygric and thermal characteristics of concrete,
Bauphysik, V. 30, No. 6, 2008, pp. 43844.
42. Torrijos, M.C., Giaccio, G., Zerbino, R., Internal cracking and transport properties in damaged concretes,
Materials and Structures, V. 43, 2010, pp. 10921.
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-8
Table 1- Comparison of physical properties of AR-glass fiber and other types of fibers
Fiber Type Nylon Polypropylene Steel AR Glass
Specific Gravity 1.14 0.91 7.2 2.68
Modulus of Elasticity 750 Ksi 500 Ksi 29,000 Ksi 10,000 Ksi
Tensile Strength 140 Ksi 66 Ksi 160 Ksi 250 Ksi
Table 2- Mix proportions of the test series
Test series
Portland
cement
Water
AR-glass
fiber
w/c
F0 1450 650 0 0.45
F1.5 1450 650 1.5 0.45
F3 1450 650 3 0.45
F4.5 1450 650 4.5 0.45
F6 1450 650 6 0.45
Table 3- Results of evaporation tests and diffusivity analysis
Test series
Initial
evaporation
rate
(kg/(m
2
.h))
Transition
time of
drying
stages
(h)
Evaporation
rate at 24 h
(kg/(m
2
.h))
Cumulative
moisture loss
at 24 h
(g)
Moisture
diffusivity
at stage I
(m
2
/s)
Moisture
diffusivity
at stage II
(m
2
/s)
F0 0.42 9:45 0.024 65 5.15E-07 3.33E-09
F1.5 0.42 10:00 0.043 64 5.05E-07 3.27E-09
F3 0.41 11:10 0.036 65 5.19E-07 2.64E-09
F4.5 0.40 11:30 0.028 65 5.15E-07 2.22E-09
F6 0.38 11:20 0.087 66 5.11E-07 2.08E-09
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-9
Table 4. Results of image analysis of cracks in AR-glass fiber and plain cement pastes
Test
series
Specimen
Code
Maximum
Crack Width
(mm)
Average
Maximum
Crack Width
(mm)
Areal Fraction
of Cracks
(mm
2
/mm
2
)
Average
Areal Fraction
of Cracks
(mm
2
/mm
2
)
F0
1 0.99
1.28
0.017
0.018
2 1.57 0.020
F3
1 0.62
0.68
0.010
0.014
2 0.74 0.018
F6
1 0.33
0.37
0.006
0.007
2 0.41 0.007
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-10
Vacuum
Pump
Condenser
(Dry Ice and Alcohol)
Camera
Desiccator
Strain Gage Transducer Amplifier
and Computer Interface Unit
Data Acquisition System
Pressure
Regulator
Pressure
Gauge
Load
Cell
Sample
Figure 1a- Test setup for drying under low-pressure condition
Figure 1b- Plan view of the mold (dimensions in mm)
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-11
0
20
40
60
80
C
u
m
u
l
a
t
i
v
e
M
o
i
s
t
u
r
e
L
o
s
s
,
g
0 5 10 15 20 25
Drying Time, h
0
1.5
3
4.5
6
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
E
v
a
p
o
r
a
t
i
o
n
R
a
t
e
,
k
g
/
(
m
2
.
h
)
0.1 1 10 100
Drying Time, h
P0.45-IC0-Fxx-T24
Fiber
Content
(kg/m
3
)
Figure 2- Results of evaporation tests on cement paste samples with different content of AR-glass fibers
Figure 3- Boundary conditions and Ficks 2nd law of diffusion for the presented drying problem
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-12
4.4E-007
5.2E-007
D
i
f
f
u
s
i
v
i
t
y
,
m
2
/
s
0 2 4 6
Fiber Content, kg/m
3
1.8E-009
2.4E-009
3E-009
3.6E-009
Stage II Drying
Stage I Drying
Figure 4- Results of diffusivity analysis on cement paste samples with different content of AR-glass fibers
Drying time: 15 min, 3h, 3h 15min
Drying time: 3h 30min, 4h, 24h
Figure 5- 2-D Crack development during vacuum drying of a fresh plain cement paste sample
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-13
F0
F3 F6
Figure 6- Crack pattern of cement paste specimens with and without AR-glass fibers after 24 hours of drying
under low-pressure condition
SP280-3: Simulated Shrinkage Cracking in the Presence of Alkali Resistant Glass Fibers
3-14