Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Where:
= the coefficient
Z Php.48,000 1 Php.11,400 1 0 0
Y Php.43,000 2 Php.8,900 2 0 0
X Php.40,000 3 Php.4,000 4
1
W Php.37,000 4 Php.6,500 3 1 1
V Php.30,000 5 Php.3,200 5 0 0
U Php.28,000 6 Php.2,800 6 0 0
T Php.25,000 7 Php.2,600 7 0 0
S Php.19,000 8 Php.1,600 10
4
R Php.17,000 9 Php.1,900 9 0 0
Q Php.14,000 10 Php.2,200 8 2 4
d=0 d
2
=10
Solution:
Conclusion: With the result of
Conclusion: Therefore in this situation it shows that the allowance of the students has a
little correlation to their grades. This means that the allowance of the students has
nothing to do if they get a high grade or a low grade.
Interpretation:
1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
-if there is perfect positive correlation between variables, the pairs of ranks for each individual
will be identical
-if the relationship drops, the differences and
increase and
Strong
negative
correlation
Strong
positive
correlation
Weak
negative
correlation
Weak
positive
correlation
Little
correlation
- however, you must interpret in the context of the question.
-Spearman coefficient is nothing more than the Pearson r applied to untied ranks, and it would
be interpreted as the same manner as the Pearson r
-if some of the ranks are tied, the formula for