4 views

Uploaded by La Paloma

nessesary

nessesary

© All Rights Reserved

- Statistical Methods
- Probability and Statistics For Engineers FinalExam_2007-1
- Agriculture Journal; Interspecific Variation in Salt Tolerance of Some Acacia Species at Seed Germination Stage
- Questions in Critiquing a Scientific Journal
- Assignment 2 Question and Instruction
- FoneGigs_AdCopyAnalysis
- Assignment - MB0050 Research Methodology
- DX7-02C-Gen2Factorial-P1_baterías
- i o 3514861491
- 14046-finalproject
- A Study of Agricultural Finance by Commercial
- Ashish Report Intern Summer'13
- Leanmap_FREE_Six_Sigma_Tool_Overview.xlsx
- ANOVA Exercises
- International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)
- Teaching Bio Statistics to PGP-HS Students
- Maraming Sulat Sht
- IRAVO MA-PHD Human Resource Management -2011
- Star Slides
- PPD for

You are on page 1of 15

---------------------------

DISSERTATION

THE EFFECT OF SMARTPHONE ON THE STUDENT

RESULT OF THE STUDENT IN FOREIGN TRADE

UNIVERSITY BRANCH II

Student ID

Phm Th Hnh 1201017091

Nguyn Ngc Huy 1201017131

inh Tin Ph 1201017261

Trn Bch Phng 1201017283

Nguyn Ngc Thy Qunh 1201017300

Nguyn Th Bch Trm 1201017394

Ho Chi Minh City April, 2014

List of members

No Full Name Student ID

1 Phm Th Hnh 1201017091

2 Nguyn Ngc Huy 1201017131

3 inh Tin Ph 1201017261

4 Trn Bch Phng 1201017283

5 Nguyn Ngc Thy Qunh 1201017300

6 Nguyn Th Bch Trm 1201017394

THE EFFECT OF SMARTPHONE ON THE STUDENT RESULT OF THE

STUDENT IN FOREIGN TRADE UNIVERSITY BRANCH II

ABSTRACT

In this digitization world, media is constantly improved day by day. From the laptop

to the cell phone, especially smart phone. Using modern technology to serve for the

purpose of learning is really a powerful tool. However, beside the good side, it still

has some downsides surround the use of phone. Almost student use smart phone more

than 2 hours each day. Spending too much time using phone may be the reason makes

scores student feel lack of concentration, lacking of sleeping or even though it can

makes student live in digital world and live far away from people around them. So

how about student of Foreign Trade University II? Using smart phone too much make

effect on learning outcomes? Isnt it? Thus, our group researched, reviewed and

analyzed the relationship between the time using smart phone of student at FTU2 in

Ho Chi Minh City and their learning outcomes. Purposes of researching is

understanding clearly the degree of influence of time using smart phone to the result

of learning and review that if spending lots of times on using smart phone, Will they

really effect to your learning outcomes? If yes, we will show some ways to surmount

this situation. Through the using of factor ANOVA variance methods from the direct

survey 245 students, we have a conclusion that using smart phone too much can effect

to students results. Finally, our group will expose some ways to restrict using smart

phone excessively and how to use efficiently to promote the learning outcomes of

each student.

KEY WORDS: Learning outcome, time of using, analysis of variance, foreign trade

university 2, students, one-way ANOVA, Tukey's HSD test

1. Introduction

Nowadays, along with the evolution of Information Technology, telephones are not

only for texting and calling purposes, but they also help us to connect with each other

via social networks, email and other online services... These smartphones are

becoming more modern and helpful day after day. However, overusing smartphone

may cause many negative effects on everyone especially college students. These

effects include decline in health, waste of time and decrease in study result... The

decrease in study result is the most serious consequence when smartphones are getting

commoner among the students.

The phenomenon that smartphones are addictive and affect many respects of life is no

new problem. It has appeared so many times on the media. This is an unsolvable

problem for the students as well as a deep concern for the parents. Therefore we

decide to carry on the topic The effect of smartphone on the study result of the

student in Foreign Trade University branch II by analyzing One - factor ANOVA.

We find down how the percentage, scale and usage of smartphone of the second-year

student of Foreign Trade University branch II in HCMC change their study result as

well as propose some solution to overcome this worrying problem.

2. Theory and research methodology

2.1. Theoretical basis and Analysis framework

While the analysis of variance succeeded in the 20th century, antecedents extend

centuries into the past according to Stigler. These include hypothesis testing, the

partitioning of sums of squares, experimental techniques and the additive model.

Laplace was performing hypothesis testing in the 1770s. The development of least-

squares methods by Laplace and Gauss circa 1800 provided an improved method of

squares. By 1827, Laplace was using least squares methods to address ANOVA

problems regarding measurements of atmospheric tides.

The phrase analysis of variance was coined by Sir Ronald Aylmer Fisher, a

statistician of the twentieth century, who defined it as the separation of variance

ascribable to one group of causes from the variance ascribable to the other groups.

Tests hypotheses are made about differences between two or more means. If

independent estimates of variance can be obtained from the data, ANOVA compares

the means of different groups by analyzing comparisons of variance estimates. There

are two models for ANOVA, the fixed effects model, and the random effects model

(in the latter, the treatments are not fixed).

The purpose of analysis of variance is to see if there is any difference between groups

on some variable. In research, analysis of variance is used as a way to consider the

effect of a cause factor to the results factor.

The method contains:

Supposing we have k groups 1, 2, 3 k (may be different from size). Calling

1,2,3.k

Xij: observation j of group i

Group 1 Group 2 Group k

x

11

x

12

x

21

x

22

x

k1

x

k2

x

1n1

x

2n2

x

knk

Hypothesis: Ho 1=2=k

H1: 1differnt 2different k

Step 1 : Find the average each group : =

Find the average each group: ): =

Step 2 : Find total sum of squares

SSW- Within groups sum of squares:

SSW=SS1+SS2+SSK=

SSG Between group sum of squares

SSG=

Total sum of squares SST=SSW+SSG=

Step 3: Find variances

MSW (mean square within): MSW=

MSB (mean square between): MSB=

Step 4: One-way ANOVA Table

Source of

variation

SS

(sum of

square)

Df

(degrees of

freedom)

MS

(mean of

square)

F ratio

Between

Samples

SSB k-1

MSB=

F=

Within

Samples

SSW n-k MSW=

Total SST n-1

In: k number of populations

N Sum of the sample size from all populations

df Degrees of freedom

HSD (honest significant difference) test

The purpose of the analysis of variance is to test the hypothesis H0 that the

overall average is equal. After the analysis and conclusions, there are two cases which

can occur: H0 hypothesis is accepted or rejected .If the hypothesis H0 is accepted,

analysis will end. If the hypothesis H0 is rejected, the overall average is not equal. So

the next further issue is to analyze and identify that any group is different from other

groups, the average of groups is greater or smaller.

There are many methods to calculate when hypothesis H0 is rejected. We use

Tukey method. The content of this method is to compare pairs of the average

groups at a significance level for all possible tested pairs to detect the different

groups .

Example:

Research by U.S. scientists at Kent State University of Ohio found that students-

students using smart phone too much can lead to anxiety and learning outcome

decline. The researcher surveyed 500 students on daily smartphone usage , lifestyle

analysis and academic scores for the purpose of considering whether smartphones can

help improve their lives or not.

The result shows that using smartphone too much has scores of disadvantage. Students

who use too much have the worst score but they are at the highest level of anxiety.

The team reported in the journal Computers in Human Behavior majors: "When the

frequency of mobile phone use is too high, the degree of success in learning and in life

fell comfortable. Statistical modeling suggests that such relationships are clear.

Research of Dr. Karla Murdock at Washington Lee (USA) University has the same

result. This research shows that students who send a lot of message usually less sleep

and more stress than others.

Based on that, we decide to use analysis of variance and Tukey's HSD test to survey

whether using smartphone affects to the study result of the second-year student of

FTU II or not.

2.2 Methods of data collection and model estimation technique

The data used in this research is collected from the researchers questionnaires.

Because of time and resources restriction, the researchers only carry survey on 238

people. Therefore, the result cannot generalize for the whole set because each

individual surveyed has their own features and cannot represent for the whole set.

We had to choose the one factor ANOVA to analyze. Compare the average of

many populations based on the average of models. Consider the effect of one factor

reason to result factor.

3. Results and discussion

3.1 Descriptive data

Below is the data collected from 238 people, questioned about how many hours

the sophomore of FTU II use smartphone and their study result / average mark? Base

on their using hour, we divided them into 4 groups (as shown in the table). The unit of

measure is hour.

Groups of factor

from 0h to 2h >2h to 4h >4h to 6h >6h

8,88 7,20 7,90 7,11

8,12 8,17 8,00 7,90

7,90 8,04 7,00 7,80

8,79 8,30 7,80 7,00

8,00 8,00 6,00 8,79

7,80 7,60 5,70 7,20

7,00 8,07 6,70 8,79

8,40 7,80 6,80 5,60

8,90 8,00 7,60 8,00

7,50 8,40 7,00 6,80

9,00 7,60 7,80 6,40

8,50 8,00 7,80 6,90

8,70 8,70 7,00 6,60

9,20 8,40 8,20 7,20

8,90 8,30 7,00 7,30

8,00 8,00 7,90 6,70

7,90 7,60 7,80 6,80

8,20 7,90 8,46 7,00

8,50 7,80 7,20 5,80

7,80 8,00 6,20 8,00

8,00 7,80 8,20 6,80

8,50 7,40 8,40 7,00

8,90 6,70 8,50 7,20

8,00 8,60 8,10 7,60

7,00 8,00 8,30 6,00

8,70 9,10 7,50 7,10

6,80 7,90 6,60 8,00

9,00 7,00 7,70 5,80

7,80 9,03 8,80 7,00

7,60 8,00 8,60 7,12

7,60 7,90 8,00 7,12

7,30 7,70 7,00 5,00

8,20 8,80 7,00 7,12

7,50 7,70 7,00 7,12

7,90 9,00 7,40 6,19

8,00 6,90 7,40 6,95

7,80 7,70 7,90 6,95

8,80 8,00 8,00 5,54

7,60 7,85 7,44 6,68

8,20 7,00 7,67 6,68

8,50 8,50 7,12 6,34

7,00 8,60 7,32 5,00

8,00 7,40 7,32 6,45

7,80 8,30 7,67 6,45

8,30 8,29 7,55 5,54

8,29 8,50 7,12 5,62

6,80 6,00 7,12 5,62

7,00 7,83 7,44 5,14

8,16 7,00 6,95 7,80

7,60 7,46 7,85 7,00

8,23 8,20 7,67 4,00

6,50 7,60 6,00 7,90

6,50 8,19 7,80 5,00

7,58 8,15 6,86

6,80 5,00

8,16 6,00

8,87 7,50

8,45

8,45

8,45

8,89

8,90

8,45

7,40

7,60

7,90

7,30

9,12

8,80

9,27

8,34

8,50

6,50

8,00

3.2 One-way ANOVA model

Hypothesis:

Ho: There is no different in the average monthly food cost between 4 group. (1 = 2

= 3 = 4)

H1: The average monthly food cost of them are not equal.

Table 1: Anova: Single Factor by Excel

SUMMARY

Groups Count Sum Average Variance

from 0h to 2h 74 595,6 8,048648649 0,485674861

>2h to 4h 54 427,98 7,925555556 0,354579874

>4h to 6h 57 421,66 7,39754386 0,569683145

>6h 53 356,52 6,726792453 0,961922206

ANOVA

Source of

Variation SS df MS F P-value F crit

Between

Groups 63,15854893 3 21,05284964 36,17827298 3,02055E-19 2,64318

Within

Groups 136,1692091 234 0,581919697

Total 199,327758 237

If F > F crit, we reject the null hypothesis. As we can see in the table above:

36.178273 > 2.6432. Therefore, we reject the null hypothesis. The means of the four

populations are not all equal. At least one of the means is different. Therefore, we can

say that the hour for using smart phone does affect how much to the result / average

mark of students.

3.3 HSD (honest significant difference) test

Because the null hypothesis has been rejected, the result / average mark of four

groups are not equal. However, in order to find out how they differ from each other,

we need to do Tukeys HSD (honest significant difference) test and compare each

couple of group.

t-Test: Two-Sample Assuming Equal Variances

From 0h to 2h and >2h to 4h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 1 - 2 =0

Table 2: Tukeys HSD test (from 0h to 2h and >2h to 4h) by Excel

from 0h to 2h >2h to 4h

Mean 8,048648649 7,925555556

Variance 0,485674861 0,354579874

Observations 74 54

Pooled Variance 0,430531732

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 126

t Stat 1,048187211

P(T<=t) one-tail 0,14827941

t Critical one-tail 1,657036982

P(T<=t) two-tail 0,296558819

t Critical two-tail 1,978970602

In this table: -1.978970602 < 1.048187211 < 1.978970602 . Therefore, 1 - 2 = 0 ,

the result / average mark of the two groups are different.

From 0h to 2h and >4h to 6h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 1 - 3 = 0

Table 3: Tukeys HSD test (from 0h to 2h and >4h to 6h) by Excel

from 0h to 2h >4h to 6h

Mean 8,048648649 7,39754386

Variance 0,485674861 0,569683145

Observations 74 57

Pooled Variance 0,522143574

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 129

t Stat 5,112973725

P(T<=t) one-tail 5,58858E-07

t Critical one-tail 1,656751594

P(T<=t) two-tail 1,11772E-06

t Critical two-tail 1,978524491

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null

hypothesis. In this table: 5.112973725 > 1.978524491. Therefore, 1 3 , the result /

average mark of the two groups are different.

From to 2h and >6h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 1 - 4 = 0

Table 4: Tukeys HSD test (from to 2h and >6h) by Excel

from 0h to 2h >6h

Mean 8,048648649 6,726792453

Variance 0,485674861 0,961922206

Observations 74 53

Pooled Variance 0,683793757

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 125

t Stat 8,883284671

P(T<=t) one-tail 2,94495E-15

t Critical one-tail 1,657135178

P(T<=t) two-tail 5,88989E-15

t Critical two-tail 1,979124109

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null

hypothesis. In this table: 8.883284671 > 1.979124109. Therefore, 1 4 , the result

/ average mark of the two groups are different.

>2h to 4h and >4h to 6h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 2 - 3 = 0

Table 5: Tukeys HSD test (>2h to 4h and >4h to 6h) by Excel

>2h to 4h >4h to 6h

Mean 7,925555556 7,39754386

Variance 0,354579874 0,569683145

Observations 54 57

Pooled Variance 0,465091647

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 109

t Stat 4,077059893

P(T<=t) one-tail 4,34777E-05

t Critical one-tail 1,658953458

P(T<=t) two-tail 8,69554E-05

t Critical two-tail 1,98196749

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null

hypothesis. In this table: 4.077059893 > 1.98196749. Therefore, 2 3 , the result /

average mark of the two groups are different.

>2h to 4h and >6h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 2 - 4 = 0

Table 6: Tukeys HSD test (>2h to 4h and >6h) by Excel

>2h to 4h >6h

Mean 7,925555556 6,726792453

Variance 0,354579874 0,961922206

Observations 54 53

Pooled Variance 0,655358934

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 105

t Stat 7,65837593

P(T<=t) one-tail 4,86251E-12

t Critical one-tail 1,659495383

P(T<=t) two-tail 9,72502E-12

t Critical two-tail 1,982815274

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null

hypothesis. In this table: 7.65837593 > 1.982815274. Therefore, 2 4, the result /

average mark of the two groups are different.

>4h to 6h and >6h

Hypothesis:

Ho: 3 - 4 = 0

Table 7: Tukeys HSD test (>4h to 6h and >6h) by Excel

>4h to 6h >6h

Mean 7,39754386 6,726792453

Variance 0,569683145 0,961922206

Observations 57 53

Pooled Variance 0,758538989

Hypothesized Mean

Difference 0

df 108

t Stat 4,03600465

P(T<=t) one-tail 5,09091E-05

t Critical one-tail 1,659085144

P(T<=t) two-tail 0,000101818

t Critical two-tail 1,982173483

If t Stat < -t Critical two-tail or t Stat > t Critical two-tail, we reject the null

hypothesis. In this table: 4.03600465 >1.982173483. Therefore, 3 4, the result /

average mark of the two groups are different.

Through the analyzing process above, we can say that the result / average mark differs

significantly as the hour for using smart phone change, except the case of group 1 and

2, cause the difference in the hour for using smart phone between them is not big

enough.

4. Conclusion and Policy Implication

After researching influences of using smartphones on the study results of Foreign

Trade University II students, we can know that the time of using smartphones plays an

important role in their study results.

Although study results depend on many impacts such as intelligence, hard-working,

study method and so on, time for studying is also a very essential one. The more time

students spend on using smartphones, the less time they spend on studying. When a

student spend more time on learning, his or her study results will be certain better and

vice versa. It is very clear that screen time right before bed is bad for sleep. And using

your smartphone late at night also makes you feel depleted in the morning, thereby

making you less focused and engaged at studying.

To have a good study result, a student need know how to arrange study time and

reasonable entertainment. Time for using smartphones should be within a certain

limit. It will be better for students health as well as study results if they do not use

smartphone after 9 pm. Smartphones only brings much benefit and convenience when

students know how to use them reasonably.

REFERENCE:

1. Fisher .Ronald Aylmer ,sir (1890-1962) -The analysis of variance with various

binomial transformations

2. Landau S, Everitt BS. A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SPSS,

Chapman & Hall/CRC, 2004.

3. Fisher, Ronald Aylmer, Sir, 1890-1962-Answer to query 114 on the effect of

errors of grouping in an analysis of variance

4. Wikipedia, Articles about Tukeys HSD test.

5. Hoang Tran Van and Van Le Hong (2013), Principles of Statistics, Vietnam

National University-Ho Chi Minh City Press, Ho Chi Minh City.

6. David F.G., Patrick W.S., Phillip C.F. and Kent D.S. (2010), Business Statistics

8th edition, Pearson.

- Statistical MethodsUploaded byAnmol Jain
- Probability and Statistics For Engineers FinalExam_2007-1Uploaded bya.b
- Agriculture Journal; Interspecific Variation in Salt Tolerance of Some Acacia Species at Seed Germination StageUploaded byAgriculture Journal
- Questions in Critiquing a Scientific JournalUploaded byBernard Baluyot
- Assignment 2 Question and InstructionUploaded byShoaib Ahmed
- FoneGigs_AdCopyAnalysisUploaded byEric Melchor
- Assignment - MB0050 Research MethodologyUploaded byShashank Garg
- DX7-02C-Gen2Factorial-P1_bateríasUploaded byIvan Ca
- i o 3514861491Uploaded byAnonymous 7VPPkWS8O
- 14046-finalprojectUploaded byALAA
- A Study of Agricultural Finance by CommercialUploaded byBiju Joseph
- Ashish Report Intern Summer'13Uploaded byluckydhruv
- Leanmap_FREE_Six_Sigma_Tool_Overview.xlsxUploaded byDeepak Rustagi
- ANOVA ExercisesUploaded byBiggy M Robut
- International Journal of Mathematics and Statistics Invention (IJMSI)Uploaded byinventionjournals
- Teaching Bio Statistics to PGP-HS StudentsUploaded byPriaa
- Maraming Sulat ShtUploaded byGustav Sanchez
- IRAVO MA-PHD Human Resource Management -2011Uploaded bysleshi
- Star SlidesUploaded byMed Student
- PPD forUploaded byajaywadhwani
- 46178Uploaded byjjjj
- Parametric GROWTH and SURVIVAL of Siganid GuttatusUploaded byElsie Joy Dagpin Licarte
- skittles 2 daneUploaded byapi-253137548
- ILT No Author DetailsUploaded byNor Syahirah Mohamad
- PLS Alg Awal.docxUploaded byKristina Sidabariba
- OutputUploaded byNurhidayah Hafid
- 1550-2783-10-41Uploaded byJordiGimenez
- Schmideretal.2010MethIsItReallyRobustUploaded byDiogo Fernandes
- 10. Ans Q2 8.2 Garden Snail PopulationUploaded byfadzlin84
- SPSS InstructionsUploaded byFaux Lexie

- Adsk Gsg Acad2008Uploaded byLucian
- Interfacing Electrification and System ReliabilityUploaded byPavan
- Hot Water CirculationUploaded byAbdul Raheem
- 9 Forbes 2008Uploaded byUnggul Kustiawan
- News 32Uploaded bygurus_net
- ABB Reference List 03 L12943Uploaded bySafitri
- HPE StoreEasy 1000 Series StorageUploaded byprimus2010
- TBE3Uploaded bypasteman
- High Rise Garbage Disposal SysUploaded bySivaRaman
- EmentaUploaded byLis Len
- IEC 60297-3-102Uploaded byraj_rajesh_eee
- 118-DMR_Quad-Ring-GrooveDesign_01.pdfUploaded byRaja Sekaran Sajja
- Lec-5 Image Analysis-Boundary DetectionUploaded bybalasha_937617969
- GA90-315 Power Point REV3Uploaded byamitans2003
- partes fso-4305.pdfUploaded bycheolll
- Job Description for Hotel Operations ManagerUploaded byImee S. Yu
- Reciprocating CompressorUploaded byBalaji Kalai
- ObjectivesUploaded byjanardhanvn
- FPSOUploaded byCarly Rheman
- C5Uploaded bysiva kumar
- Strategic Management - M & aUploaded byGio Perdana
- Protection MannualUploaded byNesarkiran Bagade
- NECA SL2100 Communication System BrochureUploaded byNiel Darius
- Re-Launching Pharmaceutical Mega BrandsUploaded byGiovanny Leon
- Book of AbstractsUploaded byNIET14
- TestUploaded byChetan Negi
- Bim WhitepaperUploaded bypeterhwilliams
- Results of Halon 1301 and Hfc - 125 Concentration Tests on a Large Commercial Aircraft Engine InstallationUploaded byrohen87
- Common-Airbus Tooling.pdfUploaded byChris Calnan
- EMS DocumentationUploaded byiqjreyna