Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 6

Committee on NFPA 730

M E M O R A N D U M


TO: NFPA Technical Committee on Premises Security

FROM: Jeanne Moreau-Correia

DATE: October 23, 2009

SUBJECT: NFPA730 ROP Letter Ballot Final Results

The Final Results of the NFPA 730 ROP Letter Ballot are as follows:

30 Members Eligible to Vote
10 Ballots Not Returned (D. Abbott, A. Apo, T. Chronister, D. Collins, C. King III,
B. Strother, R. Walker, L. Weeks, R. Mahnke, and P. Murphy)

18 Affirmative on All
2 Negatives on one or more proposals as noted in report
0 Abstentions on one or more proposals as noted in report

The number of affirmative votes need for the report to be published is 14.
(30 eligible to vote - 10 not returned - 0 abstentions = 20 0.66 = 13.2).

In all cases, an affirmative vote of at least a simple majority of the total membership
eligible to vote is required.
(30 of eligible voting members 2 = 15 (16)

Reasons for negative votes, etc. from alternate members are not included unless the ballot
from the principal member was not received.

According to the final ballot results, all ballot items received the necessary 2/3 required
affirmative votes to pass ballot.

ATTACHMENT: (Final) Circulation Explanation
Circulation Explanation Report for PMM-AAA Proposals
Friday, October 23, 2009
Document # 730
730-1 Entire Document (Log #CP21 )
Affirmative with Comment
Fiore, L. The TC voted to leave NFPA 730 as a Guide. When a global change was made, the definitions of
"Guide," 3.2.3, and "Standard," 3.2.7, were somehow interchanged. In fact, "Guide" was struck out. This is an
editorial error and should be corrected.
Tierney, M. As requested, providing the revision dates for the referenced BHMA standards.
1 Butts & Hinges Oct-06
2 Locks & Latches Oct-03
3 Exit Devices Sep-08
4 Closers Oct-09
5 Cylinders Mar-01
12 Interconnected Nov-05
13 Mortise Locks J un-05
16 Auxiliary Hardware Sep-09
17 Self Closing Hinges May-04
24 Delayed Egress Aug-03
25 Electrified Locks Dec-07
28 Master Keying Sep-07
30 HiSecurity Cylinders Dec-07
31 Electric Strikes Sep-07
730-2 Chapters 1 thru 5 (Log #CP6 )
Negative
Mucci, A. New paragraph 3.2.7 defining "Guide" is not consistent with other NFPA documents. The definition of "Guide" must
remain as defined in 3.2.3. Paragraph 3.2.3 is currently proposed to be stricken. This will be confusing and potentially will be
misinterpreted or applied by readers, users, and AHJ s. The definition of a "Guide" must remain consistent throughout. Examples in
other NFPA documents include;
NFPA 101A, Guide on Alternative Approaches to Life Safety, 2010 Edition
3.2.3 Guide. A document that is advisory or informative in nature and that contains only nonmandatory provisions. A guide may
contain mandatory statements such as when a guide can be used, but the document as a whole is not suitable for adoption into law.
NFPA 450, Guide for Emergency Medical Services and Systems, 2009 Edition
3.2.3 Guide. A document that is advisory or informative in nature and that contains only nonmandatory provisions. A guide may
contain mandatory statements such as when a guide can be used, but the document as a whole is not suitable for adoption into law.
NFPA 550, Guide to the Fire Safety Concepts Tree, 2007 Edition
3.2.3 Guide. A document that is advisory or informative in nature and that contains only nonmandatory provisions. A guide may
contain mandatory statements such as when a guide can be used, but the document as a whole is not suitable for adoption into law.
Etc.
The proposed definition for paragraph 3.2.7 is suggesting that the entire document be located in the appendix or annex because a
guide as defined throughout NFPA contains only nonmanditory provisions that are not suitable for adoption into law.
I believe that as a committee, this is what we agreed on during our ROP meeting.
Simpson, J. The proposed revision to the definition of Guide and proposed revision to the definition of should are not in
compliance with the 2009 Regulations Governing Committee Projects, Section 3.3.6.1. In addition, I see no technical or compelling
substantiation to alter these fundamental definitions.
Affirmative with Comment
Martin, S. 3.2.3 & 3.2.7 Editorial correction... The definition of Guide is actually for a Standard and the definition for Should is
the definition for Shall.
Murphy, J. Annex A.1.2 uses the word "Standard" where it should have the word "Guide".
Section 3.2.3. Guide has been deleted. This definition needs to be reinstated.
Section 3.2.7. Guide has been added. The definition listed is for a Standard. This section should be deleted.
Section 3.2.5. Should - The definition listed is for Shall. This definition should be deleted.
Section 3.2.6. Should has been deleted. The definition listed is accurate and should remain in the Guide
730-8 Chapters 6 thru 10 (Log #CP7 )
Negative
1
Circulation Explanation Report for PMM-AAA Proposals
Friday, October 23, 2009
Document # 730
Simpson, J. A.6.5.1 - The General Duty Clause covered under the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 uses the word
"shall" not "should" (Each employer shall furnish to each of his employees employment and a place of employment which are free
from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm)
730-14 Chapter 13 (Log #CP10 )
Affirmative with Comment
Mucci, A. To completely meet the intent of this proposal and eliminate any possibility of misinterpretation or implication,
Chapter 1 should include an exclusion stating that, "One- and Two-Family Dwellings are not covered by this document".
Sheets, R. Chapter 1 should include an exclusion stating " One- and Two-Family Dwellings are not mandated by this document".
Tierney, M. Not a negative, but disagree with removing the useful residential information prior to finding another home for it.
730-25 Annex E (Log #CP24 )
Affirmative with Comment
2
Circulation Explanation Report for PMM-AAA Proposals
Friday, October 23, 2009
Document # 730
Chavez, L. Edits are shown using track changes:
E.3.4.1 Burglary-Resistant Glazing Materials. ANSI / UL 972 provides performance testing
requirements for burglary-resisting glazing materials. These materials are intended for use
indoors and outdoors, principally as a substitute for plate (or float) glass show windows and
showcase panels. They are designed to resist the hit-and-run (smash-and-grab) type of burglary.
E.3.5.4 Electronic Cylinders. Electronic cylinders are useful in applications where there is a
high user turnover and a need to collect access data and to limit access to particular periods.
They are often used in conjunction with card readers, biometrics, and so on. Electronic cylinders should meet
the requirements of ANSI/BHMA A156.30 in the appropriate grade for the application. Electronic Cylinders for
burglary resistance should be listed to ANSI / UL 1034.
E.3.5.11 Bored/Cylindrical Locks. These lock designs provide convenient installation along
with moderate security. Different locking functions are offered to meet access needs, such as
non-keyed locking (for bathrooms) and keyed entry. For enhanced resistance to forced entry,
doors with these locks can have a separate deadbolt mounted on the door; however, local codes should be
consulted, since the second lock requires two actions for egress. Recent product developments have greatly
increased the strength and durability of these locks in order to retrofit existing installations with more secure
locking solutions. These locks should meet ANSI/BHMA A156.2 andANSI / UL 437 in the appropriate grade
for the application.
E.3.5.12 Interconnected Locks. These lock designs combine cylindrical locks and deadbolts
and are used in residential occupancy where one motion is required to open the door. They
include independently installed cylindrical and deadbolt locks that contain a linkage that allows instant
retraction of the deadbolt with movement of the interior lever handle or knob. They combine the security and
safety of a latching device with the security of a deadbolt. These locks should meet ANSI/BHMA A156.12 and
ANSI / UL 437 in the appropriate grade for the application.
E.3.5.13 Mortise Locks. These lock designs are typically used in institutional and high-rise
residential applications. They can incorporate both a latch and a deadbolt in the same body.
Mortise locks allow a deadbolt with latch in a path of egress because the latch and deadbolt are retracted in a
single motion. Mortise locks can be designed with a low-cost failure point, shear pin, spindle, and so forth,
making their application attractive for locations that are apt to receive a lot of abuse. Mortise locks should meet
ANSI/BHMA A156.13 andANSI/ UL 437 in the appropriate grade for the application.
E.3.5.14 Electromechanical Locks. Electromechanical door locks are primarily used to control entry into an
area. They can be opened via key (mechanically activated) or electrically by
receiving power from a power supply after the valid presentation of a code to a secure encrypted electronic
credential (e.g., magnetic/stripe card, proximity card, smart card, digital keypad). They can also be remotely
activated by a simple pushbutton or intercom system. Some of the advantages of using these locks are code-
compliant operation, low cost, easy installation, simple operation, and integration with access control systems.
Electromechanical locks should meet ANSI/BHMA A156.25 in the appropriate grade for the application.
Electrified locking devices should also meet the performance requirements as defined by the applicable
ANSI/BHMA A156 series of guides for the product and grade specified by the manufacturer and be listed to
ANSI / UL 1034.
E.3.5.15 Electromagnetic Locks. These lock designs provide reasonably high levels of force
resistance in high-traffic access-controlled areas. The use of electromagnetic locks must not alter the
requirement for fire-rated hardware or single-motion egress. Electromagnetic locks should meet ANSI/BHMA
A156.23 in the appropriate grade for the application and be listed toANSI/ UL 1034 for burglary-resistant
electric locks.
E.3.5.16 Delayed Egress Locks. Delayed egress locks were designed for use in retail
3
Circulation Explanation Report for PMM-AAA Proposals
Friday, October 23, 2009
Document # 730
applications and are valuable in many applications to provide reasonable security by operating on a delay with
an alarm in nonemergency situations. They can be installed only where permitted by code and must be released
instantly (without delay) by the fire alarm system in the event of emergency. They should meet ANSI/BHMA
A156.24 in the appropriate grade for the application and be listed as --Special Locking Arrangements, per
ANSI / UL 294 and ANSI / NFPA 101.
E.3.5.17 Electric Strikes. Electric strikes provide electric release via access control or
pushbutton interface for use with bored/cylindrical locks, mortise locks, or exit devices. Models
are available for use in both fail-safe and fail-secure situations. Fail-safe models cannot be used in high-rise
stairwell applications where codes require re-entry to every fourth floor in the event of a fire, because the doors
are fire-rated and the positive latching is lost in this mode. Fail-safe models can be used on non-fire-rated
traffic control doors. There are many varieties of electric strikes offering varying levels of protection against
forced entry. Electric strikes should be used only where the door frame or the surrounding wall structure is
sufficient to prohibit access to strike components or wiring. Electric strikes should meet ANSI/BHMA
A156.31 in the appropriate grade for the application and should be listed toANSI / UL 1034 for burglary-
resistant electric door strikes.
E.3.5.20 Hinges. Hinges or pivots are required for all swinging doors. Hinges other than
continuous hinges should be installed at intervals of every 30 in. (76.2 cm). Nonremovable pins (NRP) should
be used on hinges accessible from the outside (out-swinging doors). Various types of security studs are
available to prevent attack. They should meet ANSI/BHMA A156.1 or ANSI/BHMA A156.26 in the
appropriate grade for the application. Hinges for use in burglar alarm systems should be listed to ANSI /
UL634.
E.4.1.2.4.1 Perimeter Sensors. The most common points for perimeter sensing devices are
doors, windows, vents, and skylights. These openings can be protected, with devices intended to sense their
position, forcing, or breaking. If intrusion occurs through unprotected walls or ceilings, these devices can be
ineffective. Perimeter sensors should be listed to ANSI / UL 639.
E.4.1.2.4.1.1 Contact Switches. These devices are usually magnetic operated switches affixed to a door or
window in such a way that opening the door or window beyond a specific gap breaks a magnetic field, causing
the switch to trip (an alarm). High-security switches are normally balanced or biased magnetic switches.
Connectors and switches used in burglar alarms systems should be listed to ANSI / UL 634.
E.4.1.2.4.1.3 Screens. Openings such as vents, ducts, skylights, and similar openings can be alarmed by thin
wire filaments that signal an alarm if the screen is cut or broken. Often the wire filaments are placed in a frame
of wooden rods and require little maintenance. Linings and screens for use with burglar alarm systems should
be listed to UL 606.
E.4.1.2.4.1.5 Glass Breakage (Inertia) Sensing Device. This device is attached to a window or frame and
can detect glass breakage from single or multiple glass panels. This device requires --shock,? which is
generated during intrusion, to activate the alarm system, thereby opening the normally closed circuit of the
protective loop on the security system. Some shock sensors require a separate analyzer to function or utilize
the alarm system's protective loop voltage for power. Glass break detectors should be listed to ANSI / UL 639.
E.4.1.2.4.1.6 Lacing. Lacing can protect walls, doors, and safes against penetration. Lacing is a closely
woven pattern of metallic foil or fine brittle wire on the surface of the protected area. An intruder can enter
only by breaking the foil or wire. A panel over the lacing protects it from
accidental damage. Lacing equipment should be listed to UL 606.
E.4.1.2.4.2.1 Passive Infrared Detectors. A passive infrared detector is designed to detect the difference
between air temperature and mass temperature when an intruder enters its protected field of detection range.
This differential activates the initiating device. Passive infrared detectors should be listed to ANSI / UL 639.
E.4.1.2.4.2.2 Ultrasonic Detectors. Ultrasonic motion detectors generate a high frequency of
4
Circulation Explanation Report for PMM-AAA Proposals
Friday, October 23, 2009
Document # 730
sound that is out of the normal range of human hearing. An intruder disrupting the ultrasonic
wave pattern initiates the alarm. Because ultrasonic devices are prone to false alarms due to
excessive air currents or ultrasonic noise from mechanical equipment, their use in buildings is discouraged.
Ultrasonic detectors should be listed to ANSI / UL 639.
i d hi h f di
5

Вам также может понравиться