Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
> +
s +
=
mp
E
fs
E
ifd d
mp
E
elec
E l
mp
E
fs
E
ifd d
fs
E
elec
E l
trans
E
),
4
(
),
2
(
(2)
Fig. 6 Simulated Arrangement of a Commercial Building for PPLT
The mobile node when receives the transmitted energy, sink
node calculates the distance of itself upto the mobile node and
so, the coordinates of user are known. Similarly, GPS radiates
energy towards the user, on receiving the transmitted energy
the distance is calculated. In our simulated model, we assume
the message size being 64 bytes, free space attenuation
coefficient (E
fs
) being 10 pJ/bit/m
2
, multipath attenuation
coefficient (E
mp
) being 0.0013 pJ/bit/m4, electronic power
(E
elec
) being 50 nJ/bit, number of sink nodes being 10- one for
each floor, floor area be 100 m
2
.
Fig. 7 and fig. 8 shows the comparison of energy consumed
while localizing an object through Sink Nodes and GPS
respectively. Fig. 7 considers the movement of a person or
object on 10
th
floor where the sink node is placed at 0
th
position on x-axis, thus representing least energy at 0
th
position i.e. when the person is very close to the sink node. As
the person proceeds to the other corner of the building and the
distance increases then proportionally the transmission energy
also increases; however the receiving energy remains almost
constant.
Fig. 7 Energy consumption while calculating energy through sink node
Fig. 8 Energy consumption while calculating distance using GPS
In similar to fig. 7, fig. 8 considers the movement of a person
or object on 10th floor where the GPS node; representing the
aggregate position of the building under observation from the
Base Station end, is placed at certain average position on x-
axis, thus representing least energy at the middle position of
the building i.e. when the person is in contact with least
distance from the GPS node. As the person proceeds to the
other corners of the building i.e. the distance increases then
proportionally the transmission energy also increases;
however the receiving energy remains almost constant. In
similar to fig. 7, fig. 8 considers the movement of a person or
object on 10
th
floor where the GPS node; representing the
1
st
Floor
2
nd
Floor
3
rd
Floor
4
th
Floor
5
th
Floor
6
th
Floor
7
th
Floor
8
th
Floor
9
th
Floor
10
th
Floo
Mobile
SN GPS
Sink
Node
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume X Issue YMonth 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page 2517
aggregate position of the building under observation from the
Base Station end, is placed at certain average position on x-
axis, thus representing least energy at the middle position of
the building i.e. when the person is in contact with least
distance from the GPS node. As the person proceeds to the
other corners of the building i.e. the distance increases then
proportionally the transmission energy also increases;
however the receiving energy remains almost constant.
It is observed that localization using sink nodes as shown in
fig. 7 is more energy efficient technique as compared to
localizing an object using GPS technique; influencing the
need of hierarchical path for message transfer. Thus, PPLT
provides more accurate solution for localization using sink
nodes.
VI. CONCLUSION AND FUTURE WORK
Different application demands different granularity of the
location information. In this paper, we presented PPLT for
localization especially for indoor applications in WISENET. It
uses GPS and local coordinate system to provide exact
location of the object. This technique provide accurate and
energy efficient solution for localization in commercial areas
where all other approaches developed so far are unable to
provide energy efficient solution. In future, researchers can
consider increase in pace of mobile nodes, mobility of sink
nodes and cluster formation of various buildings and energy
efficient mechanism of PPLT for irregular shaped buildings.
REFERENCES
[1] Tilak, S., Kolar, V., Abu-Ghazaleh, N.B., Kang, K.D.: Dynamic
localization control for mobile sensor networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE
International Workshop on Strategies for Energy Efficiency in Ad Hoc and
Sensor Networks (2005).
[2] Esteves, J ., Carvalho, A., Couto, C.: Generalized geometric triangulation
algorithmfor mobile robot absolute self-localization (2003).
[3] Wang, X., Wang, Z., ODea, B.: A toa-based location algorithmreducing
the errors due to non-line-of-sight (nlos) propagation. IEEE Transactions on
Vehicular Technology 52(1), 112116 (2003).
[4] Eiman Elnahrawy, Xiaoyan Li and Richard P. Martin, The Limits of
Localization Using Signal Strength: A Comparative Study, in Proceedings of
IEEE SECON, pp. 406-414, Santa Clara,California, USA, October 2004.
[5]Andreas Savvides, Chih-Chieh Han, Mani B. Strivastava. Dynamic fine-
grained localization in Ad-Hoc networks of sensors.MobiCom(2001).
[6] N. Bulusu, J . Heidemann, and D. Estrin, GPS-less Low- Cost Outdoor
Localization for Very Small Devices, IEEE Personal Communication, (2000).
[7] T. He, C. Huang, B. Blum, J . Stankovic, and T. Abdelzaher, Range-Free
Localization Schemes for Large Scale Sensor Networks, In MobiCom03,
(2003).
[8] Radhika Nagpal, Howard Shrobe, and J onathan Bachrach, Organizing a
Global Coordinate System from Local Information on an Ad Hoc Sensor
Network, 2nd International Workshop on Information Processing in Sensor
Networks (IPSN), April (2003).
[9] Dragos Niculescu and Badri Nath, DV Based Positioning in Ad hoc
Networks, Kluwer J ournal of Telecommunication Systems. (2003).
[10] B. Hofmann-Wellenhof, H. Lichtenegger, and J . Collins, Global
Positioning System: Theory and Practice, Fourth Edition. Springer-Verlag,
(1997).
[11] Dragos Niculescu and Badri Nath. Ad Hoc Positioning System (APS)
Using AoA.IEEE InfoCom 2003).