Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
= +
= +
(1)
Where ( ) x t is A regions energy resources demand, ( ) y t is
B regions energy resource supply to A region. ( ) z t is the
energy resource import in A region. ( ) u t is the renewable
energy resources in A region. ,
i
a ,
i
b ,
i
c ,
i
d , M N are
positive constants. When the systems parameters are chosen
as follows:
1
0.09, a =
2
0.15, a =
1
0.06, b =
2
0.082, b =
3
0.07, b =
1
0.2, c =
2 3 1
0.5, 0.4, 0.1, c c d = = =
2
0.06, d =
3
0.08, d =
1.8, M = 1. N =
We can obtain three equilibrium
points: (0,0,0,0), O
1
S (1.75, -1.52, 0, 2.91) and
2
S (0.8, 0.669, -1.11, 1.33), which are unstable. Let initial
condition (0.82,0.29,0.48,0.1) and parameters are fixed as
above, a chaotic attractor is observed. A four-dimensional
energy resources chaotic attractor is shown in Fig1.
Fig.1. A four-dimensional energy resources chaotic
attractor: 3Dview( ) x y z .
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 4 Issue 8 August 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page 2535
III. PROBLEM FORMULATION AND SOME PRELIMINARIES
Let( , , , ) x y z u
- - - -
be the equilibrium point of system (1), by
using the following transformation:
1
, x x x
-
=
2
, x y y
-
=
3
, x z z
-
=
4
, x u u
-
= the
equilibrium point( , , , ) x y z u
- - - -
can be shifted to the origin:
( ), x Ax f x = +
(2)
where
1 2 3 4
[ , , , ],
T
x x x x x =
2 2 1
1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 3
( ) [ , , ,0],
T
a
f x x b x b x x c c x x
M
= +
1 2 2 3
3 1 3 2
1 2 1 2 3
1 2
2
(1 )
( 2 ) 0 ,
0 ( ) 0
0 0
x
a a a d
M
b N z x b b x b A
c c z c c x c
d d
-
- - -
- -
(
(
(
+ = (
(
(
(
the nonlinear system (2) with the control input can be
described as
( ) ( , ), x Ax f x u t x = + +
where ( , ) u t x is the control input. We can construct a hybrid
impulsive and switching controller
1 2
u u u = + for (2) as
follows:
1 1
1
( ) ( ) ( ),
k k
k
u t B x t l t
=
=
2 2
1
( ) ( ) ( ),
k k
k
u t B x t t t
=
=
(3)
where
1k
B and
2k
B are 4 4 constant matrices, ( ) is the
Dirac impulse. And ( ) 1
k
l t = as
1
,
k k
t t t
s <
otherwise ( ) 0
k
l t = with discontinuity points,
1 2
,
k
t t t < <
lim ,
k
k
t
=
0
0 t > is the initial time.
From (3),
1 1
( ) ( ),
k
u t B x t =
1
[ , ),
k k
t t t
= + + +
}
where 0 h > is sufficiently small. As 0 , h
+
this reduces to
2
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
k k
k k k
x t x t x t B x t
A = = , where
0
( ) lim ( )
k
k
h
x t x t h
+
= .
This implies that the controller
2
( ) u t has the effect of
suddenly changing the state of (2) at the points .
k
t Therefore,
2
( ) u t is an impulsive controller, and
1
( ) u t is a switching
controller.
Accordingly, with the hybrid impulsive and switching control
(3), the nonlinear system of (2) becomes a nonlinear hybrid
impulsive and switching system
1 1
2
0 0
( ) , [ , ),
( ), ,
( ) , 1,2...
k
k k k
k k
x Ax f x B x t t t
x B x t t t
x t x k
= + + e
A = =
= =
(4)
We can rewrite (4) in the form of
1
2
0 0
( ), [ , ),
( ), ,
( ) , 1,2...
k
k
i k k
k k
x A x f x t t t
x B x t t t
x t x k
= + e
A = =
= =
(5)
Where
1
.
k
i k
A A B = + The switching
signal { } : 1,2,.... , R m
+
which is represented
by{ }
k
i according to { }
1
[ , ) 1,2,.... ,
k k k
t t i m
e is a piecewise
constant function. Obviously, system (5) has m different
modes.
Assumption 1. Considering the actual meaning of model (1),
( ), x t ( ), y t ( ), z t ( ) u t are bounded, so let
T
x x L s , where L
is positive constant,
1 2 3 4
[ , , , ]
T
x x x x x = .
Lemma 1. If
n n
P R
e is a symmetric and positive definite
matrix,
n n
Q R
e is asymmetric matrix, then
1 1
min max
( ) ( ) ,
T T T
P Q x Px x Qx P Q x Px
s s .
n
x R e
IV. MAIN RESULTS
Theorem. Assume that Assumption 1 holds, there exist
symmetric and positive definite matrices ,
ik
P 0 > is a
constant, and the nonlinear impulsive and switching system (5)
satisfies
( )
1 1
1 1 0 0
1 1
ln( ) ( ) ( ) ( , ) ,
k k
i i i i k k
i i
b t t b t t t t t t
= =
+ + s s
1
[ , )
k k
t t t
e . (6)
( ) ( )
max 2 2
,
T
k k k
I B I B
(
+ + s
1,2... k = (7)
where
( ) ( )
( )
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2
1 1
max max
min
9
4 4
,
k i k k k k k k k
k
T T
k i i i i i i i
i
a
c c
L b
M
b P A P P A P P P
P
| |
+ + |
|
\ .
(
= + + +
`
)
{ }
2
1
max ,
k
k
i
i m
s s
=
( )
( )
max
min
k
k
k
i
i
i
P
P
= , { } 1,2,..., ,
k
i m e
( )
max
, ( )
min
donate the maximum and minimum
eigenvalues of the matrix, respectively. Then the origin of the
nonlinear impulsive and switching system (5) is exponentially
stable.
Proof. Construct the switched Lyapunov function in the form
of
,
k k
T
i i
V x P x = { } 1,2,..., .
k
i m e (8)
The total derivative of ,
k
i
V with respect to (5), is
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 4 Issue 8 August 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page 2536
( )
2 .
k k k i k k k k k
T T T T T
i i i i i i i
V x P x x P x x A P P A x f P x = + = + +
Notice that
2
k k k
T T T T
i i i
f P x f f x P P x s + ,
2 2 1
1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 3
( ) [ , , ,0] .
T
a
f x x b x b x x c c x x
M
= +
Let
2 1
1 1
,
a
g x
M
=
2
2 3 1 3 1 3
, g b x b x x = +
3 1 2 1 3
, g c c x x =
4
0. g =
We have
2 1
1
1 1
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 2 3 4 1 3
,
a
x
g a
M
M x x x x x x
s s
+ + + +
( )
2 2
3 1 3 1 3 1 3 1
2
3 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
1 2 3 4 1 3 1 3
3
,
2
b x x x b x x x
g
b
x x x x x x x x
+
s s s
+ + + + +
3 1 2 1 3 1 2
2 2 2 2 2 2
1 2 3 4 1 3
,
2
g c c x x c c
x x x x x x
s s
+ + + +
2
2
2 2 2 2 2 1
1 1 2 3 4 2
( ) ,
a
g x x x x
M
s + + +
2
2 2 2 2 2 2
2 1 2 3 4 3
9
( ) ,
4
g x x x x b s + + +
2 2
2
2 2 2 2 2 1 2
3 1 2 3 4
( ) .
4
c c
g x x x x s + + +
So
( )
1
2
2 2
2
2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 1 2
1 2 3 4 3 1 2 3 4 2
9
4 4
T
a
c c
f f g g g g b x x x x
M
| |
= + + + s + + + + + |
|
\ .
.
From assumption 1, it follows that
( )
1
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2 2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2
min
9
4 4
9
.
4 4
k
k
T T T
i
i
a
c c
L b
M a
c c
f f L b x x x P x
M P
| |
+ + |
|
| |
\ .
s + + s |
|
\ .
Then
( )
( )
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2
1
max
min
9
4 4
2 .
k k k k k k k
k
T T T T T T
i i i i i i i
i
a c c
L b
M
f P x f f x P P x P P P x P x
P
( | |
+ + ( |
|
(
\ .
s + s +
(
(
(
This implies that
( )
( ) ( )
( )
( ) ( )
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2
1 1
max max
min
2
9
4 4
.
k i k k k k k
k i k k k k k k k k
k
T T T
i i i i i
T T
i i i i i i i i
i
V x A P P A x f P x
a
c c
L b
M
P A P P A P P P V x t
P
= + +
| |
+ + |
|
\ .
(
s + + +
`
)
It leads to
( ) ( ) ( ( )) ,
k k
i k i
V x t b V x t s
1
[ , ),
k k
t t t
e
which implies that
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1
exp ,
k k
i i k k k
V x t V x t b t t
s (
1
[ , ).
k k
t t t
e (9)
Substituting (10) into (11) leads to
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
min
max 1 1 1
exp ,
k k
k
T
i i
T
i k k k k
P x t x t V x t
P x t x t b t t
s
s (
and
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1 1
exp ,
T T
k k k k
x t x t x t x t b t t
s (
1
[ , ),
k k
t t t
e
On the other hand, from (5), it follows that,
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
2 2
T
T
T
k k k k
x t x t x t I B I B x t
= + +
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
max 2 2
T
T
k k k k
I B I B x t x t
(
s + +
( ) ( )
,
T
k k k
x t x t
s
where 0,
k
> 1,2,... k =
For
0 1
[ , ), t t t e
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
0 0 1 0
exp ,
T T
x t x t x t x t b t t s (
which leads to
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1 0 0 1 1 0
exp ,
T T
x t x t x t x t b t t
s (
and
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1 1 1 1 1 0 0 1 1 0
exp .
T T T
x t x t x t x t x t x t b t t
s s (
Similarly, for
1 2
[ , ), t t t e
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
1 1 2 1
2
1 0 0 1 1 0 2 1
exp
exp .
T T
T
x t x t x t x t b t t
x t x t b t t b t t
s (
s + (
In general, for
1
[ , ),
k k
t t t
e 1,2,... k =
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
0 0 1 2 1 1 1 0
exp
T T k
k
x t x t x t x t b t t
s
,
( ) ( )
2 2 1 1
.
k k
b t t b t t
+ + (
(10)
Noticing (6), it follows from (10) that
( ) ( ) ( ) ( ) ( )
0 0 0 0
exp , ,
T T
x t x t x t x t t t s (
0
, t t >
which implies the origin of the nonlinear impulsive and
switching system (5) is exponentially stable.
Remark 1. In inequality (6),
1
1
ln( )
k
i
i
is impulsive effect,
1
1 1
1
( ) ( )
k
i i i k k
i
b t t b t t
=
+
is switching effect.
Remark 2. When
0
lim ( , ) ,
t
t t
+
= implies the origin of the
nonlinear impulsive and switching system (5) is
asymptotically stable.
V. NUMERICAL SIMULATIONS
Example. We prove that the equilibrium point
1
S (1.75, -1.52, 0, 2.91) of the system (1) is stable under the
impulsive and switching control.
Let
1
, x x x
-
=
2
, x y y
-
=
3
, x z z
-
=
4
, x u u
-
= then
we can rewrite (1) as
( ), x Ax f x = +
(11)
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 4 Issue 8 August 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page 2537
where
1 2 2 3
3 1 3 2
1 2 1 2 3
1 2
2
(1 )
( 2 ) 0
0 ( ) 0
0 0
x
a a a d
M
b N z x b b x b A
c c z c c x c
d d
-
- - -
- -
(
(
(
+ = (
(
(
(
,
2 2 1
1 3 1 3 1 3 1 2 1 3
( ) [ , , ,0]
T
a
f x x b x b x x c c x x
M
= + ,
1
( , , , ) S (1.75, -1.52, 0, 2.91) x y z u
- - - -
= ,and the values of
, , , , ,
i i i i
a b c d M N are the same as the values in Section 2.
Correspondingly, system (11) with the impulsive and
switching control can be written as
1
2
0 0
( ), [ , ),
( ), ,
( ) , 1,2...
k
k
i k k
k k
x A x f x t t t
x B x t t t
x t x k
= + e
A = =
= =
(12)
where
1
,
k
i k
A A B = +
( )
11 2 2 3
3 22 3 2
1
1 2 33
1 44
( 2 ) 0
0 0
0 0
k
a a a d
b N z x a b x b
B
c c z a
d a
- - -
-
(
(
+
(
(
(
,
2
{ 1, 2,0,0}
k
B diag ,
and
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
11 1 3 2
2 9
1 2 ,
2 4 4
a
c c x L
a a b
M M
-
| |
| |
= + + |
|
|
\ .
\ .
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
22 1 3 2
9
3 ,
2 4 4
a
c c L
a b b
M
| |
= + + |
|
\ .
( )
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
33 1 2 3 3 2
9
4 ,
2 4 4
a
c c L
a c c x c b
M
-
| |
= + + |
|
\ .
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
44 2 3 2
9
5 .
2 4 4
a
c c L
a d b
M
| |
= + + |
|
\ .
Let {1,1,1,1}
k
i
P diag = , which is symmetric and positive
definite, it leads to 1. =
By calculating, we have ( ) ( )
max 2 2
1,
T
k k
I B I B
(
+ +
then
let 1,
k
it implies that ( )
1
1
ln 0.
k
i
i
Notice that
( ) ( )
1
max max
2 ,
k i k k k k k
T
i i i i i
P A P P A A
(
+ =
( )
1
1
2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2 2
2 2
2 1 2
3 2
min
9
4 4
9
,
4 4
k
i
a
c c
L b
M a
c c
L b
M
P
| |
+ + |
|
| |
\ .
= + + |
|
\ .
( )
1
max
1.
k k k
T
i i i
P P P
= Then 3.
k
b
By letting ( ) ( )
0 0
, 3 , t t t t = 3, = we have
( )
1 1
1 1
1 1
1
1 1 0
1
ln( ) ( ) ( )
( ) ( ) , .
k k
i i i i k k
i i
k
i i i k k
i
b t t b t t
b t t b t t t t
= =
=
+ +
= + =
From Theorem, the origin of the nonlinear impulsive and
switching system (12) is exponentially stable, i.e. the
equilibrium point
1
S (1.75, -1.52, 0, 2.91) of (1) is
exponentially stable.
Fig2 The time evolution of the system (12).
Choosing the values of , , , , ,
i i i i
a b c d M N are the same as the
values in Section 2, the initial states of the controlled system
(14) are selected as(1, 0.4, 2, 0.5) , and the behaviors of the
states
1 2 3 4
( , , , ) x x x x of the controlled chaotic system (14) with
time are displayed in Fig. 2.
VI. CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, we have investigated the exponential stability
of the four-dimensional energy resources supply-demand
system under the impulsive and switching control. Based on
the theory of impulsive, some sufficient conditions have been
presented to guarantee the exponential stability. Finally, the
example with its simulation has been given to demonstrate the
effectiveness of the theory results.
ACKNOWLEDGMENT
This research is funded by Supported by National by the
National Nature Science Foundation of China (No. 71073071,
71273119), the Key Program of Social Science Foundation of
Jiangsu Provincial Department of Education (No. 2010-2-10)
and the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu
Higher Education Institutions.
REFERENCES
[1] M. Sun, Q. Jia, and L.X. Tian, A new four-dimensional
energy resources system and its linear feedback control,
Chaos Solitons and Fractals, vol.39, no.1, pp.101-108,
2009.
[2] M. Barkhordari Yazdi, M.R. Jahed-Motlagh, S.A. Attia,
and J. Raisch, Modal exact linearization of a class of
second-order switched nonlinear systems, Nonlinear
International Journal of Computer Trends and Technology (IJCTT) volume 4 Issue 8 August 2013
ISSN: 2231-2803 http://www.ijcttjournal.org Page 2538
Analysis: Real World Applications, vol.11, no.4,
pp.22432252, 2010.
[3] R. Shorten, F.Wirth, O. Mason, K.Wulff, and C. King,
Stability criteria for switched and hybrid systems,
SIAM Rev, vol.49, no.4, pp.545-592, 2007.
[4] R. Goebel, R.G Sanfelice, and A. R. Teel, Hybrid
Dynamical Systems, IEEE Control Systems, vol.29,
no.2, pp28-93, 2002.
[5] G. Davrazos and N.T. Koussoulas, A review of stability
results for switched and hybrid systems, in: Proc. of 9th
Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation,
2001.
[6] Z.H. Guan, D. Hill, and X. Shen, On hybrid impulsive
and switching systems and application to nonlinear
control, IEEE Trans. Autom. Control vol.50, no.7
pp.1058-1062, 2005.
[7] D. Liberzon and A.S. Morse, Basic problems in
stability and design of switched systems, IEEE Control
System. Mag, vol.19, no.5, pp.59-70, 1999.
[8] D. Bainov and P. Simeonov, Systems with Impulse
Effect: Stability, Theory and Applications, Halsted
Press, New York, 1989.
[9] V. Lakshmikantham, D. Bainov, and P. Simeonov,
Theory of Impulsive Differential Equations, World
Scientific, Singapore, 1989.
[10] Z. Li, Y. Soh, and C.Wen, Switched and Impulsive
Systems Analysis, Design, and Applications, Springer-
Verlag, Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.
[11] X.Z. Liu and P. Stechlinski, Pulse and constant control
schemes for epidemic models with seasonality,
Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications, vol.12,
pp.931946, 2011.
[12] F.F. Li and J.T. Sun, Stability analysis of a reduced
model of the lac operon under impulsive and switching
control, Nonlinear Analysis: Real World Applications
vol.12,pp.12641277,2011.