Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
ASKING QUESTION -> UNDERSTANDING QUESTION -> RETRIEVING INFORMATION -> REPORTING
ANSWER
1. Understanding of questions
A. Information Processing
– Is respondent being asked to think about actual experience or hypothetical situations?
1. Retrieving/constructing responses
– Memory
– Mental capacity
– Qualified to answer **
Memory
– If the time frame is from jan.1 –dec.31 (what crime have you been a victim of)
– Forward telescoping – talking about events that occurred before Jan. 1 acting like they did
happen after jan1
– Keep time period as small as possible for accuracy or relating it to other events (it
occurred before my birthday , after my anniversary
Mental capacity
Qualified to answer**
– How old were you when you started to walk? How old were you when you didn’t need
diapers? Wouldn’t ask the person who experienced them
1. Reporting answer
– Social and conversational norms (e.g. social desirability- many will not disclose that they
might think that would make them look bad)
– Confidentially and anonymity (helps get a more accurate answer without worrying about
social desirability, and insurance like a consent form)
TYPES OF SURVEYS
Interviews - surveyor asks you questions and they write down your answer
QUESTIONNAIRES
Mailed surveys
a. Cover letter
– Describes the study
– Has to get people interested in participating in the study
Instructions
– Who’s doing it
– Inducements to participate (awards, token of appreciation, being entered into draws)
– Characteristic of respondents (group member/non member, age, gender, ethnicity, social
class)
– Mailing date
– Follow-up procedures (reminder letter, additional letter and fresh questionnaire, telephone
call!!!) got to do a lot of work to get the most and best responses possible
– Confidentiality/anonymity
INTERVIEW SCHEDULES
Telephone Surveys
Cost
Response rates
Time to answer
– Phone interview have to ask questions that really shouldn’t take a lot of time, tied to
response rates . Very concise questions (because it’s easier to terminate interview
– face to face/questionnaire more lengthy amount of time to answer questions, different
questions
Complex questions
– higher in face to face and phone because of the way the questions are formatted as
opposed to questionnaire where it’s very strict
Educational bias
– Quality and completeness of answers is closely tied to the level of education the person
has.
– In questionnaire the people who can read and write and understand correctly will give
much better responses
– In face to face/phone, you can get help whereas in questionnaires you really can’t
Safety
|----------------------------------------- |----------------------------------------- |
Question Structured
a) No b) Yes
Never 1
1 or 2 times 2
3 or 4 times 3
5 or more times 4
Might not be enough precision saying 5, (some might use it 50-100 times a year)
1. Open ended questions ask respondents to supply their own responses and in some cases
to record his/her responses
e.g. how often have you used marijuana in the past year?
____________________________________________________________
Closed Open
Classifying/coding No Yes
responses
– A B C D on whether you smoked pot vs. Open ended where you can talk about it
– Based on responses you can see in their answers that the answers don’t make sense since
they’re getting lazy creating a pattern
– Ask question and let them answer themselves opposed to closed ended abcd
Education bias
Classifying/coding bias
– If you ask someone to describe in an open ended question what work you do for pay, got
to be required to code all the responses to numerical values to analyze the numbers. The
responses can vary greatly by job and could make it really hard to code everything
Contingency questions
1. No- skip to Q 5
2. Yes- go to next question
3. How many times?
1 or 2 times 1
3 or 4 times 2
5 or more times 3
Matrix questions
– A set of closed ended questions that have the same response categories
How afraid are you that someone will.... 1 not at all, 2 moderately, 3 extremely
Etc.
Get as much information as you can in the major research section before people start bailing
Question patterning
Would you say that the police in Canada do a good job, average job, or a poor job? (scope is all
of Canada)
Would you say that police in your city do a good job? (scope is the city)
Would you say that police in your neighbourhood do a good job? (scope is neighbourhood)
– One of the three (3) major ways of measuring delinquent and criminal involvement
– Basic approach is to ask individuals about disreputable behaviour
– First published findings of self report surveys in mind 1940’s
– James Short and Ivan Nye (1957) carry out first methodologically sophisticated survey
○ Used scale construction, assessed measurement reliability and validity, probability
sampling
○ Multi level scales
***Early studies show that almost everyone as an adult has at some time committed a very
serious act
*** the early studies also assumed that the class/crime relationship doesn’t exist
Limitations
Studies in 1970’s and onwards have measured other areas of an individual’s life (etiological
factors, the study of causal connections) which permit theory testing/development
Test results indicate major self report measures have acceptable reliability
Q1 drink alcohol, Q2 smoke Cig ,Q3 drop acid (lsd), Q4 use inhalants
Split them into 2 questions in order to see if they’re consistent, split half technique (if they’re
high here, they should be high there too)
Internal consistency- To see how each question relates to every other question
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4
Q1 ---------------------
--------
Q2 -------------------------
----
Q3 -------------------------
----
Q4 -------------------------
----
***there appears to be substantial underreporting , people don’t always tell the truth
Test results indicate major self report measure have acceptable validity/accuracy
– Essentially the respondent reads and questions and enters responses into computer
– Convince them that it’ll be completely confidential
Victimization surveys
– First major victim surveys undertaken in the late 1960’s in the US- now carried out in
many countries, including Canada
– 1966-1967 large scale victim surveys started taking place in US
○ Canadian urban victimization survey 1981 (URBAN survey, all participants in 1 of 8
countries in Canada)
○ General social survey 1988, 1993, 1999, 2004 (5 year increments)
○ Violence against women survey 1993
** All done by statistics Canada, done by telephone (CATI), excludes territories
–
– Like self report offender surveys, victim surveys attempt to measure crime events
reported and not reported to the police (dark figure)
– Historically, have provided more detailed info (info about victim, offender, circumstances
surrounding event) than UCR data – but this has changed since late 1980s
– UCR data criticized for giving very limited data about crime ( # of homicides, charges,
males/females etc) and are monthly totals (aggregate data) , don’t know if people are
done more than one offences. Very little information relating to the offender
– Now asked more (age of offender, were the people involved drinking, circumstances of
situation, etc)
Victim surveys have led to creation of new victim-centered theories (routine activities, lifestyle,
opportunity, rational choice, repeat victimization)