Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
STATE OF GEORGIA
SANDRA HICKS,
d\b\a THE HICKS LAW FIRM,
Plaintiff CIVIL CASE NO. 06A44151
JAMES B. STEGEMAN,
Defendant
COMES NOW, James B. Stegeman Defendant in the above listed action and
files his Brief in Support of Motion to Recuse and Disqualify Judge Barbara J
Mobley. In the following paragraphs, Defendant shows the grounds for which he
January 20, 2006 Sandra Hicks, doing business as the Hicks Law Firm, filed
this civil action against Defendant. Summons and Complaint was served upon
Defendant January 25, 2006. Defendant timely filed Verified Answer and
Change of Venue with Proposed Orders. September 15, 2006 the Judge signed the
Order for Jury Trial. October 3, 2006 Defendant put in for Leave of Absence for
Medical reasons, with a Doctor’s Affidavit attached thereto; for the dates:
October 16th through November 13th. November 2, 2006 the Judge Granted
The Court set a Pre-Trial Conference hearing for January 10, 2007; January
11, 2007 the Court set a Motions hearing for March 07, 2007. February 9, 2007,
the Notice of hearing sent to Attorney David Whitman was returned to the Court
from the Post office as undeliverable. February 12, 2007 the Judge signed
David Whitman filed a conflict for the hearing March 07, 2007. The
evening before the hearing, Defendant called the Court and was told the conflict
had not been resolved, and the hearing would be rescheduled. The hearing was
apparently held without the defendant; all of his pending motions, although no
responsive objections had been filed, were dismissed because defendant did not
appear at the hearing, they were filed in the record on March 26, 2007. March 20,
2007 Defendant filed Motion to Enforce the Court Order on Pre-Trial conference,
April 04, 2007 Defendant filed Motion to Set aside the Order dismissing his
2
Motions. Although the Plaintiff did not Object to the Motions to Set Aside Rulings
there has been Ruling through today’s date of November 13, 2009, one (1) year
February 28, 2008 the Court gave the file to the law clerk to review, the file
June 2008 Defendant filed Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law. ; and
Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law, although not Objected to by Plaintiff, has
never been ruled on, one (1) year and five (5) months later, as of today’s date of
Hearing. Again, just as last time, there was no Order concerning the Pre-Trial
Order that the Court expects to be filed at the Hearing included with defendant’s
notice.
There are very few Uniform State Court Rules that are different from
Uniform Superior Court Rules, the Rules concerning filing and responding to
Nowhere does it state that a Judge can forego Ruling on Motions for either
O.C.G.A. §15-6-21
(b) “In all counties … it shall be the duty of the judge of the
state court, …within 90 days…motions of any nature.”
(c) “When …so decided, …the duty of the judge… to notify…”
(d) “If any judge fails or refuses, …or if any judge repeatedly
or persistently fails or refuses to decide the various motions,
demurrers, and injunctions coming before him …such conduct
shall be grounds for impeachment and the penalty therefor
shall be his removal from office.”
been granted. There is no logical explanation as to why Defendant was not Granted
4
Plaintiff did not respond. The proper procedure at the time defendant filed a prima
facie Verified Answer and Counter, would have been to rebut with evidence.
"In rebutting this prima facie case, an adverse party may not rest
upon the mere allegations or denials … must set forth specific
facts showing that there is a genuine issue for trial."
(Punctuation omitted.) Entertainment Sales Co. v. SNK, Inc.,
232 Ga. App. 669-670 (502 SE2d 263) (1998).
he had a Constitutional Right to, was the victim of conspiracy, fraud, and theft by
crimes against him to the authorities, and she refused. She told him to do it
himself, knowing that when a party is represented by legal counsel, neither the
District Attorney, nor the Solicitor General will pay attention to what the
individual is showing and telling them. The DA or Solicitor asks why the attorney
is not presenting the evidence; discounting anything told them. Just as the GBI
will not get involved unless law enforcement advises them of a problem.
April 22, 2003 when Probate Court appointed a Temp. Administrator of the
legal counsel did nothing, although she had previously shaken Defendant’s hand
and told him the whole matter was over. The Temp. Administrator and his
attorney, committed perjury, subornation perjury, and fraud upon the court when
they caused to be filed Petition to Probate a new Will Probate Court. They
knowingly, willingly, wantonly, and maliciously lied when claiming: “no other
Wills”, and “the nephew and his brother are estranged from the deceased” and
“the DeKalb County DA’s office are currently investigating Felony theft by taking
of any investigation ever having taken place, and there was a Motion in Limine
6
(previously filed in the action at bar) in the Superior Court action in which attorney
Pattie Williams said she had spoken to the DA and there were no plans to ever
investigate Mr. Stegeman. Mr. Lillig knowingly, willingly, wantonly made the
statements, he is guilty of perjury and fraud upon the Court to obtain a Ruling in
his favor.
Because there were two Wills, the legitimate one yet to be decided, Lillig
had no right to be named Temp. Administrator, yet he had obtained the Bond
before Petitioning the Court for the appointment, and committed perjury and fraud
in the Petition; and Plaintiff did nothing about it, failed to act, failed to protect
7
“A judgment of a probate court (formerly court of ordinary) granting
permanent letters of administration to one who is not entitled to
administration may be set aside in a direct proceeding in equity,
instituted by an heir at law, on the ground that the application shows
on its face that the court has no jurisdiction and yet proceeds to
judgment, or on the ground that the applicant falsely and
fraudulently represented in his application that the facts were such as
to entitle him to appointment.” See Wallace v. Wallace, 142 Ga. 408
(2) (83 SE 113); Stanley v. Metts, 169 Ga. 101 (1) (149 SE 786);
Brown v. Parks, 169 Ga. 712 (1) (151 SE 340); Jackson v. Jackson,
179 Ga. 696 (177 SE 591); Bowers v. Dolen, 187 Ga. 653 (2) (1
SE2d 784); Watson v. Watson, 208 Ga. 512, 515 (1) (67 SE2d 704);
Toombs v. Hilliard, 209 Ga. 755 (1) (75 SE2d 801); Smith v. Smith,
230 Ga. 616 (3) (198 SE2d 307).”
“His petition showed on its face that he was not entitled to the
appointment, and it was a fraud in law to obtain the appointment.”
Philips v. Gladney, 234 Ga. 399 (216 SE2d 297)(1975).
Petitioner’s attorney assured him that she had no idea of how the appointment was
obtained with two wills and a caveat filed. One would have to be quite
unintelligent not to see that Plaintiff was conspiring with the opposition and did not
In RE: Law Suits of Anthony J. Carter (two cases) 235 Ga. App.
551, 510 S.E.2d 91, (1998).
at [31]: "Both the Georgia and United States Constitutions
prohibit the state from depriving `any person of life, liberty, or
property, without due process of law.' United States Const.,
amend. XIV, sec. 1; see also Ga. Const., [Art. I, Sec. I, Par. I].
8
The fundamental idea of due process is notice and an opportunity
to be heard." *fn14 As stated in Citizens &c. Bank v. Maddox,
*fn14 "[t]he benefit of notice and a hearing before judgment is
not a matter of grace, but is one of right." "A party's cause of
action is a property interest that cannot be denied without due
process. (Cit.)" *fn14
at [54]: “Howard v. Sharpe, supra at 772 (1), citing three
decisions of the United States Supreme Court. Although
Howard applied federal constitutional law, so fundamental a
concept would likewise be inherent in the state constitution's
guarantee of due process.”
upon the Courts and it’s Judges to honor their Oath of Office; abide by, uphold,
and honor The State of Georgia Constitution and The Constitution of the United
States; to protect his Civil and Constitutional Rights; to ensure that he is treated
fairly; and to guarantee that his case will go before a fair and impartial tribunal.
has been subjected numerous times to being named a defendant in cases where
creditors are seeking to recover from Defendants Aunt’s Estate. Plaintiff failed to
file the Memorandum of Understanding that was supposed to have ended the
9
Superior Court action, after Defendant upheld his part of the agreement. Plaintiff
then walked away from the case before it’s conclusion, and without filing the
Defendant to make an agreement, then walked away with actual knowledge the
Memorandum would never be honored by the opposing party, that the agreement
was merely a fraudulent act meant to mislead and harm Defendant, which is what
happened.
CONCLUSION
Defendant in this matter has shown beyond doubt that he owes nothing to
Plaintiff has failed to rebut or dispute anything Defendant has stated, or his
Law in his favor, Granting the Relief requested in the Verified Answers and
Counterclaim.
The Judge’s failure and refusal to act and Rule on Defendant’s Motions is
Grant Defendant’s Motion for Judgment as a Matter of Law and the Relief he has
requested in the Verified Answers and Counterclaim; she should Recuse herself.
10
The Judge has shown that she is bias/prejudice against Defendant by refusing to
Rule on his Motions, knowing that she has only 90 days to Rule. Defendant cannot
Defendant demands either Judgment in his favor with the relief he requested,
or Recusal.
By: ___________________________
JAMES B. STEGEMAN, Pro Se
821 Sheppard Rd
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
(404) 300-9782
_______________________
NOTARY PUBLIC
11
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I Certify that I have this 13th day of November, 2009 served a true and correct copy
of the foregoing Brief in Support of Motion to Recuse and Disqualify Judge
Barbara J. Mobley upon the Plaintiff in this action, through the attorney on file, by
causing to be deposited with USPS, First Class Mail, proper postage affixed and
addressed as follows:
____________________________
JAMES B. STEGMEMAN, Pro Se
821 Sheppard Road
Stone Mountain, GA 30083
(404) 300-9782
12