Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 3

Uppercase Truth

November 17, 2009

There used to be a time when I never thought I could have learned anything from a
Catholic.
Perhaps due to the fact that the sample of “Christianity” I had witnessed in my hometown
Catholic church drove me into atheism by the age of 10.
But then I came across the writings of the Franciscan Richard Rohr, and found out that
God seems to have made exceptions to every rule, and that you can even learn something
from a Catholic.
Likewise, I was not expecting any mind-blowing experiences to come out of the atheist
camp since my latest experiences with countless comments of the defenders of disbelief
on our Youtube channels, or having read what some of their supposedly brightest lights
like Richard Dawkins or the Zeitgeist people have to say.
But then again, you never know when God knocks on your door with a surprise, ready to
push over all your carefully construed clichés and mental drawers we keep our fellow
humans in.
I have found an atheist who is probably a better Christian than I.
And very much unlike most of his fellow unbelievers, he comes forward as a defender of
those from the other side or camp of the opposition and writes a book called, “An Atheist
Defends Religion: Why Humanity is Better Off with Religion Than Without It.”
If I ever would have had and lost anything like it, I would have said “Bruce Sheiman has
restored my faith in humanity.” But since I have long ago decided to place my trust in
Someone more trustworthy than my own kind, at least I can say, Bruce, thanks for
making my day! – And for reminding me of how a real Christian is supposed to act,
seeing the good in the folks on the “other side” and coming forward to put in a good word
for them, which is probably a closer version of “loving your enemies” than what the
majority of Christendom is coming up with nowadays.
In his book, Bruce Sheiman reminds his readers that while Christianity may not have a
snow-white record (as we’re constantly being reminded by those who would love to blast
Christianity to hell for its crusades and other crimes of history both past and present),
there are nonetheless a lot of decent Christian (or otherwise religious) folks who are
doing a lot of good to make this world a better place (and if you ever tried your hand at it,
you may know just how tough that attempt can be, especially in the light of the fact that
most folks will never give you the credit for it, no matter what you do – just because
you’re a believer).
Regardless of those culprits and fakes who have abused religion as a cloak for their less
than noble purposes (including in very recent history, such as the previous US
administration – without saying the present is any better), as a sum, the impact of (true)
religion on the world was a good one, even if many folks may not realize it.
“Historians cannot identify any other cultural force as robust as religion that could have
carried civilization along.”
Mostly, though, he points out something that strikes me as purely divine genius, namely
that in our drive to discover what he terms “lowercase truth”–facts and knowledge–we
have sacrificed “uppercase truth”–meaning and purpose.
In other words, figuring out all the scientific little details about how the universe works
may be all fine and good, but not really replace our need for a higher purpose in life than
your usual “survival of the fittest” scheme that’s slowly turning our carefully analyzed
and dissected planet into living hell for more and more people each day.
He observes that our minds are called to something more than a relative truth…and if
moral imperatives do not depend on God then they are not absolute and remain relative. –
In other words, we’re not really good at kidding ourselves into accepting any counterfeit,
fake “goodness” or standard we’re supposed to live by or strive for. The human souls is
desperate to find, and unready to settle for anything less than the Real Thing in the long
run.
Pointing out some of the moral advantages of those Christians and believers who actually
did get the point of what their religion’s founder had intended, including their quality to
respect humans as created in the image of God instead of just another hoard of highly
mutated two-legged mammals who must constantly prove to each other who is the
strongest, he contends that the world is actually not any worse off because of religion.
One might argue in favor of atheists as civilized and courteous as Mr. Sheiman, that in
the light of Jesus’ recommendation to judge a tree by its fruits that what He would truly
consider a person following in His footsteps and worthy of His commendation, regardless
of which camp he professes to belong to (since we live in a world of pretenders, after all),
one way to find out who truly is a “Christian” or a “good person” one would have to
simply look at the way they treat their fellowmen.
And in this aspect, Bruce Sheiman has proven himself worthy of a higher commendation
than I would be able to presently grant the majority of my fellow believers, and awakens
in me the desire that there were more folks like him around, regardless of whether they
share my belief or not.
Atheists who don’t persecute me for my faith make for a truly a refreshing change,
including from those fellow-believers who persecute me for the differences in my belief
system from theirs.
Folks capable of seeing the good in people, even in those from the opposing camp, and
even capable of defending them before the world, in my opinion are a greater sample of
the kind of love Christ intended for us to live and practice than the attempt to press every-
or anyone into our same molds.
I’ve said before that maybe Gandhi, being a Hindu, proved himself a better Christian by
His actions than probably most Christians during his life-time. Perhaps Mr. Sheiman,
being an atheist (though allegedly considering himself an “aspiring theist”), by his
gesture, is putting forth a better Christian example than many of those who claim that
label for themselves.
We’ve all heard the line “With friends like that, who needs enemies?” Well, with
“enemies” like him, we would all soon have a lot more friends.
I have certainly learned something from him, and have been reminded of the fact that the
One I look up to as my personal Guide and Master also stood out by bridging the gap
between enemy camps (such as Jews and Romans), and it makes me long for that quality
that His early followers stood out for, which ultimately enabled them to conquer the
Roman empire with meekness and love.
I’m only afraid that Bruce might encounter the same type of rejection from the hardliners
of his own camp that Jesus had to face from the religious hardliners of His day for
showing sympathy to the Romans and preaching “Love your enemies.”
Perhaps the statement “Blessed are they who are being persecuted for righteousness’
sake” can also apply to atheists. The truth is the truth, no matter who preaches it. And in
this case, the truth award of the day goes to Bruce…
Related articles:
http://newsweek.washingtonpost.com/onfaith/guestvoices/2009/09/an_atheist_defends_th
e_value_of_religion.html
http://www.zenit.org/article-27550?l=english

Вам также может понравиться