Jillian Myers

Web Site Evaluation Form

URL: http://www.primarygames.com,b
1) Website Title: Two minute Warning /flashcards/multiplication/start.htm
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Subject/topic:
Evaluator: Jillian Myers Date: 10/30/09

Instruction:
Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being
the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

CRITERIA RATING
CONTENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. x
2 Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. x
3 Learning activities are student-centered. x
4 Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. x
5 Content information is accurate and bias free.
6 Content information is reliable. X
7 Content information is up to date. X
8 Content information is grade/age appropriate. X
9 Grammar and spelling are accurate. X
10 Website information complies with copyright laws. X
11 Bibliographic references are provided. X
12 Website provides high-level user interactivity. X
Subtotal: 45/60 points
DESIGN 5 4 3 2 1
13 Overall screen display is visually pleasing. X
14 Text is legible. X
15 Multimedia enhances learning. X
16 Multimedia elements work properly. X
Subtotal: 20/20 points
NAVIGATION 5 4 3 2 1
17 All links work properly. X
18 All links are clearly labeled. X
19 A site map is provided. x
20 Website is easy to navigate. X
Subtotal: 18/20 points
GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): 63/100 points

Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2)
make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3)
provide a rationale to support your recommendation.

.
 Web Site Evaluation Form
1) Website Title: Discovery Education URL:
Puzzlemaker http://puzzlemaker.discoveryeducation.com/
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Subject/topic:
Evaluator: Jillian Myers Date: 10/30/09

Instruction:
Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being
the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

CRITERIA RATING
CONTENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. x
2 Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. x
3 Learning activities are student-centered. x
4 Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. x
5 Content information is accurate and bias free. x
6 Content information is reliable. x
7 Content information is up to date. x
8 Content information is grade/age appropriate. x
9 Grammar and spelling are accurate. x
10 Website information complies with copyright laws. x
11 Bibliographic references are provided. x
12 Website provides high-level user interactivity. x
Subtotal: 56/60 points
DESIGN 5 4 3 2 1
13 Overall screen display is visually pleasing. X
14 Text is legible. x
15 Multimedia enhances learning. x
16 Multimedia elements work properly. x
Subtotal: 18 /20 points
NAVIGATION 5 4 3 2 1
17 All links work properly. X
18 All links are clearly labeled. X
19 A site map is provided. X
20 Website is easy to navigate. X
Subtotal: 20 /20 points
GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): 94 /100 points

Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2)
make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3)
provide a rationale to support your recommendation.

.
 Web Site Evaluation Form
1) Website Title: National Geographic Kids URL: http://kids.nationalgeographic.com/
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Subject/topic:
Evaluator: Jillian Myers Date: 10/30/09

Instruction:
Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being
the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

CRITERIA RATING
CONTENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. x
2 Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. X
3 Learning activities are student-centered. X
4 Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. X
5 Content information is accurate and bias free. X
6 Content information is reliable. X
7 Content information is up to date. X
8 Content information is grade/age appropriate. X
9 Grammar and spelling are accurate. X
10 Website information complies with copyright laws. X
11 Bibliographic references are provided. X
12 Website provides high-level user interactivity. X
Subtotal: 55/60 points
DESIGN 5 4 3 2 1
13 Overall screen display is visually pleasing. x
14 Text is legible. x
15 Multimedia enhances learning. x
16 Multimedia elements work properly. x
Subtotal: 20/20 points
NAVIGATION 5 4 3 2 1
17 All links work properly. x
18 All links are clearly labeled. x
19 A site map is provided. x
20 Website is easy to navigate. x
Subtotal: 20/20 points
GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): 95 /100 points

Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2)
make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3)
provide a rationale to support your recommendation.

.
 Web Site Evaluation Form
URL:
1) Website Title: Enthusiastic About Edison _http://questgarden.com/41/48/7/061112165309/
Target Learner: 3rd Grader Subject/topic:
Evaluator: Jillian Myers Date: 10/30/09

Instruction:
Use the following criteria to rate the quality of the website of your choice (1 being the lowest and 5 being
the highest). Be sure to provide a rationale to support your judgment and recommendation of the website.

CRITERIA RATING
CONTENT 5 4 3 2 1
1 Website is affiliated with a reputable organization. x
2 Learning goals/objectives are clearly stated. x
3 Learning activities are student-centered. x
4 Author/webmaster’s contact information is provided. X
5 Content information is accurate and bias free. X
6 Content information is reliable. X
7 Content information is up to date. X
8 Content information is grade/age appropriate. X
9 Grammar and spelling are accurate. X
10 Website information complies with copyright laws. X
11 Bibliographic references are provided. x
12 Website provides high-level user interactivity. X
Subtotal: 54/60 points
DESIGN 5 4 3 2 1
13 Overall screen display is visually pleasing. x
14 Text is legible. x
15 Multimedia enhances learning. x
16 Multimedia elements work properly. x
Subtotal: 20/20 points
NAVIGATION 5 4 3 2 1
17 All links work properly. X
18 All links are clearly labeled. X
19 A site map is provided. X
20 Website is easy to navigate. X
Subtotal: 20 /20 points
GRAND TOTAL (Content + Design + Navigation): 94 /100 points

Excellent: Above 90 Good: 75-89 Fair: 60-74 Poor: Below 60

Rationale for recommendation: Write a couple of paragraphs to 1) summarize the evaluation result, 2)
make a recommendation for use, not use or use with caution of this website in your teaching, and 3)
provide a rationale to support your recommendation.