Explore

Case Processing Summary

30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
30 100.0% 0 .0% 30 100.0%
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Si kap
Post Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Praktek
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Val id Missing Total
Cases

Descript ives
14.1333 .48122
13.1491
15.1175
14.2593
15.0000
6.947
2.63574
8.00
18.00
10.00
3.25
-.772 .427
.323 .833
14.1333 .33471
13.4488
14.8179
14.1852
14.0000
3.361
1.83328
10.00
17.00
7.00
2.25
-.354 .427
-.366 .833
10.8333 .63079
9.5432
12.1234
11.0000
12.0000
11.937
3.45496
3.00
15.00
12.00
5.25
-.752 .427
-.524 .833
11.4333 .71065
9.9799
12.8868
11.5926
12.0000
15.151
3.89237
4.00
16.00
12.00
5.25
-.656 .427
-.654 .833
59.0000 1.10900
56.7318
61.2682
58.8889
60.0000
36.897
6.07425
50.00
70.00
20.00
2.50
.040 .427
-.081 .833
66.0000 1.56102
62.8074
69.1926
66.4815
70.0000
73.103
8.55006
40.00
80.00
40.00
10.00
-.865 .427
1.858 .833
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Mean
Lower Bound
Upper Bound
95% Confidence
Inter val for Mean
5%Trimmed Mean
Median
Vari ance
Std. Devi ation
Mini mum
Max imum
Range
Inter quar tile Range
Skewnes s
Kurtos is
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Pos t Tes t Pengetahuan
Pre Test Sik ap
Pos t Tes t Si kap
Pre Test Praktek
Pos t Tes t Pr ak tek
Stati stic Std. Err or
UjiNormalitas



NPar Tests


Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test



Tests of Normality
.196 30 .005 .927 30 .040
.148 30 .090 .955 30 .233
.266 30 .000 .892 30 .005
.179 30 .016 .900 30 .008
.332 30 .000 .766 30 .000
.280 30 .000 .840 30 .000
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Si kap
Post Test Sikap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Praktek
Statistic df Si g. Statistic df Si g.
Kol mogorov-Smi rnov
a
Shapiro-Wi lk
Lil li efors Si gnificance Correcti on
a.
Descriptive Statistics
30 14.1333 2.63574 8.00 18.00
30 10.8333 3.45496 3.00 15.00
30 59.0000 6.07425 50.00 70.00
30 14.1333 1.83328 10.00 17.00
30 11.4333 3.89237 4.00 16.00
30 66.0000 8.55006 40.00 80.00
Pre Test Pengetahuan
Pre Test Si kap
Pre Test Praktek
Post Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Sikap
Post Test Praktek
N Mean Std. Devi ati on Minimum Maxi mum
Ranks
13
a
14.77 192.00
14
b
13.29 186.00
3
c
30
11
d
14.95 164.50
17
e
14.21 241.50
2
f
30
3
g
8.00 24.00
18
h
11.50 207.00
9
i
30
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ti es
Total
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ti es
Total
Negative Ranks
Positive Ranks
Ti es
Total
Post Test Pengetahuan
- Pre Test Pengetahuan
Post Test Si kap - Pre
Test Si kap
Post Test Praktek- Pre
Test Praktek
N Mean Rank Sumof Ranks
Post Test Pengetahuan < Pre Test Pengetahuan
a.
Post Test Pengetahuan > Pre Test Pengetahuan
b.
Post Test Pengetahuan = Pre Test Pengetahuan
c.
Post Test Si kap < Pre Test Sikap
d.
Post Test Si kap > Pre Test Sikap
e.
Post Test Si kap = Pre Test Sikap
f.
Post Test Praktek< Pre Test Praktek
g.
Post Test Praktek> Pre Test Praktek
h.
Post Test Praktek= Pre Test Praktek
i.

Hasiluji Wilcoxon perbandinganantara score pre danpost
testkelompokperlakuanmenunjukkantidakadaperbedaan yang
bermaknapadapengetahuandansikapdengantarafsignifikansi ( 0.942 dan 0.378
> 0.05)
Untukpraktekadaperbedaan yang bermakna (0.001 < 0.05)


Frequencies


Frequency Table








Test Statistics
c
-.073
a
-.882
b
-3.334
b
.942 .378 .001
Z
Asymp. Si g. (2-tai led)
Post Test
Pengetahuan
- Pre Test
Pengetahuan
Post Test
Si kap - Pre
Test Si kap
Post Test
Praktek - Pre
Test Praktek
Based on posi ti ve ranks.
a.
Based on negative ranks.
b.
Wil coxon Signed Ranks Test
c.
Statistics
60 60 60 60
0 0 0 0
Valid
Missing
N
Kelompok Pengetahuan Sikap Praktek
Kelompok
30 50.0 50.0 50.0
30 50.0 50.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Total
Val id
Frequency Percent Val id Percent
Cumulative
Percent
Pengetahuan
27 45.0 45.0 45.0
33 55.0 55.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Bai k
Total
Val id
Frequency Percent Val id Percent
Cumulati ve
Percent
Sikap
23 38.3 38.3 38.3
37 61.7 61.7 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Bai k
Total
Val id
Frequency Percent Val id Percent
Cumulati ve
Percent


Crosstabs


Kelompok * Pengetahuan




Praktek
24 40.0 40.0 40.0
36 60.0 60.0 100.0
60 100.0 100.0
Buruk
Bai k
Total
Val id
Frequency Percent Val id Percent
Cumulati ve
Percent
Case Processing Summary
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
60 100.0% 0 .0% 60 100.0%
Kel ompok* Pengetahuan
Kel ompok* Si kap
Kel ompok* Praktek
N Percent N Percent N Percent
Val id Missing Total
Cases
Crosstab
12 18 30
13.5 16.5 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
15 15 30
13.5 16.5 30.0
50.0% 50.0% 100.0%
25.0% 25.0% 50.0%
27 33 60
27.0 33.0 60.0
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
45.0% 55.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kel ompok
Total
Buruk Bai k
Pengetahuan
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.606
b
1 .436
.269 1 .604
.607 1 .436
.604 .302
.596 1 .440
60
PearsonChi -Square
Continuity Correction
a
Likeli hood Ratio
Fi sher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue df
Asymp. Si g.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(1-si ded)
Computed onl yfor a 2x2 table
a.
0 cel ls (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The mini mum expected count is 13.
50.
b.


Kelompok * Sikap








Symmetric Measures
.100 .436
60
Contingency Coeffi cient Nominal by Nominal
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue Approx. Si g.
Not assumi ng the null hypothesis.
a.
Usi ng the asymptotic standard error assumi ng thenull hypothesis.
b.
Crosstab
14 16 30
11.5 18.5 30.0
46.7% 53.3% 100.0%
23.3% 26.7% 50.0%
9 21 30
11.5 18.5 30.0
30.0% 70.0% 100.0%
15.0% 35.0% 50.0%
23 37 60
23.0 37.0 60.0
38.3% 61.7% 100.0%
38.3% 61.7% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kel ompok
Total
Buruk Bai k
Si kap
Total
Chi-Square Tests
1.763
b
1 .184
1.128 1 .288
1.773 1 .183
.288 .144
1.733 1 .188
60
PearsonChi -Square
Continuity Correction
a
Likeli hood Ratio
Fi sher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue df
Asymp. Si g.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(1-si ded)
Computed onl yfor a 2x2 table
a.
0 cel ls (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The mini mum expected count is 11.
50.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.169 .184
60
Contingency Coeffi cient Nominal by Nominal
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue Approx. Si g.
Not assumi ng the null hypothesis.
a.
Usi ng the asymptotic standard error assumi ng thenull hypothesis.
b.
Kelompok * Praktek








Hasiluji Chi Square (Pearson Chi Square) menunjukkantidakadahubunganantaraKelompok
(pelakuandankontrol)terhadaptingkatpengetahuan (sig. 0.432 > 0.05) Sikap (sig. 0.148 > 0.05) Pengetahuan (sig.
1.00 > 0.05).
Crosstab
12 18 30
12.0 18.0 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
12 18 30
12.0 18.0 30.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
20.0% 30.0% 50.0%
24 36 60
24.0 36.0 60.0
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
40.0% 60.0% 100.0%
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Count
Expected Count
% wi thi nKelompok
% of Total
Kontrol
Perlakuan
Kel ompok
Total
Buruk Bai k
Praktek
Total
Chi-Square Tests
.000
b
1 1.000
.000 1 1.000
.000 1 1.000
1.000 .604
.000 1 1.000
60
PearsonChi -Square
Continuity Correction
a
Likeli hood Ratio
Fi sher' s Exact Test
Linear-by-Linear
Association
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue df
Asymp. Si g.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(2-si ded)
Exact Sig.
(1-si ded)
Computed onl yfor a 2x2 table
a.
0 cel ls (.0%) have expected count less than 5. The mini mum expected count is 12.
00.
b.
Symmetric Measures
.000 1.000
60
Contingency Coeffi cient Nominal by Nominal
N of Vali d Cases
Val ue Approx. Si g.
Not assumi ng the null hypothesis.
a.
Usi ng the asymptotic standard error assumi ng thenull hypothesis.
b.