Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
Software Corporation
2 MacArthur Place
Santa Ana, CA 92707, USA
Tel: (714) 540-8900
Fax: (714) 784-4056
Web: http://www.mscsoftware.com
Tokyo, Japan
Tel: 81-3-3505-0266
Fax: 81-3-3505-0914
United States
MSC.Patran Support
Tel: 1-800-732-7284
Fax: (714) 979-2990
Munich, Germany
Tel: (+49)-89-43 19 87 0
Fax: (+49)-89-43 61 716
March 2002
S0-1
DISCLAIMER
MSC.Software Corporation reserves the right to make changes in specifications and other information contained in this
document without prior notice.
The concepts, methods, and examples presented in this text are for illustrative and educational purposes only, and are not
intended to be exhaustive or to apply to any particular engineering problem or design. MSC.Software Corporation assumes
no liability or responsibility to any person or company for direct or indirect damages resulting from the use of any
information contained herein.
User Documentation: Copyright 2001 MSC.Software Corporation. Printed in U.S.A. All Rights Reserved.
This notice shall be marked on any reproduction of this documentation, in whole or in part. Any reproduction or distribution
of this document, in whole or in part, without the prior written consent of MSC.Software Corporation is prohibited.
MSC and MSC. are registered trademarks and service marks of MSC.Software Corporation. NASTRAN is a registered
trademark of the National Aeronautics and Space Administration. MSC.Nastran is an enhanced proprietary version
developed and maintained by MSC.Software Corporation. MSC.Marc, MSC.Marc Mentat, MSC.Dytran, MSC.Patran,
MSC.Fatigue, MSC.Laminate Modeler, and MSC.MVision are all trademarks of MSC.Software Corporation.
All other trademarks are the property of their respective owners.
S0-2
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
1.0
Page
Overview of Durability and Fatigue Life
Company Overview .. 1-3
Course Schedule . 1-9
MSC.Fatigue Features . 1-10
MSC.Fatigue User Interface 1-11
Computer Aided Engineering Solutions 1-12
Durability Management .. 1-13
What is Durability .. 1-15
What Drives Durability Management . 1-18
Traditional Approach without CAE: Build it, Test it, Fix it . 1-21
Add CAE: Analyze and Optimize . 1-22
Predicting Product Life 1 Build and Use . 1-23
Predicting Product Life 2 Add Sign-off Testing 1-24
Predicting Product Life 3 Add Simulation Testing 1-25
Predicting Product Life 4 Add CAE 1-26
Integrated Durability Management Activities . 1-27
Integration 1-28
Design Approaches .. 1-29
History of Fatigue Early Days 1-30
A Short History of Fatigue -1 .. 1-31
A Short History of Fatigue -2 1-34
A Short History of Fatigue -3 .. 1-37
A Short History of Fatigue -4 .. 1-39
Fatigue Life Calculation Methods . 1-40
S-N Method Similitude 1-42
Crack Initiation (Strain Life) Method Similitude . 1-43
Crack Propagation Method Similitude .. 1-44
Fatigue Failure and Training ... 1-45
S0-3
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
1.0
Page
Overview of Durability and Fatigue Life
The Physical Basis for Fatigue 1-46
Slip and Stage I Growth 1-47
Initiation and Propagation .. 1-48
Use of Fatigue Technology . 1-50
Fatigue Calculations in .. 1-51
Who does what Fatigue Calculations 1-52
Design against Fatigue .. 1-53
Exploiting Fatigue Analysis the 5 box trick .. 1-55
Durability Tools for Analysis and Test 1-57
Integrated Approach to Durability . 1-58
How Testing supports Analysis 1-59
How Analysis supports Testing 1-60
2.0
Overview of MSC.Fatigue
Whats in MSC.Fatigue .... 2.3
Life Prediction Process 2-5
Elastic Stress or Strain Prediction Methods . 2-7
Transient Dynamic Case 2.16
Frequency Domain . 2.17
Vibration Fatigue Methods .. 2.18
FE Mesh Considerations . 2.19
MSC.Fatigue Analysis Process .. 2.20
MSC.Fatigue Main Form .. 2.21
Geometry/Stress Strain Results 2.24
Materials Database Manager .. 2.26
Loading Time History Database Manager .2.29
Stress Life Analysis (S-N) .. 2.32
Crack Initiation Analysis (E-N) 2.33
S0-4
Section
2.0
Page
Overview of MSC.Fatigue
Crack Growth Analysis (LEFM) .. 2.34
Post-Processing: Results . 2.36
Post-Processing: design Optimization .. 2.39
Advanced Features: MSC.Fatigue Spot weld .. 2.41
MSC.Fatigue Software Strain Gauge 2.47
MSC.Fatigue Utilities 2.52
MSC.Fatigue Vibration . 2.54
Multiaxial Fatigue .. 2.59
3.0
S0-5
Section
4.0
Page
Overview of Patran
Building a model using Patran .. 4.3
Step 1 - Analysis Preferences 4.4
Step 2 - Import/Build Geometry .. 4.6
Step 3 Creating an Analysis Model . 4.7
Step 4 Perform the Analysis .4.12
Step 5 Evaluate Results 4.13
Customization 4.15
Starting MSC.Patran 4.16
MSC.PATRAN File Option . 4.17
MSC.Patran Files . 4.18
The Main Form . 4.19
Typical Widgets used in MSC.Patran 4.21
System Icons . 4.22
Entity Picking . 4.24
Viewing/Model Manipulation 4.29
List Processor 4.30
Entity ID Syntax 4.31
MSC.Patran Standards 4.32
Online Help 4.33
S0-6
Section
5.0
Page
Geometry Modeling
Topological Structures 5.3
Geometry Building Blocks 5.4
Importing, Exporting Geometry and FEM . 5.12
MSC.Patran Database Access .. 5.17
File Export Options .. 5.21
Geometry Construction 5.24
Geometry Form Anatomy 5.25
Select Menu .. 5.26
Geometry Entities Point 5.27
Geometry Entities Curve . 5.33
Geometry Entities Surface .. 5.44
Geometry Entities Solid 5.59
Solid Geometry Boolean . 5.66
Geometric Entities Coordinate frame . 5.67
6.0
Meshing
Finite Element . 6.3
Introduction to Finite Element Meshing 6.5
MSC.Patran Meshing Algorithms . 6.6
Iso (Mapped) Mesher) 6.7
Paver (Free) Mesher for Surfaces 6.10
Iso (Mapped) Mesh Vs. Paver (Free) Mesh 6.12
Meshing Control using Mesh Seeds 6.16
Tetrahedral Mesher TET Mesh . 6.17
Sweep Mesher . 6.19
Association of Finite Elements to Geometry 6.21
Finite Element Form 6.22
S0-7
Section
6.0
Page
Meshing
Where to Start with Meshing .. 6.23
Mesh Seeding .. 6.24
Meshing Parametric Solids . 6.28
Tetmeshing Solids 6.29
Tetmeshing from 2D Elements surrounding Volume .. 6.31
FEM Creation Tool Transform 6.32
Sweep Meshing 6.33
FEM Creation Tool Element/Edit .. 6.35
Equivalence Tie Elements Together .. 6.37
Irregularity Checks 6.40
FEM Editing Node/Move .. 6.41
FEM Editing Node/Offset . 6.42
FEM Editing Node/Project 6.43
Node Editing Example . 6.44
7.0
Viewing
Viewing .. 7.3
Transformations of View . 7.4
Fit Model to Screen and Select New Center 7.5
Select Corners (Local Zoom) and Zoom by Factor . 7.6
Specify View using Angles . 7.7
User Defined Views .. 7.8
General Clipping Planes . 7.9
S0-8
Section
8.0
Page
Groups
Introduction to Groups . 8.3
Example of Groups .. 8.4
Groups Terminology . 8.5
Group Manipulation .. 8.6
Creating a Group .. 8.7
Method of Creating a Group 8.8
Display a Group 8.9
Modifying Groups . 8.10
Moving or Copying between Groups . 8.11
Setting Current Group . 8.12
Transforming Groups .. 8.13
Deleting Groups 8.14
Notes on Groups .. 8.15
9.0
Display
Display 9.3
Entity Type Display .. 9.4
Group Display 9.5
Plot/Erase .. 9.6
Highlighting 9.8
Geometric Attributes 9.9
Finite Element and LBC/Element Property Display Attributes .. 9.11
Titles Example .. 9.12
Spectrums . 9.13
S0-9
Section
10.0
Page
Analysis Setup
Analysis Setup . ..
Setting up the Analysis
Results Translation Back into MSC.Patran .
Reading a MSC.Nastran Bulk Data File ..
11.0
Lists
Lists Overview ..
How to Create a List
Boolean Operations .
Boolean Example .
12.0
11.3
11.4
11.5
11.6
Viewports
Viewports ..
Why use Viewports ..
Creating Viewports ..
Current Viewport ..
Viewports and Groups .
13.0
10.3
10.4
10.5
10.6
12.3
12.4
12.5
12.6
12.7
Results
Results Introduction . 13.3
The Results Main Form 13.6
Results Plot Types 13.7
S0-10
Results
Quick Plot Form 13.11
Quick Plot Animation Form . 13.12
Results Post-processing Procedure ...13.13
Select Results Form . 13.14
Target Entities Form . 13.16
Display Attributes Form 13.18
Plot Options Form . 13.19
Fringe Plot Options .. 13.22
Deformed Shape Plots 13.32
Vector Marker Plot .. 13.33
Marker Display Attributes 13.34
Create Results Form 13.35
X-Y Graph Plotting .. 13.37
Text Report Writer 13.38
Freebody Results . 13.41
Creating a Range .. 13.43
Results with Multiple Viewports .. 13.46
Results Animation . 13.47
Quick Plot Animation 13.49
Animation Control Setup . 13.50
Animation Options Form . 13.51
Animation Control 13.52
Setting up Non-Quick Plot Animation .. 13.53
S0-11
X-Y Plotting
X-Y Plot .
XY Plot Terminolgy ..
Curve Data from File
Scale and Range .
Titles ..
Modify Display Parameters
Modify XY Window ..
Modify Curve .
15.0
14.3
14.4
14.5
14.6
14.7
14.8
14.9
14.10
MSC.Patran Files
MSC.Patran Files
Reverting your Database
Rebuilding a Database
MSC.Patran Files - Generating Hardcopy Plots .
MSC.Patran Files Customization Files .
S0-12
15.3
15.4
15.5
15.6
15.7
S0-13
S0-14
Multiaxial Fatigue
Why do Multiaxial Fatigue Fatigue Calculations? 18.3
The Life Prediction Process E-N Approach . 18.4
Tensor Representation of Stress State 18.7
Stress Tensor Rotation .. 18.10
Principal Stresses (and Strains) . 18.11
Free Surface Stresses . 18.16
Multiaxial Assessment . 18.17
Example: Near Proportional Loading 18.18
Example: Non-Proportional Loading . 18.21
Effect of Multiaxiality on Plasticity, Notch Modeling and damage Modeling 18.23
Exercise . 18.24
Deviatoric Stresses .. 18.25
Yield Criteria .. 18.26
Equivalent Stress and Strain Methods .. 18.30
Some Equivalent Stress/Strain Criteria . 18.32
S-N with Equivalent Stress . 18.33
E-N with Equivalent Strain ... 18.34
Comments on Equivalent Strain Methods . 18.38
ASME Pressure Vessel Code . 18.40
Notch Rules for Proportional Loading 18.43
Extending Neuber to Non-Proportional Loadings 18.49
Multiaxial Fatigue Theory 18.55
MSC.Fatigue Multiaxial Analysis 18.58
Normal Strain Method . 18.61
Shear Strain Method 18.62
S0-15
Multiaxial Fatigue
Smith-Topper-Watson-Bannantine Method
Fatemi-Socie Method ..
Wang-Brown Method ..
Dang-Van Method
Summary of Approach
A Multiaxial Assessment
Exercise
19.0
18.63
18.64
18.66
18.72
18.80
18.81
18.85
S0-16
Spotweld Fatigue
Motivation ..
Structural Stress Based Method
How do we model Spotwelds
Structural Stress Calculations ..
Fatigue Properties Typical Test Specimen .
Damage Calculation Procedure
Results Postprocessing Options ..
Polar Plot of Damage .
Example Problem: A Spotweld Analysis .
Exercise
21.0
20.3
20.5
20.7
20.9
20.11
20.13
20.14
20.16
20.17
20.22
S0-17
23.0
MSC.Fatigue Utilities
Utilities Overview . 23.3
PTIME (Time History Manager) . 23.5
Time History Manipulation Tools 23.6
Graphical Editing of Data GED 23.13
Time History Analysis/Statistics 23.14
Filtering . 23.17
Frequency Analysis . 23.19
Peak Valley regeneration REGEN .. 23.12
Fatigue Analysis (local or test based) Tools 23.23
Other Fatigue Related Tools .. 23.24
Time Correlated Damage TCD 23.26
Stress Concentration Library KTAN 23.27
Rosette Analysis SSA .. 23.28
Data Conversion and other Utilities . 23.29
Exercise 23.30
S0-18
SECTION 1
OVERVIEW OF DURABILITY AND FATIGUE
LIFE ANALYSIS
S1-1
S1-2
COMPANY OVERVIEW
n
MSC.Nastran
MSC.Marc
MSC.Patran
MSC.Dytran
u
u
u
u
S1-3
MSC.MVision
MSC.Fatigue
MSC.Laminate Modeler
MSC.Autoforge
and more
MSC.Software Milestones
u
1963
1965
S1-4
1965
1971
1972
1972
S1-5
1994
1999
S1-6
1994
1999
S1-7
S1-8
COURSE SCHEDULE
Day 1:
Day 3 (Continued):
Intro to Multi-axiality
Hands-On Exercises
Day 4:
Crack Propagation
LEFM Exercises
Spot weld
Software Strain Gauge
Vibration Fatigue
Hands-On Exercises
Advanced Features
MSC.Fatigue Utilities
Day 2:
User Interface (Continued)
Stress-Life (S-N) Theory
Influences on Fatigue Life
S-N Exercises
Day 3:
Strain-Life (E-N) Theory
Mean Stress Correction
E-N Exercises
S1-9
MSC.FATIGUE FEATURES
n
S1-10
S1-11
Materials
& Loading
Information MVI - Flightloads
Engineering
Services
MSC
MSC Institute
Training
Services
S1-12
Tailored
Software
Solutions
DURABILITY MANAGEMENT
MEASUREMENT
TEST
nCode
MSC
ANALYSIS
S1-13
S1-14
WHAT IS DURABILITY?
S1-15
Durability is do ben
u
u
Reliability is
u
having half a chance of doing what its supposed to for as long as its
supposed to do it!
S1-16
Fatigue is ...
u
the process where repeated variations in loading cause failure even when
the nominal stresses are below the material yield strength;
and is
u
S1-17
S1-18
S1-19
reliable
Cumulative Cost
Production
Pilot
Production
Engineering
Prototype
Engineering Prototype
Mechanical
Prototype
DESIGN
FIX
TEST
Concept
Concept
Mechanical
Prototype
Development Time
Traditional Design Development
CAE Design Objectives
S1-20
Build it
Fix it
Test it
OK?
NO
NO
Begin
Production
PAT318, Section 1, March 2002
Out of
time?
YES
S1-21
Previous
experience
OK?
Build it
Correlate test
& analysis
Test it
NO
OK?
S1-22
Measure
YES
Begin
Production
Customer
Usage
Product
Life
S1-23
Customer
Usage
Accelerated
Sign-off Test
Re-Design
S1-24
Product
Life
Customer
Usage
Simulated
Component
Test
Accelerated
Sign-off Test
Measured
Service
Loading
Re-Design
S1-25
Product
Life
Accelerated
Sign-off Test
Simulated
Component
Test
Measured
Service
Loading
Stress
Analysis
Material
Properties
Product Life
Correlation
Computer-based
Fatigue Life
Simulation
Product Life
Re-Design
Optimize
S1-26
DESIGN
ANALYSIS
Analytical
Loads
Kinematic
Modelling
Structural Integrity
Optimization
DATA &
CORRELATION
CORRELATION
DATA
DEVELOPMENT
ANALYSIS
DATA
MEASURED
STRAINS & LOADS
Characterisation
Correlation with FEA
Assess Modifications
Measurement
Validation
Correction
SIMULATION
TEST
Verification
Monitoring
Correlation
DATA
DATA
S1-27
INTEGRATION
n
S1-28
DESIGN APPROACHES
n
SAFE LIFE
u
FAIL SAFE
u
DEFECT TOLERANCE
u
S1-29
S1-30
S1-31
S1-32
Stress Amplitude
Unnotched Shaft
Notched Shaft
S1-33
S1-34
~1mm
Persistent Slip
band formation
Stage I
Crack Growth
S1-35
Stage II
Crack Growth
S1-36
S1-37
1E0
L o g S tr a in
1 E -1
(X/Y)
Ef': 0.374
1 E -2
c : -0.54
E : 2.05E5 MPa
(X/Y)
1 E -3
: Run-out pts
1 E -4
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
S1-38
1E6
1E7
1E8
S1-39
S1-40
f
Total Life
S-N
PAT318, Section 1, March 2002
Crack Initiation
Local Strain
S1-41
p
+
Crack Growth
LEFM
nom
nom
The life of this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is the same as the life of this . . . . .
if both are subject to the same nominal stress
PAT318, Section 1, March 2002
S1-42
S1-43
S1-44
S1-45
S1-46
Under cyclic loading the slip bands tend to group into packets or
striations, forming both ridges and crevices
There is good evidence that the crevices are closely associated with
the initiation of cracks.
Small localised deformations (called extrusions and intrusions) may
occur in the slip bands. These surface disturbances are approximately
1 to 10 microns. They constitute initial microcracks.
S1-47
S1-48
S1-49
Does not require the engineer exploiting it to understand all the finer
points;
S1-50
Verification phase:
u
u
Production phase:
u
S1-51
Design analyst:
u
u
Development engineer
u
u
Production engineer
u
u
S1-52
Requirements:
u
u
u
u
u
higher performance
lower weight
longer life
reasonable cost
as soon as possible
S1-53
Constraints:
u
u
u
u
u
S1-54
Wrong answer
ANALYSIS
LIFE (42)
Garbage OUT
MATERIALS
Garbage IN
S1-55
The information required for rapid and effective Fatigue analysis can be
broken down into:
u
u
u
S1-56
The Fatigue modelling tools used in design analysis and in test analysis
use:
u
u
u
The only difference is that the analyst uses an FE model while the tester
uses a strain gauge.
S1-57
Facts:
u
Testing is not a good way to optimize designs, but is always required for
sign-off.
Useful Fatigue analysis requires verification and good test-based
information.
Neither Testing nor Analysis have exclusively the right Fatigue answer;
therefore its not an argument between rivals.
Best results are obtained when an integrated approach is adopted
incorporating analysis and testing.
S1-58
S1-59
S1-60
S1-61
S1-62
SECTION 2
OVERVIEW OF MSC.FATIGUE
S2-1
S2-2
WHATS IN MSC.FATIGUE?
n
Analysis methods:
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Available in 2 options
u
u
Integrated in MSC.Patran
Standalone MSC.Fatigue
Pre&Post
Features:
S2-3
Time-domain (Quasi-static or
Transient analysis)
Frequency-domain (forced or
random vibration)
Fast preview analysis
Design optimization & sensitivity
analysis
Import from: MSC.NASTRAN,
ABAQUS, ANSYS, MSC.MARC,
SDRC Ideas
MSC.FATIGUE CAPABILITIES
Analysis Options
Crack Propagation
1500
7
6
5
4
Kt( )
Strain (uE)
Vibration Fatigue
Multi-axial Fatigue
-1500
Time (seconds)
Spot/SeamWeldAnalyzer
12
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
Life(Miles)
Sensitivity Analysis
and Optimization
Utilities
Strain Life Plot
605M30
Sf': 857 b: -0.067 Ef': 0.636 c: -0.579
1E-1
4.8548
1E-2
Damage
Z-Axis
0
0
1E-3
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
1E7
Life (Reversals)
1574.7
808.7
Mean
uE
Y-Axis
Range
uE
X-Axis
1E8
-750.4
Damage Distributions
S2-4
Loads
Stress
or Strain
S2-5
LIFE
constitutive
model
stress and
strain
components
elastic strains
from FEA
-N
LIFE
damage
model
constitutive
model and
notch rule
S2-6
Time-domain:
u
u
Frequency-domain:
u
u
S2-7
QUASI-STATIC ANALYSIS
n
n
n
ij , e
(t) =
ij , e , k
P k ( t )
P
k , fea
S2-8
Combination
q(t)
q = Max. Absolute Principal
Signed von Mises
Signed Tresca
Component
Cycle
Counting
Range-Mean
Histogram
Material Properties
Elastic Plastic
Conversion &
Damage Calculation
LIFE
S2-9
S2-10
LOADING HISTORIES
Force(Newtons)
LOAD03.PVX
84.71
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 84.71
Min Y = -50.05
-50.05
0
500
1000
1500
point
Force(Newtons)
LOAD02.PVX
7720
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 7720
Min Y = -7998
-7998
0
500
1000
1500
point
Force(Newtons)
LOAD01.PVX
3769
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 3769
Min Y = -2654
-2654
0
500
1000
1500
point
Screen 1
S2-11
FE Loadcase
Results
FE Loadcase
Loads
S2-12
Local Strain
Histories
STEERING KNUCKLE
S2-13
n
n
n
n
S2-14
n
n
S2-15
S2-16
FREQUENCY DOMAIN
Frequency domain analysis can account for dynamic (resonant) effects
Response variation
Time Domain
Fast Fourier Transform (FFT)
(throw away phases)
5
10
15
Response2
Hertz
20
Power Spectrum
Time in seconds
Frequency (Hz)
S2-17
Frequency Domain
DISPLAY OF NOISE.PSD
50
Cycles
753.5
Frequency (Hz.)
1494.141
S2-18
Range
796
FE MESH CONSIDERATIONS
n
S2-19
FIN
NOR
LST
FNF
Global Fatigue
Analyzer
FEF
FPP
Factor of Safety
Analyzer
FOS
DAC
Design
Optimization
Analyzer
FAL
DCL
KFC
DAC
FES
TDB
Fatigue Pre-Processor
P3/PATRAN - Applications
Results
PAT3FAT
MDB
DHH
TCY
KSN
Fatigue Crack
Analyzer
CRG
S2-20
DYH
XYD
Results Listing
Materials
Postprocessing
Analysis
Loading
Optimization
S2-21
ANALYSIS PROCESS
Quasi-Static, Strain-Life Example
Results from Linear FE give LoadStrain relationship
Strain-Life relationship used to
calculate damage per cycle and
summed to give Life
Geometry
Materials
Strain time
histories
calculated for
each node by
linear
superposition
Rainflow
cycle count
& elasticplastic
correction
Analysis
Postprocessing
Loading
Optimization
S2-22
METHODOLOGY
Geometry
Materials
Analysis
Post-processing
Loading
Optimization
S2-23
S2-24
METHODOLOGY
Geometry
Materials
Analysis
Post-processing
Loading
Optimization
S2-25
Facilities for
u
u
u
u
u
S2-26
Steel
Aluminum
Titanium
Copper
1E4
1E3
1E2
1E1
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
Life (Cycles)
S2-27
1E6
1E7
1E8
1E9
METHODOLOGY
Geometry
Materials
Analysis
Post-processing
Loading
Optimization
S2-28
Facilities for:
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S2-29
Wind
Transmission
Waves
Suspension
TEST102.DAC
1500
Strain (uE)
A typical
load history
showing random
loading
sequences
-1500
Time (seconds)
S2-30
12
METHODOLOGY
Geometry
Materials
Analysis
Post-processing
Loading
Optimization
S2-31
Features
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
MANTEN_SN
SRI1: 3162 b1: -0.2 b2: 0
1E4
1E3
1E2
1E1
1E0
S2-32
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4 1E5
Life (Cycles)
1E6
1E7
1E8
1E9
e Strain
Features
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S2-33
Time
1/2cycle
1cycle
1/2cycle
1cycle
1cycle
1/2cycle
Features
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Cycle-by-Cycle Modeling
Time-sequenced Rainflow Cycle
Counting
Multi-environment Material
Properties
Kitagawa Minimum Crack Sizing
Threshold Modeling
Crack Closure and Retardation
User Defined Life
Fracture Toughness Failure
Criterion
Surface or Embedded Cracks
Modified Paris Law
S2-34
METHODOLOGY
Geometry
Materials
Analysis
Post-processing
Loading
Optimization
S2-35
POST-PROCESSING: RESULTS
u
u
Life Estimates
Log of Life
Damage
Component Specific Life
Units (Flights, Miles, etc.)
Factor-or-Safety
Multiaxiality Indicators
S2-36
POST-PROCESSING: RESULTS
n
Individual Nodes/Elements
Most Damaged Nodes/Elements
Statistical Summary of Damage Distribution
Interactive Results Interrogation of All Life and Damage Estimates
Factor-or-Safety
Multiaxiality Indicators
S2-37
S2-38
u
u
u
u
u
u
Surface Conditions
Material Types /
Parameters
Statistical Confidence
Design Geometry
Loading Conditions
Residual Stresses
and Stress
Concentrations
Mean Stress
Design Life
S2-39
n
n
n
n
S2-40
S2-41
n
n
S2-42
Spotweld Nugget
Beam Element
d
Loading
Fatigue Analysis
(Time History)
Material
(Weld S-N Data)
Optimization
& Testing
S2-43
Post
Processing
My
Fy
Fz
Fy
Fx
Fz
Fz
Mx
Fx
Mx
Fx
Mx
Nugget
Sheet 2
S2-44
Sheet 1
r ,max =
r
Fx , y
My
ds
Fy
Fz
= 1.744 2
s
.
r ,max = 1872
Fx
s
M x,y
ds 2
S2-45
Mx
S2-46
S2-47
S2-48
CORRELATION APPLICATIONS
Software
Strain
Gauges
Hub Strain
Hub Strain
time
time
S2-49
GAUGE DEFINITION
n
Uni-axial Gauges
T Gauges
Delta Gauges
Rectangular Gauges
Planar and stacked formulations.
S2-50
IMPLEMENTATION
n
Gauge position:
u
u
u
Gauge results:
u
u
u
S2-51
MSC.FATIGUE UTILITIES
Time History Reporting
Tools:
u
u
u
u
D IS P L AY OF S IGN AL : NOIS E .D AC
0.5
Accel (g)
u
u
u
Arithmetic Manipulation
Linear Smoothing
Algorithms
Fourier Filtering
Butterworth Filtering
Multiple File Manipulation
(Cut & Paste, etc.)
Graphical Editing of Time
Histories
-0.6
0
S2-52
Time (s ecs)
15
DISPLAY OF SIGNAL:
TEST101.DAC
8191 points.
741 pts/secon
Displayed:
8191 points.
from pt 1
Strain (uE)
1500
Max
= 1499
at 7.105 seconds
Min
= -1445
at 9.672 seconds
Mean = 39.89
S.D. = 444.5
-1500
RMS
Time (seconds)
= 446.2
12
Z Units :
205
Cycles
Z-Axis
912.57
0
Mean
uE
Range
uE
Y-Axis
X-Axis
1414
S2-53
-487.42
MSC.FATIGUE VIBRATION
n
Features:
u
u
u
Resolution of stresses
onto Principal planes
Multi input loads
Correlation effects
using Cross PSDs
Stress tensor
stationarity checks
Calculate Fatigue life
from PSDs
Uses 7 solution
methods
including;Dirlik,
Steinberg and Narrow
Band solutions
Input
Loads
Construct FE model and
designate input and output
nodes
-5
x 10
G xx Gxy
Gxy G yy
G xz G yz
Gxz
Gyz
Gzz
Calculate 6 component
stresses at each output node
and compute the principal
stresses
p( 2.5
Ra
ng 2
e, 1.5
Me 1
an)
0.5
0
200
200
400
600
Range [MPa]
400
0
800
-200
Mean [MPa]
Fatigue Life
S2-54
Wind speed
Hub Stress
Time Domain
time
time
Output
PSD
Frequency
Domain
Transfer
function
frequency
S2-55
PSD Stress
Input
frequency
n
n
S2-56
Material
(S-N analysis)
Fatigue Analysis
(Vibration Fatigue)
Geometry
(FE Analysis)
Optimization
& Testing
S2-57
Post
Processing
TIME
HISTORY
RAINFLOW
COUNT
STRESS
RANGE
HISTOGRAM
Transient
Analysis
FREQUENCY DOMAIN
PSD
Fatigue
MODELLER
Transfer
M0
M1
M2
Function
M
4
S2-58
BLACK
BOX
Fatigue
LIFE
MULTIAXIAL FATIGUE
n
n
Theta=45
90
120
60
150
30
180
1E-9
1E-8
1E-7
1E-6
210
330
240
300
270
S2-59
S2-60
SECTION 3
MSC.FATIGUE USER INTERFACE
S3-1
S3-2
Geometry
Computer-Based
Analysis
Life
Materials
Data
The Analysis
S3-3
The Answer!
S3-4
2 - Import Geometry
2 - Build Geometry
S3-5
S3-6
S3-7
S3-8
S3-9
S3-10
MSC.FATIGUE FILES
MS C/PATR AN - Applications MSC/FATIGUE
LST
FIN
NOR
FNF
Global Fatigue
Analyzer
FEF
FPP
Factor of Safety
Analyzer
FOS
DAC
Design
Optimization
Analyzer
FAL
DCL
KFC
DAC
FES
TDB
Fatigue Pre-P rocessor
P3/PATRAN - Applications
Results
PAT3FAT
MDB
DHH
TCY
KSN
Fatigue Crack
Analyzer
CRG
S3-11
DYH
XYD
Results Listing
Description
jobnameFIN
jobnameFNF
jobnameFES
jobnameASC
*DAC
jobnameFPP
PFATIGUE.PRT
jobnameMSG
jobnameSTA
jobnameABO
jobnameFEF
jobnameRMN
jobnameFPR
jobnameTCY
*KSN
jobnameCRG
jobnameKFL
jobnameDCL
jobnameFAL
jobnameCYH
jobnameDHH
jobnameFOS
S3-12
S3-13
RESULTS FORM
n
Results
Insight
S3-14
Damage
Log of Damage
Life (repeats)
Log Life (repeats)
Life (User Defined Units) e.g. Laps, Flights, etc.
Log of Life (User Defined Units)
S3-15
S3-16
SECTION 4
OVERVIEW OF PATRAN
S4-1
S4-2
4 - Perform the
Analysis
5 - Evaluate
3 - Create
Analysis Results
Analysis Model
2 - Build Geometry
S4-3
S4-4
S4-5
Geometric Modeling:
u
CATIA
Pro/ENGINEER
CADDS 5
EUCLID-3
Unigraphics
Y
Z
S4-6
Auto TetMesher
l
Paver Mesher
l
Z
Y
S4-7
.06326
.04745
.03163
.01582
.0000007040
S4-8
Query...
Column Headers...
Query Command
Apply
Auto Execute
15-5PH Stainless
15-5PH Stainless
17-4PH Stainless
17-4PH Stainless
17-4PH Stainless
17-4PH Stainless
17-7PH Stainless
17-7PH Stainless
DENS
lb/in^3
0.283
-00.282
0.283
0.284
-00.276
-0-
E11C
psi
2.92e+07
-03e+07
3e+07
3e+07
-03e+07
-0-
Materials Selector
Manual Input
PAT318, Section 4, March 2002
S4-9
Clear
S4-10
LEGEND
Force Variation
360.
300.
240.
180.
120.
60.
0.
0. 1.00 2.00 3.00 4.00 5.00 6.00
S4-11
S4-12
Isosurface
Val= 0.5000E+03
Node Scalar1
Color Index
B 0.129E+04
A 0.121E+04
0 0.113E+04
9 0.105E+04
8 0.968E+03
7 0.887E+03
6 0.806E+03
5 0.725E+03
4 0.643E+03
3 0.562E+03
2 0.481E+03
1 0.400E+03
Min = 2.442558E-01
Max = 2.380629E+03
Min ID = 1730
Max ID = 950
Isos_1:
STRESS
COMPONENTS
Von Mises
(NON-LAYERED)
Default
Max DEFLECTION = 1.82E-03
S4-13
S4-14
CUSTOMIZATION
Customer Options
Site Specific
Item...
n
n
S4-15
Acoustic Analysis...
Cancel
STARTING MSC.PATRAN
In the terminal window click the desk top icon to invoke
MSC.Patran
or type Patran
MSC Patran
S4-16
q New Database
q Open Database
q Revert to Original Database
q Session...
q Close
q Quit
q Save
q Save a Copy
S4-17
MSC.PATRAN FILES
Name
File Type
Comments
Model_name.db
Database
Model_name.db.bkup
Database
patran.ses.number
Session File
model_name.db.jou
Journal File
model_name.out
Neutral File
S4-18
Menu Bar
Applications
History Box
Command Line
Tool Bar
S4-19
n
n
S4-20
S4-21
SYSTEM ICONS
Refresh Button - refresh screen
Undo Button -
S4-22
Heartbeat -
S4-23
ENTITY PICKING
n
S4-24
S4-25
CURSOR PICKING
Entity
Multiple Picking
Shift
S4-26
Select Polygon
Ctrl
You may also
select this icon
from the toolbar
PAT318, Section 4, March 2002
Cycle Picking
Shift
Previous
Next
S4-28
VIEWING/MODEL MANIPULATION
-x
+y
-y
+x
Mouse
Rotate XY
Mouse
Rotate Z
Mouse
Translate XY
S4-29
Mouse
Zoom
LIST PROCESSOR
n
n
n
n
The list processor verifies the syntax, checks for existence and
performs rudimentary geometry operations such as calculating the
intersection of two curves
The list processor parses the contents for the select databox
The application only recognizes specific types of data
The list processor is generic and is used by all applications for
consistency
S4-30
ENTITY ID SYNTAX
Syntax
Description
Point 1 2 3
Point 1:9:2
Points 1 through 9 by 2
Curve 1 2, 3/ 4
Surface 3.1
Solid 1:10.2
[x y z]
[xn28, 1, 2]
[1, zp5, 3]
[1, z5, 3]
[1, 2, -64.0/20.0]
<R T Z>
{[ ][ ]}
Signifies an axis with first point representing the base and the second
determining the direction
S4-31
MSC.PATRAN STANDARDS
If your cursor becomes a pointing hand:
S4-32
ON-LINE HELP
Activation
S4-33
S4-34
s Done
Options
- Select an OptionLibrary
Contents
Index
Getting Started
Examples
Sales & Support
Help on Help
Page Locator
Options
Done
S4-35
S4-36
SECTION 5
GEOMETRIC MODELING
S5-1
S5-2
TOPOLOGICAL STRUCTURES
n
n
Face
Vertex
Body
3
Edge
1
n
n
S5-3
9
X
X
Z
S5-4
(X,Y,Z) = function ( 1)
u
u
P(1)
5
P1
Z
Z
Y
X
Y
X
5
Bar Element
PAT318, Section 5, March 2002
S5-5
P2
P1
12
P( 1,2)
(X,Y,Z) = function ( , )
u
u
1 2
3 or 4 bounding edges
A parametric origin and parametric coordinates
whose domains are from 0 to 1
P3
P4
Z
Z
Y
X
Y
X
S5-6
parametric value
2
4
2
4
2/3
1
1/3
1
2
1/3
2/3
Surface 1
S5-7
Paver Mesh
21
24
23
25
22
20
19
18
S5-8
Perimeter
of surface
4 to 6 bounding faces
Parametric origin and coordinates whose
domains are from 0 to 1
P(1,2,3 )
P
S5-9
P
2
P3
B-Rep
Solid
Tetrahedral
Mesh
S5-10
Infinite planes and vectors are used for certain geometric operations,
such as solid break by a plane
A plane is uniquely defined by vector representing its normal and a
point on the plane
A MSC.PATRAN vector quantity is defined by a magnitude, a
direction and a point of origin
Vector
Plane
PAT318, Section 5, March 2002
S5-11
S5-12
S5-13
CAD part
Standard format
S5-14
S5-15
Entity Type
Entity Layers
Trimmed Surface Type
Sew Sheet Bodies
S5-16
S5-17
S5-18
S5-19
S5-20
S5-21
FILES EXPORTED
n
IGES file
u
u
u
u
Points and all curve and surface types, e.g. trimmed parametric
surface
No geometric solids
FEM nodes and elements
No results
S5-22
Step file
u
u
S5-23
GEOMETRY CONSTRUCTION
n
Extracting a Curve
1
Rotating
S5-24
Create
Point
Delete
Curve
Action
Surface
Solid
XYZ
Point
Curve
Surface
Extract
Chain
Trimmed
Face
Interpolate
Manifold
XYZ
XYZ
Project
Revolve
Revolve
Revolve
Object
S5-25
Method
SELECT MENU
Pick only geometry point or finite element node
Pick only geometry point
Pick only finite element node
n
n
S5-27
CREATE/POINT/XYZ
n
n
[0 50 50] [0 0 70]
Picking a choice from the select menu and
following the menu prompts, e.g. Node
PAT318, Section 5, March 2002
S5-28
POINT CREATE
1
1
1
x3
3
2
Create a point at
a
parametric location 1
x4 x
1
1
2
Create points
nonuniformly on a
curve
PAT318, Section 5, March 2002
SHOW/POINT/DISTANCE
n
S5-30
GEOMETRY TRANSFORM*
Method
Comment
Translate
Rotate
Scale
Mirror
Mcoord
Transform entity in one coordinate frame into another with same relative position
Pivot
Transform entity within a plane defined by a pivot and two and points
Position
Vsum
Vector sum of the coordinate locations of two sets of existing entities to create a new
entity
Mscale
Existing entity is simultaneously moved, scaled, rotated and/or warped to a new position
* Transform operations for geometry types point, curve, surface and solid
S5-31
POINT ASSOCIATE/DISASSOCIATE
n
n
n
n
10
10
Y
ZX
n
n
Y
ZX
S5-33
CREATE/CURVE/POINT/3 POINT
n
3 ( 1 =0.75)
( 1 =0)
1
S5-34
GEOMETRY TYPES
n
2
3
X = a 0 + a 1 1 + a2 1 + a 3 1
n
n
S5-35
CREATE/CURVE/CHAIN
Create a composite curve from two or more existing
curves or edges
It retains exactly all the information of the
constituent curves
Individual Curves
3
2
Individual Curves
9
6
8
10
11
7
4
3
Y
Z X
Z X
S5-36
n
n
S5-37
CREATE/CURVE/MANIFOLD
n
Before
Surface 7
1
2
6
After
1
S5-38
CURVE CONSTRUCT
1
2
1
1
3
Must use the select
menu for picking
the curve and point
6
7
1
1
3
7
4
S5-39
EDIT/CURVE/BREAK
n
Trimmed Surface 3
Edge 7
Point 21 is
created at
parametric 0.4
position along u
(or c1) direction
1
21
0.4
S5-40
CURVE EDIT
2
3
2
3
2
Complex
mathematical
representation of
single curve
6
1
S5-41
7
8 1
1 1
18
CURVE SHOW
1
2
1
1
2
Curve ID
Start Point
End Point
Length
1.414235
Curve ID
Type
ParametricCubic
Start Point
End Point
Length
Center
Radius
Type
3.141593
[ 0. 1.75 0. ]
1.
Arc
5
1
6
3
Curve ID
Angle
45.
[ 0.5 0 0 ]
1on>. [ 0.5 0 0 ]
1on>.
S5-42
End Point
Length
Type
1.4
ParametricCubic
0.4
ParametricCubic
Start Point
0.9
ParametricCubic
CURVE ASSOCIATE/DISASSOCIATE
n
n
n
n
n
n
1
2
Y
Z
S5-43
S5-44
3
1
2
1
3
3
2
3
1
8
2
3
Y
S5-45
4
X
S5-46
S5-47
Curves
1
14
13
15
16
Y
Z
S5-48
CREATE SURFACES
n
n
Original Surfaces
Composite Surface
Composite Surface
with Mesh
S5-49
S5-50
Preview Boundary
u
Curve or
Edge
S5-51
S5-52
n
n
Manual
Automatic
l
Manual
Automatic
S5-53
SURFACE EDIT
1
2
3
Complex
mathematical
representation
Set of cubic
parametric surfaces
Parametric
Surface 6
Trimmed
surface 8
with hole
Trimmed surface
with hole
Parametric
Surface 2
Parametric
surface
without
hole
Trimmed surface 4
Remove
Vertex
Point 44
New
Vertex
Trimmed surface
Parametric
surface
S5-55
S5-56
3
1
6
2
1
SURFACE TRANSFORM
Mirror Option
First, select the appropriate select menu icon
coordinate direction 1
Second, click on local Coordinate System 1 from
the viewport to establish the mirror plane to be
coincident with the local YZ-Plane
Third, select the geometry to be mirrored
Before
After
Z
1
S5-57
Free edge
X
Y
z
Non-manifold edge
S5-58
S5-59
SOLID CONSTRUCTION
16
4
18
17
15
3 2
4
1
Use 5 parametric surfaces to create 6 faced
parametric solids
PAT318, Section 5, March 2002
IsoMeshable
n
TetMeshable
S5-61
IsoMeshable
TetMeshable
S5-62
S5-63
SOLID EDIT
Method
Comment
Break
Break a solid into multiple solids using a selected option such as a surface, parametric location etc.
Blend
Create a set of cubic parametric solids from a set of parametric solids such that the first derivative of shape is continuous
across interfaces
Disassemble
Refit
Replace an existing complex shaped parametric solid with a set of simple cubic parametric solids. The extent to which the
new solids match the original solid depends on how many solids are created. Also, can create a parasolid solid.
Reverse
Boolean
Edge Blend
Imprint
Shell
S5-64
S5-65
B-rep
Add
Parametric
S5-66
S5-67
P=(X,Y,Z)
B P=(R, ,)
C
Z
A
Rectangular
X Y Z
n
Y
R
P=(R, ,Z)
Z
Cylindrical
R Z
A
R
Spherical
R
These 3 axes are generically referred to as the 1, 2, and 3 axes with the
above definitions, respectively
S5-68
COORDINATE CREATE
Method
Comment
3Point
Create a coordinate frame by defining an origin, a point along the axis 3 and a point in the
1-3 plane
Axis
Euler
Normal
S5-69
Creates a rectangular
coordinate system
Origin at a point on a
surface or solid face
Coordinate frame axis 3
aligned normal to the
surface or face
Coordinate frame axis 1
aligned with 1
Coordinate Frame 7
7
5
Z
X
S5-70
Z
X
Surface 1
Point 5
SECTION 6
MESHING
S6-1
S6-2
FINITE ELEMENTS
n
Component
(Geometric Model)
S6-3
Finite
Element
Model
FINITE ELEMENTS
n
Bar
Tet
n
Tri
Wedge
S6-4
Quad
Hex
u
u
u
Parametric or non-parametric
Remove unneeded features, e.g. small corners
S6-5
IsoMesh Mesh
Sweep Mesh
Paver Mesh
PAT318, Section 6, March 2002
b
a
1
a
b
a
In the example above, Surface 1:3 are congruent and Surface 4:5 are
congruent, but Surfaces 3 and 4 are not congruent. Two of the
individual mesh paths are labeled a and b.
PAT318, Section 6, March 2002
S6-7
( 1 , 2 )
Node
S6-8
Adjacent mesh
controlled
Mesh seed
controlled
Edge Mesh
Seeded
GEL Controlled
5
1
6*
6*
*Surfaces 1:6
n
Number of Elements =
n
n
12
16
13
17
15
12
30
14
11
29
10
28
27
19
32
25
20
1
Z
21
1
Y
Y
X 1
22
2
23
3
S6-10
4
5
5
6
20
21
X 1
25
23
9
6
24
4
10
7
19
3
4
26
34
22
11
8
20
18
27
35
33
7
9
21
25
17
28
36
32
13
10
22
24
16
8
24
29
31
19
14
11
23
15
16
30
18
15
12
14
10
26
15
17
11
8
31
16
13
14
18
12
13
8
5
3
1 3 56
5 5 54
5 3 52 51
5 0 49
1 3 56
48 47 46
45
14
15
44
15
16
43
16
14
10
9
17
18
12
17
41
18
42
1
19
11
40
19
39
20
21
38
21
22
37
20
6
5
Y
Z X
Y
Z X
22
36
23
2 4 25
2 6 27
2 8 29
30 31 32 33 34 35
5 5 54
53
52
5 1 50
49
48
47
2 3 81
8 2 83
8 4 85
86
2 4 25
2 6 27
28
30
31
29
32
33
34
The number of elements per edge are based on the following priority:
u
u
u
S6-11
46
1 10
72 101 100 99 102 1 03
11 1 1 13 1 09 4 5
10 4
127
1 05
112 1 08 4 4
64
7 3 12 8
106
65
13 4
107 133 43
7 4 12 9
66
1 0 11
98
88 89
9
12
42
75 130
97
67 9 0 41
8
1
76 13 1
96
7
68 91
2
40
77 132
12 0
3
1 21 63 6
39
69
92
78
62
5 4
57
61
38
70
79
93
60 59
12 2
119
58
125 124 8 7
80 123 126
71 94 117 118 37
35
n
n
Paver
n
n
n
S6-12
Iso Mesh
Surface 36
Paver
Mesh
S6-13
GEL = 1/4
GEL = 1/2
GEL = 1/3
meshed using
IsoMesh (Notice the
mesh seeds are
identical, but meshes
are quite different)
IsoMesh Parameters
u
Paver Parameters
u
(1)
(2)
Two Surfaces
(1)
S6-16
(3)
(2)
Uses tria mesh on faces to generate tetrahedral elements in the interior of the solid.
MSC.Patran performs the following:
Meshes Vertices
Meshes Edges
Meshes Faces
Meshes Solids
n
n
n
n
Tri element
meshes all
faces first
S6-17
S6-18
SWEEP MESHER
n
Sweep a lower order element (or node) through space to create higher
order element, i.e. a quad is swept into a hex
Several sweeping techniques are available (Extrude, Glide, etc.) to handle
complex configurations
Glide 1D to 2D
Glide curve
1D bar
elements
S6-19
ASSOCIATED POINTS/CURVES
n
n
n
Face quad
meshed
1
Hex mesh
created by
sweeping quad
elements down
Edge of surface associated to face of solid
Mesh seeds applied on curve 1
S6-20
S6-21
Create
Mesh Seed
Transform
Mesh
Uniform
Curve
One-Way Bias
Element
Surface
Curve Based
Node
2 Curves
Action
Solid
Edit
Object
Edit
Type
S6-22
u
u
Check if the model has special features that may simplify its representation
as a F.E. model, i.e. symmetry
Determine if there are regions of the model that can be ignored for meshing
(i.e. ignore some small features that otherwise might force the overall mesh
to be much finer)
Determine the size of the elements by inspecting the dimensions of the
model and any critical features as fillets
Are there any critical areas where the mesh should be finer
Choose the type of element (i.e. shell versus solid) that is best suited for the
nature of the model and the loading on it
S6-23
MESH SEEDING
n
n
n
Mesh seeding on curves or edges is used to control the number and size
of elements generated for the model
Also, it is used for transitioning a mesh between different densities
MSC.Patran has different methods to generate the seeding
u
u
u
u
u
S6-24
Surface 1
Mesh Ratio = 4
Surface 1
S6-25
n
n
n
n
S6-27
S6-28
TETMESHING SOLIDS
TetMeshing B-Rep Solids
n
n
S6-29
S6-30
Tri element
S6-31
Mirror Plane
S6-32
SWEEP MESHING
n
n
n
n
n
n
S6-33
n
n
S6-34
S6-35
Create
u
Quad elements
skinned over hex
faces
14
7
2
1
29
25
21
15
16
10
11
12
10
11
12
26
27
28
1
5
1
7
2
1
29
28
25
2
1
2
30
3
31
4
32
26
27
28
25
15
23
11
18
14
18
14
10
13
4
32
27
22
16
17
13
15
3
31
26
14
12
2
30
13
16
11
After
16
17
15
10
During
24
21
22
23
24
21
22
23
24
20
17
18
19
20
17
18
19
20
12
19
S6-37
EQUIVALENCING
n
n
n
n
S6-38
EQUIVALENCE FORM
n
S6-39
IRREGULARITY CHECKS
n
n
n
S6-40
S6-41
u
u
Vector Dir
S6-42
Node Project
u
S6-43
Y
Z
S6-44
Before
After
1st click
2nd click
15,4
15
4
S6-45
S6-46
SECTION 7
VIEWING
S7-1
S7-2
VIEWING
S7-3
TRANSFORMATIONS OF VIEW
Translation
and Zoom
actions
Rotations
about axes
Fit
View
S7-4
Transformation
Control
Parameters
Choose Select Center from pull down menu, move cursor to selected
point and click left mouse button
Current Window
Original Center
New Window
New Center
S7-5
Before
After
S7-6
Change the view of model by changing the view angle of rotation about the axes
of either the global or screen coordinate system
View Terminology:
Model
Screen
Absolute
Relative
S7-7
Default view
Top view
Z
Y
Z
Side view
Typical icon
n
n
S7-8
23
20
22
7 17
19
24
25
28
26 27 18
29
16
12
15
21
S7-9
S7-10
SECTION 8
GROUPS
S8-1
S8-2
INTRODUCTION TO GROUPS
n
n
n
S8-3
EXAMPLE OF GROUPS
n
What is a Group?
u
u
u
Elements
Geometry
Total
PAT318, Section 8, March 2002
Middle
S8-4
Ends
GROUPS TERMINOLOGY
n
Current
u
u
Target
u
u
u
Posted
u
u
u
S8-5
GROUP MANIPULATION
n
S8-6
CREATING A GROUP
n
n
n
S8-7
Select element property set names (user specified), i.e. prop_1, prop_2
Property Type
Loads/BCs Set
Select load and boundary condition set names, i.e. lbc_1, lbc_2
Loads/BCs Type
Material
Element Topology
Element Shape
Element ID
MPC Type
Boolean
S8-8
DISPLAY A GROUP
n
S8-9
MODIFYING GROUPS
n
n
n
S8-10
S8-11
Set Current
u
u
S8-12
TRANSFORMING GROUPS
n
S8-13
DELETING GROUPS
n
n
S8-14
NOTES ON GROUPS
n
n
S8-15
S8-16
SECTION 9
DISPLAY
S9-1
S9-2
DISPLAY
Display tools are used to organize and enhance the appearance of the model in
viewports
Two types of display modes:
u
u
n
n
Entity mode targets entities by type (i.e. all curves are yellow, all quads are white)
Group mode targets by group (i.e. default group is wireframe, bracket group is shaded
yellow)
S9-3
S9-4
GROUP DISPLAY
n
S9-5
PLOT/ERASE
n
Toolbar, Quickpick
button for plot/erase
S9-6
PLOT/ERASE EXAMPLE
HIGHLIGHTING
n
n
n
n
Find any posted entity by entering its name and ID number (i.e.
Element 32)
Find entities associated to other entities using Tools/List/Create
Highlight color is modified under Preferences/Graphics
Dynamic highlighting can be turned on under Preference/Picking
32
S9-8
GEOMETRIC ATTRIBUTES
n
Display
Lines
S9-9
Point
Size
Labels
1
2
1
1
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
Before
21 2
1
21
1
2
2
1
12
2
1
2 1
1
2
1
1
12
12
2
1
2
1
2
2
1
1
2
21
1
2
22
1
S9-10
FEM
u
u
u
u
u
Element shrink
Free edges and faces
Node size
Colors and labels
Coordinate frames
LBC/Element Props.
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S9-11
TITLES EXAMPLE
162.5
162.5
158.1
158.1
153.6
153.6
149.1
144.7
140.2
135.7
131.3
100 < T(t)
T(t) < 162.5
126.8
131.3
100 F
(Constant)
126.8
122.3
122.3
Linear
Variation
117.9
108.9
Before
n
n
n
n
108.9
Adiabatic BottomEdge
104.5
104.5
After
100.0
117.9
113.4
113.4
144.7
140.2
135.7
149.1
S9-12
100.0
SPECTRUMS
n
S9-13
S9-14
SECTION 10
ANALYSIS SETUP
S10-1
S10-2
ANALYSIS SETUP
n
n
S10-3
S10-4
Stresses, deformation
Model Data
Nodes, elements
Both
Be sure to click
S10-5
SECTION 11
LISTS
S11-1
S11-2
LISTS OVERVIEW
n
n
Lists are not stored in the database, but can be added to a Group
S11-3
n
n
n
Create List A
Nodes at X =
18 + 1
n
n
S11-4
Create List B
Elements Associated
with Nodes in List A
When using a List as
input, enclose the
List name in back
quotes (e.g. `lista`)
BOOLEAN OPERATIONS
n
Intersection operation
finds common items in both lists
Union
combines items in both lists
Results of subtracting
one list from another
Example:
u
Elements with a Von Mises stress result value > 20,000 and a
temperature result value > 300
S11-5
BOOLEAN EXAMPLE
n
n
n
Plot Von
Mises stress
Create List A
Elements with
a Von Mises
stress result
value greater
than 20K
S11-6
n
n
n
Plot
temperatures
Create List B
Elements
associated with a
temperature
result value
greater than 300
n
n
S11-7
S11-8
SECTION 12
VIEWPORTS
S12-1
S12-2
VIEWPORTS
What is a Viewport?
u
n
n
S12-3
Different views of
same groups
Isometric
Front
Geometry
FEM
Different pieces of
your model in
separate viewports
Different results in
different viewports
each with its own range
Part
Whole
S12-4
CREATING VIEWPORTS
No limit on how many viewports one can create
S12-5
CURRENT VIEWPORT
n
n
n
Click in area just inside the outer border to make a posted viewport
current
Or Viewport/Modify/Change Target Viewport/Make Current
Posted Viewport
Current Viewport
S12-6
S12-7
S12-8
SECTION 13
RESULTS
S13-1
S13-2
RESULTS INTRODUCTION
n
S13-3
n
n
Static
Transient each time step = 1 Result Case
Non-linear each load increment = 1 Result Case
S13-4
S13-5
Procedure
u
S13-6
Quick Plot
Deformation Plot
S13-7
Fringe Plot
PAT318, Section 13, March 2002
Vector Plot
n
Animation
S13-9
XY Plot (Graph)
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S13-10
Fringe plots
Deformed plots
Combined fringe and deformation plots
Quick animation
S13-11
S13-12
S13-13
n
n
n
S13-14
Select
Subcases
Select
Subcases
Global Variable
Character String
Subcase IDs
A combination of the above
S13-15
S13-16
Nodes
Elements
Faces/Free Faces
Edges/Free Edges
Corners
Element Centroids
Element Nodes
Element All Data
S13-17
S13-18
Display
Attributes
Button
u
u
u
u
u
S13-19
Plot
Options
Button
u
u
u
S13-20
yy
Local Coord 1
Coord 0
xx
1
Domain
All Entities: all result values at a node are
averaged producing a single value
u None: no averaging at node
result values at a node are
Material
averaged if the contributing
Property elements are of the same Type,
Material or Element Property, or
Target
Entities are part of the defined Target
Entity set
Element
Type
u
S13-22
S13-23
Method
l
S13-24
Method
l
Difference:
Sum:
S13-25
S13-26
1
Node Result = N
S13-27
i=1
(Element Result)
Shape Fn.:
S13-28
Element
Integration point, + Element
result value,
Coarse mesh
Fine mesh
S13-29
S13-30
S13-31
S13-33
S13-34
u
u
u
u
S13-35
Specify
set of
results
S13-36
S13-37
Results, Target Entities and Plot Options are very similar to those of
other Plot Types
S13-38
n
Scalar Value
Loadcase ID
Subcase ID
Layer ID
X Location
Y Location
Z Location
Magnitude
CID
Material ID
X Component
YComponent
ZComponent
Material Name
Property ID
Property Name
ACID
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S13-39
Format
l
S13-40
FREEBODY RESULTS
n
n
n
S13-41
126.25
447.52
981.00
1089.75
1447.52
External Loads
Reaction Forces
151.30
513.59
405.13
648.83
170.13
513.59
648.83
386.30
S13-42
CREATING A RANGE
n
Step 1: Create a
range (one for
each viewport)
Step 2:
select
Data
Method
Step 3: select
Thresholding
Step 5:
Apply
Step 4:
Calculate
range
S13-43
Semi-Auto
u
Semi-Auto (Delta)
u
Middle:
u
From/To:
u
From:
u
S13-44
S13-45
S13-46
RESULTS ANIMATION
n
S13-47
Frame 1
Frame 7
Frame 13
Frame 20
S13-48
S13-49
S13-50
Animation
Options
button
S13-51
ANIMATION CONTROL
n
Cycle:
Bounce:
S13-52
Select
Animation
Options button
Set Animate
Method to
Global
5
Variable
Select a set of
2 Result Cases and
a result type
Select the
Number of
Frames
Click on
Animate
Hit Apply
S13-53
S13-54
SECTION 14
X-Y PLOTTING
S14-1
S14-2
X-Y PLOT
n
n
n
S14-3
XY PLOT TERMINOLOGY
S14-4
Format
XY DATA
If XY pairs
XYDATA, beautiful_curve
-3. -2.8
Curve name
-2.3 -2.
-2.099999 -1.3
-1.7 -0.30000001
-1.6 0.660000003
-1.3 1.3
Data set 1
-0.899998 2.2
-2.330001 2.7
0. 1.7
0.3300001 0.4000001
YDATA
YDATA, new_curve
If Y only
100.
(X initial
100.
And Xdelta
300.
Will be
300.
Specified
500.
Under curve
500.
Data
400.
Attributes)
Data set 2
300.
200.
0.
S14-5
Scale
u
u
u
Range
u
Linear
Semi-Log
Log-Log
Controls method used to determine start
and end points for the X and Y axes
S14-6
TITLES
XY Plot: database_name: XYWindow1
LEGEND
quadratic_load
20.0
Load Case 4
0.
% distance from
left of window
-20.0
% distance from
top of window
-60.0
-40.0
-80.0
-100.
-1.05-.700-.350 0.
S14-7
XY Window:
Curve:
Legend:
Axis:
Plot Titles:
Load Case 4
0.
1.50
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00
27.0
Temperature (C)
Versus
Time (sec)
22.5
18.0
13.5
9.00
4.50
Node 6
0.
0.
1.50
3.00
4.50
6.00
7.50
9.00
S14-8
Location, Border,
Background, Color
Post/Unpost, Line
Style, Name,
Data, Symbols,
Color,Thickness,
Curve Fit Method
On/Off, Location,
Border, Text,
Background, Color
Line Style, Scale,
Label
Formats,
Titles, Tick
Marks, Grid Lines
Location, Size,
Color, Post/Unpost
MODIFY XY WINDOW
Border
Background
S14-9
MODIFY CURVE
n
Dot
Square
Fill Diamond
Circle
Fill Square
Arrowhead
Fill Circle
Triangle
Fill Arrowhead
Fill Triangle
Hexagon
Plus
Diamond
Fill Hexagon
LEGEND
Variable_load
20.0
0.
-20.0
-40.0
-60.0
-80.0
-100.
-1.20
-.800
-.400
0.
.400
.800
1.20
S14-10
SECTION 15
MSC.PATRAN FILES
S15-1
S15-2
MSC.PATRAN FILES
Name
File Type
Comments
model_name.db
Database
model_name.db.bkup
Database
patran.ses.number
Session file
model_name.db.jou
Journal file
model_name.out
Neutral file
model_name.db_m
Marker file
CAD_partfile_name.exp.bxp
S15-3
S15-4
REBUILDING A DATABASE
Using a Journal File
n
n
n
n
S15-5
MSC.PATRAN FILES
Generating Hardcopy Plots
CGM
HPGL
HPGL/2
Patran Hard
PS
EPS
S15-6
S15-7
Edit
Location
Comments
settings.pcl
p3epilog.pcl
p3prolog.pcl
template.db
P3_HOME (default)
S15-8
S15-9
S15-10
SECTION 16
STRESS-LIFE (S-N) THEORY
S16-1
S16-2
S16-3
Some Definitions
S16-4
S-N Analysis
n
n
S16-5
S-N Curve
S16-6
S16-7
S tres s Amplitude
Unnotched S haft
Notched S haft
S16-8
S-N Approach
S16-9
S-N Approach
purposes of design
determination of a fatigue strength at a specified life
demonstration of improved fatigue resistance from a
material or surface treatment
acceptance of material for manufacturing purposes
answering questions posed by a service failure
S16-10
S-N Curves
S16-11
S-N Curves
S16-12
Steel or Ti
Al alloy
or steel in seawater
S16-13
Log(Life)
S16-14
S16-15
_
Nominal Stress P
A
S16-16
( 0 )
1
m+2
1
1
10
Endurance N (cycles) - log scale
S16-17
nom
nom
The life of this . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . is the same as the life of this . . . . .
if both are subject to the same nominal stress
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-18
S16-19
S16-20
S16-21
M
ea
n
60000
Range
Damage =
10
0M
Pa
100 MPa
Ni
Nf
Accumulate d damage =
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-22
300
= 0 .5 % Life
60000
S16-23
S1
n1
N1
N1
S16-24
S1
Disadvantage:
Assumes that the level of stress has no effect on the
damage ratio, for example: tests do indicate that high
stress cycles followed by low stress cycles cause more
damage than the other way around.
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-25
Conclusion: Nonlinear theory does not buy us much and is difficult to use.
Consequently it is not used in practice, and therefore is not in MSC.Fatigue.
S16-26
S16-27
Stress or Strain
Stress or Strain
Time
Time
Time History
Peak Valley
Extraction
S16-28
Rainflow Cycle
Counting
S16-29
The story goes Matsuishi and Endo got the idea for
the method while watching rain water cascading
down a pagoda roof.
Basic rules: rain flows down from each turning point
and continues until either:
u
u
S16-30
S16-31
S16-32
S16-33
M
ea
n
60000
Range
Damage =
10
0M
Pa
100 MPa
Ni
Nf
Accumulate d damage =
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-34
300
= 0 .5 % Life
60000
Information
Stress or Strain
Stress or Strain
Loose Frequency
Information
Peak Valley
Rainflow Cycle
Extraction Loose Sequence Counting
Time
Time
LIFE
100 MPa
60000
Life
Damage Histogram
S16-35
Damage Counting
S16-36
S16-37
Mean Stresses
S16-38
Mean Stresses
n
n
n
S16-39
S16-40
Un-Safe
Safe
Un-Safe
Haigh Diagram
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-41
S16-42
a m
+
=1
Se Su
Goodman method
Gerber method
a = stress amplitude
m = mean stress
S u = ultimate tensile stress
S e = equivalent stress for m = 0
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-43
Haigh Diagram
PAT318, Chapter 16, March 2002
S16-44
S16-45
Component Size
Small laboratory specimens and large
engineering structures
Influence of Specimen Size on Endurance Limit:
S16-46
Component Size
The endurance limit used for design (Se) can be
calculated from the experimental endurance limit (Se)
from any size specimen: Se=Se Csize
S16-47
S16-48
Type of Loading
Problem:
Data from rotating bend tests
Structure sees tension or torsion
S16-49
S16-50
Notches
S16-51
Notches
S16-52
S16-53
S16-54
S16-55
= (Kf - 1) / (Kt - 1)
S16-56
S16-57
UNNOTCHED
1000
800
600
SMOOTH
Amplitude(MPa)
400
200
Kt=3, Kf=2.67
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
Life(Cycles)
S16-58
1E7
1E8
S16-59
1000 cycles
Kf
Stress
unn
otc
hed
no
tch
ed
Kf
Life
S16-60
S16-61
S16-62
S16-63
107 Cycles
1000 Cycles
S16-64
Surface Finish
S16-65
Surface Finish
S16-66
1000 cycles
pol
ish
Stress
ed
ro
ug
h
Life
S16-67
Compression
Tension
Compression
Tension
+
Surface Compression
Stress
Compression
=
Oscillating bending
Stress
Tension
S16-68
Shot Peening
u
Cold Rolling
u
Nitriding
u
S16-69
Stress-Life in MSC.Fatigue
n
Features
u
u
u
b1: -0.2
b2: 0
E: 2.034E5
UTS: 600
1E4
u
1E3
u
u
1E2
u
u
1E1
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
Life (Cycles)
1E6
1E7
1E8
1E9
Elastic Stresses
Rainflow Cycle Counting
Mean Stress Correction
Welded Structures
Statistical Confidence Parameters
Palmgren-Miner Linear Damage
User Defined Life
Material and Component S-N
Surface Conditions
Factor of Safety Analysis
Biaxiality Indicators
S16-70
e
u
a = Se ( 1 m u )
Se
f = --- ( 1
= Endurance Limit ;
m u )
= Ultimate stress
u
The factor by which we can increase our alternating stress (for a given mean stress),
without causing any fatigue failure.
S16-71
Gerber Based:
Factor of Safety =
e ( 1 m u ) CSurf C Size
--------------------------------------------------------------------- --k
f
a
12
1 ( ) 2
CSurf C Size
m u
e
------------------------------------------------------- -----------------------------------kf
a
S16-72
Fatigue life computed from the log stress vs. log cycles (S-N)
curve.
S16-73
S16-74
Example Problem:
S-N Analysis of a Keyhole Specimen
Perform simple S-N
analysis.
Single load input
(fully reversed
loading).
S16-75
S16-76
S16-77
S16-78
S16-79
S16-80
Submit Job
Read Results
Display Life Contours
S16-81
Exercise
S16-82
SECTION 17
STRAIN-LIFE (EN) THEORY
S17-1
S17-2
S17-3
S17-4
S17-5
S17-6
S17-7
S17-8
n
n
n
S17-9
E-N ANALYSIS
Input is time history of STRAIN
Also known as Low Cycle Fatigue or Local Strain Approach
Local strains can be elastic or plastic hence its suitability for Low Cycle
fatigue
N
PAT318, Section 17, March 2002
S17-10
High Cycle
Region
(SN or EN Method)
/S
S-N & E-N curves coincide
in high cycle region
because nominal stresses
will be linear elastic
1000 Cycles
10 7 Cycles
S17-11
MATERIALS CHARACTERIZATION
S17-12
Stress
STRESS-STRAIN RESPONSE
Strain
S17-13
Stress
Strain
S17-14
Stress
Strain
Material Memory
S17-15
S17-16
S17-17
S17-18
S17-19
S17-20
CYCLIC SOFTENING
strain(mm/mm)
STRAIN.DAC
SOFT.DAC
stress
MPa
5E-3
800
-5E-3
600
0
100
200
300
400
Se c s .
stress(MPa)
5
7
9
400
CONTROL PARAMETER
SOFT.DAC
200
600
400
0
200
0
-200
-200
-400
-400
0
100
200
300
8
6
4
2
400
Se c s .
-600
-0.01
RESPONSE PARAMETER
Screen 1
-5E-3
5E-3
strain (mm/mm)
S17-21
0.01
Screen 1
CYCLIC HARDENING
strain(mm/mm)
STRAIN.DAC
HARD.DAC
stress
MPa
5E-3
800
-5E-3
600
0
100
200
400
300
400
Se c s .
CONTROL PARAMETER
stress(MPa)
7,9
5
3
HARD.DAC
200
600
1
400
200
0
-200
-200
4
-400
-400
2
4
100
200
300
400
Se c s .
-600
RESPONSE PARAMETER
6,8
-5E-3
Screen 1
5E-3
strain (mm/mm)
S17-22
0.01
Screen 1
S17-23
S17-24
STRESS-STRAIN RELATIONSHIPS
Monotonic
= +
E K
a a
=
+
E K'
Ramberg-Osgood
Relationships
n'
Stress (MPa)
Cyclic
Strain (M/M)
nCode nSoft
S17-25
Stress(MPa)
200
-200
-4000
-2000
0
Strain(uE)
S17-26
2000
4000
1E0
L o g
S tr a in
1 E -1
(X/Y)
Ef': 0.374
1 E -2
c : -0.54
E : 2.05E5 MPa
(X/Y)
1 E -3
: Run-out pts
1 E -4
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
S17-27
1E7
1E8
Basquin showed that for high cycle fatigue, fatigue life has a
power law relationship with elastic strain.
Coffin and Manson did the same for low cycle fatigue and plastic
strain.
Add the two together and you have a relationship between total
strain and fatigue life covering low and high cycle fatigue.
S17-28
COFFIN-MANSON-BASQUIN EQUATION
tot = el + pl
Coffin Manson
Basquin
el =
'f
E
pl = f (2Nf )
'
(2Nf )
a =
'f
E
(2Nf ) + f (2Nf )
S17-29
'
S17-30
f
b
c
'
(2Nf ) = f (2Nf ) at Nf = Nt
E
1
2Nt
fE
K
'
(b-c)
S17-31
S17-32
Chemical composition
Heat treatment
Cast vs. wrought
Surface treatments
Degree of deformation
S17-33
S17-34
S17-35
The story goes Matsuishi and Endo got the idea for the method
while watching rain water cascading down a pagoda roof.
Basic rules: rain flows down from each turning point and
continues until either:
u
u
S17-36
S17-37
S17-38
Some cycles stand within the largest hysteresis loop and some
hang; this depends on cycle sequence
S17-39
There are two main methods for correcting for mean stress in
the local strain approach:
u
Morrow
it moves the elastic life line up and down according to the mean
stress of each cycle
Smith-WatsonTopper
uses a damage parameter which includes the maximum stress of
each cycle
S17-40
MORROW CORRECTION
S17-41
S17-42
SWT VS MORROW
n
n
n
S17-43
EXERCISE
n
S17-44
ELASTIC-PLASTIC CORRECTION
AND LOCAL GEOMETRY
S17-45
n
n
Neuber worked in statics, not fatigue, but noticed that the ratios of plastic
strain and plastic stress were different.
S17-46
ELASTIC-PLASTIC CORRECTION
Elastic FE Strain
Neuber Equation
Solution point
=e2
S17-47
S17-48
S17-49
CSSC
2
3
Kf
Neuber Equation
Solution point
s
S17-50
S17-51
Neuber hyperbola
S17-52
e
Cyclic Stress - strain
a a
a =
+
'
=
+
2
2 2 '
n'
Hysteresis curve
e
Neuber Formulation (assumes uniaxial
stess-strain behaviour)
S17-53
= e2
n'
S17-54
<
and
Lp
p =
Ly
PAT318, Section 17, March 2002
<
<
<
<
<
)e = ( )
<
<
<
<
= e / p
<
<
<
<
where :
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
Seeger-Beste Equation :
)( e )= ( )( )
<
Mertens-Dittmann Equation :
MERTENS-DITTMAN METHOD
Graphical representation of Mertens-Dittmann Method
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
new origin at (
<
<
<
<
S17-55
<
<
<
<
,
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
SEEGER-BESTE METHOD
Graphical representation of Seeger-Beste Method
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
<
new origin at ( 0 , )
<
<
<
<
e
PAT318, Section 17, March 2002
S17-56
BA 2
My =
y
6
y
BA 2
Mp =
y
4
S17-57
SURFACE FACTORS
As in the S-N method, surface factors can be used to modify the strain life curves to
account for surface finish etc. These factors are applied to the elastic strain-life curve at
the endurance limit.
Polished, untreated, stress free, is considered as the starting point with Surface Factor = 1
(as in LCF test specimens).
S17-58
S t r a in
A m p lit u d e ( M /M )
1E0
1E-1
1E-2
Polished
1E-3
Forged
1E-4
1E0
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
Life (Reversals)
S17-59
1E7
1E8
1E9
S17-60
P
Nominal stress, strain - s,e
CSSC
SWT-Life
Mild_Steel
n': 0.159 K': 816 E: 2E5
Mild_Steel
Sf': 757 b: -0.089 Ef': 0.541 c: -0.547
S tr e s s
P a ra m e te r
1E2
0
0
0.01
0.03
Strain (M/M)
1E1
S T W
( M P a )
(M P a )
564
1E-1
1E0
1E-2
1E0
P
1E1
1E2
1E3
1E4
1E5
1E6
1E7
1E8
Life (Reversals)
S17-61
1E9
STRESS-STRAIN TRACKING
A
C
e(t)
B
B = e1 , B
C = De2
D = De3 , D
E = De4
known Kf
A
C
E
PAT318, Section 17, March 2002
S17-62
A
s 1 = E . e1
Kf.s1
CSSC
= / E + ( / k)1/n
s1
A e1
Kf.e1
S17-63
1 . 1 = NP1
plotting position
is 1, 1
STRESS-STRAIN TRACKING
Basic Rule:
Reset the origin and set off in the
right direction!
S17-64
B (1 , 1 )
e2
2nd Excursion
e(t) B
s2
C
2 x CSSC
2k)
= / E + 2( / 2 1/n
2 . 2 = NP2
plotting position
is 2 =(1- 2),
2=(1- 2)
PAT318, Section 17, March 2002
C (2 , 2 )
S17-65
B (1 , 1 )
3rd Excursion
e(t)
D (3 , 3 )
C
3 . 3 = NP3
plotting position
is 3 =(2+ 3),
3=(2+ 3)
A (0,0)
C (2 , 2 )
S17-66
plotting position is
NOT 4 =(3- 4),
4=(3- 4)
4=(2- 5)
A
E
C
Not E
S17-67
Extracted Cycle
max
SWT = max . /2
S17-68
(M P a )
Mild_Steel
Sf': 757 b: -0.089 Ef': 0.541 c: -0.547
1E2
P a ra m e te r
SWT = max . /2
1E1
S T W
SWT
1E-1
1E0
1E-2
1E0
d=1/ Nf
S17-69
1E1
1E2
1E3
2Nf
1E4
1E5
Life (Reversals)
1E6
1E7
1E8
1E9
d i = 1 / N fi
D = di
Ni = 1 /D
S17-70
IMPLEMENTATION IN MSC.FATIGUE
n
S17-71
e Strain
Features:
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
S17-72
Time
1/2cycle
1/2cycle
1cycle
1cycle
1cycle
1/2cycle
S17-73
S17-74
FATIGUE ANALYSIS
n
n
n
S17-75
S17-76
EXERCISE
n
S17-77
S17-78
SECTION 18
MULTIAXIAL FATIGUE
S18-1
S18-2
S18-3
plasticity
modelling
stress and
strain
components
elastic strains
from FEA
constitutive
model and
notch rule
S18-4
LIFE
damage
model
xx
xy
yx
xy
yy
S18-5
xx
yx
zx
xx
zz
x
zy xy
yy
S18-6
xz
xx
n
n
xx xy xz
yx yy yz
zx zy zz
S18-7
STRAIN TENSOR
n
xx xy xz
yx yy yz
zx zy zz
S18-8
TRANSFORMATION OF CO-ORDINATES
Z
Z
Y
Y
X
X
S18-9
~
S' = TST
l11
T = l21
l31
l12
l22
l32
l13
l23
l33
S18-10
n
n
The principal stress axes are the set in which the diagonal terms
disappear. In these directions the direct stresses reach their extreme
values
The maximum shear strains occur at 45 degrees to the principal axes.
The principal stresses can be calculated from:
3 I1 2 + I 2 I3C = 0
where
I1 = x + y + z
I2 = x y + y z + y z 2 2 2
xy
xz
yz
I3 = x y z + 2 xy xz yz x 2 y 2 z 2
yz
xz
xy
S18-11
xy
2
xy
max
S18-12
max
S18-13
S18-14
S18-15
y
x
S18-16
MULTIAXIAL ASSESSMENT
n
u
u
u
2
ae =
1
ae = -1:
ae = +1:
ae = 0:
Pure Shear
Equi-Biaxial
Uni-axial
S18-17
Strain(UE)
S131A.DAC
Sample = 409.6
Npts = 9446
Max Y = 1301
Min Y = -392.3
-392.3
0
10
12
Seconds
121.1
Strain(UE)
S131B.DAC
Sample = 409.6
Npts = 9446
Max Y = 121.1
Min Y = -284.3
-284.3
0
10
12
Seconds
2663
Strain(UE)
S131C.DAC
Sample = 409.6
Npts = 9446
Max Y = 2663
Min Y = -298.7
-298.7
0
10
12
Seconds
Screen 1
S18-18
S131.ABS
Strain
UE
5000
5000
4000
4000
3000
3000
2000
2000
1000
1000
-1000
-1
-0.5
0.5
-1000
-50
Screen 1
50
Angle (Degrees)
Orientation of 1 vs. 1
S18-19
Screen 1
The left plot indicates that the ratio of the principal stresses is nearly
fixed at around 0.4, especially if the smaller stresses are ignored.
The right hand plot shows that the orientation of the principal stresses
is more or less fixed.
S18-20
GAGE103.DAC
Sample = 200
Npts = 3.672E4
Max Y = 161.4
Min Y = -81.32
-81.32
0
559.5
50
100
150
GAGE102.DAC
Sample = 200
Npts = 3.672E4
Max Y = 559.5
Min Y = -274.6
-274.6
0
716.2
50
100
150
GAGE101.DAC
Sample = 200
Npts = 3.672E4
Max Y = 716.2
Min Y = -651
-651
0
50
100
150
S creen 1
S18-21
GAGE1.ABS
Stress
MPa
200
200
100
100
-100
-100
-200
-1
-200
-0.5
0.5
-50
Screen 1
0
Angle (Degrees)
50
Screen 1
S18-22
p constant
Proportional
Multiaxial
p constant
Non-Proportional
Multiaxial
p may vary
a
a= 0
-1 < a < +1
a may vary
Increasing
Difficulty
(and Rarity)
OK
Need a
Tricky
Decreasing
Confidence
S18-23
EXERCISE
n
S18-24
DEVIATORIC STRESSES
The deviatoric stresses
Sx,y,z are given by:
S x = x Ph
S y = y Ph
S z = z Ph
1
Ph = ( x + y + z )
3
S18-25
YIELD CRITERIA
When the stress state is not uniaxial, a yield point is not sufficient. A
multiaxial yield criterion is required. The most popular criterion is the von
Mises yield criterion. All common yield theories assume that the
hydrostatic stress has no effect, i.e. the yield criterion is a function of the
deviatoric stresses. The von Mises criterion - based on distortion energy
- can be expressed in terms of principal stresses:
2
S1
2
S2
2
S3
)=
2
3 y
or
1
2
( 1 2 ) + ( 2 3 ) + ( 3 1 ) = y
2
max
1 2 2 3 3 1 y
= max
,
,
=
2
2
2
2
S18-26
von Mises
yield surface
hydrostatic stress
2
1
S18-27
S2
S3
S18-28
S18-29
S18-30
They dont account for the known fact that fatigue failure occurs in
specifically oriented planes. Rather these approaches average the
stresses/strains to obtain a failure criterion with no regard to the
direction of crack initiation.
Tresca and von Mises are not sensitive to the hydrostatic stress or
strain
S18-31
1 = eq
1 = eq
eq
1 3
= eq =
2
2
1 3 max (1 + ) eq
=
=
2
2
2
1
2
( 1 2 ) 2 + ( 2 3 ) 2 + ( 3 1 ) 2
1
(1 + ) 2
(1 2 ) 2 + ( 2 3 ) 2 + ( 3 1 ) 2
=
S18-32
e e + p p
e + p
= eq
= eq
= f (2 N
2
1
= f (2 N f
2
f
max
(2 N
=
2
2
VM
= f (2 N
2
S18-33
'f
=
2
E
'f
=
2N f
2
G
1 = and 1 = , so
2
'
1 f
=
2N f
2
E
(2 N )
'f
=
2N f
2
G
S18-34
2 'f
'
f
(2 N )
f
+ 'f
(2 N )
(2 N )
(2 N )
f
'
f
'
f
(2 N f )b + (1 + p ) 'f (2 N f )c
=
2
2G
(1 + e ) 'f
(2N f )b + (1 + p ) 'f (2N f )c
=
2
E
2 (1 + e ) 'f
=
2N
2
3E
S18-35
'f
(2 N )
f
Cylindrical
notched specimen
with axial sine
loading
-250
maximum principal
Stress(MPa)
3
Seconds
250
-250
minimum principal
Stress(MPa)
3
Seconds
250
Stress(MPa)
Tension
-250
3
Seconds
250
Stress(MPa)
-250
Compression
3
Seconds
250
-250
Stress(MPa)
3
Seconds
Screen 1
S18-36
VonMises Stress/Strain
f
3
3 f
f
f
2
2 f
1 .5 f
If you compare the results of these methods for axial and torsion there can be differences
of up to a factor of 2 on stress and strain
PAT318, Section 18,March 2002
S18-37
They dont account for the known fact that fatigue failure occurs in
specifically oriented planes. Rather these approaches average the
stresses/strains to obtain a failure criterion with no regard to the
direction of crack initiation.
Tresca and von Mises are not sensitive to the hydrostatic stress or
strain
S18-38
Axial Stress:
Shear Stress:
x = sin t
xy =
cos t
3
1
=
x 2 + x 2 + 6 xy 2
2
= (No Alternating Stress)
= No Fatigue Damage?
n
S18-39
n
n
n
n
This method is based on the concept of relative von Mises Strain equivalent to signed von Mises strain for proportional loadings
The ASME pressure vessel code uses the equivalent strain
parameter:
No path dependence
Non-conservative for non-proportional loading
No directionality
Not sensitive to hydrostatic stress
2
11 22
) (
2
+ 22 33
S18-40
) (
2
+ 33 11
2
2
2
+ 6 12 + 23 + 31
a~0
0<a<1
stress
criterion
Absolute
Maximum
Principal
Absolute
Maximum
Principal
Absolute
Maximum
Principal
strain
criterion
Absolute
Maximum
Principal
Any
Tresca
S18-41
OK
p constant
Proportional
Multiaxial
Non-Proportional
Multiaxial
p constant
Increasing
Difficulty
(and Rarity)
a= 0
Need a
-1 < a < +1
Tricky
p may vary
a may vary
Decreasing
Confidence
S18-42
When the loading is no longer uniaxial, the uniaxial stress strain curve
is no longer enough on its own
Both these methods extend the use of the von Mises criterion to post
yield behaviour
Both methods assume fixed principal axes and fixed ratio of stresses
or strains
S18-43
q q
q =
+
'
n'
2
+ v'
1
a=
2
1 + v'
1
PAT318, Section 18,March 2002
q
1 1
v' = ve
E q
2 2
S18-44
1=q
1 = q
1 1
1 = * + *
1 v' a
1 a + a 2
n*
1
1 a + a
E
=
1- ve a e
*
S18-45
ae = 0
ae = -1
1
PAT318, Section 18,March 2002
S18-46
q q = q,e
q,e = 1,e
1 a e +a e 2
1 a e ve
S18-47
2
= 1
1
3 = q
v' (1 + a)
1- a + a 2
S18-48
2 = a 1
S18-49
= e e
e
e
e
e
N
N
N
N
ij ij + ij ij = ij ij + ij ij
S18-50
BUCZYNSKI-GLINKA METHOD
n
Additionally some assumptions are required, e.g. that the ratios of the
increments of strains, stresses or total strain energy in certain
directions are the same for the elastic as the elastic-plastic case.
Glinka-Buczynski use total strain energy
S18-51
S18-52
S18-53
When the biaxiality ratio is negative (type A), the maximum shear
plane where cracks tend to initiate is oriented as shown in the
diagram.
u
When the biaxiality is positive (type B), however, the cracks tend to be
driven more through the thickness.
u
In the early stages of initiation the type A cracks grow mainly along the
surface in mode 2 (shear), before transitioning to Mode 1 normal to the
maximum principal stress.
These are therefore more damaging for the same levels of shear strain.
S18-54
S18-55
n
n
n
S18-56
S18-57
(a) Torsion
1
Shear Strain on the plane of maximum shear will extend the fatigue
crack
u
Amongst other things, progress will be opposed by the friction between the
crack faces
The separation of the cracked faces due to the presence of the normal
strains in case b, will eliminate friction. Consequently the crack tip
experiences all the applied shear load. Hence this case is more
damaging.
PAT318, Section 18,March 2002
S18-58
+ n = C
2
u
S18-59
Normal Strain
Smith-Watson-Topper-Bannantine
Shear Strain
Fatemi-Socie
Wang-Brown
Wang-Brown with Mean Stress Correction
S18-60
u
u
S18-61
u
u
S18-62
SMITH-TOPPER-WATSON-BANNANTINE METHOD
u
u
S18-63
FATEMI-SOCIE METHOD
n
u
u
u
S18-64
n f
=
2N f
2
E
Normal Strain
SWT - Bannantine
f 2
n
2N f
n ,max =
2
E
Shear Strain
(1 + e ) f
=
2N f
2
E
Fatemi-Socie
(1 + e )
1 + n n ,max =
f 2 N f
E
y
) (
S18-65
2b
+ f 2 N f
+ f f 2 N f
b+ c
) + (1 + ) ( 2 N )
b
+ 1 + p f 2 N f
n(1 + e ) f 2
2 E y
c
2N f
n 1 + p f f
2 y
2b
2N f
b+ c
WANG-BROWN METHOD
n
S18-66
WANG-BROWN METHOD
n
Material Parameter S
S18-67
WANG-BROWN METHOD
f 2. n , m ean
m ax + S . n
=
2N
1 + + S (1 )
E
S18-68
+ f 2 N
Theta=45
90
120
60
150
30
180
1E-9
1E-8
1E-7
1E-6
210
330
240
300
270
S18-69
Life
(Repeats)
Normal Strain
106,000
SWT-Brannantine
316,000
Shear Strain
18,500
Fatemi-Socie
27,000
Wang-Brown
30,500
Wang-Brown + Mean
26,000
At Node 1045:
Max Stress Range = 508 Mpa
S18-70
97,300
Life (Cycles)
Material: Manten
Normal Strain
4.12E+07
SWT-Brannantine
2.80E+04
Shear Strain
1.41E+05
Fatemi-Socie
1.70E+05
Wang-Brown
6.63E+06
Wang-Brown + Mean
8.55E+05
2.88E+07
2.88E+07
8.41E+06
S18-71
DANG-VAN METHOD
n
S18-72
After shakedown, the important factors for fatigue are the amplitude of
the microscopic shear stresses and the magnitude of the hydrostatic
stress
S18-73
(t ) + a ph(t ) b 0
where (t) and ph(t) are the maximum microscopic shear stress and
the hydrostatic stress at time t in the stabilized state. They can be
calculated from:
1
*
( t ) = Tresca Sij ( t ) + devij
2
S18-74
1
ph(t ) = xx + yy + zz (t )
3
S18-75
DANG-VAN PLOT
(t)
Damage
occurs here !!!
+ a ph b = 0
ph(t)
a ph +b = 0
S18-76
* dev *
ij
S18-77
S18-78
S18-79
SUMMARY OF APPROACH
n
S18-80
A MULTIAXIAL ASSESSMENT
Perform crack
initiation analysis
of a knuckle.
Multiple (12)
loading inputs.
Assess
multiaxiality.
S18-81
12 loads associated
with 12 FE results
Force(Newtons)
LOAD03.PVX
84.71
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 84.71
Min Y = -50.05
-50.05
0
500
1000
1500
point
Force(Newtons)
LOAD02.PVX
7720
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 7720
Min Y = -7998
-7998
0
500
1000
1500
point
Force(Newtons)
LOAD01.PVX
3769
Sample = 1
Npts = 1610
Max Y = 3769
Min Y = -2654
-2654
0
500
1000
1500
point
S
creen 1
S18-82
S18-83
Angle Spread
Mean Biaxiality
S18-84
EXERCISE
n
S18-85
S18-86
SECTION 19
FATIGUE CRACK PROPAGATION
S19-1
S19-2
n
n
n
S19-3
Stress (s)
S19-4
S19-5
Kt=(1+2a/b)
Kt=3
S19-6
b = 0 --> Kt =
S19-7
MECHANICS OF CRACKS
General form of K
K = Y a where the geometry function
Y = Y (a/w, B, ... )
S19-8
S19-9
S19-10
S19-11
K CONTROLLED FRACTURE
K Controls the
stress around the tip
Fracture
Zone
Plastic
Zone
In small scale yielding K controls everything near the tip - plasticity - void
growth - cracking
Fracture occurs when K = KIC (The Fracture Toughness)
S19-12
1
rp =
6
K
y
1
rp (a, t , b, w,...)
25
S19-13
S19-14
Reversed plasticity
Corrosion
S19-15
S19-16
da
--dN
K = Y a
S19-17
PROPAGATION RATES
S19-18
n
n
n
n
n
S19-19
S19-20
overloads
corrosion effects
surface roughness
S19-21
Kmin
R=
Kmax
S19-22
SHORT CRACKS
n
SHORT CRACKS:
u
NOTE:
long cracks do not grow if
K is smaller than a
threshold value Kth.
S19-23
S19-24
ENVIRONMENT
Crack growth rates are
higher in corrosive
environments (e.g. salt
water) than in air.
They are the lowest in
vacuum.
S19-25
CALCULATING LIFETIMES
n
Need:
u
u
u
u
u
S19-26
S19-27
EFFECTIVE K APPROACH
n
da
= f (K , R, K TH , K IC , history , environment )
dN
n
MSC.Fatigue Method
S19-28
n
n
n
n
n
closure/short crack
notch field influence
static fracture mode contribution
history effects
environmental effects
da = C Keffm
a = a+da (if no fast fracture, go to next cycle)
S19-29
IMPLEMENTATION IN MSC.FATIGUE
Time Cycle
Counter
Geometry
function
Library
KSN
TCY
MDB
CRACK GROWTH
ANALYSER
CRG
S19-30
Materials
Database
Manager
n
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
u
Cycle-by-Cycle Modelling
Time-sequenced Rainflow Cycle
Counting
Multi-environment Material Properties
Kitagawa Minimum Crack Sizing
Threshold Modelling
Crack Closure and Retardation
User Defined Life
Fracture Toughness Failure Criterion
Surface or Embedded Cracks
Modified Paris Law
(modified Willenborg model)
S19-31
SUMMARY OF APPROACH
n
S19-32
Design analysis
Pre-prediction of test programs
Inspection strategy
Failure investigation
Decision support
S19-33
Lug problem
Single load
S19-34
S19-35
S19-36
S19-37
S19-38
S19-39
EXERCISE
n
S19-40
SECTION 20
SPOT WELD FATIGUE
S20-1
S20-2
MOTIVATION
s
s
s
S20-3
CURRENT PRACTICE
s
S20-4
s
s
S20-5
Spotweld Nugget
Beam Element
S20-6
Loading
(Time History)
Fatigue Analysis
(Spot Weld Analyzer)
Material
(Weld S-N Data)
Optimization
& Testing
PAT318, Section 20, March 2002
S20-7
Post
Processing
S20-8
My
Fy
Fz
Fy
Fx
Fz
Fz
Mx
Fx
Mx
Fx
Mx
Nugget
Sheet 2
S20-9
Sheet 1
r ,max =
r
Fx, y
ds
Fy
Fz
.
= 1744 2
s
.
r ,max = 1872
s
My
Fx
s
M x, y
ds 2
S20-10
Mx
S20-11
S20-12
k
Pk( t )
(t ) =
Pk
s
S20-13
S20-14
S20-15
S20-16
Multiple
loading inputs
at shock tower.
S20-17
S20-18
S20-19
S20-20
S20-21
EXERCISE
S20-22
SECTION 21
MSC.FATIGUE SOFTWARE STRAIN GAUGE
S21-1
S21-2
S21-3
A Finite Element tool allowing the creation of Stress and Strain time
histories at arbitrary locations on a Finite Element Model Surface
Uses:
x
x
S21-4
DESCRIPTION
s
The results from static, transient or quasi static finite element loading.
S21-5
CORRELATION APPLICATIONS
s
1000
9 pts/Secs
Displayed:
4501 points.
from pt 1
Strain (uE)
Max = 999
at 0
Min = -495
at 1743
Mean = 385.3
S.D. = 235
-600
RMS = 451.3
Time (Secs)
500
x
x
x
Cycle Counts
PSD results
Damage / Life Values
Z Units :
16
Cycles
Z-Axis
0
999
0
Mean
uE
Y-Axis
Range
uE
X-Axis
1508.9
S21-6
-495
Software
Strain
Gauges
FEA Model Surface
Hub Strain
Hub Strain
time
PAT318, Section 21, March 2002
time
S21-7
When calculating fatigue life for welded structures the loading direction
is of importance
S21-8
Software
Strain Gauges
FEA Model
S21-9
GAUGE DEFINITION
s
Uni-axial Gauges
T Gauges
Delta Gauges
Rectangular Gauges
Planar and stacked formulations.
S21-10
IMPLEMENTATION
s
Gauge position:
x
x
x
Gauge results:
x
x
x
S21-11
Multiple loading
inputs.
S21-12
and elements
that define
surface
Define node
to initially put
gage on ...
S21-13
S21-14
PERFORM ANALYSIS
s
s
s
S21-15
CORRELATION TECHNIQUES
s
s
s
s
S21-16
EXERCISE
S21-17
S21-18
SECTION 22
VIBRATION FATIGUE ANALYSIS
S22-1
S22-2
OVERVIEW
n
n
n
n
S22-3
time
time
Output
Transfer
Function
frequency
PSD Stress
Input
PSD
Frequency
Domain
Hub Stress
Wind speed
Time Domain
frequency
S22-4
n
n
S22-5
Material
Fatigue Analysis
(S-N analysis)
(Vibration Fatigue)
Geometry
(S-N Analysis)
Optimization
& Testing
S22-6
Post
Processing
TIME
HISTORY
RAINFLOW
COUNT
STRESS
RANGE
HISTOGRAM
FATIGUE
LIFE
STRESS
RANGE
HISTOGRAM
Transient
Analysis
FREQUENCY DOMAIN
PSD
FATIGUE
MODELLER
FATIGUE
LIFE
Transfer
M0
M1
M2
Function
M
4
S22-7
BLACK
BOX
FATIGUE
LIFE
|FFT|
Time history
A
FFT
time
frequency
Argument of FFT
The argument of the FFT gives
the phase angle of the
sinusoidal wave
S22-8
If the magnitude of the complex FFT is plotted, then the area under the spike
is found to be the amplitude A of the sine wave. When the argument of the
complex FFT is plotted then the area is found to be initial phase angle of
the sine wave.
S22-9
WHAT IS A PSD?
In a PSD we are only interested in the amplitude of each sine wave and are
not concerned with the phase relationships between the waves.
def
Definition
PSD
1
= 2T
FFT 2
PSD
frequency
PSD
PAT318, Section 22, March 2002
S22-10
( f )d f
(Stress)2
( f ) f
In practice,
m0, m1, m2 and m4
are sufficient to
compute all of the
information required
for the subsequent
fatigue analysis
fk
Hz
Gk(f)
Frequency, Hz
S22-11
G ( f )d f =
(Stress)2
G( f
)f
m2
E0 =
m0
fk
m4
EP =
m2
Hz
Gk(f)
Frequency, Hz
These statistical parameters are needed for
subsequent fatigue analyses.
PAT318, Section 22, March 2002
S22-12
E0
m22
=
=
EP
m0 m4
Stress (MPa)
Time History
E[0] = 3
x
x
Number of peaks,
E[P] = 6
x
time
Irregularity factor,
1 second
S22-13
E[0]
E[P]
= 3
6
p(S)
S t dS
P(S i)
dS
Stress Range (S)
S22-14
DIRLIK SOLUTION
p( S ) D = f ( m0 , m1 , m2 , m4 )
D1
e
Q
p (S ) D =
where;
D2 =
z=
S
2 m0
1 D1 + D
1 R
2
1
Z
Q
D2 Z
2
e 2R + D 3 Z e
R2
2 m0
m2
=
m0 m4
m1
m2
xm =
m0
m4
D1 =
Z
2
2 ( xm 2 )
1+ 2
x m D 12
125 ( D 3 D 2 R) R =
.
D3 = 1 D1 D2 Q =
1 D 1 + D 12
D1
S22-15
Dirlik
Chaudhury
& Dover
Wirsching
Hancock
Steinberg
Electronic
components (USA)
PAT318, Section 22, March 2002
Tunna
Narrow Band
S22-16
Developed for
offshore use
Railway
engineering
(UK)
The original solution
TIME
HISTORY
RAINFLOW
COUNT
STRESS
RANGE
HISTOGRAM
FATIGUE
LIFE
Transient
Analysis
STRESS
RANGE
HISTOGRAM
FREQUENCY DOMAIN
PSD
FATIGUE
MODELLER
FATIGUE
LIFE
Transfer
M0
M1
Function
M2
M
4
S22-17
BLACK
BOX
FATIGUE
LIFE
SUMMARY OF FEATURES
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
S22-18
DISPLAY OF NOISE.PSD
8E-5
0
0
nCode nSoft
Frequency (Hz.)
1500
PROCESS ALTERNATIVES
n
S22-19
S22-20
SINGLE LOAD
Time-domain Analysis
(static FE result)
Frequency-domain Analysis
(At Frequency = 0 Hz)
Frequency-domain Analysis
(one of several frequencies)
S22-21
S22-22
S22-23
S22-24
RESULTS:
Static case:
Combined loads
S22-25
EXERCISE
S22-26
SECTION 23
MSC.FATIGUE UTILITIES
S23-1
S23-2
UTILITIES OVERVIEW
n
n
n
data manipulation
data translation
data filtering
statistical & frequency analysis
local and test based fatigue analysis
S23-3
Note:
u
u
u
S23-4
S23-5
n
n
n
n
n
n
n
S23-6
MATHEMATICAL MANIPULATION
OF DATA - ART
S23-7
S23-8
rear g2(g)
A0 4 .DAC
10
5
0
-5
-10
0
20
40
60
80
100
rear g2(g)
120
s ecs
3A0 4 .DAC
10
5
0
-5
-10
0
20
40
60
80
100
120
s ecs
S creen 1
S23-9
rear g2(g)
10
A04.DAC
5
0
-5
-10
10
20
30
rear g2(g)
secs
3A04.DAC
10
5
0
-5
-10
10
20
30
secs
Screen 1
S23-10
Shortens loading time histories by retaining only the maxima & minima
(turning points). Gating can be used to ignore small cycles by absolute or
percentage values.
Maintains phase across channels by considering all channels
simultaneously. If a turning point is found in any input channel, the
corresponding point is written to all the output .pvx files.
PAT318, Section 23, March 2002
S23-11
S61.DAC
1 0 00
Spike on all 3
-2 0 0
0
10
20
S am ple = 409.6
N pt s
= 1.354E 4
Max Y = 928.8
Min Y = -0.344
30
seco n d s
Gauge 2(uE)
S62.DAC
20
S am ple = 409.6
N pt s
= 1.354E 4
Max Y = 15.83
Min Y = -119.8
-1 2 0
0
10
20
30
seco n d s
Gauge 3(uE)
S63.DAC
800
S am ple = 409.6
N pt s
= 1.354E 4
Max Y = 722.4
Min Y = -485.6
-6 0 0
0
10
20
30
seco n d s
Screen 1
S61.PVX
1 0 00
-2 0 0
20 0 0
4000
6 0 00
8 0 00
S am ple = 1
N pt s
= 1.022E 4
Max Y = 928.8
Min Y = -0.344
1E4
p o in t
20
Gauge 2(uE)
S62.PVX
S am ple = 1
N pt s
= 1.022E 4
Max Y = 15.83
Min Y = -119.8
-1 2 0
20 0 0
4000
6 0 00
8 0 00
1E4
p o in t
Gauge 3(uE)
S63.PVX
800
S am ple = 1
N pt s
= 1.022E 4
Max Y = 722.4
Min Y = -485.6
-6 0 0
20 0 0
4000
6 0 00
8 0 00
1E4
p o in t
Screen 1
S23-12
A
0
4.D
A
C
re r g
a
2 (
g
)
- 1
- 2
. 2
time
. 4
. 6
( s ec s )
3 A 0 4 .D A C
rear
g2
(g)
-1
-2
13
1 3 .2
ti m e
1 3 .4
(s e c s )
S23-13
1 3 .6
S23-14
DISPLAY OF SPIKES.ADA
DISPLAY OFSPIKES.ADA
100
P r o b .
.
C u m
T im
2000
P o in t C o u n t
D e n
a t le v e l ( s e c o n d s )
1.2
DISPLAY OF SPIKES.ADA
C o u n ts
0.08
DISPLAY OF SPIKES.ADA
0
-1442.3682
Strain (uE)
1496.079
-1442.3682
0
Strain (uE)
1496.079
-1442.3682
S23-15
0.2
Strain (uE)
1496.079
2.9443359
Rise (uE)
2941.3915
1500
S tra i n (u E )
-1500
0
SP I K ES.DAC
10
s
e
c
o
n
d
s
1500
R un ning
M a x (u E )
SP I K ES.M
AX
-1500
2
10
s
1500
R un ning
M i n (u E )
R un ning
M e a n (u E )
R un ning
Abs
SP I K ES.M N
I
-1500
2
10
s
1500
-1500
SP I K ES.M
EA
10
s
1500
M a x (u E )
SP I K ES.ABS
-1500
2
10
s
896.1
R un ning
R M S (u E )
SP I K ES.R M
S
114.7
2
10
s
861.9
R un ning
S D (u E )
R un ning
A re a (u E )
38.68
SP I K ES.R SD
10
s
59.91
-52.8
SP I K ES.AR E
10
s
Screen 1
S23-16
FILTERING
n
n
S23-17
Low Pass
High Pass
Band Pass
Band Reject
Time Domain
n
n
n
n
S23-18
Low Pass
High Pass
Band Pass
Band Reject
FREQUENCY ANALYSIS
n
n
S23-19
n
n
n
PSD
u
Area under PSD =
Mean square amplitude
ASD
u
Area under ASD =
amplitude
ESD
u
ESD = PSD x Time
Real & Imaginary
Magnitude & Phase of FFT
S23-20
0
0
20
G01.SXX
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 2.924E
-3
M
in Y = 0
100
Hz.
1.611E
-3
20
G01.SYY
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 1.611E
-3
M
in Y = 6.655E
-7
100
Hz.
1.352E
-3
0
0
20
G01.SXY
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 1.352E
-3
M
in Y = 0
100
Hz.
2.632
Gain(No units)
0.1248
0
20
G01.GAI
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 2.632
M
in Y = 0.1248
100
Hz.
180
Phase(Degrees)
-179.9
0
20
G01.PHA
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 180
M
in Y = -179.9
100
Hz.
0.9959
Coherence(No units)
0
0
20
G01.COH
40
60
80
S
am
ple = 10
N
pts = 1024
M
ax Y = 0.9959
M
in Y = 0
100
Hz.
Screen 1
S23-21
434
A Pillar(uE)
STRAIN.PVX
Sa mple = 1
N pts = 3 98 5
M a x Y = 43 4
M in Y = -7 15 .9
-715.9
0
1000
2000
3000
Point
418.2
Magnitude(uE)
STRRM.DAC
Sa mple = 1
N pts = 3 98 4
M a x Y = 41 8 .2
M in Y = -7 06 .9
-706.9
0
1000
2000
3000
Seconds
425.4
Magnitude(uE)
STRMM.DAC
Sa mple = 1
N pts = 3 98 4
M a x Y = 42 5 .4
M in Y = -7 07 .7
-707.7
0
1000
2000
3000
Seconds
392.9
Magnitude(uE)
STRMKV.DAC
Sa mple = 1
N pts = 3 98 5
M a x Y = 39 2 .9
M in Y = -7 14
-714
0
1000
2000
3000
Seconds
434
Strain(uE)
-706.9
0
STRIRF.DAC
Sa mple = 1
N pts = 3 98 5
M a x Y = 43 4
M in Y = -7 06 .9
1000
2000
3000
Seconds
Screen 1
S23-22
S23-23
n
n
n
n
n
S23-24
10.67
Cycles
Damage %
224.2
0
0
4174
Range
Cycle
Damage
Compares number of cycles with the damage contribution of that stress or strain range
PAT318, Section 23, March 2002
S23-25
1273
Load History
OS_LSW.DAC
-1 2 6 .3
-1 5 2 6
D a m a ge
Time
Correlated
C um . D a m a ge
Damage
Cumulative
Fatigue
Damage
20
40
60
TIM E S E C S .
S23-26
80
100
A
d
o
o
o
d/4
d/8
r
M
t
Kt = 0.22 +
1
------------------0.2
0.4
(r/t) . (h/t)
M
t
3
Nominal stress = M / ( 3.142 d / 32 )
In this case r / d = 0.1
S23-27
Mohrs Circle
Calculates strain
components from
rosette
Biaxiality ratio vs
Principal plots
Angle vs Principal
plots
Elastic- plastic
conversion
Gauge : Rectangular
E1 =
1000
500
500
uE
PRS.MAX
uE
E3 =
SPRING SEAT(UE)
uE
E2 =
530.7
-78.67
0
20
40
60
80
100
S E C S .
Principals :
Max =
1104
uE
Min =
396
uE
Shear =
707
-23
degs.
-135.9
SPRING SEAT(UE)
PRS.MIN
uE
Angle =
from Grid 1
-687.6
0
20
40
60
80
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = -135.9
Min Y = -687.6
100
S E C S .
343.4
SPRING SEAT(UE)
PRS.ABS
S13101.ABS
Strain
UE
-687.6
0
20
40
60
80
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = 343.4
Min Y = -687.6
100
S E C S .
5 0 0 0
668.6
SPRING SEAT(UE)
PRS.SHR
4 0 0 0
Domin t B
an
iaxiality Ratio -->
3 0 0 0
-1151
0
2 0 0 0
20
40
60
80
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = 668.6
Min Y = -1151
100
S E C S .
1 0 0 0
89.78
Angle(Deg rees)
PRS.ANG
-1 0 0 0
-1
-0 .5
0 .5
-89.98
0
20
40
60
80
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = 89.78
Min Y = -89.98
100
S E C S .
S13101.ABS
Strain
UE
0.4018
PRS.BAX
5 0 0 0
-0.9427
0
4 0 0 0
20
40
60
80
100
S E C S .
3 0 0 0
<-- Domin
at An
gle to th Z
e
ero G
au
ge
2 0 0 0
1 0 0 0
0
-1 0 0 0
-1 0 0
-5 0
0
Angle (Degrees)
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = 530.7
Min Y = -78.67
S23-28
5 0
1 0 0
Sample = 74
Npts = 8294
Max Y = 0.4018
Min Y = -0.9427
Data Conversion
u
u
u
Other Functions
u
u
u
u
u
S23-29
EXERCISE
n
S23-30