Вы находитесь на странице: 1из 10

 I Wallerstein: "Rise and future demise" Comp Stud in Soc & Hist #16 sept 1974

(both IWs also in IW: Capitalist World Economy) #: 1


 R Brenner: "Origins of capitalist development: a critique of neo-smithian
marxism" New Left Review # 104 July 1977, p. 25-93: 1
 D North: "Institutions," J. of Economic Perspectives 5:1 Winter 1991, pp. 97-113:
1
 Dessler, David (1989). "What's at Stake in the Agent Structure Debate?"
International Organization 43:3 (Summer) 441-73: 18
 Giddens, Anthony (1979). Central Problems in Social Theory: Action, Structure
and Contradiction in Social Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press: 1
o Giddens, Anthony. 1984. The Constitution of Society: Outline of the
Theory of Structuration. Berkeley: 1
 Gourevitch, Peter (1978). "The Second Image Reversed: The International
Sources of Domestic Politics." International Organization 32:4 (Autumn) 881-
912: 2
 Mearsheimer, John. "The False Promise of International Institutions",
International Security, vol. 19, no. 2, 1994/1995, pp 5-49: 1
o John Mearsheimer, ‘Back to the Future: Instability in Europe After the
Cold War,’ International Security 15:1 (1990) 5-56: 1
 Keohane, Robert O. & Martin, Lisa. L., "The Promise of Institutionalist Theory",
International Security, vol. 20, no. 1, 1995, pp 39-51: 1
o Ruggie, John G., "The False Promise of Realism", Ibid, pp. 62-70: 1
o Keohane, R., (ed.), Neorealism and its Critics (Columbia, 1986): 4
o Keohane, Robert O., "Theory of World Politics", in Keohane,
International Institutions and State Power, pp. 35-73: 1
o Robert O. Keohane, “International Institutions: Two Approaches,”
International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 32, 1988, pp. 379-396: 2
o Robert O. Keohane, "Neoliberal Institutionalism: A Perspective on World
Politics," chap. 1 in his International Institutions and State Power: Essays
in International Relations Theory (Boulder, CO: Westview, 1989): 1
o Robert O. Keohane, After Hegemony: Cooperation and Discord in the
World Political Economy (Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press,
1984): 1
o Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, Power and Interdependence, ch. 1-
3: 2
o Robert O. Keohane and Joseph S. Nye, "Power and Interdependence
Revisited," International Organization 41 (Autumn 1987): 1
 Hedley Bull, The Anarchical Society (New York: Columbia University Press,
1977: 4
 Buzan, Barry, Richard Little and Charles Jones. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy:
Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press: 3
 F. Kratochwil, Rules, Norms, and Decisions: 1
o Friedrich Kratochwil, Of Systems, Boundaries, and Territoriality, WP 39/1
(Oct. 1986), 27-52: 1

Identity: 1
o Kratochwil, Friedrich and John Gerard Ruggie. 1986. “International
Organization: a State of the Art on an Art of the State.” International
Organization 40, no. 4 (Autumn): 753- 775: 1
 Brodbeck, May. 1968. "Methodological Individualisms: Definition and
Reduction," in M. Brodbeck (ed.) Readings in the Philosophy of the Social
Sciences, NY: MacMillan & Co., pp. 280-303: 1
 La Palombara, Joseph. 1968. "Macrotheories and Microapplications in
Comparative Politics," Comparative Politics, 1: 52-78: 1
 Sartori, Giovanni. 1970. "Concept Misinformation in Comparative Politics,"
American Political Science Review, 64:1033-1053: 1
 Taylor, Michael. 1989. "Structure, Culture and Action in the Explanation of
Social Change," Politics and Society, 17:115-162: 1
 Nicholas G. Onuf, "Constructivism: A User's Manual." In Vendulka Kubalkova,
Nicholas Onuf, and Paul Kowert, eds., International Relations in a
Constructed World. Armonk, NY: M.E. Sharpe, 1998, pp. 58-78: 2
o Nicholas G. Onuf, "Constructivism." Chapter 1 in World of Our Making.
Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1989, pp. 35-65: 3
 John G. Ruggie, “Constructing the World Polity.” London: Routledge: 1
o John Gerrard Ruggie, "Continuity and Transformation in the World Polity:
Toward a Neorealist Synthesis." World Politics 35 (1983), pp. 261-285: 4
o John Ruggie, Territoriality and Beyond: Problematizing Modernity in IR,
IO 47/1 (Winter 1993), 139-74: 1
o Ruggie, John G., "The False Promise of Realism", Ibid, pp. 62-70: 1
 Peter L. Berger and Thomas Luckmann, The Social Construction of Reality: A
Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. New York: Doubleday, 1966: 1
 Jeffrey T. Checkel, "The Constructivist Turn in International Relations Theory,"
World Politics 50 (January 1998): 324-48: 1
 Ted Hopf, "The Promise of Constructivism in International Relations Theory,"
International Security 23 (Summer 1998): 171-200: 1
 Robert Jervis, " Realism, Neoliberalism, and Cooperation: Understanding the
Debate," International Security 24 (Summer 1999): 42-63: 1
o Robert Jervis, System Effects: Complexity in Political Life (Princeton:
Princeton University Press, 1997), chapters 1-4: 1
o Jervis, Robert, "Perception and the Level-of-Analysis Problem," ch. 1, in
Perception and Misperception in International Politics: 5
o Robert Jervis, "Realism, Game Theory, and Cooperation." World Politics
40 (1988), pp. 317-350. 8: 1
o Robert Jervis, "Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma," World Politics,
30 (January 1978) as excerpted in Art and Waltz (eds.) The Use of Force,
pp. 34-64: 1
o Robert Jervis. 1990. "Models and Cases in the Study of International
Conflict." Journal of International Affairs 44: 81-101: 1
 Jerel A. Rosati, "The Power of Human Cognition in the Study of World Politics,"
International Studies Review 2 (Fall 2000): 45-75: 1

Identity: 2
 Paul Schroeder, "Historical Reality vs. Neo-realist Theory," International Security
19 (Summer 1994): 108-48: 2
 Janice Gross Stein, "Building Politics Into Psychology: The Misperception of
Threat," Political Psychology 9 (June 1988): 245-71: 1
 Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading: Addison-Wesley,
1979), chs. 3- 6: 5
o Kenneth Waltz, “The Emerging Structure of International Politics,”
International Security, vol. 18, 2 (1993), pp. 44-79: 1
o Kenneth Waltz, Man, the State, and War: 10
o Kenneth Waltz, ‘Structural Realism After the Cold War,’ International
Security 25:1 (2000) 5-41: 1
 Helen Milner, “The Assumption of Anarchy in International Relations Theory,”
Review of International Studies Vol. 17, No. 1 (1991): 1
o Helen Milner, "Trading Places: Industries for Free Trade," World Politics,
vol. 40, no. 3 (April 1988), pp. 350-376: 1
o Helen Milner, "International Theories of Cooperation among States:
Strengths and Weaknesses." World Politics 44 (1992), pp. 466-496: 1
 David Andrews, “Capital Mobility and State Autonomy,” International Studies
Quarterly 38 (1994), pp. 193-218: 1
 Joao Resende-Santos, "Anarchy and the Emulation of Military systems: Military
Organization and Technology in South America, 1870-1914," Security Studies 5,
3 (Spring 1996): 1
 Randall Schweller, “Tripolarity and the Second World War,” International
Studies Quarterly, vol. 37 (1993): 1
 Straussfogel, D. 1997. "World Systems Theory: Toward a Heuristic and
Pedagogic Conceptual Tool." Economic Geography 73:118-130: 1
 Chase-Dunn, C. 1998. Global Formation: Structures of the World-Economy.
(second edition). New York: Rowman and Littlefield: 1
o Chase-Dunn, C. and T. Hall. 1993. "Comparing World-Systems: Concepts
and Working Hypotheses." Social Forces 72:851-886: 1
 J. David Singer, "The Level-of-Analysis Problems [in International Relations]," in
Klaus Knorr and Sidney Verba, eds., The International System, pp. 77-92 (also
published in World Politics, vol. 14, October 1961): 9
o David Singer. 1969. "The Incompleat Theorist: Insight Without
Evidence." In James N. Rosenau & Klaus Knorr, eds., Contending
Approaches to International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University
Press, pp. 63-86: 1
o Singer, J. David. 1965. “System Transformation.” In J. David Singer, ed.
Human Behaviour and International Politics. Chicago, IL: Rand McNally
and Co.: 453-457: 1
o J. David Singer, "The Level-of-Analysis Problem in International
Politics," in Rosenau, ed., International Politics and Foreign Policy (1969),
chap. 7: 1
 Margaret Archer, Realist Social Theory: 1

Identity: 3
 William H. Sewell, "A Theory of Structure: Duality, Agency and
Transformation," AJS, (1992), 98:1-29. Youssef Cohen, Radicals, Reformers, and
Reactionaries, (1994), pp. 1-52: 1
 Walter Carlsnaes, "The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy Analysis,"
ISQ, (1992), 36: 245-270: 2
 Wolfers, Arnold, Discord and Collaboration, ch. 1, pp. 3-24: 5
 Berkowitz, Bruce (1986) Levels of Analysis Problems in International Studies: 1
 Pollard, Vincent Kelly (1994) Breaking Through a Stalemate: Decolonizing the
"Levels-of-Analysis" Problematique. Manuscript: 1
 M. Lichbach, "Social Theory and Comparative Politics," in M. Lichbach and A.
Zuckerman Comparative Politics: Rationality, Culture, and Structure, 1997,
Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 239-276: 2
 Baldwin, D. (ed.), Neorealism and Neoliberalism (Columbia, 1993): 1
 Booth, K., and S. Smith, eds., International Relations Theory Today (Penn. State,
1995): 4 (Smith, S., "The Self-Images of a Discipline: A Genealogy of
International Relations Theory"), (Barry Buzan, ‘The Timeless Wisdom of
Realism?), (Vasquez, John A., "The Post-Positivist Debate,") n(Buzan, Barry.
1995. “The Level of Analysis Problem Reconsidered.”)
o Barry Buzan, ‘The Timeless Wisdom of Realism?’ in International
Theory: Positivism and Beyond. Steve Smith, Ken Booth and Marysia: 1
o Ken Booth, ‘Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and
Practice,’ International Affairs 67:3 (1991) 527-545: 1
 George, J., Discourses of Global Politics: A Critical (Re)Introduction to
International Relations (Lynne Rienner, 1994): 2
 Hollis, M., and S. Smith, Explaining and Understanding International Relations
(Oxford, 1991): 2
 Emmanuel Adler, "Seizing the Middle Ground: Constructivism in World
Politics," European Journal of International Relations, September 1997: 1
o Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford, eds., Progress in International
Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 403-437: 1
 Richard Berk, "Causal inference for sociological data," in Handbook of Sociology
edited by Neil Smelser (Sage, 1988): 1
 Richard Boyd, Philip Gasper, and J. D. Trout, eds., The Philosophy of Science
(MIT, 1991): 1
 Thomas Cook and Donald Campbell, Quasi-Experimentation (Rand McNally) pp.
14-36: 1
 Paul Diesing, How Does Social Science Work? (Univ. Of Pittsburgh Press, 1991):
2
 Jon Elster, Nuts and Bolts for the Social Sciences: 1
 Clifford Geertz, "Thick Description" and "Notes on a Balinese Cockfight" : 1
 John Gunnell, "Realizing Theory: The Philosophy of Science Revisited," Journal
of Politics Vol. 57 no. 4 (November, 1995) pp. 923-940.
 Hawthorn, Plausible Worlds
 Carl Hempel, "The Function of General Laws in History," in his Aspects of
Scientific Explanation: 1

Identity: 4
o Carl G. Hempel, Philosophy of Natural Science. Prentice-Hall, 1966.
Chap. 4. (pp. 33-46) (Packet): 1
 Mark Hoffmann, "Critical theory and the Inter-Paradigm Debate," Millenium Vol.
16, No. 2 (1987) pp. 231-250: 2
 Philip Kitcher, The Advancement of Science: Science Without Legend,
Objectivity Without Illusioins (Oxford, 1993): 1
 Robert Klee, Introduction to the Philosophy of Science (Oxford, 1997): 1
 Thomas Kuhn, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions: 1
o Thomas Kuhn “The Historical Structure of Scientific Discoveries,”: 1
 Larry Laudan, Beyond Positivism and Relativism; Progress and its Problems: 1
 Daniel Little, Varieties of Social Explanation (Westview, 1991) pp. 13-38, 222-
238: 1
 Richard Miller, Fact and Method, 1987: 1
 Karl Popper, The Logic of Scientific Discovery: 1
 Clayton Roberts, The Logic of Historical Explanation: 1
 Wesley Salmon, Four Decades of Scientific Explanation, 1989: 1
 Wesley Salmon, Causality and Explanation, 1998: 1
 Andrew Sayer, Method in Social Science: A realist approach (Routledge, 1992)
pp. 1-11, 103-117, 121-136, 204-231: 1
 Michael Sobel, "Causal Inference in the Social and Behavior Sciences," in
Gerhard Arminger, Clifford Clogg, and Michael Sobel, eds., Handbook of
Statistical Modeling for the Social and Behavioral Sciences (Plenum Press, 1995):
1
 Arthur Stinchcombe, Constructing Social Theories: 1
 Peter Winch, The Idea of a Social Science, 1958/1990: 1
 William Wohlforth, "Reality Check: Revising Theories of International Politics in
Response to the End of the Cold War," World Politics Vol. 50, No. 4 (July 1998)
pp. 650-680: 1
 James Rosenau, "Pre-Theories and Theories of Foreign Policy," in Barry Farrell,
ed., Approach to Comparative and International Politics, pp. 88-92: 3
o Rosenau & Klaus Knorr, eds., Contending Approaches to International
Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press, pp. 63-86: 1
 Graham Allison, "Conceptual Models and the Cuban Missile Crisis," American
Political Science Review, vol. 63, September 1969, pp. 689-718: 1
 Scott Sagan, "Why Do States Build Nuclear Weapons? Three Models in Search of
a Bomb," International Security, vol. 21, Winter 1996/97, pp. 54-86: 2
 L.L. Farrar, "The Limits of Choice: July 1914 Reconsidered," Journal of Conflict
Resolution, March 1972, vol. 16, pp. 1-24: 2
 Paul Kennedy, "The Kaiser and German Weltpolitik: reflections on Wilhelm II's
place in the making of German foreign policy," in John C.G. Rohl and Nicolaus
Sombart, eds: 2
 Andrew Linklater, The Achievements of Critical Theory,” in Steve Smith et. al.,
eds. International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1996, (1997), pp. 279-300: 1

Identity: 5
o Andrew Linklater, ‘The Transformation of Political Community: E.H.
Carr, Critical Theory and International Relations,’ Review of International
Studies 23:3 (1997) 321-338: 1
 Fred Halliday, “The Future of International Relations: Fears and Hopes,” in
Smith, pp. 318-327: 1
 Stephen D. Krasner, "State Power and the Structure of Foreign Trade," World
Politics, vol. 28, no. 3 (April 1976), pp. 317-348: 1
o In KRASNER, ed., International Regimes 0 IO 36, 2 (1982), are some of
the earliest papers: 1
o Krasner, “Structural Causes and Regime Consequences,” 185-206: 1
o Stephen Krasner, Sovereignty: An Institutional Perspective, Comparative
Political Studies 21 (1988), 66-94: 1
o Stephen Krasner, Sovereignty: Organized Hypocrisy (Princeton, 1999): 1
 Robert W. Cox, "Gramsci, Hegemony, and International Relations: An Essay in
Method," Millenium, vol. 12, no. 2 (Summer 1983), pp. 162-175: 1
o Robert W. Cox, ‘Civil Society at the Turn of the Millennium: Prospects
for an Alternative World Order,’ Review of International Studies
25:1(1999) 3-28: 1
o Robert W. Cox, ‘Social Forces, States and World Orders: Beyond
International Relations Theory,’ in Approaches to World Order, Robert W.
Cox with Timothy Sinclair (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,
1996) 85-123: 1
 Stephan Haggard, "Structuralism and Its Critics: Recent Progress in International
Relations Theory," in Emanuel Adler and Beverly Crawford, eds., Progress in
International Relations (New York: Columbia University Press, 1991), pp. 403-
437: 1
 Isabelle Grunberg, "Exploring the 'Myth' of Hegemonic Stability," International
Organization, vo. 44, no. 4 (Autumn 1990), pp. 431-478: 1
 Imre Lakatos, "Falsification and the Methodology of Scientific Research
Programs." In Imre Lakatos and Alan Musgrave, eds., Criticism and the Growth
of Knowledge. Cambridge University Press, 1970, pp. 91-138. (Packet): 1
 Charles Lave and James G. March Introduction to Models in the Social Sciences.
Harper and Row, 1975 or University Press of America, 1991, Chapters 1-3, pp.1-
84. (Packet): 2 (Chap. 6)
 Gary King, Robert O. Keohane and Sidney Verba, eds., Designing Social Inquiry:
Scientific Inference in Qualitative Research. Princeton University Press, 1994: 2
 Fearon, James D.1991. “Counterfactuals and Hypothesis Testing in Political
Science” World Politics 43(1): 169-95: 1
 Stern, Steve "Feudalism, Capitalism and the World-System in the Perspective of
Latin America and the Caribbean" in Cooper et al Confronting Historical
Paradigms: 1
 Kenneth Oye, "Explaining Cooperation Under Anarchy: Hypotheses and
Strategies," World Politics 38 (1985), pp. 1-24: 1

Identity: 6
o Kenneth Oye (ed.), Cooperation Under Anarchy, chapters by Oye, pp. 1-
27 and Axelrod and Keohane, pp. 226-254. (Reprinted from World
Politics October 1985.): 1
 David Lake, "Anarchy, Hierarchy, and the Variety of International Relations."
International Organization 50 (1996), pp. 1-35: 1
 Robert Powell, "Anarchy in International Relations Theory: The Neorealist-
Neoliberalist Debate." International Organization 48 (1994), pp. 313-344: 1
 David Long, "The Harvard School of Liberal International Theory: A Case for
Closure." Millennium 24 (1995), pp. 489-506: 1
 Hans Morgenthau, Politics Among Nations (any edition after the first), pp. 4-13: 1
 Pauline Rosenau, "Once Again into the Fray: International Relations Confronts
the Humanities." Millennium 19 (Spring 1990): 83-110: 1
 Mercer, Jonathan. 1995. “Anarchy and Identity.” International Organization 49/2
(Spring) 229-252: 1
 Gries, Peter H. 2000. “Identity and Conflict in International Relations.” Paper
presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association,
Washington DC, Sept. 3, 2000: 1
 Copeland, Dale C. 2000. “The Constructivist Challenge to Structural Realism”
International Security, 25/2 (Fall) 187-212: 1
 Buzan, Barry, Richard Little and Charles Jones. 1993. The Logic of Anarchy:
Neorealism to Structural Realism. New York: Columbia University Press: 3
o Barry Buzan and Richard Little, ‘Why International Relations Has Failed
as an Academic Project and What to do about it,’ Millennium: Journal of
International Studies 30:1 (2001): 19-39: 1
o Barry Buzan, From International System to International Society, IO 47
(1993), 327-52: 1
o Buzan, Barry. 1995. “The Level of Analysis Problem Reconsidered.” In
International Relations Theory Today, eds. Ken Booth and Steve Smith.
Oxford: Polity Press: 2
 James D. Morrow, "Social Choice and System Structure in World Politics,"
World Politics 41 (October, 1988), 75-97: 1
 Timothy J. McKeown, "The Limitations of 'Structural' theories of commercial
policy," International Organization 40 (Winter 1986), 43-64: 1
 Paul Anderson and Timothy J. McKeown, "Changing Aspirations, Limited
Attention, and War," World Politics 40 (October, 1987) 1-29: 1
 Stanley Hoffmann. 1959. "International Relations: The Long Road to Theory.
World Politics 11: 346-377: 1
o Stanley Hoffman, ‘An American Social Science: International Relations
(1977)," in International Theory: Critical Investigations, James Der
Derian, ed. (London: Macmillan, 1995: 1
 Morton Kaplan. 1966. "The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in
International Relations." World Politics 19: 1-20: 1
 Bruce Bueno de Mesquita. 1985. "Toward a Scientific Understanding of
International Conflict: A Personal View." International Studies Quarterly 29: 121-
136: 1

Identity: 7
 Yosef Lapid. 1989. "The Third Debate: On the Prospects of International Theory
in a Post-Positivist Era." International Studies Quarterly 33: 235-254: 2
 Adam Jones, ‘Does “Gender” Make the World Go Round? Feminist Critiques of
International Relations,’ Review of International Studies, 22: 4 (1996) 405-429: 1
 Andrew Moravcsik, ‘Taking Preferences Seriously: A Liberal Theory of
International Politics,’ International Organization 51:4 (1997) 513-553: 1
 Beate Jahn, ‘One Step Forward, Two Steps Back: Critical Theory as the Latest
Edition of Liberal Idealism,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 27: 3
(1998) 613-641: 1
 Chris Brown, ‘“Turtles All the Way Down”: Anti-Foundationalism, Critical
Theory and International Relations,’ Millennium: Journal of International Studies
23 (1994) 213-236: 1
 Christopher Layne, ‘Kant or Cant: The Myth of the Democratic Peace,’
International Security, 19: 2 (1994) 5-49: 1
 David Held and Anthony McGrew, ‘The End of the Old Order? Globalisation and
the Prospects for World Order,’ Review of International Studies 219-243: 1
 J. Ann Tickner, ‘You Just Don’t Understand: Troubled Engagements Between
Feminists and IR Theorists,’ International Studies Quarterly 41: 4 (1997) 611-
632: 1
 Jill Hills, ‘Dependency Theory and Its Relevance Today: International Institutions
in Telecommunications and Structural Power,’ Review of International Studies,
20: 2 (1994) 169-186: 1
 John Lewis Gaddis, ‘International Relations Theory and the End of the Cold
War,’ International Security 17: 3 (1992) 5-58: 1
 Jutta Weldes, ‘Constructing National Interests,’ European Journal of International
Relations 2:3 (1996) 275-318: 1
 Michael W. Doyle, ‘Liberalism and World Politics,’ in American Political
Science Review 80:4 (1986) 1151-1169: 1
 Ole Wæver, ‘The Sociology of Not So International a Discipline: American and
European Developments in International Relations,’ International Organization
52:4 (1998) 687-727: 1
 Raymond Cohen, ‘Pacific Unions: A Reappraisal of the Theory that
“Democracies do not go to War with Each Other,”’ Review of International
Studies 20:3 (1994) 207-223: 1
 Robert L. Rothstein, ‘On the Costs of Realism,’ in Political Science Quarterly
87:3 (1972) 347-362: 1
 Stephen Walt, ‘The Renaissance of Security Studies,’ International Studies
Quarterly (1991) 211-239: 1
 Tarak Barkawi and Mark Laffey, ‘The Imperial Peace: Democracy, Force and
Globalisation,’ European Journal of International Relations 5:4 (1999) 403-434: 1
 Tim Dunne, ‘The Social Construction of International Society,’ European Journal
of International Relations, 1: 3 (1995) 367-389: 1
 William Wallace, 'Truth and Power, Monks and Technocrats: Theory and Practice
in International Relations,' Review of International Studies 22:3 (1996) 301-321:
1

Identity: 8
 Joseph Nye, "Neorealism and Neoliberalism" World Politics 40 (1988), pp. 235-
251: 1
o NYE, Bound to Lead: Chapter 1, 25-48: 1
 Doran, “Power Cycle Theory of Systems Structure: commonalities and
Complementarities,” 83-110: 1
o DORAN, The Politics of Assimilation: Hegemony … Aftermath (1971):
“Elements of Assimilation,” 32-58: 1
 YOUNG, “International Regimes,” World Politics 39 (1986), 104-122: 1
 MANSBACH, The Global Puzzle: “Ch. 4. Issues and Actors in World Politics”
and “Ch. 5. Beyond the Nation State: A World of Many Actors”: 1
 Nicholas Lemann, “The Quiet Man,” New Yorker, 5 May 2001: 56-71: 1
 Schelling, Thomas. 1978. Micromotives and Macrobehavior. New York: W. W.
Norton: 1
 Mastunduno, Michael, David Lake, and G. John Ikenberry. 1989. “Toward a
Realist Theory of State Action.” International Studies Quarterly. 33/4(December),
457-474: 1
 Janice Thomson, State Practices, International Norms, and the Decline of
Mercenarism, ISQ 34 (1990), 23-47: 1
o Janice Thomson, Mercenaries, Pirates, and Sovereigns (Princeton, 1994):
1
o Janice Thomson, State Sovereignty in International Relations: Bridging
the Gap between Theory and Empirical Research, ISQ 39/2 (June 1995),
213-33: 1
 J. Samuel Barkin and Bruce Cronin, The State and the Nation: Changing Norms
and Rules of Sovereignty in IR, IO 48/1 (Winter 1994): 107-30: 1
 Ringmar, The Relevance of International Law, RIS: 1
 Carlsnaes, Walter. 1992. “The Agency-Structure Problem in Foreign Policy
Analysis.” International Studies Quarterly 36 (September): 245-270: 3
 G. John Ikenberry, David A. Lake, and Michael Mastanduno, "Introduction:
approaches to explaining American foreign economic policy."International
Organization, 42/1 (Winter 1988), pp. 1-14: 1
 William Roberts Clark, "Agents and Structures: Two Views of Preferences, Two
Views of Institutions." International Studies Quarterly, 42, 2 (June 1998), 245-
270: 1
 Gil Friedman and Harvey Starr, Agency, Structure, and International Relations:
From Ontology to Empirical Inquiry. New York: Routledge, 1997: 1
 Richard K. Ashley, "Untying the Sovereign State," Millennium 17 (1989): 1
o Ashley, “The Poverty of Neorealism” 255-300: 1
 Timothy W. Luke, "Discourses of Disintegration, Texts of Transformation: Re-
Reading Realism in the New World Order," Alternatives 18 (1993): 1
 Der Derian, James and Michael Shapiro, eds., International/Intertextual Relations:
Post-Modern Readings of World Politics (Lexington: Lexington Books, 1989): 1
o James Der Derian, Antidiplomacy: 1
 Daniel Byman and Kenneth Pollack, "Let Us Now Praise Great Men: Bringing the
Statesman Back In," International Security, vol. 25, Spring 2001, pp. 107-46: 1

Identity: 9
 Jonathan Bendor and Thomas Hammond, "Rethinking Allison's Models," APSR,
vol. 86, June 1992, pp. 301-22: 1

Identity: 10