Florida End-Of-Course Assessments Algebra 1, Geometry, Biology 1 AND U.S. History

Iune 2014
"#$%

ILCkIDA LND-CI-CCUkSL ASSLSSMLN1S
ALGL8kA 1, GLCML1k, 8ICLCG 1
AND
U.S. nIS1Ck

"#$%

2

I|or|da Lnd-of-Course Assessments
Grades 6-12
1he llorlda Lnd-of-Course (LCC) AssessmenLs are compuLer-based, crlLerlon-referenced LesLs LhaL
measure Lhe !"#$ &"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0. (nCSSS) for speclflc courses, as ouLllned ln Lhelr
course descrlpLlons. 1he flrsL assessmenL Lo begln Lhe LranslLlon Lo LCC LesLlng ln llorlda was Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL ln sprlng 2011. CeomeLry and 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenLs were admlnlsLered
for Lhe flrsL Llme ln sprlng 2012, Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL was admlnlsLered for Lhe flrsL Llme ln
sprlng 2013, and Lhe Clvlcs LCC AssessmenL was admlnlsLered for Lhe flrsL Llme ln sprlng 2014. nexL
year, llorlda wlll LranslLlon Lo new end-of-course assessmenLs deslgned Lo measure sLudenLs' masLery of
Lhe new llorlda SLandards ln MaLhemaLlcs. 1hese new assessmenLs wlll replace Lhe currenL LCC
assessmenLs admlnlsLered ln maLhemaLlcs (Algebra 1 and CeomeLry). 1he 8lology 1, u.S. PlsLory and
Clvlcs LCC AssessmenLs wlll conLlnue Lo be admlnlsLered nexL school year, and reLake admlnlsLraLlons of
Lhe nCSSS Algebra 1 and CeomeLry LCC AssessmenLs wlll be offered for graduaLlon and course
compleLlon purposes. uurlng Lhe flrsL year of lmplemenLaLlon, each new LCC assessmenL ls
admlnlsLered only ln Lhe sprlng. CurrenLly, afLer Lhe lnlLlal sprlng admlnlsLraLlon, each LCC assessmenL ls
also admlnlsLered ln Lhe summer, fall and wlnLer.

SLudenL resulLs ln Lhls medla packeL lnclude Lhe comblned resulLs for Lhe LesL admlnlsLraLlons offered
LhroughouL Lhe school year. 1hese assessmenLs are ouLllned on Lhe noLes pages precedlng each sub[ecL
area's secLlon. ln addlLlon, sLudenL performance ln Lhls medla packeL represenLs only sLudenL resulLs for
flrsL-Llme LesL Lakers durlng Lhe school year.

1he success a sLudenL has achleved wlLh Lhe nCSSS assessed by Lhe LCC assessmenLs ls lndlcaLed by
AchlevemenL Levels LhaL range from 1 (lowesL) Lo 3 (hlghesL). AchlevemenL Levels are esLabllshed by Lhe
SLaLe 8oard of LducaLlon afLer Lhe flrsL sLaLewlde LesL admlnlsLraLlon and a sLandard-seLLlng process LhaL
lncludes educaLor and sLakeholder lnpuL. u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL AchlevemenL Levels were
esLabllshed by Lhe SLaLe 8oard on !anuary 21, 2014. SLudenL performance on Lhe lnlLlal year of each LCC
assessmenL presenLed ln Lhls medla packeL ls reporLed uslng Lhe adopLed AchlevemenL Level sLandards.
1hls was done so sLakeholders can compare school years and see how sLudenLs would have performed lf
Lhe AchlevemenL Levels had been esLabllshed aL LhaL Llme.

lor Lhe Clvlcs LCC AssessmenL, sLudenLs recelved a score on a scale of 20-80. 1hls scale, whlch ls only
used for Lhe flrsL sLaLewlde LesL admlnlsLraLlon of each LCC assessmenL, ls a speclal scale known as a 1-
score scale, and Lhe score LhaL sLudenLs recelve ls called a 1 score. 1hls lnformaLlon ls noL presenLed ln
Lhls medla packeL buL can be accessed on Lhe deparLmenL's webslLe aL
hLLp://fcaL.fldoe.org/medlapackeL/2014/pdf/2014uLCC8.pdf.

lor more lnformaLlon abouL LCC assessmenLs, please vlslL hLLp://fcaL.fldoe.org/eoc/.

"#$%

3
1he AchlevemenL Level deflnlLlons LhaL apply Lo LCC assessmenLs are provlded below, along wlLh Lhe
cuL scores LhaL deflne Lhe AchlevemenL Levels for each LCC assessmenL. 1he SLaLe 8oard has esLabllshed
Lhe mlnlmum score ln AchlevemenL Level 3 as Lhe passlng score for all LCC assessmenLs.

Leve| S: SLudenLs aL Lhls level demonsLraLe masLery of Lhe mosL challenglng conLenL of Lhe !"#$
&"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0..
Leve| 4: SLudenLs aL Lhls level demonsLraLe an above saLlsfacLory level of success wlLh Lhe
challenglng conLenL of Lhe !"#$ &"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0..
Leve| 3: SLudenLs aL Lhls level demonsLraLe a saLlsfacLory level of success wlLh Lhe challenglng
conLenL of Lhe !"#$ &"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0..
Leve| 2: SLudenLs aL Lhls level demonsLraLe a below saLlsfacLory level of success wlLh Lhe challenglng
conLenL of Lhe !"#$ &"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0..
Leve| 1: SLudenLs aL Lhls level demonsLraLe an lnadequaLe level of success wlLh Lhe challenglng
conLenL of Lhe !"#$ &"'"()$*+' ,-'./*'" ,$)$" ,$)'0)(0..

Ach|evement Leve|s for the I|or|da LCC Assessment Sca|e Scores (32S to 47S)
Assessment Leve| 1 Leve| 2
Leve| 3
(ass|ng)
Leve| 4 Leve| S
A|gebra 1 323-374 373-398 399-424 423-436 437-473
Geometry 323-369 370-393 396-417 418-433 434-473
8|o|ogy 1 323-368 369-394 393-420 421-430 431-473
U.S. n|story 323-377 378-396 397-416 417-431 432-473

lor Lhe sLaLewlde assessmenL of maLhemaLlcs ln 2013 and 2014, mlddle school sLudenLs may have Laken
a maLhemaLlcs LCC assessmenL only, Lhe lCA1 2.0 MaLhemaLlcs assessmenL for Lhelr grade level only, or
boLh. 1he charL on Lhe followlng page provldes lnformaLlon on Lhe performance of all mlddle school
sLudenLs who Look a sLaLewlde maLhemaLlcs assessmenL, regardless of Lhe Lype of assessmenL Laken.

1he Sprlng 2014 llorlda LCC AssessmenLs ress 8eleases may be accessed aL
hLLp://www.fldoe.org/news/2014/2014_06_13.asp.
"#$%

4

Grades 6-8, A|| Mathemat|cs Assessments
A|gebra 1 LCC, Geometry LCC and
ICA1 2.0 Mathemat|cs
8y Ach|evement Leve|

Cverall, Lhe performance of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on all
maLhemaLlcs assessmenLs, whlch lnclude Lhe Algebra 1 LCC, CeomeLry LCC and lCA1 2.0 MaLhemaLlcs
AssessmenLs, has remalned conslsLenL slnce 2011. Cver LhaL same perlod of Llme, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln
grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 and aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on all maLhemaLlcs
assessmenLs has lncreased 1 percenLage polnL.

ln 2014, 36 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC, CeomeLry LCC and lCA1 2.0 MaLhemaLlcs AssessmenLs. 1hls ls equal Lo 36 percenL ln 2013, 2012
and 2011. ln 2014, 29 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC, CeomeLry LCC and lCA1 2.0 MaLhemaLlcs AssessmenLs. 1hls ls an lncrease from 28 percenL ln
2013, 2012 and 2011. ln 2014, 22 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on
Lhe Algebra 1 LCC, CeomeLry LCC and lCA1 2.0 MaLhemaLlcs AssessmenLs. 1hls ls equal Lo 22 percenL ln 2013 and
an lncrease from 21 percenL ln 2012 and 2011.
Source: k20 LducaLlon uaLa Warehouse
llorlda ueparLmenL of LducaLlon, !une 2014
S6 S6 S6
S6
28
28 28
29
21 21 22 22
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
At or Above Ach|evement Leve| 3 (ass|ng)
At or Above Ach|evement Leve| 4
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

3
A|gebra 1 LCC Assessment
Grades 6-12
2014 Schoo| ear
NC1LS:
1) SLudenL performance on Lhe 2011 Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL presenLed ln Lhls medla packeL ls
reporLed uslng Lhe AchlevemenL Levels esLabllshed by Lhe SLaLe 8oard of LducaLlon ln uecember
2011. 1hls was done so sLakeholders can compare school years and see how sLudenLs would
have performed lf Lhe AchlevemenL Levels had been esLabllshed ln 2011.
2) ercenLages dlsplayed ln Lhls documenL for 2013 may reflecL mlnor dlfferences from
percenLages publlshed ln lasL year's medla packeL. 1hls ls because of Lhe lncluslon of summer
2013 resulLs and rouLlne updaLes made Lo sLudenL daLa subsequenL Lo lasL year's release.
3) Algebra 1 sLudenL performance ln Lhls medla packeL lncludes sLudenL resulLs for all flrsL-Llme
LesL Lakers for each admlnlsLraLlon durlng each school year.
Schoo| ear Adm|n|strat|ons
2010-11 Sprlng
2011-12 WlnLer, Sprlng, Summer
2013-14
lall, WlnLer, Sprlng (Summer noL
yeL admlnlsLered)

"#$%

6

Grades 6-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lmproved 10 percenLage
polnLs on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL slnce 2011. 1he percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 lmproved 11 percenLage polnLs slnce 2011, whlle Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs
performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 has lmproved (decreased) by 6 percenLage polnLs over Lhe same perlod of
Llme.

ln 2014, 63 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 64 percenL ln 2013, 39 percenL ln 2012 and 33 percenL ln 2011.
ln 2014, 28 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 27 percenL ln 2013, 22 percenL ln 2012 and 17 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 12
percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a
decrease from 13 percenL ln 2013, 13 percenL ln 2012 and 18 percenL ln 2011.

SS
S9
64
6S
17
22
27
28
18
1S
13
12
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

7
Grades 6-12

Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 conLlnue Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe sLudenLs on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. Slnce 2011, Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs have lmproved 14 percenLage polnLs, Plspanlc
sLudenLs lmproved 13 percenLage polnLs, and WhlLe sLudenLs have lmproved 8 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 73 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe
ln 2014, 30 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 48 percenL ln 2013, 40 percenL ln 2012 and 36
percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 63 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level
3 (asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 61 percenL ln 2013, 36 percenL ln 2012 and
30 percenL ln 2011.
6S
69
72
73
36
40
48
S0 S0
S6
61
63
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Wh|te Afr|can-Amer|can n|span|c
"#$%

8

Grades 6-12

Afrlcan-Amerlcan, Plspanlc and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL lncreased 1 percenLage polnL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 34 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 33 percenL ln 2013, 28 percenL ln 2012 and 23 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014,
13 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra
1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 14 percenL ln 2013, 9 percenL ln 2012 and 7 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014,
23 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 24 percenL ln 2013, 19 percenL ln 2012 and 14 percenL ln 2011.

23
28
33
34
7
9
14
1S
14
19
24
2S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

9
Grades 6-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) 10 percenLage polnLs slnce 2011. Cver Lhe same perlod of Llme, Lhe
percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 7 percenLage polnLs,
and WhlLe sLudenLs performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 3 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 8 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 9 percenL ln 2013, 10 percenL ln 2012 and 11 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 19
percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls a decrease from 13 percenL ln 2013, 17 percenL ln 2012 and 21 percenL ln 2011.

11
10
9
8
29
2S
21
19 21
17
1S
14
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

10

Grades 6-12
Students w|th D|sab|||t|es

SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL lmproved 7 percenLage polnLs slnce 2011, whlle Lhe percenLage
performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lmproved 4 percenLage polnLs slnce 2011.

ln 2014, 34 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 8 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 8 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 6 percenL ln 2012
and 4 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 33 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 33 percenL ln 2013, 36 percenL ln 2012 and 40
percenL ln 2011.
27
30
33
34
4
6
8 8
40
36
3S
33
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

11
Grades 6-12
Lng||sh Language Learners

Cverall, Lngllsh Language Learners' performance has lmproved on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL slnce 2011. 1he
percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and
aL AchlevemenL Level 1 has lmproved 13 percenLage polnLs slnce 2011, whlle Lhe percenLage performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 has lmproved 7 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 39 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 12 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 11 percenL ln 2013, 7 percenL ln
2012 and 3 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 31 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 34 percenL ln 2013, 37 percenL ln
2012 and 44 percenL ln 2011.
26
30
37
39
S
7
11
12
44
37
34
31
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

12

Grades 6, 7 and 8

Slnce 2011, Lhe performance of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 has lmproved on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL,
however, performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 has
decreased 1 percenLage polnL slnce 2013.

ln 2014, 90 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng). 1hls ls a
decrease from 91 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 87 percenL ln 2012 and 82 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 32
percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 33 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 49 percenL ln 2012 and 39 percenL ln
2011. ln 2014, 1 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls conslsLenL wlLh 1 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 2 percenL ln 2012 and 4 percenL ln 2011.

82
87
91
90
39
49
S3
S2
4
2
1 1
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

13
Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, WhlLe, Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) has lmproved slnce 2011, however, all Lhree groups of sLudenLs' performance decreased sllghLly
ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 92 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on
Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 94 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 91 percenL ln 2012
and 87 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 82 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 83 percenL ln 2013
and an lncrease from 72 percenL ln 2012 and 64 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 89 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln
grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a
decrease from 90 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 87 percenL ln 2012 and 80 percenL ln 2011.

87
91
94
92
64
72
83
82
80
87
90
89
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

14

Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, WhlLe, Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 has lmproved slnce 2011. ln comparlson Lo 2013, Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs' performance
remalned conslsLenL, whlle WhlLe sLudenLs' performance decreased 2 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 37 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 39 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 34 percenL ln 2012
and 44 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 36 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls conslsLenL wlLh 36 percenL ln 2013 and an
lncrease from 28 percenL ln 2012 and 19 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 49 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7
and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls conslsLenL wlLh 49
percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 47 percenL ln 2012 and 34 percenL ln 2011.

44
S4
S9
S7
19
28
36 36
34
47
49 49
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

13
Grades 6, 7 and 8
Ach|evement Leve| 1

ln 2014, Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on
Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL remalned conslsLenL ln comparlson Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 1 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 1 percenL ln 2013 and 2012 and a decrease from 2 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 3 percenL
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 3 percenL ln 2013, and a decrease from 6 percenL ln 2012 and 9 percenL ln 2011. ln
2014, 1 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 1 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 2 percenL ln 2012 and 4 percenL ln 2011.

2
1 1 1
9
6
3
3
4
2
1 1
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

16

Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, Lhe performance of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 has lmproved slnce 2011, however, Lhe
percenLage of Lhese sLudenLs performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 decreased sllghLly ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 80 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 82 percenL ln 2013 and lncrease from 73
percenL ln 2012 and 67 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 37 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8
performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 38 percenL
ln 2013 and an lncrease from 34 percenL ln 2012 and 23 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 4 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh
ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a
decrease from 3 percenL ln 2013, 6 percenL ln 2012 and 10 percenL ln 2011.

67
7S
82
80
23
34
38
37
10
6
S
4
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

17
Grades 6, 7 and 8

Slnce 2013, Lhe percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 lmproved 1 percenLage polnL, whlle Lhe percenLage performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng)
remalned conslsLenL and Lhe percenLage performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 1 percenLage
polnL.

ln 2014, 80 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 80 percenL ln 2013, and an lncrease from 66 percenL ln
2012 and 33 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 38 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL
or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 37 percenL ln 2013, 28
percenL ln 2012 and 18 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 4 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8
performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 3 percenL ln 2013, 9
percenL ln 2012 and 13 percenL ln 2011.
S3
66
80 80
18
28
37
38
13
9
S
4
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

18

Grades 9-12

Cverall, llorlda sLudenLs' performance ln grades 9-12 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce 2011.
Slnce 2013, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and
AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved 1 and 2 percenLage polnLs, respecLlvely, ln 2014 compared Lo 2013, whlle Lhe
percenLage performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 remalned conslsLenL.

ln 2014, 13 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 13 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 9 percenL ln 2012 and 7 percenL ln 2011. ln
2014, 18 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL.

41
46
S0
S1
7
9
13
13
2S
21
20
18
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

19
Grades 9-12

Cverall, performance of WhlLe, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce 2011. 1he percenLage of
WhlLe and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 2
percenLage polnLs and Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs lncreased 1 percenLage polnL ln 2014
compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 39 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 30 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level
3 (asslng) on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 48 percenL ln 2013, 44 percenL ln 2012 and
37 percenL ln 2011.
S1
SS
S8
60
28
32
38
39
37
44
48
S0
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

20

Grades 9-12

ln 2014, Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL lncreased 1 percenLage polnL, whlle Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 remalned conslsLenL compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 17 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 16 percenL ln 2013, 12 percenL ln 2012 and 10 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 7
percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 7 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 4 percenL ln 2012 and 3 percenL ln 2011.
ln 2014, 13 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra
1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 13 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 9 percenL ln 2012 and 3 percenL ln
2011.
10
12
16
17
3
4
7 7
S
9
13
13
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

21
Grades 9-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he percenLage of WhlLe, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level
1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) sLeadlly slnce 2011. ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe
percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1
decreased by 2 percenLage polnLs, whlle Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs decreased by 1 percenLage polnL.

ln 2014, 13 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 14 percenL ln 2013, 13 percenL ln 2012 and 17 percenL 2011. ln 2014, 23
percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL.

17
1S
14
13
3S
30
27
2S
28
23
22
20
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
"#$%

22

Grades 9-12

SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 have lncreased Lhelr performance on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL slnce
2011. 1he percenLage of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 LhaL performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) lncreased 1 percenLage polnL, and Lhe percenLage performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 decreased 2
percenLage polnLs.

percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 4 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 4 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 3 percenL ln 2012
and 2 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 37 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 39 percenL ln 2013, 40 percenL ln 2012 and 44
percenL ln 2011.
22
2S
27
28
2
3
4 4
44
40
39
37
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

23
Grades 9-12

Cverall, Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL ln 2014. 1he
percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and
aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved 2 percenLage polnLs, whlle Lhe percenLage performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 lmproved 1 percenLage polnL ln comparlson Lo 2013.

percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 10 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 9 percenL ln 2013, 6 percenL ln
2012 and 4 percenL ln 2011. ln 2014, 34 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe Algebra 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 36 percenL ln 2013, 38 percenL ln
2012 and 46 percenL ln 2011.
24
28
33
3S
4
6
9
10
46
38
36
34
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2011 2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

24

Grades 6-12
A|gebra 1 LCC Assessment kesu|ts
ercentage Compar|son by D|str|ct
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
Change of Students at
Leve| 3 and Above 2013 2014
S1A1LWIDL 64 6S 1
ALACnUA 63 69 4
8AkLk 66 62 -4
8A 61 62 1
8kADICkD 40 49 9
8kLVAkD 69 68 -1
8kCWAkD 63 63 0
CALnCUN 76 83 7
CnAkLC11L 62 62 0
CI1kUS 68 68 0
CLA 64 76 12
CCLLILk 71 73 2
CCLUM8IA 60 30 -10
MIAMI DADL 63 68 3
DLSC1C 30 43 -3
DIkIL 63 48 -17
DUVAL 39 37 -2
LSCAM8IA 68 66 -2
ILAGLLk 76 78 2
IkANkLIN 39 34 -3
GADSDLN 39 30 -9
GILCnkIS1 78 76 -2
GLADLS 63 81 18
GULI 68 74 6
nAMIL1CN 31 27 -4
nAkDLL 43 49 6
nLNDk 43 32 7
nLkNANDC 39 38 -1
nIGnLANDS 46 37 11
nILLS8CkCUGn 60 64 4
nCLMLS 63 39 -6
INDIAN kIVLk 37 39 2
IACkSCN 66 74 8
ILIILkSCN 16 38 22

1
1hls Lable lncludes sLudenL resulLs of flrsL-Llme LesL Lakers ln Lhe wlnLer, sprlng and summer admlnlsLraLlons for
Lhe prevlous year and fall, wlnLer and sprlng admlnlsLraLlons for Lhe currenL year.
"#$%

23
Grades 6-12
A|gebra 1 LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL 64 6S 1
LAIAL11L 76 88 12
LAkL 39 60 1
LLL 62 64 2
LLCN 64 73 9
LLV 69 66 -3
LI8Lk1 62 66 4
MADISCN 39 73 34
MANA1LL 63 64 1
MAkICN 37 60 3
MAk1IN 73 74 -1
MCNkCL 71 70 -1
NASSAU 70 73 3
CkALCCSA 77 73 -4
CkLLCnC8LL 62 33 -9
CkANGL 66 62 -4
CSCLCLA 33 38 3
ALM 8LACn 68 69 1
ASCC 63 63 2
INLLLAS 37 61 4
CLk 34 33 1
U1NAM 31 37 6
S1 ICnNS 87 83 -2
S1 LUCIL 31 61 10
SAN1A kCSA 67 79 12
SAkASC1A 73 77 4
SLMINCLL 72 74 2
SUM1Lk 74 72 -2
SUWANNLL 36 33 -1
1ALCk 74 63 -11
UNICN 67 74 7
VCLUSIA 63 69 4
WAkULLA 76 73 -1
WAL1CN 73 77 4
WASnING1CN 64 31 -13
"#$%

26

Geometry LCC Assessment
Grades 6-12
2014 Schoo| ear
NC1LS:
1) SLudenL performance on Lhe 2012 CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL presenLed ln Lhls medla packeL ls
3) CeomeLry sLudenL performance ln Lhls medla packeL lncludes sLudenL resulLs for all flrsL-Llme
2011-12 Sprlng
2013-14
lall, WlnLer, Sprlng (Summer noL
yeL admlnlsLered)

"#$%

27
Grades 6-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 conLlnue Lo lmprove on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1he percenLage of
sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 who performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 has lncreased 8 percenLage polnLs slnce 2012, wlLh a 1 percenLage-polnL lncrease ln 2014 compared Lo
2013.

CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 63 percenL ln 2013 and 36 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 34
percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls an lncrease from 33 percenL ln 2013 and 26 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 12 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12
performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 11 percenL ln 2013
and a decrease from 13 percenL ln 2012.
S6
63
64
26
33
34
1S
11
12
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

28

Grades 6-12

Calns made on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL by Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 from
2013 Lo 2014 narrowed Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe sLudenLs. ln 2014, Lhe overall performance of Plspanlc
and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs and 1 percenLage polnL, respecLlvely, compared Lo 2013.

CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 74 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 68 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014,
44 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on
Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 43 percenL ln 2013 and 33 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 61
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 39 percenL ln 2013 and 30 percenL ln 2012.

68
74 74
33
43
44
S0
S9
61
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

29
Grades 6-12

ln 2014, Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on
Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL conLlnued Lo narrow Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe sLudenLs. 1he percenLage of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 2 percenLage polnLs,
and Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs lncreased by 1 percenLage polnL.

ln 2014, 42 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 42 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 34 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 16 percenL
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 13 percenL ln 2013 and 10 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 31 percenL of Plspanlc
sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 29 percenL ln 2013 and 21 percenL ln 2012.

34
42
42
10
1S
16
21
29
31
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

30

Grades 6-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

Cverall, Lhe performance of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) slnce 2012, however, each of
Lhese subgroups lncreased 1 percenLage polnL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 7 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 6 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 8 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 21 percenL
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls an lncrease from 20 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 27 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 14 percenL of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 13 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 18 percenL ln 2012.

8
6
7
27
20
21
18
13
14
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

31
Grades 6-12

Cverall, Lhe performance of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce 2012.
Powever, ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe percenLage of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) decreased 1 percenLage polnL, Lhe percenLage aL AchlevemenL Level 1
lncreased 3 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 remalned conslsLenL.

(asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 34 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 28
percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 11 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 11 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 8
percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 32 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 29 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 33 percenL ln
2012.
28
34
33
8
11
11
33
29
32
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

32

Grades 6-12

Cverall, Lhe percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) conLlnued Lo lmprove on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL ln comparlson Lo 2012. 1he percenLage of
Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 who performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 1
percenLage polnL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013 and 8 percenLage polnLs slnce 2012.

(asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 30 percenL ln 2013 and 23 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 11 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 11 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 6 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 33
percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 33 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 40 percenL ln 2012.

23
30 31
6
11 11
40
33
3S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

33
Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, Lhe performance of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce
2012. Powever, ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 decreased 1 percenLage polnL, whlle Lhe percenLage performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) and aL AchlevemenL Level 1 remalned conslsLenL.

83 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 84 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 78 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 0
percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls
ls equal Lo 0 percenL ln 2013 and 2012.

96
97 97
78
84
83
0 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

34

Grades 6, 7 and 8

Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 conLlnue Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap. 1he percenLage of Afrlcan-
Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 4
percenLage polnLs ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 99 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 97 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 91 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 87 percenL ln 2013 and 89 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 97 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
percenL ln 2012.
97
99
98
89
87
91
9S
98 97
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

33
Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, Lhe performance of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce 2012. Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 have conLlnued Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh a 2 percenLage-polnL lncrease ln
2014 compared Lo 2013.

CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 89 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 83 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 63 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 81 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 73 percenL ln 2012.

83
89
87
S4
61
63
73
81 81
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

36

Grades 6, 7 and 8
Ach|evement Leve| 1

Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs' performance ln grades 6, 7 and 8 aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) by 1
percenLage polnL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 0 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 0 percenL ln 2013 and 2012. ln 2014, 1 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades
6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 2 percenL
ln 2013 and 2012. ln 2014, 0 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 0 percenL ln 2013 and 2012.

0 0 0
2 2 1
0 0 0
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

37
Grades 6, 7 and 8

SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 lmproved Lhelr performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 and aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013. ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe
percenLage of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng)
lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs, whlle Lhe percenLage performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 decreased 2 percenLage
polnLs.

(asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 93 percenL ln 2013 and equal Lo 93 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 73 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 73 percenL ln 2013 and equal Lo 73 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 0 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe
CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 2 percenL ln 2013 and 1 percenL ln 2012.

9S
93
9S
73
7S
73
1
2
0
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

38

Grades 6, 7 and 8

ln 2014, Lhe percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) ls conslsLenL wlLh Lhelr performance ln 2012. Powever, Lhe performance of Lngllsh Language
Learners performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 decreased,
whlle performance aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lncreased ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 83 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 89 percenL ln 2013 and equal Lo 83 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 36 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 63 percenL ln 2013 and 69 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 7 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe
CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 0 percenL ln 2013 and 4 percenL ln 2012.

8S
89
8S
69
63
S6
4
0
7
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

39
Grades 9-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 have lmproved Lhelr performance on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL slnce 2012.
lrom 2012 Lo 2014, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 8 percenLage polnLs, whlle performance aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 3 percenLage polnLs.

30 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 29 percenL ln 2013 and 22 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 13 percenL of sLudenLs ln
grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 12
percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 16 percenL ln 2012.
S3
61
61
22
29
30
16
12
13
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

40

Grades 9-12

Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 conLlnue Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe sLudenLs
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades
9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 1 percenLage polnL, Lhe performance of
Plspanlc sLudenLs lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe performance of WhlLe sLudenLs remalned conslsLenL.

42 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 37 percenL ln 2013 and 48 percenL ln 2012.

6S
72 72
32
41
42
48
S7
S9
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

41
Grades 9-12

Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 conLlnue Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe sLudenLs
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades
9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 1 percenLage polnL, Lhe performance of Plspanlc
sLudenLs lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe performance of WhlLe sLudenLs remalned conslsLenL.

ln 2014, 38 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an

31
38
38
8
13
14
18
26
28
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

42

Grades 9-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he performance of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) slnce 2012, however, all Lhree subgroups had
a sllghL decrease ln performance ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 8 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 7 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 9 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 22 percenL
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls an lncrease from 21 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 28 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 13 percenL of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 14 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 19 percenL ln 2012.

9
7
8
28
21
22
19
14
1S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

43
Grades 9-12

Cverall, SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL remalned conslsLenL from 2013 Lo 2014, whlle Lhelr performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level
3 (asslng) and aL AchlevemenL Level 1 decllned over Lhe same perlod of Llme.

percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 10 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 10 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 7
percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 33 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 29 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 34 percenL ln
2012.
28
33
32
7
10 10
34
29
33
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

44

Grades 9-12

1he performance of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL remalned conslsLenL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013,
however, Lhe percenLage performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs over Lhe same perlod
of Llme.

(asslng) on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 30 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 22 percenL ln
2012. ln 2014, 11 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4
on Lhe CeomeLry LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 11 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 6 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 33 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe CeomeLry
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 33 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 40 percenL ln 2012.

22
30 30
6
11 11
40
33
3S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

43
Grades 6-12
Geometry LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL 63 64 1
ALACnUA 73 68 -3
8AkLk 60 31 -9
8A 64 66 2
8kADICkD 39 43 -14
8kLVAkD 73 70 -3
8kCWAkD 63 63 0
CALnCUN 71 72 1
CnAkLC11L 66 60 -6
CI1kUS 76 69 -7
CLA 67 66 -1
CCLLILk 70 67 -3
CCLUM8IA 31 21 -30
MIAMI DADL 39 63 4
DLSC1C 63 37 -6
DIkIL 72 64 -8
DUVAL 36 34 -2
LSCAM8IA 74 74 0
ILAGLLk 73 72 -3
IkANkLIN 62 39 -3
GADSDLN 29 29 0
GILCnkIS1 72 76 4
GLADLS 31 32 1
GULI 74 84 10
nAMIL1CN 42 29 -13
nAkDLL 63 41 -22
nLNDk 33 33 0
nLkNANDC 38 39 1
nIGnLANDS 63 30 -13
nILLS8CkCUGn 67 64 -3
nCLMLS 49 48 -1
IACkSCN 61 61 0
ILIILkSCN 23 21 -2

1
"#$%

46

Grades 6-12
Geometry LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL 63 64 1
LAIAL11L 43 79 36
LAkL 34 38 4
LLL 36 62 6
LLCN 78 70 -8
LLV 64 62 -2
LI8Lk1 47 43 -4
MADISCN 30 33 3
MANA1LL 70 63 -7
MAkICN 39 33 -4
MAk1IN 70 74 4
MCNkCL 84 72 -12
NASSAU 82 67 -13
CkALCCSA 73 72 -1
CkLLCnC8LL 67 33 -14
CkANGL 60 63 3
CSCLCLA 30 33 3
ALM 8LACn 63 69 6
ASCC 64 67 3
INLLLAS 66 61 -3
CLk 30 30 0
U1NAM 38 64 6
S1 ICnNS 84 88 4
S1 LUCIL 44 31 7
SAN1A kCSA 73 74 1
SAkASC1A 73 72 -1
SLMINCLL 74 73 1
SUM1Lk 61 68 7
SUWANNLL 64 70 6
1ALCk 37 61 4
UNICN 30 79 29
VCLUSIA 67 67 0
WAkULLA 72 73 3
WAL1CN 32 76 24
WASnING1CN 67 62 -3
"#$%

47

8|o|ogy 1 LCC Assessment
Grades 6-12
2014 Schoo| ear
NC1LS:
1) SLudenL performance on Lhe 2012 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL presenLed ln Lhls medla packeL ls
3) 8lology 1 sLudenL performance ln Lhls medla packeL lncludes sLudenL resulLs for all flrsL-Llme LesL
Lakers for each admlnlsLraLlon durlng each school year.
2011-12 Sprlng
2013-14
lall, WlnLer, Sprlng (Summer
noL yeL admlnlsLered)

"#$%

48

Grades 6-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed hlgher on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL ln 2014. 1he percenLage of
sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above AchlevemenL Level
4 lncreased 2 percenLage polnLs ln 2014 compared Lo 2013.

ln 2014, 68 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology
1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 66 percenL ln 2013 and 39 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 30 percenL of
sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 28 percenL ln 2013 and 22 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 9 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed
aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 10 percenL ln 2013 and 14
percenL ln 2012.
S9
66
68
22
28
30
14
10
9
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

49
Grades 6-12

Cverall, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL lmproved ln 2014. Slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of
Afrlcan-Amerlcan and Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng)
lncreased by 10 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs lncreased by 9 percenLage polnLs.

8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 77 percenL ln 2013 and 70 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 48 percenL
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1
LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 47 percenL ln 2013 and 38 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 64 percenL of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 61 percenL ln 2013 and 34 percenL ln 2012.

70
77
79
38
47
48
S4
61
64
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

30

Grades 6-12

1he percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has conLlnued Lo lncrease slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of
Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 3 percenLage
polnLs, whlle Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc and WhlLe sLudenLs lncreased by 9 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 39 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1
Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC

30
37
39
9
12
14
17
23
26
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

31
Grades 6-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level
1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs decreased by 7 percenLage polnLs, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs decreased by 6 percenLage
polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs decreased by 3 percenLage polnLs slnce 2012.

ln 2014, 3 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 6 percenL ln 2013 and 8 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 18 percenL of Afrlcan-
Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a
decrease from 19 percenL ln 2013 and 23 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 11 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6-12
performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 13 percenL ln 2013
and 17 percenL ln 2012.

8
6
S
2S
19
18
17
13
11
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

32

Grades 6-12

Cverall, Lhe performance of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has
lmproved slnce 2012, wlLh performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreaslng by 7 percenLage
polnLs and performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreaslng by 3 percenLage polnLs.

(asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 37 percenL ln 2013 and 31 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 10 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 9 percenL ln 2013 and 7 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 23 percenL of
SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls
ls a decrease from 27 percenL ln 2013 and 33 percenL ln 2012.
31
37
38
7
9 10
33
27
2S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

33
Grades 6-12

Cverall, Lngllsh Language Learners' performance on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved slnce 2012. Slnce
Lhen, Lhe percenLage of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) lncreased 3 percenLage polnLs, Lhe percenLage performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 1
percenLage polnL, and Lhe percenLage performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 6 percenLage
polnLs.

(asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 21 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 16 percenL ln
on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 3 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 2 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 40 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 6-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1
.
16
21 21
2
3 3
46
39
40
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

34

Grades 6, 7 and 8

1he percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) has sLeadlly
lncreased slnce 2012 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. Slnce Lhen, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8
performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 3 percenLage polnLs, whlle Lhe percenLage
performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 1 percenLage polnL.

of sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls
ls a decrease from 63 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 33 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 1 percenL of sLudenLs ln
grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 2
percenL polnLs ln 2013 and 2012.

89
91
92
S3
63
S9
2 2
1
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

33
Grades 6, 7 and 8

Plspanlc and Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 conLlnue Lo close Lhe achlevemenL gap wlLh WhlLe
sLudenLs on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. Slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7
and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 9 percenLage polnLs, Lhe percenLage of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 3
percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 3 percenLage polnLs.

Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 93 percenL ln 2013 and 93 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 84
percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on
Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 80 percenL ln 2013 and 73 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 93
percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe
8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 90 percenL ln 2013 and 88 percenL ln 2012.

93
9S
96
7S
80
84
88
90
93
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

36

Grades 6, 7 and 8

Cverall, Lhe performance of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has lncreased slnce 2012, however, all Lhree
subgroups had a decrease ln Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 from 2013 Lo
2014.

8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 73 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 63 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 41 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on
Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 44 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 38 percenL ln 2012.
ln 2014, 33 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 37 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 48 percenL ln 2012.

63
7S
73
38
44
41
48
S7
SS
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

37
Grades 6, 7 and 8
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan, Plspanlc and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL lmproved (decreased) ln 2014 compared Lo 2013. 1he percenLage of
Plspanlc and WhlLe sLudenLs decreased 1 percenLage polnL and Lhe percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs
decreased 2 percenLage polnLs slnce 2013.

ln 2014, 0 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls
a decrease from 6 percenL ln 2013 and equal Lo 4 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 1 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln
grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 2
percenL ln 2013 and 2012.

2
1
0
4
6
4
2
2
1
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

38

Grades 6, 7 and 8

SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology
1 LCC AssessmenL lncreased 9 percenLage polnLs slnce 2012, and Lhe percenLage performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 16 percenLage polnLs over Lhe same perlod of Llme.

2014, 39 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on
Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 44 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 23 percenL ln 2012.
ln 2014, 9 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 6, 7 and 8 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe
8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 8 percenL ln 2013 and a decrease from 20 percenL ln 2012.

61
69
70
23
44
39
20
8
9
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

39
Grades 9-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL ln 2014 compared Lo 2013 and
2012. Slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng)
lncreased 8 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 4 lncreased 7 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 67 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology
1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 66 percenL ln 2013 and 39 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 29 percenL of
lncrease from 27 percenL ln 2013 and 22 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 10 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12
S9
66
67
22
27
29
14
11
10
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

60

Grades 9-12

ln 2014, Lhe overall percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL lncreased ln comparlson Lo 2012. 1he percenLage
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 9
percenLage polnLs, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3
(asslng) lncreased by 10 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 8 percenLage polnLs from 2012 Lo 2014.

of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1
of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 60 percenL ln 2013 and 33 percenL ln 2012.

70
77
78
38
47 47
S3
60
63
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

61
Grades 9-12

ln 2014, Lhe overall performance of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL lncreased ln comparlson Lo 2012, wlLh Afrlcan-
Amerlcan sLudenLs lncreaslng by 4 percenLage polnLs, Plspanlc sLudenLs lncreaslng by 8 percenLage polnLs, and
WhlLe sLudenLs lncreaslng by 9 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 39 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1
Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
30
37
39
9
12
13
17
22
2S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

62

Grades 9-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

1he percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level
1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL has lmproved (decreased) slnce 2012, wlLh Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs
lmprovlng by 8 percenLage polnLs, Plspanlc sLudenLs lmprovlng by 6 percenLage polnLs, and WhlLe sLudenLs
lmprovlng by 3 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 3 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a
decrease from 19 percenL ln 2013 and 26 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 12 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12

8 6
S
26
19
18
18
13
12
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
"#$%

63
Grades 9-12

Cverall, SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL ln 2014 Lhan
ln 2013 and 2012. Slnce 2012, Lhe percenLage of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 who performed aL or
above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 7 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of SLudenLs wlLh
ulsablllLles performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 3 percenLage polnLs.

2014, 10 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe
8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 9 percenL ln 2013 and 7 percenL ln 2012. ln 2014, 23 percenL of
SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls
ls a decrease from 27 percenL ln 2013 and 33 percenL ln 2012.
31
37
38
7 9 10
33
27
2S
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

64

Grades 9-12

ln comparlson Lo 2012, Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC
AssessmenL, wlLh performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreaslng 3 percenLage polnLs and
performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreaslng 1 percenLage polnL.

(asslng) on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 21 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 16 percenL ln
on Lhe 8lology 1 LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls equal Lo 3 percenL ln 2013 and an lncrease from 2 percenL ln 2012. ln
2014, 40 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe 8lology 1

16
21 21
2
3 3
46
39
40
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2012 2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

63
Grades 6-12
8|o|ogy LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL 66 68 2
ALACnUA 72 71 -1
8AkLk 63 39 -6
8A 63 71 6
8kADICkD 32 47 -3
8kLVAkD 70 76 6
8kCWAkD 63 66 1
CALnCUN 68 68 0
CnAkLC11L 68 67 -1
CI1kUS 72 67 -3
CLA 70 66 -4
CCLLILk 70 69 -1
CCLUM8IA 37 61 4
MIAMI DADL 62 63 3
DLSC1C 63 63 2
DIkIL 67 33 -12
DUVAL 67 63 -4
LSCAM8IA 70 71 1
ILAGLLk 79 68 -11
IkANkLIN 38 70 12
GADSDLN 40 43 3
GILCnkIS1 87 88 1
GLADLS 62 69 7
GULI 66 62 -4
nAMIL1CN 49 43 -6
nAkDLL 37 34 -3
nLNDk 33 33 2
nLkNANDC 66 70 4
nIGnLANDS 63 62 -1
nCLMLS 66 60 -6
IACkSCN 64 70 6
ILIILkSCN 32 30 18

1
"#$%

66

Grades 6-12
8|o|ogy LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL 66 68 2
LAIAL11L 69 73 6
LAkL 66 70 4
LLL 63 63 0
LLCN 71 69 -2
LLV 73 63 -10
LI8Lk1 39 76 17
MADISCN 43 38 -3
MANA1LL 69 68 -1
MAkICN 64 64 0
MAk1IN 77 76 -1
MCNkCL 73 77 2
NASSAU 73 76 3
CkALCCSA 73 73 2
CkLLCnC8LL 64 73 9
CkANGL 68 69 1
CSCLCLA 34 63 9
ALM 8LACn 67 70 3
ASCC 67 70 3
INLLLAS 68 68 0
CLk 32 36 4
U1NAM 63 69 6
S1 ICnNS 87 91 4
S1 LUCIL 61 62 1
SAN1A kCSA 79 76 -3
SAkASC1A 74 77 3
SLMINCLL 74 77 3
SUM1Lk 62 67 3
SUWANNLL 66 72 6
1ALCk 64 62 -2
UNICN 39 73 14
VCLUSIA 81 74 -7
WAkULLA 81 78 -3
WAL1CN 70 76 6
WASnING1CN 63 73 8

"#$%

67

U.S. n|story LCC Assessment
Grades 7-12
2014 Schoo| ear
NC1LS:
1) SLudenL performance on Lhe 2013 u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL presenLed ln Lhls medla packeL
ls reporLed uslng Lhe AchlevemenL Levels esLabllshed by Lhe SLaLe 8oard of LducaLlon ln !anuary
3) u.S. PlsLory sLudenL performance ln Lhls medla packeL lncludes sLudenL resulLs for all flrsL-Llme
2012-13 Sprlng, Summer
2013-14
lall, WlnLer, Sprlng (Summer
noL yeL admlnlsLered)

"#$%

68

Grades 7-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014 Lhan ln 2013. 1he
percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 who performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 10 percenLage polnLs from 2013 Lo 2014.

ln 2014, 66 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 36 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 38 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 7-
12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 28
percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 16 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 21 percenL ln 2013.
S6
66
28
38
21
16
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

69
Grades 7-12

Cverall, Afrlcan-Amerlcan, Plspanlc and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC
AssessmenL ln 2014 Lhan ln 2013. 1he percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12
performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 7 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of
Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased 12 percenLage
polnLs.

u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 70 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 46 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls an lncrease from 39 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 62 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL
or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 30 percenL ln
2013.
70
77
39
46
S0
62
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

70

Grades 7-12

above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL lncreased ln comparlson Lo 2013. 1he percenLage
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 6
lncreased by 12 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 11 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 30 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 39 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 20 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 14 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 34 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 22 percenL ln 2013.

39
S0
14
20
22
34
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

71

Grades 7-12
At Ach|evement Leve| 1

ln 2014, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL lmproved (decreased) ln comparlson Lo 2013. 1he
percenLage of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased)
by 6 percenLage polnLs, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1
lmproved (decreased) by 8 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performlng aL
AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) by 4 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 8 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 12 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 27 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln
grades 7-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 33
percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 18 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 7-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe
u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 26 percenL ln 2013.

12
8
33
27
26
18
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

72

Grades 7-12

Cverall, SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 7-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014
Lhan ln 2013, wlLh a 6 percenLage-polnL lncrease ln performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and a 4
percenLage-polnL lncrease ln performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4.

(asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 36 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 19 percenL of
SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 13 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 34 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades
7-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 38 percenL ln
2013.
36
42
1S
19
38
34
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

73
Grades 7-12

Cverall, Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 7-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014
Lhan ln 2013, wlLh a 3 percenLage-polnL lncrease ln performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and a 3
percenLage-polnL lncrease ln performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4.

(asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 17 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 6 percenL of
Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 7-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 3 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 32 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades
2013.
17
22
3
6
S9
S2
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

74

Grades 9-12

Cverall, sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014 Lhan ln 2013. 1he
percenLage of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 who performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) and aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased 10 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 66 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 36 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 38 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-
12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 28
percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 16 percenL of sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 21 percenL ln 2013.

S6
66
28
38
21
16
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

73
Grades 9-12

Cverall, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL lncreased ln comparlson Lo 2013. 1he percenLage of Afrlcan-
Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 7
percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL
Level 3 (asslng) lncreased by 12 percenLage polnLs.

u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 70 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 46 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL.
1hls ls an lncrease from 39 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 62 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL
or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 30 percenL ln
2013.
70
77
39
46
S0
62
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

76

Grades 9-12

above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL lncreased ln comparlson Lo 2013. 1he percenLage
of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 6
lncreased by 12 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreased by 11 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 30 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S.
PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 39 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 20 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan
sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an
lncrease from 14 percenL ln 2013. ln 2013, 34 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above
AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 22 percenL ln 2013.

39
S0
14
20
22
34
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

77
Grades 9-12
Ach|evement Leve| 1

ln comparlson Lo 2013, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc, Afrlcan-Amerlcan and WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 who
performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL lmproved (decreased). 1he percenLage of
Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 6 percenLage
polnLs, Lhe percenLage of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL Level 1 lmproved
(decreased) 8 percenLage polnLs, and Lhe percenLage of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performlng aL AchlevemenL
Level 1 lmproved (decreased) 4 percenLage polnLs.

ln 2014, 8 percenL of WhlLe sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 12 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 27 percenL of Afrlcan-Amerlcan sLudenLs ln
grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 33
percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 18 percenL of Plspanlc sLudenLs ln grades 9-12 performed aL AchlevemenL Level 1 on Lhe
u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls a decrease from 26 percenL ln 2013.
12
8
33
27
26
18
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
"#$%

78

Grades 9-12
Ach|evement Leve|

Cverall, SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014
Lhan ln 2013, wlLh Lhe performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreaslng by 6 percenLage polnLs
and performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreaslng by 4 percenLage polnLs.

(asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 36 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 19 percenL of
SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 13 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 34 percenL of SLudenLs wlLh ulsablllLles ln grades
2013.
36
42
1S
19
38
34
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

79
Grades 9-12

Cverall, Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed hlgher on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL ln 2014
Lhan ln 2013, wlLh performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 3 (asslng) lncreaslng by 3 percenLage polnLs and
performance aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 lncreaslng by 3 percenLage polnLs.

(asslng) on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 17 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 6 percenL of
Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades 9-12 performed aL or above AchlevemenL Level 4 on Lhe u.S. PlsLory LCC
AssessmenL. 1hls ls an lncrease from 3 percenL ln 2013. ln 2014, 32 percenL of Lngllsh Language Learners ln grades
2013.
17
22
3
6
S9
S2
0
10
20
30
40
S0
60
70
80
90
100
2013 2014
Ach|evement Leve| 1
"#$%

80

Grades 7-12
U.S. n|story LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL S6 66 10
ALACnUA 39 70 11
8AkLk 30 63 13
8A 63 37 -6
8kADICkD 34 63 9
8kLVAkD 66 70 4
8kCWAkD 33 63 8
CALnCUN 33 76 23
CnAkLC11L 62 66 4
CI1kUS 61 69 8
CLA 63 73 10
CCLLILk 60 72 12
CCLUM8IA 33 61 8
MIAMI DADL 44 37 13
DLSC1C 33 70 17
DIkIL 31 31 20
DUVAL 41 60 19
LSCAM8IA 63 68 3
ILAGLLk 66 73 7
IkANkLIN 44 34 10
GADSDLN 26 28 2
GILCnkIS1 63 73 10
GLADLS 39 63 4
GULI 62 72 10
nAMIL1CN 41 40 -1
nAkDLL 43 30 3
nLNDk 34 69 13
nLkNANDC 39 66 7
nIGnLANDS 32 60 8
nCLMLS 47 39 12
IACkSCN 61 68 7
ILIILkSCN 37 34 -3

1
1hls Lable lncludes sLudenL resulLs of flrsL-Llme LesL Lakers ln Lhe sprlng and summer admlnlsLraLlons for Lhe
prevlous year and fall, wlnLer and sprlng for Lhe currenL year admlnlsLraLlons.
"#$%

81
Grades 7-12
U.S. n|story LCC Assessment kesu|ts
1

D|str|ct

ercentage ass|ng
(Leve| 3 and Above)
ercentage o|nt
S1A1LWIDL S6 66 10
LAIAL11L 62 66 4
LAkL 38 63 7
LLL 33 63 8
LLCN 64 64 0
LLV 38 71 13
LI8Lk1 73 72 -1
MADISCN 31 43 12
MANA1LL 36 67 11
MAkICN 38 66 8
MAk1IN 64 72 8
MCNkCL 39 73 36
NASSAU 62 76 14
CkALCCSA 73 77 4
CkLLCnC8LL 39 31 12
CkANGL 60 67 7
CSCLCLA 30 33 3
ALM 8LACn 33 67 12
ASCC 64 72 8
INLLLAS 60 66 6
CLk 30 37 7
U1NAM 33 37 2
S1 ICnNS 80 83 3
S1 LUCIL 32 60 8
SAN1A kCSA 73 78 3
SAkASC1A 69 73 6
SLMINCLL 71 77 6
SUM1Lk 63 69 4
SUWANNLL 37 32 -3
1ALCk 33 31 -24
UNICN 64 76 12
VCLUSIA 60 63 3
WAkULLA 66 70 4
WAL1CN 62 73 13
WASnING1CN 38 38 0

Florida End-Of-Course Assessments Algebra 1, Geometry, Biology 1 AND U.S. History

Загружено:

Сведения о документе

Оригинальное название

Авторское право

Доступные форматы

Поделиться этим документом

Поделиться или встроить документ

Параметры публикации

Этот документ был вам полезен?

Это неприемлемый материал?

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Florida End-Of-Course Assessments Algebra 1, Geometry, Biology 1 AND U.S. History

Загружено:

Авторское право:

Доступные форматы

Iune 2014

Вам также может понравиться