1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
JANICE WOLK GRENADIER,
Plaintiff, Civil Action No 14 - 0162
v. No. 14-7020 September Term 2013
Motion for investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell
ILONA GRENADIER HECKMAN et al
Defendants
Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge A. Howell stealing
Documents out of Case File No.14-0162 with the assistance of the
Clerks Angela D. Caesar & Deputy clerk Michael Darby Obstructing
Justice & Tampering with evidence recorded into the record
Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and
her relationship with Keller Heckman Law firm Jerome (Jerry)
Heckman - Ilona Grenadier Heckman Loretta Lax Miller et al
Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and
Her husband (Michael Rosenfeld) religious beliefs
Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howells
relationship with the Center for Democracy and Technology that lists
Howell as a board alum(per Wikipedia a Technology group Keller
Heckman is very involved in)
Motion for description as to what is confusing to the Judges on
Plaintiffs Amended Complaint written with the help of an attorney
Motion for Law used in Order dated on May 19, 2014 & May 30, 2014
That the appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself That the
appearance of the Memorandum of Law and the Orders is Judges ruling in
Favoritism and Cronyism for the Virginia Judicial System and the United
States District Court Eastern District of Virginia to protect their colleges/friends,
lawyers, government employees, Judges, - To keep the Judicial System
Corruption from being exposed To discredit and slander Plaintiff as the United
States District Court Eastern District of Virginia has done as well as other
Judges and the documents allowed to be filed by Loretta Miller et al.
Motion to have all Orders by Judge Beryl A. Howell stricken from the
record due to the appearance of conflict and criminal actions of
2

tampering/stealing Documents stamped and filed into the Record on Case
Civil Action No 14 0162 in this Court

Table of Contents
(so as not to confuse the Judges so they cannot say Plaintiff is rambling on)

The Law

Statement to include all Documents filed in case to Date

Statement For Each Motion

Statement of the Facts

Parties

Conclusion

Attachments
Copy of Document Filed by Plaintiff on May 6, 2014 and Mailed back to on or
around May 19, 2014 PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO HOME GROWN TERRIOST:
LORETTA LAX MILLER aka LEA LAX aka MUGGY CAT aka BILLY
SULLIVAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FOR 2016 ANSWERS TO THE AMENDED
VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND NEW MATTER

The Law
1. Code of Conduct for United States Judges:
Federal judges abide by the Code of Conduct for United States Judges, a set of ethical principles and guidelines
adopted by the Judicial Conference of the United States. The Code of Conduct provides guidance for judges on
issues of judicial integrity and independence, judicial diligence and impartiality, permissible extra-judicial
activities, and the avoidance of impropriety or even its appearance.
Judges may not hear cases in which they have either personal knowledge of the disputed facts, a personal bias
concerning a party to the case, earlier involvement in the case as a lawyer, or a financial interest in any party or
subject matter of the case.
Many federal judges devote time to public service and educational activities. They have a distinguished history
of service to the legal profession through their writing, speaking, and teaching. This important role is recognized
in the Code of Conduct, which encourages judges to engage in activities to improve the law, the legal system,
and the administration of justice.
Canon 1: A Judge should uphold the Integrity and the Independence of the Judiciary
Canon 2: A Judge should avoid Impropriety and the Appearance of Impropriety in all activities
Canon 3: A Judge should perform the duties of the office Fairly, Impartially and Diligently
Canon 4: A Judge may engage in extra Judicial activities that are consistent with the obligations of judicial office
Canon 5: A Judge should refrain from Political Activity
3

2. "Pro se plaintiffs are often unfamiliar with the formalities of pleading requirements.
Recognizing this, the Supreme Court has instructed the district courts to construe pro
se complaints liberally and to apply a more flexible standard in determining the
sufficiency of a pro se complaint than they would in reviewing a pleading submitted by
counsel. See e.g., Hughes v. Rowe, 449 U.S. 5, 9-10, 101 S.Ct. 173, 175-76, 66
L.Ed.2d 163 (1980) (per curiam); Haines v. Kerner, 404 U.S. 519, 520-21, 92 S.Ct.
594, 595-96, 30 L.Ed.2d 652 (1972) (per curiam); see also Elliott v. Bronson, 872
F.2d 20, 21 (2d Cir.1989) (per curiam). In order to justify the dismissal of a pro se
complaint, it must be " 'beyond doubt that the plaintiff can prove no set of facts
in support of his claim which would entitle him to relief.' " Haines v. Kerner, 404
U.S. at 521, 92 S.Ct. at 594 (quoting Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41, 45-46, 78 S.Ct.
99, 102, 2 L.Ed.2d 80 (1957)).
3. American citizens are guaranteed equal protection of the laws by the Fourteenth
Amendment and an impartial jury by the Sixth Amendment. Justice is blind means
that justice is impartial and objective.
4. Fairness of course requires an absence of actual bias in the trial of cases. But our
system of law has always endeavored to prevent even the probability of unfairness. In
re Murchinson, 349 U.S. 133, 136 (1955) When reviewing a pro-se pleading, it is
prudent to follow the federal practice of liberally construing the allegations set out in
the pleading to determine whether the pleading asserts any valid causes of action.
See, e.g. Harrison v. U.S. Postal Services 840 F. 2d 1149, 1152 (4
th
Cir. 1988). The
factual allegations should be viewed in the light most favorable to the pleading party.
Davis v. City of Portsmouth, 579 F. Supp. 1205, 1209-10 (E.D. Va. 1983), affd, 742
F .2d 1448 (4
th
Cir. 1984)
5. Failing to protect the Civil Rights of Plaintiff by ignoring Due Process, showing
favoritism to the Defendants and Defendants attorneys because of who they are part
of the Old Boys Network of Virginia or other. Loving v. Virginia, 388 U.S. 1 (1967)


was a landmark civil rights decision of the United States Supreme Court against
discrimination. Which includes being discriminated because the Judges, lawyers,
elected officials and government employees have decided you are not a part of their
race.
6. No man in this country is so high that he is above the law. No officer of the law may
4

set that law at defiance with impunity. All the officers of the government from the
highest to the lowest, are creatures of the law, and are bound to obey it. Butz v.
Economou, 98 S.Ct. 2894 (1978); United States v. Lee, 106 U.S. at 220, 1 S.Ct. at
261 (1882)
7. Further it is the obligation of every Judge to honor, abide by, and uphold not only the
Constitution and laws of the State, but they are bound by the laws and Constitution of
the United States as well.
8. State courts, like federal courts, have a constitutional obligation to safeguard personal
liberties and to uphold federal law. Stone v Powell, 428 US 465, 483 n 35, 96 S. Ct
3037, 49 L Ed. 2d 1067 (1976)
9. Any judge who does not comply with his oath to the Constitution of the United States,
wars against that Constitution and engages in violation of the Supreme Law of the
Land. If a judge does not fully comply with the Constitution, then his orders are void, In
re Sawyer, 124 U.S. 200 (1888), he is without jurisdiction, and he/she has engaged in
an act or acts of treason.
10. You cant change the Truth - The Truth is the actions of the Judges, Under Illinois
and Federal law, when any officer of the court has committed fraud upon the court,
the orders and judgment of that court are void, of no legal force or effect.
Citation: 93F. 2d 313 (2d Cir. 1937) Any judgment procured by fraud is null and
void. An erroneous judgment may be attacked collaterally. Affirmed
11. The Constitution of the United States A fundamental, guarantee that all legal
proceedings will be fair and that one will be given notice of the proceedings and an
opportunity to be heard before the government acts to take away one's life, liberty, or
property. Also, a constitutional guarantee that a law shall not be unreasonable,
Arbitrary, or capricious. The constitutional guarantee of due process of law, found in
the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the U.S. Constitution, prohibits all levels of
government from arbitrarily or unfairly depriving individuals of their basic constitutional
rights to life, liberty, and property. The Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment
ratified in 1791, asserts that no person shall "be deprived of life, liberty, or property,
without due process of law." This amendment restricts the powers of the federal
government and applies only to actions by it. The Due Process Clause of the
Fourteenth Amendment, ratified in 1868, declares,"[N]or shall any State deprive any
5

person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law" ( 1). This clause limits
the powers of the states, rather than those of the federal government.
12. U.S. Code Title 28 Part I Chapter 21 455
28 U.S. Code 455 - Disqualification of justice, judge, or magistrate judge
(a) Any justice, judge, or magistrate judge of the United States shall disqualify himself in
any proceeding in which his impartiality might reasonably be questioned.
(b) He shall also disqualify himself in the following circumstances: (1) Where he has a
personal bias or prejudice concerning a party, or personal knowledge of disputed
evidentiary facts concerning the proceeding; (2) Where in private practice he served as
lawyer in the matter in controversy, or a lawyer with whom he previously practiced law
served during such association as a lawyer concerning the matter, or the judge or such
lawyer has been a material witness concerning it; (3) Where he has served in
governmental employment and in such capacity participated as counsel, adviser or
material witness concerning the proceeding or expressed an opinion concerning the
merits of the particular case in controversy; (4) He knows that he, individually or as a
fiduciary, or his spouse or minor child residing in his household, has a financial
interest in the subject matter in controversy or in a party to the proceeding, or any
other interest that could be substantially affected by the outcome of the proceeding;
(5) He or his spouse, or a person within the third degree of relationship to either of
them, or the spouse of such a person:
(i) Is a party to the proceeding, or an officer, director, or trustee of a party; (ii) Is acting as a lawyer in
the proceeding; (iii) Is known by the judge to have an interest that could be substantially affected by
the outcome of the proceeding; (iv) Is to the judges knowledge likely to be a material witness in the
proceeding.

(c) A judge should inform himself about his personal and fiduciary financial interests, and make a
reasonable effort to inform himself about the personal financial interests of his spouse and minor
children residing in his household.

(d) For the purposes of this section the following words or phrases shall have the meaning indicated:
(1) proceeding includes pretrial, trial, appellate review, or other stages of litigation; (2) the degree of
relationship is calculated according to the civil law system; (3) fiduciary includes such relationships
as executor, administrator, trustee, and guardian; (4) financial interest means ownership of a legal
or equitable interest, however small, or a relationship as director, adviser, or other active participant
in the affairs of a party, except that:
(i) Ownership in a mutual or common investment fund that holds securities is not a financial interest
in such securities unless the judge participates in the management of the fund; (ii) An office in an
educational, religious, charitable, fraternal, or civic organization is not a financial interest in
securities held by the organization; (iii) The proprietary interest of a policyholder in a mutual
insurance company, of a depositor in a mutual savings association, or a similar proprietary interest, is
a financial interest in the organization only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially
6

affect the value of the interest; (iv) Ownership of government securities is a financial interest in the
issuer only if the outcome of the proceeding could substantially affect the value of the securities.

(e) No justice, judge, or magistrate judge shall accept from the parties to the proceeding a waiver of
any ground for disqualification enumerated in subsection (b). Where the ground for disqualification
arises only under subsection (a), waiver may be accepted provided it is preceded by a full disclosure
on the record of the basis for disqualification.
(f) Notwithstanding the preceding provisions of this section, if any justice, judge, magistrate judge, or
bankruptcy judge to whom a matter has been assigned would be disqualified, after substantial
judicial time has been devoted to the matter, because of the appearance or discovery, after the matter
was assigned to him or her, that he or she individually or as a fiduciary, or his or her spouse or minor
child residing in his or her household, has a financial interest in a party (other than an interest that
could be substantially affected by the outcome), disqualification is not required if the justice, judge,
magistrate judge, bankruptcy judge, spouse or minor child, as the case may be, divests himself or
herself of the interest that provides the grounds for the disqualification.

13. Other law is included in this document where applicable.

Statement to include all Documents filed in case to Date

That Plaintiff includes in this all documents filed from on or around January 22, 2014 in this
Case and the Appeal Brief with Appendix filed on June 6, 2014. That Judges ruled without
Defendants filing any documents until on or around April 17, 2014 when Loretta Lax Miller
filed documents that are and were riddled with lies and slanderous to Plaintiff. These
documents have been allowed into the record. Plaintiffs documents in response filed on May
6, 2014 stamped into the record were mailed back to Plaintiff. Federal Law prohibits
Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with evidence, Harassment, Intimidation of a witness or
Pro Se litigant. That by all appearance Judges in the United States District Court of the
District of Columbia ruled on ex parte communications with Defendants or Defendants
agents.
Statement for Each Motion

1. Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge A. Howell stealing Documents
out of Case File No. 14 -0162 , Tampering with evidence recorded/stamped
into the record. By appearance with the assistance of the Clerks Angela D.
Caesar and Michael Darby, Deputy Clerk
A. Obstruction of Justice US Code 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 - OBSTRUCTION OF
JUSTICE That when Judge A. Howell stole the documents she Obstructed
7

the Truth and evidence to prove that Loretta Lax Miller had lied in documents
submitted to this court.
B. 18 U.S. Code 1506 - Theft or alteration of record or process; false bail
Whoever feloniously steals, takes away, alters, falsifies, or otherwise avoids any
record, writ, process, or other proceeding, in any court of the United States,
whereby any judgment is reversed, made void, or does not take effect; or
Whoever acknowledges, or procures to be acknowledged in any such court, any recognizance,
bail, or judgment, in the name of any other person not privy or consenting to the same
Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than five years, or both
C. (U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1512
18 .S. Code 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person,
or attempts to do so, with intent to
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official
proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record,
document, or other object, from an official proceeding; (ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an
object with intent to impair the integrity or availability of the object for use in an official
proceeding; (iii) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to
produce a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or (iv) be absent from an
official proceeding to which that person has been summoned by legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or
judge of the United States of information relating to the commission or possible
commission of a Federal offense or a violation of conditions of probation,
supervised release, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings; shall be
punished as provided in paragraph (3). (3) The punishment for an offense under
this subsection is

D. U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1513
18 U.S. Code 1513 - Retaliating against a witness, victim, or an informant - That Judge
Beryl A. Howell retaliated by her Order of May 30, 2014 denying Amended Complaint
E. U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1514
18 U.S. Code 1514 - Civil action to restrain harassment of a victim
or witness - That Judge Beryl A. Howell has empowered Defendant to further
harass and Slander Plaintiff as is being done in the new Blog by Loretta Miller
as seen further down under Parties by Loretta Millers Blog LorettaMiller
F. U.S. Code Title 18 Part I Chapter 73 1512
18 U.S. Code 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
(a)
(1) Whoever kills or attempts to kill another person, with intent to
8

(A) prevent the attendance or testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) prevent the production of a record, document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or
(C) prevent the communication by any person to a law enforcement officer or judge of the United
States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense or
a violation of conditions of probation, parole, or release pending judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(2) Whoever uses physical force or the threat of physical force against any person, or attempts to
do so, with intent to
(A) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(B) cause or induce any person to
(i) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding; (ii) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the integrity or
availability of the object for use in an official proceeding; (iii) evade legal process summoning
that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record, document, or other object, in an
official proceeding; or (iv) be absent from an official proceeding to which that person has been
summoned by legal process; or
(C) hinder, delay, or prevent the communication to a law enforcement officer or judge of the
United States of information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal
offense or a violation of conditions of probation, supervised release, parole, or release pending
judicial proceedings;
shall be punished as provided in paragraph (3).
(3) The punishment for an offense under this subsection is
(A) in the case of a killing, the punishment provided in sections 1111 and 1112;
(B) in the case of
(i) an attempt to murder; or (ii) the use or attempted use of physical force against any person;
imprisonment for not more than 30 years; and
(C) in the case of the threat of use of physical force against any person, imprisonment for not
more than 20 years.
(b) Whoever knowingly uses intimidation, threatens, or corruptly persuades another person, or
attempts to do so, or engages in misleading conduct toward another person, with intent to
(1) influence, delay, or prevent the testimony of any person in an official proceeding;
(2) cause or induce any person to
(A) withhold testimony, or withhold a record, document, or other object, from an official
proceeding;
(B) alter, destroy, mutilate, or conceal an object with intent to impair the objects integrity or
availability for use in an official proceeding;
(C) evade legal process summoning that person to appear as a witness, or to produce a record,
document, or other object, in an official proceeding; or ET AL -

9

2. Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and her
relationship with Keller Heckman Law firm Jerome (Jerry) Heckman - Ilona
Grenadier Heckman Loretta Lax Miller et al
A. The orders on or around May 19, & May 30, 2014 are not rational nor would
such an Order be allowed if Plaintiff was an attorney or had an attorney.
Further, this policy puts Plaintiff before the court on an unequal footing with
Plaintiffs opponent, a due process violation. ,J ohnson v. Zerbst, 304 U.S.
458, 58 S.Ct. 1019(193 ;Pure Oil Co. v. City of Northlake, 10 Ill.2d 241, 245,
140 N.E. 2d 289 (1956);Hallberg v Goldblatt Bros., 363 Ill 25 (1936), the
court exceeded it's statutory authority. Rosenstiel v. Rosenstiel, 278 F. Supp.
794 (S.D.N.Y. 1967) Plaintiffs opponent Ilona Ely Grenadier Heckman has the
benefits of being an attorney, the widow of a past Judge, the widow of Jerome
(Jerry) Heckman founding partner of Keller Heckman an international law firm
whose main office is in DC that specializes in many fields that Judge Beryl A.
Howell has worked in. That Loretta Lax Miller et al claims to be running for
President of the United States of America and has donations coming in from the
likes of Larry Page of Google, Microsoft, several different performers, Radio
stations, Facebook etc etc and very close ties to Israel and its leaders. With
Israel paying for monthly flights back and forth for her and her son due to an
illness he has.

3. Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howell and Her
husband (Michael Rosenfeld) religious beliefs
A. That this case is about Religious and Judicial discrimination with the attend to
harm Plaintiff emotionally, financially and by all appearance with the threats to
come to her home with many others physically, that with Judge Beryl A.
Howells rulings being so outrages, discriminating and criminal taking files
stamped into the record and Denying them to be filed and mailing them back to
Plaintiff that by the appearance of the last name of her husband she could be or
her husband could be Jewish in collusion with Defendants That 28 U.S. Code
455 9 (a) (b) can be found above in The Law.

10

B. Defendants and Judges have used unfair/unconscionable means to try and
intimate and scare Plaintiff They have acted as the Klue Klux Klan would have
in the past. Plaintiff is aware that Plaintiff must show that Plaintiff can prove
each element of alleged facts in her claims. That to seek relief for the violation
of a persons Federal and Constitution rights under Title 42 1983 it allows
Plaintiff to her rights contained in the United States Constitution as defined by
Federal Law.
Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being Catholic That Civil Rights Act
of 1968 enacted 18 USC 245 prevents discrimination due to Religion that this
is a Hate Crime and Hate crime laws are colorblind Fact the case which the
Supreme Court upheld hate crimes of the First amendment attach, Wisconsin v.
Mitchell, 508 U.S. 476(1993) involved a white victim.
Plaintiff has been discriminated against for being black balled by the Old Boys
Network / Judicial Community due to her x-husband being the son of the late
Judge Albert Grenadier whom was the Husband to Defendant Ilona a lawyer who
has also intervened into Defendants Divorce. That the discrimination and
segregation among white exist the power Hierarchy by a member
of one that is considered by others inferior to the other.

C. That this e-mail is only one of many that shows the Religious
Discrimination, Harassment and Hate that this court has supported:
From: LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24,
2013 at 2:05 PM
To: jwgrenadier@gmail.com
want to hear something more scarier I
contacted Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman your witch hunt is over

From:LeahLax1234@aol.com <LeahLax1234@aol.com>
Tue, Dec 24,
2013 at 10:39
AM
To: jwgrendier@gmail.com
you know what YOU DIDN"T HELP JEWS YOU ARE THE KIND THAT WOULD TURN
11

THEM IN BECAUSE ONE PERSON DID SOMETHING TO YOU THAT WAS JEWISH. YOU MADE
YOUR BED AND YOU LIED IN IT ! THIS FAMILY REJECTED YOU FOR NOT BEING JEWISH. YOU
STUPID GOY. YOU WERE REJECTED .. GET THAT INTO YOUR THICK
SKULL. NOW YOU ARE MAKING UP STORIES AND SPREADING LIES! BLAMING
ALL JEWS LIKE HITLER FOR NOT LIVING ON
EASY STREET. WELL GET OFF YOUR ASS. GOOD YOU LOST ALL YOUR MONEY
MAKES YOU HUMBLE. AND GOOD YOU GOT A WHIPPING FROM A JEWISH LAWYER WHO WAS
SMARTER THEN YOURS. GOOD FOR HER. I WOULD HIRE HER IN A HEART BEAT. SHE WENT
AFTER A JEW HATING NAZI AND SHE WON. AND I HOPE SHE GAVE HER GRANDSON A GOOD
TALKING TO FOR MARRYING A GOY IN THE FIRST PLACE AND HE SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIS
ZIPPER UP AND NOT HAVE HAD SEX WITH A MENTALLY SICK PIECE OF CRAP LIKE YOU.
YOU ARE THE NAZI WORSE A MUSLIN LOVING
NAZI! YOU HATE YOURSELF THAT IS WHY YOU HATE JEWS YOU ARE BLOCKED! -
The Words of Presidential candidate Leah Lax et al
That this is only one of several e-mails sent to Janice Wolk Grenadier since May of
2008 from when Defendant Ilona Grenadier turned in court to Janice Wolk Grenadier and
said Me and my family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them
Catholic These girls by blood were the Grandchildren of Judge Albert Grenadier and
the cousins of her 3
rd
Husband Jerome Heckman (Jerome may have seen the girls once
or twice with Ilona only seeing them a few times more in 23 years) the emails were in
collusion of Ilona, her lawyers and others under the direction of Ilona by all appearance.
More e-mails can be seen in found in the Appendix with the appeals court and other filings
in this court. That the unequal treatment by this court by appearance is because of the
Plaintiffs Christian / Catholic beliefs. That Christian / Catholics to hate or to torture Jews
would be in direct conflict of their basic beliefs as Jesus is Jewish. It is the Jews that have
chosen not to accept him. It is the Jewish Defendants and Judges that have persecuted
Plaintiff for her religious believes to take the eyes off the real criminal and criminal
actions of wealthy, powerful Old Boy Network attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier
Heckman
D. Prejudice has been shown by all Judges and there is prejudgment, or
the forming of an opinion before becoming aware of the relevant facts of a
case. By slandering Plaintiff and Plaintiffs filings without giving Plaintiff her
12

day in Court.


4. Motion for immediate Investigation into Judge Beryl A. Howells relationship
with the Center for Democracy and Technology that lists Howell as a board
alum(per Wikipedia a Technology group Keller Heckman is very involved in)
A. Plaintiff googled searched Center for Democracy and Technology Keller
Heckman results were 3,740 results (0.43 seconds)
Feb 3, 2011 - ... President and Chief Executive Officer, Center for Democracy
and Technology, ... Richard Leighton, Keller & Heckman, Washington, DC.
Keller Heckman a firm used by the government in several areas by all
appearance from information found on line shows a collusion with Judge Beryl
A. Howell which would link her to Jerome Heckman founding partner and late
husband of Defendant Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman a lawyer.

5. Motion for description as to what is confusing to the Judges on Plaintiffs
Amended Complaint reviewed by an attorney.
A. That by all appearance the Judges are ruling to protect the corruption in the
Judicial System being reviled. To protect very powerful Ilona Grenadier
Heckman a lawyer who if held accountable should and will lose her Law
License and possible go to jail as Jim Arthur did for 5 years for his stealing from
the Sonia Grenadier trust and others.

6. Motion for Law used in Order dated on May 19, 2014 & May 30, 2014 That the
appearance of Justice is as important as Justice itself
That the appearance of the Memorandum of Law and the Orders is Judges
ruling in Favoritism and Cronyism for the Virginia Judicial System and the
United States District Court Eastern District of Virginia to protect their
colleges/friends, lawyers, government employees, Judges,
To keep the Judicial System Corruption from being exposed
To discredit and slander Plaintiff as the United States District Court Eastern District
of Virginia has done as well as other Judges and the documents allowed to be filed
by Loretta Miller et al.
A. That the Memorandum of Law and Orders show the Corruption, the Collusion,
the Criminal actions of the Judges to try and silence the TRUTH. That
discrimination of Religion, Class, Social Status, Financial is clear. That to use
damaging words that have no substance to the case to take the eyes off the
facts. That the Judges slandering Plaintiff is criminal.

7. Motion to have all Orders by Judge Beryl A. Howell stricken from the record
and her removed due to the appearance of conflict and criminal actions of
13

tampering with Documents stamped and filed into the Record on Case14-0162 in
this Court
A. That a Special Grand Jury should be put into place to investigate the Criminal
Actions of the Courts, Judges and Clerks.

Statement of Facts

1. That on or around April 17, 2014 Loretta Lax Miller et al filed in this court
Answers to the Amended Verified Complaint and New Matter This document
was the first and to date the only document filed with this court. No other document
has been filed denying any allegations by the Plaintiff.
2. That the document filed on or around April 17, 2014 was and is riddled with
slanderous lies.
3. That this document was allowed to be filed into the Record and the slanderous
lies to remain in the record to protect the Judges rulings.
4. That on May 6, 2014 Plaintiff filed: PLAINTIFFS RESPONSE TO HOME GROWN
TERRIOST: LORETTA LAX MILLER aka LEA LAX aka MUGGY CAT aka
BILLY SULLIVAN PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE FOR 2016 ANSWERS TO THE
AMENDED VERIFIED COMPLAINT AND NEW MATTER It was stamped into the
record with no questions of it being inappropriate.
5. That on or around May 19, 2014 Judge Beryl A. Howell personally 2 weeks after
the filing decides she doesnt want to allow the TRUTH into the record. Judge
Beryl A. Howell without cause which shows personal conflict mailed back
Plaintiffs documents on or around May 25
th
per postage stamped.
6. That on or around May 30, 2014 to further assist her friends the Defendants
Loretta Lax Miller, Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman and others Judge
Beryl A. Howell does an Empowering Order for Defendants further disclosing
the appearance of Obstruction of Justice, Tampering with evidence to cover up
the criminal actions of the Defendants.
7. That by all appearance ex parte communications Loretta Miller was informed of
this prior to the Order even being mailed out to Plaintiff Janice Wolk Grenadier
on June 11, 2014 as Loretta Miller was able to go on Line start a new Blog:
LorettaMillerSuesJaniceWolkGrenadier.blogspot.com Under Parties you will
see her blog entries and her twitter entries of such new blog.
14

8. That in May of 2014 in Camp Hill, PA a new police report is filed against Loretta
Miller for a Hate Crime against a young girl. That may have been prevented if the
Judges in this court had acted with integrity and using the Laws and Rules of
the Supreme Court, the United States Constitution of America and the Bill of
Rights been prevented.

Parties

1. Judge Beryl A. Howell by all appearance guilty of: Obstruction of Justice,
Tampering with evidence, theft of evidence stamped in documents for CASE NO. 14-
0162, Religious, Social, Economic Discrimination and other things. Included all
information in the Motions Statements.
2. Ilona Grenadier Heckman a lawyer is guilty of the following criminal actions: of
being involved in , Perjury, Obstruction of Justice, Aiding and abetting obstruction of
Justice, Fraud on the Court, Involvement of Forgery, Theft of money from the Sonia
Grenadier Trust account through her law office for great personal gain over $10 Million
in Real Estate, Theft of Herman Grenadier, malpractice, Bribery, Abuse of her Oath of
Office, Conspiracy, Collusion, Miscarriage of Justice, preventing Due Process, conflict
of interest related to the practice of law, violating code of ethics, has liability to her
victims, has violated Plaintiffs Religious, Political, United state Constitutional, Virginia
Constitutional and Civil Rights, Breach of Fiduciary Duties, RULES OF
PROFESSIONAL CONDUCT, Title 18 US code 241 Conspiracy against rights, and
242 Deprivation of rights under color of law, Retaliatory & Retribution actions,
Treason, Title VI Civil Rights Act of 1964 Title VI, 42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq., was
enacted as part of the landmark Civil Rights Act of 1964, 18 USC 912. With her
Intention to 18 USC 1341 -Frauds and swindles, Defraud, Breach of Contract,
Arbitrary and Capricious behavior, Committed Fraud on the Court, 18.2-498.3.
Misrepresentations prohibited, 18.2-172 - Forging, uttering, etc., other writings et
al. All of above charges will be proven with letters, documents, witnesses who
have also been harmed by the actions of Plaintiff.

That Defendant Ilonas attorneys, have lied in court, lied in court documents in Circuit Court
and to the Supreme Court of Virginia, used bribery, Obstruction of Justice, ex-parte
communications with Judges and other criminal activities.
15


That under the Preamble, A Lawyers Responsibilities reads in part:

A lawyers conduct should conform to the requirements or the law, both in professional service to clients
and in the lawyers business and personal affairs. A lawyer should use the laws procedures only for
legitimate purposes and not to harass or intimidate others. A lawyer should demonstrate respect for the
legal system and for those who serve it, including judges, other lawyers and public officials. While it is a
lawyers duty to uphold legal process.

In the mature of law practice, however, conflicting responsibilities are encountered. Virtually all difficult
ethical problems arise from conflict between a lawyers responsibilities to clients, to the legal system and to
the lawyers own interest in remaining an upright person while earning a satisfactory living.

the legal professions relative autonomy carries with it special responsibilities of self-government. The
profession has a responsibility to assure that its regulations are conceived in the public interest and not in
furtherance of parochial or self-interested concerns of the bar. Every lawyer is responsible for observance
of the Rules of Professional Conduct. A lawyer should also aid in securing their observance by other
lawyers. Neglect of these responsibilities compromises the Independence of the profession and the public
interest which it serves,

Maintaining the Integrity of the Profession Rule 8.3 Reporting Misconduct

Is very clear if a lawyer knows of another lawyers illegal actions they are required to report such actions to
the appropriate authorities.

Rule 8.4 Misconduct:

It is professional misconduct for a lawyer to:
(a) Violate or attempt to violate the Rules of Professional Conduct, knowingly assist or induce another to do so,
or do so through the acts of another;
(b) Commit a criminal or deliberately wrongful act that reflects adversely on the lawyers honesty,
trustworthiness or fitness to practice law;
(c) Engage in conduct involving dishonesty, fraud, deceit or misrepresentation which reflects adversely on the
lawyers fitness to practice law;
(d) State or imply an ability to influence improperly or upon irrelevant grounds any tribunal, legislative body, or
public official; or
(e) Knowingly assist a judge or judicial officer in conduct that is a violation of applicable rules of judicial
conduct or other law.

3. Loretta Lax Miller et al:
1. That on or around May 2013 Loretta Miller et al requested a connection on
Linkedin of Plaintiff.
2. That on or around Dec 2013 she e-mailed Plaintiff as Billy Sullivan Looking to
harm herself.
3. On Sunday December 29
th
concerned for the safety of Loretta Lax Miller
Plaintiff reached out to the FBI to protect Loretta Lax Miller.
16

4. Loretta Lax Miller also started at this point using the name Muggy Cat which
she used to start a blog jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com which is riddled with
lies and slanderous statements. This blog was in collusion with Ilona Ely
Freedman Grenadier Heckman as well as all e-mails and threats.
5. E-mails and all can be read in documents filed in this Court the Verified
Complaints etc.
6. On or around April 17, 2014 Loretta Miller responds to court filings.
7. By all appearance of timing she is involved with x-parte communications with
the Judges or through Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman a very wealthy
powerful Jewish attorney.
8. The Twitter and new Blog that Loretta Miller has been so empowered to do
thanks to the Obstruction of Justice and Tampering of Evidence by Judge Beryl
A. Howell.

LORETTA MILLER @Leah2526
Jun 10 2014
Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues Janice Wolk
Grenadier: Fact ONE
htt p: //lor ett amill
ersuesjanicewolkgenadier.blogspot.com/2014/06/fact-o
ne. ht ml?spr ef=t w

LORETTA MILLER @Leah2526
Jun 10 2014

Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues Janice Wolk
Grenadier: Reason for the Blog
htt p:/ /lor ett amill
ersuesjanicewolkgenadier.blogspot.com/2014/06/reason
-for-
blog. ht ml?spr ef=t w

LORETTA MILLER @Leah2526
Jun 10 2014

Reason for the Blog
htt p:/ /lorett amill
ersuesjanicewolkgenadier.blogspot.com/2014/06/reason
-for-blog.ht ml

Loretta
Lax Miller new Blog:

T u e s d a y , J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 4
Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues
Janice Wolk Grenadier: Fact ONE

Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues Janice Wolk Grenadier: Fact
ONE: Fact One Janice contacted me from a mass mailing of a blog sent out to over 3000 people on
linkedin. Maybe a handful of people asked me to...
Posted by Leah Lax at 9:46 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues
Janice Wolk Grenadier: Reason for the Blog

Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues Janice Wolk Grenadier:
Reason for the Blog: The reason for the blog is that Janice Wolk Grenadier has been spreading a
lies and hate against Loretta Miller. She has posted filing that ...
17

Posted by Leah Lax at 9:41 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Fact ONE The Magic Mushroom.......
Fact One
Janice contacted me from a mass mailing of a blog sent out to over 3000 people on linkedin.
Maybe a handful of people asked me to not send them links or mailings I accepted that. (Mass
Mailing sent by Leah Lax et al asking for people to connect with her )

On my blog I had a Nazi like comment about how Jews hate Catholics. Janice wanted to envolve
me in a family dispute. The dispute is about money. She wants money. Demanding Money. She is
trying to blackmail her family and myself into give her money...

This is what I found in my Gmail

JWG <valaw2010@gmail.com> 12/20
/13


JWG has left a new comment on your post "Boycott of Israel prompts two universities to quit...":

"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish
attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet &
Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in
the Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System,
and Cheating the IRS. - My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to
have the same respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts
and the United States of America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely
Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz are using their money and power to buy their war around the
Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com


Posted by JWG to 2016 AMERICA FIRST LORETTA MILLER CAMPAIGN at December 20, 2013
at 4:01 PM

My Pillow Pack <noreply-comment@blogger.com>
12/20
/13





to me Leah Lax Miller
My Pillow Pack has left a new comment on your post "Boycott of Israel prompts two universities to quit...":

"Me and My family had nothing to do with your girls because you raised them Catholic" by - Jewish
attorney Ilona Ely Freedman Grenadier Heckman - of Grenadier, Anderson, Starace, Duffet & Kiesler
Israel wants the United States of America to defend them - yet some of the most powerful Jews in the
Washington DC area - are discriminating against Catholics, Corrupting the Judicial System, and Cheating
the IRS. -My personal opinion is we need to be friends with Israel - But, they have to have the same
respect for other religions - and for the Laws and the Rules of the Supreme Courts and the United States of
America's Constitution - Very powerful Jews in the DC area Ilona Ely Freedman Heckman and Yoav Katz
are using their money and power to buy their war around the Judicial System and cheat the IRS! you can
read more at www.valaw2010.blogspot.com

Posted by My Pillow Pack to 2016 AMERICA FIRST LORETTA MILLER CAMPAIGN at
December 20, 2013 at 3:57 PM

What would you think? Exactly what I thought, a nut job contacting me. So I deleted it. But Notice
she mentions Jewish in each of her letters. This women is obsessed with hate for Jews.

The combination of Jewish Attorney, most powerful Jews, very powerful Jews came right out of
18

the Nazi and Islamic training books. This was what I received in December 20, 2013 and I block
this person's email on my blog email.

Janice these magic mushrooms do not belong in your salad............
Psilocybin mushrooms, also known as psychedelic mushrooms, are mushrooms that
contain the psychedelic drugs psilocybin and psilocin. Common colloquial terms include magic
mushrooms and 'shrooms.
[1]
Biological genera containing psilocybin mushrooms
include Copelandia, Galerina, Gymnopilus, Inocybe, Mycena, Panaeolus,Pholiotina, Pluteus,
and Psilocybe. About 40 species are found in the genus Psilocybe. Psilocybe cubensis is the
most common psilocybin mushroom in subtropical areas and the black market.
Psilocybin mushrooms have likely been used since prehistoric times and may have been
depicted in rock art. Many cultures have used these mushrooms in religious rites. In
modern Western society, they are used recreationally for their psychedelic effects.

Posted by Leah Lax at 9:38 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: janice wolk Grenadier, LeahLax2016, VALaw2010
Reason for the Blog
The reason for the blog is that Janice Wolk Grenadier has been spreading lies and hate against
Loretta Miller. She has posted filing that were thrown out of court as facts. Even
the courts realize Janice is not telling the truth.
Loretta Miller does not know Janice never met her but Janice thinks she knows Loretta from all
hearsay.
So we shall post all of Janice's dirty little secrets that will be exposed in court documents.
Folks I am exercising my freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Since Janice has a blog she
is considered a public figure and is now open to all attacks.
Next few days I'll be writing a Federal not a local or state charges in a law suit in
US Federal court on hate crime. As soon as I get it filed and numbered it will
be placed right here on the net for all to see AND I will post it as a PDF on
other web sites. So hold onto your seats as I undress and expose this Janice in
court filings.
Posted by Leah Lax at 9:15 PM No comments:
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: janice wolk Grenadier, LeahLax2016, VALaw2010
Newer PostsHome
Subscribe to: Posts (Atom
Leah Lax aka Loretta Lax Miller -Loretta Miller for President2016 Sues Janice Wolk
Grenadier
T u e s d a y , J u n e 1 0 , 2 0 1 4 Reason for the Blog
The reason for the blog is that Janice Wolk Grenadier has been spreading lies and hate against Loretta Miller.
She has posted filing that were thrown out of court as facts. Even the courts realize Janice is not telling the
truth.

Loretta Miller does not know Janice never met her but Janice thinks she knows Loretta from all hearsay.

So we shall post all of Janice's dirty little secrets that will be exposed in court documents.

Folks I am exercising my freedom of speech and freedom of the press. Since Janice has a blog she is
considered a public figure and is now open to all attacks.

Next few days I'll be writing a Federal not a local or state charges in a law suit in US Federal court on hate
crime. As soon as I get it filed and numbered it will be placed right here on the net for all to see AND I will
post it as a PDF on other web sites. So hold onto your seats as I undress and expose this Janice in court filings.
19

Posted by Leah Lax at 9:15 PM
Email ThisBlogThis!Share to TwitterShare to FacebookShare to Pinterest
Labels: janice wolk Grenadier, LeahLax2016, VALaw2010

Conclusion

The fundamental right to Due Process the basic Freedom that our country stands for
The right to due process without Fraud from Judges, Lawyers, Elected Officials it is a primary
component of Freedom. The right to a Fair Trial a basic Constitutional right that has
been the source of the light of freedom that our country has given the World. Calling
the Appellant Frivolous, rambling documents etc is no different than burning or
spitting on the United States of Americas Flag.
Fact that this court has refused Plaintiff her constitutional rights to have a case heard and to
be heard in front of a Judge with the Emergency Restraining Order shows bias.
Disciplinary Responsibilities of this and all courts:

1. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that another judge
has committed a violation of these Canons should take appropriate action. A judge having
knowledge that another judge has committed a violation of the Judicial Canons that raises a
substantial question as to the other judge's fitness for office should inform the appropriate
authorities.

2. A judge who receives reliable information indicating a substantial likelihood that a lawyer has
committed a violation of the Code of Professional Responsibility should take appropriate
action. A judge having knowledge that a lawyer has committed a violation of the Code of
Professional Responsibility that raises a substantial question as to the lawyer's or Judges
honesty, trustworthiness or fitness as a lawyer or Judge in other respects should inform the
Bar the attorney is associated with and appropriate authorities.

That the legal profession is largely self-governing. Although other professions also have been
granted powers of self-government, the legal profession is unique in this respect because of
the close relationship between the profession and the processes of government and
law enforcement. This connection is manifested in the fact that ultimate authority over
the legal profession is vested largely in the courts.

That the Treason on the Courts by the Judge have been, were, and are willful acts that were
and are malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent, wanton, and grossly reckless against
Plaintiff.

20

That Plaintiff was denied her constitutional right of Due Process in this court for being
Catholic and no longer party to the Old Boy Network. That under Title 42 1983 will show
violation of rights protected by the Constitution and created by Federal Statute that persons
employed by the government acting under color of federal law violated Plaintiffs
Constitutional rights. That the Judges and Clerks should be held responsible for their criminal
actions. That an investigation into all Judges and their relationship with the Defendants and
others to protect the TRUTH from coming out.

Defendants Civil Conspiracy to Commit Tortious Interference with Contractual Relations
abuse of process, intentional infliction of emotional distress,
Civil conspiracy to commit injurious falsehood with jwgrenadierisalair.blogspot.com that
Plaintiff has a protected characteristic which will be proven as to why Plaintiff was sought
out by Defendant and that factor is why Plaintiff was targeted by Defendants
Defendants were in collusion of civil conspiracy to intentionally inflict emotional distress.
That this court should move swiftly and send a strong message to the people of the United
States of America that Freedom and your rights are still protected in the United States District
Court of the District of Columbia.

That sanctions should be awarded to Plaintiff for the Negligence fo the Judges, the negligent
infliction of emotional distress inflicted on Plaintiff, the intentional infliction of emotional
distress of the ex parte communications and criminal actions of the Judges and Defendants.
That these actions were and are willful acts malicious, violent, oppressive, fraudulent,
wanton, and grossly reckless.

That a Grand Jury to investigate the actions of Defendants and Judge should be immediately
assembled.

That the appropriate authorities should be notified of the theft of documents, and all other
criminal actions of Defendants and Judges, and other Judicial and government employees.
That all orders. the Memorandum of Law in this case should be reviewed by a Judge who is
not bias.

June 15, 2014 Respectfully submitted,

Janice Wolk Greandier
15 W Spring Street
Alexandria, VA 22301
202-368-7178
jwgrenadier@gmail.com

21



UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
J ANICE WOLK GRENADIER
Pro se
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
jwgrenadier@gmail.com
202-368-7178
Plaintiff
v. No. 14-7020 September Term 2013
Civil Action No. 14-0162
Certificate of Service for Motion June 13, 2014
Ilona Grenadier Heckman
4200 Massachusetts Ave Apt 410
Washington DC 20016-4752
igrenadier@vafamilylaw.com
703-683-9000
GRENADEIR ANDERSON STRARACE DUFFETT &
KEISLER, PC
649 S. Washington Street
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-683-9000

COMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
Mark Herring
Office of the Attorney General
900 East Main Street
Richmond, VA 23219

Press@oag.state.va.us
(804) 786-2071

LORETTA LAX MILLER aka- LEAH LAX aka-
MUGGY CAT aka- BILLY SULLIVAN
Presidential Candidate for 2016
Campaign Headquarters
350 Market Street - This is a false address according to
the Post office that Loretta Lax Miller has given
Highspire, PA 17304
info@LorettaMiller4President.com

CAMPAIGN FOR LORETTA LAX MILLER
And all employees/volunteers
350 Market Street
Highspire, PA 17304
DEFENDANTS - Jointly and Severally, in their Official and Personal Capacities.

CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
Where is Plaintiff on June 6, 2014 Motion to Investigate Judge Beryl A Howell. That Service to the
following Defendants will be done through e-mail or mail to the above known address of defendants until
other service is required by law.


Date: June 13, 2014 Respectfully submitted,
/S/_____________________________
Janice Wolk Grenadier
15 West Spring Street
Alexandria, Virginia 22301
Telephone (202) 368-7178
Email jwgrenadier@gmail.com