0 оценок0% нашли этот документ полезным (0 голосов)
152 просмотров24 страницы
Beef slaughter HACCP Plan Rosenthal meat Science and Technology Center Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University College Station, Texas April 7, 2003 Version.
Beef slaughter HACCP Plan Rosenthal meat Science and Technology Center Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University College Station, Texas April 7, 2003 Version.
Beef slaughter HACCP Plan Rosenthal meat Science and Technology Center Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University College Station, Texas April 7, 2003 Version.
Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University College Station, Texas April 7, 2003 Version Signature Page Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan Signature: _______________________________________________________________ Jeff W. Savell, HACCP Coordinator Date Department of Animal Science Texas A&M University 2471 TAMU College Station, Texas 77843-2471 Telephone: 979-845-3935 E-mail: j-savell@tamu.edu Web Site: http://meat.tamu.edu/ Member Telephone Number Dr. Gary Acuff, Professor 979-845-4425 Carrie Adams, Student 979-845-3935 Dr. Davey Griffin, Associate Professor 979-845-0435 Dr. Kerri B. Harris 979-862-3643 Dr. Jimmy Keeton, Professor 979-845-3936 Andy King, Graduate Student 979-845-3957 Lisa Lucia, Research Assistant 979-845-4449 Dave McKenna, Graduate Student 979-845-3957 Pat Mies, Graduate Student 979-845-3957 Stacy Mueller, Student 979-845-3957 Kyle Pfeiffer, Student 979-845-3957 Kenneth Ray, Lead Meat Cutter 979-845-5651 Ray Riley, RMSTC Manager 979-845-5651 Dr. Jeff Savell, Professor 979-845-3935 Celeste Schuehle, Student 979-845-3957 Misty Pfeiffer Skaggs, Communication Specialist 979-862-3643 TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version HACCP Plan Summary Beef Slaughter Monitoring CCP Hazard Critical Limits What How Frequency Who Corrective Action 1 Verification 2 Records CCP 1B Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats Trim Zero Tolerance Pathogens No visible feces, milk or ingesta Each carcass, head and variety meat for visible feces, milk or ingesta Visual observation Each carcass, head and variety meat Carcass trimmer or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Trimming of visible contamination will bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Direct observation of employee conducting zero tolerance monitoring on one carcass and one head or variety meat per tree per kill by the plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation / Corrective Action Log CCP 2B Organic Acid Spray Pathogens (1) The concentration of the organic acid solution must be at least 2%. (2) Each carcass, head and variety meat is sprayed with the organic acid solution. Organic acid concentration Application to carcasses, and heads and variety meats on trees Titration test kit Visual observation At beginning and end of production Each carcass, head and variety meat on trees Organic acid person or designee Carcass washer or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Visual observation of: (1) Titration test kit use, and (2) Employee applying the organic acid spray. Direct observation of employee conducting organic acid spray will be performed one time during the day of slaughter by plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation / Corrective Action Log CCP 3B Chilling Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats Pathogens <40F surface temperature for carcasses, heads and variety meats within 24 hours of slaughter. Surface temperature of carcasses (chuck for forequarter and round for hindquarter), heads, and variety meats. Temperature Monitoring Device Carcasses - 25% of the kill minimum of 1 carcass; Heads 1 head per tree; and Variety Meats 1 variety meat per tree. Cooler operator or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Weekly calibration and/or verification of temperature monitoring device by plant manager or designee. Direct observation of employee taking temperatures for chilling will be performed one time during the day of slaughter by plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation/ Corrective Action Log Temperature Monitoring Device Calibration and/or Verification Log
1 Plant manager or designee is responsible for performing corrective actions to ensure appropriate corrective actions are taken. 2 Direct observation of corrective action by plant manager or designee will be conducted when a deviation is found during the pre-shipment record review. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version PRODUCT DESCRIPTION COMPANY NAME: Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center PRODUCT NAME: Beef Carcasses, Heads, and Variety Meats (Liver, Oxtail, Hanging Tender and Heart) PRODUCT DESCRIPTION: Beef carcasses and by-products INTENDED USE OF PRODUCT? General public consumption. Periodically, some products are used for teaching, research and extension activities. TYPE OF PACKAGE? Not applicable WHERE WILL IT BE SOLD? Retail sales area of the Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Wholesale Teaching, research and extension programs and activities LABELING INSTRUCTIONS: Safe handling label Keep refrigerated Keep frozen DISTRIBUTION METHOD? If shipped, by refrigerated truck or insulated container. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version PRODUCTS/INGREDIENTS USED TO PRODUCE PRODUCT: MEAT/POULTRY AND BYPRODUCTS NONMEAT FOOD INGREDIENTS BINDERS/ EXTENDERS Cattle SPICES/FLAVORINGS RESTRICTED INGREDIENTS PRESERVATIVES/ ACIDIFIERS OTHER Organic acid Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter Flow Chart Cattle Receiving and Holding Bleeding Foreshanking and Heading Hindshanking and Rimming Dehiding with Hide Puller Evisceration Electrical Stimulation Trim - Zero Tolerance Final Wash Variety Meats Processing Organic Acid Spray Stunning Head Processing Splitting Chilling Organic Acid Spray Chilling Note: Ante-mortem inspection occurs after receiving cattle and prior to weighing, and post-mortem inspection occurs throughout the process. Organic Acid Spray Chilling (CCP 2B) (CCP 2B) (CCP 2B) (CCP 3B) (CCP 1B) Dry Storage April 7, 2003 Version Receiving Organic Acid (CCP 3B) (CCP 3B) Trim - Zero Tolerance (CCP 1B) Trim - Zero Tolerance (CCP 1B) TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 1 Beef Slaughter Hazard Analysis Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Cattle Receiving and Holding Physical: Buckshot, bullets, needles Chemical: Antibiotic residues Illegal drug residue Pesticides Biological: Enteric pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No No Yes Unlikely to occur. No reported incidences of these hazards have been made at this facility Jan. 1, 1998 to December 15, 2002. Unlikely to occur. USDA Residue Monitoring Program indicates that the great majority of livestock are free of violative residues when slaughtered in inspected facilities. Any animals used for research involving chemical exposure will follow protocol for proper use. Inspector pulls STOP samples on high risk and show cattle, and there have been no known antibiotic violations at this facility Jan. 1, 1998 to December 15, 2002. Live animals are potential reservoirs of pathogens. Based on the Smith, et. al. (2001) and Elder, et. al. (2000) data supplied from USDAs FSIS these microorganisms are reasonably likely to occur. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No Stunning Physical: Bone fragments Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: None identified at this time. No Unlikely to occur. The non-penetrating stunning mechanism may fracture the skull, but as required by inspection, the brain cavity is flushed with water to remove the brains and any bone fragments. In addition, brains are not kept for consumption. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 2 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Bleeding Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Live animals may be a reservoir for pathogens. Hide opening and sticking may introduce pathogens from the hide onto the carcass. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No Fore- shanking and Heading Physical: Tying device used for tying the esophagus (weasand). Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Unlikely to occur. String is used to tie the esophagus (weasand), and the weasand is removed during evisceration. Therefore, this is not a food safety hazard. The hide is a potential reservoir for pathogens. Hide opening and removal of foreshank and head may introduce pathogens onto the carcass. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 3 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Hind- shanking and Rimming Physical: Plastic bag and tying device Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Plastic bag and tying device are used to secure the bung to reduce fecal leakage and is removed with the viscera during evisceration. Therefore, this is not a food safety hazard. Hide is a potential reservoir for pathogens. Hindshanking and rimming may introduce pathogens onto the carcass. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No Dehiding with Hide Puller Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Live animals are a potential reservoir for pathogens. Pathogens may be introduced onto the carcass during opening of the hide and using the hide puller. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 4 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Evisceration Physical: Plastic bag and tying device Chemical: None identified at this time Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Plastic bag and tying devices used to secure weasand and bung at previous steps are removed with viscera. Viscera are not kept at this facility. Visceral contents may contain pathogens. Pathogens may be introduced onto the carcass during evisceration. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No Electrical Stimulation Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: None identified at this time. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 5 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Splitting Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: None identified at this time. Trim Zero Tolerance Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Visible feces, milk or ingesta may indicate potential pathogen contamination. Yes Removal of visible contamination is required by a Federal Register notice from USDA/FSIS entitled Livestock Carcasses and Poultry Carcasses Contaminated With Visible Fecal Material published on Nov. 28, 1997. Trim all visible feces, milk or ingesta. Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 6 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Final Wash Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: None identified at this time. Organic Acid Spray Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: Organic acid Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Unlikely to occur. A food-grade organic acid is used at an acceptable concentration. The proper application of food-grade organic acid will reduce pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Organic acid spray Yes Chilling Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Proper chilling controls pathogen growth, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Chilling Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 7 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Head Processing Physical: Bone fragments Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Enteric pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Unlikely to occur. Stunning mechanism may fracture the skull, but as required by inspection, the brain cavity is flushed with water. The brains are not kept for consumption. Raw meat is potentially contaminated with pathogens. Based on the Smith and Elder data supplied from USDAs FSIS these microorganisms are reasonably likely to occur. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth Trim Zero Tolerance Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Visible feces, milk or ingesta may indicate potential pathogen contamination. Yes Removal of visible contamination is required by a Federal Register notice from USDA/FSIS entitled Livestock Carcasses and Poultry Carcasses Contaminated With Visible Fecal Material published on Nov. 28, 1997. Trim all visible feces, milk or ingesta. Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 8 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Organic Acid Spray Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: Organic acid Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Unlikely to occur. A food-grade organic acid is used according to regulatory specifications. The proper application of food-grade organic acids can reduce pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Organic acid spray Yes Chilling Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Proper chilling controls pathogen growth, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Chilling Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 9 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Variety Meats Processing Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Raw variety meats are potentially contaminated with pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Subsequent steps: Organic acid spraying to reduce pathogens Chilling to control pathogen growth No Trim Zero Tolerance Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Visible feces, milk or ingesta may indicate potential pathogen contamination. Yes Removal of visible contamination is required by a Federal Register notice from USDA/FSIS entitled Livestock Carcasses and Poultry Carcasses Contaminated With Visible Fecal Material published on Nov. 28, 1997. Trim all visible feces, milk or ingesta. Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 10 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Organic Acid Spray Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: Organic acid Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) No Yes Unlikely to occur. A food-grade organic acid is used according to regulatory specifications. The proper application of food-grade organic acids can reduce pathogens, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Organic acid spray Yes Chilling Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: Pathogens (i.e., Salmonella and E. coli O157:H7) Yes Proper chilling controls pathogen growth, including E. coli O157:H7 and Salmonella. Chilling Yes TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version 11 Ingredient/ Process Step Potential hazard introduced, controlled, enhanced or reduced at this step Is the potential food safety hazard reasonably likely to occur? Justification for decision What control measures can be applied to prevent the food safety hazards that are reasonably likely to occur? Is this step a critical control point (CCP)? Receiving Organic Acid Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: Organic acid Biological: None identified at this time. No Food-grade organic acid is used. Letter of guarantee from chemical supplier states that food- grade lactic acid is considered GRAS under 21 CFR 184.1061 Dry Storage Physical: None identified at this time. Chemical: None identified at this time. Biological: None identified at this time. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version CCP Description, Critical Limits, Monitoring Procedures, Corrective Actions PRODUCT: Beef Slaughter Process Step CCP Number CCP Description Critical Limits Establishment Monitoring Procedures: (What/How/Frequency/Responsible Person) Corrective Actions 1 Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats Trim Zero Tolerance CCP 1B No visible feces, milk or ingesta No visible feces, milk or ingesta What: Each carcass, head and variety meat for visible feces, milk or ingesta How: Visual observation Frequency: Each carcass, head, and variety meat Responsible Person: Carcass trimmer or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Trimming of visible contamination will bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Mixing and Spraying Organic Acid CCP 2B Organic Acid Spray 1. The concentration of the organic acid solution must be at least 2%. 2. Each carcass, head and variety meat is sprayed with the organic acid solution. What: Organic acid concentration How: Titration test kit Frequency: One time per day on days of slaughter Responsible person: Organic acid person or designee What: Application to carcasses, heads, and variety meats on trees How: Visual observation Frequency: Each carcass, head, and variety meat on trees Responsible person: Carcass washer or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Chilling Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats CCP 3B Chilling of carcasses, heads, and variety meats <40F surface temperature for carcasses, heads, and variety meats within 24 hours of slaughter. What: Surface temperature of carcasses (chuck for forequarter and round for hindquarter), heads, and variety meats. How: Temperature Monitoring Device Frequency: Carcasses - 25% of the kill; minimum of 1 carcass; Heads - 1 head per tree; and Variety Meats 1 variety meat per tree. Responsible person: Cooler operator or designee 1. Identify and eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. Unforeseen Hazards There are chances that unforeseen hazards may occur at the Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center. Therefore, if an unforeseen hazard occurs, this establishment will: 1. Segregate and hold the affected product, at least until the requirements of (2) and (3) are met; 2. Perform a review to determine the acceptability of the affected product for distribution; 3. Take action, when necessary, with respect to the affected product to ensure that no product that is injurious to health or otherwise adulterated, as a result of the deviation, enters commerce; 4. Perform or obtain reassessment by an individual trained in accordance with section 417.7 of the USDA/FSIS Pathogen Reduction; Hazard Analysis and Critical Control Point (HACCP) Systems; Final Rule, to determine whether the newly identified deviation or other unforeseen hazard should be incorporated into the HACCP plan.
1 Plant manager or designee is responsible for performing corrective actions to ensure appropriate corrective actions are taken. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center - Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version Beef Slaughter Verification and Recordkeeping Process Step/CCP Verification 1 Records CCP 1B Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats Trim Zero Tolerance Direct observation of employee conducting zero tolerance monitoring on one carcass and one head or variety meat per tree per kill by the plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation/Corrective Action Log CCP 2B Organic Acid Spray Visual observation of: (1) Titration test kit use, and (2) Employee applying the organic acid spray. Direct observation of employee conducting organic acid spray will be performed one time during the day of slaughter by plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation/Corrective Action Log CCP 3B Chilling Carcasses, Heads and Variety Meats Weekly calibration and/or verification of temperature monitoring device by plant manager or designee. Direct observation of employee taking temperatures for chilling will be performed one time during the day of slaughter by plant manager or designee. For each beef slaughter, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee. Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Deviation/Corrective Action Log Temperature Monitoring Device Calibration and/or Verification Log Prior to fabrication/shipping, records will be reviewed by the plant manager or designee.
1 Direct observation of corrective action by plant manager or designee will be conducted when a deviation is found during the preshipment record review. TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version Beef Slaughter Carcass Log Processing Date: Slaughter Number Critical Limit CCP 1 Performed by Time Critical Limit CCP 2 Performed By Time Direct Observation Carcass Number Statement Signature Time CCP 1 CCP 2 CCP 1 Trim Zero Tolerance; Critical Limit: No visible feces, milk or ingesta. CCP 2 Organic Acid Spray; Critical Limit: (1). The concentration of the organic acid solution must be at least 2%. (2). Each carcass, head and variety meat is sprayed with the organic acid solution. Acceptable Statements: No Visible FMI; Carcass Sprayed CCP 1 & 2 Verification Record Review: Signature:__________________________ Result:__________________________________ Date:_______________ Time:____________ Organic Acid Concentration CCP 2: Titration Test 10 drops = 1% solution and 20 drops = 2% solution. Chilling CCP 3 Critical Limit: <40F surface temperature (chuck or round), trees of variety meats, and trees of heads at 24 hours. Number of Drops Performed By Time Carcass # Temp. F Date/Time Initial Chuck: Round: Chuck: Round: Chuck: Round: CCP 2 Direct Observation of Titration Test Kit Use: Result _____________________________ Signature:_____________________________________ Date:__________________ Time:__________________ CCP 3 Verification Record Review: Result ________________________________ Signature:______________________________ Date:__________________ Time:_______________ Pre-shipment Review Signature:_________________________________________ Approved Date:____________________ Time:_________________ CCP 3 Verification Direct Observation: Result ____________________________ Signature:______________________________ Date:__________________ Time:_______________ TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version Deviation/Corrective Action Log CCP 1 1. Identify & eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Trimming of visible contamination will bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. CCP 2 1. Identify & eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. CCP 3 1. Identify & eliminate cause of deviation. 2. Bring CCP under control after corrective action is taken. 3. Measures to prevent recurrence are established. 4. No product that is injurious to health or adulterated enters commerce. CCP No. Product I.D. Deviation Corrective Action No. 1 Corrective Action No. 2 Corrective Action No. 3 Corrective Action No. 4 Performed By Time Pre-shipment Review Signature:________________________________________ Approved Date:____________________ Time:_________________ TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version Beef Slaughter Heads and Variety Meats Log Processing Date: Slaughter Number Critical Limit CCP 1 Performed by Time Critical Limit CCP 2 Performed By Time Carcass/Tree Number Statement Signature Time CCP 1 CCP 2 CCP 1 Trim Zero Tolerance; Critical Limit: No visible feces, milk or ingesta. CCP 2 Organic Acid Spray; Critical Limit: (1). The concentration of the organic acid solution must be at least 2%. (2). Each carcass, head and variety meat is sprayed with the organic acid solution. Acceptable Statements: No Visible FMI; Carcass Sprayed CCP 1 & 2 Verification Record Review: Signature:_________________________________ Result:___________________________________ Date:_______________ Time:____________ Pre-shipment Review Signature:______________________________________ Approved Date:___________________ Time:______________ Chilling CCP 3 Critical Limit: <40F surface temperature trees of variety meats, and trees of heads at 24 hours. Tree # Temp. F Date/Time Initial CCP 3 Verification Record Review: Result:_______________________________ Signature______________________________ Date:_______________ Time:____________ TAMU Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Beef Slaughter HACCP Plan April 7, 2003 Version Rosenthal Meat Science and Technology Center Texas A&M University Temperature Monitoring Device Calibration and/or Verification Log Date Time Temperature Monitoring Device Identification Temperature Reading at: 32F 212F Action Taken Performed by Date Time Location Temperature Monitoring Device Reading F Calibrated Thermometer Monitoring Device Reading F Action Taken Performed by Holding Cooler Aging Cooler Cooked Meat Cooler Cured Meat Cooler Freezer Chill-Down Probe 1 Chill-Down Probe 2 Reviewed by:_____________________________________ Date:_____________________________