The Honorable Jay Barnes, Vice Chair Committee on Elementary and Secondary Education Missouri House of Representatives State Capitol Jefferson City, MO 65101
Re: House Bill 1303 ACLU Statement
Dear Chair Cookson and Vice Chair Barnes,
The ACLU of Missouri defends the constitutional rights and civil liberties of all Missourians as guaranteed under the Constitutions of the United States and Missouri. On behalf of our thousands of members and activists across the state, we wish to share our concerns regarding House Bill 1303 (HB 1303). HB 1303 seeks to protect students rights to express and practice their faith in the public schools. However, these student rights are already well-protected by existing law. And, as a result of the way the bill articulates these rights, we have three concerns.
(1) The First Amendment already protects students voluntary ability to pray and express religious viewpoints.
The U.S. Constitution, the Missouri Constitution, and federal laws already guarantee that Missouri public school students cannot be denied, among other rights, the right to:
Pray individually or in groups or to discuss their religious views with their peers so long as they are not disruptive;
Express their religious beliefs in the form of reports, homework, and artwork where those beliefs are germane to the assignment; 3601 Main Street Kansas City, MO 64111 (816) 470-9933 www.aclu-mo.org
454 Whittier Street St. Louis, MO 63108 (314) 652-3114 (314) 652-3112
OFFICERS AND DIRECTORS
Sheila Greenbaum President
Thomas Hayde Daron Smith Vice Presidents
Bob Waugh Treasurer
Shontaia Riley Secretary
STAFF
Jeffrey A. Mittman Executive Director
Anthony Rothert Legal Director
Nancy Burchfield Director of Philanthropy
Diane Balogh Communications Director
Grant Doty Staff Attorney
Mustafa Abdullah Program Associate
Deborah Read Executive Assistant
Michael Hill Paralegal
Crystal Williams Jay Hardenbrook Lobbyists Chair Cookson & Vice Chair Barnes HB 1303ACLU Statement January 29, 2014 Page 2
Participate in before- or after-school events, such as see you at the pole activities;
Distribute religious literature to their schoolmates, subject to reasonable time, place, and manner or other constitutionally acceptable restrictions imposed on the distribution of all non-school literature;
Speak to, and attempt to persuade, their peers about religious topics just as they do with regard to political or other topics;
Form religious clubs in secondary school and to have equal access to campus media to announce their meetings if a school receives federal funds and permits other student non- curricular clubs to meet during non-instructional time; and
Wear T-shirts with religious messages and the like, which may not be singled out for suppression. 1
(2) HB 1303 creates confusion about students religious rights and their right to religious expression.
The U.S. Department of Education has stated that the right to engage in voluntary prayer or religious discussion free from discrimination does not include the right to have a captive audience listen, or to compel other students to participate. Teachers and school administrators should ensure that no student is in any way coerced to participate in religious activity. 2
We are concerned that this bill may subject students to religious coercion in a limitless range of settings, including those which the Constitution already prohibits, e.g., prayers over the loudspeaker at football games and reciting Bible verses during morning announcements, causing affected students and others to file lawsuits.
(3) The confusion this bill creates for students, teachers, and administrators may result in litigation.
The bill, in its articulation of a true limited public forum, may exclude students that do not meet certain criteria from ever speaking in the purported forum. As a result, these
1 See for example Religious Expression in the Public Schools, issued by the United States Department of Education, Secretary of Education, May 1998; and Religion In The Public Schools: A Joint Statement of Current Law, 1995, issued by thirty-seven religious liberty organizations, including the Christian Legal Society, the National Association of Evangelicals, the Anti-Defamation League, the American Civil Liberties Union, the National Council of Churches, the Presbyterian Church (USA) and the United Methodist Church, General Board of Church and Society.
2 See Religious Expression in the Public Schools, issued by the United States Department of Education, Secretary of Education, May 1998. Chair Cookson & Vice Chair Barnes HB 1303ACLU Statement January 29, 2014 Page 3
American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri 3601 Main Street, Kansas City, MO 64111 | Phone: 816-470-9933 454 Whittier Street, St. Louis, MO 63108 | Phone: 314-652-3114 Fax: 314-652-3112 | www.aclu-mo.org
students may seek judicial relief to force school districts into establishing true limited public forums and accepting the speech consequences that come with such forums. Furthermore, the confusion that this bill creates may result in studentsknowingly or unknowinglypushing the envelope and getting punished or expelled for religious expression.
Thank you for allowing us the opportunity to share our concerns. Please feel free to contact the undersigned should you have any questions or require any additional information.
Sincerely,
Jeffrey A. Mittman Executive Director American Civil Liberties Union of Missouri
The Legal Project's Demand Letter On Behalf of Kasra Shhahosseini, Founder and President of UCI Irvine Student Group 'Ex-Muslims and Critics of Islam' To UCI Student Programming Board