Академический Документы
Профессиональный Документы
Культура Документы
|
Ex.
| |
(2) Equivalent Resistance:
Ex.
Table 2. Voltage Drop and Equivalent Resistance per Node
Node 1 Node 2 Node 3 Node 4 Node 5
Voltage Drop
(V)
5.32 V 2.256 V 1.7958 V 6.3544 V 2.2738 V
Equivalent
Resistance
(R
eq
)
5911.11 2506.6 1995.3 7060.4 2526.4
Using equations (3-4) for equivalent resistance of resistors in series and parallel circuits,
combinations of resistors to achieve the calculated values within a range of 5% for
each node were then determined. Equation (5) was used to ensure the equivalent
resistance was within the margin of error for the node.
(3) Equivalent Resistance, Series:
(4) Equivalent Resistance, Parallel:
(5) Calculated (Theoretical) % Error:
|
( )
( )|
( )
Using these equations, and attempting to achieve equivalent resistance values within
just 1% margin of error to ensure a sizeable cushion, a final circuit design was devised
and implemented. A schematic for the final circuit is shown in Figure 1.
4
Figure 1. Final Circuit Schematic
5
Sample Calculations
1) Equivalent Resistance of Resistors in Series (Figure 2):
Figure 2. Series Resistors
Ex.
2) Equivalent Resistance of Resistors in Parallel (Figure 3):
Figure 3. Parallel Resistors
Ex.
[ ]
3) Ohms Law (Using node 1 of circuit):
Voltage:
Ex.
Current:
Ex.
Resistance:
Ex.
6
4) Kirchhoffs Current Law (Figure 4): Current In = Current Out
Figure 4. Kirchhoffs Voltage Law
Ex.
5) Kirchhoffs Voltage Law (Figure 5):
Figure 5. Example Circuit
Ex. ( ) [
]
Observations and Results
The final circuit design was tested using an 18 V DC power source and a current of
0.0009 A. The circuit was tested at each indicated node along the breadboard to
measure that nodes voltage.
7
Upon testing, the circuit was confirmed to produce values within the 5% margin of error
at each of the five nodes. Table 3 shows both the target and measured voltage values at
each node, as well as the percent difference at each node.
Table 3. Test Results
Voltage Divider
Node
Target Voltage
(V)
Measured Voltage
(V)
% Error
1 12.68 V 12.51 V 1.34 %
2 10.424 V 10.28 V 1.38 %
3 8.6282 V 8.5 V 1.49 %
4 2.2738 V 2.2 V 3.25 %
5 0 V 0 V 0 %
Discussion
The values obtained during testing all fell well within the 5% margin of error. The
largest percent difference came at node 4, with a calculated error of 3.25 %. None of the
other nodes produced an error above 1.5 %. Further, with the decreasing voltage values
at each node and the limited precision of the voltage value provided by the multimeter, it
is entirely possible that a significant percentage difference increase could be attributed
to something as simple as a rounding error. For example, at a value of 2.2738 V, as in
node 4, rounding down from 2.24 V to 2.2 V could change the percent difference from
just 1.49 % to the 3.25 % indicated above.
Many lessons were learned from the design, construction and testing of this circuit. The
design portion of this project provided insight into the calculations used to determine
voltage drop across a resistance, calculation of the equivalent resistance of a set of
resistors and multiple other calculations that can be used to aid in the design of a circuit,
as well as their proper application in the design process. Testing also provided a
valuable, yet unexpected lesson. The values obtained through testing this circuit
provided feedback on just how important the precision of measured values could be
during testing and the level of variance that a relatively inaccurate measurement could
produce in the results.
8
Conclusion
The goal of this project was to design a voltage drop circuit to reduce an 18 V DC input
voltage at a specific current to several specified values along the circuits path. A limited
number of resistors in five resistance values were supplied, along with the other
necessary components and the proper equations, for the design and construction of this
circuit. The tested voltages at each of these points, or nodes, along the path were
required to be within a 5% range of the given values.
Using the equations (Ohms Law, etc.) for both calculating the proper resistance values
needed to drop the voltage to the required value and for calculating equivalent
resistance of resistors in series and parallel, an appropriate circuit design was created
and constructed. Testing of the circuit created for this 18 V load at 0.0009 A was
performed and measurements at each of the five nodes provided for this circuit showed
to be within the margin of error, with a maximum error of 3.25 %.
There were multiple lessons learned throughout this process, as well as a couple of
issues that arose that could be addressed to produce a more accurate analysis of a
constructed circuit. The proper use of equations such as Ohms and Kirchhoffs laws and
the calculation of equivalent resistors in series and parallel were learned. The
importance of more and more precise measurement equipment as values drop to ensure
accurate analysis was observed.
These basic lessons and results can all be used to aid in future circuit designs and
analyses.
9
References
"Experiment 2: Voltage and Current Division." Lamar University Circuits Laboratory.
http://ee.lamar.edu/EELABS/ELEN2107/Lab2.pdf (accessed April 15, 2014).
"Parallel Circuits." Parallel Circuits.
http://www.physicsclassroom.com/class/circuits/Lesson-4/Parallel-Circuits
(accessed April 15, 2014).